AT-4 is Really Effective Against the Russian Armour

Рет қаралды 19,376

Жыл бұрын

Sweden, which has been a major player in military technology for many decades, continues its achievements with the Saab Gripen JAS 39E and super stealth Gotland-class submarines.
Today we will talk about another Swedish weapon that has earned its time in the spotlight.
AT-4 has proven its worth numerous times during the Ukrainian war, and made its name heard in a category populated by heavy weights such as Javelin and NLAW.
It may not be as well-known as the RPG-7, but it has achieved a notable presence in popular culture.
This weapon has appeared in a number of films, including Terminator Salvation, where John Connor (Christian Bale) used this one to destroy a disabled Hunter-Killer.
And, allow me to remind you that this was Buffy the Vampire Slayer's preferred missile launcher.
The AT4 is an unguided anti-armor weapon produced by Saab Bofors Dynamics based on Carl Gustaf 8.4cm recoilless rifle.
After modifying the weapon's launch tube bumpers, sights, and slings, the US Army adopted AT4 as the lightweight multipurpose weapon M136.
Join our KZfaq channel by clicking here: bit.ly/3asNo2n
Find us on Instagram: bit.ly/3PM21xW
Find us on Facebook: bit.ly/3t2Huvb
Find us on Twitter: bit.ly/3wQfXzA
Find us on TikTok: bit.ly/3wNsBOu
Get the latest stories: interestingengineering.com/

Пікірлер: 45

@ycplum7062 Жыл бұрын

A soldier can carry a couple of AT-4s while you need a couple of soldiers to carry a Javelin missile and launcher. Both have their uses.

@gregrobertson5576 Жыл бұрын

I love Carl Gustaffs ☺

@jamesnesselrode3155 Жыл бұрын

It's so cool and so scary how you can kill and Destroy Tanks With Just Using A little missle that comes out of a javelin tank kill..

@tbthegr81 10 ай бұрын

Dang that pronounciation of "Förenade Fabriksverken" wasn't half bad

@gilianrampart8514 Жыл бұрын

Should I assume that anti-tank munitions are affective against tanks?

@anticom6099 Жыл бұрын

No, they just don’t believe in tank rights

@onlypeaceindeath Жыл бұрын

It was intended to be used against lighter armored vehicles. Officers of the Swedish Military was apparently slightly shocked at how good it was against heavier armor.

@snoken1000 Жыл бұрын

@@onlypeaceindeath yes we trained to shoot atleast 3 at4 at heavy tanks whith reactive armor like T 90, easy to handle an light so everybody could carry atleast one or more with them on the back.

@CrowColdblade Жыл бұрын

No, the Swedish Army thought it would need 12-15 hits to knock out modern armor. Thats why the NLAW exists. That Russian tanks were so badly protected came as a surprise.

@niclink1030 Жыл бұрын

@@CrowColdblade i dont think the number is right

@bradleyanderson4315 Жыл бұрын

Most armored vehicles aren’t tanks.

@mooneyes2k478 24 күн бұрын

But all tanks are armored vehicles.

@syedafik6487 12 күн бұрын

Rpg-28 and rpg29 can penetrate 700 to 900 mm armored respectively

@uss-usaf-atlantis Жыл бұрын

I am.not Swedish

@mooneyes2k478 5 ай бұрын

Buffy? Might be excused for thinking that it's a "missile launcher". A channel with over a million subs is not. There's nothing "rocket type" about it, it has neither an engine nor any form of steering. There's nothing "missile" about the AT-4, and nothing "rifled" either.

@MarkBerenger 24 күн бұрын

incoherent af lol

@mooneyes2k478 24 күн бұрын

@@MarkBerenger That you didn't watch the video doesn't mean it's "incoherent", it means that you didn't watch the video and so didn't understand it.

@obi-wankenobi5332 5 ай бұрын

visual info is totally inaccurate 😂

@TheShak35 10 ай бұрын

turns out cheap lancet is also really effective against leopards,challengers and soon abrahams

@alexpark2971 7 ай бұрын

At 4 is effective Against Western TanKs???

@Sierrawavemp4 3 ай бұрын

unlikely

@MarkBerenger 24 күн бұрын

yes it is. No tanks are indestructable lol

@uwekonnigsstaddt524 Жыл бұрын

Effective against Abrams and Leopards

@ilovetechnology8436 Жыл бұрын

All so-called captured javelins and nlaws shown on video were expended empty tubes, their effective load was used to send Russian tank turrets sky high.

@looseyourzlf Жыл бұрын

@@ilovetechnology8436 not true. many videos showing the javelin failure's.

@ilovetechnology8436 Жыл бұрын

@@looseyourzlf Alternative realities don't count !

@looseyourzlf Жыл бұрын

@@ilovetechnology8436 are you stupid? kid go play video games. better than talking like that

@nacebedace8243 Жыл бұрын

@@looseyourzlf more videos show its success.

@oldmonk7339 Жыл бұрын

Don't worry captured javelins and nlaws are waiting for leopard and challengers

@montanus5661 Жыл бұрын

Do the Russians have the training needed for the Javelins though?

@FXGreggan. Жыл бұрын

So you're admitting western weapons are superior? Wow

@niclink1030 Жыл бұрын

Dont think they have training for them or the ammo

@JimmyEatDirt 9 ай бұрын

@@montanus5661I don't think russians have training for their own weapons

@carterhaynes8703 2 ай бұрын

Everything is effective against Russian armor

@asithalk 10 ай бұрын

Apparently NATO weapons not good enough to war with Russians..🥴please make better ones.😆

@javir1669 10 ай бұрын

Really?

@asithalk 10 ай бұрын

@@javir1669 no doubt..those weapons suitable for war with Jihadis only!😂😂

@jamesscott2894 6 ай бұрын

Several thousand destroyed and burned Russian tanks and vehicles would disagree with you...