Is it possible to install chatgpt 4 in inmoov robot for making it more smart?

​@@universedocumentary8746pretty sure you cant install it because the database it uses is extremely big but it might be possible to access trough an internet connection but then again chatgpt is not open source so i dont think implementing it in a humanoid robot is not really possible yet

never too late. this project is open source and still in progress ! I am planning to do one 8 years after !

ayee me too! @@Yabbo06

Mohammad Mansour Great! I will be happy to see pictures of your clone on the InMoov site!

XAppleP1eX Go for it ;)

Yes I did . I used the kinect.

JC InfiniteWood You need a printer with a 12cm3 bed. Most small printers will be able to print the InMoov robot :)

gael langevin plus a LOT of time :)

+True Tech welll... I was talking about immediate obvious improvements. Full human level AI is quite a step further :)

+Fish Kungfu For info the hand of this robot was also the first Open Source 3D printed prosthetic available, Robots can be used to help us in many ways, just like electricity, computers or internet it's a tool for our everyday life.

+gael langevin I totally agree! You have created a beautiful robot. I'm looking forward to your progression with it.

right tho... we need peace :)) come2gether lol

How much would cost in order to assemble the same human body robot as on video?

gavin harison Thanks. I am working on the design of the legs and the different options for getting them available for the community.

@@hairygael this is owesome.

its about 2000 he said. but it doesnt walk.

snoopysn100 No, InMoov is running on a 6 volt battery.

gael langevin that's better than some others I've seen, all that motion. Nice and fast on a 6 V battery, real good

+captainrex913 load the stl file into slicer, then it will be able to tell you the weight / length of filament required.

+Ryan Bone 1500USD more or less depending on the materials you get.

amen. the whole thing. i'm into it.

It won't matter that people prefer a hard days work if robotic laboratory is cheaper. And universal basic income is an inevitability at this point. Also, communism? Wtf are you talking about? If we had the technology, any business man would profit by putting into play what I just described.

Pipe dream? How many inventions started with the "Pipe Dream?" The airplane, landing on the moon, exploring the ocean depths, the Artifical heart, and more. No, my friend, it is people like you who have opposed exploration and discovery, and yet, benefit with it in the end. Robots taking over the world is SF, but robots doing the exploring and dangerous tasks that help spare human injuries can only benefit humanity in the long run.

My breath smells like I'm talking out of my ass? That's laughable. Especially since you sound like a singulatarian. Machines wont evolve to decide whats best for humans. Human intelligence is the product of billions of years of evolution. Artificially intelligent machines would still need millions of years to select out basic logical fallacies. There's a reason why it took billions of years for life to get this far. Also this statement is both wrong and ill informed. "A bored human can soon develop into a dangerous human." Did you know that the earliest civilizations would not have developed without staple foods? Rice, corn, wheat. These high carb foods radically reduced the work load of early man freeing up time for research and technological development. Studies on south Asian cultures have shown that communities that did not develop these cash crops did not have the free time to develop into productive, high population communities. The same will apply to automation. Free time = time to innovate. Robotics should replace human labor where humanly possible. Robotic construction, robotic farming, and robotic medical professionals will allow cheap housing and food and medical attention to be available anywhere on the planet, regardless of persons education. These innovations would radically increase the quality of life. Fear of not having a purpose has nothing to do with it. Also, your race analogy? Wtf was the point of that? More singulatarian B.S I assume. Automation will take jobs, but the human race as a whole will be better off in the long run. Automation separates the labor to mouths to feed ratio. There is a maximum GDP per capita that can be achieved due to this ratio. The industrial era decreased this ratio allowing the average GDP per capita to increase, increasing the quality of life for people across the board. But automated labor separates those two. In today's world its impossible to live a first world lifestyle while also producing all the goods required for ones survival by ones self. If you grow your own food, then its cheaper to sell the surplus and buy clothes off the market then to make your own clothes too. There's not enough time in the day to grow your own food, make your own clothes, build your own house, etc. That's what the market it for, and ultimate why goods cost as much as they do. Cost is a measure of efficiency. Human labor is still a factor in that equation, and there are always going to be people on the bottom performing grunt work and getting paid next to nothing for it because the economy simply can't accommodate for them. Separating the labor to mouths to feed ratio means that no matter how many mouths we have, we can build more machines to make up for the surplus labor required. That means if properly managed, we can all live like kings. The value of our dollar goes up, despite the work required to maintain that dollar going down. Collectively we become more efficient. As long as we look out for each other, everyone benefits. Oh, and as someone who has a little knowledge of biochemistry, forget about singularitarianism. Its pseudoscience. Consciousness will never be downloaded, consciousness is structural, not programming. Almost all of the assertions made by singularitarianism are turn of the century science fiction, and are firmly debunked by modern neuroscience. The singulatarian concept of artificial intelligence is no different from anthropomorphosis, just like the greeks did with the elements. Emotions are acquired adaptations. They're not something that can spontaneously emerge.

Computers don't evolve, Robert Weiss. They're designed to perform specific functions. And don't project your problems onto me. All you've done is refute perceived negative connotations. You haven't inquired into my argument or personal character, or supported any of your statements. So how would you know?