Language English and multi0ple languages in Sub-titles How can لَحٰـفِظُوۡنَ can not directly refer to Allah!
Пікірлер: 57
@baburayub12365 ай бұрын
Thank you Dr Sahib for giving us understand in such a simple way
@madihauk74743 ай бұрын
Love from UK. we will do what we can to help .
@unlearning_is_chalange6 ай бұрын
❤ I am waiting to have the correct complete translation of the Quran for myself and for my children. Thanks for your endless efforts.
@abdalazizariff51546 ай бұрын
I JUST COPIED AND PASTED YOUR LAST SENTRNCE IN MY COMMENT ABOVE-THANKS
@Bub6755 ай бұрын
Same
@oh24655 ай бұрын
perfect, it’s so logical, thank you for this real translation
@abdalazizariff51546 ай бұрын
Thanks for your endless efforts. amazing teacher-thanks MAY ALLAH BLESS YOU.
@azizpalace4 ай бұрын
Sir, Wow, excellent
@AyeshaHalala5 ай бұрын
I love you Dr Kashif Khan.
@QuranGuide5 ай бұрын
Dear Sister Thank you for your love and appreciation. We would like to contact you and discuss if this is possible Give your contact number or contact us Stay blessed
@gunergurel48215 ай бұрын
emeginize sağlık .iyi ki sizler varsınız..yoksa cahil kalir mahsunlardan olurduk
@shukriyusof21045 ай бұрын
The one book that we must read before we die... The Quran.
@earnesteffort81156 ай бұрын
Thanks brother, your translation seems to be more correct.
@badrudduzachoudhury96915 ай бұрын
I have a small question. Please allow me to ask. In the first half of the sentence 15.9 انا نحن نزلنا , who are this 'WE' (نحن) and who are 'OUR' in ( نزلنا ) ?
@mohdkamil10956 ай бұрын
Salamum alaykum ❤ Bhai Jan hidi Urdu walo ka bhi khyal rakho 😊plz
@QuranGuide6 ай бұрын
محترم برادر ہم اردو اور انگلش ویڈیوز پر فوکس کررہے ہیں۔ اور اسکے ساتھ ساتھ ہم نے اپنی ہر ویڈیو subtitle اون کردیا ھے آپ چیک کرکے بتائیں شکریہ سلامت رہیں
@mohdkamil10956 ай бұрын
@@QuranGuide me Urdu nahi janta bhai jan roman Urdu me likh de plz
@QuranGuide6 ай бұрын
Check in hindi subtitles.
@rabbi6196 ай бұрын
will someone become a kafir if he criticizes or say bad about the prophet.
@afzalsarker83075 ай бұрын
Why not?
@rabbi6195 ай бұрын
@@afzalsarker8307 get lost
@vdisarl63645 ай бұрын
@rabbi619 Did the Prophet Mohamed really exist ? The Quran bears the name of the revelation Mohamed, so the whole question is whether the prophet is really the Prophet we are told ?
@ma3ts5 ай бұрын
The so called Quran reached us through oral and written transmission from generation to generation People hafiz e Quran so on so forth Then all the khalifas and related history etc So Mohammad was the receiver of revelation
@rabbi6195 ай бұрын
@@vdisarl6364 The current messenger is the quran the prophet muhammad has 3 other names injeel, zul karnayn, ismail this is the reason why you see the name mohammad mentioned less in quran.
@ghousiasyed19615 ай бұрын
Assalam Alaikum wa Rahmathullah.. before going any further, plz refer to ayaath 59,64,69 & 72 of surah Waqiah. In all these ayaath , the ending is in plural form, which like the royal “ We”, is used for Allah ta’Ala alone . Please do NOT mislead people, anyone who does that carries the burdens of all he misled, on his back on Judgement day!.. May Allah SWT save everyone from this!
@QuranGuide5 ай бұрын
What if we turn the table and tell you that you are misleading with wrong translations on the verses you mentioned?
@ghousiasyed19615 ай бұрын
Plz first explain the ayath of surah Waqiah that I quoted Thanks!
@QuranGuide5 ай бұрын
Kindly wait for its turn. You are using Tasreef e Ayaat methodology. I would recommend to watch the series on that topic and try to understand that method first. Also, remain patient and don't be aggressive, choose your words wisely. Thank you.
@ghousiasyed19615 ай бұрын
This is an important ayah on preservation of the Quran by Allah ta’Ala , as is ayah 40 of surah Ahzab on khatme Nabuwwath, so nobody can play games with it.
@ghousiasyed19615 ай бұрын
Whatever methodology one uses, the meaning of the Quran cannot be changed!
@farzanaasif14456 ай бұрын
السلام علیکم جب بھی کسی سہل حدیث کو یا دیو بندی کو وڈیو بھیجی ہے تو اس وڈیو کے غلظ یونے کی دلیل وہ یہ کہتے ہیں کہ دیکھیں جو موسیقی جیسے حرام کم سے وڈیو شروع کر رہے ہیں انکا ترجمہ کیسے صحیح ہو سکتا ہے جبکہ ان سب نے اپنی شادی کی تقریب کا اہتمام گانوں سے کر رکھا یوتا ہے ۔ موسیقی ہر بھی ایک ہروگرام کر دیں ڈاکٹر صاحب ۔
@QuranGuide5 ай бұрын
یہ مضمون بہت اہمیت کا حامل نہیں ہے فلوقت اور نہ ہی قرآن کا مضمون ہے. اس پر آپ کو اور بھی بہت مواد مل جائے گا سوشل میڈیا پر. شکریہ
@frostpitt6 ай бұрын
I'm not sure what your point is here. The verse has Nahnu which means We. I take this to mean Allah AND the Malaika. In the context, the disbelievers are asking why has the ziker been sent down to a mad man? Why doesn't he send the Malaika if he is truthful? Allah responds by saying it is indeed We ( Allah and the Malaika) who are supervising/ looking after/ care takers of the sending down of the Zikr. This is not some forever promise. After the revalation was complete, like all other revelations, its now in human hands and no longer being supervised by Allah and the Malaika.
@QuranGuide6 ай бұрын
We do have an answer on Nhanu, but unfortunately was missed during the making of the video. Will upload soon.
@AyeshaHalala6 ай бұрын
Strange! one hand they say don't associate anyone with Allah on the other hand people associate Malaika with Allah. They are all Zoroastrian beliefs what you learn in the translations of the Quran and what you are referring as your mind is also set on such pagan beliefs and this is the reason why you don't understand what Dr Kashif Khan has explained in this video with the correct translation of verse 9 of chapter 15.
@ahsanrocky85416 ай бұрын
@@QuranGuide eagerly waiting...
@frostpitt5 ай бұрын
@@AyeshaHalala For understanding this sentence, it doesn't matter what the Malika are, that's why I did not translate it above and used the word Malaika rather than what it could potentially mean. It's a quite straight forward statement. Most Muslims read into it way to much and then claim that the Quran is the preserved words of God from the time of its revelation until today. This is preposterous and also a statement for which no one has any evidence for since no one has the original copy of the Quran. I understand that Dr Kashif believes that its okay for certain words to be written different or for there to be typos because the essence of the book are scientific and natural truths evident to our sensibilities and that it is THIS which will always be true and hence preserved. Okay, I can partially agree, however, people have to understand that because we do NOT have the original copy, the following are possibilities: 1. Quran is 100% fully preserved.
@AyeshaHalala5 ай бұрын
@@frostpitt I appreciate your reply and concerns. No matter whether you have translated "Malika" or not but you still brought "Malika" into the discussion on that verse in which the word "Malika" is not used. I think you will need to read the whole Quran with its own words to satisfy your concerns.