Yes. It should have been dropped anyway based on Bruen

Yeah, at least DJT is an actual public figure and politician. Fair game.

@@brendasnow8255Corrupt

No, because David Weiss was nominated by a President and was then Senate approved, Jack Smith wasn't.

WRONG! Jack Smith was not legally appointed. GET OVER IT!

​​@ClassicFIHD then neither was anything against Hunter

And joe biden should have been charged. If you don't believe he should over his documents you all show how msm has destroyed your brain

@@ClassicFIHDyou seem to have missed the right from wrong lesson usually taught at age 5~~were you out sick during those lessons ~~ you see you are part of the problem ~~ propping up Trump at every juncture ~~ it has caused a lot of resentment ~~you refuse for Trump to be accountable for nothing ~~ sorry that’s just not normal!!

@@BKope Hunter's gun chargers had nothing to do with a special council!

Have you listened to clip? Perhaps appoint a special counsel in compliance with the Constitution of the United States.

You watch too much MSNBC and CNN.

@@jonathandnicholson Have you watched the trial? Perhaps put forth a competent and unbiased judge who oversees a speedy trial in compliance with the Constitution of the United States.

@@teotroniaohhh now you worry about unbiased judge, but in Trumps case you dont care if the judge is biased right?😂😅😅😅

ALL FEDERAL JUDGES ARE APPOINTED BY SOMEBODY SO BY THAT STATEMENT YOU THINK WHICH PARTY THAT APPOINTED A JUDGE THAT THEY SHOULD RULE EITHER DEM OR GOP

JOE??

Biden's weren't even locked up, nor taken while he was the President. Hilary deliberately destroyed evidence in her classified document case. So tell me again, whose not above the law?

Biden did the same thing and shared his docs with a book writer.

You didn’t think it was a joke when you agreed with it.

​@@DoggosAndJiuJitsuexactly

@@DoggosAndJiuJitsu You mean when there was no bald-faced corruption?

@@danieliusblackius1130 He was President. He can legally do it. You didn’t seem to care when Joe did the same but it was illegal.

​@@danieliusblackius1130 when it's the outcome you wanted, the system works and anyone who questions it is a threat to democracy trying to undermine law and order. when it's not what you wanted, it's injustice and corruption. derek chauvin and george zimmerman

So it's OK Biden got away with it lol

The Heritage Foundation.

trump's defense team judge!

It won’t be refilled This case is over

​@@GoodTV285 You're so wrong

If any of that was her legitimate reasoning then there’s a procedure for that which is to recuse herself.

That was my initial thought. She gets out of having to be the bad guy to the person that put her there, and make it look good for him at the same time. No one has had issue with this for 30 years at this point.

How so,

Only Trump is above the law 🙄

@CinePhil101 you misspelled Biden, Biden should have been charged when he had classified information Biden had no legal right to have him president Trump did

The democrats have proven this.

​@@fgang781 Special prosecutors and special counsel are completely constitutional and have been used in many trials.

Weaponisation of the Supreme Court and significant corruption

So it's OK for Biden to get away with it ?

Are you don't with the rant

So angry that a BS case was dismissed

@@emmanuelmendoza9852 I see you suffer from an inability to think critically. Tell me, what were your thoughts when the Biden documents case was not brought despite evidence? Did you not also think it was disgusting he wasn't held accountable?

The photo of the “top secret” documents that was shown was faked and leaked by the FBI

For some odd reason, you think the judges will isn’t law, but the judge has to decide whether the case has legal grounds, and the way it was done, and from the former vice president now sitting president has broken the same laws, and many other ex presidents have lapses in storage! The way they stormed trumps home, is why this case is trash! STOP 🛑 LYING

No, they do not. Those that Biden and Mike Pence had were accidentally packed by staffers, plus there were very few, and Biden and Pence returned them.

@@GoldenpaydirtReviews You’re wrong. It’s crazy how far Trumpers will go to try to clean up his messes. Just Google it. They haven’t. He’s the first president to be impeached twice, first to incite an insurrection, first to be indicted in several different cases. A loser. A total loser.

Name calling at someone you know nothing about. Really? You're why the kid lost his life trying to assassinate President Trump. Can you not see, that when you villify it gives someone with an even smaller mind than yours ammunition?

WOW! SMH!

Of course President Biden and Hunter Biden are TOTALLY innocent!! Both are multi millionaires.

You meant those 3 NYC corrupt Judges.

Cry baby 👶

Far from over.

@@ThomasMarolf-bo6lg It’s been over. Indictments, charges, allegations, law suits, convictions and impeachments mean nothing. He will never go to jail. What real consequences has he suffered?

Tell me that you are nazis without telling me that you are nazis

@@pisces363 The justice system has not worked properly since the fix was in however if Trump loses in November this case as well as all the others will be tried & Trump will lose.

@@ThomasMarolf-bo6lg I’m not so sure that he’s going to lose in November. I hope he does, but; it’s a toss up. I find it interesting that you say “the fix is in”. How can you say that and expect justice to prevail?

Do you guys not read the news? They tried to get existing prosecutors to do this and they would not take it because it is not founded in law. That's why they had to go find someone that hates trump enough to sacrifice their legal reputation, or in his case, already had a crappy legal reputation.

For what reason did Attorney General Merrick Garland illegitimately appoint a special counsel? What has changed since?

Canon might "randomly" be assigned again

Only the fact that it would demonstrate without any doubt he is complicit with the White House.

The election in November, Jack Smith's appointment was rushed through because they had a time limit to get this case to court before the election.

Ha ha ha he can’t put them on

He would if he could remember he has a brain !!!

​@DeplorableStudmuffin-s5v actually on my way to BC rn. Mums from Montréal!

@@cosmiccowboy7764 trump wears gloves for toddlers

Lol 😂 what are your feelings on Biden getting away with his illegal classified document case

Doesn't God also look after his own? How can you tell the difference?

@@JamesThomas-dn6eeLOL 🤣what are your feelings on the biden documents case also having a special counsel robert hur to be exact who was also appointed by merrick garland

Project 2025 .

We'll be desperately wishing for the Handmaid's Tale in a few years.

What does Project 2025 do?

@@cd5642 It gives the federal government power to do whatever they choose.

Their church calls us demons. I heard the pastor shout it from the pulpit.

No. He doesn’t own the documents. We do, and they are legally supposed to be kept in the National Archives. No, he didn’t have a right to take them. The judge isn’t saying that.

But a senator that took classified documents and kept them in boxes next to his fossil fuel burning Corvette isn’t a crime?

​@@GotoHerewell, now to be fair...he's not mentally competent to stand trial. 😂

We became a banana republic when the leftists decided to start using lawfare as a political tool.

@@julesbower762 Well, he sort of tried. Sent him to military school after he was caught breaking into neighbors’ homes.

He actually claims it is lol

wait and see

Yes

In the case of Hunter, the prosecutor was already a confirmed United States Prosecutor. Jack was brought in from the outside.

​@@reverendtobiasfinally someone smart

Poor fella, you must have dementia.

Nope. None.

Those documents don’t belong to the president, and when he took them, he wasn’t president, either. They belong to the citizens of the U.S.A., and are kept in the National Archives, where they are kept safe.

Not in a binding sense, but Judge Chutkan would have to give an opinion which explains her decision.

The legal cases are dead on arrival.

That sounds ridiculous. There is no “identical case.” Biden’s staff mistakenly mixed some into files that weren’t government files, then later packed them up to send to him. There were 23, I think? Biden apologized, Trump lied. Remember how Trump kept the “love letter” from Kim Jong Un, because he thought it was personal correspondence, despite it being official.

No. Pence and Biden having what amounted to a handful of classified documents is not at all equivalent. Both of them handed them over as soon as the document were discovered/requested, and granted full, immediate access to the premises. Trump, in contrast, had hundreds, if not thousands of classified documents and repeatedly denied having them, refused to turn them over, and enlisted lies and subterfuge to retain them. Think of this in terms of a traffic violation. Pence and Biden ran a stop sign, but when immediately complied when pulled over and no other violations were found. Trump not only blew past the stop sign, but forced the police to give chase at high speed for many miles, only stopping because of being forced to do so.

The problem was he didn’t want to give them back. Every other president gave them back. Even Biden.

Yes you’re right but not every president was asked for over a YEAR to return them and when was questioned he told staffers to grab the boxes and move them! The dismal of this case and your lack of knowledge is destroying America

@@pisces363 That is the false Media narrative- May 2021 The National Archives and Records Administration, also known as NARA, emails Trump's lawyers, notifying them that some two dozen boxes of original records were not turned over, according to The Washington Post. December 2021 A Trump representative tells the National Archives "that they had located some records," according to a statement published later by the National Archives. Mid-January 2022 The National Archives retrieves 15 boxes of presidential records from Trump's estate. The nonpartisan presidential records agency said it "identified items marked as classified national security information, up to the level of Top Secret and including Sensitive Compartmented Information and Special Access Program materials" and sought permission to alert the FBI. February 8, 2022 The National Archives issues a public statement saying it is still searching for more of Trump's presidential records, one day after The Washington Post reported the boxes were retrieved from Florida. February 10, 2022 U.S. House of Representatives Oversight Committee announces an investigation into Trump's handling of the documents, later expanding its probe in a February 24 letter to the agency. The New York Times reports White House staff periodically found clumps of documents clogging White House toilets, an accusation Trump has said is false. Reporter Maggie Haberman later releases photos of some of the alleged found documents.

@@pisces363 Not true, he worked with them to give them what they wanted. At least they weren't all piled in a garage like Biden's. Of course, Biden was to feeble to stand trial, ha

Facts. The Corrupt judge just Cooked Donald Trumps GOOSE! Here is WHY? She NEVER RULED on Many Motions in the case. By NOT RULING the Next Judge CAN RULE on Those Motions!😳😂😂 fact. So she messed up😂

All Trumps case will end up in appeal at the highest court of the land U.S. Supreme Court of Justice. Democrats do not have a chance to win any case there, none.

Biden did and got away with it. FYI, Trump was President, just like Bill Clinton was. Dohhhhh!

You know better soldier.

No because you were never President and never had authority to declassify documents.

yes, as long as u hide it in your personal bathroom next to the toilet

@@TotalTomoko100%! 😂

Agreed! This is a travesty and a national shame to America

Because you don't understand law, you're upset.?

Then you should be upset biden never got charged

@@johnmilam3862 Yes! I don't believe the law is being interpreted and applied properly.

@@gold_ram_5.780 Why? Biden never obstructed justice.

Well, Special Counsel Robert Hur, who was also appointed by AG Merrick Garland, said there wasn't sufficient evidence to bring any charges against Joe Biden. So that's that.

The charge was obstructing their return etc

@@Vness-yt4nm And, wouldn’t have deliberately done that, because he’s a decent person who respects the constitution and the law.

He doesn't have them and won't get them back. They're property of the federal government.

No.

No wonder.)))

It's a comedy show.

It will be appealed.

Maybe it’s because we understand what is really happening, unlike Republicans that are living with their heads in the sand. This Conversation will continue with a higher court. Trump was not President when this indictment was issued. He is not above the law.

Losing their mind just like Biden

And the prosecutor was appointed correctly

He was legally appointed 😅😅😅

ONLY trump IS ABOVE THE LAW!!!

He was prosecuting as a US Attorney held over from the Trump adminsitration. I believe he was later appointed special counsel.

@@jeremiahchamberlin4499 Right. Anyone who would vote for such a terrible man doesn’t care what he does.

down goes jurisprudence on a seal

If Trump has to go to trial for this so does biden. Considering biden knowingly had documents he shouldn't have had didn't has presidential records act and documents spread all over. Simple fact bidens case was worse. If a bank rober robes a bank then hands the money back he won't be let off. Wake up

Very objective response. Are you a lawyer?

By throwing it out though, is she preventing its validity from being addressed ever again in any different sort of way?

We get all of OUR Florida judges from, "trump~mart!"

Jack Smith was never a legitimate prosecutor in this case. Nothing else matters.

you'll be okay Buttercup

Cause she didn't need to ... try harder

​@@johnnyappleseed_🤣🤣🤣

@@stevenchesbrough9881 So who paid for Rober Muller's investigation of Hillary Clinton and do Congress appropriate those funds?

Didn't biden get off for stealing documents when he was a senator and couldn't take documents home or anywhere without stealing them

Go follow some actual legal channels so you don't get misled again. These "experts" are clueless. Garland and Jack both knew this was coming, because it's the law. Garland couldn't get any existing prosecutor to do this case because they actually care about their legal reputation. Jack already had a crappy one, so he could prosecute a case he knew he'd either lose at the lower court or lose on appeal because he hates trump.

Yes, the fix appears to be in.

Joe biden. Since he wasn't charged for all his documents obviously

And that person is . . . Merrick Garland.

Division

Because Trump is known for appointing unqualified people. So it gives good context.

Because she was. There not mentioning that at the time she was rated unqualified.

Because she was appointed by Trump and has been scolded twice already by the appellate court for horrifically stepping outside of her bounds as a judge on the side of Trump/the defendant.

Because it's true. She was. Trump personally picked her and bragged about being immune once the GOP senate at the time confirmed her, because she was placed in the Mar a lago district. So yes, she was appointed by Trump, to protect Trump, and has done exactly that.