INTEL & AMD both lied! 👉REAL WORLD power consumption is MESSED UP

  Рет қаралды 117,578

Tech Notice

Tech Notice

Күн бұрын

Intel & AMD have both 'lied' about their real world power consumption. Here's the Truth:
Sponsored Message:
Whokeys 25% discount code : TN20
Windows 10 Pro OEM Key ($17): biitt.ly/nEliC
Windows 10 Home OEM Key ($14): biitt.ly/e7F0u
Office 2019 Pro Plus key ($42): biitt.ly/gnDE5
Windows 10 Pro OEM + Office 2019 Pro Plus Key Pack ($61): biitt.ly/BSpz2
Buy Intel CPUs here:
🔵 Intel i5 12600k geni.us/i512600k
🔵 Intel i7 12700k geni.us/ii712700k
🔵 Intel i9 12900k geni.us/i912900k
🔵 Intel i9 12900ks geni.us/i912900KS
🔵 Intel i7 13700k Here: geni.us/i713700k
🔵 Intel i5 13600k here: geni.us/i513600k
🔵 Intel i7 13700k here: geni.us/i713700k
Buy AMD CPUs here:
🔴 Ryzen 9 7900x geni.us/7900x
🔴 Ryzen 7950x here: geni.us/7950x
🔴 Ryzen 7700x here: geni.us/7700x
🔴 Ryzen 7600x here: geni.us/7600x
🟦 Intel 12th & 13th Gen testbench:
Motherboard: geni.us/z690ProArt [Asus Z690 ProArt Creator]
RAM: geni.us/b7Sfs [Kingston Fury Beast 5200MT/s]
Cooler: geni.us/cnVpbO [Phanteks Glacier One 360MP]
Cooler Fans: geni.us/cRsu3 [Phanteks T30]
OS SSD: geni.us/eRVfwYj [Samsung 980 Pro 1TB]
Project Drive: geni.us/y75Sg [Samsung 980 Pro 2TB]
PSU: geni.us/qs5Asp6 [Deepcool PQ1000m]
GPU: geni.us/tuf3090 [Asus TUF RTX3090]
🟥 Ryzen 7000 Testbench:
Motherboard: geni.us/x670eProArt [ASUS X670e ProArt]
RAM: geni.us/b7Sfs [Kingston Fury Beast 5200MT/s]
Cooler: geni.us/StrixLCII360 [ROG Strix LC ii 360]
Cooler Fans: geni.us/cRsu3 [Phanteks T30]
OS SSD: geni.us/Hmf9MA [Teamgroup Cardea C440 1TB]
Project Drive: geni.us/2TBm480 [MSI m480 Spatium 2TB]
PSU: geni.us/yZC1Nk [Corsair hx1000]
GPU: geni.us/tuf3090 [Asus TUF RTX3090]
👇❗️PC Builds for Creators [Latest]❗️👇
➡️ $750 BB4B (Best-Bang-For-Buck) PC geni.us/750-1300BB4B
➡️ $1500 BB4B Creator PC geni.us/1500-2300BB4B
➡️ $2500 BB4B Creator PC geni.us/2500-3500BB4B
➡️ $4000 BB4B Creator PC geni.us/4000-5kBB4B
Want me to check out some tech or interested in collaborating?
📩 email me: thetechnotice@gmail.com
FB: / thetechnotice
IG: @thetechnotice
#intelVSamd #powerconsumption #efficiency
Video produced by Lauri Pesur
Edited by Sam Ruddick
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GEAR USED IN THIS VIDEO:
[All 'geni.us' links below redirect to Amazon (or some other Online stores) and may earn commissions]
AUDIO:
-The Recorder + Mic I Use: geni.us/tscmdr-10l
-Shotgun Mic I Use: geni.us/T35T
-My Main Headphones [CHEAP]: geni.us/dzv7Q
-My Main Headphones 2.0 [NOT CHEAP]: geni.us/as7q9v
VIDEO:
-A-roll Camera: geni.us/NvnoA
-Lens for A cam: geni.us/J009I
-B-Roll Camera: geni.us/wVlF8J
-Top Down Cam: geni.us/56576C
-Main Bokeh Lens 4 Sony: geni.us/k09oA
-The Wide Angle beast w OS: geni.us/9KfCwy
LIGHTS:
-Main Fill Light: geni.us/qTbE
-Hair & RGB Lights I use: geni.us/TdY1
-RGB Tube Wall Light Behind me: geni.us/96gWdz8
-The Fire effect light: geni.us/GX5KA
OTHER:
-Favourite camera Monitor w LUT: geni.us/tecUD
-I get my music here:
▶Get 2 Months for FREE when joining Artlist/Artgrid below◀
Music & SFX Licensing Site: geni.us/TNartlist
Stock Footage Site: geni.us/TNartgrid
DISCLAIMER: I have to state that some of the links on this channel are affiliate links which means by clicking on them and purchasing the items I get a small commission. I'm part of an Amazon Affiliate and earn revenue from qualifying purchases. Using the provided links does NOT change the price for you.
⏲️
0:00 Intro
0:50 Sponsored Segment
1:13 I need to explain something.
1:20 1. 100% CPU utilisation vs Real Workflow
2:45 2. Why 100% Power Draw is STILL useful!
4:22 3. Idle Power Draw on Intel vs AMD
5:25 4. Which Workflow [Programs] were tested?
6:31 4.1 Why did I test these Programs?
7:39 5. How was Testing done?
9:00 Important NOTE
9:13 Test Results: Explanation
11:02 Adobe Premiere Pro
12:53 Adobe Photoshop
14:06 Adobe Lightroom Classic
15:21 The Yearly Cost of CPU Usages
17:07 IMPORTANT Note on Yearly Cost! Idle vs Under Load
18:11 Hardware vs Software monitoring
19:32 Testing the Full PC system from the wall
20:29 13900k vs 7950x From the Wall Power Efficiency
21:48 The Conclusion - Who's lied?
23:32 Best PC to build as a Creator

Пікірлер: 895
@thescarletcars
@thescarletcars Жыл бұрын
I've searched the entire internet for idle power usage stats and found nothing as comprehensive as this. Finally, I can make a decision thanks to you.
@theTechNotice
@theTechNotice Жыл бұрын
👍
@excelsiusprime
@excelsiusprime Жыл бұрын
True. I need this stat for 3D version.
@Saimeigaming
@Saimeigaming Жыл бұрын
What was your decision btw ?
@thescarletcars
@thescarletcars Жыл бұрын
@@Saimeigaming went wth the 13700k with a 4070ti
@adithyadanaj9768
@adithyadanaj9768 11 ай бұрын
​@@thescarletcarswhich would you choose between i5 12500h and ryzen 7 6800h for a laptop?
@JH_1981
@JH_1981 Жыл бұрын
So nice to see reviews based on actual work instead of just gaming.
@Sakosaga
@Sakosaga Жыл бұрын
You must not be watching good tech channels because the better ones do gaming and real world work loads. If you work in the enterprise sector alot of them are locked into Intel because some of the software doesn't work with AMD.
@w04h
@w04h Жыл бұрын
@@Sakosaga The problem is that most reputable channels use power viruses or heavy renders to measure power consumption and then base the entire review of off that which is simply misleading because many heavily multithreaded apps still don't fully utilize given cpu. And this is true even for gpus.
@Sakosaga
@Sakosaga Жыл бұрын
@@w04h even if it's the case of alot of applications that are older, may use just 1 or 2 primary cores. You're going to still end in a similar situation. Remember there was a time when Intel's turbo boost did only push 1 or 2 of it's cores depending on the platform because they took in too much power when you would try to boost all of them instead still leading to a power draw that was still higher. If you effectively remove the turbo boost function from them, sure they'll consume far less power but these CPUs are designed to be pushed hard right Dealing with massive amounts of heat. That's why the Turbo boost technology has changed so much. Also alot of reputable reviewers that I watch use super old and new testing for benchmarks and when they measure power draw they do it from the application that will measure what stretches the most from the CPU and it's idle consumption. Most large scale businesses won't be using these chips as an option and this is coming from someone who has spoken with venders such as HP , Lenovo , etc usually when your business is under a contract with them, they typically won't send you the newest hardware for a business to use because stability, compatibility, and cost. In a situation where you have people who render movies, make video games, etc. They're most likely using a platform such as AMD thread ripper or Epyc servers because of the need for more CPU power for heavy data transfers which can take an insane amount of CPU power to just transfer files. These are consumer chips and most of the sales from these things aren't going to be used for little things like typing emails and only watching KZfaq, etc, those consumers would most likely find a laptop that has a decent amount of power that isn't anywhere near a 13900k's power. So I can understand the argument but in terms of real world it isn't going to be the same or used that way that's why people don't test these things like this, it's for the targeted audience of who these are for or worst case scenario of these chips.
@Andytlp
@Andytlp Жыл бұрын
Intel is more efficient in these productivity apps. Either due to acceleration or better optimization by intel or the app developers. So if you work and game go intel, if you only game you might want to look at amd only. In gaming on avg amd is about 30% more efficient. Cpus are pretty efficient these days so it wont matter much anyway. Laptops on the other hand amd is the only choice if you aim to use battery often.
@Dhruv-qw7jf
@Dhruv-qw7jf 11 ай бұрын
​@@Sakosagaplease name some as I really need more of these professional workloads centric channels. I know like, close to 20 channels focused on gaming sweating over 10-20 fps, but I was only able to find this one channel that focused on productivity workloads.
@vx-iidu
@vx-iidu 10 ай бұрын
All the time I heard AMD fans saying that AMD is more efficient... turns out that AMD is only efficient if you leave your PC running at full load all the time. (Which is some people, but not most people).
@theTechNotice
@theTechNotice 10 ай бұрын
Exactly...
@bjarne431
@bjarne431 Ай бұрын
Intel has basically always been way more efficient at low/idle load, interesting to see that is still the case today. I remember comparing a hashwell system and amd fx system, the difference was staggering with the amd fx system drawing more power at idle than the hashwell i5 was drawing under load
@tak4043
@tak4043 Ай бұрын
Guru3D does these idle power measurements from the wall on all of their processor reviews and there's basically no difference in idle system power consumption between Intel and AMD.
@michalsvihla1403
@michalsvihla1403 27 күн бұрын
@@bjarne431 Hashwell? Is that the predecessor to Kebablake?
@bjarne431
@bjarne431 27 күн бұрын
@@michalsvihla1403 indeed, and its almost as good as kebab(lake) :-) (i know i misspelled it)
@-opus
@-opus Жыл бұрын
It would have been interesting to see ryzen 5000 cpus included in this, especially considering 12th and 13th gen are included.
@rrsharizam
@rrsharizam Жыл бұрын
I have a Ryzen 5 5600. If I remember it correctly, it idles at around 7W, sometimes under 4W if the reading from the Adrenalin software is true
@-opus
@-opus Жыл бұрын
@KingMacintosh My 5700x is idling at 0.4GHz and 9W, that seems rather mild to me.
@fynkozari9271
@fynkozari9271 Жыл бұрын
The uploader concluded, Intel is better under the assumption gaming PCs will be idle most of the time. Its called "gaming" PC. Its for gaming.
@-opus
@-opus Жыл бұрын
@@fynkozari9271 well your keyboard works, congratulations.
@ryansaltzgiver3651
@ryansaltzgiver3651 Жыл бұрын
Really would have liked to see the new i5-13400 from Intel but either way great video maybe just expand the generations of both companies maybe even 10th and 11th GEN from intel
@elp089
@elp089 Жыл бұрын
It would be useful to see the same comparison with the 65W CPUs.
@klounader
@klounader Жыл бұрын
I support you!
@johnpreston8621
@johnpreston8621 Жыл бұрын
There is no point in testing applications optimized for processors from one of the manufacturers, as in this case. Adobe products are not only optimized for Intel processors, but also use a very small number of cores and threads - it is for this reason that we do not see a serious difference between 6 core and 16 core processors in task execution time. All this makes such reviews absolutely meaningless and false. Any optimization involves completely different principles of load and processor operation - so this video is not about the truth, but about a rude and blatant lie.
@juno1597
@juno1597 Жыл бұрын
@@johnpreston8621 Cope. Adobe has Quick Sync, and the point still stands. Intel overall is way more power efficient unless the processor is underload a significant amount of the time..
@Matti6950
@Matti6950 5 ай бұрын
Trust me 7900 (65 watt) is much better then this char, only the idle will say more or less same (few watt less), all the rest will be better and for sure (without a doubt) beat intel. Did enough research. I have 7950x3d: It's much more power efficient then this video would make you extrapolate or believe.
@SpookFilthy
@SpookFilthy 2 ай бұрын
My ryzen 7900 (non-x) has a poor idle performance. It's exactly consistent with this video. My 12700k is far better
@Real_MisterSir
@Real_MisterSir Жыл бұрын
This is the exact reason I got the 13900K, it has an amazing balance between low task efficiency, and high task brute force. When I see those 24 cores kicking in my 3D renders I love how much time it saves, but in between renders and between workloads in general, I am so thankful that I can have this beast of a CPU sitting at idle barely sipping power. Over time I reckon it will be even more efficient on a yearly basis than my old 9700K - despite being a latest gen i9 and everyone shouting "Intel power consumption bad!!!!". In reality, my experience is the exact opposite. And tbh nobody outside of enterprise studios sit with render queues 24/7 for 100s of customers waiting in line.
@bigbro890
@bigbro890 Жыл бұрын
You'd be better off rendering with a decent gpu. Who still uses cpu for rendering?
@Real_MisterSir
@Real_MisterSir Жыл бұрын
@@bigbro890 There are tons of render software that are cpu-specific optimized due to the accuracy that you only get from cpu rendering - so a gpu would do jackshit for me. If it was a common blender render it would be different, but that ain't me. There are plenty of reasons why one would go with either cpu or gpu rendering, thus far there isn't a "one way solves everything" solution. In my case, Cinema 4D + Corona render only supports cpu rendering, with gpu denoising. I'd gain nothing from upgrading my 2070S to a 4090 (in terms of rendering speed).
@bigbro890
@bigbro890 Жыл бұрын
@@Real_MisterSir There is absolutely no need for cpus accuracy for 3d renders lol. This is the dumbest thing I've heard this year so far
@Real_MisterSir
@Real_MisterSir Жыл бұрын
@@bigbro890 Do a simple test then. Take a complicated scene with complex light bounces and scattering within various transparent and opaque materials. You'll find that the light bounces will have a degree of variance that is far greater for gpu renders, than cpu renders. This is because the gpu cores calculate approximations much better than precise interactions, thus the photon tracing is randomized to a greater extend than cpu rendering. This also leads to more noise, even if the render itself is generated faster, so you will just shift the problem from one place to another, also why most gpu-based render applications use post-process denoising to a greater extend than cpu render applications require - again compromising the potential quality of the final render because denoising is inherently inferior to accurate first-time raw render calculation. Granted, for many people the actual quality difference isn't noteworthy enough to be an issue, or sometimes not even something you'd notice at all if you don't actively search for it. Each task is different, and different render solutions cater to different needs. On top of this there are also other advantages to cpu rendering, such as support for far greater memory capacity since it has direct access to your RAM, compared to the GPU which relies exclusively on VRAM which is still very limited even for the highest tiers of enterprise Nvidia cards, let alone consumer cards that are restricted to 24gb or less. If you render complex scenes with very high texture quality and material complexity, this too can potentially cause more issues with gpu rendering vs cpu rendering. And yes there are other differences too. And no, I do not personally choose cpu rendering because I demand this pinnacle level of quality. I just choose it because my 3D modelling and render software of choice is cpu limited, that's all. But I do appreciate the precision and final quality potential of the renders, as do my clients.
@bigbro890
@bigbro890 Жыл бұрын
@@Real_MisterSir Okay, I liked your comment. You obviously know what you are talking about. As you say, the differences are hard to spot. In my opinion it's not worth the insane render times on cpu.
@georgeindestructible
@georgeindestructible Жыл бұрын
Are C-states on and all for both sides?
@SarfarazYeaseen
@SarfarazYeaseen 9 ай бұрын
Have you tried lowering the power consumption of the intel 13th gen processors via bios? Like undervolting, limiting the temperature or manually putting pl2 values? Please make a video on that.
@Dianaranda123
@Dianaranda123 Жыл бұрын
Maybe a different test you can and should do with Blender is the viewport/eevvee test instead of rendering on CPU. The viewport remaining nice and smooth while working in Blender is the number 1 thing.
@Krenisphia
@Krenisphia Жыл бұрын
My 13700K is using 10-15W watching this video. :)
@olibertud
@olibertud Жыл бұрын
That's true. Being a creator does not utilize CPU/GPU at 100% always. Thanks for this, I am looking for some irl testing of the software both in idle and stress test. Part of being a creator is thinking and that is an idle time so we should consider that.
@dtibor5903
@dtibor5903 Жыл бұрын
10w vs 50w is a dramatic difference of 2-3 dollars per month if running 24/7
@dtibor5903
@dtibor5903 Жыл бұрын
May make a difference if you have a company with hundreds of PC's
@tilapiadave3234
@tilapiadave3234 Жыл бұрын
@@dtibor5903 This is FAR more important than that ,, this information DESTROYS the AMD SHILLS that have been LIARS
@zihechen3111
@zihechen3111 Жыл бұрын
@@tilapiadave3234 😅so true
@rtz6188
@rtz6188 Жыл бұрын
Glad someone pointed it out! This is why I still prefer Intel than AMD. However, I think the low idle power of intel is because of it being monolithic while AMD is using chiplets/soc, not the best explanation but something like that.
@LiveType
@LiveType Жыл бұрын
Yep, it's due to the infinity fabric and I/O die not being able to downclock/ramp up fast enough or else you get stutters. Downside of chiplets but sort of inconsequential for desktop usage. Like it was a ~20 kwh difference for those top end chips. That's not much. Notice how amd laptop SOCs are all monolithic though as that does matter there.
@brianrobinson3961
@brianrobinson3961 Жыл бұрын
I believe you are correct. The new AMD GPU's 7900XT & 7900XTX are chiplet architecture and have high idle power draw. I do believe chiplets are the future but we have to figure out how to make them more efficient at idle.
@reptilespantoso
@reptilespantoso Жыл бұрын
The AMD Ryzen 7000x are just tuned very, very inefficient stock. Intel did that better, objectively. But who cares? This video is just about clicks I realize now.
@dawienel1142
@dawienel1142 Жыл бұрын
@@reptilespantoso Also 5000 series is ALOT more efficient out of the box and my 5800X3D at stock is using between 20-30 watts with some stuff running in the background like Chrome/YT and discord. I will tune my system a bit and try to get it closer to 15 watts. My RTX3080Ti does hover around 50 watts with spikes to 110 watts but it has a 110core and 1100mem OC, again with discord and Chrome/YT open.
@johndoh5182
@johndoh5182 Жыл бұрын
That is EXACTLY it. Using chiplets means you have to boost signal levels to move them from one chiplet to another and even at idle a PC is doing some work. But really, that's such a trivial thing I find it laughable. In all-core loads and gaming Zen 3 and Zen 4 parts like the 5800X3D, 7600X and 5600X destroy Intel parts. And for frames per watts, Techpowerup measures the 13900K at 2.13 fps/W, the 7600X at 4.47fps/W (best) and the 5800X3D at 4.1fps/W (2nd best) This data is old. In case you don't understand this data or question it, Techpowerup does THE most detailed CPU reviews. Gamer's Nexus also does SOME power analysis but nowhere near the detail of Techpowerup. Search "Techpowerup 13900K review". But here's the kicker. The 7600, 7700 and 7900 are all about to lay waste to the line of Intel parts for power consumption. In fact I just checked Techpowerup and they've reviewed the 7600 and 7700 so those are now added to the charts and the 7700 is the most power efficient CPU in all-core loads and near the top for gaming efficiency. Idle? That's your concern? Turn your PC off because the rest of the components are using as much or more than the CPU.
@BornIntoThis20
@BornIntoThis20 9 ай бұрын
Great video, I was looking for something like that. I'm curious where the i5 13500 would land on that comparaison. Somewhere between the 12600k and 13600k would be my guess?
@uwoluwu
@uwoluwu Жыл бұрын
good job ! I think for CAD work, idle makes up an even bigger percentage. I was allready thinking about buiding with intel because of the DDR4 that I have, but based on this video I think I will be going with 13700K instead of 13900 K. Also needing less cooling means less noise and maybe a smaller case. I swithced to GPU rendering some years ago so more cores does very little for me.
@Nods.O
@Nods.O Жыл бұрын
I can reconmend the 13700k it is a beast of a CPU i pick mine up from microcenter for 370$ with coupon code. Everything runs smooth and I even undervolted it with a slight oc 5.5p 4.5e cruches through all my workloads.
@kilosera
@kilosera Жыл бұрын
If you look for a quiet build and do not travel with your PC (case is heavy) then I can recommend Fractal Define C with solid side instead of glass. Currently I run it with 9700k and noctua dh15s - it's really silent even under load (cpu is not OC'd).
@Slimmeyy
@Slimmeyy Жыл бұрын
What BIOS versions were you using? There was an AGESA update that reduced Ryzen 7000 idle wattage to normal levels
@CWWJR
@CWWJR 10 ай бұрын
13900k is MUCH more consisteant. I hated my 7950x. Would boost all over the place doing as little as opening chrome. Idled at 40c-50c. Theis would cause my fans and cpu cooler to ramp up and down constantly when doing nothing on my computer. HATED IT! Just Crazy. My 13900k (-0.090 Undervolted) idles at 26-28c! Thats it. It never boost all over the place opening apps and chrome. The only time it was more efficient was when under load or in Cinebench. Otherwise the 1300k is much better. It also never goes over 85c with my Undervolt. Gaming temps are lower on intel by 12c!
@tbard
@tbard 5 ай бұрын
Curious about the figures you used to calculate the KW/Year figure (if it's in the video I missed it). Looking into cpus for a homelab so I'd have to figure out what would be the KW/year for 24/7/365 load of 30/40% on most cores to have a ballpark idea what the difference could be between a 7950x and a 13900k (and a 5950x and 7945hx and a 13900h too ideally, if I find any figures about those around)
@AirGunWeb
@AirGunWeb Жыл бұрын
Very detailed analysis. Thank you. PC World did a similar video showing the same results. I love the analogy of testing MPG at 200mph vs. average use. That was excellent. Thanks for the data Cheers Rick
@theflyingkaramazovbrothers6
@theflyingkaramazovbrothers6 6 ай бұрын
Here after the Gamers Nexus video today.
@treyquattro
@treyquattro Жыл бұрын
this is a very interesting test that provokes more investigation. It would be interesting to measure actual wall power usage over an extended time (I could do this myself if I had a power meter) for a truly real-world measurement of domestic computing costs. I've noticed my own 12900 system showing a package power draw of typically something like 23W in a quiescent state. It's only when doing something like Cinebench or prime95 that the consumption figures really shoot up (along with the fan speed). Of course, HwInfo64 isn't telling the entire story of power usage, but it's a good indicator. ETA: ah, you did the real-world wall-socket test! I commented too early. Excellent work.
@lycanthoss
@lycanthoss 24 күн бұрын
Commenting this a year late, but a BIOS update can also change how much power your CPU is using while idling. For example I remember seeing ~20W idle power usage (HWINFO CPU package) on my 12600K and it turned to ~9-13W after updating BIOS.
@mikegraham4255
@mikegraham4255 Ай бұрын
For general use, which cpu produces less heat?
@justindressler5992
@justindressler5992 Жыл бұрын
Exactly all that matters is how fast they are because the time saved doing a compile or render is worth way more over a year than a couple of coffee. Probably if you get more done then you will safe money of coffees too while waiting for a task to complete 😀
@edumartin6322
@edumartin6322 Жыл бұрын
This is a surprise and a very cool discovery. Congratulations, great work !! Out of curiosity, which power mode have you set in config ? Also, have you tried AMD eco mode ?
@theTechNotice
@theTechNotice Жыл бұрын
Both systems tested in balanced power mode
@furious_dracko583
@furious_dracko583 6 ай бұрын
Tech notice didn't include any x3D chips, which give better performance per watts, in my observations. Is there any comparison with x3d chips ?
@mtmmf7632
@mtmmf7632 Жыл бұрын
Great work buddy… this channel is slowly becoming my go to tech channel!!! Happy new year as well…
@masterchi17
@masterchi17 Жыл бұрын
Great test! I fully agree with the findings. The max power draw is only needed for deciding cooling. For the vast majority of users the CPU is 95% of the time, so the low load power draw determines the cost.
@iikatinggangsengii2471
@iikatinggangsengii2471 Жыл бұрын
true
@TheAddanz
@TheAddanz Жыл бұрын
Except HWInfo doesnt display accurate Wattage when AMD cpus are idle. Test yourself using Ryzen Master side by side with HWInfo and you see the wattage drop when cores park on Ryzen Master, but not on HWinfo. HWInfo is wrong
@RobTheBeat
@RobTheBeat 5 ай бұрын
​@@TheAddanzWij van wc eend adviseren wc eend
@ofernandofilo
@ofernandofilo Жыл бұрын
can you disable efficiency cores and rerun the tests? I have doubts if they really help and if they are responsible for the economy. thx _o/
@Druac
@Druac Жыл бұрын
Real world testing is where it is at. Benchmarks only show a part of the picture. That being said, I think anyone would be happy with either of the two flagship chips. I'm loving the bump I got from my upgrade this week. Moved from 6th gen i7 with a 1080 to a 13th gen i9 13900k and an Asus Strix 3080ti...OMG! These two parts are working in conjunction with my Z790 Maximus Hero and the upgrade is AWESOME.
@Phenom98
@Phenom98 Жыл бұрын
Damn that's a big upgrade!
@saricubra2867
@saricubra2867 Жыл бұрын
3080Ti is the best well rounded Ampere card, good choice there. A friend build a 3080Ti system with a Ryzen 9 5900X.
@younaz
@younaz Жыл бұрын
How would an intel 13 gen + 4000 nvidia series gpu compare to a Max Studio in power consumption? I built a PC for video- editing in 2022 and now I need a second unit (also for video editing in Da Vinci Resolve)and I would rather to build another pc, but I worry about electricity bills, as I have already noticed a significant increment with just the one unit I use, so I'm wondering if I should go with a mac studio as a second unit. Thank you all for your help!
@MLWJ1993
@MLWJ1993 Жыл бұрын
A PC doesn't stand a chance against Apple silicon when it comes to power draw during video editing tasks. If that's all you need it to do I'd get the studio if you're going for pure efficiency.
@rob90230
@rob90230 Жыл бұрын
Great work. It would be interesting to measure actual wall power usage comparing an Intel based desktop versus an Intel based laptop. I know these chips are different (even with the same model numbers). I would like to know how much saving do I get using a laptop.
@Lagggerengineering
@Lagggerengineering Жыл бұрын
This definitely needs to be expanded. Compare DDR5 and DDR4, older ryzen 5000 generations, possibly even 11th gen Intel and CPUs with lower TDPs
@Lagggerengineering
@Lagggerengineering Жыл бұрын
Oh, also the Ryzen Eco mode should be added, I love that function!
@nomars4827
@nomars4827 Жыл бұрын
I've made a lot of testing with my Ryzen 5600H Laptop to find out its best performance per Wat. Power efficiency depends on max TDP. So it was 15 W for a 50 W processor. Where it has exactly 50% of max computing power but much lower temperatures
@2kubal
@2kubal 7 ай бұрын
Hello Im working full time and have no time to let my computer "idle" when i switch it on I instatly start gaming doing some work stuff. Would u conisder Amd instead of intel for example ryzen 5 7.6 instead of intel 13.5 ??? Would love to get the answer quick I'm buying pc this week❤❤
@pwhv
@pwhv Жыл бұрын
amazing video! just what i was looking for, would you do another video for the 7000 series NON-X? just to keep a track if the newest AMD cpu's are more power efficient this time as they are claiming :O
@wolfenwingsable
@wolfenwingsable Жыл бұрын
And compare to the locked 13th gen cpus as well!
@WSS_the_OG
@WSS_the_OG Жыл бұрын
Great way of presenting the data. Considering and including "idle" or "
@sylasyukale5095
@sylasyukale5095 10 ай бұрын
This is awesome content, it's rare to see these type of calculations. I would like to see the X3D chips as the 3DV-cache helps with power efficiency. But keep up the good work! :)
@HopemanGG
@HopemanGG Ай бұрын
This is the highest idle measurement I have ever seen on an AMD CPU package. Weird...
@renerant
@renerant Жыл бұрын
The AMD minimum clock was 3500mhz on one core, while on Intel it was 1100/800mhz on p/e cores...There's definitely something wrong with the AMD power management, either in windows and or in bios....
@tilapiadave3234
@tilapiadave3234 Жыл бұрын
BAD Engineering ,,,, but so many MNAY millions believe those AMD shill liars
@uwontremembertrue1454
@uwontremembertrue1454 Ай бұрын
Exactly
@javiiermendes
@javiiermendes 10 ай бұрын
I'm having a hard time keeping my i7 13700 KF below 90c at 5.1 P and 4.1 E cores. I'm trying to get my motherboard down to 190Watt and 90c is the least I can get with acceptable impact on Cine Bench
@KarsonNow
@KarsonNow Жыл бұрын
How about to run both architectures in ECO mode?
@abhishekkm4455
@abhishekkm4455 Жыл бұрын
Great analysis. A lot of content creators consider performance per watt which obviously gives per second efficiency this could be misleading. 10:16 Power consumption over time should be considered. Example 10w for 4s is definitely better than 7w for 6s.
@RunForPeace-hk1cu
@RunForPeace-hk1cu Жыл бұрын
Not for a laptop due to thermal throttling… it’s not straight forward as you claim
@herodes6200
@herodes6200 10 ай бұрын
idk why everyone says AMD consumes less. Got 7800X3D/ 3090/ 64GB DDR5 with X670E Mainboard and it consumes much more than my previous build (11600k/3090/64GB DDDR4) in idle. Ingame the 7800 does consume way less than intel, but idle tdp (155w with 2 1440p monitors) is wild in my current setup.
@Matti6950
@Matti6950 2 ай бұрын
Dunno what you are doing but 155 watt is insanely much for your setup. I use 104 watt idle average with 7950x3d (uses more idle, about 8-10 watt), 1080 gtx, single monitor, X670E motherboard and 64gb DDR5. You are either overlocking or disabled some sleep state bios settings, causing massive idle power. This is with 5 SSD's and 1 harddrive.
@wocket42
@wocket42 Жыл бұрын
As a German, I can tell you that the fuel consumption of a car at full throttle and top speed absolutely matters for every day life.
@theTechNotice
@theTechNotice Жыл бұрын
:)
@JsGamingHub18
@JsGamingHub18 Жыл бұрын
You test shown so much real life usage of processor, thanks a ton for this man & do answer my below question please: So what would you recommend for productivity on premiere & davinci I5 12600k or 13600k with MSI B660m mortar wifi & Ak620 cooler (ain't gonna overclock it) paired with 3060 or 3060ti
@sensible4170
@sensible4170 Жыл бұрын
buy what you can afford. but beware when buying a b660 as it will probably require a bios update before you can plug a 13th gen on it. and you will need a 12th gen cpu to update the bios. some motherboard do have a feature to update bios without the need for a cpu. do some research first.
@JsGamingHub18
@JsGamingHub18 Жыл бұрын
@@sensible4170 yess 🙌🏼
@saricubra2867
@saricubra2867 Жыл бұрын
I undervolted my i7-12700K by -120mv and power limit is set to 190 watts. I use FL Studio and it maxed out at 142 watts for a project that used 80-90% of the chip. 60 degrees as the max. I don't know if my tuned i7 is the highest perf/watt chip on the list. Efficency goes away when i enable AVX512, system responsiveness isn't the same too without Big-Little. Motherboard is MSI-Z690 Pro A DDR5, Deepcool Assassin 3 , Corsair 5000D Airflow and 32GB Corsair DDR5 4800 (no XMP, just stock). After i used stock power limits and undervolted the chip, i reduced power consumption by 35% for the same multicore perfomance on Cinebench (almost 23000 points). And iddle power draw is 10 watts with a partial overclock, no core parking, infinite turbo.
@quintrapnell3605
@quintrapnell3605 Жыл бұрын
Undervolting is almost always the way to go.
@1SaG
@1SaG 7 ай бұрын
Power draw in all-core, 100% workloads is quite scary on my 14700 KF (over 300W peak), but I totally agree that this is hardly a measure of how the CPU will perform in the real world. Unless all you do all day is run CPU benchmarks like Cinebench or Blender, I suppose.. :) Power limits on my board are indeed set to "no limits" at the board's factory settings and that's the whole problem. Also doesn't help that MSI have labeled the three PL-presets in the BIOS in a sightly misleading way. Even the lowest preset will set PL1 and PL2 to 253 W and it's labeled "boxed cooler". I'd like to see any Intel stock-cooler keep up with this CPU at those PL-settings, lol. The "no limits" preset is called "water cooler" or something similar, implying that you can run your CPU without power limits on a 240mm (or even a 120?) AIO. Which I could with my much less power-hungry 12600K but definitely NOT with the 14700KF. All that said: After having read up on the whole power-limit thing, I adjusted PLs, max current and voltage offset manually and the chip will now run right up to the limit of thermal throttling while drawing ~240W max and giving me the CB23 results you'd expect from an i7. All that on a 240 AiO. In the real world, the CPU never draws more than 40 or 50 W in more demanding games, sometimes peaking as high as 70 to 100W in certain circumstances. At idle and/or in desktop/browsing mode, it's very frugal and hardly ever jumps over 10W. True idle with just a sensor monitoring app open it'll sit at around 3W all the time.
@LawrenceTimme
@LawrenceTimme Жыл бұрын
The faster cpu should have paid for itself in less than a day even when you factor electricity for the whole year.
@theTechNotice
@theTechNotice Жыл бұрын
There's a point in there...
@lookin4talentt
@lookin4talentt Жыл бұрын
Amazing comparison! I just wanted to know what power plan were you using during this test and have you tried using AMD power saving plan to see if it changes idl result ?
@Uncle_yandere
@Uncle_yandere Жыл бұрын
is it possible to find a i9 13900T ?
@wolfenwingsable
@wolfenwingsable Жыл бұрын
I like this. Im a truck driver and a gamer and lookong to build a 1080/1440 gaming computer while limiting power for my truck. Definitely still looking at a 12600kf /3070.
@maxjames00077
@maxjames00077 Жыл бұрын
Great combo! I just got my 13600k and love it but 12th gen still amazing too
@triforcelink
@triforcelink Жыл бұрын
Look into something like the i5 12400T, T sku is more power efficient.
@QuangHa-ee9fw
@QuangHa-ee9fw Жыл бұрын
Is main B760i suitable for intel 13700k?
@rickcooperjr62864
@rickcooperjr62864 Жыл бұрын
on windows 11 currently AMD is idling high on clocks due to a power profile glitch and I believe even latest windows 10 version is also when they removed the ryzen power profiles from OS it bugged out the power states on AMD I am seeing on avg 25w-50w higher idle power draw over when they had the ryzen optimized power profiles.
@saricubra2867
@saricubra2867 Жыл бұрын
Intel's efficient cores still would use far less energy than a low clocked Zen 4 one despite the huge difference in IPC.
@SpookFilthy
@SpookFilthy 2 ай бұрын
On Linux the idle power draw of my ryzen 7900 is equally as bad as this video demonstrates.
@TheAzzzzzzzza
@TheAzzzzzzzza Жыл бұрын
Amd idle power is caused by the chiplets architecture. Their monolithic mobile cores don't need to move the data off chip & are far more efficient.
@saricubra2867
@saricubra2867 Жыл бұрын
It has nothing to do with chiplet or monolithic. Even AMD would be wrecked by Intel on laptops. Big-Little is used by Intel right now, AMD doesn't.
@bgtubber
@bgtubber Жыл бұрын
​@@saricubra2867 OP is right. It is because of the chiplet architecture. The IO chip (which doesn't exist in Intel CPUs) consumes power even if the CPU cores aren't doing anything. It consumes even more power when the cores from two or more chiplets need to communicate with each other. It's one of the trade-offs of the chiplet-based architectures - the IO chip always needs to be active (hence consume power).
@saricubra2867
@saricubra2867 Жыл бұрын
@@bgtubber Is not the I/O, it's the Zen 4 core's power consumption vs the Gracemont cores from Alder Lake and Raptor Lake. AMD will use Big-Little for Zen 5.
@bgtubber
@bgtubber Жыл бұрын
​@@saricubra2867 Again, this has nothing to do with the power consumption of the cores because most of the cores are _parked_ (inactive) when a CPU is in idle and they consume pretty much 0 Watts each. The IO chiplet though HAS to be active at all times even if no cores are active, so this brings up the power consumption of AMD chips in Idle (but not by much compared to Intel). Nothing to do with _core_ power draw since in idle almost all cores are parked (0 Watts consumption).
@saricubra2867
@saricubra2867 Жыл бұрын
@@bgtubber The iddle power consumption in the video doesn't look like parked cores. I reach 10 watts on my i7-12700K at iddle without core parking, partially overclocked AND and an adaptative undervolt at the same time.
@Mittowz
@Mittowz Жыл бұрын
I did some testing with the 7700X manual oc 1.18Vcore 5.2ghz. Also there's a setting in the bios that forces all the other parts of the cpu (iGPU Infinity fabric, etc) to run at full speed all the time. I turned that off. My idle is around 25-30 watts cpu package. Cinebench R23 ends up at around 19700 points using a max of 110 watts in hwinfo64. Without tweaking, these newer cpu's are power hogs.
@SirWolf2018
@SirWolf2018 Жыл бұрын
AMD Eco mode measurements please? Especially with the 7900X, which is the most efficient of all at highest load, according to my calculations.
@SirHackaL0t.
@SirHackaL0t. Жыл бұрын
I wonder how much difference it makes to do a set amount of work instead of a set amount of hours. So converting 10,000 photos, exporting 4 hrs of video a day etc. The faster processors should take less time whilst consuming more energy whilst working. :)
@BT-st4ho
@BT-st4ho Жыл бұрын
Very interesting content! This makes me doubt on my choice on building an pc for cad/cam software with an AMD 7 7700 processor. What processor would you advice for design and manufacturing software (Inventor and Fusion360)?
@harrison00xXx
@harrison00xXx Жыл бұрын
Why? Because you can save 10$ on energy bills a year?!
@BT-st4ho
@BT-st4ho Жыл бұрын
@@harrison00xXx no, it’s going to be my first build and im still researching on things. my goal is to make the pc as quite as possible. For that reason I want to use hardware that doesn’t generates an lot of head, so i don’t have to run the case fans on an high rpm. Less head = less noise are my thoughts behind it.
@harrison00xXx
@harrison00xXx Жыл бұрын
@@BT-st4ho Fans? I mean i have 2 fans in my notebook, but unless i drive it really hard they are not noticable and mostly just go in idle speed of 1600 rpm, otherwise they are just OFF. Rarely, when video upscaling the fans are getting noticable, but still more silent than the average Desktop. No good performing x86 platform will ever be very silent (or efficient) in the near future, if you want it as silent as possible you need to switch to Apple silicon Macs. I bought over a year ago a 16" M1 Pro and i cant say anything bad except that its not good for gaming but i cant care less since i have a dedicated gaming notebook and an older gaming PC.
@BT-st4ho
@BT-st4ho Жыл бұрын
@@harrison00xXx yess i almost pulled the trigger on an MacBook PRO 16 M2. I love their power efficiency compared with an windows. Problem is that most CAM software an cnc controlling software don’t run on macos. That’s why i have to go with X86. I recently received an R9 7900 (65/88w tdp) and an Noctua U12A cpu cooler. I think the acoustics should be very low in my fractal design north with 5 noctua case fans. If I ever need more power from the cpu this should be no problem. If I ever buying an laptop, it’s going to be an macbook for sure
@zihechen3111
@zihechen3111 Жыл бұрын
@@BT-st4ho yes, intel is cooler and has less noise at idle. It also has better ram control . Its actually hard to find a suitable ddr5 that does not take mins on start screen loading if it’s on am5 system.
@FlorinArjocu
@FlorinArjocu Жыл бұрын
The first time I saw the same conclusion was at PcWorld. At that time there was the 12th gen, but the same seems to be valid for the 13th gen, it is even better actually. The same I would like for laptops, power is more important in a laptop.
@user-up6jy6ks5q
@user-up6jy6ks5q Ай бұрын
Was min and max software reported numbers?
@gernot4490
@gernot4490 Жыл бұрын
and how about the new ryzen 7700, 7900, without the x ? its only 65 tdp?
@YalokIy
@YalokIy Жыл бұрын
Also interesting about pugetbench scores. I really wonder what is the amount of included tests that are part of 99% of general usage of an overage photoshop user. Could be that there are some included tests that in real life are commonly used by only 1% of photoshop users, but on the other hand make the results of intel look nicer? By the way, techpowerup's photoshop custom test puts 7700X above 13900k in performance.
@quintrapnell3605
@quintrapnell3605 2 ай бұрын
I don’t think my PC is idle very much. I turn it off when I’m not gaming.
@lochnkey5216
@lochnkey5216 Жыл бұрын
Do you have any experience with the Ryzen 7 5700x CPU? If so, how does it run with the RTX 3060 ti for video editing? Any info you can provide would help me out big time! Thanks for providing great information.
@mariuspuiu9555
@mariuspuiu9555 Жыл бұрын
you won't have any issues with that CPU.
@lochnkey5216
@lochnkey5216 Жыл бұрын
@@mariuspuiu9555 Thanks. I was thinking of upgrading to a i7 12700k and 3070 but for $600 more than my current system. I mostly do 4k braw editing on Premiere while starting to learn Davinici. Just so many options in computers, and I don't know what's the best bang for the buck.
@mariuspuiu9555
@mariuspuiu9555 Жыл бұрын
@@lochnkey5216 you don't need to be on the bleeding edge to do your work properly. enjoy your very capable and cheaper system. put that money towards more ram and a good GPU (Davinci Resolve uses the GPU a lot, especially the studio version)
@omuleanu
@omuleanu Жыл бұрын
where would the 7900 non X be on the chart on 9:25 ?
@abaj006
@abaj006 Жыл бұрын
Can you measure power draw ar the wall instead of relying solely on what software reports?
@tilapiadave3234
@tilapiadave3234 Жыл бұрын
Did you NOT watch the video???????????????????????????????????????????????
@abaj006
@abaj006 Жыл бұрын
@@tilapiadave3234 obviously you didn't watch the video, because he specifically mentioned he used software only. The issue with software reporting is that it depends on the calibration of the hardware sensors, and different manufacturers may produce very different results for the same measurements.
@renchesandsords
@renchesandsords Жыл бұрын
I think a better way of measuring power consumption for low power draws is using a current clamp or a power meter, since even in HWinfo64, it tells you lower down that there's a power measurement deviation for ryzen of up to 200% (this is just what I've seen on 5950x), with it regularly being around 150% at around 50W displayed. but yes, that aside, I do agree with you that amd tends to suffer on desktop for idle power consumption for a current clamp, they can be had for less than $50 and work by measuring the current passing through the wire, you would just need to clamp it sround the 4 (or 8) 12V wires for the eps plugs
@stephenbeeson1521
@stephenbeeson1521 Жыл бұрын
Are the 13th gen processors under volt'd or running stock?
@theTechNotice
@theTechNotice Жыл бұрын
Stock
@orion9k
@orion9k 10 ай бұрын
Just measure the WATT OUTPUT comming from your wall going into your PC and do THE SAME workflow on every CPU and see how much WATT they ACTUALLY use per WORKFLOW.
@partnersincraft1889
@partnersincraft1889 Жыл бұрын
gaming and many other applications types have hard spikes in utilization, it is still very very important to get a psu that can handle your full CPU.
@samserious1337
@samserious1337 Жыл бұрын
4:55 have you checked your BIOS settings? A minimal VDDCR of 1.36V in IDLE seems unusual, this should be around 1.0V. When did you start monitoring in HWINFO? Running PS in the background isn't cosidered IDLE though.
@Phenom98
@Phenom98 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, AMD voltages out of the box are absolute crap. I managed to get my 5700x to run all day at 4.6ghz using only 1V and 60W peak. Usually around 20-30 though
@saricubra2867
@saricubra2867 Жыл бұрын
@@Phenom98 Also Intel voltages, my i7-12700K new was pulling 230 watts and 1.45 volts. I reduced that thing from 1.45 volts to 1.2, then 230 watts to 170 for Cinebench R23. Thanks MSI.
@Alpine_flo92002
@Alpine_flo92002 4 ай бұрын
AMD stock voltages are very floaty. They move around a ton and rarely settle for a long time at lower voltages. Intel downclocks way more aggressively and also moves voltages quicker
@faizanshah1281
@faizanshah1281 3 ай бұрын
@@Phenom98how
@lazarosd
@lazarosd Жыл бұрын
Great content mate, happy new year with even more great stuff from you!
@Chejov1214
@Chejov1214 11 ай бұрын
great job! thanks for this review/comparison ! it would be interesting to know how much total pc consumes doing those tasks ( with or without a monitor) I think on average a gpu ( depending which of course) on idle - doing something could consume around 20-60w ?? ( not gaming not rendering ). and ram. around 8 -10 watts ? fans 12watts.. ssd like 10 ? Motherboard ,,mm : around 20 w ? of course this are my'' just out of the pocket '' assumptions .. :P. so. the whole pc ( without monitor) would be consuming on average ( doing simple tasks ). 30-40 watts cpu + 50 w gpu + 20 w Motherboard ?+ 25 w ram&ssd &fans (?) = more or less 90-120 watts ?
@ibitaRaptor
@ibitaRaptor 11 ай бұрын
Sorry I am a newb to this, what software he is using to monitor CPU wattage usage?
@theTechNotice
@theTechNotice 11 ай бұрын
Hwinfo64
@ericl5973
@ericl5973 Жыл бұрын
Well done. It has been hard to find the idle power consumptions for the AMD parts. Even on the old Intel parts, idle power consumption in HW info is often in the single digits (9-11w on i7-6700 while typing this comment). I rarely put my computer to sleep as they rarely wake up properly and often leave them on to quickly resume work the next day. The power of the 7950x would be nice for encoding but the high idle power is a concern as that is 90% of the use case.
@Matty-rn5gt
@Matty-rn5gt Жыл бұрын
Did you install the latest AMD chipset drivers? They made a big difference on my system for idle power.
@Matty-rn5gt
@Matty-rn5gt Жыл бұрын
@@nyimakgan the latest drivers and the version before both had an impact. I’m going to fresh install 22H2 next to see how much that helps. It’s not a
@michaelnguyen9027
@michaelnguyen9027 Жыл бұрын
I'm a little confused. Doesn't Idle mean the computer is not being used at all; meaning the computer is not running any programs? Your "idle" power consumption shows a program running in the background, which means it wouldn't be idle. It would be running in the background.
@deuswulf6193
@deuswulf6193 Жыл бұрын
No, "idle" can include non intensive apps being run or left open even. Reading a website for example or having an empty scene with blender running, and nothing being rendered. Think of it like starting a car and while its in drive, without pushing down on the gas pedal, the car still moves forward. You can still move from point A to point B. That's kind of what "idle" refers to in the context of the CPU.
@iAdam43
@iAdam43 Жыл бұрын
I am used to idle on my pc a lot and seeing usage of 10W while watching youtube or just some light tasks its crazy good.. Intels 13 and 12gen cpus are just really amazing, I am in love with this thing
@urkent4463
@urkent4463 4 ай бұрын
1.6 to 1.8 Watts on Energy-profile 'enery-saving' for my 13600k with browser and vid open otherwise 20 get the switch for ya taskbars guys - powerplanswitcher - microsoft store
@MrSeppieD
@MrSeppieD Жыл бұрын
Interesting results, especially since they seem to be in contrast with results from most other reviews, and with physics (5nm technology ought to be more efficient than 10nm). I did understand that Ryzen's performance/watt improves a lot when running them in eco mode, e.g. when running the 7950x in 105W or even 65W instead of its default 170W mode.
@maxjames00077
@maxjames00077 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, imagine when Intel gets on the same node size! Can't wait for them to make something in the leadership position again power performance wise!
@lapz6758
@lapz6758 11 ай бұрын
​@@maxjames00077kinda necroposting but intel is pretty damn close to tsmc 5nm with intel 7(former 10nm and the reason they renamed it is obvious haha)
@LHMF8
@LHMF8 Жыл бұрын
7950X são dois CCX/chiplets, eu já vi e li a respeito que algumas aplicações não conseguem usar mais de um CCX/chiplets, será que isso foi verificado no caso da aplicação usada no teste aos 20:30 até porquê se for uma aplicação que tem preferencia em single Thread será notório o melhor desempenho em determinadas aplicações dependendo de como essas foram programadas, também um dos motivos dos melhores processadores preço/benefício estarem "no meio" da lista de suas gerações...
@user-xq2qe8oh4u
@user-xq2qe8oh4u 7 ай бұрын
Hello. Please advise. at the moment, I have a 10400 and a 6700xt (undervolt). I was assembling a PC to consume less energy, since I live in Ukraine. Should I change to 12400 or 7600 or 7500f? and which of them will consume less? thank you
@danielkowalski7527
@danielkowalski7527 6 ай бұрын
12400 + get some nvidia gpu for lower power consumption undervolted 4060 goes below 100w
@granolafunk6192
@granolafunk6192 Жыл бұрын
For Ryzen 5000 series it really depends on the CPU and utilization for workload power draw. I can't say fully yet for 7000 series. But per core power utilization I get more from my 5950x than my 5900x or my 5800x. I think that has to do with the binning. Both my 5900x and 5800x use a decent more watts per core. My 5600x is pretty close to the 5950x per core. But the point of that thing is to max frequencies. So a lot gets wasted going those last few hundred.
@Arkadietza
@Arkadietza 5 ай бұрын
Hi, Can you do the same review with all new CPUs?
@Heezay
@Heezay Жыл бұрын
how is the power consumption in games?
@auritro3903
@auritro3903 Ай бұрын
Since games are more intensive, in general amd consumes less than intel
@JJ-gk5tn
@JJ-gk5tn Жыл бұрын
Does this count for gaming too ??
@HopemanGG
@HopemanGG Ай бұрын
Unfortunately there's lots of unknowns here and I wish there wasn't. 1. If you used some testing workflows with a fixed duration(?) then depending on the type of test, there could be a problem: The faster CPU might complete more work in the same amount of time than the slower CPU and as expected use more power. 2. guru3d checked total system power consumption of the system measured directly from the wall and the idle system draw with the 7800x3D was 75W while the most efficient modern CPU from Intel, the 12600k, was at 76W. So either there is something wrong with your AMD system or the HWINFO metrics can't be trusted. Also to quote techpowerup on the subject: "We're not using the software sensors inside the processor, as these can be quite inaccurate and will vary between manufacturers." 3. Your AMD idle power draw results seem to be insanely high. Something seems wrong when one compares it with other reputable sites' results.
@tak4043
@tak4043 Ай бұрын
Came to post something similar after KZfaq wanted me to watch this. I trust Guru3Ds total system idle power consumption numbers over these. CPU idle power usage differences are useless if the system draws the same power from the wall anyway.
@billnoname8093
@billnoname8093 Жыл бұрын
Yeah I hate that they use rendering for benchmarks. I want to know how the chip is going to work in the view port, I didn't understand this and the system I built is good, but I would have changed to a better chip. I use blender to design but I'm not rendering that much, I spend more time designing. So what I learned later is single core performance is what I should have been paying attention too. I got an AMD 5800x, rtx 3080 12gb, 64 gb ram, m.2 drive, which isn't bad, but I can bog it down with a lot of modifiers. one good thing is I can still upgrade to a 5950x. I'm just waiting for the prices to drop some more. I think with all that I've learned in the past year I would have gotten an intel chip, they have better single core performance.
@TheAhanin
@TheAhanin Жыл бұрын
Hey, Get an digital PSU like HXi series from Corsair. With digital PSUs you can monitor each cable or socket power consumption.
@diegotoledo6798
@diegotoledo6798 Жыл бұрын
Can the AE crowd request some testing benchmarks as well? Most of the rendering workload falls on the CPU and Ram for motion design/animation. :)
@mdhazeldine
@mdhazeldine Жыл бұрын
This is a really interesting test, but I'm trying to decide between the 13600k, 13700k and 13900k. I'm a full time photographer and I'm trying to understand the difference in power consumption and therefore electricity cost would be over a typical year between the 3 CPUs? Is it significant or inconsequential?
@Rocky-AR
@Rocky-AR Жыл бұрын
You're not going to make a dent to your electricity bill for photography since it's mainly burst CPU usage (culling & photo adjustments). You would have to export ten of thousands of photos daily to even consider power consumption. Which software do you use and are you a high volume photo exporter?
@mdhazeldine
@mdhazeldine Жыл бұрын
@@Rocky-AR Mostly LR and Photoshop. I don't do high volume work, so most of my time is spent doing compositing and detailed retouching work in PS. I kind of came to a similar conclusion after watching some other videos and doing some maths on it. I bought the i9 13900k in the end.
@auritro3903
@auritro3903 2 ай бұрын
@@mdhazeldine 13900k isnt a bad choice. Since its a full time job, processing photos will require a lot of cores and high productivity. 13600k is more power efficient though.
@mehowek1648
@mehowek1648 3 ай бұрын
I feel the same. It is not about full idle but small tasks in the background. Even playing YT video on Ryzen setup draws much morre power than my intel setup. If you use your PC 12+ hours a day this can contribute to power bills.
@mrugeshmaheshwari390
@mrugeshmaheshwari390 Жыл бұрын
Apart from power consumption do high temperatures affect life of processor in long run ???
@vMaxHeadroom
@vMaxHeadroom Жыл бұрын
It depends what you mean by hi temps. Anything up to 80 degrees C is no issues whatsover but even at 90 degrees C the CPU should run fine for the life of the CPU as it will never be running at max load 24/7. I have always overclocked and now undervolt as well but during my older days with the likes of a 4790K heavily overclocked, I had no issues over the 5 year run...Good cooling is important and I have been using AIO's for many years now and they do keep the CPU's even at max load/speed Cinebemch 23 at around 70 to 80c on my current 13700K.
@mrugeshmaheshwari390
@mrugeshmaheshwari390 Жыл бұрын
@@vMaxHeadroom ok thank you for answer.... i m gonna buy new pc in few days so this was the only thing i was concerned about because i want igpu of intel ........ But seeing high temperature thing about INTEL was confusing me ....
@AldoV
@AldoV Жыл бұрын
So most of popular review missed this huge point!! Great job!
@ChiquitaSpeaks
@ChiquitaSpeaks Жыл бұрын
Very nice the only thing missing is metrics when undervolted/power limited as it makes quite a big difference between the generations. It puts Intel and AMD on par in workload and you can get 90% of performance at 50% of the power often times. The new generation is quite a bit more efficient as it’s supposed to with that in effect. Idle is still significant as an issue though I hope AMD finds a way to deal maybe using efficiency cores in the future as well as they are already increasing their expertise in chiplets design. That nd gaming benchmarks for power really unfortunate Intel removed AVX 512 instructions because immigration and future gaming is supposed to benefit a lot from that as it etches closer towards simulation
@juno1597
@juno1597 Жыл бұрын
Intel CPU's perform even better when undervolted, I don't see the point of your comment.
@dy7296
@dy7296 Жыл бұрын
Ryzen 8000 series is coming up with the big.little architecture as well. And I am certain it might come out more efficient given the Zen architecture is more efficient overall just that Intel has that big.little core config sooner.
@Rouxenator
@Rouxenator Жыл бұрын
My 8-core Ryzen 7 5700G averages around 11watts while my 2-core Ryzen embedded R1305G averages 6.5watts. The later being a passive cooled 8watt TDP CPU working hard all the time just to run Windows 11.
@wezkerlim
@wezkerlim 7 ай бұрын
so in the end, if we factor gaming into the mix, intel or amd will be more power efficient? both in desktop & laptop. in uk, 5 quid difference isn't a lot annually, but in 3rd world countries, it's a big difference. considering these days we have tons of power hungry features emeging like ray tracing, high refresh rate monitors etc.
@Nick-mr6gd
@Nick-mr6gd Жыл бұрын
Two years ago I built a pc for my son with a i5-10400f. I choose this instead of Ryzen 3600 because of the lower temperatures in games and better (in game) performance at the same time. His pc is really dead silent with a FUMA 2 cpu cooler and Nitro 5700xt card at 1440p gaming and most important, it is problems free. I recently bought a 5800x3d for my pc to replace my Ryzen 2700 and now I am in process of RMA it because of whea errors following by restarts. If I could afford it I would replace my system for a 13600k/13700k but, unfortunately I cannot do this right now...
@h1tzzYT
@h1tzzYT Жыл бұрын
" because of whea errors following by restarts." I had the exact same issue with my 5950x, only new cpu sample fixed it. Its actually very well known issue and whats bizarre that even with 5800x3d launch amd couldnt manage to fix that. Im going to use my 5950x for a long time, but when the time comes for an upgrade im going intel 100%
@BeardsChips
@BeardsChips Жыл бұрын
Do a wall test, not a HWInfo Test. It's meaningless to measure what HWInfo tells you from some sensors located at different parts of the chip vs what the actual PC draws from the wall as a whole system. Zen is basically a SOC while Intel is not doing the same approach.
@JakubVacek42
@JakubVacek42 Ай бұрын
You can measure it from PSU that allows you access. For example the -i series power supplies from Corsair (RM850i, AX1200i, etc). Data is then reported to HWiNFO as well so nothing else changes in your process.
@darkobladez4643
@darkobladez4643 Жыл бұрын
I’m a gamer and I still love to follow your channel. You talk about a lot of issues that are not covered anywhere else and offer a lot of details regarding testing. Keep up the great work!
How Much Power Does Your Gaming PC Use? STOP WASTING MONEY!
12:50
Tech Illiterate
Рет қаралды 91 М.
Super gymnastics 😍🫣
00:15
Lexa_Merin
Рет қаралды 106 МЛН
Василиса наняла личного массажиста 😂 #shorts
00:22
Денис Кукояка
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
Tom & Jerry !! 😂😂
00:59
Tibo InShape
Рет қаралды 50 МЛН
Sigma Girl Past #funny #sigma #viral
00:20
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН
Why Five Stroke Engines Are More Efficient But Still a Failure
18:18
driving 4 answers
Рет қаралды 311 М.
The Best & Worst Gaming CPUs of 2024 Ranked! ⚡ Tier List
28:30
ScatterVolt
Рет қаралды 448 М.
Answering Your Power Efficiency Questions! | Homelab Power Optimization Q&A
16:46
The Forbidden and Forgotten UMC Green 486 CPU
15:46
vswitchzero
Рет қаралды 90 М.
AMD Ryzen Eco Mode Deep-Dive & Benchmarks on R9 7950X (Zen 4)
28:39
Gamers Nexus
Рет қаралды 369 М.
Why I switched back to Intel...
17:16
JayzTwoCents
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
Super gymnastics 😍🫣
00:15
Lexa_Merin
Рет қаралды 106 МЛН