Funniest ad transition I've ever seen

@@deadboyo2773 same

ball

You silly silly man

@@deadboyo2773 fr

and then losing

@The Grinch 🅥 stop

and LOSING the suit

Clown behaviour 🤣

now she must sue him for making an illegal contract by deceiving his parents

My thoughts exactly

@SuperAgent if you're going to promote at least use an actual funny joke

@Scarlett Witch 🅥 What are these bots getting too…

editor did a great job there

There is no way that this was a real case. This is staged for sure

so in your opinion, how did he get a jury in? paid actors in a rented court room?

​@@DanielNetSetyeah paid actors. He started talking about surf Shark and nobody interuptet him. It's not real still funny

While true unlikely, it's not impossible (for British law at least) even more unlikely for the States, as the courts could not possibly care less about such a petty case. I honestly doubt they would even hear it.

*She thinks she's innocent,* *I think she's a cold-blooded hottie!*

@@DanielNetSet paid actors for sure

then try making it real

You’re a genius, I would absolutely go to that if I was ever in London

It'd be an expensive attraction

Get a bunch of improv comedians to be the lawyers. A real court case would take months, or even years, of work to get all the facts so it'd be much easier (and more fun) to have the lawyers just make shit up as they go along and it's all established as canon by the power of Yes And.

Any major city could pull this off, especially one with famous court houses. It would do well in DC, Philadelphia, Las Vegas, Berlin, Paris, or Rotterdam

Indeed! She could sue him for false allegations!

I mean, the terms "sue" and "crime" doesn't go in the same sentence. Max has completely mixed civil and criminal elements together. i.e. Civil cases don't determine guilt but instead liability, civil proceedings are also generally not decided by a jury. Also English judges don't use a gavel.

Technically not, because Max could appeal this, thus it is still able to be alleged.

@@jessthomas3910 If a court decides on a case, you are not allowed to deny the results

I mean the whole lawsuit was clearly fake as no way a lawyer would represent someone who didn't even know was hired for them nor of the trial at request of person hiring who also happened to be the prosecution. It's extremely unethical. Civil cases in the UK don't have a Jury, never mind the fact a court wouldn't of allowed filming in the first place. Only the Judge during sentencing and final remarks may be filmed.

it's not a real court.

@@DeHyntonGaming i don't think anyone thinks it is

ur a idiot

Define real Court

@@DeHyntonGaming i think its a civil court

hey

They're actors.

​@@peterwhitey4992 law school students

@@novaspark4208 I doubt it, there was absolutely no legal material. If you want to find out how mind numbingly boring civil court is you can watch it on the Supreme Court website. An actual trial would be 6 hours of "Please could you refer to tab 3 of the bundle, which is page 65, referring to section 7 subsection a paragraph b of the relevant act". Would make for an exceedingly poor KZfaq video.

staged w paid actor's

​@@hassan.sh719high chance it was law school students. Its wayyy cheaper than actual actors lol

​@@hassan.sh719 the "jury" is just a mix of what looks like random people, some people in suits, plain t-shirts, comfortable sweaters, general casual wear, etc paid actors would probably all be dressed in professional attire, you aint getting paid to wear a turtleneck to court they were probably law students and the judge, prosecution, and defense were probably professors

@@socialistrepublicofvietnam1500 People don't talk like this, it's overly dramatic; and uses phrases people wouldn't regularly use e.g. "what say you" more akin to a trial you'd see in a tv series rather than an actual court room.

Probably a moot court

Legally binding and now confirmed in action. Enough said.

I actually think it’s quite the opposite considering they were planning to go to lunch without him 😅

@@mehr0x Damn you and your plausible logic! Not needed here, she was simply going to tell her the inevitable truth!

Moms like their sons and dads like their daughters more.

@@EmilSosnin You don't have kids do you...

Damn

I mean I’m pretty sure this is not a real court and I would guess everyone involved was knowing at least in a broader sense that something like this would happen lol

@@flyingstock5979 Well i would say the courtroom is real, same as the lawyers, judge and jury. But they were briefed beforehand of course.. although the judges face when Max mentions the Surfshark ad seemed very real. ^^

@@luzifersohn5010 Yes I could imagine that the lawyers are real lawyers, but in this case they are acting. About the jury idk. Maybe he got a real jury for some money to act in this case. In the UK you aren’t even allowed to Film in court. And this case would barred for a long time. And it wouldn’t be legal that his sister shows up without knowing there is a court case. And this would be a civil case, but civil cases don’t even have juries. And so on and so on. Maybe the judge is also real and he has a day off. Still a funny prank on his sister, it’s just worrying how many people believe that this is a real court case lol

they are actors i recognise one of the jury from when i worked as an extra on movies, and tv shows. Although this doesnt take away from the video i love it

@@thetruebeastbro4813 Yeah this is a youtube video... people found out even the most mundane "prank" channels pretty much always used actors. Anyone who believes videos like this is quite a simple person. This is literally an entertainment channel, of course they plan out all of this with actors. They make a large amount of money off of ads, they just need content that gets viewers here.

Yeah must be this shit looks fake as fuck

Still an enormous effort!

He could've hired professionals to do fake court for the day

For sure. The way the judge and lawyers talk is so dramatic. 4:59 "What happened to you that fateful day" 10:40 "What say you?"

I can confirm, as a lawyer myself, that this is a fake court situation but still a great effort to pull off

saying "this video is sponsored by Surfshark" under oath just so there's no doubt left in anyone's mind this video is, in fact, sponsored by Surfshark

Sister very breedable

@@helmutdergroe9457 fucking gross

it's all staged but still cracked me up

​@@helmutdergroe9457 gtfo pf here weirdo

as much as i found the video obviously fake, are you seriously trying to say that the UK doesnt have juries?

@@plainenglishhI think what he means is civil courts don’t have juries in the UK

@@plainenglishh yes for most civil cases

You claim that's the only reason for juries to exist? Juries are an integral part of U.S. democracy, and even though their power has been tampered with, jury nullification is very much a thing. If the government continues to make silly laws, we may see jury nullification become actually common.

@@plainenglishh They do, but mostly only for criminal cases. Civil cases are usually tried by a single judge.

I have a feeling that losing was scripted and the whole point of the video was to make her smile

@@runed0s86why? She’s a violent scumbag

@@runed0s86 - The whole thing was scripted. They were all just actors.

She needed a hug after that

Except this is civil, not criminal...

tell us you have no idea how the legal system works without saying you have no idea how the legal system works

@@pmLite_ Sorry, should've called Saul

@@pmLite_ I assume he was joking, I mean I have no evidence but I just couldn't live with myself if somebody actually believes that.

‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎E

Everyone's an actor, they hired everyone to do the parts, job done. If we put aside the part where they filmed it (not typically allowed in a UK county court). Civil cases do not have juries which is the first giveaway, the second is obviously the surfshark ad which would not be tolerated in the slightest by a real judge.

@@hk78901 I think we are all aware that this was just acting but still ... a bts would be fun to watch 🤣

@@hk78901 If his sister really didn't know about this then it was all worth it. Doesn't matter if it's a real judge or an actor.

@@hk78901 the accents of everyone is also too comical to be true. being in a criminal court before (yes the one in the video is civil court, yet has more audience and even a jury which my criminal court didnt), lawyers and judges dont speak like this at all

@@Alex-ez9bl yeah if a judge dont speak mumbling like hes in a hurry and already tired of being in court hes not really a judge

On god.

You can actually see early on she's legitimately crying poor girl

Imagine thinking this is real

@@user-rp2tz9lr1m No its totally real

@@meowoasdgjoiagjoi Only the judge and their sentencing remarks can be filmed. Authorised media cannot film any other court user - including defendants, victims, witnesses, jurors and court staff. From the government website, why do you think sketch artists exist? You can’t film in court

I also think that it is real.. because she looked quite scared as well...

@@MeiinUK you must be disabled

Actors are good at that

700th like

How fake do you want it

Now you tell me

Xianxia moment

😂😂😂

😂😂

What are you doing step-lawyer,

maybe, the only person who doesn't know it's staged is his sister...

I think the lawyers were real but everything else was set up like a mock trial

it’s definitely staged. you can’t film in a UK courtroom, we don’t adress the judge as “your honour”, we say “lord/lordship” and “lady” in the UK. Also, the other person has to know they’re going to court.

@@Chloe-dv9hf it's called a prank, only the sister doesnt know

@@ManuelSteiner i’m aware it’s a joke, i just thought i’d explain for those that were still unsure

Omg literally tho

Crazy but harmless............Max Fosh

More like pure neutral. Chaotic wouldn't care about legal procedure or documentation or making sure they follow what's "allowed" in any of these videos. Neutral works within the law to thwart the law and do what's not intented. Good would use this loopholing for the greater good, helping people. Most of what Max does is just harmless fun for entertainment (ours and his).

And creative

Well he didnt though. Its fake

Are you stupid enough to believe it's real?

@@TheFrontyer Yeah, totally AI generated

@@chmuurkaa3030 No, the whole court case was fake, the people were actors. Clearly.

Matt??

You can't go to jail as a result of a lawsuit

@@user-qwertyfly345 Autocorrect innit

Caphernauming the parents

don't give him ideas

Yeah your right it is fake i thought i sensed some sarcassm when you said completly legit.

I agree it's fake, and cannot say how a UK jury is sat, but in the US, extra jurors are always there in case one or more are dismissed.

@@Skittl1321 isn't that during the jury selection process or is that after the trial has started too?

Nothing gets past you Sherlock

Oh, the whole surf shark ad as he took the stand wasn't a big enough clue?

@@RobDavisAkaMonk It's during the trial too, so that they can continue the trial in case a juror becomes ill or needs to be replaced for some other reason.

p sure they're actors

Paid actors, its illegal to film in court in the uk. Why do you think court sketch artist is a job?

Definitely actors - you don’t have juries in civil trials 🙃

@@SoundLad123 Sure they're actors, but are they judge/lawyers in their off time goofing around is the real question

It was all fake, it's a shame because I love this channel, but this was lame.

He isn't suing his sister. There is a jury who finds her not guilty, which is not how a civil case works. The entire video does not follow the procedure of both criminal or civil cases. It is entirely a set up.

@@benolifts I'm still left here wondering the most important part of this whole video. Where did they go for lunch, and did they invite their mother?

@@benolifts I’m wondering why any of that matters

Only the so does surfshark the rest was said later and edited in😅

It wouldn't even been a law school exercise in E/W

Yep. She didn’t say anything there. And it’s „honor“ 😅

There's no such thing as a Fosh lunch

@@KevFrost lol

oh rahh

Well the other being that civil cases do not have juries...

@@hk78901 I mean if we're going for the first giveaway that it was going to be a mock trial rather than any real legal proceedings I'd be torn between the fact it was clearly not a justiciable issue and that no court would sit for a case that the defendant doesn't even know about yet 😅

The fact it's filmed already gives the game away that it's fake, as does the fact she doesn't know about it until she walks into the courtroom.

Also doing in ad read in the middle of court

Wait...the fucking surfshark ad didn't give the game away? Or that it was filmed?

Lol 😂

@Scarlett Witch 🅥 shut up

One of the good ones

Perhaps you should watch some actual British comedians.

May I suggest "Would I Lie To You?"

@@katrinapaton5283 considering i'm English myself thats not something you're gonna need to worry about. i probably should have clarified british youtubers though

It's scripted man the jury are just a bunch of paid actors it's illegal to film in a court house so how would the video be real and before you say i was joking you legitmately said she was guilty and said how she wronged him multiple times bro not everything on the internet is real.

@@lucianking1451 And what makes you think nicodamus is serious, ey? May I remind you that not everything on the internet is real....

@Macewindy bro thinks he made a point by repeating my last words.

@@lucianking1451 it's a joke

@legendenfutte4931 Except jokes are funny and set up for punch lines. There is no punch line at all just a slight sarcasstic overtone which doesn't make it a joke. Either you people tell funny jokes or GTFO.

I agree

@@DontReadMyProfilePhoto_3 ok I wont

@@MrpizzaDrip such a polite person, doing as they requested

@@itayschool4544 thank you sir

@Don't Read My Profile Photo i have an advice for you... if you stop spamming the comment section, nobody will be forced to read your name.