A great no-nonsense comparison, thank you, this was very helpful.

I´ve done that kind of double exposures on purpose a few times while making longer exposures, just because I wanted more surreal cloudscapes. It worked out really well. Oh, and by the way if you want to keep the tripod from sinking on wet and sandy grounds just put 3 old CDs under the tripod legs.

Great video. Very informative. Foma-pan did very well. Delta has always been great. Thanks.

Thanks for this Will, just got a Vermeer 4x5 and was weighing up the very options of both these films, thank you for showing the comparison, great vlog.

Proper photography information. Thanks Will 👍🏾

The observations you make on the differences are very helpful. Thanks.

my subjective opinion based on hundreds of filmdevelopments in the last 30 years... EVERY film has his favorit developer... try the delta 100 in xtol and you will found nothing to compare... it´s a little bit like the legendary tri X in HC-110... But I think in Pinholephotography you have no reason to found perfection... I love the Foma Retropan 320 in rodinal

I have been thinking of trying out pinhole photography for a while. Watching your channel has made me pull the trigger. Ordered a pinhole for my intrepid and pulled the trigger on a 6x17 pinhole as well. Looking forward to trying it out. Thanks for the great content.

What a great experiment!Shots are awesome!! Cheers Will :-)

less difference than I would have expected, nice work

Love the Film comparison video series I’ll have to search for a side by side with Acros 100

Another great video 😊. I shoot exclusively with Fomapan solely due to cost. But I find it to be a decent film.

damn good shots man!

The Ilford is nice for sure! But often enough, I find myself "just trying something out", and the Foma more than adequate for that. 90 cents for a 4x5 sheet of the Foma over here, 2.3 buckst for the Ilford. Price factor of 2.5 makes a difference, at least for me. ^^

HP5+ works really well in 4x5 and will shorten the exposure in low light conditions even more.

Good comparison. The reciprocity failure of the Foma makes it a non-starter for me in pinhole work. Time spent in the field is too valuable!

Fab images Will - love the tree root (no surprise there!). The differences between the two films is negligible to my eyes, although in a print it may perhaps be a different matter? I was think thinking about trying some Fomapan 100 as it seems popular amongst pinholers, the cost no doubt being a major factor, but for me the longer exposure time is a characteristic that puts me off. I am currently trying out Kodak Tmax 100 in my Ondu - in comparison to Delta 100. I want to like the former (I dont know why?!) but on cost Delta wins.

Just got some Fomapan 400 for my, not yet made, pinhole camera. I like their 35mm stuff so have high hopes for some good results.

Gôd work sir keep up

16:35