Topez AI does its own thing. But yes, if they added an ai enhancer/upscaler to their Topez AI software, that would be awesome. I wish they would add a colorizer for old photos while they're at it.

@@CoolhandLukeSkywalkr yeah these ai upscalers are not really upscalers in a sense. idk what you'd call them but yeah topaz is doing something different. topaz does leave me wanting for a lot of stuff though, it would be cool if 'hallucinating' was an option there. it seems to me that adding skin detail while retaining likeness shouldnt be that difficult of a thing but im probably wrong

@@spacekitt.n The problem is that both Krea ai and magnific ai are still both too cartoonie and not photorealistic, especially in the faces of people. They have their use cases, but they need a lot of improvement for photorealistic images and actual photos. I'm not trying to turn my photorealistic art into a cartoon. If they can come out with an enhancer /upscaler that doesn't ever ruin faces, I would be very grateful.

@@spacekitt.n Topez is super useful, but if you need to repair pixelated faces with blurry eyes, it won't do that by itself. myheritage or remini enhance will be necessary, as well as upscaling and face repair in Topez. So, it's a matter of finding the correct tool for the specific job at hand.

@@spacekitt.n Krea and Magnific are enhancing upscalers as opposed to just typical upscaling that doesn't add "enhancement"

The original Midjourney prompt was simply fantasy map illustration, but it took a couple of generations until I got the right style.

I was moving the layer mask, which I unlinked from the layer. I also added a thin Stroke layer style for the white division line.

@@YesImaDesigner make a tutorial 🤪

I remember they were running a test day recently when you could get some free credits to try Magnific. Hopefully they will introduce that as a permanent feature. Until then you need to pay the monthly subscription fee to try it out. I will try to reach out to the creators to see if they can share some free credits with our viewers.

@@YesImaDesigner ok thanks so much

I paid for it and hesitated at first. It is worth it if you use it professionally. It is really good. But soon, there will be other similar features build into services that you might already use. I paid for a month. A month is a lot in the AI world at the time being.

​@@andyrevo8081glad you are finding it useful. The gen-AI field is improving and changing rapidly and it is hard to predict what we will find useful in a week or two, but for now I definitely feel like Magnific is amongst the most ufeful AI tools I tested.

good idea, I've seen a few amazing similar models with the code open sourced soon.@@andyrevo8081

no, it costs now. I also wish we could at least try 2-3 images before paying so much

They will be able to play...how is that, please ? Because I love maps and seeing this video with the possibilities is just crazy 😍

​@@snake135What I do is I let GPT explain what it sees in the map in huge detail without having to constantly analyze the image. Then as the kids talk with GPT, it keeps track of "where" they are and what they do. I will release this as custom GPT soon-ish™(1-2months), you can follow me on twitter for when I announce it @vitezslavferko ;)

No, we want this technology to continue to keep improving. Krea ai and magnific ai are doing something brand new. Nobody else has even tried this ai enhancer/upscaling. Absolutely amazing technology.

@@CoolhandLukeSkywalkr nobody else has tried it because it’s useless to the general public and professionals lmao what good is a picture that has been altered beyond recognition? The only people interested in this are AI tech bros.

@@klerb342 I already use krea ai to restore old photos as part of my workflow, where I update Black and white photos from the 30s and 40s and old color photos and I make them look like it's 2023. Anybody who has played around on krea with a bunch of different types of photos and styles of art realize the value of this technology.

@@klerb342 I use sdxl and 3 other image ai art generators. Then I run that art into krea. Then I remaster it in Topez AI and photoshop.

@@klerb342 One example. I make art of James Dean. I have an ai art generation with a James Dean prompt, and it got me close. But then krea Ai totally fixed the half assed version of James Dean I had and put a super realistic much closer version of James Dean in the picture instead. With Taylor Swift, it's even crazier. A blurry sdxl image of Taylor Swift that absolutely didn't come out correctly at all was tested by me in krea Ai, and it came back with phenomenal Taylor Swift art that looked exactly like her. I make celebrity art. This feature is super helpful for me. Unfortunately, it didn't work with Macaulay Culkinuly home alone art. But it worked with multiple celebrities I've tried so far. Also, magnific is sharper and, in some ways, more technologically advanced, but I feel like it's overly sharpened in its outputs. Also, it makes everything look painted, for the most part. Krea and magnific are the only two true ai enhancer engines so far an I much prefer the look of krea images for the most part. Sometimes magnific is the clear better. It depends on which picture. My favorite thing I can do with the enhancers is upgrade old Black and White and color photos. I am planning on training sdxl loras soon, I'm using krea to do restoration work on the old photo after I colorize them in hitpaw. In the best case scenarios, I get photos that look 2024. I get 25 of those, I can train an sdxl lora of a golden age actress like Marilyn Monroe and Paulette Goddard and Donna Reed who I am working on for my first sdxl loras, once the restoration work is complete. I train sdxl loras on a third party website so that I can improve my versions and see if I'm ready to actually get the sdxl loras trained for real. These are amazing use cases. I hope we see two or three more AI enhancers like this before 2025.

Anti Upscaling now? Thats a new stance

Nothing wrong with promoting staff, every artist needs income.

Yup, the software does all the work and they call themselves artists. There will be a billion pieces done per day now.

No, it's not. I wasn't sponsored, I would have mentioned it in the video.