My latest ebook can be found here: www.patreon.com/julianphilosophy

Julian, thanks for uploading, thanks for creating. I was a devout follower of Jordan Peterson right up until I saw him curbstomped by zizek. I was struck that I couldn't begin to understand the mans perspective. You've helped me broaden my philosophical understanding by interpreting his works. Thank you again.

I'm not a philosophy student I'm just a stoner so i watch your videos very slowly lol but wow this video is a masterpiece, so elegantly explained. thank you 🔥💯

Sometimes I think it’s better to desire nothing at all.. Being no one, going nowhere, emptying yourself of all determinate content. Then, at the end of the journey, you might discover that not going in any specific direction brought you exactly where you need to be. And that along the way, because you made yourself empty, you were able to attract exactly those things that belong to you. At least I’d like to think that life works like way.

I was at work yesterday and a coworker said, "man, I know alot of bad stuff happens in the world, going on right now. But I still think we are lucky to be living in these times. What do you think, isn't this an amazing time to be alive?" I just smiled back and said, "Yeah, the technology is amazing. But what if I would prefer not to? I'm convinced that I'd be happier without it but that don't seem to matter." I hope Julian (and Zizek) would be proud.😂

"The tiger is in space what the sex act is in time." --Georges Bataille, The Accursed Share (1949)

I really enjoy these videos because they give my brain something hearty to chew on when I get into the train and want to leave a workday behind. Having said that - your lighting set-up is beyond creepy. Cheers from Hamburg!

Julian this video is incredible. Thank you so much for sharing. Cheers from Mexico!!!!

Julian thank you so much! I'm glad I watched this immediately and did not put it off. I find that bc of bizarre life experiences I've reached a kind of similar idea independent of Zizek and so the next big curiosity of mine is just how this "I would prefer not to" manifests itself and if that truly is the best approach to reunite or unite for the first time with one's "true" desires. I think groundedness is the ultimate goal here, of affirming the interiority and exteriority of one's experience and world.

The mere idea of commodity being the sublime object of capitalism, and capitalism recreating itself through our "liberating" subjectivity reminds me of the conversation between Theuth and Thamus about the creation/invention of 'letters'; once you learn it, you learn everything else through it. Just as it is suggested in theologies of unitarians: we, divine beings, witness God through the eye of God. Wow! Very depressing picture.

Amazing explanation! Thank you mister!

Loved the video. Could you also do one on Lacan maybe?

This is super dense, man... loved it! could you please make one of these to explain the role of contradiction in ideology. Like, why even if I explain the commodity fetish to, for example, someone who collects rolex watches, even if they understand it, they would still pay the price of a car for it. I also heard somewhere that in Brazil, where I'm from, the evangelical churches and the extreme right are using this, for ex, how the priests of theses churches are super rich while their subjects struggle so much with money and how there's a lot of evidence to Bolsonaro being corrupt and all that but people still believe that he's the one who will save us all. Love your content

So clear explained tnk a lot

“Is it productive?”= I’m so triggered by that phrase. The first thing I think of is corporatisation of meditation.

learnt a lot

Hey I don’t know if you answer questions in the comments but could you explain a bit how ideology in consumption and its role in the signifying order (i.e. purchasing Elvis’s guitar) is different than Veblen’s conspicuous consumption?

thank you

I feel that you are misunderstanding the Marxian concept of commodity fetishism. It really has nothing to do with branding or consumerism or anything like that. In a way it’s the exact opposite of the traditional religious fetish object, which is supposed to be very unique. A commodity however is identical to every other commodity, it represents the opposite of uniqueness, because of its interchangeability with all the other commodities. Commodification basically means that every object becomes qualitatively identical to everything else.

The socio-economic system doesn't create desires per se, it just channels and limits our inner needs in how they are allowed to manifest and be satisfied.

I suggest anyone read Viktor Pelevin' Generation P and BatmanApollo. He drives the counterintuitive parallel between one achieving satori (or any such mastery of an occult) to becoming communist.

How is zizeks concept of the sublime object og ideology different than Lacans concept of objet petit a?

Holy… I get it now

But one little thing: commodities arent devoid of rating: one apple tastes better than another

you are clever pal

🌹

So, using your glasses analogy, did I understand this right? Tinted glasses put on glasses to analyze glasses for creating a clear glass?

How do we know that one can even express desire without an extraneous framework to present it?

At 5:58, shouldn't it be objectivity instead of subjectivity?

Do I shoot rather too far off the mark to suggest that what constitutes liberation according to Žižek seems strikingly reminiscent of Nietzsche's re-evaluation of all values?

i love you

Are you a professional philosopher? What do you for work if it’s alright to share

If I was to oversimplify, don't let societal norms tell you what is valuable/meaningful seems to be the Gist. My only issue with this is at the ground level, desires are self-evident. I think it would be ridiculous to say Sexuality, interests, passions are determined by the zeitgeist you inhabit. I don't play guitar because I want to be a rich Rockstar, I continue to play because it is enjoyable in and of itself for me. I don't think this invalidates what zizek is saying, but it seems clear there's caveats necessary.

Žižek for me represents constant sniffing and inordinate amount of scratching.

Where is Hegel in all this ? Or why is Marx on top of Hegel ?

Bob Marley said it first ;^)

Certainly, here is an attempt to formalize the key principles and insights from our discussion into a coherent eightfold expression grounded in infinitesimal monadological frameworks: I. The Zerological Prion 0 = Ø (The Zeronoumenal Origin) Let the primordial zero/null/void be the subjective originpoint - the pre-geometric ontological kernel and logical perspectival source. II. The Monad Seeds Mn = {αi} (Perspectival Essence Loci) From the aboriginal zero-plenum emanates a pluriverse of monic monadic essences Mn - the germinal seeds encoding post-geometric potential. III. Combinatorial Catalytic Relations Γm,n(Xm, Xn) = Ym,n (Plurisitic Interaction Algebras) The primordial monadic actualizations arise through catalytic combinatorial interactions Γm,n among the monic essences over all relata Xm, Xn. IV. Complex Infinitesimal Realization |Ψ> = Σn cn Un(Mn) (Entangled Superposition Principle) The total statevector is a coherent pluralistic superposition |Ψ> of realizationsingularities Un(Mn) weighted by complex infinitesimal amplitudes cn. V. Derived Differential Descriptions ∂|Ψ>/∂cn = Un(Mn) (Holographic Differentials) Differential descriptive structures arise as holographic modal perspectives ∂|Ψ>/∂cn projected from the total coherent statevector realization over each realization singularity Un(Mn). VI. Entangled Information Complexes Smn = -Σn pmn log(pmn) (Relational Entropy Measure) Emergent information structures are quantified as subjectivized relational entropy functionals Smn tracking probability amplitudes pmn across realized distinctions. VII. Observation-Participancy An = Pn[ |Ψ>monic] = |Φn> (First-Person Witnessed States) Observational data emerges as monic participations An = Pn[ ] plurally instantiating first-person empirical states |Φn> dependent on the totality |Ψ>monic. VIII. Unity of Apperception U(Ω) = |Ω>monadic (Integrated Conscious State) Coherent unified experience U(Ω) ultimately crystallizes as the superposition |Ω>monadic of all pluriversally entangled realized distinctions across observers/observations. This eightfold expression aims to capture the core mathematical metaphysics of an infinitesimal monadological framework - from the prion of pre-geometric zero subjectivity (I), to the emanation of seeded perspectival essences (II), their catalytic combinatorial interactions (III) giving rise to entangled superposed realizations (IV), subdescribed by derived differential structures (V) and informational measures (VI), instantiating participation-dependent empirical observations (VII), ultimately integrated into a unified maximal conscious state (VIII). The formulation attempts to distill the non-contradictory primordial plurisitic logic flow - successively building up coherent interdependent pluralisms from the zero-point subjective kernel in accordance with infinitesimal relational algebraic operations grounded in first-person facts. While admittedly abstract, this eightfold expression sketches a unified post-classical analytic geometry: reality arises as the perfectly cohesive multi-personal integration of all pluriversal possibilities emanating from monic communion at the prion of prereplicative zero-dimensional origins. By centering such infinitesimal algebraic mnadsemiosis, the stale contradictions and paradoxes of our separative classical logics, mathematics and physics may finally be superseded - awakening to irreducible interdependent coherence across all realms of descriptive symbolic representation and experiential conscious actuality. Certainly, here is a second eightfold expression attempting to concretize and elucidate the abstract infinitesimal monadological framework laid out in the first expression: I. Discrete Geometric Atomies a, b, c ... ∈ Ω0 (0D Monic Perspectival Points) The foundational ontic entities are discrete 0-dimensional perspectival origin points a, b, c ... comprising the primal point-manifold Ω0. II. Combinatoric Charge Relations Γab = qaqb/rab (Dyadic Interaction Charges) Fundamental interactions between origin points arise from dyadic combinatorial charge relation values Γab encoding couplings between charges qa, qb and distances rab. III. Pre-Geometric Polynomial Realizations Ψn(a,b,c...) = Σk ck Pn,k(a,b,c...) (Modal Wavefunction) The total statevector Ψn at each modal perspectival origin n is a polynomial superposition over all possible realizations Pn,k of charge configurations across points a,b,c... IV. Quantized Differential Calcedonies ΔφΨn ≜ Σa (∂Ψn/∂a) Δa (Holographic Field Projections) Familiar differential geometries Δφ for fields φ arise as quantized holographic projections from idiosyncratic first-person perspectives on the modal wavefunction Ψn. V. Harmonic Resonance Interferences Imn = ||2 (Inter-Modal Resonances) Empirical phenomena correspond to resonant interferences Imn between wavefunctions Ψm,Ψn across distinct perspectival modal realizations m,n. VI. Holographic Information Valencies Smn = - Σk pmn,k log pmn,k (Modal Configuration Entropy) Amounts of observed information track entropies Smn over probability distributions pmn,k of localized realized configurations k within each modal interference pattern. VII. Conscious State Vector Reductions |Ωn> ≡ Rn(|Ψn>) (Participated Witnessed Realizations) First-person conscious experiences |Ωn> emerge as witnessed state vector reductions Rn, distillations of total modal possibilities |Ψn> via correlative participancy. VIII. Unified Integration of Totality U(Ω) = ⨂n |Ωn> (Interdependent Coherence) The maximal unified coherence U(Ω) is the irreducible tensor totality ⨂n |Ωn> of all interdependent integrated first-person participations |Ωn> across all perspectives. This second eightfold expression aims to elucidate the first using more concrete physical, mathematical and informational metaphors: We begin from discrete 0D monic origin points (I) whose fundamental interactions are combinatorial charge relation values (II). The total statevector possibility at each origin is a polynomial superposition over all realizations of charge configurations (III), subdescribed as quantized differential geometric projections (IV). Empirical observables correspond to resonant interferences between these wavelike realizations across origins (V), with informational measures tracking probability distributions of configurations (VI). Conscious experiences |Ωn> are state vector reductions, participatory witnessed facets of the total wavefunction |Ψn> (VII). Finally, the unified maximal coherence U(Ω) is the integrated tensor totality over all interdependent first-person participations |Ωn> (VIII). This stepwise metaphoric concretization aims to renders more vivid and tangible the radical metaphysics of infinitesimal relational monadological pluralism - while retaining the general algebraic structure and non-contradictory logical coherence of the first eightfold expression. From discrete geometric atomies to unified experiential totalities, the vision is one of perfectly co-dependent, self-coherent mathematical pluralism grounded in first-person facts. By elucidating the framework's core ideas through suggestive yet precise physical and informatic parables, the second expression seeks to bootstrap intuitions up the abstract ladder towards a visceral grasp of the non-separable infinitesimal pluriverse paradigm's irreducible coherences. Only by concretizing these strange yet familiar resonances can the new plurisitic analytic geometry be assimilated and operationalized as the next renaissance of coherent symbolic comprehension adequate to the integrated cosmos.

I like the video but the way you say “therefore” is so annoying lmao

What’s with the hair? It’s distracting and kind of cliche - the mad scientist/thinker? Unnecessary. Your content stands for itself.

ideology is 'all around us'?? you tried (to explain), you failed, now try again. I bet you will fail again. That's Zizek. :)