I hope so, too!

Thank you for your kind words and appreciation!

Windows power mode in config low power mode make the CPU use minimal power going down to 3w in idle normal is the same high power make it go above 12w in idle

what did you go with? i havent been able to decide for months

Thank you for your kind words! :)

im thinking i5 13600k with an ARC a770 :P

So true... especially over here in Europe.

Depending on my financial situation, I'll see what I can do in the future. :)

The 13600K often don't go above 115W in high gaming and can go down very often to a 70 90W average in idle Intel is the king for the moment 3w average on the whole lineup has for AMD Im pretty sure it's the fact the 2 cc'd and the IO need to be sync all the time and the latency of not being a single die make it harder to jump the frequency fast down or up

@@jibrilherrcherofhorny4448 That's not how you build a PC. You build a PC for 100% power consumption and just because a game now doesn't max it out, doesn't mean in the future it won't. A friend of a friend has a 3090 and until recently no game pushed his GPU hard, so he was fine, then came hogwarts legacy and his 750W PSU suddenly started switching of or he got terrible performance due to the 3090 downclocking, due to lack of power. Build PCs properly, cool them properly.

@@jibrilherrcherofhorny4448 70-115 watts is still to high, its a damn CPU not a GPU, when modern cpu's like M1 are only using 10-20 watts and giving same performance and zen 3 never exceeding 65 watts even 8 core parts, it shows how intel doesn't care, cause their customers like you are well trained by their marketing..

@@niks660097 at full power the M1 can use up to 80w also the M1 has a lot less function than a x86 chip and their architecture is different and mean for something else most of the time the reason the apple chip don't use more than 20w is because of lack of cooling also all Intel CPU that are not K go mostly not above 100w (5950x did go at 170w) also apple chip are Mobile chip not desktop chip and Intel still on 10nm when apple on 3nm and AMD 5nm I tell said they going down to 7nm and estimate 50% less power usage

I think that PSU would be able to handle it. Might wanna double check it on Reddit or something tho

Waste of time changing from the 5600x, you won't get significant benefits, given you need to also change the motherboard at a minimum, its a total waste of money, your GPU isn't powerful enough for it to matter & dropping in a 5800x3d would give you better bang for buck by the time you factor in motherboard cost

I agree, i have a 5600x with pbo and 3400 c17 ram paired with a 4090. It maxes out my 240hs 1080p and 120hs 4k oled on everygame. Get a better gpu and later down the road maybe a 5800x3d or 5900x. The 5600x is great for gamimg still

Little to no gain in gaming. For other applications they are more performant.

Thank you! I appreciate it. :)

total system power vs cpu only and many use the high performance power plans which prevents the cpu and gpu from idling.

@@pino_de_vogel even on performance my total 6950xt +13600k don't use more than 48 while doing nothing

@@jibrilherrcherofhorny4448 yeah nvidia gpus ahve a bigger gain from balanced mt 10760 used to do 9 vs 110 watts idle if i set it to performance in drivers. my 6900XT does not seem to care anymore. used to with early drivers.

My system (R7 7700 65W + RTX 3060 + DDR5-6200 + 3 SSDs and 2 HDDs) idle at 66W (measured on the power supply cable)... Loking at HWMonitor it indicates that the CPU idle around 25 to 35W... Not too bad given that this CPU uses the chiplet architecture insted of the monolithic one used on AMD laptop CPUs and all current Intel CPUs (monilithic CPUs are much better in idle power, that's why all laptop CPUs are monolithic)... I recently upgraded from my old 4th gen. Intel Xeon E3-1271 v3 (it's an i7-4770k) and that whole Intel system idled at 40W (using the same GPU, SSDs, HDDs). AMD shines when you put load on them, especially if it is a 65W CPU. The "X" CPUs are just bad tunned, they pushed the power and vcore too much to have a little more performance (that's why I didn't buy a 7700X, I got a cheaper 7700 instead, and set the PBO to 75W with undervolt and +250Mhz on the boost clock, my system total power with 100% use on the CPU is around 150W, the CPU itself draws 102W). Taking a 105W AMD CPU and limiting its power to 90W (or less) with undervolt will make it much more power efficient with a very little performance loss on high loads.

@@MCA0090 My whole 9900k+ 6900XT rig idles at 32 watt with 3 ssd 5 fans spinning and 2 hard drives and 3 led strips. my sysstemmi8s idle for 10+ hours a day tho so idle is very important. with gaming the 9900k never goes over 80 watts even tho full load it can boost op to 225 watts (5.1ghz all core)

Consuption and tdp are different. You use 490w but only a part of this power will be transformed to a heat. This part is the TDP. They can measure it in watt or in calories or joules. I think it's better to use calories for the TDP because in this case, use watt is so confuse. Check the video again, 490w is all the conputer not only the cpu

@@MrJohnofficial "You use 490w but only a part of this power will be transformed to a heat" a bit kinetic energy is transformed by the fans and LED's , but mostly thermic energy.

Thank you! :)

Bye ✌️

7800X3D is just overpriced so yes.

Even 13500 is better than 7600x

​@@wahyuetex4594seriously ?? How?

I'm not measuring power consumption using software. I take my measurements directly from the wall in a controlled setting. :)

I'm not sure what's supposed to be "impressive" here. Both Intel and AMD consume way too much power than they should. Both require manual optimization. It's never a good idea to take a specific company's side, be it Intel or AMD... at the end of the day, these are corporations that want money from their consumers. But to each their own.

Stop the cap

numero uno with 1 fps better and 300000000w more plus the price too expensive :d

What about energy bills?!!!!