That's cool to preserve that history

Holy crap dude 😳 🍻🍹🍸 I'm assuming you must've lost alota friends that morning 😢

It’s really interesting to hear you were an intern bc you don’t always hear that point of view . People who were interns or even temporary employees who might have been there that day . Glad to hear you’re okay 🙏🏽

The day Jack saved your life. A true anomaly in its own.

Partying at 5am on a Tuesday is wild

@@tommccarthy9140not when you are 19 😂 at that age I would party all night get 1 hour of sleep go to work and be ready to go back out partying once I clocked out of work 😂

He does not want to get demonetized

@@Maddawgsports makes sense.

​@@Maddawgsports In relation to anything gory, yes. I'm not sure how monetization relates to any other instance of this.

​@@MaddawgsportsI'm not positive, but I think 9/11 videos don't get monetized anyways.

If you’re that visual change your thumbnail lord gawd

That "tire" was found one year later AFTER everyone with half a brain was wondering where the plane parts were. It suddenly appeared.

@@zariballarda simple google image search proves you 100% wrong. There’s a tire attached to landing gear surrounded by federal agents and yellow crime scene tape the day of 9/11 stop with your non sense

@@zariballardjust like the pristine terrorist passports lol

Thats my office now 😮 40 rector street

@@riqcluv5438delete this. Don’t dox yourself lol

She was the longest hospitalized survivor, Deborah M. was her first name and last initial

@@edreynolds8721I believe also that some plane part landed hundreds of yards away and wedged itself between two buildings, laying undiscovered until fairly recently.

With dump trucks lining the streets TWO DAYS PRIOR to 9/11, ready to carry the debris off to the barge and send all the evidence away to China ASAP. Read "Beyond a Pale Horse".

And sent back to us as toasters from temu

@@nickypoundtown9568 oh oh temu oh oh temu all your beams come back through, shop like a billionaire!

@@nickypoundtown9568 It is true.

@@Anson120why would they sell it to those countries?

It’s disgusting that a nation that prides itself on truth and free press we find a lot of censorship these days.

​@@sonofhibbs4425 That's the Democrats for you. Even worse most of them support Hamas and Hezbollah.

We don't know if that was Edna.. let's stop saying that

Thats impossible to tell but I would say hundreds. Most of them being fire fighters

No, they nearly all died inside​@@RichieD_21

He can’t say with certainty? There were parts before they even went down so that day and night you talked about is a bit off

KZfaq hates America and Israel.

Yikes

@@posticusmaximus1739 yes the airplane tire ripped her back off and somehow someone carried her to the ambulance. I imagine that there are some other crazy stories that happened.. but that one stands out..

The woman in question was Deborah Mardenfeld, and yes; she survived, though paralysed from the waist down. Also fun fact: she was the first (initially) unidentified casualty (John/Jane Doe) of 9/11.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/irWAgLpy1LKYoJs.htmlsi=ZcZZIUAgrFS_wcYn -basically; she lost her left heel and 3/4 of her buttocks. And it was the blades of one of the ejected engines, rather than a tyre.

@@jonathanwebster7091 yeah I was just going by what the paramedic said, I think he said she was missing her back, still it’s amazing to make it through that…

Absolutely, I just commented this very thing on his last video because it’s kind of making me crazy

@@l.w.c.2519 The reason he doesnt show the photos is due to getting De-monetized

My thoughts exactly - would also be nice to link and give credit to the people who did all the initial (real) work. It's a trend on youtube though to take all the credit.

@@Lilgoth89 I can understand that in certain examples, but one of them recently was talking about a photo of a Smokey hallway and it wasn’t on screen when discussed.

Same bro

Same

Same

Reddit's "911archive" has a lot of this stuff - just be mindful of the absolute ghouls that frequent the place.

Good question

If you watch the actual collapse of the towers, you can see the inner core still stands for a few seconds (this is sometimes referred to as the 'spire'). With nothing holding it up, or at least, the structure holding it up being critically damaged, it was unable to hold it up, hence why it collapsed.

2600 dropped 12 feet Is 100,000 foot pounds per square inch, with 1 foot of leverage that's 1,000,000 foot pounds per square inch, the rain of debris inside the towers destroyed the supports and the Columns then buckled and move off the lower columns.

yeah as mentioned in both collapses the core remained for a few moments before falling down i noted that they sway heavily to one side and i believe the concrete cracked on the lower portions as the debris made its way down and must of critically damaged any support it may have had resulting in the spire to unfortunatly collapse and fall down with the rest the only reason part of the core didnt completely get destroyed all the way into the ground on the north tower likely has to do with the spire falling to the side and breaking apart again from their bottom sections so its offsetted and didnt manage to crush wat remained as the miracle stairwell B

@lugiamastero13 Yes the Collapses were a rain of debris inside the perimeter columns that stripped support from the core. It was always well known it was an internal connection failure do to impact from falling debris.

Depends on the tower the only Asbestos was In tower 1.

@@anjou6497 the explosions happened after the lightweight airframe, shell and wings had already cut through the steel beams like a hot knife through butter, not even crumpling slightly. you would have to break multiple laws of physics to demonstrate that again , and nobody could

​@@user_unknown1488if the plane were water it would have done the same because no two atoms can occupy the Same space at the same time, and the planes atoms have enough energy to displace the towers atoms. PS. Using meth is not studying physics.

@@anjou6497 Yes I know but the Aluminum did not cause the collapse the carbons in the black smoke did, burning like creosote in a Chimney fire under a Chimney effect drawing in massive amounts if oxygen.

​@@anjou6497ah, still repeating long-disproven nonsense from the likes of Popular Mechanics (whose publishers were ardent supporters of the nazis and gave their officers priority column space). Gotta love the inability to learn and adapt

​@@carrollsanders9376 Yes I see that was part of the destruction process re the explosions.

I think a lady was hit by a tire, seriously injured, but did survive.

Deborah Mardenfeld; who was the first (initially) unidentified casualty of 9/11. She survived, and is still alive, though paralysed from the waist down.

Because he doesn't want to get demonitized.

It wasn't that no one thought it was a terrorist attack, rather no one wanted to believe that was what was happening, especial given there was an attempt just 8 and a half years prior. It was no longer deniable after the 2nd plane hit.

@@Gabe4Dexactly. Many folks speculated that it could’ve been a terrorist attack before the second plane ever hit. It just came in the form of statements like “there were terrorist bombers who attacked this building in the mid 90s. We have no way to say that’s what this is now, we just don’t know”. A lot of us kinda knew but as you said, we just didn’t want to admit it. Once that second plane hit, we could no longer tell ourselves that it MAY have been an accident.

With all due respect to the replies… I’m referring to me watching the live broadcast & what the reporter were saying. I’m not saying no one thought it was a terrorist attack.

It was no secret the WTC had already been targeted once before on February 26 1993 with the original bombing attack, that alone would've had me assuming the worst the minute the first plane hit.

My dad woke me up shortly after plane one hit and we turned on my TV. I thought the pilot was drunk or on drugs to hit a building on a clear day. When plane two hit I looked at Dad and said "that was deliberate. We're under attack".

The light weight concrete was basically flyash and Cement, easy to pulverize.

Yeah that and gypsum from the drywall and also ceiling tiles

The only thing the two planes that hit the towers have in common is that they left the same airport and that was Logan airport in Boston. They somewhat cross paths because the pilot on flight 175 was asked if he saw flight 11 at first he said no but he looked better and seen flight 11 and he was told to stay clear of flight 11 that was before flight 175 was highjacked. I know that because of the audio that was realsed from the day of 9/11.

Are some lost?

No it hasn't, thousands were removed which contradicted the official story, even (or especially) when those contradictions were firsthand eyewitness accounts

@@gjustg1540 can still find hundreds on KZfaq.. lots of the personal recordings have been released in recent years by the owners that recorded. And KZfaq did lift restrictions on certain videos. Easy to do the research

if you're talking about the piece of debris with the white/grey twirling smoke trail, that was part of the engine. after being ejected from the south tower, it hit the eastern facade of a building, bounced and landed on the street. I think it's the same piece of debris that hit deborah mardenfeld.

I thought there was only one too, the one from the firefighters checking for a gas leak in the streets

I thought there was only one but tbh I Can’t even watch that video it give me nightmares I don’t even go looking for it

there's Jules Naudet's footage (the famous one with the firefighters), but there's also Pavel Hlava's footage recorded from the Battery Park Tunnel entrance in Brooklyn. and then we have Wolfgang Staehle's webcam from across the East River. there's also a purported lost perspective from some sort of news live cam that was on top of some tall building in midtown Manhattan, but I can't remember what it was called. as for sound recordings of the explosion, there's the WNYW perspective from a few blocks east of the complex, the meeting recording by Ginny Carr held on the 36th floor of One Liberty Plaza, and there's also Stephen McArdle's tape recording from inside the lobby of the Marriott Hotel.

You wouldn't want to see that and how fucking disrespectful can you be? I appreciate that you guys are interested And engaging, which is you remembering and its exactly what my generation wanted. Never Forget. Try to have as much respect as you can when you bring these people up. You wouldn't want to see that picture. It doesn't exist, but if it did trust me. Did you know what happens to a Body from that height? Also landing gear did hit a woman ripped off her back from her shoulder down to her thigh. That photo you wanna see And i'm not even kidding would be so alien. A world you never knew. Something a human being was not supposed to see. It's a scene that kind of feels like an authority figure Saying, do you really want to know? Like we've been sheltered protected somehow. Almost like a false reality You thought you know, but you don't know s***.anyways You would just see puddles and ground beef. I thought the firefighter priest was the first to die

@@DennisHayes-tr8jd well, my older brother is Cleveland (OH) Firefighter and all I remember of that time is a bunch of them drove to NYC to help with recovery. I heard Danny's widow speak years back and was just curious.

@@DennisHayes-tr8jd I think the priest gave Danny last rites and then he died too. It's all so sad and heartbreaking.

@JessicaShaffer-fb8ov you're great, thank you very much. I really couldn't mean that more. I overreact to ginger all the time. It's just a very weird subject, but i . Remind myself. Not everybody lived through it so they really don't know. I should just appreciate that people want to know. And I do.thx

​@@HarryF-tz5fo Given the kind of structures they were, I'd say a partial collapse would be more inexplicable than a total collapse. Lots of mutual support and redundancies rendered moot in an instant, then add the heat generation afterward. This part never struck me as inexplicable tbh.

the engine practically got flinged out the building, it didnt go through like mesh, it was still heavily damaged, the engine core got skinned out

The beams didn't "melt", they just got weaker/softened by the intense heat in certain areas. Steel loses alot of it's strength as it heats up, way before it's melting point. Very similar to the way butter softens as it warms. Many of the internals of jet engines are titanium, which has a much higher melting point than steel.

The engines are literally the heaviest part of the aircraft, which means that their INERTIA kept them going through.

@johnp139 Right on. No mild steel beams or thin concrete floor was gunna stop those engines traveling 500+mph

debris from the collapsing north tower opened a huge gaping hole into building 7 and had already crushed a few supports but also started a devestating fire that burned out of control for several hours while fire fighters made an attempt to salvage the building but they reported hearing creaking sounds from it and Larry told the chief to pull out the crew as the building was gonna come down anyways id say 3 hours before building 7 eventually collapsed that building was designed similarly to the twin towers with it being a steel tube design i think this youtuber or another person made a video on this topic as well deeply explaining how the tower actually had been severely compromised and its supports were heavily damaged making its collapse inevitable

@@lugiamastero13 sure buddy 😂

@JaySingh-fv3tr you can literally search these videos on the North towers collapse and see it happen from multiple angles and theses also plenty of videos describing the extent of the damage that it caused. Literally went from conspiracy nut to someone with common sense after doing proper research into that building every year around it's anniversary when these videos begin to pop up on the algorithm

It's a construction pic, so you're right, your comment is pointless.

@@GlobeWarmer Well, your sage and insightful need to attempt to discredit me with pithy veiled insults, is kinda pointless as well. More closer to "pathetic" and "Sad" but, hey, I'll go along with it. Mostly because I really don't give a sh*t at your attempts to feel "superior", anyways.

@@toddkurzbardwhat the hell he do to u 😂😂😂

​@@toddkurzbard the hell is you on? that photo is taken at a big height look at the background how the fk could that be after collapse?

@@V0ID_beats What am I on? Logic. Did you read the WHOLE post? Or merely the part that gave you a perceived opportunity to mock and gaslight? So sorry, Bro. Doesn't work on me. Since, AS I SAID, you evidently didn't (conveniently) read my whole post. So, for your benefit, I will summarize that unfortunatly avoided part for you: I said, QUITE CLEARLY, that it probably DID NOT come from after collapse. As I recall, I made that point more than once. Admittedly, the first part of the post, the image confused me - since the subject of the video was on the post collapses, I erroneously assumed for that moment that it was post-collapse, because that was what the video was about. NOW, I COULD have been dishonest, and changedthat part once I realized my error, but I left it that way, because I felt that to purge it would be dishonest. I CHOSE to leave that portion unchanged, warts and all. I figured, 'hey, if I made a mistake, I might as well let it reflect my initial error'. I was well aware I would get attacked by people like you, who do these things. I didn't give a f*ck. I don't NOW, either. So, now the major part of the post, that you, somehow, conveniently, missed. Carry on, Son.

16 feet? Have you ever been in an airplane??? Anyway,... this is *my summary explanation* of the collapses of the Twin Towers from start-to-finish, based on _my_ observations and without any appeals to, or reliance on any authority. No politics or ideology, my only agenda is what actually happened, which is agnostic to who planned and carried out the 9/11 attacks or why. What you are about to read has the benefit of *not requiring Rube Goldberg levels of complexity, and it makes logical sense* . Each step in the process flows naturally from the one before AND is chock full of critical details _the conspiracy oriented internet tends to leave out_ with no whataboutisms. Myh hope is this will *dispel many common myths and answer most if not all questions you may have* about the Twin Towers collapses. While complex, most of the Twin Towers collapse mechanisms can be seen with the naked eye and easily discerned and understood by the layperson if sufficient time is taken to understand. The worlds engineering community had already largely sorted them out at least as early as October/November 2001. Still, there are many who can’t be bothered to look or perhaps work hard not to see, being more concerned about advancing political/ideological agendas (which is exciting) than science and engineering (which is boring). 1. The Twin Towers consisted of 4 primary structural elements that together _formed an integrated system_ where each relied on the others. 47 hollow box-section steel *Core Columns* carry the majority of the gravity loads. The 236 hollow box-section steel *Perimeter Columns* carry the remainder and ALL of the lateral (wind) loads. Long-span *Lightweight Steel Trusses* connect the core and perimeter column together at each floor with a *Hat Truss* on top to tie the structure together as an integrated unit where no element can survive without the others 2. The impact of 117 tons of airplane (= to about 12 dump trucks) at speeds up to 590 mph completely destroys the aircraft. This in no way implies the Towers come out unscathed. Some folks don’t get that. Hitting with *the energy of up to a ton of TNT* the impact damages or destroys many perimeter and some core columns (33 of 59 perimeter and 20 core columns destroyed at the impact floors in the North Tower), primarily through _bolt-shearing failures_ at the end connecting flanges, as well as_bending, twisting and fracturing_ of weld seams. There was *no cutting or slicing* - the reality was far more violent and messy. 3. The impacts destroy or damage fire insulation, fire breaks and sprinkler systems on multiple floors. Huge fires are started across _multiple floors simultaneously_ and allowed to spread rapidly with no effective fire fighting or fire suppression. This was an _unprecedented fire event_ . All of this was observed and recorded. 4. The *hotter steel gets the weark it gets* . With fire insulation stripped away and no sprinklers the survival time of the steel greatly reduced. Gradually over time heat causes the lightweight steel Floor Trusses at the impact damaged floors to sag, which was observed and recorded. No steel melted nor did it need to. Structural steel will fail long before it turns to a puddle. It just needs to _bend_ 5. Sagging floor trusses pull on the increasingly weak and overloaded Perimeter Columns, causing some of them to bow inward by up to 5 feet. This was observed and recorded. A straight column is up to 4 times stronger than a bent column. 6. The bowed Perimeter Columns buckle and fail, initiating collapse. This was observed and recorded. The formerly static mass above which the structure below could easily support is now converted into a dynamic mass up to 30 times greater. Because they have buckled, the *Columns above and below the failure point are no longer aligned* . The load bearing structure below no logner bears any load as it falls falls _past_ the lower columns, NOT onto them. 7. Thousands of tons of debris fall within the four outer walls, down through the open office space, crashing onto the first intact floor it encounters. This massive impact immediately breaks the bolted connections to the columns as the amount of resistance the Floor Trusses can offer is negligible. The falling debris slows only marginally and briefly. Note: 7a. This is NOT a _solid top block crashing into and “crushing” a solid bottom block_ . 7b. The debris *falls past the columns* not onto them. The columns provide no resistance to the falling debris. 7c. Only the bolted connections of the floor trusses to the core and perimeter columns can offer any resistance. A pair of 5/8” bolts at each end of each truss vs. thousands of tons of falling debris. 8. This floor-led collapse progression _within the four outer walls_ can _only_ go straight down. Note: 8a. This process is often incorrectly referred to as “pancaking” which actually refers to a completely different process rejected at an early stage. The catchy name stuck but nobody knows what it is supposed to mean. Pancaking is too simplistic and inaccurate anyway. More like Kaiserschmarrn. 9. Collapse progresses through the _floor systems_ and *not* down the columns. Rate of floor assembly failures increases with each successive floor as momentum increases, reaching an average acceleration of 0.65 of GA, or 35% slower than true free fall. Bam, bam, bam down the building until there are no more floors to fail. The resistance offered by each successive floor is always the same. The mass and velocity and thus the energy of the falling debris are constantly increasing. The falling mass increases with every floor it destroys as new falling mass is added. Some falls to the sides, but most falls down. More mass, more velocity, same resistance with each floor. The above is unquestionably the _path of least resistance_ 10. The Towers were 985% air by volume and as that air was compressed inside the building it is forced down the tower and blown out the sides *in reaction to the building collapsing* not causing the collapse. Those were not “explosions”, it was compressed air. 11. Perimeter Columns become detached and peel away like a banana _behind_ the collapse front, playing out to the four points of the compass extending to more than 600 feet from the base of the towers. This was observed and recorded, the results quite obvious from examination of the debris pile. 12. Core Columns fail last as their internal beam bracing is stripped away and lateral support from the floor to perimeter columns is lost. This was observed and recorded and is most obvious in the North Tower. 13. For those who care about how long this took, the whole process took 31-34 seconds from the moment the perimeter columns buckled until the last core columns hit the pile, or 1/3 the rate of true free fall. Don’t believe me? Just watch any video of the collapses and note all the loose _and truly free falling debris_ dropping much faster than the towers themselves. 14. What was NOT observed and recorded were the 180-190 dB bangs of high explosives. Nor were the blinding bright flashes of the completely impractical burning thermite. Of course, neither could have caused the silent Perimeter Column buckling that was observed. Neither explosives or thermite could have survived the impacts and subsequent fires either. Cherry-picking a casual comment about hearing a loud noise in an even like 9/11 is not exactly “proof” of _anything_ and the _pre-planned_ demolition case relies entirely on that. There is zero physical evidence to support either conjecture, and no plausible method by which it could happen.Simply, no one in their right mind would bother. Pre-planned demolition is preposterous, utterly impractical and unnecessary proposition. 15. Finally, the Twin Towers were perfectly safe within their design envelope. They only collapsed when taken far outside design parameters by an extraordinary and unprecedented event. To recap: *Impact + Fire (heat) + Time + Gravity = Collapse* . Remove any one of those four elements and there is no collapse. Ignore any of those elements (as most do) and you will never understand the collapses. The Twin Towers were an _integrated system_ in which no one element could survive without the others. One element fails, the rest follow, through the _path of least resistance_ - DOWN - thorugh the open space while bypassing the path of greatest resistance - the columns. Hopefully none of you are still stuck on the _but the lower floors weren’t on fire_ nonsense. I hope you found this helpful as this was meant to be informative not adversarial and serve as the basis of productive discussion. As such, serious comments and questions are always welcome. *Deliberately evasive off-topic derails* are not. Please though, just *one on-topic point at a time* to stay focused. *No Gish Gallop* . This is a living project which is updated and improved frequently. If I have left anything critical out or made any errors of fact, logic or reason please feel free to point them out. _Explain what I got wrong and how_ and I will make the necessary corrections, altering my hypothesis if necessary. Just telling me _I’m wrong_ without explanation tells me you are not serious and probably a bit dim. IF you can offer a more plausible alternative be my guest. So far no one has even tried.

Classified, government will hide it from public because it protects "public safety"

I think I remember watching footage of someone calling a news channel from the 80 something floor of the south tower

@@TwintowerscuzynotHis name was Jim Gartenberg. He called Eyewitness News 7 from the 86th floor. He said the door was jammed and the stairwell was blocked and the core was blown out. He also said debris was falling around him

@@TwintowerscuzynotHis name was Jim Gartenberg and he called ABC News from the 86th floor of 1 WTC.

I don't think so, only a few but I imagine there were thousands of calls that day. The Kevin Cosgrove call is stuck with me forever

Same thing

👍🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲

9 months

Nah, he mostly just talked about debris, as the title said. And he also mostly talked about information I had never heard before.

@@ranman7688yes, I ended up watching most of it and you are correct. He even talked about the tridents or the Trident area but did not actually mention the word. I'm pretty much blown away. That's what I get for judging.

@@edwin3928ohd Humility in the YT comments section is very rare. You've earned my respect.

The rubble pile was up to 14 stories deep (don't forget the basements - which filled up) and spread out over 16 acres. Don't forget the spreading out. A short video relevant to topic: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nbKYZbZ9vpi9iXU.html

Dawson has never had anything interesting to say about 9/11.

Butter balls. That's what.

*Your dog would have thought it was Christmas.💯%*

....that part

I'm going to respectfully disagree with you, but rather than just simply assert _you are wrong_ and beat my chest I will present a detailed affirmative case explaining why mine is the better alternative. I find the collapses of the Twin Towers intellectually fascinating. My primary interest in this topic is in _understanding the actual mechanisms_ of collapse. What failed, how it failed, in what sequence and why. I also enjoy being able to talk about the engineering with others who share an equally _genuine interest_ in understanding _what actually happened_ . So let's talk about it and if you disagree with anything that follows, please let me know what and why. This is *my* summary explanation of the Twin Towers collapses and mine alone, presented as a comprehensive analysis from start-to-finish, based on _my_ observations and supported by evidence, without any appeals to or reliance on any authority. No politics or ideology, my only agenda is the mechanics and engineering - what actually happened and this is agnostic to who planned and carried out the 9/11 attacks or why. Importantly, it *does not require Rube Goldberg levels of complexity, and makes logical sense* . Also, you will learn all sorts of things _the conspiracy oriented internet won’t tell you_ and no whataboutisms. This should *dispel many common myths and answer most **_any_** questions you may have* about the Twin Towers collapses. Twin Towers collapses are complex but most of the mechanisms can be seen with the naked eye and understood by the layperson if sufficient time is taken to understand. Those mechanisms were well understood by the worlds engineering community already by October/November 2001. Still many can’t be bothered to look or work hard not to see as they are often more concerned about advancing political/ideological agendas and bother understanding the science. This will take just a few minutes. 1. The Twin Towers consisted of four (4) primary structural elements which together formed an integrated system. The 47 steel core columns carry the majority of the gravity loads. The 236 steel perimeter columns carry the remainder and ALL of the lateral (wind) loads. Long-span lightweight floor trusses connect the core and perimeter column together with a hat truss on top to tie the structure together as an integrated unit where no element can survive without the others 2. High speed impact of 117 tons jets (= to about 12 dump trucks) completely destroys the aircraft, which in no way implies the Towers come out unscathed. Hitting with the energy of up to a ton of TNT the impact damages or destroys many perimeter and some core columns (33 of 59 perimeter and 20 core columns destroyed at the impact floors in the North Tower), primarily through _bolt-shearing failures_ at the end connecting flanges, _bending, twisting and fracturing_ of weld seams. There was *no cutting or slicing* - the reality was far more violent and messy. 3. Fire insulation, fire breaks and sprinkler systems on multiple floors are damaged or destroyed. Massive fires are started across _multiple floors simultaneously_ and able to spread rapidly with no effective fire fighting or fire suppression in an _unprecedented fire event_ . This was observed and recorded. 4. Steel gets _weaker as it gets hotter_ and it gets hotter faster because of 3. Survival time in fire is reduced. Over time heat causes lightweight steel floor trusses at the impact damaged floors to sag. This was observed and recorded. No steel melted nor did it need to. Structural steel will fail long before it turns to a puddle. You just need to get it to _bend_ 5. Sagging floor trusses pull on and cause the inward bowing of the increasingly weak and overloaded perimeter columns by up to 5 feet! This was again observed and recorded. Bent columns lose much of their ability to support a load. A straight column is up to 4 times stronger than a bent one. 6. The bowed perimeter columns buckle and fail on one face of each Tower, initiating collapse and converting the formerly static mass above them into a dynamic one 30 times greater. Again, this was observed and recorded. Columns above and columns below the failure point are no longer aligned. The load bearing structure below is no longer bearing any load as the mass above falls _past_ the lower columns, NOT onto them. 7. Thousands of tons of debris pour down the open office space _within the four outer walls_ . This loose debris crashes onto the first intact floor it encounters, grossly overmatching the floors load capacity and near instantly breaking the bolted connections to the columns. The amount of resistance the floor offers to this dynamic load is negligible and slows the falling debris only marginally. 7a. Note: This is NOT a _top block crashing into and “crushing” a bottom block_ . 7b. This debris *falls past the columns* not onto them, thus the columns can provide no resistance to the falling debris. 7c. The only structure resisting the collapse is the bolted connections of the floor trusses to the core and perimeter columns. A pair of 5/8” bolts at each end of each truss vs. thousands of tons of falling debris. 8. This floor-led collapse progression _within the four outer walls_ can _only_ go straight down. 8a. This process is often incorrectly referred to as “pancaking” which actually refers to a different process for describing collapse _initiation_ stage that was rejected at an early stage. Pancaking is too simplistic and inaccurate a term anyway. More like Kaiserschmarrn. 9. Collapse progresses through the _floor systems_ and *not* down the columns. Rate of floor assembly failures increases with each successive floor as momentum increases, reaching an average acceleration of 0.65 of GA, or 35% slower than true free fall. Bam, bam, bam down the building until there are no more floors to fail. 9a. As the next floor is impacted, momentum is briefly slowed before accelerating in free fall again 12 feet to the next floor. Velocity and momentum are constantly increasing. 9b. With each floor failure the falling debris gains mass, momentum and energy as it descends to the next floor. The falling mass increases with every floor it destroys as new falling mass is added. Some falls to the sides, but most falls down. More mass, more velocity, same resistance with each floor. 9c. The above is unquestionably the _path of least resistance_ 10. As air is compressed inside the building (95% air by volume) it is forced down the tower and out the sides. This was observed and recorded. 11. Perimeter columns become detached and peel away (think banana) _behind_ the collapse front, being splayed out in a long line out to more than 600 feet from the base of the towers at the four points of the compass. This was observed and recorded, the results quite obvious from examination of the debris pile. 12. Core columns fail last as their internal beam bracing is stripped away and lateral support from the floor to perimeter columns is lost. This was observed and recorded and is most obvious in the North Tower. 13. The whole process took 31-34 seconds from the moment the perimeter columns buckled until the last core columns hit the pile. For those who care about such things that is 1/3 the rate of true free fall. To further prove this _free fall_ nonsense is just that, watch any video of the collapses and note the loose _and truly free falling debris_ dropping much faster than the towers themselves. 14. What was NOT observed and recorded were the 180-190 dB bangs of high explosives or the blinding bright flashes of thermite, neither of which could have caused the observed perimeter column buckling and neither of which could have survived the impacts and fires anyway. Cherry-picked casual comments removed from proper context where someone says they heard a loud noise don't exactly cut it. There is zero physical evidence to support either conjecture and both are pure fantasy, totally unsupported by evidence, logic, reason or even simple observation. Further, no one in their right mind would bother. Pre-planned demolition is preposterous, utterly impractical and unnecessary proposition. 15. The Twin Towers were perfectly safe within their design envelope: They collapsed when taken grossly outside their design parameters by an extraordinary event. The Twin Towers were an _integrated system_ in which no one element could survive without the others. One element goes, the rest follow. To recap: Impact + Fire (heat) + Time + Gravity = Collapse. Remove any one of those four elements and there is no collapse. Collapse started (initiated) in the perimeter columns and continued (progressed) through the _path of least resistance_ - the floor systems, bypassing the path of greatest resistance - the columns. Hopefully after reading this none of you are still stuck on the _but the lower floors weren’t on fire_ nonsense. If you are, start over. Hopefully you found this helpful. This is intended to be informative, not adversarial and to serve as the basis of productive discussion. *Serious* comments and questions are therefore welcome. *No Gish Gallop* and no *deliberately evasive off-topic derails* please - just *one on-topic point at a time* to stay focused. This is a living project which is updated and improved frequently. If I have left anything critical out or made any errors of fact, logic or reason please feel free to point them out. _Explain what I got wrong and how_ and I will make the necessary corrections, altering my hypothesis if necessary. Just telling me _I’m wrong_ without explanation tells me you are not serious and probably a bit dim. Alternative hypothesis at least as rigorous as what I have just presented are highly desired - if you can do it.

@MFitz12 they took down all the good information off internet 🤣. Refuse to debate like most important questions. The matrix aka kazarian mafia 😎

@@MFitz12very well done analysis and explanation. I doubt you will ever get any alternative hypotheses as vigorously prepared as yours, because there are none. All they say is “controlled demolition”with no logic o evidence to back up their ridiculous stance. It’s infuriating honestly whenever I see it. Thank you for writing that analysis it’s spot on from what I’ve seen in video and I’ve been looking at it for almost 23 years. Well done.

@@thomas.1995Mfitz just made all that stuff up. There’s no engineering nor scientific logic that backs up any of it 🙄

Yes, I do. No longer able to work in academia due to a traumatic brain injury suffered in a cycling accident, this former tooth specialist confirmed her disability by writing a really stupid book about magical space beams powered by hurricanes that turn entire buildings into "dust" (and mildly singe some cars). Because that is the sort of thing one would do when staging what absolutely has to look like terrorists using hijacked Kamikaze planes _and nothing else_ FFS 🤦‍♂🤦‍♂

@@MFitz12 WHO ASKED YOU?

@@boriskaragiannis - You did.

L

Meds, now

Fascinating study. Not of the events of 9/11, of course, but of the inner workings of the mind of a madman.

Did your parents have any children that lived????

Theirs video footage of steel melting flowing like lava down the side of the building so what caused so much heat to melt steel. Why are their so many fire fighters who all stated they heard bombs exploding. Fire fighters finding many many floors with extreme amount of damage while they were working their way up evacuating floors. Finding dead body's stuffed into closets. Elevator shafts they claim jet fuel come down to explode inside the lobby that people were found trapped in. The list goes on and on

I am with you, buddy… Some people need to do some better research! Thank you for this comment. Those who know will know right

@@kristencarter9538know what?

@@matthewjv123567 i was referring to knowing the names @QuaaludeCharlie listed on his post. Look into students doing an art project that were spending hours (possibly sleeping there too) on the upper floors back in 2001. Even built a makeshift balcony from their window in the tower!! It will take you into a rabbit hole but it may open your eyes to a new view of 9/11.

No

How the hell would we know it was 23 years ago😂

Maybe Hawaii or Alaska?

@@anjou6497 NIST never calculated the blast pressure.

In the form of jet fuel lol

@@jacoblott1617 not only jet fuel exploded.

NO, not possible no detonation ways were recorded.

@@carrollsanders9376 the sound of detonations was recorded.

Now you're back.... um ok

@@v90660 stumbled upon it without reading the creator.

Playstation

It did what the plaque said, it withstood the impact of passenger jets. It only fell later. Fuel and fire wasn't factored into the equation back then.

They were built to withstand a passenger liner flying into it by mistake, say at 30-40 mph, at speeds that would be normal for flying in a built-up area with lots of tall buildings. What they weren't built to do was withstand was a the force of a passenger liner hitting them at hundreds of miles an hour. No building can withstand that.

Marketing based on a calculation by Robertson on a Dinner napkin in 1969.😂

It was inside job bro

​@@user-lz7kq8ne9eok user-lz7kq8ne9e, because we're totally going to listen to someone with that as their username

🤓🤓🤓

That's due to the fact they were military jets or drones that hit the towers , not flight 11 or 175.

His passport was found,but it was burnt pretty badly. You make it sound like it was in perfect condition when it wasn't.

@@victorpeirce4753 he didn't mention anything about the condition of the passport whatsoever.

@@Cookie-dr6iq He didn't have to. I did. A lot of people think Attas passport was found in perfect condition. It wasn't. Morons.

Well, I don't know about the rest of you; but that's me convinced 👍

Oh you are very wrong

Reinforced concrete where? You do realize the WTC was made up of Steel glass and sheetrock

I always knew the waterjet industry was lying!!!!

The jets were flying at over 500mph. They were fully fueled for flights to Los Angeles. The trusses sagged and eventually the brackets broke from the lattice structure, pancaking on each other. Definitely not a conspiracy.

The World Trade Center towers were steel skyscrapers; 110 stories into the sky were not being supported by “reinforced concrete” The Twin Towers in particular had a unique hollow tube-like design with an open floor plan on all sides, surrounding a central core; the exterior of the WTC was a relatively thin and lightweight exoskeleton-floors supported only by weak trusses between four perimeter walls and the core. And even water can cut through steel at a high enough velocity, that's how a water jet cutter works for cutting all kinds of metals and materials. The high velocity exponentially increased the concentration of energy to levels far beyond what the WTC structures were designed to withstand; e.g. doubling the velocity of a fully-fulled Boeing 767 flying in clear skies at full speed straight toward a tower would quadruple the amount of energy contained in the plane when it struck the tower. The enormous amount of energy released from the initial jet impacts also dislodged spray-on fireproofing on the aforementioned trusses supporting the floors throughout the Twin Towers. Burning steel skyscraper walls and floors full of flammable office materials collapsing in on each other would cause explosions, yes; naturally, whatever was on the floor below had to explode somewhere when the surrounding walls caved in and floors above came down crushing the floor below. Anything that remained would just be pulverized.

What is/was the consensus on that molten material pouring out of the building? I always assumed it was aluminum and/or copper 🤷‍♂️