@@mountkeen8701 Woody Allen had already died and met his Creator. His isn't an atheist anymore.

​@@newcreationinchrist1423 amen

@@newcreationinchrist1423you’re assuming that Jehovah exists and is still alive today, which itself is a massive leap in logic

John 10:6 Jesus Identified as an intimate object. Jesus ahead of his time. Today males identify as female. Jesus identified as a door. Even asked people to knock.

Shut up

​@All About Britain what was speculation exactly?

@All About Britain I didn't say anything at all in regards to that. I don't know why you're arguing with me and I can't seem to figure out what argument you're even making since we're talking about completely different aspects of the video.

@All About Britain Perhaps this might clarify what I'm saying. I was referring to the plethora of fossils dated tens of millions of years old, fossils of non extinct animals. We are to believe that a modern animal A somehow evolved from animal B, yet animal A is STILL present, walking, flying or swimming across the Earth today. If an animal evolved into a completely different species, then why do we still observe the original creature today? Somehow evolutionary pressure caused the sea sponge to evolve into a plethora of new species over millions of years, but we still have sea sponges.

It's nice to see through the fog of lies that evolution fills us with, isn't it?

Don't expect to get truth from the secular world!

A likely cause is in Geneis 6:2 -- "that the sons of God saw the daughters of men, that they were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves of all whom they chose." It's interesting that there's a defined distinction between "the sons of God" and "the daughters of men". If the "sons" were men/human of Adamic descent, then why were they not plainly indicated as such? The term "sons of God" in Hebrew can contextually mean "angels"; the book of Job, written earlier than Genesis, also used the same phrase to mean the same thing (ref Job 1:6; 2:1). Like Adam, they were also directly created by God, but they're immaterial (without physical bodies) and were not created from the dust of the earth. God created creatures "according to their kind" (1:21, 24-25). Hence, angels and mankind were of different created kinds. And when God specifically commanded man (male and female) to "be fruitful and multiply (1:28)", it meant that the earth be populated by HUMANKIND through the physical union of man and woman. God's judgment (Gen 6:1-7) was against the wickedness -- NATURAL EVIL -- that He saw in what has multiplied across the earth -- "There were giants on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men and they bore children to them. Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown. (Genesis 6:4)". The "giants" were brought about by the union between "the sons of God" (angels) and "the daughters of men" (humans). This is an ABOMINATION to God because they are not part of His original created order. When God said, "I will destroy man..." (Gen 6:7), "destroy" meant "to erase", "blot out", "wipe away". Given the (lack of) human fossilization, I believe that God was literally dead serious in His judgment such that He "erased" / "blotted out" / "wiped away" any trace of the abominable HYBRID (angelic-human) population from the earth...except Noah and his family of seven people. God was specific about "the wickedness of man", and did not cite the same abomination to have occurred among all the other creatures, so they were not "erased". --- "For if God did not spare the angels who sinned, but cast them down to hell and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved for judgment; and did not spare the ancient world, but saved Noah, one of eight people, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood on the world of the ungodly..." - II Peter 2:4‭-‬5 c

There are human fossils. We have The Ice Man of Italy, a complete mummy, and we have many prehistoric human skeletons in the Rising Star cave in South Africa.

You want to find human fossils in a seabed alongside fish fossils?

@@jamespriddy8275 A mummified remain, whilst commonly referred to as a fossil, is not fossilised. Why don't we find fossilised humans amongst the dinosaurs? Why do we find no mammals at all before about 200 million years ago?

@@macrontellsjoe9571 No, but wouldn't we find them on all levels of the fossil record. We don't. We find no mammals at all before 200 million years ago. If you'll forgive me, you seem to have fabricated a straw man here to avoid confronting the problem.

You said, "The problem begins when we approach with everything to fit a certain interpretation." Which side are you on?

@@gregoswald7723 We as Christians I don't think it is our obligation or mission to try to explain everything. For Christ did not send me (us) to baptize, but to preach the gospel-not with wisdom and eloquence, lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power. 1 Corinthians 1:17 NIV

@@gregoswald7723 I didn't know being honest, truthful and correct had a side . maybe you need to rethink a little.

@@leehogg4624 You said, "The problem begins when we approach with everything to fit a certain interpretation." There are , as I see it, three sides. 1. The Young Earth Creationists. 2. The Old Earth Religious. 3. The Old Earth non-Religious. Each "side" believes it is the honest, truthful and correct side. Each side can't understand how the other sides can possibly believe what they believe, when the Bible or the Science or both, make their position so clear. You originally said, "The best way is to approach with skepticism." But then later you responded with, "I didn't know being honest, truthful and correct had a side ." It appears that you are not looking at your own "side" with skepticism since you believe it to be "honest, truthful and CORRECT..." So I guess you think that others should look at their own side with skepticism, since they are not correct. Let me ask you a simple question: How do you know that the world and everything in it, wasn't created this morning, 5 minutes before you "woke up"? You, your house, your car, your friends, the Bible, all created this morning. Your "memories" were created this morning too, which make you believe you have lived for years and make you believe you "know" stuff. How do you know God didn't create you and the world this morning? God can do anything. In case you are wondering, I am on the side of the Old Earth Religious. I believe there is a very good chance there is a God and there is a very good chance that the Earth took millions of years to get to where it is today. And, I look at all three "sides" with skepticism.

@@gregoswald7723 that kind of question ....how do I know the world wasn't just created is a diversionary tactic. We can only know so much. But we can use our knowledge to give a best fit answer to many questions. For example, is the bible correct ? Is it factual , did Jesus exist and if so are the accounts verifiable . Straight away the bible is looking very shaky, that's without even doing any research. I have done research , I've looked at both sides and the case for Christianity looks worse as the scrutiny increases ....plus the other religions, are they correct and which denomination do you choose ?

What bible translation are you reading?

Big fan of GodLogic. Testify is another great channel. InspiringPhilosophy has done some great work rebutting silly arguments against Christ. And some amazing longer videos. Can I recommend Mike Winger for in depth studies of the Bible and understanding the theology and teachings within? He's always very clear on when he speaks his own opinion. Has grace for other viewpoints. Studies hugely before speaking on a topic. Always shows his sources. And best of all.... Really Loves Jesus.

​@@monteclark1115 poor aron. Jesus loves you monte.

​@@SaintRegime good suggestions.

You dont know anything about science do you?

Lame

Yes, Ray Comfort is a good comedian

Its weird calling it a gmo. It was selectively bred.

I don't like bananas 😕.

God had a big bucket of iridium that he accidentally spilled.

It doesn't need explanation. It's only called a boundary in aid of supporting a predetermined hypothesis.

@@nathancook2852 That's the fault of your argument. It's explained with a creator. Your science fails even when the outcome is known.

@@mountkeen8701 Obviously not, I was just saying that it was possible that the creationist POV had some credence. I say that because in Intro Bio the evolution chart was tacked up in the lecture hall. I noticed a missing link in every phylum. So I enrolled in Bible Intro. It took as much faith to believe the Word as evolution. Thanks

@@chrisreeves8037 "I noticed a missing link in every phylum"..... Yes and if that missing link was found you's end up with two new missing links. Whats your point?

@@mountkeen8701 I first learned about deposition HS Bio. The flood mentioned above was two years after this class. A couple more years pass, I enroll in Intro Bio and Geology (1978). These classes are in same hall; hence, the evolution chart on the wall. In short I am trying get folks to think, practice writing, and read others POV.

Considering that Texas is #1 in the Bible belt I'm not surprised at your ignorance

@@chrisreeves8037 Why not just encourage people to read scientific articles? POVs are pretty worthless at making sound decisions regarding the fields of science

Not when the 29% results of continental plate tectonics prove otherwise ...

@@manuelwatts1864 Manuel uses "prove" like it was fact. That is not being truthful, Manuel.

Because there isn’t enough water…. What kind of logic are you using?

​@@manuelwatts1864 plate tectonics don't prove anything of the sort. The only thing they do is give atheists a theory that can just as easily be explained by the Flood of Noah.

​@@Specogecko perhaps you didn't know there's water underneath the Earth's crust as well. 🤔✝️🙏

There are SO MANY problems with believing the flood narrative as a literal historical event. It's a purity test of faith because you have to dismiss pretty much all of science to believe it.

Because event like that was extremely violent . Mountains came down left and right. Genesis is oversimplified need to know basic, noahs point of view that doesn’t explain or describe all events surrounding flood timeline. Fallen ones (angels, aliens) lived in flesh with humans up that point and everything was destroyed. Noah doesn’t explain how earth was repopulated too , but as a believer in almighty God i believe He personally knows stuff about dna engineering ❤

This video is like a fairy tale for adults.

I have some heartbreaking news to tell you, there is no Santa Claus. Sorry I had to be the one to tell you, but now that you're 12 years old, I think it's time you started thinking like an adult. I'm sorry your mom didn't tell you, that was very unfair of her.

As a young child, I remember waking up on Christmas morning and seeing lot of wrapped gifts under the tree. My parents told me Santas Claus brought them during the night, coming down the chimney. Many years later, I wondered how Santas Claus could come down the chimney since our house didn't have a chimney. But I saw in a book that same story, and I realized my parents told the truth! I'm 61 years old now and still believe in Santa Claus.

@@andretison9671 it's a Christmas miracle

@@bootycalled2780 you can mock God all you want. Ik he’s real, easy to prove and just as easy to prove how being a atheist is literally the most retarded thing imaginable. Thinking 1+1=3 is smarter then thinking nothing created everything 😂

It's pretty obvious ain't it.

@globalcoupledances geology of Virginia? 🤔 I have never found any while living in Virginia since living there for 12 years. But West Virginia a lot. It took us 5-6 hours to get there from Maryland, where I was raised.

@@globalcoupledances wikipedia

Just shows millions of years ago that land an ocean and only natural to expect to see marine fossils.

@@BobSmith-ew5oinot millions of years! Recent history…😏

​@julieturcios41 deep in the valley I believe was where they were found.

Those are Mud Fossils. A term that doesn't even officially exist in the Scientific Community yet. But they have to be aware of it and the concept by now. Lots of people have borrowed bits and pieces of Roger Spurr's extensive research with his having received no credit for it.

@@UserRandJ So where's you peer reviewed papers, you Nobel prizes, your fame and fortune? And while you're at it, maybe you can explain how anything in modern Biology works as it's all based on evolution which you say is wrong? And what's you beef with evolution anyway? Even if you could prove it wrong, it doesn't get you any nearer to a supernatural creature who created the universe.

@@mountkeen8701 Well, that is the mind set of theists. They live in a make-believe reality so it's easy for them.

Except not. Evolution is not spontaneously morphing into an entirely different species. The closest to such a phenomenon would be metamorphosis. While metamorphosis does occur in nature, it is not synonymous with speciation. Speciation occurs when organisms of the same species are separated and endure separate natural pressures over many generations which result in genetic and physiological changes significant enough that the descendants of those organisms can no longer interbreed. The offspring of those organisms have become separate species in other words. Regarding time scale, it depends on what particular organisms we are speaking of. Simple single celled organisms can evolve very quickly as they have generation after generation within a single day. When doctors tell us to complete a regiment of antibiotics, they are telling us that because failure to do so may result in the strongest most resistant organisms surviving and passing on their genes in the form of much stronger more resistant infection. Again, evolve does not mean an organism spontaneously changes into another organism. Evolution is population mechanics/genetics over time. Humans did not come from any modern monkey or ape. Our ancestors were humans until we go far back enough we don’t recognize them as humans. There are literally libraries of data regarding natural selection. We in fact do have bones and fossils from prehistory to corroborate this. Hypothetically, even if we didn’t, there is still ample evidence of biological evolution in genetic code (and no, that does not refer to code as a computer programmer would understand it). You’re attempting to create a false dichotomy; either you believe deities exist, or you believe natural phenomena occur. I remember this sort of fundamentalist evangelical indoctrination from the 1980s and 1990s. One may believe in deities while also understanding the scientific process, and how we came to know it. Conversely, one may not believe in deities, but believe in fantastical or dubious claims such as those intrinsic within astrology or solipsism. Evolutionary biology is not a religion. This was confirmed even in the legal system in the 2005 Kitsmiller vs. Dover decision. Unfortunately, fraudulent organizations such as Answers in Genesis and Living Waters ministries have purposefully confused the definition of evolution as it pertains to biology.

@@highpriestofgavinalmightyh1304 brilliant remark! The so-called "believers" deliberately misrepresent evolution because it is too corrosive to their silly supernatural beliefs! We are nothing but a species of apes nothing more nothing less! And do those "believers" really believe that the homo sapiens are the only species of apes that can survive their own death by going to an imaginary hell or heaven? It's an insult to my intelligence and it should be an insult to the intelligence of everybody else!!!

Who authored Corinthians?

Impressive that you choose a biblical character from 2000 years ago in an attempt to argue against modern science. No doubt that you have a crayon illustration as evidence

Bar4d2ock - _"u ain’t gotta ignore reality to be able to be religious"_ *True, but you DO have to ignore reality to believe in evolution.*

@@mountkeen8701 *see got questions They actually recently did a video on that

Spoken like a true saturated in water and buried in the darkness.

Is that a joke? It's hard to tell with creationists.

If you know he’s a creationist why do you think he’s joking?

​@Neptica that's the point, he could be an educated person, sarcastically mocking the professional liar in the video. The claim in the original comment is almost too stupid to be made seriously, but with creationists it's so hard to tell.

It is kinda hard to tell with these nut jobs.

I kinda want to know what @paulgarrett4474 asked... is this biting sarcasm, or wilful ignorance.

@@globalcoupledances I think he did, but not in so many words.

@@globalcoupledances too bad 500 million years ago never existed 🧐

​@@newcreationinchrist1423 😂

@@globalcoupledances LOL. But seriously now - On the grand scheme of things it's a really new book. Our universe is about 13.7 billion years old. The oldest section of the bible, the pentateuch, was compiled by 4 different authors about 3000 years ago, a few hundred years after the biblical "Moses" is presumed to have died. Whether or not he actually existed is unproven and open to debate. So after a stretch of just under 13.7 billion years, bible literalists and young earthers got into the game...late.

@@globalcoupledances does it now? We would disagree

We can trust it because it tells us to trust it😮😮😮😮

@@teddycooke8723 so are we to assume we can't trust it because you don't? Apparently you have a big ego.

Science, when done right, is simply a way to discover the way God designed things to be

@@eeveeofalltrades4780 evolution is not the way to go to figure it out

@@SK-bw2cv yeah, I know that

a complete and utter smack to AiG's BS.

And sadly they pride in their ignorance by spread anti-scientific falsehood.

@@lonnierh0dgejr41 and I did not even address the rock layers part of the argument. Hell my next angle of attack consists of biblical year counting and concluding that the Egyptians were already in Egypt building pyramids during the flood, and continued to do so during and after with no indication of any disturbance. Keep in mind that the Egyptians are supposedly descended from Noah's son Ham. Turns out that people have always been half decent at counting years, so the ages of many old kingdom pyramids are fairly easy to corroborate. So our biblical year counting exercise cannot accurately determine these historical facts. Which again results in the simple conclusion: interpreting genesis literally is a fool's game.

Two questions for you: 1. Which Version of the Bible are you using? 2. The Sumerian/Babylonian 'history' is based off of what, exactly? A topic for discussion: Why are the Sumerian/Babylonian people gone, and the Jews are not? They are Historically about as old as each other; with even the most God hating, evolutionist loving historians conceding the Lineage of Abraham (his ancestry and descendants) to be Historically accurate. Humans are incredibly good at Genocide, after all, and plenty of groups have disappeared over the years. 2000 years of Catholic persecution of Jews and dissident Bible believing Christians and they are still here. Against all odds.

Hebrew year is 355 days and they didn't have our Gregorian calendar months. "The Jewish calendar is lunisolar-i.e., regulated by the positions of both the moon and the sun. It consists usually of 12 alternating lunar months of 29 and 30 days each (except for Ḥeshvan and Kislev, which sometimes have either 29 or 30 days), and totals 353, 354, or 355 days per year."

What was his take on the origin of the "bing bang" again?

“Instead of believing what they knew was the truth about God, they deliberately chose to believe lies. So they worshipped the things God made but not the Creator himself, who is to be praised forever. Amen. That is why God abandoned them to their shameful desires…” (Romans 1:25, 26)

Carl Sagan over superstition every day!

@@MineCraft-nz9pg Man wrote the Bible and you are letting it run off with your mind into the world of superstition

@@zpt4862 ??? Whats your problem?

It's not God who made the mistake, it was the human. He regretted, but it was not a mistake. God has no power over your thoughts or your choices, man was created with free will.

@@reldintv That's not how "regret" works. If he regrets making humans, it means he's not sure he should have done so, or even thinks he shouldn't have. God can see the future, can he not? Supposedly, he has a detailed "plan". If so, then there is absolutely no free will in this scneario, since otherwise God could be wrong about the future.

@@antiHUMANDesigns nope, the complete thought is this. God regretted when He created man because they chose to live Evil. If humans just live righteously, God would not feel any regret when He created man. If man has no Free Will or Freedom of Choice, then man could not fall from sin. whether man finds joy or not in following Gods command, man has no choice but to obey God if we don't have that freedom of choice, then we are not humans but are robots that can be easily be controlled by its creator.

@@reldintv Indeed, God regretted the result of his creation. One again, this implies tha the wish he hadn't made humans. That's literally what it means. If someone can see the future, then the future is set, which means no one has the freedom to make other choices, because then God couldn't know the future.

The Flood was brought down upon the Earth because of the behavior of humans as Punishment. The concept of Human time has no correlation to the concept of God's Time. Reasonable thinking would therefore deduce that there should be all types of creatures fossilized in the Rock layers including mammals and humans. The Great Flood theory "Has To" to coincide with the existence of man and mammals or the story of Noah and the Ark is just that a story! Realistically Noone knows the truth. How about we all look within, find what gives each of us " Individual Peace" and then move on. Respect the choice others have made if different from yours and let us all coexist in the here and now. Faith should be an individual choice. There has been enough blood shed in the name of Religion to last for the rest of eternity. No matter what your choice, Believe it, Live it but never make anyone else suffer in any way because of it!

@@farplenorp yes it is because every single coral species alive today grows WAY TOO SLOW to be as large as the ones in big reefs today. if there was a flood it would have killed all coral worldwide so it would HAVE TO had grown to it’s size today in 6000 years. by every study done, disregarding christian studies because they start the study with bias and they all go against every other study done by real scientists, coral CAN NOT grow that fast. there’s a plethora of other reasons with the coral but i’m not going into that. the christian “science” book called “origins linking science and scripture” by ariel roth published in 1998 claims the fastest growing species of coral can grow from 26.4-43.2 cm per year. which he cites as from a 1968 paper called “comparative growth rates of some reef corals in the caribbean.” the max growth rate in that paper? 16.8cm a year. wildly different than roth’s claim and WAY to slow to support a 6000 year old earth. roth blatantly mis-cited the paper. now why would i trust other christian science books when it is so clear that they misrepresent information?

The catastrophic plate tectonics model would include a fair bit of warming up of the oceans so you would have more warm water in the past.

What are you talking about? Coral doesn't grow slowly, we've seen the great barrier reef grow bigger than recorded in 36 years.

@@chainingsolid it would have to be calm. and it would have to be the PERFECT salinity. if there was a global flood i doubt it would be calm but even if it were all the water would mix causing the salinity of the ocean to fall because it is being diluted by fresh water. coral is VERY sensitive to a change in salinity and would die.

@@Prince_Az_Myr citation needed. but yeah it probably has considering we’ve been polluting the ocean with sunscreen that destroys coral for decades it makes sense that the GBR has grown at a record pace recently since we’ve been switching to mineral sunscreen which isn’t harmful. but coral doesn’t grow fast it has a maximum rate of 2cm a year for non branching species which has been studied repeatedly. reefs just can’t be as big as they are if they started 6000 years ago.

Yet another reason why the South is the worst region of our country

What? Sorry I read and reread your comment I'm not wrapping my head around your misunderstanding of how things work were they fossils seashells or just normal sea shells I guess we can start there

​@@samrowe2889 Did you attempt to find out how they got there, or did you make an assumption?

​@@davekearney1944 evolutionists have their own assumptions on it but is just as easily explained by the Flood.

​@@anonymous01792 they're all over the world. Sea fossils on mountains.

We have the standard of God's word to help us understand. How blind we used to be.

there have been 7,000 plus gods that have been proposed by humans over time in hundreds of different languages and in hundreds of different countries.there is not and never has been the slightest evidence that any of them are real.we now know that the biblical creation story is just made up garbage.Adam and Eve never existed..there is no invisible lake of fire.no one ever walked on water.there have been a talking donkey or snake. no seas ever parted on human command no dead body rotting in scorching desert heat for days has ever revived..Christianity is a horribly immoral human blood sacrifice cult that should seen only in libraries in the section marked Mythology.

Which god though?

@@jerrylong6238 There's only one.

God is all feared for reasons, how many people died in order for us to have a from formation.... Again in the The Exodus , all the 1st born , al the way to Deuteronomy.. Then jashua over a quarter million throughout the land woman and children.....He is amazing Hes also very nosy,and awards with discipline according to His good pleasure..

@@evadeddeluge895 I don't fear god - I love him, he is my holy father. The god of the Old Testament was not really god

Sure they did. Dinosaurs existed millions of years ago. Man between 50,000 and 100,000 years.

Can't remember the verse, but in the bible there is something about a behemoth that was one of God's first creations, and the description was really close to a certain dinosaur

@@bisken6547 Close before or after we learned they looked more like birds?

@@bisken6547 No. The best explanation of leviathan and behemoth is the crocodile and hippo. Dinosaurs and humans were not contemporaries.

​@@davidcole1475 "Behold, Behemoth, which I made as I made you; he eats grass like an ox. Not a crocodile. He makes his tail stiff like a cedar; the sinews of his thighs are knit together. His tail is large like a cedar tree. Hippoes have a very small thin tail. So its not a hippo. From Job 41.

That's weird. It doesn't even stand now

​@@wyett123 we beg to differ.

@@SK-bw2cv of course you do. Yet you're the one picking and choosing what gods word is. From the very foundation of the Bible where some of "gods word" was purposely left out. To y'all ignoring where wearing mixed fabrics, eating shrimp or working the sabbath is a sin. Of which working the Sabbath you should be put to death.

@@wyett123 Let me guess, you think you are a talking Monkey, lol!

@@msmorgan45 😶 No! Humans are primates. -typically having flexible hands and feet with opposable first digits, good eyesight, and, in the higher apes, a highly developed brain: includes lemurs, lorises, monkeys, apes, and man. Do you think humans aren't animals?

Well an atheistic reasoning has similar leaps of faith. The big bang out of nothing cuz " it felt like it" the laws of physics just being right to create life billions of years later, assuming that things will continue to be the same as we expect just because it was like that a bit ago, all life developing from simple single cells while the entire planet was essentially a hell scape, hundreds of sediment layers with little to no erosion between layers" over millions of years" ext. Plus then you have to answer the not so fun questions about the meaningless of life and the lack of any real right or wrong or even if we actually exist at all. My point is that from either perspective we both have things we don't know and may never know but we take it "on faith" that what we do know can cover what we don't based on the trustworthiness of who said it.

lol, you mean the extreme mental gymnastics of confirmation bias and ascertainment bias that is the exceptionally flawed evolutionary theory that goes out of its way to ignore anything that contradicts its childish assertion that everything just magically assembled itself? lol, you can drop your pathetic excuse for faux superiority. You have none and it will get you exactly no where here.

@@therealreasons9141 The difference is normal folk think matter came from nothing but you folks think intelligence came from nothing.

I'm also fascinated by the level of crazy.

You cannot distinguish mental gymnastics from the scientific method. You are so lost that you can't see that evolutionists are using mental gymnastics instead of the scientific method Evolution is impossible and I think even you know it.

I spent 6 years studying Anthropology at a university full of people who automatically believed we came from apes and that the world was hundreds of millions of years old. They had no idea how to process it when I openly said I don't believe in these flimsy theories because they weren't used to being questioned. Their arguments unravel the more questions you ask about the subject.

@Karl Trapson They just believe we have a common ancestor, which is very likely if you look at the skeletons of a human and Chimpanzee. By the way we also have a vestigial tail.. why would god do that ?

@@Emiliocab47 Why would God do what exacly? Made tailbone so people can tell it's vestigial ?:P

Evolution does not teach we evolved from apes, it teaches we share common ancestor with them, which is why our DNA is 99% identical to them.

@@RozkminTo I was replying to Karl

Except none of it is true.

If you are to believe that the fossils all came from the Biblical Flood, why are there no fossils of any humans? After all, we are told the earth was flooded because of them?

John 11:25-26 New King James Version 25 Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live. 26 And whoever lives and believes in Me shall never die. Do you believe this?”

Savior from what? Lol

@@ProudHumanism Pride for starters...

​@@Brett.D There you go! Amen

​@@ProudHumanism why you think you are not a sinner like everyone else?

The part where there isn't enough water on Earth to do anything like that?

@@frosted1030 What? You're saying there isn't enough water to float rocks and sand and bones so they can land back on the continents? IF there isn't enough water on Earth to cover the Earth, then why are the "climate change" people worried about "rising sea levels?" Besides, the flood water didn't come from the Earth, it came from the sky. From the "Firmament." Firmament; From the old Norse "Fir" or wood, then from Old English "Ma" being short for mama or mother and "Ment" which is from the French derivation of the Latin "mentum" meaning, "result or product of the action." So "Firmament" means literally, "the result or product of the wooden mother's action." Obviously, the "Firmament" is a large wooden container in the sky which provided the water for the flood (the "mother" of the flood). I can't make it any clearer than that!

@@frosted1030 Don't mention that please. Somebody will then bring up all the water that was stored in the firmament, and then it all gets even more tedious.

@@davekearney1944 It sounds like the old heat problem. Just a cop-out.

@@frosted1030 nice presupposition

The Bible that goes back 4,000 years hasn’t been wrong and it’s A book of knowledge way before science books

@@laetitia9652 It was written by man who said they were divinely inspired by god to write it. You want evidence that they were divinely inspired by god to write the bible? Well I have bullet proof evidence. It says right in the words that they wrote that it was divinely inspired. You can't question that though you have to just take it on faith. I rest my case!

@@Tuoni996 that's the whole point of faith

@@Rikitangoable That's what scares me about religious nuts. Believing on faith the words of men written thousands of years ago. Then they point the finger at someone of another faith claiming the men who wrote their book were wrong. You've got to blindly take on faith the words that men who wrote MY book wrote or you'll spend eternity in a really bad place. It's ridiculous.

@@Tuoni996 that to me is like taking one bad apple and calling the rest of them rotten

If you are to believe that the fossils all came from the Biblical Flood, why are there no fossils of any humans? After all, we are told the earth was flooded because of them?

What made you think that dinosaurs were not included in the ark? Are you looking for the biggest dinosaurs inside the ark? Noah doesn't need to bring the biggest one. Noah was told to bring animals of their kind. So seven pairs of dog will suffice. Seven pairs of cats will suffice. Did Noah collect all of them from all over the world? No. The bible said that the animals went to Noah by themselves. Why are there soft tissues of t-rex dinosaurs found in their bones if they are 300 million years old already? Did the soft tissues miraculously survive for 300 million years or are those dinosaur bones not really that very old as scientists want to claim? You know which is the more plausible answer. There are even stegosaurus carved in the Angkor Wat temple. That is proof that the humans who built the Angkor Wat have seen the stegosaurus which is supposed to have lived 160 million years ago. Was the Angkor Wat built 160 million years ago or was the stegosaurus alive on the 12th century (when the Angkor Wat was built)?

​@@wavemaker2077 you should get your information from actual scientists rather than creationist propaganda outlets. Everything you wrote here is wrong.

​@@wavemaker2077 no t-rex was alive 300 millions years ago, they appeared hundreds of millions of years later, lol

@@randomusername3873 lol. Scientists found soft tissues from the bones of t-rex. Time to wake up. We have been lied for too long. You are so fast asleep that you think everything that was thought to you especially about science is correct.

There was no ark or flood. Please grow up.

That’s what blew my mind when I started asking questions. They just accept it as “scientifically established”….

Please do some reading. No reputable scientist has ever said that dirt falls from the sky. It sounds like something you've heard from a creationist geologist. Get both sides and decide for yourself.

"They act like dirt just falls from the sky and covers everything" Well there's a surprise! That's how it works in my house.

Have you ever seen the aftermath of a flood? really! Dirt is moved by the force of water. but yes dirt is moved by air as well just not as much. geologist talk about sediment all of the time which is dirt! This is why we find citied under dirt . God bless you!

​@@thomasmaughan4798 😂😂😂word

Jah bless

What does the jab have to do with God?

​@@mobrocket Nothing. He only made word associations. There is no logical progression.

''For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.'' John 3:16-17🙏🕊

@@mobrocket - He means he trusted God with his life instead of a shot.

Millions trusted God before vaccines but millions perished. Did your parents just trust God or did they take you to the doctor and get you vaccinated as a child?

Your "evolution" has been debunked and your lies revealed. Cope harder.

Try it

- South Park wins that race

We can't even travel past our moon and you creatures want to tell us how old the earth is by using your "reliable" theories lol.

@@JohnjOcampo yeah it’s called mathematics

@@brandon_945 it's called a theory.

@@JohnjOcampo math is not theory

@@brandon_945 your basic understanding of the cosmos is.

Man, you really unpacked it. Are you studying the subject or is this purely out of interest that you know all of this?

@@area-xp3sw I was just searching for the truth and found something about AMS dating that just does not fit.... Looked into it in more depth and found why... I have talked to quite a few so called "experts" in the field and not a one could explain this discrepancy. The truth is out there you just need to look.

Do you know all dinosaur fossils have carbon-14 in them? infact the amount is delta 2-3 which is less than 35000 years old. they cannot be older than 50000 years because C14 has half life 5730 years. there would be zero C14 left even after 100000 years. The reason they didn't carbon date dinosaur bones is they thought that they would find EXACTLY NO C14 (because of the ASSUMPTION that they would be old) . This is very rare that someone gets the permission to carbon date them.This also explains why we find dinosaur tissue and even blood cells , osteocytes etc . There is LOADS OF C14 in dinosaurs. Also diamonds and coal have C14(less studies on those so far). WHICH IS WHAT YOU SHOULD EXPECT IF THE EARTH IS YOUNG, AND COAL WAS CREATED FROM DEAD PLANTS AND ANIMALS WHICH WERE RAPIDLY BURIED.(yes, you can very quickly create coal under high pressure). Also if the earth were young this automatically solves the 35000 years -6000 years discrepancy(since c14 couldnt fully form in the atmosphere to as much as it is now yet when the dinosaurs died)

A good geochronometer must either have little to no initial incorporation of the daughter isotope or must have a fixed ratio from which the radiogenic and nonradiogenic proportions can be determined. For example, common-Pb (or the natural occurrence of non-radiogenic lead) includes radiogenic isotopes (206, 207, 208) as well as non-radiogenic isotopes (204). If the ratio of these is constant or measurable, then we can separate the radiogenic from the non-radiogenic to extract meaningful age information.

@@jvowen6555 "If the ratio of these is constant or measurable" And how can you be sure of this constant? Constant over what time frame, a few observed hours or days? Certainly not over millions of years. Clearly this is an assumption... One that cannot be confirmed... Even with this method the starting ratios must still be assumed.. If there was any parent isotope in the mix at all it would invalidate the results...

Yes I totally agree.

Whether you believe in a god or not is irellevant, Earth's measurably old. Period.

Your God did not create itself, right? There's one thing your god did not create. Maybe there's more!?

@@drewdrake9130 I wanna know what it created everything from. There was nothing and suddenly there was a lot of stuff. Did he create the entire universe out of nothing?

Story of his life is, he's a con artist!

​@JustMe-mn5hk why?

He worked in Australia for years for Creation ministries b4 going to USA about 20 years ago

@@JustMe-mn5hk Says Who? YOU? And you are?

Yes me, me and thousands upon thousands up actually true scientist! Have a wonderful day

Top of giza pyramids have erosion too

Millions zillions of years

A 2500+ year old book written by man that claim that you just have to take it on faith that god told them to write it and then point to the very book they wrote saying that it says god said they wrote?? Can't be wrong. No siree

bUT i’Ts GOd’S wOrD!!!!!!!!!

not really. it relies on a middling understanding of the subject. he overlooks or downright ignores a lot of facts in order to come up with his conclusion. not a good look.

@@cagneybillingsley2165 name one proven fact that disproves this

@@globalcoupledances we weren’t alive back then it wouldn’t make sense to us

I've had a vision, you need to repent and follow the one true God. The god of Gods, The God Who created everything. He was revealed to me in a vision, and told me to tell the world, to be a prophet for truth. Yahweh was indeed Satan. That's why he has no idea how the world works. He was not blessed with that knowledge, my God kept that Knowledge from him to show mankind how foolish it is to follow a false god. All the pain and suffering and misery in the world is created by Yahweh.

​@@globalcoupledances yes because we still have them today

One of the things they will never get. They dont even think a bit. Still most of the population believes a creator, most of the scientists still believe in god. Most of scientific theories, discoveries,developments made by theists even most of the time directly from clergy, including the ones they fiercly object. Yet they talk like science is enemy of God and lead by atheists

buahahaha I think the same thing

I totally agree. Glad there is someone on this comment section with common sense.

why?

Agreed. As a Christian and former Creationist, the arguments aren't strong enough. I'm not on board with evolution totally because the gap between humans but I believe the world is much older until proven otherwise. But I don't get why so many Christians focus on the wrong thing. It's about Jesus Christ and nothing else. Who cares if the world is 6k years old or 4.6 billion years old. Also, the bible has many parables or things that weren't to be taken literal unless Jesus specifically says it. This gets so many Christians sidetracked from what we need to focus on. That's Jesus Christ.

@@MrTadas21 Because he's blind

If you're always tolerant and open to all ideas, then you never believe the truth. You will always reject it while entertaining various conflicting views. Why bother with such a goal?

Scratch the 1st Question. I just discovered Guy Berthault’s work on that exact subject. 👍

Well it certainly makes people self-important

@@ClementGreen huh

@@Fricc-sg4np Well when people say God's word is important, what they usually mean is My word's important.

@@ClementGreen well i am sorry that is how people made you feel. That is not my intention. Sometimes Christians(myself included) and people who claim to be Christians arent wise with their words or actions. If you wanted to actually have a conversation about it I would be happy to. I dont have all the answers, but ill help if i can.

@@Fricc-sg4np Well you do seem to be a genuine believer, as they're always very modest and self-effacing. They just happen to be on a mission from the creator, or God has singled them out for special attention - usually in the form of a divine experience. They like to spread the word, because it's mandated, and also because if other people believe it, then it's more likely to be true. I'd love to know if you disagree with any of the above. Please add more. I'm very interested in religions, as I like a laugh. But I can also see that they are very dangerous. For example, the Putin cult in Russia. I genuinely only wish to increase my understanding of the whole subject. So yes please tell me what you think I should know.

ACTUALLY no. Check out the fossil record at Joggins NS (Canada) on the internet. Simple evidence tying together 50+ feet of sedimentary layers.

Science can always take two sides.. science used to believe and teach that the earth was flat to. If you want real proof that God exists, then ask God to come into your life. You have to be open to God being real for God to come.. we can't be parent'd if we don't come home right or wrong ? So think of God as a scientific experiment.. without all the information you actually cannot prove that God is not real. So on behalf of science believe in him whole heartedly reach out to him and tell him how confusing it is to even begin to believe and you could use a bit of proof...ask him to prove himself to you but do it with your heart. If you do it with you brain and the dount you already have then theres your answer. Tell him that you are willing and open and you want God to come into your life think of him through your heart try not to not think of him with your brain it'll get you nowhere.. I grew up protestant meaning I think I went to church twice in my life we never talked about God it wasn't in our house there was no Bible no pictures of Jesus nada... and when I was approximately 40 years old which is 12 years ago I wanted to know if God was real and this is what I did and sure enough I promise you with every fiber of my being and I swear on my my son's life God is real! O felt completely stupid talking to god bcz i disnt know him.. I may as well have been speaking Cantonese that's how foreign it was. I was sitting in a room by myself and I put my hands in the air and I said why can't you reveal yourself to me I don't see what the big deal. Everybody says you are real why can't you be real to me… and I was in no particular mood at all I was very mundane hum drum in fact very low of energy and I promise you that in the moment's going forward I felt this amazing energy come into the room. Well there was with this force entering my body and all of a sudden my mouth was pulled back to a smile as big as acheshire cat. He was literally pulling at my cheeks. I couldn't have frowned for a million dollars I was astonished at the feeling of love that was filling up my body. That grew and grew and I was like oh my Lord you are here I can actually feel your presence and it made me stand I was feeling so glorious and attached to that energy that power that was in that room the holy spirit as they call it.. as I now call it. Further more. ... why wouldn't you want to find out and have the greatest power the universe has ever given us which the creator of it all.. Why omit life after death when all you have in believing evolution is a worm filled body and nothing. An eternity of emptiness. What's the point of that? Where as I get to live forever.. in his kingdom. Why..bcz it's written his book. It says clearly that the only way to the father is through Jesus. So you don't get to go through life not believing in Jesus and get to go to God and heaven doesn't work like that. It is a blind faith that your loan is secured. It is true that faith that you will have a relationship with him that's all he wants. It doesn't need you to go to church he doesn't need you to walk around preaching all day religion to religion religion he just wants to have a relationship with you. I start everyday with gratitude and I thank him for my life I thank him for food clothing and shelter in my health I thank him for every blessing that I ever have every moment of breath is his gift. The fact that you were even born is a miracle and should be considered impossible since you were one of a few trillion sperm but you somehow managed to come out of your mother's room and land on some rock floating through infinite space you're already proving that God is real because mathematically it's already impossible. And everything written in that Bible is true. You know they found Noah's Ark. Ontop of Mount Ararat in turkey. They did a 3-D image and wouldn't you know it it is of perfect dimension the exact same footage and cubic circumference described in The Bible and in the exact location The Bible says it would be... Sure some local evolutionary scientists said it's just rock formation but yet other experts say no I'm sorry that type of formation at that altitude on that mountain is extremely impossible to explain.. The 3-D imagery also shown is things that were described to be on Noah's Ark. That were the nails of keeping the ship together and that type of material would not have been found on the top of the mountain buried for hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of years.. May you find God now.. its incredible once you do bcz I haven't felt along ever since and I've felt incredible moments with God.. Ps. Don't ever discount something just bcz its easy to do so... can you prove to me that you love your mom or your dad or maybe a child if you have one? Nope. You can't prove love to anybody yet it's real isn't it.. Do you know that the human brain is only a system's operator. That's all it does is operate all of your systems in your body and save memories and data like a computer. But science cannot explain the part about where hope comes from perseverance courage the willingness to go on the ability to heal ourselves the ability to push forward joy sadness, they the excitement of life or for anythig at all.. All those things come from your God. You know the instinct when you know something is gonna happen or you knew something would work out where you said to yourself ooh that doesn't feel right. You questioned it bcz something inside of you told you.. your brain can't do any of those things nor can sci3nxe explain where they cone from. Alll of those are your godshot moments that's God coming to you and you dont even know. Ask science to prove any of that... they cant.. ill pray for you.. humble yourself amd get on your knees, get out of entitlement and walk into gratitude. Ask him to come into your life. Sorry I've gone on so long but there's one more thing. You want to know what I've noticed in life is that when someone is at their most weakest moment of their life maybe their child is sick and hospital on life support or with leukemia I loved one is on their deathbed.. It's then do you see everybody on their knees saying please God if you are real please please save my child's life please God if you're real I've never asked you for anything in my life but I'm begging you now please come and save my child! Now why would an atheist do that? Because I believe that we instinctively all know where we are from and when we are at our weakest moment do we call out to our father. No one ever needs God unless they have suffered or are suffering it turns out.. But the Lord giveth and the Lord take it away... praise him. Good luck.

The sedimentary process time is a theory. There was no proven evidence about the exact time. And the time is relative. For example, some chemical mineralization can happened in a matter of months.

And perhaps in tectonic movements, depends on how we perceived the ground zero to the first creation which nobody knows. There are still mysteries unsolved. We should test ourselves. I studied geology. So often I questioned these kind of stuffs that seem hard to correlate. As time goes by, my faith has grown to have the better sense.

Even the great Stephen Hawkins said before his death that with all that we know about mankind space the Earth none of it would be possible without "him"... May you find the Lord now

​@@globalcoupledances universities are woke camps, getting a degree or passing a class means nothing.

@@globalcoupledances i don't care about money or status, i care about the truth. I bet your the same fool who thinks 75% of water wouldn't be able to engulf the entire 25% of land lol. In fact there's is so much water on earth that there are vast stores of groundwater in the cracks and crevices of earth's crust.

@@JohnjOcampo what do you mean?

Does it make sense to you that animals can bring forth animals that are not of their kind? Cats giving birth to dogs? That's what evolution teaches, and you might claim I don't understand it. Elaborate: Evolutionists claim we didn't come from monkeys, but that we ARE monkeys because they know how unscientific it is for a kind to not bring forth after their kind. But they still have a problem, they believe our common ancestor is a germ. How does ONE germ produces that much genetic information of kinds and then from one kind to another giving birth to what is not after their kind. That's not science, that's science fiction.

⁠@@caleburias5596oh hi, it’s you again. You made this dumbarse question under a different comment and I thought you were joking. You must be really simple. ‘Kind’ in reference to animals is a biblical term, it’s not used in evolutionary biology. That alone tells me that your entire education on the subject comes from religious institutions. Oh and we are not a type of monkey, we are an ape. A very specific type of ape, an African Ape. I know, I know, religious simpletons like you think they are all the same ‘kind’. It’s sad how uneducated so many Americans are. How on earth you guys put a man on the moon is beyond me.

​@@casualviewing1096am gonna give calebu a like as a reward for his stupidity, dat ok?

​@caleburias5596 Where did the lie that evolution teaches animals can give birth to different animals start? Honestly it's disturbing how many people bought that BS from whoever perpetuated that lie. Evolution occurs in populations, not individuals, and species don't give birth to other species, they diversify in distinct populations due to selection pressures over time, similar to how language evolved in populations of humans over time. No latin speaking parent gave birth to a child who spoke Italian, yet Italian comes from Latin.

How like a door the knowledge we gain, Which door is on the bourne of the Inane. It opens and our nothingness is closed; It closes and in darkness we remain. Why delve then in the sod, or search the sky For Truths, alas! Which neither you or I Can grasp, scince Death alone the Secret keeps And will impart it to us by and by. Al-ma'rri

If you are to believe that the fossils all came from the Biblical Flood, why are there no fossils of any humans? After all, we are told the earth was flooded because of them?

@@pakkiderm There were no humans around when dinosaurs roamed the earth

the age of the universe is now 26 billion years old that's double from 13.7 billion. so, nothings written in stone here.

they are definitely headed somewhere. they might want to go ahead and be fitted for their millstone.

@@norbertjendruschj9121 why is that funny, unless you know a person's mind why jump to conclusions?

@@norbertjendruschj9121 I am responding to you responding to Brandon Macey´s post so obviously I have read it. You have not answered my question? I asked why it was funny? I assume you have a problem with this person quoting from this book then?

@All About Britain speculation is what evolution, big bang, and abiogenesis are.

@All About Britain semantics police diatribe alert

​@@norbertjendruschj9121 the lecture is straight up truth that cannot be refuted.

@@norbertjendruschj9121 why not. writing inside a Egyptian pyramid is evidence.

@@norbertjendruschj9121 sure, within translations.

​@@norbertjendruschj9121 "scripture is not evidence" According to atheists who don't want to believe the bible.

@@bigdaddyleroy1915 The vast majority of the Bible is written by fictional authors about fictional characters, events, places, historical time-lines, magic and wizards, etc. Rarely does ANYTHING remotely support the Bible outside the Bible

Exactly it would give inaccurate results and we don’t carbon date them!

My point

​@@Specogecko the problem is they actually find carbon in dinosaur fossils. If dinosaurs are as old as evolutionists claim they are they would have none.

@@newcreationinchrist1423 never said there wasn’t carbon in fossils….

@@newcreationinchrist1423 Maybe find out how carbon dating works before you comment lol

Things that die in a normal process are not fossilized though.

@@Juraikken So that means some would still exist, not none.

@@BoneFrossil but none exist beneath the layer of fossils. Hence the lowest layer is the flood year.

There never was a global flood, stop believing in fairy tales.

As for points 2&3, Adam and Eve weren’t created as babies so why do you think the Earth and everything on it would be created as newborn? Haven’t checked the veracity of the first one yet.

Lots of good points here. 👍

@@neptica9926 there’s another problem. If the flood resets the human population to around a handful of persons, how did it reach the 150-300 million only 2000 years later? That’s a factor of ~30 million in 2000 years. Note that in the following 2000 years until today the population only increased by a factor of ~50 despite the highest growth rates ever observed in human history.

Main problem is you're using reason to question unreasonable statements.

Excellent points all. no doubt. I think it is simply important to point out all the issues with evolution, whether geological, cosmological or biological. I don't necessarily think the flood in the absolute biblical sense is the answer either. Problems in current theories are abound. We have already seen since JWT hit space that current cosmological models are full of issues. Dogma in current accepted science is also a thing.

How exactly does that refute evolution?

​@@orionlax626 where are these hybrids? Did we all of sudden went from swinging on trees to making fire?

@@JohnjOcampo I don't think you understand evolution or even know what a hybrid is. Maybe read a book on it?

@@orionlax626 i understand it perfectly and i knew I'd be waiting for an answer, typical atheist who believes his past family ancestors were fishes and monkeys lol.

@@JohnjOcampo You don't understand perfectly. Stop being so arrogant and do some actual research on the subject.

C'mon man;) you really think you can argue with beliefs? Especially if this can make you immortal?

You should post examples of changes in morphology and transitional fossils.

Where did DNA and genetic information come from to produce the amount of variety and support evolution?

Pls provide an objective experiment that was done where one specie turning into another specie. Darwin claimed all sorts of imaginative theories like monkey becoming man to fish becoming man proving that he cannot even stay in one lane and unable to prove any of it.

Bravo

Yes, but never in the same geological layer as any of the organisms mentioned in this lecture. Almost as if they existed at completely different times.

The guy gave tons of observable evidence. You can’t repeat history in a laboratory, but have to see which worldview makes best sense of all the evidence.

@@MichaelSeethaler We repeat history in laboratories pretty consistently. He gave observable evidence, yes but nothing that is rational or proof of his claims, all he did was point to something claim it meant X and then said this proves Y is false but that's not thee scientific method, and it's pathetic to try to reduce rational thought to that level.

​@@jnewgot observable evidence is science too men, i dont know why you use your tone. S cience is too big to just name it

@@jesusdelmas Doing 1 part of a complex system is not "being scientific". Edit: As for the "tone", that's your reading bias, I have literally no control over that.

​@@jnewgot as with all these cuc's, they're too busy digging into the ground to prove the existence of God and not digging into the human heart. They will achieve nothing, they will change very few minds, and no hearts. I would tend to side with the people who laugh at these apologist trying to prove everything. The proof that God exists is more like David Wilkerson prophesying that in less than one generation, there would be five hundred fires burning out of control in the Middle East during a war. He predicted that 1981, and during the Iraqi war in the early 90s, 501 oil wells to the number we're burning out of control in Kuwait. The proof that God exists is the fact that the church in China still exists. There's a lot of crazy stories about how the believers their get together while being infiltrated by government agents and still they're not caught because nobody communicates where the next meeting will be, yet they all know where to show up because God tells them. It is an experience, and extremely unlikely coincidence has piled on top of each other to such an extent that other explanations fail. You will find nothing in the natural world that definitively proves or disproves how it was or was not created.