IMPROVED Is The US 7th Fleet Vulnerable To Chinese Strike Near Taiwan? (WarGames 72B) | DCS

  Рет қаралды 122,155

Grim Reapers

Grim Reapers

Күн бұрын

Original 7th Fleet Video: • Is The US 7th Fleet Vu...
*SORRY for the audio POPS in the video. I am trying a new mic and haven't got a pop shield for it yet.
GRIM REAPERS 2 (KZfaq): / @grimreapers2
PATREON: / grimreapers
Mods: • Free DCS Mods
Researcher: / @combatineffective
0:00 Intro
0:41 Addressing Viewer Comments
8:08 Testing AIM-120D vs PL-15
12:45 Battle Details
21:39 Predictions
23:10 FIGHT!
46:36 Tacview Review
USEFUL LINKS
GRIM REAPERS (KZfaq): / @grimreapers
GRIM REAPERS 2 (KZfaq): / @grimreapers2
GR PODCASTS: anchor.fm/grim-reapers
DCS TUTORIALS: / @grimreapers
DCS BUYERS GUIDE: • DCS World Module Quick...
DONATE/SUPPORT GRIM REAPERS
MERCHANDISE: www.redbubble.com/people/grme...
PATREON monthly donations: / grimreapers
PAYPAL one-off donations: www.paypal.me/GrimReapersDona...
SOCIAL MEDIA
WEBSITE: grimreapers.net/
STREAM(Cap): / grimreaperscap
FACEBOOK: / grimreapersgroup
TWITTER: / grimreapers_
DISCORD(DCS & IL-2): / discord (16+ age limit)
DISCORD(TFA Arma): discordapp.com/invite/MSYJxbM (16+ age limit)
OTHER
CAP'S X-56 HOTAS MAPS: drive.google.com/open?id=1g7o...
CAP'S WINWING HOTAS MAPS: drive.google.com/drive/folder...
THANK YOU TO: Mission Makers, Admin, Staff, Helpers, Donators & Viewers(without which, this could not happen) xx
#GRWarGames #WarGames #7thFleet #China #Taiwan #USN #AIM120D #PL15 #GR #DCSWorld #Aviation #AviationGaming #FlightSimulators #Military

Пікірлер: 730
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
Original 7th Fleet Video: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f6eierBh0p-qoJ8.html *SORRY for the audio POPS in the video. I am trying a new mic and haven't got a pop shield for it yet.
@jimkluska253
@jimkluska253 Жыл бұрын
Awesome once again!!! I'd love to see some f22s from Okinawa getting in this ....yes there would need to be a air refueling
@Mystical922
@Mystical922 Жыл бұрын
AIM-260 fully replaced production will be 2026 it should be deployed later this year the USAF says the program is finishing testing
@Anarchy_420
@Anarchy_420 Жыл бұрын
18:44 lol yeah but can they carry The YJ-12's like The J-16?? Would love to see a few "J-15/16" with YJ-12's in similar scenario ;) 22:58 Lmfao😂🤣 Just have some air-air nukes standing by!😆👍 36:23 That's fair I suppose. Lol even tho I believe its *Closer to 120 miles or 193 kilometers.😁✌ 2:43 & 46:51 Perhaps have them attack from different directions and in couple smaller waves as well, I mean that's Two Reasons to try🤔👍
@jimkluska253
@jimkluska253 Жыл бұрын
No worries cap, vid enough to compensate
@jimkluska253
@jimkluska253 Жыл бұрын
@@Mystical922 wow, what jets will carry these? Are these the next gen aims? Thanks for the info!
@williamknows3908
@williamknows3908 Жыл бұрын
The thing that makes this channel so special imo is how Cap deals with recommendations, how he actually reads the comments interacts with his community and improve after every single video.👍
@nathaniellazo5912
@nathaniellazo5912 Жыл бұрын
I know right! He is one of the most active people in the comments, he even said he would try my recommendation for a fleet scenario about a week ago. A 2v2 of past and future carrier groups against each other.
@chrisinstasis7986
@chrisinstasis7986 Жыл бұрын
This is a most excellent observation. One of the best yootoob comments I've read for a while. And very accurate. I do get the impression that "valued humans" is meant and not just a nice sounding catchphrase. Edit: I say that as someone who personally only ever uses a phrase like "valued humans" in a deeply sarcastic tone of voice.
@chrisinstasis7986
@chrisinstasis7986 Жыл бұрын
In fairness, it is somewhat symbiotic, because a lot of the suggestions are good!
@TheWeatherbuff
@TheWeatherbuff Жыл бұрын
It's always nice when the Commanding Officer listens to input from the troops. CAP does a fantastic job. I'm just starting in DCS and this channel is a gold mine.
@bobmacvittie9606
@bobmacvittie9606 Жыл бұрын
I think this is his full time job making vedios for us so grateful
@timkirchoff3869
@timkirchoff3869 Жыл бұрын
I think having the F-35s with murder load was the difference in the bombers not making it to firing range. Last time the F-35s quickly ran out of missiles before they were able to take everything out. We had to wait for the land launched planes coming from Japan to finish off the bombers.
@nuba16can
@nuba16can Жыл бұрын
I totally agree. The beast mode/murder hornet combination literally has dozens of more missiles in the air at one time compared to the last video.
@parvizdeamer
@parvizdeamer Жыл бұрын
Yeah that was the difference, they were also able to get up really quickly as well
@IRONIC1688
@IRONIC1688 Жыл бұрын
Agreed.
@lelandclawson1
@lelandclawson1 Жыл бұрын
Started typing the same thing in a comment then thought I’d better scroll down I’m sure many noticed the same thing lol
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
Yes fair point. Well spotted.
@googacct
@googacct Жыл бұрын
At this point we have seen two foiled attempts at attacking the7th fleet. It would be interesting to see how a retaliatory strike against Chinese military targets would fare.
@misha791
@misha791 Жыл бұрын
Package will be delivered to Hainan naval base once it starts. Pacific will go Defcon all the way from San Dog to Alaska.
@bestestusername
@bestestusername Жыл бұрын
Yanks wont hit military, they will hit power, water, dams, big bridges, all the infastructure that hurts a country.
@jimkluska253
@jimkluska253 Жыл бұрын
There ya go!!! Awesome idesa
@kiro9257
@kiro9257 Жыл бұрын
In a real life scenario, the US and her allies could use all of its cargo fleet and heavy bombers to deliver cruise missiles, MALDs, and other stand-off weapons which can easily saturate Chinese SAMs without being sacrificed. Although seeing another scenario in DCS would be very interesting.
@TimmyTheTimeTraveler
@TimmyTheTimeTraveler Жыл бұрын
@@misha791 San Dog?
@DavidWilliams-ig5ec
@DavidWilliams-ig5ec Жыл бұрын
Cap, until DCS gets functional subs in game, the results will always be way off reality. Regardless, I'm not even a DCS player, but I love watching your scenarios play out. Kudos to your human pilots as well.
@92HazelMocha
@92HazelMocha Жыл бұрын
Same for shore defenses, best dcs has is 1970's short range ASM's. If even Ukraine can sink a missile destroyer with a single battery, any country with a sizable military would definitely have the capability to defend agaisnt a battle group nearing their shore.
@Barnes6083
@Barnes6083 Жыл бұрын
@@92HazelMocha Yeah I wish our ASM's were more up-to-date. To speak on Ukraine, Ukraine has also been effectively trained at conducting asymmetrical warfare to fight against a much larger foe like Russia. It's not a sizeable military that makes a difference, its a well trained one. Russia had/has a sizeable military and they're a laughing stock rn.
@92HazelMocha
@92HazelMocha Жыл бұрын
@@Barnes6083 I just meant that Ukraine has never been known for its naval/anti-ship capabilities and has always been a smaller military. So if they're capable of sinking the Moskva with what they had on hand after Russia had already invaded, it stands to reason that countries with much larger and more sophisticated militaries would have far more capacity to do so, quality of soldiers and leadership not withstanding.
@jimkluska253
@jimkluska253 Жыл бұрын
Get dcs, it's really cool
@MGZetta
@MGZetta Жыл бұрын
@@Barnes6083 Last time I checked Ukraine was the one crying for some more money and military. Lol. And when was the last time Ukraine actually take back some land? Whatever that asymmetrical warfare is it ain't keeping their casualty low nor keeping their ground. So, I guess laughing at Russia is some kind of self therapy for yall. Lmao. All the "successful" destruction of Russian ammo dump and bridges yet the one keep "strategically" falling back is Ukraine, kinda weird. But ok. Keep "winning" Lol. Soon, you gonna encircle Moscow with that "asymmetrical" warfare shit. Lmao.
@Zen-lf7zr
@Zen-lf7zr Жыл бұрын
Chinese missiles running out of batteries before hitting is probably the funniest thing I've seen on this channel (might be the most realistic too :P)
@georgegu3374
@georgegu3374 Жыл бұрын
anti-carrier missiles are hypersonic ballistic glider, and it doesn't run on batteries. cheers
@Zen-lf7zr
@Zen-lf7zr Жыл бұрын
@@georgegu3374 If it has a guidance computer then it has batteries. Otherwise the carrier can just move out of the way or the missile just gets intercepted if it can't maneuver.
@slslbbn4096
@slslbbn4096 Жыл бұрын
The Chinese unfortunately are world leaders in manufacturing batteries. Reality is that many Americans are anticipated to die in any conflict with China over Taiwan. And this was based on old RAND corp analysis 6 years ago which predict US defeat in a Taiwan war scenario and stalemate in South China Sea scenario. The advent of newer and better Chinese weapons, missiles, stealth fighters and drones/ mass produced hypersonic missiles render this balance even more in favor of China. What isn't published to the American public is the fact that the Chinese will use initially biochemical and then later nuclear weapons on American cities- particularly NYC, SF, San Diego, Honolulu/Pearl Harbor etc. It is for this reason Japan is likely to also stay strictly neutral. The university students in China noted the inability of the US to deal with COVID and have many ideas regarding further weaponization of real biological weapons/viruses to decimate the American population. The recent sale of weapons to Taiwan have in fact galvanized some to start offering technology, tactics and materiel for staging biochemical strikes on US soil for foreign extremists. Tactics like dispersible aerosolizable bioweapons to be released at domestic airport waiting areas to maximize spread to multiple US cities and states, while ensuring adequate latency period to minimize detection and population death. This is terrible news for Humanity and utterly preventable if we had respected each other's borders: China respecting the US annexation of their breakaway separatist Confederate States of America, while the US respects China's breakaway Republic of China (what we call Taiwan)
@Zen-lf7zr
@Zen-lf7zr Жыл бұрын
@@slslbbn4096 ok bot. China itself is still in lockdown after almost 3 years of Covid due to incompetent policies, so I'd say the whole world handled it better than China. Their military is good at barking but nothing else. Their battery tech is hardly the best, their engines haven't even reached Russian levels of performance let alone America's PW engines used in 5th gen planes. And bio/chem weapons is a two way street, the hypersonics China has won't make any difference because their range isn't intercontinental. At any given time US has more carriers than China has ever even seen in it's lifetime. It's funny to imagine anyone would think China would win in that situation. Their J-20 "stealth" is another joke they've tried to pass on as comparable to American tech, in an all out war the F-15/F-35 combo will do far more damage than J-20/J-11s with their inferior radar. Just because China claims capabilities on paper doesn't make it true. Hardly any country buys their military equipment and that says a lot about it.
@georgegu3374
@georgegu3374 Жыл бұрын
@@Zen-lf7zr high capacity batteries are designated for power batteries on like ev cars. computers on missiles are low energy mcus, power consumption is almost negligible. and guess where are the largest power battery manufacturers?
@jamesbrooks1388
@jamesbrooks1388 Жыл бұрын
It always seems at least one human can't seem to follow instructions. Turn back before you get in range and go west... continues into area after a specific reminder, then goes North. AI is not the only one that can't figure it out.
@Kevin-hb7yq
@Kevin-hb7yq Жыл бұрын
Grim Reapers after all yo!
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
lol yup
@Novgorod_Republic
@Novgorod_Republic Жыл бұрын
Yeah all those PL-15s just being launched at 2 planes and most of them missing them and other targets just ruined it all.
@machinagamer
@machinagamer Жыл бұрын
Hey guys love these videos keep them up! A couple of quick things: the only Marine Corps Aviation assets that are permanently stationed on Okinawa are two Osprey squadrons (262 and 265) so there are no JSF's stationed there. The two VMFA squadrons in Japan (121 and 242) are stationed up in Iwakuni so they could be on an LHA/LHD if it was sailing with the fleet. The 40 JSF's you have at Kadena need to be switched to F-15's from the two Air Force squadrons (44 and 67) that are stationed there. Doesn't seem like they would make that much difference though as by the time they get to the fight it would be over, but hey you never know. Last thing, the make up of the Carrier Air Wing is too big. I know you addressed the lack of Growlers which is due to the limitations of the game itself, but the fighters aboard a carrier are usually only 4 squadrons worth. Obviously that can be easily changed and if they were purposely going to Taiwan in an act of defiance they could certainly make the decision to carry more fighters. These realistic simulation videos are awesome keep it up!
@superflyguy4488
@superflyguy4488 Жыл бұрын
Its a game
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
JSF stationed on Okinawa, please see this for prevenance: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/sJqbpc-lyNmycas.html
@jaredbreytenbach7416
@jaredbreytenbach7416 Жыл бұрын
Hello hope you guys are having a great day
@JeZuZProtegae
@JeZuZProtegae Жыл бұрын
Love these relatively realistic scenarios hope you keep them coming
@SameBasicRiff
@SameBasicRiff Жыл бұрын
Highly agree! I love seeing semi actual good simulation of these things at a non-governmental level that is actually so top quality gov's might be watching too haha
@justinhubiak7441
@justinhubiak7441 Жыл бұрын
Cap this was great..can't wait to see you redo some more of the old carrier battles with the new tech. Thank you.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
things will be soooo different!
@ryansoto7093
@ryansoto7093 Жыл бұрын
I F@!&ing LOVE the Grim Reapers!!!! 🙌🏻
@StephenButkay
@StephenButkay Жыл бұрын
Can we just appreciate that a video of a sim game had the soul of a historical WW2 pacific style war story fight? The two F-18's in the beginning basically giving the rest of the squadrons a fighting chance, the Chinese tech coming up short on the initial attack. This battle has a better plot than anything Hollywood gives us.
@madmike5621
@madmike5621 Жыл бұрын
I had the biggest grin on my face when Cap said "Lets run the fight again even bigger and better" then I reached for the popcorn! 👍
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
lols
@mhk211071
@mhk211071 Жыл бұрын
The biggest thing here is the PL15s just not being able to get kills on the F18s. Check the number of bailed out pilots from the 36th minute or so of the video and you'll see that either the 18s are superhuman in their notching or (more likely) the PL15 needs a bit of work.
@dennizkucuk835
@dennizkucuk835 Жыл бұрын
The PL15 is 100% not modelled correctly. As much as I love these videos, I fkn despise how cap just uses "Well that happened" as an excuse for it being final. If those missile were actually modelled correctly, a lot more plane would be dead. Then again, I can't predict the overall battle, but those missiles might as well be R27r missiles with how shitty they were.
@vector8877
@vector8877 Жыл бұрын
@@dennizkucuk835 If the PL 15 was actually modelled correctly in DCS, you'd end up with actually fewer hits since in real life it may have the range, but it's an extremely heavy and large missile, and so you'd see fighters very easily outmanoeuvering them. In real life many experts believe that the missile is specifically built to counter AWACs and large aircraft like refuellers, not at all effective against fighter sized aircraft.
@dennizkucuk835
@dennizkucuk835 Жыл бұрын
@@vector8877 very good point, and it's probably true. Still, the lack of battery is a major issue with the one in game currently.
@liuziyue462
@liuziyue462 Жыл бұрын
@@vector8877 You mean the PL21 perhaps? PL15 is built to replace the PL12, they have almost the same size and weight. The PL21 is built to counter AWACS and tankers which is really heavy and huge.
@haruyanto8085
@haruyanto8085 Жыл бұрын
​@@vector8877 PL-21 is what you're thinking of, theyre designed to take out high value targets. PL-15s are made for air to air.
@mateen6849
@mateen6849 Жыл бұрын
I love ur videos but I’ve noticed ALOT of bias as expected, but I would honestly appreciate a real and fair fight. The pl-15 is a newer and better missile with a longer range than the aim-120D. Infact america is makin the aim-260 cause of china’s pl-15. I’ll love a redo with a pl-15 buff. Average numbers from wikipedia (I KNOW WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A RELIABLE SOURCE) state that the pl-15 range is 155miles; while the aim-120D range is 96 miles. I suggest watching covert cables video on why america is laking in the long range missile category. But nice video tho !
@kalactose348
@kalactose348 Жыл бұрын
Plus how can the missiles be running out of battery as portrayed. Also if you are attacking won't you consider have way more aircrafts than the enemy? Defo biased
@vector8877
@vector8877 Жыл бұрын
The PL 15 likely is not a better missile than the AIM 120D. It's believed by many experts to be dedicated to anti AWACs and transports missions like other missiles such as the R37. The PL 15 is heavy and quite long, and so unlikely to be able to make the sharp manoeuvres required to hit smaller fighter sized aircraft, while the AIM 120D is much more suited to this.
@kalactose348
@kalactose348 Жыл бұрын
@@vector8877 we agree but then why does it run out of battery and by the way the pl 15 has way more range than the aim120d that is literally thee reason the us is developing aim 260jatm just to counter the pl 15
@vector8877
@vector8877 Жыл бұрын
@@kalactose348 For the Battery issue many of the PL 15s were fired outside their max range. Some at 115 nautical miles and etc, which is very much the pilots problem and not the games. If you remember last time the old AIM 120Ds were also running out of battery when fired outside 100nm, however firing under would prevent that. Soo from this you can probably conclude there's no bias, it's literally happened to American missiles in the past too. And I agree with you that the PL 15 has more claimed range than the AIM 120D due to the dual pulse motor and other factors. However that range only really counts against AWACs and large aircraft, since the PL 15 is designed to shoot them down, and is too large to effectively manoeuvre to shoot down fighter sized aircraft and so would be useless. The Amraam is still superior to shoot down fighters compared to the PL 15, and the PL is better at shooting down large aircraft. The AIM 260 JATM is likely being created to shoot down Chinese jets before they can fire their PL 15s on American AWACs and large platforms. That is one real threat the PL 15 presents, however I'm pretty sure it's non existent against fighters
@matthewhull5876
@matthewhull5876 Жыл бұрын
This was a great sim. You made it as fair as possible and let the dice roll. Well done!
@mrlodwick
@mrlodwick Жыл бұрын
Awesome! never seen so many missiles. That was a total fest of entertainment thank you all.
@73jbirch
@73jbirch Жыл бұрын
Found you guys a couple weeks ago and I am loving it!!!!!
@AyoDusk
@AyoDusk Жыл бұрын
really appreciate how much effort you put into your videos. the fact that u read the comments and made a whole new video just for the comments as well is just insane. keep up the hard work fella!
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
thx
@AyoDusk
@AyoDusk Жыл бұрын
@@grimreapers ❤️
@Silo-Ren
@Silo-Ren Жыл бұрын
@44:59 Cap's evil laught😄 "That's muh boi's, that's muh boi's."
@jmtpolitico80
@jmtpolitico80 Жыл бұрын
This was surely one of the most amazing videos! I could almost imagine sitting in one of those jets looking at all those missiles, jets, and all the madness.... Great video! 3rd time watching this video!
@thomaszhang3101
@thomaszhang3101 Жыл бұрын
I’m a little irritated how the AIM-120D had similar performance to the PL-15 in DCS, as the PL-15 is supposed to have be dual pulsed and have a longer no escape zone.
@MGZetta
@MGZetta Жыл бұрын
That would be buff for China, and this channel can't have China win whatsoever. Personally don't care who wins as this channel probably has like 80% of the US winrate but I want a close fight to watch and this was just one-way slaughter. Lmao.
@hughmungus2760
@hughmungus2760 Жыл бұрын
@@MGZetta previously in naval engagements china tended to win alot because US fleets were just garbage at ship to ship fighting and it always ended in a CWIS gun fight.
@MGZetta
@MGZetta Жыл бұрын
@@hughmungus2760 interesting, haven't witnessed those vids.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
I don't want to start messing with PL-15 as it's not my missile but I'll pass on your complaint.
@thomaszhang3101
@thomaszhang3101 Жыл бұрын
@@grimreapers thank you, also can you please request optional anime decal on Japanese F-35A UwU?
@trig
@trig Жыл бұрын
When the F35's have fired their weapons from the pylons can they dump the pylons and become fully stealthy? It would be a great tactical advantage as they can continue to advance, whilst the foe avoids the incoming, and fire their internal missiles at a much closer range at higher value targets.
@Kevin-hb7yq
@Kevin-hb7yq Жыл бұрын
I'd have thought this was a thing that stealth would be built for, same with extra fuel bags. Some other comments are saying this doesn't work for real because reasons.
@forzaelite1248
@forzaelite1248 Жыл бұрын
@@Kevin-hb7yq The F22 is capable of doing so and I imagine the F35 can be made to, but they don't because pylons cost money; in an active wartime situation they'll probably be set up to.
@HauntedXXXPancake
@HauntedXXXPancake Жыл бұрын
I would imagine that for maximum stealth, the Pylon-mountings in the wings need to get plugged or covered on the ground. But some relatively small openings in the skin after dumping the Pylons would probably still be much better than driving those big ol' vertical panels through enemy radar.
@yzdatabase4175
@yzdatabase4175 Жыл бұрын
F22 and F35 can jettison pylons.
@smarty_7997
@smarty_7997 Жыл бұрын
@@yzdatabase4175 the f-35 definitely can’t jettison pylons. They’re bolted up with 3 massive bolts.
@jonathantoymaker
@jonathantoymaker Жыл бұрын
The only realism in this battle is the wave of Pl-15's...
@Bradygoat6390
@Bradygoat6390 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for all the hard work you and the boys and lady do. Cap cares about his " valued viewers " and reads the comments. He gets me everytime with the " sip of tea " lol. Love the Brits and sending love from USA
@boccelounge
@boccelounge Жыл бұрын
Best Fight Ever. GR continues to out-do itself. Thanks and cheers to Cap and all the Boys!
@brothazoot
@brothazoot Жыл бұрын
"Anything else?" "Murica"
@tom23rd
@tom23rd Жыл бұрын
"that's the price you gotta pay if you want murder" - Cap 😂 That giant exchange of missiles was pornographic 🔥🔥🔥 probably my favorite GR vid yet!
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
thx
@chrisinstasis7986
@chrisinstasis7986 Жыл бұрын
Much respect for the effort expended tweaking the missiles.
@dan.vitale
@dan.vitale Жыл бұрын
35:19 - Cap's brain suffers a blue screen of death.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
lol
@alleycatsphinx
@alleycatsphinx Жыл бұрын
Something about all the batteries failing somehow seemed realistic...
@WesEklund
@WesEklund Жыл бұрын
Let's assume Chinese actually fire PL-15s at operational range with battery, AND coordinated targets across flights. Different battle I think
@TheWeatherbuff
@TheWeatherbuff Жыл бұрын
@CAP I've been enjoying all these great videos. Thank you for putting them out there for us. I'm in Civil Air Patrol, and we had 20 Cadets learning combat maneuvers in DCS last weekend. It's not surprising that the Cadets beat the grown-ups every time... including some former USAF pilots.
@jimkluska253
@jimkluska253 Жыл бұрын
@ Montgomery burns. Be safe and thanks for keeping us safe!
@TheWeatherbuff
@TheWeatherbuff Жыл бұрын
@@jimkluska253 Thanks Jim. DCS is keeping the Cadets engaged while they learn all the other stuff. It helps a ton!
@jimkluska253
@jimkluska253 Жыл бұрын
@@TheWeatherbuff I love it. I started about 5 months ago and I cant believe how intense it is. Except for the g"s....I hear its pretty accurate. ( from current and former pilots) GOD BLESS you and the cadets!!!
@TheWeatherbuff
@TheWeatherbuff Жыл бұрын
@@jimkluska253 Very kind of you, Jim. Can I ask which joystick or HOTAS you're using?
@jimkluska253
@jimkluska253 Жыл бұрын
@@TheWeatherbuff sure, a gift from my 2 boys,( well, young men) bought me a thrustmaster 16000 with pedals for Christmas. I dod some research on it and for the money I hear it's one of the best.. it has a fairly good button count. And the guts on the stick are the same as the 800.00 warthog. Although I hear the warthog ( thrustmaster 's top dog) is awesome. I like it. What do you use?
@trev8591
@trev8591 Жыл бұрын
EPIC! That is all, carry on as you were.
@flufffycow
@flufffycow Жыл бұрын
"Would you like to play a nice game of chess?"
@marinuslubbe3993
@marinuslubbe3993 Жыл бұрын
Really nice vid once again. It's a shame the AI is acting kinda stupid like firing dozens of missiles at 2 planes, but you can't really do anything about that. The PL15's also seem to be nerfed or something, they were missing like crazy here.
@hughmungus2760
@hughmungus2760 Жыл бұрын
DCS need AI rules of engagement like in CMANO. where you can set the AI to fire no more than a set number of missiles at a target
@WilfChadwick
@WilfChadwick Жыл бұрын
Limit the first fire distance per Chinese flight incrementally, so as to give a more varied targeting probability. After all, as long as they get their missiles off before being hit themselves, they will then have been an effective asset.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
TBH I'd just rather get the PL-15 fixed so I don't have to worry about the problem.
@EasyE865
@EasyE865 Жыл бұрын
so damn cool, absolutely love your channel!!!
@obelisk21
@obelisk21 Жыл бұрын
The one thing you never model in-game is a CAP for the fleet. Depending on the political scenario the CAP could be covered by the fleet itself but more likely in this scenario, the Air Force from Okinawa would provide CAP for the fleet so the fleet deck crew does not get worn out and is prepared for extended shifts should a military escalation occur.
@92HazelMocha
@92HazelMocha Жыл бұрын
I find that pretty unlikely; Okinawa would probably be the reserve for follow-on/escalation.
@obelisk21
@obelisk21 Жыл бұрын
@@92HazelMocha From what I read it is normal for the Airforce to provide CAP when it will be for an extended period as the carrier group is not staffed on the deck crew for extended CAP operations. They would simply burn them out. Once the carrier group goes into the correct threat level they would then escalate to basically 24/7 air operations.
@Kevin-hb7yq
@Kevin-hb7yq Жыл бұрын
Just as a guess, the carrier fleet would probably use support CAP from land base as soon as it was inside of coverage range.
@hwong1776
@hwong1776 Жыл бұрын
The biggest thing that irks me is how small the chinese force is. Like it's the 7th fleet I would expect at least twice as many chinese planes minimum
@peterjones2241
@peterjones2241 Жыл бұрын
Great videos mate, thanks 🙏
@johnhmstr
@johnhmstr Жыл бұрын
35:18 Cheezus chruust on a pogo stick that is a ton of missiles in the air. What a terrifying and beautiful sight. Well done all around! this is some serious work you all have done here.
@AlaskaPilot18
@AlaskaPilot18 Жыл бұрын
The two Super Hornets flying escort for the northern AWACS contributed heavily to the outcome IMO. They drew a ridiculous number of PL-15s out against two targets, but there were plenty of targets for all their AMRAAMs. Then, as you realized at the end, when it looked like China was winning for a while the Americans were steadily putting more planes in the air as fast as China could knock them down. Plus America got lucky keeping the one AWACS.
@trottheblackdog
@trottheblackdog Жыл бұрын
That was fantastic. Just beautiful.
@nishantgupta2137
@nishantgupta2137 Жыл бұрын
Love Your Content
@jimburtz6520
@jimburtz6520 Жыл бұрын
Love your stuff guys!
@kawco
@kawco Жыл бұрын
This was excellent! Epic battle!
@rainieresguerra4780
@rainieresguerra4780 Жыл бұрын
The Chinese will not merely rely on land and sea based radars. It will rely mainly on sattelites. The launch of multiple land based missiles will be immediately detected by american/european/ japanese/ S. Korean sattelites as well. I'd say, the Chinese will use its militia fishing fleet to launch some of the anti-ship missiles to cut the striking distance.
@DisgruntledDisabledCombat_Vet
@DisgruntledDisabledCombat_Vet Жыл бұрын
Hey cap, I’m just getting into DCS from hours of experience flying in arma games, and other FPS games with vehicles, ships, artillery, ships, infantry, and drones etc. If you need someone to fly a harrier or a fighter with a full payload of anti ship missiles, or a payload of dummy missiles that will be fired to be diversions, that way real accurate ship killers will have a higher chance of not getting shot down. I’ll even fly a B2 spirit bomber to even drop a low yield nuke, or a entire payload of cluster bombs set to blow up at different altitudes, to cover a wide area and hopefully hit any missiles that are out to shoot down friendly. Also, Japan has nuclear warheads pointed and targeted at set locations in China. So realistically if our fleet got attacked, the Americans stationed at the secret locations will go down into the bunkers, and wait for orders on firing those warheads. True story my buddy was first stationed there when he just joined the chair force, and if the commanding officer didn’t get them to stand down. They would’ve launched all nuclear warheads by accident and caused WW3. Anyway, I’ll describe my background, and what military experience I have in real world. Just a little hint on what I used to do, I used to work with new CTACs who I had fun training and with TACPs who I’d learn something’s from. OIF-OEF 03-12(7 tours) 10years before I got out, and 8 years to get 100% P&T disability. Anyway I live in hawaii and will be happy to play an OP4 or being an extra guy that will divert attention, and launch an entire payload at a high ALT to throw off defense’s, or fly a huge airbus with a modified payload or chaff/flare for evade. I’ll fly one to pull all agro to throw off the opposite sides force, and hope everyone wants to target the huge plane that looks like a giant bomber lol. Hahah my 64Gb DRR5 and 12 Gb GDDR6X 3080ti would love viewing all of this action.
@m1t2a1
@m1t2a1 Жыл бұрын
The only nuclear weapons in Japan are on passing American ships.
@DisgruntledDisabledCombat_Vet
@DisgruntledDisabledCombat_Vet Жыл бұрын
@@m1t2a1 not in Okinawa. The incident happened before I was born during the early 60’s and my friend just got into the chair force. This is a well known close call where they received launch order/codes from Kadena. They had all bay doors open base locked down, and MPs armed at the main launch room, outside the room, and wherever the places that their secret SOP for that alert placed them. Also, this past march or may before Abe died, they signed a treaty with nato to arm Japan (not secretly like in the past) with nuclear weapons for deterrence.
@Sansarii_Minecraft
@Sansarii_Minecraft Жыл бұрын
Are you sure you should be telling us this lol
@peejmeista
@peejmeista Жыл бұрын
Sign this guy up Cap, he’s keen!
@m1t2a1
@m1t2a1 Жыл бұрын
@@DisgruntledDisabledCombat_Vet That's about the same time America made Canada a nuclear power. Supposedly gone from there now.
@greghanson5696
@greghanson5696 Жыл бұрын
Well done Grim Reapers.
@momogames3704
@momogames3704 Жыл бұрын
Woah thanks for picking up recommendations and applying it you tried to make it as realistic as you can.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
thx
@Anarchy_420
@Anarchy_420 Жыл бұрын
45:43 lol it'd be a "Conflict" ;) 46:51& 2:43 again perhaps having them attack from multiple directions and in smaller waves as well instead of one big blob would help Plus the 2:43 problem that's two reasons to try this👍
@williamrausch4245
@williamrausch4245 Жыл бұрын
The previous USS America CV-66 WAS a oil powered CV of the Kitty Hawk class. She was decommission in 1996 and used for weapons testing and damage testing against a carrier in 2005.
@nashonwesonga4480
@nashonwesonga4480 Жыл бұрын
That was amazing to watch 💪🏿🤜🏿
@TheCaptainbeefylog
@TheCaptainbeefylog Жыл бұрын
35:00 onwards reminds me of scenes from Robotech. IRL deconfliction would be better due to better comms between pilots and AWACS controllers. "Public Server" = no control of battlespace as everybody is out for indvidual glory rather than sticking to a set mission and actually following orders.
@jamison884
@jamison884 Жыл бұрын
Great video as always. Below, I basically just agree with your conclusion at the end of the video. The one thing I really wanted to see is how the Aegis network handled those anti-ship missiles! It would be awesome if you take that 7th fleet with all of those cruisers and destroyers and see if it can defend that attack. For visual purposes, I think it would look awesome if the missiles came in from 360 degrees and time-on-target. I was going to say exactly what you said at the end. The limitation right now lies in DCS AI and in particular the modeling of realistic logistics/battle management/datalink. While I don't know this for a fact, I can only assume the US takes their air superiority very seriously and that would mean planning/training for the possibility of huge aerial battles involving many dozens of plans on both sides. In such a scenario, I don't see how the USAF and USN would simply ignore the issue of optimizing their targets given the total number of missiles they can carry. In fact, I'm sure such strategies are worked on by running their own internal war games and testing various parameters/outcomes with real-world decision-making and load-outs. Since the US has such an emphasis on high-quality radar, electronic warfare, AWACS, command & control, and so, I believe they will definitely have software-assisted decision trees to specify in very short timeframes to decide which pilots should fire, along with the selected missile/proper range, and specific target. When we see the rudimentary radar and targeting systems modeled in DCS you effectively select a target manually (with the capability to select multiple targets for ripple salvos) and send it. This method dates back to the 1970s/1980s, so I have to believe their methods for target selection and distribution are much more advanced at present.
@jsublett8871
@jsublett8871 Жыл бұрын
that was fantastic 👏 👌. great to watch, hopefully never happens.
@strambino1
@strambino1 Жыл бұрын
That’s such an awesome scenario Cap!! Great work to all the reapers! Can you do a big Chinese or Russian carrier group against seventh fleet cap?
@splatoonistproductions5345
@splatoonistproductions5345 Жыл бұрын
It would be pretty cool to see potentially more hypothetical forces in different scenarios in the future, like a future Royal Navy w the new type 26, type 31 and 32 frigates coming soon, maybe someday if they get modelled and stuff. Also, about the above scenario type stuff, something like hypothetical country military/economic alliances like the proposed CANZUK, including the Uk, Australia, New Zealand and Canada, that could bring some interesting scenarios
@Hellfox777
@Hellfox777 Жыл бұрын
Damn. Ok, that was impressive
@Snowwie88
@Snowwie88 Жыл бұрын
I think this is the first episode of a big simulation in which HALF the time of the entire video goes up on informing and briefing before actually going to fight 😄
@ARGAR_GAMES
@ARGAR_GAMES Жыл бұрын
I like these vids!
@williamcorbitt9594
@williamcorbitt9594 Жыл бұрын
You do an excellent job in putting these together. You should be quite proud of all your work. Also, your narration is spot-on. Better than the movies. But ... where are the subs? FYI: Multiple subs are always with the 7th fleet.
@quarefremeruntgentes
@quarefremeruntgentes Жыл бұрын
DCS software cannot model submarines. Since much of submersible tech is classified, it seems unclear whether that aspect will ever change. Aside from that, in an air battle of attrition, it seems to me subs would be hunkering below the surface, trying to avoiding enemy sonar buoys and fixed sonar arrays, and maintaining radio silence. At most, maybe a sub might advance to somewhere just outside the range of Chinese sonar, and try to lob a few Tomahawks at Chinese air bases (??).
@timblack6422
@timblack6422 Жыл бұрын
Awesome battle!!!
@ptren5779
@ptren5779 Жыл бұрын
Great Video
@MrKbtor2
@MrKbtor2 Жыл бұрын
With all it's imperfections this was a hoot!
@scottnord9602
@scottnord9602 Жыл бұрын
Well done Cap!
@DigitalDonAV
@DigitalDonAV Жыл бұрын
Love these videos
@kashishsoni6046
@kashishsoni6046 Жыл бұрын
Hey Cap, Would the AWACS Reach to the periphery of the radar ranges to maintain only some overlap between their radar detection ranges, and the Naval radars' ranges. In such a way to maximise the Radar coverage in the air. The US Does have a pretty good datalink, it would make sense for them to utilise it fully. This might not be a thing to do for AWACS under a heavy air to air fight going on but during the later stages they would maximise radar coverage in order to cover any lingerers.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
Interesting.
@kingjehukhan8541
@kingjehukhan8541 Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@davidcope3304
@davidcope3304 Жыл бұрын
There was a USS America Carrier. CV-66 a Kitty Hawk class. Decommissioned in 96 and scuttled in 05 after a live fire testing. To bad nobody can dive her as she sits close to 17000 feet underwater
@kylewilliams8012
@kylewilliams8012 Жыл бұрын
That first super bug was on smoke 😂
@rainieresguerra4780
@rainieresguerra4780 Жыл бұрын
This video should also take into account the new air defense systems integrated into their planes by both sides.
@bonesmiginty2458
@bonesmiginty2458 Жыл бұрын
Hey, Cap. As always, great video. I have a suggestion for a future video. I'm an American, and as such, a huge F-22 fan. I know that the American military is a bit concerned about the F-22's, and similarly the F-35's range in the Pacific theater should hostilities break out with China. I would love to see you guys test a 5th gen strike along the Chinese coast using Raptors and Lightnings launched from say, Okinawa. I'd love to see some F-22 vs Mighty Dragon action (also, are the AIM-120D's working with the Raptor mod in game at the moment?). But primarily, I'd love to see if you guys could launch from Okinawa with external fuel tanks on the Raptor, link up with a tanker enroute, strike along the coast and make it back with fuel to spare. Thanks for considering this! - Brad
@jtom9086
@jtom9086 Жыл бұрын
Cap the PL 15 doesn’t seem to track the targets at long range ? Can u fix that cap and Aim 120 D mod seem to work pretty well now .Overall, i really enjoy your wargame series Cap ,hope to see more like this in the future 🔥
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
Will get this fixed.
@YouTube_can_ESAD
@YouTube_can_ESAD Жыл бұрын
Former USAF, You rock Cap, just found out about the channel and I’m enjoying it very much! Thank you! 🔥🔥🔥
@tokencivilian8507
@tokencivilian8507 Жыл бұрын
'Merica! Eff Yeah! Great vid, as always Cap and the GR team. We both know the only way the ChiComs will win is if they all ditch their canopies and toss bomb nukes, like Cap does. ;-)
@paez4779
@paez4779 Жыл бұрын
People who use Wikipedia as reference for missiles capabilities don't realize that most of that info is classified because if we knew the exact range and capabilities than we would know how to defend against. So we can't go off what is given in Wikipedia.. your vids are good no matter what.
@MGZetta
@MGZetta Жыл бұрын
Batteries "dying" mid-flight is the stupidest thing I have ever seen especially from the country that manufactures the most batteries in the world. I mean, China, as a country, sent an orbiter, lander, and hover to mars in one mission and succeeded on the first try. So I think it's not that wrong to assume that they can use a battery properly. That's just me tho.
@vk3dgn
@vk3dgn Жыл бұрын
Yes, thermal batteries are relatively simple and well understood. Batteries used in spacecraft and missiles/hittiles are much the same. They're not necessarily the usual lithium or other consumer chemistry, very reliable and deliver huge amounts of electrical energy for short periods of time.
@MattyJ55046
@MattyJ55046 Жыл бұрын
The murder f 35s should revert to stealth once the missiles are fired. Like have the pylons detach after firing as well.
@williamhumber5890
@williamhumber5890 Жыл бұрын
Doesn't actually work like that in real life though. Even if you could detach the pylons you're left with exposed attachment hardware that will give a large radar return. The midlife update to the F-22 will supposedly have something to address this but as of now this wouldn't work.
@blake9908
@blake9908 Жыл бұрын
@@williamhumber5890 Either way, the cross section would be reduced
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
Technicallty may work in game, but can;t do it in real life.
@scottb3154
@scottb3154 Жыл бұрын
Late to the comments, but THANK YOU for such an absolutely exhilarating show! My two suggestions for the next iteration are (1) fix the battery problem on the Chinese missiles (obviously) and (2) I still don't think you got the timing quite right at the start. I think the J20's need to attack and try to kill the AWACS well before the main attack is seen on any radar. The US would know that the AWACS were being attacked and would try to scramble everything, but they wouldn't know exactly where to send those planes if AWACS was shot down. Or maybe the CAP aircraft would go active radar and then see the attack coming? Might depend on whether the CAP was F-18's or F-35's, I suppose, given the different radar detection ranges.
@neilwilkins9002
@neilwilkins9002 Жыл бұрын
How your server did not pack up and fo home....Great video guys
@Eo_Tunun
@Eo_Tunun Жыл бұрын
My tupence: In real life, such a huge Chinese formation would not be able to surprise a U.S. carrier group. The preparations for such an attack would be spotted from space several hours before they even took of. The factor why the U.S. side did so much better in this simulation probably was simply having more missiles on the F-35s. The sheer firepower overwhelmed the attack.
@petergottlieb
@petergottlieb Жыл бұрын
Yes, just watching both of them makes it clear that the fully loaded US planes made a massive difference.
@alexandrebelinge8996
@alexandrebelinge8996 Жыл бұрын
That was pretty cool :)
@mmcion1
@mmcion1 Жыл бұрын
2D overall tactical view is great! I personally prefer mostly 2D with some 3D sprinkled in for these Wargames. Thanks for the video.
@chimerancreator9797
@chimerancreator9797 Жыл бұрын
@Grim Reapers It would be cool to see a mass free for all fight let everyone pick whatever plane they want to fight with and just have at it lol. be super fun to watch.
@FalcoGer
@FalcoGer Жыл бұрын
you can put the AI aircraft on late activation and make a trigger in the F10 comm menu. After the humans took off from the carrier you can then do the F10, trigger the trigger and have the AI spawn in. That way you get the takeoff for the humans and the AI will wait, instead of the other way around.
@pepemalin1
@pepemalin1 Жыл бұрын
Nice job Cap and the team! But i have one nagging question. Since it's all about a surprise attack, why aren't the rules of engagement simulated? As for the US navy planes will probably launch but will wait until being fired upon before engaging even if they are facing an aerial armada in front... Just asking...
@Kevin-hb7yq
@Kevin-hb7yq Жыл бұрын
Yeah, there would indeed be issues until the first shots. But then the video would be either way too long or way too short. 😃
@avirajdastidar7691
@avirajdastidar7691 Жыл бұрын
The bots probably can't understand that probably-I guess it would be a programming issue
@pepemalin1
@pepemalin1 Жыл бұрын
@@avirajdastidar7691 I remember in Jane's f-15 it was already back then to set the ROE for the AI in the mission builder. Guess DCS should be able to do it...
@pepemalin1
@pepemalin1 Жыл бұрын
@@duanemckinley9353 perhaps. But having the ROE option can definitely provide more tactics for an opposing force with older weapons systems. I remember during Vietnam Air war how the BVR tactics were affected by multiple ROE and restrictions, which allowed the Vietnamese to use ambush air attacks and rendering the sparrow missile less efficient. Might bring another layer of realism rather than have 2 armies charging like in the medieval era😄 Now I know it can be a pain in the ass to set all of this.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
Great point BUT this would be just too difficult for me to model in game. While technically possible, it would take too many hours to program each AI unit to follow the rules and then test. If I ever get big enough to have a team, I'll do it then/
@MrBenHart
@MrBenHart Жыл бұрын
When the US navy conducts freedom of navigation exercises in the Taiwan straight how vulnerable are they to Chinese attack from various land based defenses?
@WilfChadwick
@WilfChadwick Жыл бұрын
22:45 lack of pragmatism, America's Achilles heal. It will bite your arses quite badly one day.
@Sound_Stable
@Sound_Stable Жыл бұрын
I'm just glad we got the Amazon Basics batteries in the PL15s properly modeled.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
oof
@mrhedgebull1658
@mrhedgebull1658 Жыл бұрын
This is why I love this channel. Even MY stupid ideas get taken seriously. Taking out the AWACS didn't seem to help the Chinese much.
@Kevin-hb7yq
@Kevin-hb7yq Жыл бұрын
I'd guess that the Chinese would support an attack like this with more than one AWACS, and the Americans would rapidly deploy additional Airborne radar assets in the event of an attack.
@92HazelMocha
@92HazelMocha Жыл бұрын
Cap, China would definitely have ships (destroyers at a minimum) because it's the coast of China which is where they would be stationed and this scenario takes place after China has launched an amphibious invasion of Taiwan.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
Oh I see what you mean. I thought you guys meant attacking the naval ships with the Chinese navy, but you mean attacking the aircraft? Yeh I didn't think about that. TBH I doubt the server would cope with that anyways.
@92HazelMocha
@92HazelMocha Жыл бұрын
@@grimreapers No worries, you put a lot of work into these already and they're great fun
@aaronbryant1008
@aaronbryant1008 Жыл бұрын
With the amount of pilots in the water, they could very well continue this battle with 9MM broadsides...
@JandC007
@JandC007 Жыл бұрын
How about using 2 B1 bombers out of Japan or ?? and they are loaded (internal and external) with long range missiles to handle both aircraft and inbound missiles
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Жыл бұрын
Problem with B1 is that noone can agree on it's RCS.
@DJDennyRay
@DJDennyRay Жыл бұрын
Kadena is Air Force. I was stationed there and they are very fussy about that distinction. ANOTHER great mission! 07
@Wolfe351
@Wolfe351 Жыл бұрын
Xcellent Briefing Cap!!
@mmxmmx-zo2my
@mmxmmx-zo2my Жыл бұрын
Great job guys. Random request. Can you do a hypothetical straight fight between the French carrier is task force and rafales and accompanying weapons systems versus one of the British carriers and the f35s? Would be really interesting to see the difference in UK/ US tech versus French.
Ouch.. 🤕
00:30
Celine & Michiel
Рет қаралды 21 МЛН
НРАВИТСЯ ЭТОТ ФОРМАТ??
00:37
МЯТНАЯ ФАНТА
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
skibidi toilet 76 (full episode)
8:11
DaFuq!?Boom!
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН
Brawl Stars Animation: PAINT BRAWL STARTS NOW!
0:52
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
РАТТЕ, почему ты меня ПРЕДАЛ?
5:04
• Gerand •
Рет қаралды 570 М.