Hahaha, way to make extra heat. Not that this is a real problem.

If the outside temperature is above the fridge temperature , what then ?

@Thierry Landrieu well Eskimos use refrigerators to keep stuff from freezing.

Ever check out how hot the backside of the fridge is?! lmao!!

@@lestermarshall6501 I can’t imagine how eskimos ate before fridges were invented . I must say I prefer warmer climates .

We already are suffering from global warming.

What could possibly go wrong?Everything.

Look into geoengineering, ionospheric heaters, NEXRAD

I thought she was going to say it is a self-correcting problem!

2476 "known" nuclear weapons testing, daily "conventional" explosions, land mines, Agent Orange.... What could go wrong? Btw, the carbon /toxicity boot print of the elephant in the room aka the military industrial complex anybody?

@disregardedkitchen scapegoats or space goats?

theyre made of concrete with no plants providing shade or converting the photons into sugar. With masses of humans and machines generating heat. So theyre giant heat engines and batteries. Another reason cities are horrible for the environment

I work in a city but live 45 minutes away. The temp drops at least 5 degrees when I leave the city.

maybe so but the surface area of earth covered by these hot spots is a drop in the bucket compared to the entire surface of the earth.

kill everything that isnt humIn

@@garymcmullin2292 this isnt remotely true. City "heat islands" are a huge problem

Artificial tornadoes: "what could possibly go wrong?"

Cremation is my last chance at a smoking hot body.

Ditto! There are layers here...

Now accepting Soylent Green volunteers (IT'S PEOPLE!!!) 📗📗

She actually said "it is probably the only fat burning exercise that really works." Not a very good joke from a German.

Maybe the AIs will be running the economy by then, and they'll barely notice our disappearance?

Hi Dave. Not all businesses would suffer. Take undertakers for instance---. Cheers, P.R.

😆😆😆 Yes, exactly, because AI/silicon-based lifeforms would take over

Actually that's what the author Thomas W. Murphy Jr has pointed out (at least in his blogposts from a decade ago, as well as in his 2021 book and 2022 article) : «steady» exponential growth - as we have known it since the beginning of the Industrial Age - cannot possibly continue, because it quickly runs into absurdities like this one, which we might be able to deal with, but then it keeps getting... exponentially harder as we have to keep building bigger and bigger «air conditioning units», then leave Earth, then Earth becoming a tiny fraction of the economic output... then our whole galaxy (only 1350 years to equal it with only star power !)... and at some point we might even run into (what we at least currently consider to be) a fundamental limit of trying to grow the surface available to us for dissipation to the outside universe faster than the speed of light ! Or on the other hand into the economic paradox of energy becoming an arbitrarily small (and exponentially shrinking) fraction of the economy, which is not a stable situation because at some point some group controlling a microscopic fraction of the economy would be able to corner the whole energy market, at which point they can increase prices arbitrarily high, at which point its fraction of the economy would stop exponentially shrinking - rather the inverse - etc.

Too bad her channel would get shabow banned if she mentioned the elephant in the room aka the military industrial complex...

@@lorenzoblum868 I'm sure Sabine would never fall so low!

*Politicians have entered the chat

@@WeighedWilson government is the entertainment division of the military industrial complex ~ Frank Zappa.

@@lorenzoblum868 That's one of the funniest things he ever said - one of them. Oh, I wish!

@@bobbytookalook it's an aesthetic irony.

@@bobbytookalook Who who think a German physicist had a sense of humour :P

"The only fat burning exercise that works", crematorium heated homes.

@@billboyd4051 that probably takes more energy than it's worth. Maybe heat from letting bodies decompose in the basement would be more efficient.

@@veganevolution Sabine spoke of a town doing it, thats why I quoted her.

yes its trasfer of latent heat energy from one source to another. Did you know the earth can be a heat battery? Pipe the hot water from the heat exchanger into earth pipes 300 feet down then over the summer it heats up the earth to supply warm water all winter long. The total power consumption is to make up for the remaining 10% or 20% to heat the house or non at all.

If the pool is cold, why would the house be hit?

​@@spyder2383The asphalt shingles on the roof reflect heat while the pool water retains the coolness of the night. By circulating water through pipes which cross the roof the water is heated by the reflected heat and the sun. So it will pull cool water from the pool, and return hot water. It can be turned on and off depending on water and air temp This allows the pool to be used during the months when pools are generally too cold to swim in.

Yes. I made a solar heater for my pool in Vegas with $20 in black plastic drip tubing. I spread the coils out on my metal porch cover and using elbows hooked it to the spigot on the side of the pool pump. The other end went in the pool. Then I ran the pool pump from 10 till 2 instead of the middle of the night. The water comes out of the pipe at 110°. Free heat.

​@@grumpy3543- free except for running the pump.

And your fish precooked in the ocean?

Love the dark humour

@@johnransom1146 I love all her humor.

I vote this as Sabine's best line so far in 2023.

It is cheaper to reduce the human population than to become space civilisation.

It's possible that you never bicycled 420 km / week at a fair clip for a few years.

They've already solved the problem. There are plans to use infrared emitters to convert heat to infrared and just beam it out into space.

Also no one cares 🙂

Why is heat such a bad thing? The most diversity of life and this plan is was when it was warm. The only thing that decimates life is ice and cold. It’s kind of hard to have life, if all your freshwater is tied up in ice cubes

​​@@Ont785 Heat is not a bad thing. The problem is when there's too much heat. Or too little, like you pointed out. The warming of the atmosphere already causes problems, and if the temperature continues to rise, we'll eventually face more problems and they'll be more severe. "The only thing that decimates life is ice and cold." Simply not true. Overheating, fire and drought also do the same.

@@lclMetal We are a long way from having an ecosystem that we used to! The is the reason why the a dinosaur fossils all across northern Canada. The only thing keeping humans from migrating were the glaciers. If your freshwater is tied up an ice, there are no animals and there are no people. Gee, what would Canada do if we had a longer growing season and more animals foraging northwards? Stop the fear mongering

🧂

"Educomedy" added to my dictionary - must use it.

"Educomedy has been a thing in the USA for a long time. The most politically informed on average there get it through comedy programs like The Late show.

Politicians, like fossil fuels, are a problem we can do without.

Agreed... and just to help out - they can take the methanogen problem or whatever it is I have/my gastrointestinal tract has to blimp up and float away!

Yes but sometimes she goes too far . This time for exemple, I really thought she was taking this exponential thinking to the letter …. I viewed up to the end but couldn’t get this nagging out of my mind . Exponentials always have limits in real life …. That is so obvious… so why even consider a model based on exponentials ?

​@@thierrylandrieu7441 You are correct. Sabine was Foul with the 1st part of this video and most especially by far the sickening clickbait title in order to get eye balls of both the coal-oil-gas-wealth Shill-Troll Junk-Science Liar-Imbeciles and also of the Guy McPherson General Purpose Imbecile set. Just to keep her Business Model healthy. I'll likely never think much good of her ever again.

@@grindupBaker I think I agree . Still there are some good videos …. And some people really think it would be good to cool the planet . Just thinking that makes me sick …. We were headed towards a cooling anyhow , and the carrying capacity of the planet 20 000 years ago was so small …. You know Peter’s law ? If something can go wrong it will , so a planet cooling system ….

Yes, but her delivery is so dry that it’s often difficult to distinguish between humour and seriousness.

Of course she is funny. She’s German. :)

in cold climates it's already cold, the fridge isn't doing much work anyway. In summer, try to open the door as briefly as possible, to keep hot air from coming in. Insulation will minimize the work done by the fridge. Think about this: if you cover the windows from outside, the sun hits those covers and they heat up. This is the same amount of heat produced if you let them in, only now it's inside. If you use AC, you pump the same heat out. What's the added heat? only the waste from operating the pump. Properly insulated houses cut down on a LOT of energy usage. Outside blinds too. Pump less, that's all. Cut down on energy use and the waste heat of our machines. Next step? properly designed airflow: natural cooling and natural heating just by thinking about airflow during design (hard to do once it's built).

@@MadsterV - That depends on how the temperature in the house is set. If you kept the environment in the home at the same temp (we'll say 20'C) all the time, the fridge will have to do the same amount of work all the time to keep the set temp. It always transfers the load to the HVAC of the home. But I would still be curious to see a stufy that explores "by how much".

@@benjammin1001 oh, I get it, yeah. From what I understand in many extreme cold climates, the "freezer" is just leaving stuff outside. Over here we don't do AC too often, because it doesn't dip too far below freezing but I could see myself unplugging it during the winter if it got worse, and just having a box outside.

Thought about it. It's a much, MUCH smaller volume of air to cool, and it's usually much better insulated too. The fridge will pump heat out only every once in a while (you can hear it when it does), not constantly like AC. You'll never notice your kitchen being hotter just because of the fridge. Also, unlike with AC, there is nothing inside the fridge generating heat, but human bodies produce heat constantly. On the other hand, we're talking about HEATING the house (in winter), so when the fridge pumps heat out, it's actually REDUCING the amount of work the AC does (by a negligible amount), In summer......I'd bet the difference would be hard to measure.

Yes, if we could use the cold outside to cool our homes that might help offset what goes on in the summer. But there is always waste heat

Crypto mining is doing an awful lot of environmental damage.

​@@frankshailes3205 😂😂 Yeah and so is fake news like Sabines

well don't worry about that waste heat cause both you and I will be long dead before we have to worry about that waste heat in our life times🤣

Unfortunately actual experiment disproves that hypothesis because we all died September 2019 owing to not much sea ice that year according to a "Guy McPherson" and the 0.00001% human billionaire psychopaths in bunkers can't possibly have been doing it all themselves for 3 years, so I think it's reached a Critical Social Tipping Point my British Railways mate Richard told me in 1976 where they calculated they only needed 12% more office staff at British Railways Reading and then they could remove the trains & track and the office staff could continue doing exactly what they'd always been doing, seamlessly without interruption or notice. I think this Critical Social Tipping Point has been passed by human species.

The millions of O'neal cylinders circling the sun will absorb enough energy to cool Earth.

Doomsday cult freaks. There's a 100% chance the interglacial epoch will end returning Europe and of Canada to year round winter. Could happen in 500 years, or maybe 5,000. But it is inevitable, the warm periods are shorter than the cold periods... We have 4 seasons per year, throughout a 70 year lifespan. The earth however, has its own cycles that are 10,000 - 20,000 years long, a 100,000 year cycle, and also a millions of year cycle. If it's too hot for your taste, just wait a thousand years. And don't worry, none of these things will bring about the rapture where all the air conditioned sinners are brought before the great climate gods where they will be judged and punished in the afterlife. Armageddon has been used so successfully to control populations for thousands of years. It's hilarious and disturbing to watch this happen during a time when anyone can read the actual science online for free. Even the ICC stuff is online and the cult members don't even read that stuff despite it being their own religious doctrine.

good ol' anti-natalism. hilarious.

The total power that reaches the earth from the sun is about 110,000 terawatts or 7,600 times more power than all of humanity produces, even assuming all of that power eventually became waste heat. Magnitudes matter.

"that it's free doesn't mean it insists on taking guns on its trip to the mall" lol, so naturally delivered.

I like the way you think.

Then imagine 3 or 4 hundred million households adopting the fix. There is no limit to our technophilia.

That's a really tough problem to try and solve. We currently don't even capture "waste" natural gas from oil wells, it gets flared off instead of saved and used. That's a relatively easy problem to solve compared to what you just suggested.

G'day, Oh, I say ...! Why hath nobody ever thunk of such a thang before thus, then, one wondurrz. Perhaps EVERYBODY who already knows the answer will sit silent while YOU go ahead and build one functioning Unit, for all those still wondering to observe your Results. My guess is that you WILL encounter a variety of the Principle of Elbarsoles, Arselbows, and even ElbArsEyeBalls... En Elbow is easy to design, and so is an Arsehole, but to build an Elbow which can also work as an Arsehole is as difficult as making a simple Arsehole which will function as an Elbow..., and an Elbow that works as an Arsehole, Eyeball and Testicle is really really difficult to imagine. So, if you can figure out how to retrofit your House so the Waste Heat from your Toaster and Hair Dryer, Computer and Microwave, with that from your Refrigerator and Air-Conditionining is recycled to produce your Electricity, while furnishing all your hot Water... After that, you might like to show us how to use the Waste Heat from your Road-Vehicle to operate your Washing-Machine. Ready...? Get set....,; Off You Go Then....! Double-Quick Olde Bean, Time is of the Essence ! Such is life, Have a good one... Stay safe. ;-p Ciao !

@@WarblesOnALot the age of aquarius beckons.

because climate scientists - at least those who believe in "green growth" - don't like to talk about that. those who do are mostly ignored (like timothy garret "civilization is a heat engine") or ridiculed as alarmists (like guy mcpherson; although he probably deserves that).

We use very little energy compared to the earth's imputs

It is when you consider active volcanoes and increased radiation due to a weakening magnetic field. This is bs.

Also if the ambient temp rises we need to use less power for heating (and more power for cooling). Overall, at temperate latitudes, more warmth is better.

Eh, but it's still rather insignificant. It only becomes a problem if people increase fossil & nuclear energy consumption 10x.

you do have her as your teacher ☺💜

Yeah she does alright so much so that I often find myself searching on her channel for clarification.

Neil Tyson - Dr Becky - Derek Muller - Scott Manley - Mark Rober and so many more do exactly what Sabine does.

There wasn't really any scientific topics in this video. Just rambling about waste heat, and if you think waste heat is a complicated subject, no wonder you believe this.

@@codejunki567 you lack awareness on how much regular people know about thermodynamics

ᵗʰᵃⁿᵏˢ ᶠᵒʳ ʷᵃᵗᶜʰⁱⁿᵍ😊, ʷʳⁱᵗᵉ ᵐʳ ᶠʳᵉᵈᵉʳⁱᶜᵏ ⁿᵒʷ, 📝ʷⁱᵗʰ ᵗʰᵉ ʷʰᵃᵗ ˢᵃᵖ ˡⁱⁿᵉ 𝟏𝟖𝟐𝟓𝟖𝟎𝟐𝟏𝟖𝟓𝟔, ᵗᵒ ᵖᵃʳᵗⁱᶜⁱᵖᵃᵗᵉ ⁱⁿ ᵒᵘʳ ᶜᵘʳʳᵉⁿᵗ ⁱⁿᵛˢᵗᵐᵉⁿᵗ ᵐᵉⁿᵗᵒʳˢʰⁱᵖ ⁱⁿˢⁱᵍʰᵗˢ, 😊❤🙏,,

I studied Government Propaganda and determined that everything you are talking about falls squarely into that category. Sad

@@jomamma1750 Sadly, I have to agree with you. Normally Sabine makes excellent and even handed videos, but not where the subject of climate change is concerned. Academics need to be a bit more cool-headed. For sure, I am all for reducing fossil fuels (we still need plastics) and reducing any pollution including CO2 (currently rising yet long term still modest at 0,04% of our atmosphere). I can also have some sympathy for NGO/government promoted ‘exaggeration of fear’ for the good cause. But there are limits. There are people within our (un)elected leadership with a lot of influence who cannot distinguish between facts and exaggerated fear and they literally see humanity as a threat they need to deal with now. All software induced hockey stick models and theories from academics aside, we should first focus on UNBIASED measurement data sets. If it comes to temperature, ancient ice core measurement is the only thing free from academic modelling and bias. We thus need to look at the GISP2 Greenland data and recognise Earth’s climate is inherently cyclical. Climate has always changed and always will. The current changes are NOT out of long term bandwidth. As for short term changes in temperature; the most UNBIASED measurement is the rise of worldwide ocean water. It is monitored and currently stands at 1.8mm per year average, which is EXACTLY the average of ocean water rise since Pleistocene. Notice, the club of Rome 50 years ago predicted a 4 metre rise for 2025. Now in 2023, almost 50 years later we measure…. 9 cm actual increase. Let that sink in and lets collectively feel ashamed. IPCC even very ashamed. Again, yet we need to make the fuel transition but videos like these are of no help to humanity. As for Sabines Q increase due to increased human need of energy. It is historically insignificant to the solar radiation output fluctuations (scheduled to take a downturn next year). It is well withing the parameters Earth’s biosphere can stabilize. A higher Q in general means higher altitude cloud formation, thus higher albedo (thus more solar input shielding) and the higher CO2 in combination with higher Q output is a positive for plant life in general and specifically at higher altitudes, thus more absorption of CO2, downscaling Q. But regardless. Yes, we need to be careful and make the switch to nuclear faster. But no, CO2 and current fluctuations are well within parameters Earth can handle. Earth’s population is heading downwards after 2060. We can feed all and each individual is worth-while and welcome on this planet. We will be fine as long as we take good care of the environment. Earth will be fine in all cases longer term, long after we are gone. And if you still suffer from anxiety after watching Sabine’s video, pls be sure to also check out George Carlin’s ‘saving the planet’ for some relief.

@@RWin-fp5jn You've been reading the propaganda as well. I used to work at a science station, the actual Ocean rise between 1995 and 2015 was .020 of an inch total or 1 one-thousandth of an inch per year. Quit believing ANYTHING that these people say. It is ALL propaganda.

I think we are so advanced that we now try and shape the world to our liking and that isn't normal we are the only species evolved enough to do that, this us very off topic btw but I feel the earth will undergo its natural cycles and changes over the next 10 or 20 thousand years and by then at least one event would have caused 99% human population decrease, not total extinction but there's so many of us that if 1% survived or even just like 1 million people, the human race would rise and again just as we have over the last 10000 years, my point being we tend to separate our selves from nature from the universe but we are the universe, we are made up of the universe and the universe and earth doesn't care about humans it'd gonna undergo its natural order so it prospers until it's end, so instead of trying to manipulate the earth. I've decided to take enjoyment out of looking the inevitable truth in the eyes, whether I'm here to see it or not the earth won't be here forever, nothing will and humans are just a moment in time just like the moment u just look to read this, life is just a collection of moments and we are trying to sway away from that truth and trying to make a new one, a truth where we can live forever and control planets and whatnot but maybe we were never meant to understand and conquer maybe we weren't meant to simply experience life, no one has experienced life in 100% the same way that you have, so what do you make of the world?

But the video says that the problem with waste heat is that it has exponential growth. Which is it?

@@DF-ss5ep waste heat is the result of energy use, which is coupled with economic growth

@@DBagg-zz4ip Yes, so if exponential economic growth can't last, then exponential energy consumption can't last, so we will never have this problem

@@DF-ss5ep Right. The problem is our political-economic system is built around the assumption of growth

Growth being "exponential" is always nonsense.

Me too. I’ve wondered about heat.

well good? i prefer the monty pyton

@@omblauman ahh yes me too... Monty Pyton, the fameist comedy troup from Youganda

​@@omblaumanMonty Python famously didn't tell jokes, but they did absurdist satire.

​@@ppetal1 Which brings us back around to Sabine.

@Peter Leonard Gates, it seems you're confusing the (mostly) British comedy troupe "Monty Python", who indeed, did not tell jokes, with "the monty pyton" (definite article, lower case m, lower case p, no h in pyton) who did. Also, please don't confuse "the monty pyton", with monty pytonn (with 2 "n"s) most famous for their dead toucan skit!

Where? In US northeast, we had a very hot winter. Very little snow, hight temperatures, no major storms where I live. Schools didnt close as they usually do. Not coldest in living memory at all. Hottest.

Try PBS's KZfaq channel spacetime. Matt has cover so much physics really well..

Weird, because it's one of the few explanations that I hated.

🙄🤫how much do you make for fake reviews

@@richinoable I take it you don't agree?

@@johnkooy5327 top level assumption. Mmhmm

This problem is actually very easy to solve. We just need to nuke the ice cap on the north pole and use a fleet of big ships to push the pieces of broken ice in the atlantic and pacific oceans...

Heat pollution already has a significant local impact for big power plants, and on rivers and lakes used for cooling. Anti-renewable energy and pro-nuclear sentiment, built up over decades through PR, strategically dismisses the subject.

So the question becomes, why has the temperature only increased 1.1 degrees Celsius in the last 250 years then? Why isn't the temperature increase accelerating as quickly as we create more waste heat year over year?

This is a foul junk-science video title about apparently a paper crafted by imbecile scientists who predict that humans will use 10,000 times as much energy as right now in just 400 years. Absolute garbage, precisely matching your so-called brain.

@@kayakMike1000 This is a foul junk-science video title about apparently a paper crafted by imbecile scientists who predict that humans will use 10,000 times as much energy as right now in just 400 years. Absolute garbage, precisely matching your so-called brain.

Awesome is the right word !

She's played with the humor content of the channel. Some videos went a little overboard with the jokes but this video is in just the right place in my opinion.

IKR best deadpan

Yes, but it moves heat more efficiently than anything else we've tried; vapor-phase-change refrigeration gets you 3:1 joules moved versus joules required to do the moving.

Solar isn't that great because solar panels are only 25% efficient and plus you'll have to use them to charge batteries. Some solar plants have been abandoned because they're crap.

@@chompchompnomnom4256 The abandoned plants are not solar panels but the mirror to heat molten salt idea, which was badly implemented. Solar panels are fine, you are correct that storage is a issue most don't appreciate fully but with the advancement of numerous battery technologies we are probably going to have solved that in the next 5 years (will still take 20 years to deploy probably).

Seems like an easier solution would be to just stop relying on a growth-based economy. We've only been rapidly increasing our rate of consumption, our population, our environmental impact for a few hundred years. Population growth is already ending -- we could choose to end the other 2 as well. Any way you slice it, capitalism is bound to be a relatively short-term temporary affair.

​@@dr.zoidberg8666 No growth means that new technology doesn't develop. Population growth means more people to think of solutions to cancer and energy, or to design new video games and clothes. When the world's population was 1 billion, everybody lived in extreme poverty.

@@williamanthony915 No, it doesn't. It means consumption doesn't increase over time. Almost all technological development is done by the public sector, not the private sector. It turns out that profit is a terrible incentive for actual innovation because real fundamental R&D is very costly & uncertain.

@@dr.zoidberg8666 So the government made the personal computer, not Steve Wozniak? The government made the iPhone, not Steve Jobs? The government made re-usable rockets, not Elon Musk? Prior to 1900, the government didn't fund energy research, and things like electricity and the steam engine were invented. If we left phone R&D to the government, do you really think it would've been as beautiful as the iPhone?

@@dr.zoidberg8666 I personally invest a lot of money into small modular nuclear reactors (in a private company research and developing them). It's an uncertain investment, and the whole process is very costly, but there's a chance it will produce a lot of money for me, which is why I do it.

Watch one every week and before the year is out you will know more than 95% of all politicians

And you will still know nothing about science.

​ @eriktempelman2097 95% of all politicians. A Yank politician who is on the "I'm with science" team, not the "my money's from mega-money-burning-carbon" crowd said "Greenland lost 12.5 BILLION gallons of water in a SINGLE DAY ! Can you believe it !???" It was actually 12.5 billion tonnes of water in 1 day, which is only 4.1 times Greenland's regular daily Spring+Summer ice loss since hundreds/thousands of years ago and the "spectacular" 12.5 Gt on that single, absurdly unusual, July day is now just 2.7 times Greenland's regular daily Spring+Summer ice loss. Politicians. LOL.

Her videos are awesome

Because this has nothing to do with science. Politics + Engineering Science.

I enjoy her sarcastic wit that is subtlety interjected into the mix.

What the adi?

So you think the oceans will be boiling because of wasteheat in 4 centuries?

she is the best

"powered by the waste heat of builtin computer" 80 watts (1 W is equal to 3.41 BTU/h) or 272.8 BTU/h. "It was originally defined as the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of one pound of water by one degree Fahrenheit." Thus, a typical 40 gallon hot water heater being used to cool a computer would give each gallon 6.82 BTU/h. Since a gallon is a bit over 7 pounds, That's a bit less than 1 degree (F) per hour of operation. It would take several days of continued operation to heat water to lukewarm.

You know, with the man-made tornado's we could have the flying cars without a source of "free energy" to move the car. We also could having the flying pigs and , as a result , the solar shield bult on the moon. I feel like the new Elon Musk already ! 😂🤣

Another one: _Big data is a particular great source for hot air_

​@@PolCornelis 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Man made horrors beyond our comprehension.

Sadly, she sais unscientific things that fit the political agenda. We can easily start an ice age (bring dust to stratosphere with a controlled nuclear winter. Now what will she do in ice age, when a glacier approaches her house? (spoiler: she thinks, that loosing her grants funding is much more real, than the global warming, ice age, etc).

And they say Germans have no humour... There's a Mercedes which obeys spoken commands. "Windscreen wipers on" etc. To the command "tell me a joke" it responds, "this is a German car. We do not tell jokes! "

@@leonardgibney2997 And there’s always German politics to keep people laughing! 😋

It is cheaper to reduce the human population than to become space civilisation that builds stuff in space.

I mean, true, but only by definition. "If we survive long enough for the problem to no longer be a problem, the problem will no longer be a problem."

@@o0alessandro0o Well, what I was thinking was that if we survive 400 more years that problem will have likely either been solved through technology or human adaptability. Also, if human society somehow collapses either by war or social upheaval, this will still not likely be THE problem 400 years from now. So we will either have the technology to offset the warming, or we will be producing less waste heat.

@@answerman9933 That is not a significantly different definition, for certain values of "survive", "human" and "adaptability" :P

also the banning of high sulfur bunker fuels for ships , basically burning asphalt, reduced particle sin the atmosphere which increased solar warming by not blocking the sun.

@northvegassailrabbit3642 Yes indeed. You authors couldn't determine whether the night time cooling because less cirrus cloud was greater than the day time warming or less than the day time warming. They stated that right at the start of the published scientific paper. Ever since then liars everywhere have been ignoring that crucial finding and lying that fewer contrails will increase global warming and by some absurd junk-science amount like a large fraction of a degree, all based entirely on lies and nothing at all. We even had a liar on our CBC Canada "science show" pronounce that huge lie out to the Public on our national radio (bit like living in Ruzzia eh).

It bugs me...planes flying above thirty thousand feet cross us (San Antonio, Texas) hundreds of times daily, not landing here. What should be clear sunny winter days are often overcast with spreading contrails by eleven AM. Can it be for safety, in case a plane got into trouble? I doubt it. But with an open mind of the moment, I think it is a coordinated effort to shade the surface transportation traffic emissions to hold down the NOx and Ozone (smog). Thence, my problem in the afternoon as the "saved" smog precursors and the city island heat dome extend out northward to where we live...MyRadar app notifies me that the air is less than healthy, bad for poor breathers, or downright bad for anybody.

@@ronblack7870 interesting to see your comment from 5 months ago on something that got into the news only recently! 🙂

@@danielmcwhirter there is no "coordinated effort" to produce contrails. It just happens depending on the temperature and water content of the air. Apparently there are now efforts to redirect planes to areas or altitudes where contrails are not created to "save the climate" (which is nonsense as it is just water that will rain down quickly enough).

The oceans will only boil if the atmosphere also gets to 100 Centigrade. I don’t think we will be around to harness any of it !

So simple and full of fallacies. Perfect for the uninitiated layman.

@@gickygackers On the contrary, I'd say her channel was pretty accurate. At what point in this video did she commit a fallacy?

​@@vaughanpratt6469 predicting the year the oceans boil is a fallacy.

In my view, the earth is quite large and changes temperature slowly. So there is a lot of inertia involved. Once the temperature starts to change, it takes some time for the cause of the change to cease so the temperature change can start reversing. There are also external causes, like big volcanoes or asteroid impacts that can cause cooling and upset the thermal balance. Ice caps reflect heat too, so once they grow larger it may take a while for things to warm up again.

If your concern is from aircraft contrails they have a temporary effect on the outgoing long-wave radiation (OLR) from the Earth's surface,but it is not a significant long-term effect. During the daytime, contrails can actually have a warming effect by reflecting sunlight back to the surface, which can increase the surface temperature but also reflect energy back into space. However, at night, the contrails can act as a barrier to outgoing long-wave radiation from the Earth's surface. This can temporarily trap some of the radiation and lead to a slight warming effect. However, this effect is typically short-lived, as contrails are relatively short-lived themselves and dissipate within a few hours. Probably, the overall impact of contrails on the Earth's energy balance is relatively small compared to other factors such as greenhouse gas emissions and natural climate variability. Therefore, while contrails may have some temporary effect on OLR, they are not a significant factor in long-term climate change. I also think somehow the earth will boil this soon is not exactly correct as essentially all local energy is ultimately from the sun regardless of our sourcing and we are still emerging from and ice age no time to panic yet.

Cold is a lot scarier than heat.

​@@sauvagesparrow8026I can add more layers, I can only take off so much.

​@@holyheretic3185 you can grow vegetables in a greenhouse, not a freezer

@@mattkonetski9818 anyone can build a greenhouse.

those Canadians had it coming

Also, solar panels are far darker than the average piece of land on which it would be placed, which means that less sunlight is reflected back into space.

@@noergelstein yes. Some studies show that covering a significant amount of the Sahara with solar panels could totally change the climate in the region.

I've got a Planetary Air Conditioner, and I'm not afraid to use it! Current output prevents 250 tons of ice from melting per year.

just make sure your spray paint does not contain greenhouse gases.

What is the name of that spray paint? I want to buy it

@@soniagheza391 With a bit of web searching, I believe it's described as self-cooling paint, the first brand of which comes up in a quick search is PARC (which stands for PAssive Radiative Cooling). The company website says it's specifically designed to radiate infrared into the sky. There may be aftermarket resellers or off-brands of the stuff, I don't know where to get it. It doesn't seem to be sold in spray can form, you'll need a paint sprayer.

Wrong wavelength of infrared... It may cool a building, but the emitted heat is still trapped by the atmosphere as explained by Sabine.