Removing carbon is incredibly costly and inefficient. This is a distraction. We need to NOT emit CO2 in the first place.
@DreadedLad885 ай бұрын
What have you done to help, besides typing? God, I can't stand you internet people.
@galihad19805 ай бұрын
It takes the same amount of energy to sequester co2 as we got from feeing it.
@pohateos93945 ай бұрын
It takes considerably less energy to sequester carbon than we get from it... it takes approximately 1,200 kilowatt hours to sequester 1 ton of carbon while it takes about 5,171 kilowatt hours to produce 1 ton of carbon. The main issue is that sequestering carbon is not profitable while creating carbon is... if there was a way to monetize carbon seqestering, we would magically solve global warming.
@stanhutcheson85855 ай бұрын
Why not just plant trees? Scam
@YoNightmare76 күн бұрын
Trees are much less efficient and require more space, and cost more to plant than do build a carbon capture facility
@viaaustralia53885 ай бұрын
Yeah- the machine requires energy to function- how is this for an idea- PLANT TREE'S. You know those things that have been around for a billion years that take CO2 from the atmosphere and produce oxygen.
@rickallen19085 ай бұрын
2/3 of photosynthesis occurs in earth's rain forests. Currently the rain forests are being eliminated at the rate of 10,000 acres per day. At that rate rain forests won't exist in 150 years. Are human lungs going need 2/3 less oxygen by then? Like most you only see what's happening today, so it can't be something that will occur tomorrow. To make it easy. It's not just one thing that's going on today that will eventually make the planet uninhabitable. It's several things at once.
@michaelperea9245 ай бұрын
Why not just plant more trees?
@yancgc50984 ай бұрын
Trees are just not efficient as a form of carbon capture, they take too much space for them to make a difference and they emit CO2 during the night. Carbon capture and storage tech is necessary at this point.
@topaz28215 ай бұрын
This is a legitimately good idea, especially if paired with green energy.
@pohateos93945 ай бұрын
I mean, that is cool, but is it really feasible to build 10 million of these plants across the globe? Sounds to me like the idea needs to improved dramatically before widespread use. I lime the idea though but there has to be a better way.... like maybe planting more trees and stopping large-scale deforestation
@YoNightmare76 күн бұрын
Planting trees is much more expensive. This is a nascent industry and will become more efficient and cheaper with time like any other industry
@ameer.thelion5 ай бұрын
Calling bs
@min2oly5 ай бұрын
How do U get the LIME... generate carbon... so what's the NET??? what a scam!!!
@flyingsausage65525 ай бұрын
It’s called trees stop cutting forests down and other stupidity we might be okay
@stevesquare16994 ай бұрын
The lens on their glasses has polymer in the glasses which is a petroleum product
@AnotherYTcreator5 ай бұрын
I'm not a scientist but trees do this for free?
@YoNightmare76 күн бұрын
For the same cost, trees are much less efficient
@stevesquare16994 ай бұрын
So they are trying to remove Carbon from atmosphere but are wearing plastic hard hats made from oil. Polyester jacket and slacks all made from petroleum products (oil)
@louis-alexandregregoire-sa53615 ай бұрын
If this machine is potent solution: scientist please inform us.
@1548065 ай бұрын
If this works, in theory, it's a great first step... but i won't be alive for it to matter to me that much...
@IGOBYTHENAMELOVE5 ай бұрын
Send it to space
@pyrotechnic3s5 ай бұрын
if only i had this in factorio
@slushylemming1321Ай бұрын
Just don't burn down forests or live in desserts.
@darrellh10845 ай бұрын
...👍🏾🙏👍🏾✨✨✨😳✨✨✨👍🏾🙏👍🏾...
@Dick-Pump5 ай бұрын
Killer growth plan…only 5 million plants left to build