💛

@@nateloper What fantastic work!! You guys are awesome!

The mythical deluge never happened

@@Charlie94781 the only mythology is evolutionary stories that are not based on scientific investigation that can be falsified but is pure imagination.

Snelling proves that belief in God can make you into a liar.

Hello brother I'd like to speak with you I was once a skeptical athiest as well, do you have discord?

What a shame Snelling did radiometric dating for the uranium exploration industry in Australia. He knows how to do it properly.

Where is the evidence for the claims within Christianity?

What evidence lead you to believe that any god exists, much less the christain god? How did you apply the scientific method to the bible to verify its claims?

​@@2l84me8 this question is getting quite tedious, I am astounded at how patient some people are at just having the discussion. Can we for a moment change the focus to your views? Where are the evidences of your claims against christianity? What evidence can you give that God doesn't exist? There have been countless findings, studies and tests done that prove the bible and christianity. Now it's the skeptics turn, please prove scientifically and objectively that there is no god and that christianity is complete garbage. Give us objective evidence and not subjective evidence.

Amen!

@@jockyoung4491 Actually many of the scientists that founded the various fields of scientific inquiry ...those who literally wrote the books on those fields of study were men and women of faith. Read a book on great scientists in history.

It was to make people think for themselves which is why the Lord God took away the hearing the words. Amos 8:11-13. 11: Behold, the days come, saith the Lord GOD, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst of water, but of hearing the word of the LORD: 12: And they shall wander from sea to sea, and from the north even to the east, they shall run to and fro to seek the word of the LORDm and shall not find it. 13: In that day shall the fair virgins and young men faint for thirst.

Amen 🙏 🙏 🙏 and what was hidden in the dark is being revealed in the light

@@newcreationinchrist1423 I bet you think that is really deep and meaningfull.

No you did not.

If it was formed during the eruption then nobody thinks it took eons to form

@@jockyoung4491welcome to creationism then

@@cosmictreason2242 What did anything I said have to do with creationism?

​@@kevinkelly2162How would you know what he watched or didn't watch? I've watched videos explaining that very thing.

Why don't you think evolution is true? If it's because of your faith, then say so. But there is no scientific evidence against evolution.

​@@jockyoung4491 why are you here bullying everyone. go away

@@headytone I am not bullying anyone. I am discussing science. Disagreement is not bullying

@@headytone bullying? This channel has been misrepresenting science-- several fields of science-- for a long, long time now. It is essential that people shine a light on this nonsense.

@@travisbicklepopsicle You have not said one word to refute the evidence he presented. You've got nothing by hyperbole to add to the discussion.

Reminds me of the verse, about the clouds that release their rain.. and a tree that falls to the south, or to the north, where it falls THERE it shall be. ..just remember that next time they try to pass us that ""but does it make a sound?" The Bible would imply it does, are the seculars "anti science??"

Prophesy spoken and prophesy fulfilled.

They cry out "God is a mass murderer!"

@@georg7120God is the creator of all life🤔He can take who or whatever silly

​@@justinb777 amen! Good response and very true! 😊

Snelling is a jackass.

Or it has been a low energy environment with very slow rate of erosion and degredation.

Which is it? Flowing water or weathering?

@jonathanrussell1140 You do understand that weathered can mean the rock has been rounded/smoothed by flowing water. Ie rocks in a rainwater run off. The two are not mutually exclusive.

@kaisguda Sure, that's possible if you agree with the premise laid out in the video. It becomes irrelevant if billions of years are true. Since each layer is supposedly laid down over many, many years by wind, water, and errosion, then compressed and solidified. We shouldn't see any jagged or sharp edges. Yet, if the premise is true and it was laid down and covered up rapidly, we would expect what is shown in the video.

They're helping creationists be illiterate on science and very confident in their illiteracy.

Yes, you have faith in these people to make your faith in something else more realistic in your perspective. There's nothing scientific that any of these people do.

@@Laughingatsciencedeniers 🥱

​ @Laughingatsciencedeniers 🍌🐒 cumfromnothingsquirtedoutoafishesbut.

@@SK-bw2cv Have your faith, that's okay. But you need to stop pretending or roleplaying that blind faith and starting with conclusions regardless of where the evidence points is doing science. These organizations and people are not science communicators. They're religious preachers and little else.

Stop thanking charlatans for making illiterate people. Its embarrassing. They haven't explained the geological layering of the canyons.

This fraud uses radiometric dating when it suits him

Yes, it's apologetics, not science.

Because those big bolders were floating - right! This is utter nonsense.

@@StudentDad-mc3pu it only takes 12” of water to move an SUV or a truck. A river can move boulders. There is much more force behind a Tsunami. The more force. The bigger the boulder it can move. I can definitely see it happening. If you’ve never made wild clay I guess that would explain why you can’t see that sedimentary layers after years of being under pressure would turn to rock just like petrified wood😂

@@MoonlightMagnolia Have you personally seen a river move boulders? Where is this Tsunami comming from? Trucks have boyance rocks do not, they sit underneath water. This is an entire fantasy you have constructed.

@@MoonlightMagnolia Thanks for the attempt at patronising me. However, the education required is all on the story-teller in the video.

@@MoonlightMagnolia no, there are multiple layers that the grand canyons consist of. Each showing their own geological time. The formation of the grand canyons show that 5 or 6 million years ago, the colorado river cut through the plateau which had been uplifted, leading to millions of years worth of rock erosion, weathering and freeze-thaw events, all of which leading up to the canyon structure we see today. The fact that there are multiple different geological layers proves that there wasn't a flood, since that would have been 1 and 1 only event. Not to mention that even if there was such a flood, there would've been thousands of canyons all around the world, and that floods alone aren't able to cause them to form.

I like his prospective as well, secular scientists will say they 1st believe evolution, and then they go out and explore how evidence in the world will fit into that.

@@Sl15555 Wrong. We say, first believe in evidence and reason. Nobody has any incentive to believe evolution if it wasn't true. Nobody would have even thought of such a thing if evidence and reason had not made it obvious. Assuming the Bible is true is by definition not scientific.

Amen ;) Godspeed

"blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed" applies to email from Nigeria.

Then it is NOT science, is it?

Read up on Walt Brown's hydroplate theory and the pioneering work of Dr. John Baumgardner...who has modeled subduction of the Earth's crust and rapid tectonic movements of meters per second during the Noahic Flood. His computer models have even place the continents where they are today as a result of these movement. Regarding the Hawaiian islands, read up on how fast those islands are eroding away each year. Some of them are said to be 5.1 to 65 million years old but at current erosion rates...they would not have existed a million years ago...despite volcanic growth.

@@nathancook2852 You are a known fraud...see how much effort that took....no evidence whatsoever.

@@nathancook2852 if you want to remain in ignorance that is your choice. Hosea 4:6 “My people are destroyed from lack of knowledge. Because you have rejected knowledge, I also reject you as my priests; because you have ignored the law of your God, I also will ignore your children.”

You enjoy being lied to and misinformed?. Whatever makes you feel closer to some god, I guess.

Not in public schools you're not.

That is the last thing we need.

The day that happens is the day America loses to the world

That will never happen😂

Yes, the schools need a better system of teaching, they are producing close minded people who think they know everything about anything.

The editors could then dispose of the manuscript in a NY minute.

Those mainstream geologists were part of the cabal that attempted to stop this worthy research in the beginning by denying Dr. Snelling permits in the first place. They do not want real scientific research .....if it goes against their dogma ie evolution.

@@nathancook2852yummy boot mmm

​​​@@nathancook2852because that's where the specific folds were where the dating has been done. Those folds aren't outside the park. Saying he could just go get samples from the same layer outside the park shows you aren't paying ANY attention to what he's saying. And they did find something new. It has been supposed that the folds happened due to ductile deformation and his research found that was not the case. That's his point.

Mainstream publishers either wont or cant publish creationistic journals. this leaves evolution providers free reign over what's taught and believed.

Please explain that in this context.

@@paulbriggs3072 major mechanism of Canyon and geologic fissure creation in minutes

?​@@paulbriggs3072

satan is just easily collecting those who say there is no god. Sadly, they have made their choice to live eternally in torment.

@@nathancook2852there’s wayyy more evidence Jesus walked this earth compared to you😂 try again

​@@justinb777Think about what you just said.

@@mehallica666you think

@@nathancook2852instead of facing the truth you say nonsense, it’s you who’s trapped my guy

Even if it were correct, it would not be significant.

@@jockyoung4491 every correction of mainstream priesthood is significant

@@nathancook2852 we don’t have space for a empty claims

@@estimatingonediscoveringthree What is being corrected? We already knew the layers were wet at one time. That's how they became layers.

@@jockyoung4491 uniformitarian mechanisms

No, it's not.

It's the second part

There are no "uniformitarian geologists" any more.

@@jockyoung4491 Very well. Ask a deep time geologist.

I agree but I think he might be taken not seriously unfortunately due to Joe not believing in our lord Jesus christ.

Amen

*Nope! But it **_WAS_** before God gave the AC power to destroy it.*

😂 *The Enuma Elish would later be the inspiration for the Hebrew scribes who created the text now known as the biblical Book of Genesis.* Prior to the 19th century CE, the Bible was considered the oldest book in the world and its narratives were thought to be completely original. In the mid-19th century CE, however, European museums, as well as academic and religious institutions, sponsored excavations in Mesopotamia to find physical evidence for historical corroboration of the stories in the Bible. ***These excavations found quite the opposite, however, in that, once cuneiform was translated, it was understood that a number of biblical narratives were Mesopotamian in origin.*** *Famous stories such as the Fall of Man and the Great Flood were originally conceived and written down in Sumer,* translated and modified later in Babylon, and reworked by the Assyrians ***before they were used by the Hebrew scribes for the versions which appear in the Bible.*** ***In revising the Mesopotamian creation story for their own ends, the Hebrew scribes tightened the narrative and the focus but retained the concept of the all-powerful deity who brings order from chaos.*** Marduk, in the Enuma Elish, establishes the recognizable order of the world - *just as God does in the Genesis tale* - and human beings are expected to recognize this great gift and honor the deity through service. *"Enuma Elish - The Babylonian Epic of Creation - Full Text - World History Encyclopedia"* *"Sumerian Is the World's Oldest Written Language | ProLingo"* *"Sumerian Civilization: Inventing the Future - World History Encyclopedia"* ("The Sumerians were the people of southern Mesopotamia whose civilization flourished between c. 4100-1750 BCE." "Ancient Israelites and their origins date back to 1800-1200 BCE.") *"The Myth of Adapa - World History Encyclopedia"* Also discussed by Professor Christine Hayes at Yale University in her 1st lecture of the series on the Hebrew Bible from 8:50 to 14:30 minutes, lecture 3 from 28:30 to 41:35 minutes, lecture 4 from 0:00 up to 21:30 minutes and 24:00 up to 35:30 minutes and lecture 7 from 24:20 to 25:10 minutes. From a Biblical scholar: "Many stories in the ancient world have their origins in other stories and were borrowed and modified from other or earlier peoples. *For instance, many of the stories now preserved in the Bible are* ***modified*** *versions of stories that existed in the cultures and traditions of Israel’s* ***older*** *contemporaries.* Stories about the creation of the universe, a cataclysmic universal flood, digging wells as land markers, the naming of important cultic sites, gods giving laws to their people, and even stories about gods decreeing the possession of land to their people were all part of the cultural and literary matrix of the ancient Near East. *Biblical scribes freely* ***adopted and modified*** *these stories as a means to express their own identity, origins, and customs."* *"Stories from the Bible"* by Dr Steven DiMattei, from his website *"Biblical Contradictions"* ------------------------------------------------------------------ In addition, look up the below articles. *"Yahweh was just an ancient Canaanite god. We have been deceived! - Escaping Christian Fundamentalism"* *"Debunking the Devil - Michael A. Sherlock (Author)"* *"The Greatest Trick Religion Ever Pulled: Convincing Us That Satan Exists | Atheomedy"* *"Zoroastrianism And Persian Mythology: The Foundation Of Belief"* (Scroll to the last section: Zoroastrianism is the Foundation of Western Belief) *"10 Ways The Bible Was Influenced By Other Religions - Listverse"* *"January | 2014 | Atheomedy"* - Where the Hell Did the Idea of Hell Come From? *"Retired bishop explains the reason why the Church invented "Hell" - Ideapod"* Watch *"The Origins of Salvation, Judgement and Hell"* by Derreck Bennett at Atheologica (Sensitive theists should only watch from 7:00 to 17:30 minutes as evangelical Christians are lambasted. He's a former theist and has been studying the scholarship and comparative religions for over 15 years) *"Top Ten Reasons Noah’s Flood is Mythology - The Sensuous Curmudgeon"* *"Forget about Noah's Ark; There Was No Worldwide Flood | Bible Interp"* *"The Search for Noah’s Flood - Biblical Archaeology Society"* *"Eridu Genesis - World History Encyclopedia"* *"The Atrahasis Epic: The Great Flood & the Meaning of Suffering - World History Encyclopedia"* Watch *"How Aron Ra Debunks Noah's Flood"* (8 part series debunking Noah's flood using multiple branches of science) *"The Adam and Eve myth - News24"* *"Before Adam and Eve - Psychology Today"* *"Gilgamesh vs. Noah - Wordpress"* *"Old Testament Tales Were Stolen From Other Cultures - Griffin"* *"Parallelism between “The Hymn to Aten” and Psalm 104 - Project Augustine"* *"Studying the Bible"* - by Dr Steven DiMattei (This particular article from a critical Biblical scholar highlights how the authors of the Hebrew Bible used their *fictional* god as a mouthpiece for their own views and ideologies) *"How do we know that the biblical writers were* ***not*** *writing history?"* -- by Dr Steven DiMattei *"Contradictions in the Bible | Identified verse by verse and explained using the most up-to-date scholarly information about the Bible, its texts, and the men who wrote them"* -- by Dr. Steven DiMattei

​@@residuejunkie4321Exactly

Except when it's not.

@@nathancook2852, hmmm. Is that an ad hominem fallacy, or an appeal to authority fallacy?

@@seanvogel8067 It's a "real scientists actually know what they are doing" common sense. Like: "I only let real surgeons cut me open"

@@seanvogel8067 no, it is not an appeal to anything. It is actually how societies work. You know, like when you have a health problem, you go to a specialist. If you don't know anything about auto repair and you have a major car problem, you take your vehicle to somebody who knows what they are doing. Scientists work in specialized fields. You can't just say they are wrong about this or that simply because what they discover conflicts with your beliefs.

@@travisbicklepopsicle , I agree with you about going to specialists, But the fact that they are specialists doesn’t mean they’re right all the time. It just means they are more likely to be right on a general basis in their specialty area. Your argument assumes that creation scientists are not real scientists. That is a misconception. It’s also important to distinguish between people who believe in creation versus creation scientists. There is also a difference between the data and the science, and on the other hand, the interpretation of the data. Since we’re using data collected in the present, it has to be interpreted. My final thought is that although I believe in young earth creation, I’m not sure some of the things being discussed require one worldview or another. Oh wait, one more thing to throw in there: consensus isn’t science.

@@seanvogel8067 Just calling someone a "creation scientist" implies that they are not real scientists, otherwise we would just call them scientists. What would make "creation scientists" different? By their own admission, they start with the "truth" of the Bible, and seek research that will confirm that. That's not real science.

It's called folding and it is proof both that the earth is very old as it is the result of very slow tectonic collisions.

@@StudentDad-mc3pu Student, the scientist in this video just disproved your opinion. Please rewind and watch again.

@@statutesofthelord No he didn't, he literally lied about the cause of folding!

@@StudentDad-mc3pu Student, you are just ignoring all the evidence that shows Evolution is a fairy-tale for grown-ups who wish to ignore the fact that God will judge them for how they lived this life he so lovingly created for them. Please repent, and start believing in your Creator - Jesus Christ, today.

Yes, you are correct about the first part. There was more that created the canyon formation over millions of years. 1 flood that lasted 100 or so days isn't able to leave even a centimetre of a mark on large rock layers. Instead if you listened closely enough in your geography classes, millions of years after the plateau has been carved out by the river, there were also periods were the water had frozen and thawed up, along with other weathering effects that the rock had taken affects from, leading to the canyon formations.

There'd also be uniformity and deposition throughout the canyons, if there was a global flood, but we don't see any evidence of that. Instead, the canyons exhibit complex patterns of erosion, where different layers of the canyons were shown to have eroded at different rates and through different ways, all of which indicates that there wasn't 1 flood that did this, but that there were different periods of erosion and deposition.

Also, don't you find it a bit strange that there are only a few canyon distributions around the world? Do theists expect that in a global event which should lead to multiple canyon formations, in their logic?

@@sentinel_nightcrawler We'll probably leave that to the geologists to explain why. I'm not a geologist but it could depend on the location's geology before the flood, there are some countries that mainly have granite rock formations and little sedimentary rock for example. The biblical flood wasn't just a flood that covered the earth, it was a catastrophic flood that formed mountains and valleys, changing the earth's topography - you have to study the Bible for the details. Dr Andrew's video also just gave a long explanation why the sedimentary layers at the Grand Canyon couldn't have taken millions of years to form if you have listened to the whole thing, the evidence doesn't explain our assumptions of millions of years.

@@blue-dc4hl oh, so you're trusting researchers who say that earth is billions of years old instead of creationist quacks, when you mention geologists? Sounds like a cop-out to your argument. I'm talking about other sedimentary rock formations that snelling hadn't taken into account. If there was a global flood which covered all of the sedimentary rock layers, why aren't there any canyons formed thereafter? Also the fact that snelling hadn't considered exactly what the composition of a rock layer would be had there been a flood, shows his lack of genuine research of rocks in general. I wonder if Snelling or Andrew have ever mentioned that if there ever was a global flood, then not only the grand canyons, but also all sedimentary layers would have uniform layers of erosion and distribution. But since the grand canyons exhibit complicated structures of erosion, we can look at what layer has eroded at which rate.

It’s pretty clear you’re not a rocket scientist or geologist either.

God makes you stupid. My advice is stay away from God.

Yes, that's exactly what happened. The main layers of the Canyon are Paleozoic, laid down over 300 million years. But there are gaps where sea level fell or the local land area rose above it, and there was erosion rather than deposition. These are represented by the breaks between different color layers. This may be a bit oversimplified, but that's the basic idea.

Evolutionists are now saying there was an ocean channel that ran from Texas through to Canada. Between that and their 2 million years of continuous rainfall they’re dancing dangerously close to the truth 😂

@@donjdanielsjr I'm not sure about Texas. But there were definitley ocean channels in the West at various times. The Grand Canyon layers were deposited on a continental shelf.

@@jockyoung4491what were the time periods?

​@@donjdanielsjr The lowest sedimentary layer is Cambrian, so around 500 million years ago. The highest part of the Canyon was over 200 million years ago, so everything above that has been eroded away (but the layers can still be seen to the north). The area was a continental shelf that was above or below sea level at various times.

If you like science, then why not listen to scientists when virtually all of them accept biological evolution as obvious?

@@jockyoung4491 so you speak for all scientists? you sir are an intellectual snob.

​@@jockyoung4491 That is an appeal to popularity. The evidence is there and just as There are scientists with PHDS and fancy degrees. Who argue for evolution There are scientist with the same phds and degrees. Who argue against it. It is up to you to do the research as to whose Evidence is the most profound in my opinion. It is obviously that of creation scientist.

Fool

@@MrAuskiwi101 the irony

It's not based on actual science.

@@markduell2468please disprove it with science not with a rhetoric.

@@tathyaanveshan3399 I don't know about the details, but his conclusions are definitely not scientific. There is nothing in the Grand Canyon that even remotely suggests a young Earth.

Except for the whole grand canyon itself. If it had taken millions of years the grand canyon simply would not exist. ​@@jockyoung4491

​@@jockyoung4491the Colorado River, as we know it regardless of time doesn't display the footprint it would for that length of time. What the shape of the canyons displays looks like a massive blasting force causing sudden catastrophic Chang Which then left behind the trickle that is the current Colorado in the bottom of the openings it busted and blasted first. We used to mess around with a sand table and a water hose in geology and ecology class in junior high school in the lab, I remember the stuff that would do .

Oh dear. What a shame you gave up the capacity for critical thought.

Even more interesting would be the formation of lead in Zircon crystals.

I like that theory 😊. I'm definitely not a geologist, but that idea is awesome ❤️

Before they knew what rainbows actually are 😂😂😂😂

There were other supercontinent cycles before Pangea

what we have now is not just Pangea with oceans. The continents are in different places

@@jockyoung4491 Yes a great flood and the movement of all the platelets to their positions today.

Great point. Assuming the forces currently at play (erosion, geothermal​, magnetic) it would take millions of years. It is possible that it could have been longer or shorter if there were other forces at play some point in the past, but without some extraterrestrial forces, and just using the forces we calculate today. Yes millions of years would be the assumed timeline @@nathancook2852

"Pangaea" occurred in the middle of the flood, when the continents had broken up and bounced together on the other side of the earth and then drifted away from each other afterwards again

There are a lot of other good points in the video that are not included in this summary - so you should listen to the Dr Andrew's full presentation

_Fossil records at the Grand Canyon show burrowing traces of trilobites and worms. How were the "footprints" of these organisms which would have been rapidly eroded preserved?_ How were these burrows and tracks both made and preserved in the middle of a raging Flood which supposedly deposited the very sediment the burrows and tracks are found in?

@@annieoaktree6774 They were made while these creatures were moving under the silt they were being covered with. The amount of water that covered the earth in only 40 days and nights reached a height of over 3 miles in that amount of time. It was over 17,000 feet high. The water pressure at that depth is staggering. That's about 425 feet of water level per day, or almost 18 feet of depth per hour. If you watch the videos of the Japanese tsunami he referred to, you'll see how destructive even a few feet of water in motion is. If you've ever gone to the bottom of the deep end of a pool, you can feel the pressure just that amount of water produces. Imagine the incredibly rapid pressure build-up of the amount of water that fell during the flood hours and days. That much water in motion would easily be able to carve out canyons and move vast amounts of material around.

Yep, a list of claims and supposition without evidence

@@markd3250 And that much water moving that fast would _eliminate_ any traces of such creatures, whether their remains or traces they left behind.

"Peers" from AIG, yes, not peers from actual scientists.

@@RenzunShark That's not how religion works.

dont you think they considered that 😂

​@@nathancook2852apparently it can only be science if the conclusions conform to the mainstream views huh?

At first they denied it because there were similar rocks outside the park and they didn't want him defacing a National Park for such a poor scientific hypothesis.

Cope

Atheists have no positions on anything. It’s the most intellectually lazy belief system of all. Yes, I know atheism is a “lack of belief”, insert eye roll here.

Praise YHWH!

What if the Bible isn't true?

​@@markduell2468*Jesus will make sure all you tares understand this at the Gate before sending you on your way.*

​@@markduell2468it is

The only thing you were saved from is rational thought.

@nathancook2852 Provide your resource to refute his claim.

_Our family did a fantastic creationist tour of the Grand Canyon and learned so much_ lol

@@richardgregory3684 what is wrong with you? did your daddy forget to bring condoms to the family reunion? lol

'It's obvious these layers were created in the great flood' Excellent, vigorous scientific work.. well done. A person does not need to be a geologist. All you need to do is visit the Grand Canyon on vacation and you'll learn everything you need to know. (Meant to say 'rigorous', but I'm sure it was vigorous as well)

I think they can grasp it, but they cannot allow themselves to be honest about this. It's part of the indoctrination of creationists to make them thing all of science is either its own religion, or ''atheist dogma''. They cannot be honest about this at all costs.

Obviously.

@@razark9 "measurably" 🤣

JockYoungLovesSatan 😂😂😂😂

@@SavedbyGraceAlone1962 Yes, the age of the Earth is measurable. Obviously. That's called science.

@@jockyoung4491 I understand why you feel the need to defend you god "science".

That's fine, but just don't claim science supports it when it doesn't. Christianity can still be true without misrepresenting science. Just stick to faith.

@@jockyoung4491 I believe the truth. Only your Creator can create you again.

@@jockyoung4491 The historical record shows that everyone spread out from Mesopotamia. Ancient history is essential for everyone to know, especially the sixteen original civilizations… from the sixteen grandsons of Noah. Learn ancient history before trying to learn science. 1. The first inhabitants of Italy (K) Tubal 2. Thracians (L) Tiras 3. Siberians (N) Meshek 4. East Asians (O) Magog 5. Medes (PQ) Madai 6.. Western Europeans (R) Gomer 7. Mediterranean Greek sea people (T) Javan 8. Hebrews and Arabic (IJ) Arphaxad 9. Elamites (H) Elam 10. Assyrians (G) Asshur 11. Arameans (F1) Aram 12. Lydians (F2) Lud 13. Cushites (AB, C) Cush 14. Egyptians (E3) Mitzrayim 15. Canaanites (E2, D) Canaan 16. Original North African Phoenicians (E1) Phut The D haplogroup descendants of Canaan migrated east through Tibet all the way to Japan. The C haplogroup descendants of Nimrod migrated to South Asia, the Pacific, Mongolia and all the way to the Americas along with Q haplogroup descendants of Madai ancestor of the Medes. The A maternal mtDNA haplogroup belonging to the N lineage accompanied the Q paternal haplogroup in the Americas. The C&D maternal haplogroups belong to the M lineage. The B maternal haplogroup seems to have crossed the Pacific Ocean. The Mediterranean paternal R1b and the maternal X2a also found in Galilee represent an Atlantic crossing of the Phoenicians in the days of King Solomon considering also the Mediterranean paternal haplogroups of T, G, I1, I2, J1, J2, E and B in addition to the R1b in Native American Populations. J1 and J2 is Arabs and Jews. (I1 is Dan, I2 is Asher) Of course there is the Cohen modal haplotype of J1 P58 which identifies the IJ lineage of Hebrews and Arabs that are descended from Arphaxad. J2 M172 is the descendants of the House of David and Solomon.

The historical record shows that everyone spread out from Mesopotamia. Ancient history is essential for everyone to know, especially the sixteen original civilizations… from the sixteen grandsons of Noah. Learn ancient history before trying to learn science. 1. The first inhabitants of Italy (K) Tubal 2. Thracians (L) Tiras 3. Siberians (N) Meshek 4. East Asians (O) Magog 5. Medes (PQ) Madai 6.. Western Europeans (R) Gomer 7. Mediterranean Greek sea people (T) Javan 8. Hebrews and Arabic (IJ) Arphaxad 9. Elamites (H) Elam 10. Assyrians (G) Asshur 11. Arameans (F1) Aram 12. Lydians (F2) Lud 13. Cushites (AB, C) Cush 14. Egyptians (E3) Mitzrayim 15. Canaanites (E2, D) Canaan 16. Original North African Phoenicians (E1) Phut The D haplogroup descendants of Canaan migrated east through Tibet all the way to Japan. The C haplogroup descendants of Nimrod migrated to South Asia, the Pacific, Mongolia and all the way to the Americas along with Q haplogroup descendants of Madai ancestor of the Medes. The A maternal mtDNA haplogroup belonging to the N lineage accompanied the Q paternal haplogroup in the Americas. The C&D maternal haplogroups belong to the M lineage. The B maternal haplogroup seems to have crossed the Pacific Ocean. The Mediterranean paternal R1b and the maternal X2a also found in Galilee represent an Atlantic crossing of the Phoenicians in the days of King Solomon considering also the Mediterranean paternal haplogroups of T, G, I1, I2, J1, J2, E and B in addition to the R1b in Native American Populations. J1 and J2 is Arabs and Jews. (I1 is Dan, I2 is Asher) Of course there is the Cohen modal haplotype of J1 P58 which identifies the IJ lineage of Hebrews and Arabs that are descended from Arphaxad. J2 M172 is the descendants of the House of David and Solomon.

@@nathancook2852 No

It's not just AIG. Creationists always (and probably intentionally) equate science with atheism. They don't undersatnd the difference between scence and faith.

Atheism depends completely on the idea of deep time and thus NEEDS geology to prove that the earth is old. What atheist believes the earth is a) eternal b) flat c) 6000 years old?

@@cosmictreason2242 Most atheist probably don't know much about science either way, just like most theists don't. But theism and atheism are about faith, and therefore have nothing to do with science. Time is not a NEED. Time is just a fact.

Yes. Dr. James Tour did a publish on the origin of life without bringing up God. And challenged any scientist to challenge him. If you are sincere in your question and curiosity of discovery regardless of the outcome. Check him out. You can look up his publish the origin of life by Dr. James Tour. It's very scientific. Way over my head. He is a Jew. He is a Christian. But he only uses science to explain stuff. He is a world renown scientist. Voted too 50 minds of our time. He is well respected in the science community. He is also a genius. I hope you find his work and I think you will respect what you read even if you come away with different opinions.

@@jockyoung4491you can't answer questions because your beliefs are all false

Obviously not. There is no "new evidence" of Jesus.

@@jockyoung4491 yet there has been “new evidence” of other stuff that’s been changing the Bible for centuries

Indeed....

The Bible clearly states that God (the Word Jesus Christ) created everything in six literal 24 hr days (Yom is the Hebrew word used). Exodus 10:1 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. God did not rest for millions or billions of years on day seven as an example for man to follow. God created Adam along with all land creatures on day six of the creation week. The Bible goes on to provide the genealogy of Adam to Jesus the Christ...giving the ages of those in between which we add up to determine the age of the Earth which is some 6000 years old. Sometime after day six of creation ...Adam sinned and the Bible states theat nature groaned. The Bible further states that the wages of sin is death. Adam's sin created the conditions for death. If you believe that the Earth is millions of years old them you put death before Adam came on the seen. Since Jesus came to redeem mankind from Adam's original sin, Jesus would not have had to come since death and disease existed before Adam came on the seen. Therefore the universe and the Earth being millions of years old is just not scriptural. Either you believe in the infallibility of God's preserved word or you believe in man's word. As for me and my house...we will serve the Lord.

Was Adam created as an infant or an adult? Now ask that same question about the earth.

There aren't even that many Christians total

@@cosmictreason2242 There are literally billions…?

@@Gideon-1611 nope