Because they have to explain why, you fucking idiot.

@@cia3058 wow there's no reason to be rude about it. whats wrong with you?

@@cia3058 Did you really just reply to an eight year old comment lol. Also take a chill pill you overreacted to the comment.

@@kell1reilly2 Respect that you responded to someone on an eight year old comment lol

@@captainasher287 lol yea right XD

Well it’s 2024 and it’s still perverse to impose sexual preferences onto YOUNG children. They should not even have sexual ideas in their innocent young minds. It’s sick. And I am a Christian and God says the act is an abomination to Him. I will not apologize or oppose God’s Word.

@@phylliswestbury5081 Didn’t god create gay people?

​@@phylliswestbury5081so if that story was about a prince marrying a princess, you still be against someone reading to second graders?

@GETH i was being sarcastic.

you had me in the first half ngl lol

true , the marriage must be banned and biological males to caress other biological males and have sex ....so yes ban the marriage because is disgusting and nazi

I see what you did there.

16years ago still disgusting?

We still think that way 😅

@@Dreammaster695 Not most people, thankfully.

2007 wasn't that long ago

They still think that way, they will flip flop for your vote.

Millions of Americans still do

same

Because Obama was taking about not promoting or fanning hatred and division among the American people and that is all they did for the last 4 years!!!!!! Hypocrites!!!!!

tygerof354 hmmm?

@@tygerof354 divisions have been caused by racists like you and the republican party

@@millevenon5853 lol wow! If you knew me you would think differently. People that assume and say things like you just did are what is the problem 😏

That’s some blatant homophobia

@@moonscape_3767 I’m literally gay 😂

@@joshdepaola4002 Why call yourself lame if that’s how you identify? This is a homophobic way of referring to yourself if you’re gay. It implies that gay is an insult. If that’s your choice, it seems confusing but that’s your own choice.

@@moonscape_3767 did I say that I think gay people are lame... people say “that’s gay” when somethings lame and there’s nothing I can do to change that I just thought the wording of the title of the video was funny “Democrats answer gay question”

@@joshdepaola4002 it is funny lol, that's what I thought too. The title called the question gay.

How so/come?

@@thegulagarchipelago5921 actually listen to him talk in some of the debates he was in.

@@satan3950 I'd say your opinion is worth Absolutely Noting if you have that social media name!!! Enough said.

@@thegulagarchipelago5921 what makes you think your opinion is worth any more than mine.

@@satan3950 The mere fact that you chose that name 😉 Some BS blooding gurgling demon that you think you are... You're actually just a whisper and a whimper.

Gay water 😳

Yeah, didn’t it turn the frogs gay 😳

Snowflake I'm glad they could get married but that MIGHT change cause they R GONNA revisit that issue sooner or later...I JUST HOPE it STAY the SAME as it is NOW...I AIN'T gonna even hold you...😑

It's like "gay" is used by them as a primary identity- like a different species or something. They put it at the front in a strange way instead of just simply loving who they love.

Actually degeneracy is vile

Marriage is a traditional religious institution defined as being between a man and a woman, which was understood by everyone -- including Obama and Biden, see other CNN videos -- less than a decade ago. Asking "Why is someone who is gay different? They are humans like every heterosexual person." is like asking "Why is someone who hasn't studied medicine different? They are humans like every doctor." to justify letting people practice medicine without a license. That's just not what the medical license *is,* just like marriage just *is not* between two men or two women, nor is it "just a piece of paper", nor is it "just showing you love each other". That's what flowers are for.

Exactly, there are no bigger perpetrators of fear, division and hate than THEM

Maybe cause it's not lol

@@fodraco4414 Of course it is lol. It's not up to you to decide that.

Maybe it's because back then nobody thought that it was.

That would have been political suicide in 2007, unfortunately.

​@fodraco4414 So you think government should tell people who to marry? Maybe you should move to North Korea

Nah it was based

Agreed ;)

Wow where did he go 🤣

​​@@karelglasner2673He cheated on his wife, had a kid with that mistress, denied being the father of the kid, later admitted to being father of the kid when the evidence was overwhelming, and then filed for divorce against his wife Elizabeth (she died while they were waiting for the 1-year waiting period for divorce that North Carolina mandates). Back then, scandals like that would finish you on either party. He might have survived those mistakes today, but times are different today than they were back then. He also was never an impressive candidate for President or for VP in 2004.

🖖

How are you doing today? can we meet?Its nice to see you here

It is kind of an odd terminology, isn’t it? I think it’s mostly because queer people have often been the ‘mysterious’ outsiders, like the ocean, rather than centrally annoying or hated. That’s why, going back even to the early days, there are plenty of stories and films about cishet people learning about queer people for the first time and just being like, “Nifty!”

Really? 😂

@@VedantMishra55 She was asked about New York's legislation of gay marriage and if the rest of the nation should follow a suit, and she answered no, in the state of New York.

The "slippery slope fallacy" is clearly not fallacy at all. These folks are nuts.

Right?? That’s their goal though, move the goal post further and further in the name of sexual liberation. It will only get worse.

@@NoOneLikesVegans Pretending a fallacy doesn't count for you and you alone isn't intellectually honest

@@Kimberedkey What? I'm pointing out that they claim the slippery slope is a fallacy when it clearly isn't. Take any major issue. Once upon a time they said about abortion that it should be "safe, legal, and RARE" and now they offer up to birth and say "shout your abortion!". Years ago they said gay people just want to be able to marry and we now see them not only want to shove it down children's throats, but you have people on the left arguing for throuples to get married. Years ago they said they only wanted to remove Confederate statues and now we see them taking down statues of everyone from Teddy Roosevelt to renaming schools named after Lincoln and Washington. Hell, they even renamed the mascots of George Washington University from the Colonials to the Revolutionaries. It's nothing more than an Americanized version of Maoism.

@@NoOneLikesVegans So does the possibility that it can go too far justify taking rights away from Americans?

I agree

2nd grade yeah NO and it's up to their parents and NOT the state who currently if I could I'd yank any of my tax dollars going to that FAILURE of an institution the public school system preparing our students for failure daily 🤣

@@karelglasner2673cry about it

As she went onto being divisive and hateful 🤣

Aiiwolf Yeah, too bad he did the exact opposite.

@@dirkdetzler9044 🤦‍♂️ no he didn’t. That’s just conservatives take on him

@@bms77 no he's right. There hasn't been this much division in the country post WW2 than when Obama was in office.

@@wtDrake Trump was more divisive than Obama. You're a hack if you argue with that.

@@anticorncob6 of course it was but it started getting bad under Obama's terms. It'll never be like the old days again

Damn this comment was 9 years ago

How are you doing today? can we meet?Its nice to see you here

How is there no moral accountability for people who don't believe in God? That's absolute nonsense. Those who don't believe in God don't commit sins that they know will hurt others. That's moral accountability. If anything, if the moral reason you don't commit sin is because of fear of some God's wrath and NOT the affect it has on others, YOU are the one with no moral accountability. You are only not committing said sins for fear of what might happen to you. You are selfish

You still believe that?

@@williamthomas1 ??????

@@PremierCCGuyMMXVI Yea Right, LOL, you know good and well

Tf is that suppose to mean. Both sides believe in different things but people shouldn't be affiliated with right or left in general

@@connergalles7106 democrats support human rights for lgbt people, Republicans don’t

seriously, it's like, "I don't think I can force my views on my own kids, I think a leftist pervert should force their views on them instead."

That’s not what he meant at all but ok

For the love of everything real, tangible and good you people seriously need to stop comparing being black with being gay. Why not compare having polio with being gay or being born a redhead with being gay? Inappropriate? Yes! So is comparing my blackness to someone’s gayness. Ty.

@@jacquelynn2051 You can't see any similarities? If you think being gay is a choice, then you aren't straight.

Pretty sure he was saying that discriminating against gay people is just as wrong and irrational as how black people were treated pre-civil rights.

So people who are different from you should have less rights then?

That was 14 years ago, people dress differently in 1980 versus 1990 too

I don't think the clothing has changed at all from 2008 to 2023.

wrong

​@@blu3_enjoyAmen! Praise Jesus!

That's right because our education system is at the bottom so until Basic education the reason we pay taxes for public education raises its standards, there will be no conversation about random things like that.

@@karelglasner2673 I agree! Let’s focus on fundamental educational issues!

Source?

@@Kimberedkey which statement would you like a source for?

teaching about homosexuality to kindergarteners@@ryanbianchi3118

The one from before I had access to basic human rights or...?

Me too

K

Jesus never said shit about homosexuality

​@@jak_the_buddhaJesus spoke for traditional male-female marriage (which gay/lesbian marriage clearly is not). Check out Matthew 19:5.

@@jrowlet where in that passage does it say "A man shall not marry another man"? From what I understand that's about switching loyalty from your parents to your wife.

@@jak_the_buddha Matthew 19:5: "For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh." Jesus orders a man in this passage to leave his parents and marry one wive in a heterosexual monogamous traditional marriage (not for a man to marry a man, not for a woman to marry a woman, and not for a man to marry multiple men or for a woman to marry multiple men in polygamy). If you want to reject the Bible as an atheist/agnostic and justify homosexuality, you would be wrong in rejecting God and His True Presence and His Word in the Bible, but at least you would not be using the Bible to justify it. God condemns LGBT behaviors in several passages in both the Old and New Testaments. To claim that the Bible allowed the behaviors when it has several passages that prohibit the behaviors is an absurd oxymoron (like claiming that liquid water is dry). Again, homosexuality only makes sense in secular humanistic relativism (where humans make their own morals in the absence of God and His Word in the Bible). To claim that homosexuality is right, you would have to argue that God is either wrong or not real, and you would have to claim that the Bible is not the error-free Word of God (because you would have to argue that the Bible at least had multiple errors in the multiple passages where God bans LGBT behaviors).

Yes

The 2008 conservative couldn’t get any worse

I think, while there’s great value to just letting people run their households: it’s a matter of fact that gay people exist and also a matter of fact that gay children exists, and whether or not parents talk to their children about gay people or not is the difference of letting those gay kids know that they’re not weird or wrong for it. While I was raised by heterosexual parents, it was never any secret or unknown thing that gay people existed, and when I started questioning my sexuality I had an easy reference. There are far too many horror stories of gay kids growing up in households where gay people are secrets and shames, where they couldn’t be themselves. That’s meaningful damage to deal a child and I know far too many people who’ve lost connection with their kids because that’s how their household was run. Shame and self-loathing are devastating, especially to children.

Would you say the same thing if it was an INTERRACIAL couple they were learning about?

@oliverpiper7210 and the current liberal couldn't be more stupid 🤣

Is this the first political debate you've ever watched lol The art of politics is the art of not answering directly and instead pivoting to something else.

Kryetar i klases x890😊

Source on that?

Just not the case is it? This is the issue with people like this. They're so solid that they just gargle and spew out random information they've seen on their flat-earth Facebook page

You're a prime example of what happens when someone has shitty parents

choklitchoklit curious about how you feel about Obama and trump today since all of this time has passed

OGlettuceWEED Yooooo! We’re old ass video buddies!

Your wish came true

It's difficult to read your message because of the broken English and horrid punctuation, if that isn't a sin I don't know what is. First, this is a conversation about gay marriage not trans rights but I know it's hard for Religious people to not jump to lecturing others about the bible in the comments. Secondly, the new testament, like most of the Bible, isn't clear at all and contradicts itself every few pages and even then most Christians argue that the bible should be interpreted in the scope of modern society rather than literally. Just like the Bible you also contradicted yourself. So if Jesus loves all of us so much that he died on the cross he can't forgive a little bum fun? Also if we're all made in the image of god does that mean God likes men or is bi? Must be...

@@Izapertron123 he does like men not sexually do It is a sin gay in general because a men will be a leader in to the women because men have a sensitive spot towards women nobody gay it’s a lie from the devil if god whant people to be gay men and men and women and women will be able to have babies but that is only though men and women the Bible is clear just ask Jesus for help to understand the Bible

@@Izapertron123 Jesus is always with you even in hard times

@@elijahevangarcia It’s a shame he wasn’t with you when you wrote that car crash of a message

@@Izapertron123 he is with everyone all the time