Im still on Sylverters approach, currently building a 3D continent as a strategic map with 4 factions to battle over it. I aren't a massive fan of tables, so adapted the alliances section. This helped me determine the largest power is the aggressor. The smallest, militarily is the only power with a coastline. My imagination suggested they are small but rich through trade, their armies are well equipped and will have a high proportion of elites and powerful friends across the water (with elephants!) Im going to use Age of Hannibal with significant house rules. Love a bit of world building!

Great video, went out and bought both solo wargaming guide and Henry Hyde's book based on your past videos. Glad to see you coming back around to this.

Everything done with the heart pencil is canonically the same world. You can't change my mind. Excited to see this play out !

I really appreciate these videos. Thanks for making them!

Great video. Definitely gotta get this book of Hyde's!

Charles S Grant, as in “The Ancient Wargame”? That is a fantastic wargaming book!!! If you find a copy, at a reasonable price, buy it!

Really great seeing how you use and adapt my ideas for your own campaign, mixing and matching with other influences-absolutely brilliant!

I've always liked the Tony Bath 'Setting up a Wargames campaign', but I think I've got to pick up this tome and see what I can plunder from it.

very Instructional example. Thanks. Never thought of defining opposition to ruling goverment

Yes! These map-based campaigns are what got me hooked on your channel in the first place. Any hope of a new Hinterlands campaign? 🤞🏼

Looks fun. Thanks for the resources.

Very nice! Once you get the genera down, I could make a nice version of the map and send it to you if that's helpful. I really enjoy cartography

Very interesting starting map/campaign generation.

Another good video and glad to see a return to some campaign play. I think you are spot on in saying that HH's book is a great resource of ideas, but might disappoint some looking for hard rules for campaigns. My own efforts at the moment tend to be a mix of Featherstone, the solo guide and a dash of Tony bath thrown in. One thing - each to his own of course - I tend to focus on the actual military side of the campaign and not so much the socio/political stuff and economy. Especially as a solo player , this avoids a rabbit hole of somply going into detail that can swamp my actual gaming side, generally I do just enough to get back story and reason for the campaign

Going to be interesting to see how holding Silver Lake affects the larger campaign.

For Naming Locations: use the names of the game book authors, and/or your favorite authors - unless you think of something you like better. You've already honored your audience, how about honoring your favorite authors?

The Hyde campaign? I thought Mr. Hyde stayed pretty much in London! Incontinentia? LOL Is that where elderly heads of state spend their last days? PS. Save the Magic Space Baby!!!

The political situation is interesting. Both sides have major stability concerns, and should major challenges be faced or either side backing the others opposition. Perhaps the North's Regent is Loyal to a Parliament, while the Heir wants to restore Royal Power to prior glory. As such, the Heir shelters in the South after a failed coup of the Regent with enough connections and popularity to give the South the just cause for war in exchange for a cut of the silver production and the northern coast of the lake. Maybe an ACW or Victorian Era Campaign would be a way to go!

Thats a much fairer way to generate the towns. Nice.

I think this map may be ripe for riverine warfare with ironclads or small shipping. Even if Abstracted, it could make for some interesting maneuvering!

Interesting vid. I've never been a fan of campaigns, staying with tournament balance point encounters or narrated conflicts with assymetric win conditions (inflicting x% damage, holding position for y turns, using low value points units etc. and being different for each combatant). I've found that unless there is a very good balancing mechanism, a single poor or a couple of sub optimal encounters, a campaign can enter a cascading failure mode. The campaign becomes irrelevant and not interesting for one of the parties. It then needs intervention and then doesn't differ from a narrated encounter above. YMMV. It looks and sounds as though you had great fun deriving this world and narrative to go along with it. The only part of the narrative that doesn't quite gel with me is the north south boder in the mountain/ river region. Putting the US/ Canada border aside, a lot of borders are set by natural barriers. Mainland Europe, tends to follow either rivers or high mountains and passes, with borders in the mountains defined by the watershed. The borders in the Low countries Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg etc seem to be based on old feudal claims and carving up the low feature terrain and forming/ following social and cultural links and identities. My building of narrative would look at how did it develop to the border it is today? What are the logistic, govermental, trading, conditions? What motivates the people to side with who they do? How is control/influence exerted? How would it be defended if attacked? Gibraltar, Cyprus, Basques in Spain, etc all add further complication and nuance onto the subject. However I am now interfering in your campaign!! The irony is not lost on me, passing judgement on your campaign but not wanting one of my own 🤣. I'm really interested in how this progresses and look forward to your updates. Thanks again for a thoughtful and engaging vid, stay safe and have fun.

Rad.

This book will be helpful only for RPGs or also when one is writing fiction novel?

Your maps are always fantastic. When I do my next big battle I have a whole bunch of different colored dice and with a little a manual. Justin blue for water, green for grasslands, yellow forestland, browns hills low mountains, black high mountains. 20-25 dice/color(?). I'll see how it goes...😮...😊...😳...🫣