Steven Crowder is the coolest Canadian alive. You need to come bring this dialogue to the NYC zombies that surround me.

dude my mind never needed changing.

No

I just love you were drinking a Monster Ultra the whole time :)

Nice! Will you ever do a live debate with Vox? Id love to see him be roasted live

Swiper no swiping! Swiper no swiping!

@@OnionYeeter based ancap?

if someone tries to shoot you say no to the bullet, it can't penetrate you without consent.

Thanks for the info it worked for me. He tried to stab me instead tho

Finlay Harrison oh no! I wish you would’ve told me sooner! Apparently this trick works with stabbing a too!!!

Suscribed!! HAHAAA

@@landychapman3 lies. He has no subscrivers

Brroooo what app is it

@@rcm1815 he has 2

@FrostBloodGames To be fair, that isn't relevant

YES SIRRR, EXACTLY!!

You are my roll model

Even north korea? You are brave

@@user-mj7lw6iw3r even if I were a man, I still wouldn't step foot in that place

As a man, I'd rather not walk down a city street at night and that's why I'd probably be carrying.

"I have an app and I know how to use it!"

When seconds count, the police are only minutes away

the atacker is also allowed to carry a gun.. maybe he wouldn't if guns were not given to everyone

@@paula19335 you think a law is going to stop a criminal with the intent of using said gun to commit another crime.... From committing a crime to illegally acquire said gun???

Kevin Kegerise and she has some points, I mean, in country’s with armed police, police casualties areincreased because some criminals take the gun off the officer and shot them

Yeah probably shouldn’t be in college then.

@@cripple8339 Lmao which is why officers are trained.

Bryan Itza-Chu Lopez that doesn’t t stop it from happening LmAo

I think all these arguments boil down to the fact that if we are going to allow everyone to own tools designed to murder other human beings then we should probably make sure that everyone who has guns 1. Knows how to properly and safely use and store one 2. Respects the power of having this murdering tool and is willing to take responsibility for the consequences of using it. The reason we have so much gun violence is because guns are so readily available (as the should be) but many, if not most people are missing one or both of those points.

I got something for you to yank.

Epoch plus5 Bro you are more likely to die from a fucking knife. Jesus, 39% of homicides in 2017 were from “sharp objects”. How the fuck does that happen? And it’s fucking increasing, brits the fuck is going on

@@itstesfa4185 and the country which has more gun related homicides is Brazil, where guns are prohibited for the major part. And another funny thing, they made a plebiscite about gun control, the population said NO to control at around 60%, and the Workers Party still did it.

She didn’t seem too leftist to me Idk

💯💯💯💯💯💯

I screamed🤣

Time stamp

@@R9000S I know its a week late but 5:09

@The Clownening an app that calls the police, that won't come immediately. Guns are immediate protection for immediately dangerous situation(s), which is why it's good to have one.

Lmfao I loved that part!

That is in no way a good argument either. If someone comes up behind you in the dark and grabs you, you're fucked either way. At least having a gun in the situation would give you somewhat of a chance. If the man had the intent to kill already, the gun won't change that. All the gun does is even the playing field, especially between man and woman.

Mark George learn basic defense so you can get out of whatever hold you're in, then you draw your gun so he can't attack again. Gun grabbers literally don't live in reality. It's fuckin insane.

the gun doesnt protect you or stop crime. thats been proven over and over. how is a gun going to help you when youre not facing the guy and you havent even drawn it yet? the gun is not an equalizer pal. its an offensive weapon where you already have a plan in mind. american sniper and his friend were both armed when they were shot and killed.

life grabbers are delusional thinking they are john wayne or clint eastwood. that crap only happens in the movies. guy has you by the neck at night behind you and youre going to be superman? wrong.

youre 22 times more likely to be shot by a gun in the home than to have it used for self defense.

Good for you. You left the dumb side

Weapons are not proper instruments. There more “guns” you owe the less secure you become.

@@arnekronvall817 what makes you believe that?

@@arnekronvall817 lmao 😅😅😅 well better tell that to the 101First Airborne that 1 platoon gets a limit of 1 gun

@@arnekronvall817 Guess we should stop issuing weapons to police and military then, if it makes you so threatened.

Take my money!!!

You predicted Call Of duty modern war fare lol

Jajaja mannn I almost cry reading this jaja I just imagined it Im high af😭

Relatable

As soon as she said that I said well your right looks we need tanks and fighter jets

lol yeah 👍🏻

Right like why would they be saying that unless they want more power? It's so obvious

As someone who lived under communist dictatorship, i completely agree!

@Just here For fun wrap your head around this the criminals are going to get ahold of illegal firearms no matter what. So if we make firearms illegal then all your hurting is the law abiding citizens. In my school we had teachers that would carry inside the school for that reason that if something happen such as a shooting they would step up and put their life’s on the line to save the students and the other teachers. If your wondering I went to school in Texas.

@Just here For fun sorry for what feeling protected. Know that if it came down to it that teacher would do everything thing they could to safe me and others. No the second amendment is about the ability to protect yourself and others from danger. That could be from a criminal or a home invader or a tyrannical government. It was a concealed firearm never seen it out. As responsible firearm owners only pull your gun out when your life or another is in danger. It’s sad that they don’t teach kids their rights and why we have them. Your teachers failed you.

intelligent? I wouldn't go that far. I would say maybe well spoken but that doesn't always mean intelligence. She said the governments job is to have you trust them to protect you.

@@navyvet7138 And also she contadicted herself a couple times

No she's not 😂

Intelligent is a stretch. Her cadence and vocabulary was horrible

I agree even though they disagreed she handled it well

Think*

I need my medicinal M1A2 Abrams

@@momoko_20 I messed up

Me, a cool dude: Yeah a sword would be a lot cooler

@@HK_Sage and potentially more intimating. If I saw someone run at me with a longsword, I would be scared shitless. Especially if they had the applicable 15th century armor.

Get something to make you feel safe or stop walking around at night

It’s come to that now

Yeah because the app is so much safer than a gun. Lmao

Looking to protect yourself or deal some damage ?

@@DefinitelyMaeB -_-

LITERALLY

These people aren't anti gun. They're anti guns in the hands of civilians. Same with politicians, they're sure pro gun when surrounded by guardsmen and secret service at the capitol.

*What's hard to understand? If a Black guy was giving her problems, her tap of a button on her app would have the Police come and brutalize her threat. Therefore, she's protected as claimed...*

@@AzNightmare I mean the app is a good idea but it wouldn't stop something like a mugging

you can also get training for yourself

Salvage Gaming Holy shit I can’t say it better.

Lmao, it's so funny seeing gun owners have this perception that someone is going to break into their home to try and murder them. How many enemies do you have?! I'm sure the majority of gun owners will never need to use their firearm in a self-defense scenario. But! Now that you can easily get a gun, so can the mentally unstable guy. So can the thug who sells drugs. So can the rapist. So can the thief who just wants to steal your TV but now has a gun so the breaking and entering is elevator to a life or death situation for both you and him. So can the hothead who gets into a road rage arguments. Guns shouldn't be outright banned, but the US has far too many guns. My ideal: You need to go through an 8 month waiting period when applying for a gun license. Extremely strict background check, you need people to vouch for your mental stability, and above 21. Mag limit of 10 rounds for handguns, 5 for rifles. No open carry. No, conceal carry.

Gun control: the theory that a woman found dead in an alleyway, raped and strangled with her own pantyhose is somehow morally superior to the woman who is explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal gunshot wound.

Schmuck I know multiple people who were protected by themselves or someone else displaying or using a firearm. The most recent was a friend who returned home at about 11:30 at night. As he opened the door to his family’s home four young men accosted him and tried to force their way in, but his father hearing the commotion immediately grabbed his firearm and by brandishing it they ran scared. Of course the police were called and a report was made though the suspects were not found. The hope when you buy a firearm is that you will never need to use it for self-defense. However, it is available and you are trained to use it competently when you must. Also, you have clearly never attempted to purchased a firearm. There are already many different checks that are used during the process. That’s why the guns that criminals use are almost always illegally obtained. Additionally the “checks” you want to put in place are so arbitrary and can easily be used against anyone ever receiving licensure. Why 8 months? Why not 6? 4? 12? What makes 8 the magic number? What if you had an ex-girlfriend with a nasty break-up? All she has to do is say you’re mentally unstable. Finally, no carry of any kind so I will never be able to use it defensively outside my home ever?

So she says cars are necessary in rural areas to get around. Living in a rural area is more of a reason to have a gun if it takes police 30 min or more to get to you.

Lol

Tasers & pepper spray work pretty well

Derpy Troll not if the suspect is on pcp, takes maybe 8 rounds minimum, depending on the round, to stop the perp entirely. Tasers would be ineffective, and pepper spray wouldn’t faze him. Non lethal means of takedown is a noble practice, but many times in vain.

Flamethrowers are a good weapon if you want to burn your own house lol

LMAO 😂😂

ikr

😂😂

But "As a woman, i feel very threatened" i have no idea what this thing is.

@@skylinedrevn Is it a woman tho? It said trans...

@@gaijillahimself908 She literally said "As a woman, i feel very threatened" Thats why im beyond confused. They dont even know what they are and yet try to tell everybody else what they can and cant do.

Typical liberal. "Russian collusion allowed Trump to win 2016". *Biden looks to be winning 2020*: "the presidential election cannot be frauded in any way, it is perfectly secure, there is nothing to see here, move along".

At least they consistently hate guns for no reason

How the fuck is Texas a blue state, this is really pissing me off know the democrats hate guns.

If a tyrannical government comes the cops will be enforcing it and that boot licking sure ain’t gonna help

*slurp out of Monster can* Liberal

In Nordic countries they show up mostly with tasers and/or dogs. They bring out firearms only if the criminal is armed and dangerous.

@@newera478 There is ya proof that gun free zones aren't safer. You just cant cure stupid.

@@throughput6674 are you dumb

@@throughput6674 Except noways only had one mass shooting, Americas had about 200 and all of which were stopped by police or by the gun mans committing suicide.... No armed citizen has ever stopped a massacre. So yes gun free zones are safer, statistic say other wise. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mass_shootings_in_the_United_States None of these mass shooting have been committed by the government and the only mass shooting committed by police was one in the 1920s. Infact why you dont show stats of how many crimes have been stopped by gun owners, instead of hypotheticals?

DoubleO no mass shooting has ever been stopped by an armed citizen? Are you sure about that? That’s rhetorical bc you’re wrong

Well, no

@@arnekronvall817 That’s the point. It’s literally the same exact logic as gun control.

​@@matthewjones39 No, it's about you proving that you're responsible and sane enough to own a gun. And I would say maybe a couple of guns and not a bunker with 20 rifles. You don't ban sober drivers, you ban those who can't stay sober to drive.

@@Jaycof14 I’m not sure what’s wrong with owning 20 rifles, and we already have background checks.

But she has an APP!

Nah it makes a lot more sense to get your phone, get to the app, tell the perp to wait until the cops show up. Or something. I have a CCL myself but this app idea, wow. XD

She then a few minutes later goes “I’m transgender and feel threatened” 😂

Jackpot

Curb your gun rights.

An unstoppable force has met an immovable object.

Man*

EXACTLY because not even the people trained to use a gun can use them responsibly. A why again should everyone have one?

@@camposjesus3725 was that a man? they said they were a girl, but also trans, so are they pretending to be a girl? or are they just dumb?

@@NomTom because there are criminals running around with guns, these guys have a lot of power and can easily kill anyone they want, the police wouldnt be able to get there on time, it would just result in a death and an arrest. but if you have people carrying, then as soon as they try to do anything, multiple guns are drawn on them, and these people dont wanna kill anybody, so they will not just shoot willy nilly, the person committing a crime now has to put down the gun or die themselves. then when the police get there, there is an arrest and no deaths.

Yeah that line of reasoning has never made sense to me.

Yeah your countries fucked sorry, I feel bad for you. Guns should 100% not be in the hands of civilians but with how many are in circulation and your terrible crime rate. Truly hopless

@@alasdairriley2967 wow you probably live in the shitty uk , were only the criminals have guns 🤣

@@alasdairriley2967 a criminals going to have gun regardless if it’s legal or not , so normal law abiding citizens should be allowed to have a gun to defend themselves

@@deadstar8663 hence why I said your country is fucked :)

I feel like all she needs is a little push and she'll be amongst we armed Americans. I think people like her are only pro-gun control because their peer groups are dominate by such thinkers.

HEY, if you an ugly woman , you don’t need to worry about being accosted when you walk around at night.

TiconderogaX bruh how is she even trans, she identifies as a woman and is one so

+Donald Dick She says she is trans at 7:40

The gays and lesbians should be all the more pro-gun, when radical islam hits the streets, target number one are the gays... correction, Jews followed by the gays.

fancy seeing you here. also, nail, meet hammer. how's the headache?

That’s me boi

You watch Crowder nice

they crazy that girl is mind controled by school she dumb as fuck

I wish i was on campus that day lol. These arguments were terrible.

That's a MAN BABAAY! ::In his best Austin Powers voice::

So she's a woman, or a transexual?

you should probably move to a better neighborhood

I'd be terrified for that person to have a concealed gun. i doubt he/she would actually practice shooting and in the event he/she needs to use it, would hit everything and everyone BUT his/her intended target. i mean he/she did say "what if i shot the intruder and didnt know if he was a threat...." Umm you identify before shooting you fuck... lol Its good some of these people are against buying guns, it allows the smart ones to maintain control and power. (i love guns and own many)

Jaime Navarro she's a woman she just wants to be trans because it's the "in" thing to be right now

to be fair that the "brown guy" its kinda true, no matter of statistic can disprove that

In some cases that can be relevant, for example «As a black guy i feel threatened when the police stop me»

exactly right my man, which causes changes in behaviour so on

Sara M. FUCK YA CHICKEN STRIPS

It should be "as a me choosing to be a victim of myself"

Lapis Loaf gun rights are basic human rights.

In this country yes, in many other countries no.

phillman5 gun rights doesn't limited to USA.

I didn't say it was! You said gun rights are a basic human rights, I said not in all countries, I didn't say only in USA.

phillman5 when you said "this country", I can see that you are mentioning USA.

see, you're coming at this from the angle that the best defense is a good offense but what if instead of a gun you had a moat full of alligators around your reinforced stone keep with a frenchman at the top to yell insults at people. Much more effective defense no?

@@micspam388 HELL YES Next thing you know liberals are gonna ban alligators

However i normally agree with Steven on alot of topics i think here there is an important point not being discussed properly. Yes, a gun can be very effective. But bear in mind that most people owning a gun aren't necessarily that capable of handling one. What a gun will do in uncapable hands though is escalate a situation. For example you are robbed at gunpoint, or even with a knife for that matter. You pull your gun which will make both you and the robber nervous, therefore making it more likely to get fatally injured. The robber might never had an intent to harm you but because of the threatening situation will be 'forced' to apply violence. So one should ask themselves, is a gun really the most effective way to DEFEND yourself?

@@bboyjustice3453 Guns are still the most effective form of defence. Weather or not they are in trained hands. A car can kill if the driver dosent know what they are doing; does this mean we should ban cars?

@@NickTheWize no, but it means that we should have training and license programs to promote responsible gun ownership. Right?

?

Totally brainwashed.

God needs to help it mentally not just physically.

And she also talks about police brutality, but believes cops would save her with an app

Natural selection my friends

Your story explains exactly how the West was won. It was not the US army that won the West, but private individuals who owned six shooters who won the West. This was because the army was in a centralized position, and when a call came for help against robbers or Indians, by the time the cavalry got there, the enemy was gone. However, when individuals had firearms, they could defend themselves against attackers or retaliate before the cavalry got there. If you want a couple of good stories where this is shown, then I would recommend G. A. Henty's books "Out on the Pampas," and " Redskin and Cowboy, a tale of the western plains"

There is a saying that I've heard said my whole life and it's stuck with me.. "When you only have seconds to live, the police are just minutes away." I also had "Treat guns like they're always loaded, even if you think they aren't" and "Don't point that at anything you don't plan to destroy" basically drilled into me whenever the very topic of firearms were brought up.

Exactly,if they even come. Even then there only human and may not protect your life over there's.

Exactly.

I’m deployed and a man broke into my wife’s and I Home. Wife locked door and had the kids with her. Her pistol was pointed right at the door with the cops on the phone. Took the cops 45 min to make entry. Wife was responsible for herself and our children’s lives, and she was ready to defend it.

And its a man as well lmaooo. So theres no excuse.

I have an app on my phone that assures my safety. Lol

@@ahxpluhh lol classic

If now one has a gun you don't have to protect yourself from it!!

@@mlue4991 ah yes the classic if guns are illegal than criminals won't have them. Do you know why we call them criminals, well I'll explain because they don't follow the law.

LMFAO. I know. I always have to laugh my ass off at that argument. These people say it's wrong for me as a private citizen to carry a firearm to protect myself or my family for X, Y, Z reasons. And they're perfectly content in putting their lives and their families lives in the hands of police officers. Who would show up to defend you, WITH A GUN. And as mentioned, cops the majority of the time show up AFTER a crime has been commited. Cops RARELY proactively prevent crime from occurring. Most often they are there after the fact to clean up the mess and find the person responsible for the crime. The benefit of a private citizen carrying a firearm and protecting themselves with it is that usually it PREVENTS the crime from occurring to begin with. And I think that's our right as people to be able to defend our own lives and not just sit around and wait and hope that someone ELSE with a gun will show up in time to save me or my son.

Yeah that’s why my Springfield is by my pillow and AR is next to my leg..! Easy access

Exactly 😂😂😂😂😂😂

That's leftist logic for you.

@@skipdippity ahhh i cant wait for my springfield xd9 to clear backround. I have my mav88 loaded with 00buck in my safe and my AR with 2 30 round mags. Shotgun for me, Ar for my wife if they make it past me.

This is why aliens won’t visit us 🤦🏽‍♂️

Rey Alecio >also thinks that the cops who are supposed to protect her are corrupted and need FURTHER training.

I’m hispanic so growing up as one, I was raised to be a democrat and only vote democrat. Now I have a brain of my own and see there’s no logic behind it.

what did they tell you about democrats to only vote for them that you believed and now you don'tjuts curious

Rey Alecio welcome to the world of thinking for yourself!

🤣🤣🤣

And that makes me a victim of police brutally. Its like im black without benefits. 😆 idk

You forgot the disabled part, lol

Imagine they were also vegan?

*mentally challenged person

That's what mental gymnastics sound like she is constantly hitting the backspace key to correct all the inconsistencies as they show up.

lol

😂😂😂

Wii news channel is the ONLY reliable news source

Exactly I bought a shotgun and told the guys at work and one of them asked if I got it legally and I asked him do you know anybody you can get a firearm from underground he said no I said neither do I where did you come up with that he said the news said it, I told him that’s your problem you trust the news to much. The news makes it out to be that everybody that has a firearm is already suspect, I wouldn’t know the first place to look for an illegal firearm btw I’m a veteran I work at a government facility that you can barely even have a speeding ticket to work at what a stupid question to ask somebody if they bought a firearm illegally, why would I need or want to. All the snowflakes listening to the Beatles and believe in the tree hugging news to much.

@Robert Waters fox News is no better than CNN, because both news stations are very biased towards their side and don't tell tell the whole story so don't get so defensive bud

I can forgive lack of knowledge, I cant forgive ignoring knowledge presented to you because you disagree.

For a guy who gets his information from CNN and The Young Turks, he was able to have a decent discussion. Sure explains why he felt he was a targeted individual for having brown skin. Just look up "The Young Turks while black" on KZfaq. You get loads of videos.

I agree, he seemed very intelligent, polite and open-minded. These are the kinds of discussions crowder hopes for. it's only the ones who are snarky first that hes snarky back to.

I could not agree more. And if more people would be more willing to listen to others if they were like this girl

Charlie Peterson "girl"

True. She has the speaking skills of a dog

The fact that she doesn't yell get in Steven's face is wonderful.

Charlie Peterson hell yea

I think that we should get swordfighting back. Give a lady a rapier, and training. Let's see who wants to mess with her!

This is classic. Crowder is very quick witted. One of his most admirable qualities.

Quinton Wiebe love this

*is getting mugged* Man with knife: I'm gonna stab you Me, unsheathing my greatsword: Not before I decapitate you lol

Lol I know right? It's like this girl doesn't realize the purpose of firearms in the first place.

Exactly.

Ironic, no?

The irony is strong with this one

You mean trained police officers, that are too within the confines of law, at least in most countries.

Yes, men with guns.

But she did do *something* ... she made a flagrant display of ignorance... that's somthing, nothing to be proud of unless she learns from it, but hey it's something lol.

kek

:D :D :D :D :D

Lol be nice. Haha

Adam Harper Its like saying I'm a trans trans.

Oh what a pussy you are lol

@@worldisfilledb Stay safe, don’t off yourself. You’re clearly depressed.

Is that counting the first person in this video? That may be a man 😂

🎆

Good conversation but coming from a guy that owns dozens of firearms of all kinds, this dude knows nothing of firearms

Feyd Darkholme the constitution was actually written to strengthen the government. Articles of confederation made it too weak and the only way states would vote on the strong constitution is because the bill of rights guaranteed rights to citizens and states.

Spammo270 well, I can see your point when you try to argue that. But honestly, looking back on it appears that the Bill of Rights was a mistake. The idea of the Constitution was to lay out the things that the federal government could do, and anything that wasn’t covered in it was not allowable. But people were too worried that they would encroach on peoples rights so they created the Bill of Rights specifically naming things that the government wouldn’t be allowed to do. And now people have twisted it around until they think the federal government can do anything that the bill of rights doesn’t forbid them from doing and people only have the freedoms covered therein, which is a complete inversion of the intention.

+Nevir202 Take a look at the 9th amendment. It basically states the opposite of what you've said. The rights guaranteed in the bill of rights shall not be construed to mean that those rights are the only rights that the people have.

+Spammo270 The constitution is a document that both grants and limits power. The bill of rights were designed to limit the power of the government to infringe on the rights of the people and not to give rights to people.

Feyd Darkholme Nevir20 You are right Hamilton actually said that writing down people's rights was dumb because the rights were already garenteed even if not written down but the states wouldn't ratify the Constitution without the bill of rights and 230 different ones came in but was widdleld down to 12 only 10 passed but yes your exactly right 👏👏👏

Good one.

Isn't it also funny that SJW's, who say they hate cops, are always the first to call them, not when a crime is being committed, but when someone "offends" them?

Apple Lysol "Illegally talking about guns"....Sadly these days it's hard to tell if you're being sarcastic or if you're just that much of a moron.

Maybe the best comment so far.

What would one call that app...."Triggered Panic Button"

@@Chriswithoutahellcat it doesn't matter who's right or wrong, that's the point of these discussions, not forcing opinions on others. Just straight up friendly talking and pure facts.

Good for you sir

I've been told I'm left leaning but I love Shapiro and Crowder. I may not agree with either of them on everything (I agree with a lot) but the open dialogue they encourage is the best thing ever.

I feel like Shapiro is much more respectful in his debates. Crowder does good at defending his points but sometimes talks over and seems disrespectful.

Me too, brother

nah, i got this button on the phone......

As a woman, when I walk around at night, I carry a gun, so if threatened I can protect myself.

Timothy Mccarthy you missed that part?

"Nah, I have this button on my phone." How is that going to stop someone from hurting you? It takes time for the police to respond to a call. Average is about 20 minutes, what are you going to do for 20 minutes? Also, I wanted Steven to ask what they thought if someone was hurting them and a citizen with a gun came to their aid? Should the person carrying just let them hurt you or should they intervene?

"i feel threatened walking around at night as a woman" "i'm trans" did you also feel that threatened as a guy? which is what you are...

I'm actually really surprised and I'm super proud of Stephen for being is calm cool and collected is he was during that whole interview while the guy clearly uninformed about what's actually going on. Because on my side of the screen I was screaming at the guy the entire time

I know right? He accepted the fact that he was wrong when Crowder pointed out.

I agree. The second guy is a potential gun enthusiast. He just needs some good information and training. If I lived closer I would go shooting with him. Heck, if Crowder kept his information I would buy him his first year NRA membership.

I expected Steven to laugh when he brought up the young Turks.

Like...do you....do you know why the 2nd Ammendment was put in place? Ahahahah

Marc English i did too 😂😂😂 that person has A LOT to learn

Marc English Same lol

Guns aren’t effective Police are effective Police use guns Profit

People should trust the government to protect them Police brutality is very real Police are government agents Profit

Fuckin hate people like that

I was going to say the samething

Same thought

Delusion… interesting thought coming from a person in your predicament

@@dongearhart9194 They’re quoting somebody in the video, not themselves.

Like they say, "When seconds matter, the police are only minutes away."

I wonder if these snowflakes realize that guns can be made without the approval of the government. It's just knowledge: Physics, chemistry, and toss in a little metallurgy and you can *make* a gun. You can pass a law that says I can't; but it's a hard law to enforce. It's almost as if they think the government makes guns and regular people can't.

Not that I agree with her opinions, but I know what app she's talking about. You turn it on before you leave a building to walk to your car (or anywhere else) and hold your thumb on your screen. If your thumb comes off the screen at any time--if someone grabs you, for instance--within seconds local police receive a call for help with your GPS coordinates. There's something similar for Uber/Lyft rides as well, if you have a creepy driver. Not great for home invasions, but useful when walking across a dark campus.

And if I am a sufficiently tech minded attacker it's not all that hard to make a device that broadcasts so much RF noise the phone is worthless. I have a huge problem when people without scientific knowledge about the world make policies on it. Of course the statement above is extreme. However there are many, many other reasons that the data path from the phone all the way to the authorities can fail. Do you really want to trust your life to that stuff? I wouldn't (and I'm a telecomm engineer). There is of course the most obvious argument: That all the technology works perfectly and within a few 100 milliseconds the authorities are notified. By the time they get there: you are dead. An app on your phone is just that: an app on your phone. It's not a way to defend yourself. It's a way to send a message. One can't equate a phone with an app to a form of defense.

I wish Steven has pushed that issue. How long do the police take after you push the button?

Yeah, that is odd

Gotta make sure everyone knows, ya know?

WTF are you doing here??!!😂

@@ApexBizzySolutions I'm gay and I never get why people say it out loud and make it a big deal (saying that I just did that very thing. Only to explain my point though. Sorry😂)

Transgenders are like Vegans, they will throw it in some how one way or another

Chris Strong you win the comment section.

Legit laughed outloud. Love this.

Gold lmao

LMAO!!!

Chris Strong dude your a genius with that response. I am dying with laughter but your comment is so true.