DANG IT YOU MADE ME THINK OF RICK MAY NOW IM SAAAAD

Torper Vazquez Outside. Got a 78 octillion player base really recommend it just don’t play as the human species not worth it

E

Let's rework the stats... took those points from defense and pour it into agility XD

There's a polish tank called PL-01 that relies on stealth instead of heavy armor.

further proof that octopuses are just like humans

Octopus:- Oh, I miss those hats. But, as it turns out, hard, pointy things tend to hurt the head. A Random Nautilus:- HEY! YOU TAKE THAT BACK!

styling' on em!

What is the name o "hat inside"?

Woah... When you think about it, evolutions are just things going out of fashion!

Bald And Brash

Phono Mono; why don’t you have more likes? 😂

The Imperfect God more like, belongs in the trash!

@@theimperfectgod7140 more like, belongs in the trash

Morpheu. ......

Except we still rely heavily on armour. The only difference is that instead of wearing the armour, we now drive inside of it.

@Question Question Well, yeah, there's that as well, but it's not the same per se. Bullet-resistant vests on today's infantrymen definitely lower the death toll significantly and are important, but the difference between wearing it and not wearing it isn't as stark as it used to be. A common soldier uses cover and doesn't rely on his armour to protect him, as it's specifically a last resort, unlike an average medieval soldier who very much did rely on that, very much incorporating it into their way of fighting. Modern tactics would be no different irregardless of if the soldiers wore armour or not, while medieval tactics had a very special role for men with heavy armour. From that perspective, tanks and armoured vehicles suit the role of plate armour a lot better.

@@justiniani.4501 ok and what about helmets to resist bullets, armor that can save you from an explosion and these things called *"shoes that are there to protect your feet from nails"*

@@eeenriquegabrielnegro8167 A helmet is a piece of protection. Same as the body armour, it's a last resort protection that cannot be relied on like a suit of armour was. It's literally the same as mentioning the protective clothing. One helmet does not change the soldier's role on the battlefield, and same goes for the shoes. You don't suddenly get the tank role because you wear them, you are still used as a basic infantryman. I'm the past, armour was a notable distinction that would put you either on the heavy infantry camp or the light infantry camp. Heavy infantry would be wearing heavy armour and holding the lines with their warm bodies and swallowing most of the damage while light infantry would be used for flanking maneuvers and supporting the lines. Today, the role of heavy infantry does not even exist, or at the very least, it's not determined by armour, because the role of damage absorbers is, again, fulfilled by tanks, not humans.

@@justiniani.4501 Example the light hawk XT its considered heavy armor tho its light weight

Conner Veit id thought u said Netherlands

hahahah :'D

And then it started to get eaten by sperm whales

It's so dark!!

Why?

TierZoo you here .

watch how the turtle got its shell... it definitely is in a similar vain.

Can't believe my lad has good taste too, bless up💯💯

TierZoo are you gonna do a meta breakdown of the Permian era?

Keep on keepin’ on

*slurp*

*DO NOT HARM THE CONES*

OF DEATH

Evolving into monsterous 10+ meter deepsea creatures that are highly aggressive and even give spermwhales, their natural enemies, a good fight

Epic Teletubby r/cursedcomments

Agreed - this was made by turtle gang

@Guythatlikesmint Official Absolutely my dudes - this was made by clam gang

Imagine not being able to get thru small holes - this was made my slug gang

Hell yeah. -This was made by Nautilus gang.

Pffft, losers without shells are soo trashy. -this was made by armadillo gang

Iain Hansen I love this comment.

That is just a lie! They widened their ribs or something and then... I don't remember! The episode was a while ago. Turtles are many things, but they are not shellfish! :)

Benjamin Olsson thanks captain obvious

I mean it is Turtles All The Way Down...infinite turtles require a lot of shells, probably

Benjamin Olsson It was a joke

We have no fossil evidence of creatures confirmed to be giant squid relatives. There are known cephalopods from the Cretaceous that looked similar to Architeuthis, but they lived in shallow seas and appear to be more closely related to Vampyroteuthis. We thus have no evidence of how Architeuthis evolved and what their ancestors were.

We do know that there are giant squids in the deep parts of the ocean.not as large as they used to give a still larger than the squids near the surface. Hypothesis are they need to be that big to withstand the pressure of deep sea or are that big to have more volume compared to surface area so that way they can withstand the cold. But we don't really know why sea creatures in the deep get so big.

Giant squids are giant due to deep sea gigantism.

@@builderslapper yes but what I was referring to theories what causes deep sea gigantism.

Stretchy boi

is that how squidward got his name? or just a coincidence?

@@ElLoboLoco622 squidward most likely comes from squid + edward

Ask those goon turtles

Harmed crabs

LOL

Dat mean fisho man-guy-woman-girl-boy-child-thing

@@reberhardt111 wtf😂

Hold my shell

It’s funny cuz I’m pretty sure the fish were actually considered the weirdos on the block at the time, at least for a long while. Wasn’t really til the invention of Jaws, I believe, that fish began to T pose on the oceans

You spontaneously anagram famous musicians when your brain stops working?

same

I laughed way too hard at this.

@@PennyDreadful1 okay, I laughed really hard at the original comment, but yours had me literally wheezing. Thank you for the laughter, kind stranger.

Hello friend my old darkness

“Not anymore there’s a blanket”

I see, you're a man of culture as well.

I watched that once, but lost it, can somebody put a link under this of my comment and like my comments comment or comment so I can see, thanks XD

@@scottashorn3636 Intredasting

Scott Ashorn search “bill wurtz” on youtube, hes the dude who made it.

Mine does, Idk what is up with your ice cream dude

Lovecraft Country!

Clearly you're not familiar with Japanese ice cream...

Mine had HAIR! Didn't stop me from eating it tho!

@@Im-Not-a-Dog oh no

Lol

Isnt Zoidberg more a crab than an Octopodidae?

Sorry, this is Terran Bio-history. Xeno-Bio-History would be another video.

@@archdux did some one say EXTERMINATUS!?

Zoiberg is crustacean

Well whom ever had the idea for this topic, I thank you also. I have been collecting sphooceras for years. It allways struck me as odd that there shell was allways blunt. Now I know the reason for this and its name. Great artist painting as well.

Yes, thank you as well. This was an extremely interesting topic that I did not know that much about. It was fascinating!

To be fair... I'm not quite so full of myself that I think they just did this topic because I asked for it. I commented about cephalopods several times and mentioned the crystallized bone of a cephalopod that I held in a college class about a decade ago, that filled me with tons of awe. I also partly just struck a real silly fan boy tone because, hey, it's supportive of the show, and also, hey, I'm happy to be reminded of how I'm a bit of a fanboy for this show in general. Thanks again :)

Where and/or how do you collect ancient squid fossils? Because that sounds like something I wanna do.

Ɛ>

They should definitely do a video on that too 🤣

• 流 浪 者 • wtf I read how liquid lost its shell 😂😂😂

No, you read that right

It's definitely not working properly

That's a gas

Lol?????

Yep!

It him thoo

🤣

Didnt your dad make it?

Its not a school's responsibility to tell you exactly why squids lost their shells. And you'd probably still complain if they did.

Americas public education system hasn't changed in over 100 years. It was designed to pump out factory workers to manufacture goods for the war effort, more or less. It definitely wasn't designed to make children intelligent, thoughtful, or self sufficient. Some of the greatest, if not *most* of the greatest minds of the 20th century had a loathing disdain for public education. It's not a place for smart people.

@@normanclature9819 Are you trying to debate evolution?

If u take marine bio u learn this u just have to apply yourself

Zachary Ward some schools don’t offer that. That’s also another problem, inconsistency in the school system.

Eyyyyyyyyyyyyy

PBS is going to be entertaining me from cradle to grave

I'd say the guys actually doing the research are making the world better

"pbbbt" -this was made by squid gang

😂😂😂😂

Thomas Melone. Evolution is, by definition, alteration from direct repetition of cycle. Within life (biology), such changes are called biological evolution. There are various and overlapping theories on why such change in life occurs over time. Charles Darwin offered one theory (evolution through natural selection). The ever expanding field of genetics (pioneered by Brother Mendel) offers further insights. A man called Lamarck also offered theories on how adaptive and imitative behaviors might imprint upon physiology and then be passed on and amplified over successive generations (giraffes stretch their own necks). Although long sidelined, with recent findings on neuro-physio plasticity and epigenetics, such ideas are also being increasingly considered and reseached. Simply put, the myriad of forms in the heritage of life are beyond the constraints of a single book.

change in allele frequency, yes.....change from one species to another no. The Cambrian explosion is direct evidence against macroevolution. What we see in the fossil record is overwhelming stasis. Which is why the absurd idea of punctuated equilibrium was put forth. DNA is inert and could never form on its on. Impossible without the help of intelligence. Not ro mention if you did have information that record, edit, and translate/copy itself you would still need a cell for it to have any function. The ultimate chicken and the egg in nature. So the reason some people reject TOE is because when you scratch the surface of the theory it is full of wholes. Very, very far from fact.

+Steve Steverson Which is why self-reinforcing chemical reactions is the current topic of research when it comes to the origin of life. There are plenty of geological processes/structures which could/can concentrate pro-biological molecules - water pockets in soil/sediment/sand, crevices in rocks, etc.. There have been a few self-catalysing chemical cycles uncovered as well - i.e. a sequence of reactions which produce more and more of all their components. Sure it's not a whole cell yet but it took a billion years over the whole planet for a cell to arise just once. So the fact that such an event hasn't been replicated in the few hundred labs over the past few decades is hardly evidence that is can't have happened. "DNA is inert and could never form on its on." I think you'll find DNA is forming on it's own in you body right now. It definitely isn't inert, in fact most people argue that DNA is too unstable for chromosome-length molecules to remain intact until cell capable of homeostasis existed. Though it is all beside the point because an RNA-world where by RNA would both be the information-storing and metabolic enzymes of the first cell-like structures is much more likely. "true" cells with DNA for information storage and proteins for metabolic enzymes would have evolved later.

Keep learning, it gets better and better!

Evolution is a fact. The people who dismiss it as "only a theory" have no idea what a theory is.

Jaiden Lang don't they?...

Isolation party 5:46

RevolvingWorld i would argue the gladius is an internal shell but whatever

Potato Durp it's a vestigial shell. They didn't lose it, they modified it.

Last time i was this early *BANG*

Isamare &Matt MDM1984(Google Man)

It's evolving!

Why. Its not like there is something preventing further change winthin a species

@Grenherb another study says that 99 % of all animals that ever lived are extinct. I need ur sources our in information is conflicting.

4HorsemenCome I’m sorry but making a random claim and proclaiming it’s a fact on the internet without evidence does not make it a fact. In fact you are very wrong. Also “kind” is a pseudoscientific term. Not scientific in the least it is a “term” made up by imbecilic creationists. Nice try tho.

Insane what happens in 100,000's of years

4HorsemenCome source.

Finally someone said it

Yeah climate change is rising the sea levels, can’t wait for inklings to be a real thing in the future

@@joeydovey2425 but it'll take 1000s of years

@@haruhisuzumiya6650 i'll wait.

Haruhi Suzumiya more like millions it took us 30 million years just to get into the Stone Age

Bro, that's deep

Deep like the sea

Abandoned¯\_(ツ)_/¯ maybe?

yes

when you're too heavy and becomes a burden, someone will leave you

Yes, it is terrifying. Imagine what we haven't found fossils for..

Clean I have dubbed it the little Squid-gnome.

XD

What flavour of ice-cream would you like? We have chocolate, vanilla, strawberry, mint, orange sherbet, and Lovecraftian Horror! You'd be surprised how popular that last one is. People don't think we actually mean it! :)

Haha yeah

Sounds hilarious

Sea gnome

Congrats on your transformation! 👍🏻👊🏻

Squids = Sea Gnomes. This is my head cannon now.

Keemstar on the sea

gabriel gionet yes!

Deserts are generally freezing at night

i believe conifers had a similar thing happen where their adaptations to arid climates helped in the effectively dry cold winters they are associated with now, though they still live in deserts as well.

Woomy!

*woomy intensifies*

😂😂😂🤣

Johanna Schmid What, what is woomy?

@@theleanbusinessman5431 a noise

Muscle Hank haha I love your pic 🤣

Now its shell is dating a hermit crab.

Oddly poetic.

That was great

Deep

I Hope so. Much more skilled educators on KZfaq than I ever had in U.S. public schools (and I went to a well funded high school, where everything was a repeat from what I learned as a little kid watching PBS and going to mueseums and reading)

I think it makes a lot of sense. Most children younger than 12 aren't fully able to understand or contextualize latin names and biological (taxonomical) rank.

Why the upper limit of 17? That makes no sense.

Person Mcface Because 12-17 is just an estimate for the ages of kids when they begin to learn about more detailed sciences. Again, it's an estimate. There's not an exact minimum or maximum age that determines when students begin to hear about this stuff.

Do octopuses have bones? I always thought that they had cartilage.

correction: they used to be INSIDE of the magical beings of the deep waters. :-)

Also octopuses don't have internal shells OR cartilage

octopuses are the only cephalopod to have no remainder of their shell whatsoever, what you're finding is either a cuttlebone or squid 'pen'

Do you mean cuttlefish? The flat, white, chalky stuff that you can give to budgies? Octopus don’t have bones, their only hardened body part is their beak.

Yes I agree that would make a great video. There are still remnants of early hexapods like (I think) Jumping Bristletails.

Yeah, I've always found this fascinating. Most animals that gain wings do so by adapting their forelimbs. But insects didn't, so they just have the wings in addition to all their legs.

Or talk about how they shrank, and use to be as big as cats.

Red Bull

Jack Kraken hahahaha i get it now, thanks

Shagadelic! Baby

IIRC they're just generally outcompeted by placental mammals, who are able to gestate more young at once, give birth to better prepared young, etc.

Please!

Grym Gungus Australia split off so marsupials there had no competition whereas marsupials in other continents died off thanks to mammals.

Marsupials are mammals. You mean placental mammals.

I also would like a video on it, but in short, because they had few competition from other mammals. Australia had no mammals except marsupials and monotremates until the arrival of humans. That's why there is so much diversity of marsupials there. And south america had only marsupials, xenarthra (sloths, anteaters and armadillos) and other groups of mammals who are now extinct. Mammals like rodents, primates and felines arrived in south america relatively recently: when the Americas came together. It was also at this time that marsupials and xenarthra invaded north america. However competition and predation from the newly arrived mammals made marsupial numbers dwindle greatly (as well as other mammals native to South America, who went extinct around this time). In all other continents marsupials faced competition from other mammals, better adapted to their niches, and therefore more efficient, and that's why you don't see marsupials anywhere else, they went extinct when they faced competition from other mammals.

Boom12 you too XO love Ryan I am

Bruh, they had tons of changes and where just as diverse as their Dinosaur and Pterosaur cousins. Look at Armadillosuchus,Kaprosuchus,Metrorhychus,Nundasuchus, and other ancient crocodilmorphs.

I used to think that crocodiles and alligators were the same

sine moderamine - That's some Grade A pun slingin'.

Implying that's not what they are now...

João Pedro yes!

For a very brief moment I read that as the name of a Pokemon.

What makes you think Ratites ever flew?

Nain Eleffen Yep. You can see how it might have started by observing birds like cormorants but penguins are certainly next level.

Definitely a yes

Limey Lassen Splatoon?

I'm am utterly convinced that cephalopods are the most likely branch for intelligent life to form from outside the mammalian line should we ever leave the planet (intact, that is).

I had heard that It is estimate that they have the caliber to evolve like Humans. But the human evolution occured because they were forced to adapt and gain inteligence to survive. I doubt they would gain human inteligence simply because humans are gone. I still cant completely find a concrete answer to why humans gained inteligence, but most articles say it was due to competition and early humans trying to one up each other.

Come to think of it, being weak and squishy is one thing humans and cephalopods have in common. It makes sense we'd both go in for smarts. Evolution doesn't create things it doesn't need after all.

Squids and octopus are STILL very, very intellgent.

sounds interesting... I would like an in-depth LOOK into this

Eyes evolved independently several times. Bug eyes, squid eyes, worm eyes, fish eyes...

I see what you mean.

I'm sure we will get an eyeful.

Richard Dawkins did some deep videos on the subject but since the far left deplatformed him it might be hard to find his stuff

The place we never got to

Funny i don't remember a cyclops

Goofy goober yeah!

Ok Patrick you're starting to bum me out

david garcia ok

YES! Prehistoric mammals is one of my favourite something-other-than-dinosaurs-please ancient stuff subjects. They're just so weird and varied!

I didn't here any exanations of evolution, just fesriptio s of what they think happened with huge jumps between millions of years and a few words to patch the gaps. But its an interesting video though!

Ben Official This channel largely covers evolution; or at least certain evolutionary processes which species undergo to become what they are today. So I don’t see the point of your comment... Also, cephalopods losing their shell IS an evolutionary process. They can’t possibly patch the exact process that fills the gaps as, a) there are gaps in our knowledge which are gradually being filled (don’t forget that it took hundreds of millions of years of very gradual changes to get the species we recognize today) and b) this is not a biology lecture hall series; it’s a series compiled of short evolutionary explanations to get the knowledge ball rolling. It’s up to people to do their own further research if they’re so inclined. It WOULD be really cool if this channel looked into making longer, more in-depth videos on the evolution of all these species, however!

Ooh, that's a good one. I never would have considered that, but I like it.

Yeah, I'd love to hear what had already separated before that comet showed up and what diverged after. I'd love to hear a similar video discussing mammals back then. Were there therian mammals in the Cretaceous? Eutherian? If there were, how many different lineages survived to the present?

*asteroid also yes, mammals existed before the creataceous,