Wow I’m 13 I aspire to do that

@@freddieparrydrums I hope you can do it man!

@@katana4238 Thank you!

Your evil nation sucks ass

Tom, your Son is going to have to work extremely hard, but he’s going to have one of (if not the) the best jobs in the world. Well done to you for raising an intelligent, confident and competent young Lad👍😁

Well if you listen to most fighter pilots its not really living the life. The job is 99% of desk work. Endless amounts of it. And all the (useless) training not related to flying they have to do, and courses etc. So much additional shit that pilot retention is a major problem in US AF and the Navy.

@@rykehuss3435 bs

Its true. Look at CW Lemoine's videos about it. He is a former F-18 pilot

@@rykehuss3435 and REALLY long hours (in the USAF)

@@rykehuss3435 those thunderbirds guys live the life tho. The ones that do the air shows think they are rock stars.

they would probably cry of shame. and was Santos dumont the creator of aviation

Does anyone responding to this post, including the original person posting, have the ability to put a proper sentence together?

They’d be absolutely astonished by how far things have come since them

They would say," Wow! We never imagined human beings would be able to see so far away standing on our shoulders!"

@@rodrigoamoedo8523 You do know the wright brothers pitched their plane as a war machine right?

What take off it never show it in hover mode and flying away it’s always a short take off with a runway

@@shinichi6235 There’s only like 1 video of it doing that. But once again, it does it how you expect it to do it: Slowly angle the vectored thrust backwards until there’s enough air below the wings to lift it without the need for the other downward thrust surfaces and they shut off and the vectored thrust completely angles backwards. Pretty standard.

Ever heard of Yak 141 ?

but still jf17 10 gen stands first

Copy of Yak 41 😂😂😂 Russian built this in 1960.

id argue that they dont have to be lol. im sure they are but this things gots insane ai.

Just like top gun..

U r mistaken In these type of aircrafts majorly ststem is auto piloted and automatic

@@cahardiksingh6332 I'm sure you have to have mad skills regardless

@@realmejeremy of course, lots of train in the operation and handling of the F35 and its systems are needed. But the AI systems onboard do a lot of the heavy lifting for the pilot.

@Larry Bone r/woooosh

@@samsharghy5042 W

The jet isn't designed for a close fight,it's a long range engagement fighter.

And the dumbest, most insecure man alive is the commander in chief of that very Air Force. The irony...

Stephan Leo lol cry about it, all you fucking pussies are on every vid crying about your president.

@@coldnikka263 It's not my president, god forbid. As I said, the dumbest man alive.

Its from the Russians or soviet tech. Yak-141

@Derek Matthew That is not the issue, the current F45B is based on the Yak 141B not the harrier.

2 or 3 days ago A British F-35 fighter jet has crashed into the sea during a routine operation in the Mediterranean, the Ministry of Defence has said. £100m British fighter jet crashes into Mediterranean

I was a tech working with the engineers in 2007 its come real far

Too bad its production delays has made it go way over budget due to design flaws.

Same!!!

Fuck you to all who believe in this heap of garbage, lol ... sucker

@@FuckDatNiggaMichael F35 Crew Chief busting some myths imgur.com/gallery/c8a4stk Just read.

Rattler we couldn't be here this Sunday morning if brave men and women didn't fly around in these bombing village people on the other side of the world.

We americans need to get off our asses and start making shit like we used to.. we can dl better than this worthless pos

Well said :)

And that, my friend, is why the pilot's helmets are designed the way they are.

Seeing it in person up close is truly the experience of a lifetime!

try being here when they do their small "air show"

I guess stealthy doesn't mean quieter . Imagine living next to an air base of these jets ? Yikes !

but the F35 is so bad the Navy is already looking for a replacement

david peters bad in what ways?..David

@TyRaNno Technically not possible but loopholes to the rule may exist, those loopholes open up entire problems on their own so there is no guarantee we will ever be capable of FTL travel. Regardless I think we will be capable of near light speed by then, likely not for human interstellar travel yet but I'd expect some probes at least. In all honesty I expect there to be methods of propulsion that reach significant percentages of the speed of light in the coming decades so a probe to the nearest star might come even sooner, maybe constructed in about 50 years given funding. Assuming even 25% of speed of light is attainable a Proxima Centauri journey would take close to 17 years from our perspective, even smaller speeds may be feasible assuming the craft can survive longer and actually transmit data after that long. There are many compromises though because an RTG would have to make it that long or we would need an alternative power source. The engine itself will likely need power, several proposed methods of propulsion require electricity but for the ones that don't including various nuclear options this shouldn't be an issue while accelerating. If fission is an option for propulsion the reactor may be designed to function for power when not accelerating. Strontium90 RTGs could power spacecraft for decades but need much more mass to provide the power output of a shorter lived plutonium one which already produce fairly little, this isnt an ideal scenario when trying to save mass for interstellar travel. Communication is also important, the probe will have to be heavily automated to compensate for it taking over 4 years to send a message one way. Antenna and transmitters will have to be much stronger, or we can use lasers. These are all things I think we will figure out by the next century, super luminal travel if even indirectly possible I think is a bit further off.

or lamenting civilization’s demise..

@Tropic Lightning Well that could be a possible outcome as well..

@Tropic Lightning Beautiful.

@Andrew K no absolutely not

This is a vertical mod (VTOL)

ll-KYLIANGTA5-ll it’s a joke

@@MIDNIGHT_J996 brazillian's F-5 is better

@@MIDNIGHT_J996 Thanks captain obvious!

@N e x t, The f-5 is hideous! I bet the cockpit is super old to, old not cockpits without screens suck they are Impossible to understand!

and floor mats

A Bed, Fully functional toilet, a bath, a bar Also a cozy place for the dog......

Bluetooth speaker

A hundred million ? 😂😂😂 Try multiplying that figure by a hundred ... 🙄😏

Maybe even an aux cord

Bravo to Russian engineers at Yakovlev design Bureau that designed and built a lift fan system that allows F-35B to VTOL. bravo

30 ears ago...

Bravo to American engineers who designed and built the F$#uking Airplane. bahahahahah

The Us also invented the rubber penis, which is Tim's true field of expertise

How many times are you going to repeat that ignorant statement ?

I guess youve never seen the harrier before

Only one section of it is. I recognized Tripler as well. Most of the rest seems to be in the UK.

Got my first model of it about twenty years ago, doesn't look much different

F22 Raptor

It is a stunts plane nothing else. Wastage of money.

Harrier pilots die a lot

westathan Starting Really!!! At least you could have a whole fleet of Harriers for the price of one of these useless things. The Falkland’s war proved that.

Me too！😄

No

Dude you a San Diego resident? Saaaame

Lockead worker Friday...

The coolest part of KZfaq and maybe life itself is the A10.

A10 is cool but this plane could take the A10 out before it can even see the him.

@Don’t look at my profile pic Please I know i never said it was.

@Don’t look at my profile pic Please no im implying that the fighter is also pretty badass.

@Nub93 He didn't necessarily say that but even with the F35 not being built for plane to plane, it would still vastly outperform the a10 in that regard.

🤣🤣🤣 Русское "НЛО".Russian pilots are doing wonders! Kings of the sky ! Russian UFO. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bJlze7Nz37bWnKc.html

At first the F35 melted the flight decks. Try standing close to a F14 tomcat when it's being launched off the flight deck at night.

Is it true that the harrier when hovering primarily turns fuel into noise?

Both of these planes have completely different roles...

Seth Jansson then why are they retiring the A10 for the F35 if they have completely different roles?

It already has

@@census3370 the A-10 is not being retired for at least another 20 years. The Army is fighting to keep it, even if politicians and, ironically the Ait Force every now and then, tries to get rid of it.

Spell check maybe

The guys that own the Federal Reserve "Print" as much money as they want. They've "printed" Trillions upon Trillions of dollars and laundered it back to themselves, using their banks, just in the few past months.

@@imarothschild5332 Ok bot

Hey another person from dfw

yes it is. i hope these morons dont get it cancelled. its only slighty more expensive than other modern fighters

Lookind to the Skukoy 35 the best in the air BALLET PURE.Not f22 end f35 half f22 but in generla same bullshit like f22.

absolutely neutral opinion of course....though I doubt you worked on it, you wouldn't brag on YT if it was the case.

@@KahlieNiven bruh, they weren't bragging, just saying that it was a good plane

You don’t use KZfaq in China or North Korea lol

@@hansbuffet7965 Its from the Chinese and Korean ppl who live elsewhere :P

@@hansbuffet7965 It's a joke, captain obvious, lol.

@@hansbuffet7965 plenty of capable Chinese people looking at your comment laughing

I doubt seriously Russia is losing any sleep over this plane. Russian pilots were hovering their Sukhoi SU-57's long before this plane was designed.

Gold plate sniper I might say

It would never want to, but in real world situations in an all out war, dogfights would be unavoidable & inevitable.

Lol it only works in space.....

It's VTOL/STOL capabilities are depending on the version of the plane, basically F35A, F35B and F35C. Info is readily availabele throughout the internet.

Hi bro

The US sent men to the moon in 1969. :P

The Harrier was and is an engineering marvel, having said that it was very limited, as all VTAL aircraft are with respect to it's payload, range and speed, always was and will be one of the most important and capable air platforms ever divised

The Harrier had an inferior system for vertical flight making it prone to crashes. The competitor aircraft to the F-35 (boeing X-32 I think it was) used the Harriers style of vertical flight. The inherent safety risks were the same as with the harrier. Exhaust gas can be sucked back into the engine resulting in loss of thrust. Many harriers went down. The F-35 doesn't have this issue with its shaft driven central fan.

Great jet too... the Harrier. However what the US military is interested in is not necessarily only the battle capability, but the data it collects and uses in strategy. The software and system they have created is akin to alien technology (I am vehemently adamant it should never to be used on a mass scale because it's insane what they have made). Peace and freedom should be the only end of conflict. As a US citizen, I support the alien technology the military creates inasmuch as what they do supports this end. My vote and my voice will always be to promote peace and responsible prosperity. A military run by trained citizenry and not mercenaries is arguably more just and moral in its conscience. War is hell, and the intention I would hope for is that every person of character wants to make the world a better place through peace. Humanity is on its way to becoming a type II civilization which will scale the cosmos as long as it works to turn alleged enemies into rivals, rivals into allies, and allies into friends.

And will get smoked by the f35 in all aspects lmaooo

Thanks for watching!

thank your for commenting back!

oh yeah and i a sub to ur channel

I can do it at home! Step 1:buy a fighter jet Step 2:strap some smaller rotatable engine's in the jets belly Done! Easy

They’re all trained

apparently its capabilities are stealth and electronic targeting: beautiful it is not, it looks like a farmer built it

Beautifull traumas, death, terror destruction of vital infrastructure . Yeahhh! (And some things arrn't made directly but it helps in doing them and a Im talkinv of war itself)

It has nothing in common with the Yak other than vertical landing.

A much better description of the F-35 is a scaled down single engine F-22.

What an utterly ignorant statement.

lol it suks for the price

The front reminds me of a crow a real beat 👍

It is a actually SLOW beast that CAN'T FLY HIGH ALTITUDE and as of yet has NO COMBAT EXPERIENCE. Its cannon can't shoot straight and the whole program was plagued from errors and failures. I'm not saying its crap man, up until now it has done nothing to impress in terms of characteristics or performance in real combat zones (especially against ++4 Gen aircrafts like the Rafale, the Su 35, the Eurofighter or the J20) or against S-400 systems. Lets wait and see how it goes, but i believe its early to call this bird a triumph

WHAT..???WHAT A POS.

@@beaffteki ok I guess you are a fighter jet engineer.

Best Buy Black Friday sale starts at midnight, get there early to avoid the madness. good luck.