Mahindra DRDO showcased Armoured Vehicle better than Stryker

Рет қаралды 65,873

4 ай бұрын

Join this channel to get access to perks:
kzfaq.info/love/0SNcPlFneKhA9GPJt9vNZAjoin
To read more about the topic, please visit:
indiandefenseanalysis.wordpress.com/2024/02/25/mahindra-drdo-showcased-armoured-vehicle-better-than-stryker/
**WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN
Most of the pictures clip or BGM included in the Video
Belongs to their Respected Owners and we do not claim rights.
We are using them under following act:
UNDER SECTION 107 OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT 1976, ALLOWANCE IS MADE FOR "FAIR USE" FOR PURPOSES SUCH AS CRITICISM,
COMMENT, NEWS REPORTING, TEACHING, SCHOLARSHIP, AND RESEARCH. FAIR USE IS A USE PERMITTED BY COPYRIGHT STATUTE THAT MIGHT
OTHERWISE BE INFRINGING. NON-PROFIT, EDUCATIONAL OR PERSONAL USE TIPS THE BALANCE IN FAVOR OF FAIR USE.
Follow us on social media:
AnalysisDefense
indiandefenseanalysis.com/
==============THANKS FOR WATCHING!================
PLEASE LIKE SHARE & SUBSCRIBE: "INDIAN DEFENSE ANALYSIS"

Пікірлер: 85

@bennramnarine3395 4 ай бұрын

Very good coverage of these two AVs. The Mahindra platform appears to be one that the Armed Forces should procure in large numbers as soon as possible.

@karimullashaik7877 4 ай бұрын

😮😮

@rodneymiddleton1044 4 ай бұрын

Seems like a winner for India 650HP motor and can go in water plus upscale it with 12.7mm and 105mm would look good with some rockets too.

@billygibson2613 3 ай бұрын

Strong defence against terrisom allover the world 🌍 very good strong defence for safety reasons you all india

@Sonia_Godfray_Hindu 4 ай бұрын

Mahindra and tata two heart throbs of Atmanirbhar bharat ❤

@soulop8274 4 ай бұрын

Mahindra Tata bharat forge all three build great weapon for army

@Sonia_Godfray_Hindu 4 ай бұрын

@@soulop8274 exactly and kalyani too

@Useroi12 4 ай бұрын

@@Sonia_Godfray_Hinduthese r of no use in modern warfare...

@Sonia_Godfray_Hindu 4 ай бұрын

@@Useroi12 okay youube 4 star General

@HumkeshSharma 4 ай бұрын

@@Useroi12 bro you think INDIA and its neighbour has geography to support modern warfare absolutely not our region have the blood for blood geography

@475girish 3 ай бұрын

Defense Military Vehicles should get Advanced and more innovations is needed. only then a country can be ready from Threats from other Advanced Countries... ☝️

@Red.bulldozer3 4 ай бұрын

No point boasting of these vehicles better than others . But what is more important is quickly deploy them in large numbers at china frontier

@soulop8274 4 ай бұрын

Few are already deployed but not enough tata whap 100 assured means 100 will be inducted which a very small number. I think some more 100 Mahindra whap will be inducted

@Red.bulldozer3 4 ай бұрын

@@soulop8274 at least 1000 of these should be inducted.

@HumkeshSharma 4 ай бұрын

@@Red.bulldozer3 absolutely but then the opposition cries out for these veichles being not good our soldiers gets KIA because of shitty indian politics

@HumkeshSharma 4 ай бұрын

i know about these veichles and these wouldn't perform great in firefight because these are too boxy which means that every hit that is take it would lake the armour more lighter and if you see other APC they have more curvature too bounce the bullets off of the veichle

@Red.bulldozer3 4 ай бұрын

@@HumkeshSharma it is better than dont have anything

@user-sf3dj9is8h 4 ай бұрын

China has hundreds of these vehicles while we are still struggling to select what they need, better CRPF, BSF, ITBP buys these in large numbers.

@santoshpal6747 4 ай бұрын

It would more good with STANAG level 5 or level 6 protection system. Whapp can fitted with 105 mm mounted gun system and make lt light tank for war like situation.

@vardhamanist 4 ай бұрын

Le IA : Specification sab gaya baad mein, commission kitana hoga bolo warna niklo!

@AnirbanSarkar203 4 ай бұрын

Bro why doesn't DRDO equip the WHAP with RCWS & VSHORAD missiles ? If it's done then we won't need old 🇺🇸 strykers

@Warzone_warriors007 3 ай бұрын

India should purchase stryker,F16,swedish made. archer artellery and humvees from USA.

@thiagupillai 3 ай бұрын

Wonderful Video. Thanks for sharing this

@user-sf3dj9is8h 4 ай бұрын

Mahindra version looks and its specificatio is awsome.

@mohawk9 4 ай бұрын

Sir it's not 'jeera' or 'Cumins' engine as you pronounce it. It's pronounced as 'Kamins', spelt as Cummins engine, an American company based in Pune. Even Americans, mispronounce it as Cummings (like one madam Khalifa calls it)). Not making fun of anybody, just sharing information. I hope nobody feels offended about Madam Khalifa.

@AndrewLambert-wi8et 13 күн бұрын

STRYKER POWERED BY 350HP ENGINE AND NOT AMFIBIOUS. INDIA 600HP AND AMFIBIOUS. INDIA HAS BOTH TATAMOTORS AND MAHINDRA VEHICLES. THE STRYKER IS THE WORLD BEST ANYWAY.

@India20504 4 ай бұрын

Drdo+Tata And Mahindra🧡

@AKSinvi 4 ай бұрын

Army will evaluate timely availability and spares. Despite a world class product, Mahindra will struggle on both counts

@Seekay-oe3qz 3 ай бұрын

The lac area poses a different challenge & type of warfare than these large mechanized machines can offer , altitude means low oxygen so combustion is low , caves & crevices under snow can be a nightmare to any1 , so odds are both China & India will wage war on lower flat terrain over the border issue.

@redj59 4 ай бұрын

Stryker is combat proven and in production. Mahindra’s has never faced battle and is still a dream.

@VermaRajinder 4 ай бұрын

Unlikely --- these are cut paste jobs --- I doubt they are better than the Stryker but having said that GREAT BEGINNING !!!

@user-sx5uv8yr8o 4 ай бұрын

Indian indigenous vehicles with powerful engines need to be converted to ev or hydrogen engine to remain top of the line armoured.

@AnilKumar-pi1iw 4 ай бұрын

Very good 👍

@Blspeek-ag 4 ай бұрын

We need more automobile companies we just have two.

@rebelliouslord7646 4 ай бұрын

They are different category, Stryker is a fire support modular amored fighting vehicle.😅

@leelaaiyappa6277 3 ай бұрын

Super👍

@strato1917 4 ай бұрын

The back of this needs to be reinforced and reshaped, and needs a v shaped back as well .. not a flat one

@sbibankingguru 4 ай бұрын

Sir Engine USA We only be self reliant when engine is our country. Otherwise it is only assembly product.

@Seekay-oe3qz 3 ай бұрын

Does it have CCTV & thermal sensors to pick up enemy or terrorists..

@user-tw2hp6vd4c 3 ай бұрын

Jay Hind Sir

@manishmurudkar 3 ай бұрын

Front TWO axels are for turning...

@Austin-cx2xe 4 ай бұрын

The Stryker is was made in the 90s and is over 25 years old. It’s also been into battle, survived hundreds of IEDs and has armor that resists 14.5mm. But it’s a troop carrying vehicle, it’s not meant to engage IFVs or tanks. It’s meant to protect, deliver troops to combat and deliver supplies. We have the Bradley M2A4 for fighting. Which destroyed a T-90M, and India uses T-90S so shows that their weapons from Russia and the weapons they built are terrible. * Also the US Military has 4,187 Strykers. It would take India 100 years to produce that many of this junk

@theindiancountryball69 4 ай бұрын

Ah yes again a victim of Western propaganda:- First The T90 WASN'T DESTROYED it was disabled and you can even see in the video the tank was still on running condition even bmps can do that to a leopard of abrams and second this ISN'T JUNK just let me see when one 20 mm autocannon is aiming directly on you because this mahindra whap also has armor which can withstand 14.5 mm caliber rounds

@ak476able 4 ай бұрын

victim of propaganda! west is becoming the new soviet, it will be too late until they realise this.

@manh9105 4 ай бұрын

army will still want strykar

@defence3355 4 ай бұрын

Chandigarh lobby to be specific

@vetiarvind 4 ай бұрын

Wouldn't it be better if the soldiers manning the guns are not exposed?

@prkarthik9106 4 ай бұрын

Stryker was built 30 years ago.,..

@obaidop 4 ай бұрын

Is sa achi armed vehicle Pakistan na banai ha 8x8 6x6 4x4

@cosmoray9750 4 ай бұрын

This whap is a Copy and modernized version of OT-64 SKOT. India ordered 300 OT-64A (version fitted with BRDM-2 turret) ordered from Czechoslovakia in 1969 and delivered between 1971 and 1974.[

@Useroi12 4 ай бұрын

@@heheboy7808 when will baba's build non kinetic capabilities. F**k these vehicles...these r of no use

@marcamod7178 4 ай бұрын

if you have built a good vehicle, shouldn't be compared to another foreing veichle, which makes me doubt about said claim :)

@marcamod7178 4 ай бұрын

sorry, i forgot to add also that to be fair, the stryker isn't even the best one built in the world actually

@schnitzel_enjoyer 2 күн бұрын

Its always better than american vehicles but nobody buys it huh 🤣

@ebnhahn1993 4 ай бұрын

better than the stryker!!?? Arent we puhing it lol.

@DeclanMulqueen687 4 ай бұрын

I like tata whap more than this cause it has better front design and it looks unique if you compare it with american,russian,european,chinese and south east asian 8×8 designs.

@soulop8274 4 ай бұрын

Mahindra whap is even better than tata whap it's has best front design. Note - sharp Nose = better armor if u see Mahindra whap

@defence3355 4 ай бұрын

Mahindra whap is tougher

@funsungbangdu7606 4 ай бұрын

@@soulop8274 Stnag level 2, nah dont think so

@lion19557 4 ай бұрын

Tata sucks over pricey with low quality 👎

@ashish-nh5fp 4 ай бұрын

Badi top nahi lagai

@ushnishdas4596 4 ай бұрын

Why the improved version CBRN was not developed with the former developer, TATA? wastage of resources

@strato1917 4 ай бұрын

Stryker is shit, its IPC, not an IFV

@prasads.n9514 4 ай бұрын

What does DRDO do in this? Freeloader organization...

@rajvirsingh4558 3 ай бұрын

Copy hai

@Useroi12 4 ай бұрын

Bskkk build capabilities not these useless mfgff cars

@Sonia_Godfray_Hindu 4 ай бұрын

I'm sure your dad was a general and so you are

@Useroi12 4 ай бұрын

@@Sonia_Godfray_Hindu if u don't know anything about non kinetic capabilities of adversary u should get f**ked anywhere else , Don't make fun of educated people.

@Useroi12 4 ай бұрын

@@Sonia_Godfray_Hindu if u don't know anything about non kinetic capabilities of adversary u should get f**ked anywhere else , Don't make fun of educated people.