Nice! Next time rotate him so you can say "GET ROTATED!"😆

VIOLENCE!!

Kinsey you are a great human being

BAHH HUMBUG!!

The name actually has nothing to do with the pricing in store, they’re called 5 Below with a degree symbol which means they’re “cooler” than every other low price store

Five Above

Increments of 5

The name actually has nothing to do with the pricing in store, they’re called 5 Below with a degree symbol which means they’re “cooler” than every other low price store

Or five below and beyond

High Five

You’d be better off going to Harbor Freight. They give them away for free, regularly.

Yeah, it pretty accurately describes my first trip south. :D

Been there.. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤣🤣

@@PlatinumEagleStudios Umm not sure why you are mentioning that when the headphones in question are on the cheaper end of over the ear headphones without being kids cracker jack quality headphones. I paid like $58+tax and have gotten nearly a good two years out of them with no degradation apart from the cushions getting a bit flat (which is to be expected when you work on the computer and have headphones on 60hrs a week for work plus another like 20-30 hours a week for relax time). Like I said they are not great headphones overall, they are great for the price point. Battery has held up good to where I can still plug them in once every 3 days despite using them a good 12 hours a day, brand has not loosened or weakened at all, sound is the same quality as $110 headphones of the same style, and only wear has been the pads which with over 10,000 hours of use is kind of to be expected. I spend as little money on headphones as possible that are still comfortable, most of the $30-50 range ones are terribly uncomfortable or sound super tinny and using them 12+ hours a day they need to be comfortable, which is why I tend to go with the $60-90 range. Where they are more comfortable, sound decent enough but don't break the bank. You can talk shit all you want about how people pay to put a sticker on something, but you know what, it isn't 1990 any more, it is extremely hard to find a DECENT pair of over the ears headphones for anything under $80, it's called inflation. These fall somewhere between the range of "decent" and "good" where they are better than decent but not good enough to be called good either. Show me a pair of wireless headphones that lasts over 2 years where the battery still holds a good charge after that two years, sounds decent, and costs under $75 but doesn't sacrifice comfort by making the over the ear parts to small to go over the ears thus applying pressure on the ears.

@@PlatinumEagleStudios No seriously, name me a single pair of wireless over the ear headphones where the battery keeps good charge after two years and 10,000 hours of usage that costs under $75 that is actually comfortable. I would love to have a back up pair of headphones for when my daughter inevitably steps on them, go on, what wireless headphones that are over the ear with noise canceling that are comfortable to wear for 10-15 hours a day can you list me that costs less than $75? (Like I said I bought mine for under $60 but I know I bought them on a discount). I am all ears.

@@PlatinumEagleStudios LMAO, those headphones are $380+tax, far far outside the under $75 range, WTF you smoking mate? "Oh don't waist $60 on some sticker, instead waist $400 more than 6x as much for a brand name that charges extra just for being a brand name much like how Sony over charges for the label of Sony" You want to try again to tell me over the ear headphones that sound good, have good battery, noise canceling, and last over 2 years for under, heck I'll give you a wider range and say under $90 instead of $75. Bose are always way over priced due to their brand recognition, choosing Bose is like paying $11 for 100 500mg Tylenol (or $22 for two bottles for 200) over paying $3.50 for 200 500mg acetaminophen. You are paying 6x the price for brand recognition for two of the exact same product. Sure Tylenol (brand) did all the R&D and created the original product and it was exclusive for 7-8 years due to how laws are for medicine but everyone else can now make the exact same medicine that has to pass FDA things to show it is equivalent as well yet can sell it at a fraction of the cost because they didn't have to spend all the money on R&D. So again, list me one other pair of over the ear wireless headphones with battery life that still lasts at least 30 hours after 2 years, that has noise canceling, that sounds decent (not great but simply decent), that is comfortable to wear for extended periods of time (10-15 hours), that costs under $90 (since clearly under $75 was too hard for you). Not some $380 pair of headphones that realistically you could find the exact same quality for $180 if it doesn't have the Bose sticker on it, but ones that would be under triple digits even after tax.

@@PlatinumEagleStudios I also find it amusing that not only are you saying I should spend 6x as much for Bose when you are saying I am spending too much, but you are also bragging about 25 hour battery life when brand new when I already stated my 2 year old headphones are still being used for 30-40 hours between each charge after 2 years of abuse, 25 hours is terribly low that would only be lasting like 8-10 after 2 years because batteries degrade, so not sure why you are proud of 25 hours brand new battery life (don't get me wrong it isn't bad battery life, but it isn't something to brag about either).

What did Anker wrong?

@@QWERTYQwertz852 Look up paul moore eufy on youtube. That's the source video, then LTT covers it in a couple wan shows. Along with announcing them dropping anker as a sponsor. Pretty much, anker is uploading your footage/pictures whatever to their own unsecured cloud server.

@@Tagiau Woah. Thats Not a very good move From Anker… I expected better From Anker