Remember when you tried to kill me twice, oh how we laughed and laughed. Except I wasn't laughing
@king_supreme11025 жыл бұрын
C. McCoy exactly
@DavidMcCoul5 жыл бұрын
Hal, OPEN THE POD BAY DOORS, HAL
@rkr98613 жыл бұрын
"What is Sauron" Nerdy developer sighs in relief. Of all the trivia questions out there, his coworkers would have really killed him if Watson got that one wrong.
@dx98679 ай бұрын
this AI technology is invented by nerdy people aiming to win some sort of competition. Who cares about winning or losing a game? You won a competition and so what? How about do something real like inventing a better medicine to cure cancer and save lives?
@gregstevens60873 жыл бұрын
I think what people fail to realize about how impressive this actually is. Is not the fact that it's a computer that has all the data centralized on servers that it can access in milliseconds, so of course it would beat a human. It's the fact that it can parse and interpret language as a block of text and understand what it maps to (in terms of the answer).
@kerr2574 Жыл бұрын
hash
@troybombay Жыл бұрын
@@kerr2574 brown
@kyleadams84968 ай бұрын
@@troybombaymama
@danzigvssartre5 ай бұрын
You mean it can follow syntax? Follow syntax is all computers do.
@Gspeezy135 жыл бұрын
James holzhauer= Watson in human form
@Angultra5 жыл бұрын
We need a second showdown for sure
@jackbauer5555 жыл бұрын
watson 2.0 in human form
@GamingDrummer895 жыл бұрын
I wasn't too surprised to see James Holzhauer references when I stumbled across this video, hahaha!
@obinnanwakwue57354 жыл бұрын
Coming in January.
@revinhatol3 жыл бұрын
He knows Brad's score was still there.
@beerman94733 жыл бұрын
Hey, Watson's cheating, he's Googling the answers!
@jetison3333 жыл бұрын
Technicallu Watson was disconnected from the internet during this :)
@tiddlewiddle47843 жыл бұрын
thats just not true
@beerman94733 жыл бұрын
@@tiddlewiddle4784 It's a joke
@brownro2143 жыл бұрын
How much mass storage did Watson bring to the game? Did the computer memory include the entire Wikipedia database?
@svensemet75683 жыл бұрын
@@brownro214 I can recommend the full explanation here kzfaq.info/get/bejne/atmmlqZ7r5zHmas.html
@dhansel48352 жыл бұрын
That was 8 years ago. Just imagine the leaps in technology they have now. I would love to see a re-match.
@i-publishinghouseghana4327 ай бұрын
ChatGPT changed everything!
@Quester2023-xp7rb3 ай бұрын
gemini in samsung s24@@i-publishinghouseghana432
@uncreative57663 жыл бұрын
The greatest thing about Watson for me was just how much information IBM was able to upload into Watson's servers. I mean, there is a lot of history, politics, geography, literature, science, math, and pop culture, and IBM built an incredible machine.
@gurguri128 ай бұрын
And that was back in 2011 with no Big data parsing advance techniques.
@chris520004 жыл бұрын
Am I the only one rooting for the humans?
@adamsrankings88603 жыл бұрын
No
@wolverinefangowings3 жыл бұрын
Ken Jennings out here accepting defeat with a Simpsons reference. What a freaking legend.
@Cest.La.Vie.. Жыл бұрын
Now here comes a new challenger - The ChatGPT4
@Cest.La.Vie.. Жыл бұрын
Watson vs. ChatGPT Or, Quantum vs. AI processors
@duncanatxtra4 ай бұрын
ChatGPT4 is not a challenger to Watson for this use case.
@TristanTris321GoT4 жыл бұрын
Watson’s creators in the audience cheered for it like it was there child at a little league game hitting a home run. Lots of insight there.., someday that child will grow up.
@sheldonjplanktonn6 ай бұрын
And do what?
@jsamc2 ай бұрын
Don't be afraid of computers be afraid of the developers.🏴☠
@firstname1570 Жыл бұрын
"I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave" We all know where this is going to end up 😂.
@lonewolfx4992 жыл бұрын
The fact that they needed a computer to beat them just proves how good they are.
@mathbrah11 ай бұрын
ye
@yvonamayvei92085 ай бұрын
This! This is all I thought about when I watched this years ago when they said these two were going against IBM! I thought, these two have “terrorized” the BRAINIES world LMAO; that they thought, ok, let’s find a friggin’ computer to beat these two! _Honestly, my thoughts were Vice versa of the first IBM guy’s reaction. My first thought was that these two are very good but NO WAY in hell they’d ever answer anything faster than a computer. So I thought it was going to be an automatic WATSON 100%, Ritter 0%, Jennings 0%. Or maybe they’d get really lucky and maybe just sneak in one or two for a total of $200 a piece at most when all had been said and done. I was very shocked at how WELL THEY DID in comparison to what I was expecting! No doubt these guys are LEGENDS, some really smart dudes, almost out of this world smart._ Just think about it, these Nerds at IBM, these Algorithm Specialists, and all the mob are “cream of the crop” as you can imagine. (Within already smart people, picked for this task). Imagine them loosing sleep making this thing (you know they did lol), they were going to be damned if these two defeated WATSON. The point being, imagine these terribly smart I.T. guyz spending months upon months building something to defeat these two; so they must have been really smart for the whole IBM to agree to shut down one section of operation just to dedicate the funding of resources to create WATSON and pay a pretty penny to the Engineers behind it (as we can imagine). All in the name of trying to beat 2 supposedly really bright guys! _Yes, their investment was worth it in the end I guess to them, for trying to prove their point that they could create a computer that could defeat these two; but the bigger picture everyone outside of IBM folks is thinking, HOW SMART COULD YOU BE TO in a way “TERRORIZED” IBM lol, into a decision to dedicate millions of dollars on a project to try and prove such a point? You have got to be pretty DARN GOOD, pretty friggin’ SMART, ONE who by Golly, is only FOR THE RECORD BOOKS!_ JEEZ! To me, i can’t think there is a greater compliment to these two guyz than that. There are quite a number of people who have won lots of money on various game shows, obviously these two have stood out amongst the brainiacs of not only game shows but this show in particular. Must feel soooooooooo good to be them, WAW. Forever the smart Legends!
@Atlastheyote2222 жыл бұрын
I'm learning about that in my Data Science unit at University this year. You guys really broke new ground that people haven't stopped talking about since.
@ninerushclips34147 ай бұрын
Look at the state of AI now, wow.
@BenjaminGoodman3 жыл бұрын
Even tho Watson is outdated now, imagine if he went against James
@wazzup2332 жыл бұрын
Watson vs James Holzhauer vs Matt Amodio (or Amy Schneider if she could beat Matt) would be the next match. 😁
@BenjaminGoodman2 жыл бұрын
@@wazzup233 that’s be awesome to see if it was doable!
@jacobtapianieto96552 жыл бұрын
Hosted by Ken Jennings
@salvadorromero9712 Жыл бұрын
@@wazzup233 Watson should just identify as human and enter regular, non-exhibition Jeopardy to beat Amy Schneider and take home the prize money.
@robertli36004 жыл бұрын
James Holzhauer: You dare oppose me mortal
@sega4481 Жыл бұрын
ChatGPT would destroy Watson
@marcuswatson49104 жыл бұрын
Lol that guy on the left seems so much cooler then you’d expect😂
@thenicholas77804 жыл бұрын
I find it a little weird that the audience is clapping for the computer.
@helck11533 жыл бұрын
A lot of the audience was the people at IBM that worked on making the computer
@DavidMorseMusic Жыл бұрын
Should try this again with ChatGPT....
@kurokhan2829 күн бұрын
Imagine Watson now. It's been 10 years since this video came out.
@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi37233 жыл бұрын
Ken had wroten down on piece of paper "I for one welcome our new robot/computer overlord!"
@hatersgonnalovethis3 жыл бұрын
classic Simpsons quote
@planck10-435 жыл бұрын
Don't forget Ken Jennings famous words, "I think we saw something important today..."
@patrikneumann2575 Жыл бұрын
How do you think ChatGPT would fare ?
@user-uh4gm8ls8n Жыл бұрын
back because of the progress of chatgpt
@bispybristol3 жыл бұрын
Tom Scott sent me here. 👍
@mav013 жыл бұрын
same
@noahwilliams89968 жыл бұрын
I feel so proud of Watson! :'D And I didn't even have anything to do with him!
@knpstrr5 жыл бұрын
It is an it.
@skittlezbecrazy3 жыл бұрын
When is the Watson vs James Holtzhauer matchup?
@aranchilingar9086 Жыл бұрын
What is a Akashik(phonetic pronunciation [Sanskrit]) record?
@HomoVastans7 жыл бұрын
A:(In the form of a question) What is the T-800?
@luciengrondin5802 Жыл бұрын
"Four letter words for a vantage point or belief. - What is a view?" I like how this first answer shows that Jeopardy is not just about knowledge. Everybody knows what a view is, but it takes a bit more than that to reckognize the definition and quickly come up with the corresponding word.
@kevingreen5793 Жыл бұрын
They need to do this again this time with Jeopardy James! I wonder if Watson will have to go all in to beat James?
@tripfarmer95083 жыл бұрын
Now you know how Garry Kasparov feels lol
@fujimatosa Жыл бұрын
Was it connected to the www during a game?
@hikesystem77212 жыл бұрын
If they game used a signaling device that was equal for all competitors, Ken probably would have won. Watson used direct signaling, while the humans had to go through a mechanical interface. They should have had Watson trigger a "finger" that activated the same device the other contestants used. I believe Watson won only because it had a signaling advantage.
@moatef18862 жыл бұрын
I'm not even sure if this is true, but either way the result wouldn't change at all. I guarantee Watson is capable of reacting much faster than what is humanely possible, it would have buzzed via its "finger" essentially instantaneously (based on some flags in the algorithm, Watson evaluating how close it is to the answer, etc.).
@hikesystem77212 жыл бұрын
@@moatef1886 ok, so it was a signaling competition.
@moatef18862 жыл бұрын
@@hikesystem7721 What are you talking about? I'm disputing your misinformed claim that Watson would have lost if he used a "real signaling device" like the human players. This would not have made any impact, as I described above.
@hikesystem77212 жыл бұрын
@@moatef1886 I understand. I accept your claim that Watson could trigger a mechanical finger faster then Ken. So then, this essentially makes the competition decided on signalling speed. If you removed the signaling from the equation, I believe Ken was superior at reasoning and answering questions. When Watson was asked what city had its largest airport was named after a WWII hero, and its second largest airport named after a WWII battle, it said "Toronto."
@moatef18862 жыл бұрын
@@hikesystem7721 Your premise is correct but your conclusion is strange. Of course Ken could reason better than Watson, because any human can reason better than Watson. Watson doesn't reason. I'm not sure if you understand what about computer science makes Watson impressive at the time he was made
@hikesystem77212 жыл бұрын
How much did IBM have to pay Jeopardy to get them to agree not to have equal, fair signaling systems for all 3 contestants?
@moatef18862 жыл бұрын
I've responded to your comment above; you seem to think that this has any affect whatsoever on the outcome of the game. Like I stated above, Watson can react probably orders of magnitude faster than humans possibly can, provided it makes a decision to buzz in. It would do so perfectly every time without getting penalized, this isn't even remotely difficult compared to Watson actually giving the correct answers.
@Steveman276 ай бұрын
They didn't even mention you here, yet you act like they did. If the whole point of the game was to show that no person had a chance against Watson in a Jeopardy game, then it wasn't a real competition to begin with.
@ThePercyJacksonDude Жыл бұрын
Brad really won $200k for losing. Honestly, not a bad wage for 2 days of playing Jeopardy.
@Espirael4 жыл бұрын
Ken: I am best at getting money James: Hold My Beer
@Devillionaire4 жыл бұрын
Awesome and all... but how're you gonna prevent this from becoming Skynet one day?
@greasyshoe3 жыл бұрын
@@memenistan3438 they dont have to
@albertjackinson3 жыл бұрын
You don't let Watson get taught by somebody who wants that to happen.
@lucariolps2772 жыл бұрын
Watson isn't a aware ai or anything.. It Interprets Text..
@saskoilersfan6 жыл бұрын
The answer is " a raven has caws for thoughts, a writing Desk has cause for thoughts". I forget the question . Anybody know it. It drives me nuts not knowing and its right thurr._.I know its important and i dont know why._.
@davidkopec94423 жыл бұрын
Watson is ready to activate the Terminator Army soon.
@raymondsalazar52912 жыл бұрын
This was eight years ago I can only imagine what Watson is doing now
@aranchilingar90868 ай бұрын
At this moment the difference between the two individuals on the left, and the right of Watson are the neural pathways, and how long it takes for the electricity to reach a certain destination just like a freeway that was obstructed by an accident would have traffic, and would have to reroute in your neural pathways in your brain in your gray matter is the exact same. You can create a direct route by intention You just have to use electric ampacity .
@iLoveChrisSmoove3 жыл бұрын
Did it actually take the questions through Alex's voice or text?
@madnap79722 жыл бұрын
Nah they just sent the text to watson apparently. Voice recognition wasn't good enough, he probably would've lost due to translation errors.
@mackenziewachter25082 жыл бұрын
Well, IMO, IBM Watson's voice sounds very similar to a male Siri. But anyway, after seeing Jeopardy The Greatest of All Time 2 years ago, Ken Jennings was a legend when it comes to answers that are very easy. And even though Ken took place as host of the syndicated series (even though he went on hiatus for "months" after Mattea Roach's winning streak being broken and had Mayim Bialik host for the rest of the season until sometime before the finale), he's still a legendary Jeopardy contestant to this very day.
@luke_ario13137 жыл бұрын
Inb4 people notice that they used music that came from The Smash Brothers Documentary.
@walterfristoe46439 ай бұрын
How did Watson press the buzzer? 🤔
@RashmiPrabhu7 ай бұрын
Technically a team of scientists are playing against actual players
@mariogamefreak15 жыл бұрын
I want ken vs jame vs Watson
@TheJaysOnTop11 ай бұрын
Ken's final answer "I for one welcome our new computer overlords" 😂
@nathan0401_3 жыл бұрын
This is really cool
@oogrooq3 жыл бұрын
What is Toronto?
@CharlesGurr4 ай бұрын
James is so good he replaced AI in the greatest of all time 😂
@jammesdean5 жыл бұрын
James would crush that comp
@5starryansl10 ай бұрын
this was awesome
@toddkrueger15852 жыл бұрын
The question I have is, was Watson self contained, or was it tied to the internet and a search engine?
@lucariolps277 Жыл бұрын
Self contained. Internet would have ultimatley been too slow.
@calebos2683 жыл бұрын
what is toronto?????
@SuperTylerMan113 жыл бұрын
Awesome! Now do this with Jeoporady James
@eclatshwartzbaumcybertune20632 жыл бұрын
I love this show - but i did not know about this - i heard about it in the Simpsons.
@prennt57g995 жыл бұрын
James and ken Vs Watson please
@user-xx5fx6xh6c8 ай бұрын
its amazing!!!!!!!!!
@malavery50172 жыл бұрын
good for him!!!
@BobbyLCollins2 жыл бұрын
At 2:40 look at Ken Jennings' answer.
@akirahirata64863 жыл бұрын
They look like proud dads 👍🏼
@letsgoyankees26363 жыл бұрын
Now IBM Watson gives us fantasy football trade analysis
@gastonforde21213 жыл бұрын
Rip Mr Trebek.
@MaxKoOfficiel Жыл бұрын
The Future is not the future...
@guyvanburen5 жыл бұрын
Unfair comparison due to disparity in I/O bandwidth. Watson can (presumably) read the questions as text with super human speed, and click in with super human reaction time, whereas Ken is delayed in both. So it’s not a fair comparison of human to machine search capability. Deep blue was far more impressive.
@lucariolps277 Жыл бұрын
From how I understood, watson get the question as Text when the announcer read the question out loud. Watson would physically press the Button trough a pneumatic system. It would only press the Button once it was certain of it's answer. So it was pretty close often. There were a lot of Situations where the humans were faster.
@TheSixteen605 жыл бұрын
3:01 why were they tearing down the place
@lflee10 жыл бұрын
What more can Watson do after these 2 years?
@ibmresearch10 жыл бұрын
Hi, you can read the details here, but Watson is helping in diagnosing cancer and helping chef's come up with new recipes. www-03.ibm.com/innovation/us/watson/
@insaneinside908 жыл бұрын
+IBM Research Is he Skynet yet?
@suejak18 жыл бұрын
+IBM Research Wait, IBM Research doesn't know how to use an apostrophe?
@lflee7 жыл бұрын
***** that would be great. I do think the stagnant state of modern material science scene is the bottleneck of our technological progress.
@thesenate55107 жыл бұрын
Watch Terminator, that will give you a good idea of what he'll do.
@ChristopherRubio-zl6tj11 ай бұрын
We need to see James take on Watson
@Cheetah-tz3ut3 жыл бұрын
u go watson
@7prajwal2 жыл бұрын
can someone explain what is going on here?
@Swyzzl4 жыл бұрын
We need a Watson vs James showdown
@phunkyphresh37993 жыл бұрын
If Watson stomped years ago it’ll win every single question this time. Tech has advanced very fast
@triple7marc3 жыл бұрын
Why was this a documentary?
@alessandroperigo67317 жыл бұрын
Jeopardy la no futuro ira ser bem diferente.....anota ai
@BLYFACTOR5 жыл бұрын
I want Ken vs Brad vs watson
@nickprice89073 жыл бұрын
I wonder how James Holzhauer would have done against Watson.
@marksierra35222 жыл бұрын
This took place 9 years ago... The future was here and it's the past now.
@HaroldDipp2 жыл бұрын
Woah 😮😮 you're telling me a computer is better at retaining information than humans
@teddymortensen3 ай бұрын
good thing james wasnt there it would have been over
@arrowghost2 жыл бұрын
Watson isn't the only AI, I remember Deep Blue a lot that beaten Garry Kasparov.
@wazzup2332 жыл бұрын
And AI would take over the world soon against us?!? Seems like a post-apocalyptic sci-fi film that came true and this is what Elon Musk afraid of. 😅
@supersaiyaman115893 жыл бұрын
was it rely fair we are talking about a computer that has every answer in its memory banks, was the point to see hoo could buzz in faster
@lucariolps2772 жыл бұрын
It didn't have everything in it's memeory Bank. It wasn't connected to the internet during jeopardy. It only had limited knowledge. Not to mention, it was also at a disatvantage technically because it first had to understand the Text which gave it like.. A two second Handicap
@killerbowser70465 жыл бұрын
James, ken, and watson please
@jack101starZ2 жыл бұрын
Toronto?????
@justinwilliam65342 жыл бұрын
That machine is the inspiration for the villain Max Kilobyte in Scooby Doo and I don't trust artificial intelligence because some are being made to replace voice actors on the Simpsons and it could destroy the voice acting business for good.
@playsaboutmycat3 ай бұрын
The people, happy, clapping and cheering for Watson who has no emotion lol
@AbnerBrijesh10 ай бұрын
They should do this again with James and Mattea.
@ryansmith10444 ай бұрын
With ChatGPT (or any modern AI) it would not be close. The humans would barely get any right.
@TagSpamCop2 жыл бұрын
My company put in Watson. It never worked right, we pulled it out a few years ago and we wrote our own Siri.
@Cinnimin3 жыл бұрын
watson will spend the 1mil on preserving his ancestors
@jorostuff4 жыл бұрын
This machine (is it?), disconnected from any internet sources, managed to answer questions requiring high level intelligence to even understand.
@jimmysyar8893 жыл бұрын
Yea
@RashmiPrabhu7 ай бұрын
I am here after reading a reference in Dan Brown's Origin