Jean Alesi was once asked which driver impressed him the most, and he said it was Senna. When asked why, he simply said: "Speed".

The best

What a beautiful message!

Beautiful, man. Senna ever! ❤

All of the car's electronic controls are connected to the Senna's brain, making man and machine one.

Senna was faster than him (and probably than everybody else), but to be fair Schumacher didn't have a top tier car between 91-93. He had a good car that could win races in ideal circunstances, but that's it.

And would never had if Ayrton hadn't crashed at Ímola. Senna: 1988, 1990, 1991, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997 World Champion if he was alive.

i see nothing amazing about that. in this period, the best cars were williams and mclarens, so their pilots took pole positions.... The most poles scored Williams drivers ofcourse.... amazing is that Schumacher outqualified his team-mates 16:0 in both 1992 and 1993 season. Also in 1994 he won 14:0... in Q

@@apiFerrari well consider this fact. Schumacher got titles 94 and 95 but there were no other world champion drivers on the grid in those years. Again same for 2001. 2.3.4 no world champions running competitive cars, not his fault but still a fact and relevant.

@@f1master973 possibly but I don't think he would have got 1995. MSC was very strong that year and had Renault engine too.

Perhaps, perhaps not....lets say even if he had lived/survived his crash without any major injuries and could have raced already in Monaco, he would have been already 30 points behind Schumacher in that 1994 season. Ofc if you count that Schumi was Disqulified from 2 races and got ban for Italy and Portugal, Im not saying its impossible that Senna could have been able to catch up but when that was even hard for Hill to do it (who scored alteast 7 points from the first 3 races), I dont know if Senna would have been able to win in 1994. 1995 despite Hill making lot of mistakes, that Benetton was also so often much better car that it would not have been easy. 1996 and 1997 I can fully agree though assuming he would have continued to racing that long. But ye, you can always speculate about these things. Im not saying that 1994-1995 championships would not have been impossible for Senna to win, but they would NOT have come easy. But for sure its entirely possible that Senna would have been the 7 times (or even more) champion and Schumi would have not won that many.

@@Balnazzardi Let's say if he hadn't crashed he would be 10 / 26 in Monaco. In San Marino Senna was going for 1 stop and Schumi for 2, so Ayrton would likely win that race. Plus the Williams was evolving and after Spain the car was pretty good, mostly because of the Renault engine, but with their major aerodinamics flaws diminished to an acceptable extension. Even Hill got a pole on Britain.

@@danieldbdb Ye Im not saying it would have been impossible but assuming he would have crashed in Imola, but survived it, then it especially would not have been easy to catch Schumi, cause neither was it easy for Hill either. But anyhow useless speculation, other than we all know Senna was more than capable of winning more...how much more, we shall never know sadly, but may he rest in piece and I do hope that if there is such thing as heaven/afterlife that he gets to do what he loved for eternity among the other racers who passed away...together with Lauda, Fangio, Gilles Villeneuve and the rest of them. Senna definitely believed, so I would want to believe too.

Some of Senna's friends say, Aryton only wanted to tie Frangio and then move to Ferrari 1996. Maybe in 1999 he would have won once more but he'd needed Schumacher as teammate to get Brawn, Byrne etc. to join and fix the team in the first place so it even became competitive from the disastrous shape it was in the mid 1990's.

Don't say that to a Max Verstappen fan. They all seem to think F1 began with him in 2021. Most of them have never heard of Senna and if they have they all say:"He is old news and irrelevant today." But Senna t-shirts are still seen among F1 fans worldwide. I know. 28 years after Senna's death. Will there be Max Verstappen t-shirts in F1 in 2050?? I think not.

Witwe

Fanzio will give Ayrton very Hard time for sure! @@paulallen8109

parece que ele estava domando um touro furioso....

O carro "passaste do limite,eu vou rodar",Senna"voce fica aqui".

Lol, brilliantly said, sir!

Senna control Senna😂😂

Senna after Aida start to think Tha the Schumacher B194, had still or in part, the TC that is a vantage during the INTERE race, but the FIA analisys, founded in the electronic control unit a program called launch CONTROLL. So, an not allowed program for in crisis and help Michael, only during the start. That was a lot different by the TC and don't help Michael during the race. Also, in the '94, Michael was already considered the fast driver in race, with the free road in front. While Ayrton the undiscussing dominator of the single lap in qualifying. No doubs about it, him was and rest the king of everytime. But I repeat you, not the faster IN RACE, becouse, how many times Alain with the same car beatted Ayrton?. No few times and Michael after 2-3 years of pratizize, was become faster than Alain in race. No one had have succeeded, as happened in Spain '96 under a huge heavy rain, circuit, to increase the gain on the other drivers, around 4 SECONDS per lap. Unfortunaly Ayrton was not there, but there was still Gerard Berger, Mika Hakkinen (both had beat in qualifying, once, Ayrton). However Ayrton was amazing also as personality, while Michael had a more calm and never pole tempre and never polemical.. Senna was a dominator, Michael a quiete guy and man.. Senna want the best car, Michael not, was always positive and sure, about can improved and win wherever him was...

Everyone knows real drivers are faster without TC

@@UnleashthePhury for sure you can't spin innacceleration with the TC, has happened to Ayrton in Brasil '94. But optimized the grip In corners exit, otherwise why in 2002 the FIA decided to allowed the TC, becouse was almost impossible found it in the units engine control, the program. However, one day a press driver and journalist, challange Schumacher on the short Fiorano circuit in the early 2000's. The results was 3 seconds in favore of Michael and proved that a no pro driver (but anyway a good driver), was helped with all the electronics control, on. Michael after this, was not satisfy, switch off all the electronic controls and increase his fast lap, more than one second. The car, if I remind correct, was a Ferrari 430. About the '94 F1 season, I has saw many, many times the B194 in action and saw Michael correct in Imola for example, an understeering in exit by the Tosa, but also in Brazil etc, etc. But the point I my opinion it' s another one. The Benetton B194 was an little masterpiece. 50 horse power less the Renault engine, but a far better as aerodynamic, suspensions, handling and more, add to Schumacher master class, so hard to beat expecially during the initial of the 94's season.

Carlos Alesi Digno não. O melhor de todos os tempos.

infelizmente tinha o shummy pra detonar o senninha kkkkk

orlando zaccrias kk donington em 1993 mostrou isso mesmo

@@orlandozaccrias1875 o Senna em um carro sem controle de tração ainda foi mais rápido que Schumacher em um carro com controle de tração. 3 x 0 no rabo do alemão. Como disse o Schumi " Se perguntar para mim digo que Senna foi o melhor de todos. 94 e 95 era para ele ter sido campeão pois era melhor do que eu .."

@@orlandozaccrias1875 kkk, não fez uma pole em 94 enquanto "senninha" estava vivo. Mesmo tendo controle de tração, que é só acelerar. Ainda quase perdeu pro damon hill.

how was he driving here if he only joined williams in 94 and he was killed in the 3rd race? and japan was one of the last?

@@TheKal31 kk, você não entendeu nada. A volta foi ao limite. Naqueles limites de pista.

@@TheKal31 they had a Pacific GP to give Japan 2 dates that year

0:00

​Because there were 2 japan circuits in The calendar those times: Aida and Suzuka ​@@TheKal31

if there was one pole he wouldnt get,it would be at monaco haha..

+bourlivak88 master of Monaco why wouldn't?

Wrong! As you can see, this pole position was in a very narrow circuit as Aida TI, this circuit is slower and narrower than Hungaroring, so with this pole probably for Senna would no be very difficult to clinch a pole in that year. RIP Senna

Senna.deus.

As of Spain GP 1994, Williams eventually solved the problem with over steering car and suddenly Damon Hill, who was nowhere near Schumacher in the first four races, was able to beat Schumacher. So Senna would have been far ahead of them and only crashes or mechanical problems would have stopped him. It likely would been Senna 10 points or DNF but never anything else in 1994.

Emerson Ribeiro, Mas é verdade eu concordo com VC, e principalmente nenhum na atual temporada da F1 de 2018.

na vdd era as curva de baixa que ele sofria mais... mais ai o carro tava geral uma bosta.. so tinha um bom motor.. o restante senna compensava no braco mesmo.

Com o tempo ficou meio esqecido o fato q ate influenciou na morte de Senna. Esse carro da williams era uma bosta pq a aerodinamica dele ainda era baseada na suspensao ativa da temporada passada, q havia sido banida pela FIA. Entao, quando Senna chega a williams e todos pensavam q iria ser o casamento perfeito e imbativel, na verdade foi uma sentença de morte.

Would've been more akin to watching Schumacher at Ferrari. No way Senna drops a championship from 95-97... and likely wins 94, despite the poor start. Villeneuve and Hill were both able to beat Schumacher once Williams got the 16B sorted. Records would be completely different, F1 fans were robbed.

What if Schumi stayed with his competitive Benetton team instead of wasting 5 years without WDC with Ferrari during mid to late 90s?

If he had lived we wouldn't hear of Schumacher at all ^^

Nah. People back then called rookie Schumacher the next Ayrton Senna.

TheKestevon ...like I said, no way Senna drops a championship from 95-97; regardless of MSC leaving Benetton or not.

no auge com 23 anos e com o melhor Carro . senna genio

kkk

Hauahauahahahaua Schumacher era incomparavel😊

​@@henriqueleonhardt8252sim, no máximo o Schumacher era um Barrichello

E non va dimenticato che la Williams a differenza della macchina truccata di Schumacher era passiva.

Prost was better.

@@MacGovernor lol

@@MacGovernor yes, he was +1,49s by better

@@MacGovernor #SennaSempre

The bennetton was illegal. Piece by piece

Yes the Williams had understeer and oversteer...evident by dragging the rear back onto the track whilst cornering. Clearly the car was still a work in progress. Yet Ayrton still was fastest. Ayrton was an amazing human being..his legacy is Love.

so do i my friend...so do i

​@@stewartwatling4221simple the best

Talvez porque não tinha carro para isto.

@@rafael7706 HUAUEHUAEH Choooooooora HATER!!!!

@@rafael7706 Entra pra ceita !! A ceita que dói menos! HUAEHUAEHUAE

@@rafael7706 o carro de shumacher era melhor q o de Senna em 93 e 94 e mesmo assim o mito Senna fez várias polés nesses dois anos e shumacher não

D'accordissimo 👍

Senna o maior

Na primeira temporada em 92, Schumacher ficou na frente de Senna no campeonato. Em 94, o Alemão tava dando um pau no Senna, mesmo sendo muito novo. Aliás, Senna tava velho e no final de carreira.

​@@walisson219n tem q discutir Senna infinitamente melhor essa discussão encerra por aqui me desculpe mais é vdd

@@walisson219 Senna não estava velho. ele ainda estva no auge da carreira. ainda faltava uns 3 ou 4 anos para ele ,o senna ser considerado velho para a F1...

senna so andava em equipe de ponta kkkk,um bosta

@@orlandozaccrias1875 tá louco?? Se Senna fosse isso que você está insinuando, você não acha que seu companheiro, Prost teria levado todas??? Ambos tinham o mesmo carro!

👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷

@@orlandozaccrias1875 que cara idiota kkk babaca do caralho se não sabe oq fala não fala o imbecil

Ascari and Clark were better than Fangio. Senna and Clark were on the same level.

Not the best, just the fastest.

No, not even close. He was just popular.

@channel closed I'm not saying Senna was the best? Just the fastest over a lap...

The Best 🇧🇷

@@Yoshik379 that makes him the best

Senna tava com direção assistiva, dispositivo ilegal, que facilitou na qualificação. Mas, na largada Schumacher esperou a hora certa pra faturar mais uma.

Now 30.

Hmmmmm, verdade!

Fw16 é um carro horrível em estabilidade e era rápido a famosa cadeira elétrica

Esse carro foi o erro da williams

cheat car

Verdade, enquanto a Williams pula violentamente no asfalto, a Benetton passou lisa...

beautiful words

@@Sky2288 thank you.

Man, what a refreshing post, congrats for your consciousness! That's the most true statement I've ever read here on YT.

Gerhard Berger tested the chassis Schumi won two titles with in 96' when he went to Benetton and he said it was undrivable. Benetton was far from a perfect racing car

@@srxt6758 we all know that story, but gerard never drove the williams of the first races of 94... He would've said the same if not worst

Newey designed the Williams around the driver aids unlike other designers who used the driver aids as addons, that's what made the Williams unbeatable for a number of years. To level the playing field the F1 authorities decided to ban these aids which left behind a very dangerous machine in the FW16 which were only resolved mid season 1994.

Carro pior kkkk, não sei como pode carro pior e virar os mesmos tempos, a Williams foi sempre mais rápida que a benetton principalmente em voltas lançadas.

@@rafael7706 VÁ ESTUDAR, bobão! Em 1993 Damon Hill era mais rápido que Schumacher! Em 1994 Damon Hill estava *mais lento* que Schumacher e mais lento que *ele mesmo* em 1993!! Já o Schumacher estava *VOANDO* em 1994, 1.5s a 2s *mais rápido do que ELE MESMO* em 1993!!! VÁ ESTUDAR, TROUX@!

@@rafael7706 Verdade Rafael concordo Plenamente claro que a Willians era Mais rapido Isso Não Tenho duvida o Schumacher apenas aproveito a Falha da Willians naquele momento kkkkk

@@youturbo2478 o carro era pior na estabilidade em comparação com o Benetton pelo controlo de estabilidade,sem duvida,mas a nivel de capacidade de motor o Williams era um excelente carro.

@@miguelpereira1262 Miguel, não era um excelente carro, não se pode confundir. Era muito rápido devido ao motor Renault, porém como um foguete desgovernado - incontrolável. Adrian Newey e Patrick Head admitiram que o carro era um desastre “Adrian Newey said “To be honest we made a bloody awful cock-up. The 1994 car *was not a good car at all* . It was very difficult to drive. We developed the aerodynamics using active suspension and we developed them [to work] in a very small window. Having had active suspension for two years, when we then lost it we had more trouble re-adapting to passive suspension than other people”.

lol

I was searching for this comment lol

verdade, Senna era fantástico nas saídas de curva, Schumacher nas entradas!

Na entrada tambem,ninguem freava tao dentro de uma curva como o Senna.

E olha que estava em carro sem controle de tração enquanto o Schumi estava.... O Senna na ficção era uma espécie de Anakin Skywalker ....

@@lucianoozorio7763 schumi?????? Kkkkkkkkk vc dava o r.. p ele???? Qta intimidade bixo

Imagina se essa Wiliams tivesse prestando. O que Senna faria não tinha pra ninguém. Uma pena acabaram com carro justo na sua vez.

Isso mesmo Paulo. Ímola foi a terceira corrida, onde ele morreu. A primeira foi no Brasil, a segunda foi essa aí, no pacífico . O Senna marcou a pole nas três. No Brasil, estava liderando e perdeu a posição nos boxes, por causa da vazão maior da bomba de abastecimento da Benneton, que estava fora do regulamento, mas estava tirando um segundo por volta do Schumacher quando rodou e não conseguiu voltar porque o carro apoiou na zebra e as rodas giraram em falso. Nesta corrida, o o Mika Hakinnen bateu nele na largada e tirou ele da corrida. Em ímola, morreu.

Rafael Oda should we go to the wins, podiums, titles, fastest laps, hat tricks percentage?? Pole positions are irrelevant as it only shows who has the fastest car, look at Hamilton. Senna could never beat Schumacher on the same car, nor win a championship, Schumacher showed him that. Williams had 80 HP more than a Bennetton.

80HP is only one of the enginge parameters and is important mainly on higher speeds , meanwhile schumacher had Traction Control, Launch Control and rigged fuel system.... And if you talk about the same car "issue" take a look at 1992 when goddamn Martin Brundle was beating MSC in races..... And he happened to be only one strong team partner and only one that was allowed to fight him. Senna fought with Prost and proved his worth, while Schumacher was always afraid of inside team competition.

Eddu13 are you dumb? please watch 1993 season that year Benetton had 80hp more then mclaren. see Brasil race 1993 for example...stupid fuck

@@Eddu13 you dumb fuck!

Skandre don't answer to this un(Eddu)cated. His mind is of a 13 years old child.

o unico que me lembra o Senna é o MAX

Ctz ele foi assassinado ,assim como muitos outros em seus melhores momentos da vida,ele denunciou várias vezes o sistema truculento e sujo da F1 assim como Romário em 1998 o cara do nada foi cortado ,e o Ronaldo já sempre do sistema se vendeu 1998 com uma falsa convulsão

Giuliano o carro melhorou também até o final da temporada, até o Hill deu trabalho e olha que era um piloto mediocre.

Shumacher. Só ganhou porque jogou o carro para cima do Bill. Com Senna já era campeão antes o carro todo tirava a pole.

Driving style yes! He would have had more WDC if it wasn’t for Imola.

​@@aaron-damonkassner4715Agreed. If he stayed at Williams he would probably have been champion in '94,' 95, '96 and '97.