Interpreting M+ Peaks in Mass Spectrometry

  Рет қаралды 242,460

Knowbee

Knowbee

9 жыл бұрын

Visit our website for the notes of this lecture: knowbeetutoring.wordpress.com/
Get private tutoring from anywhere in the world, via your computer, from this instructor. He offers help in Organic Chemistry, General Chemistry, Physics, MCAT, PCAT, and DAT.
SUBMIT AN MCAT PROBLEM AND I WILL SHOW YOU HOW TO SOLVE IT VIA VIDEO. FREE. VISIT WEBSITE FOR DETAILS.
knowbeetutoring.wordpress.com/

Пікірлер: 67
@SandyLucy11
@SandyLucy11 7 жыл бұрын
Thank you, sir. Your explanation was splendid and cleared a lot of my misconception. Thank you!~
@DSnowaws
@DSnowaws 2 жыл бұрын
These are probably the best Mass Spec explanations I’ve ever heard in my life
@khodaniganeli8489
@khodaniganeli8489 6 жыл бұрын
i thought ill never understand mass spectroscopy but i was wrong, thank you Sir!!
@Ajtraytray
@Ajtraytray 5 жыл бұрын
Your explanations are simply amazing. God bless you
@rimshakhan9684
@rimshakhan9684 7 жыл бұрын
thank you sooo much sir. your videos helped me a lot to get these spectroscopic techniques. i must say that u did an excellent job to help students like me :P stay blessed. may you get the best reward for doing these videos :)
@Knowbee
@Knowbee 7 жыл бұрын
Fantastic compliment! Too kind. Made my day!
@victoriableecker8226
@victoriableecker8226 Жыл бұрын
2 minutes into the video I learned more than I did in lecture. Thank you so much
@swadhinchetia2792
@swadhinchetia2792 3 жыл бұрын
Teacher should be like you. Great job. Hoping for more videos. Love from India
@lexibexitextinexi
@lexibexitextinexi 3 жыл бұрын
DUDE DESERVES A MEDAL FOR BEING SO CLEAR
@Sophia-sp7eb
@Sophia-sp7eb Жыл бұрын
this is the first time I understood any concept in o.chem 100%. thank you sir.
@shammahndzalama9731
@shammahndzalama9731 3 жыл бұрын
This has literally helped me to understand this much better ... thank you so much sir God enrochly bless you
@Theperfectblabla
@Theperfectblabla 6 жыл бұрын
Thank you! This helped so much!
@user-tg1en3gk7k
@user-tg1en3gk7k 4 жыл бұрын
Perfect explanation, THANKS ALOT!!
@shushayhagos3190
@shushayhagos3190 6 жыл бұрын
No words , it is great
@rajeshkumarbehera9834
@rajeshkumarbehera9834 5 жыл бұрын
sir it is my luck that i found your video which helped me very much.thank you
@urwabajwa3502
@urwabajwa3502 2 жыл бұрын
Life savour kind of videos🥺❤
@aso1569
@aso1569 5 жыл бұрын
thank you so much 😊 god bless you 🙏🏻
@kavitadumaga1973
@kavitadumaga1973 6 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir.... It help me a lot.. Plzz prepare some more videos on organometallic chemistry
@brenna760
@brenna760 Жыл бұрын
This is an amazing video and I needed it for my final tomorrow so thank you so much!!!!!
@MuhammadNaeem-mm8hk
@MuhammadNaeem-mm8hk 5 ай бұрын
Thanks for the kind video sir. You have made my way of solving the spectroscopic problems very interesting. May you live long sir. ❤
@SonuNigamUnofficial
@SonuNigamUnofficial 6 жыл бұрын
you are the best teacher I HAVE ever come through in my whole Chemistry Studying life... Your are blessed with the ability of teaching tough things like Fairytales ...wow stay healthy and spread knowledge .. you are my favourite ... where to get the links to have chat with you sir .... and lastly What is your name ?? thank u so much
@BilalAhmad-sr5uw
@BilalAhmad-sr5uw 4 жыл бұрын
Sir you gave a lot of knowledge.thankss
@ayeshaasif20asif73
@ayeshaasif20asif73 5 жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation
@romulus2225
@romulus2225 3 жыл бұрын
great video and example sample analysis
@towhidsmail
@towhidsmail 6 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for your well organized and easy explanations. It made my study easy.
@Knowbee
@Knowbee 6 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@shehanai123
@shehanai123 4 жыл бұрын
Jijo2
@krishna795
@krishna795 2 жыл бұрын
This is smooth. Thank you
@sammadsaeed3373
@sammadsaeed3373 6 жыл бұрын
Life saviour!!
@uzmabatool3437
@uzmabatool3437 2 жыл бұрын
Brilliant explanation
@tuck295q
@tuck295q 6 жыл бұрын
I think you might mixed up methyl butane MS with pentane from the previous video. The MS looks more like methyl butane one or am I wrong?
@dhaneeshapb3154
@dhaneeshapb3154 6 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir...
@wgdanmourad
@wgdanmourad 5 жыл бұрын
you are the best
@goodluckgoody1366
@goodluckgoody1366 5 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU VERY MUCH SIR
@Carvel
@Carvel 4 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU!
@mohammadhamza8942
@mohammadhamza8942 4 жыл бұрын
thank youu legend
@abrahamrivera5660
@abrahamrivera5660 4 жыл бұрын
very helpful!
@songohan393
@songohan393 2 жыл бұрын
thank you a lot
@skylersorkin6129
@skylersorkin6129 2 жыл бұрын
thank you thank you thank you thank you
@shammahndzalama9731
@shammahndzalama9731 3 жыл бұрын
Sir if it happens that we dont have m+1 how can we determine the molecular formula?
@akeedasharma4249
@akeedasharma4249 5 жыл бұрын
I have a doubt. I agree that relative intensities of molecular ion peak involving both Br isotopes should be same. The doubt is that why this m+2 peak. Is there for molecular ion peak and for other peaks such as base peak. Why don't we have M+2 base peak of same intensity Pl. Answer
@benjaminhogan3157
@benjaminhogan3157 3 жыл бұрын
BRAVO!!!!!
@amandawramage5865
@amandawramage5865 5 жыл бұрын
I'm confused as to why pentane is displayed on the graph? I thought only ions were displayed? Pentane does not appear to have an electron removed. Can someone please explain??
@Junior-hq3hy
@Junior-hq3hy 3 жыл бұрын
I may be incorrect but the way it works aswell is such that sometimes the whole molecule just becomes an ion due to the way an electron hits the molecule (by just knocking off an electron whilst simultaneously not changing the molecule structure) that’s what they call the parent/molecular ion (in this case pentane)
@zahoorahmad-rt1hl
@zahoorahmad-rt1hl 3 ай бұрын
Due to the presence of different isotopes of an element in a compound, the parents ions responded differently. How about the daughters ions? As the individual parent ion will generate different daughter ions of different m/z values.
@gildebertvonhaargert5327
@gildebertvonhaargert5327 4 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU
@tusharmandge2899
@tusharmandge2899 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir
@ayeshasiddiqua2607
@ayeshasiddiqua2607 3 жыл бұрын
Plz explain what will be the relative intensity of m m+2 m+4 peaks for 2Cl if present instead of Br
@dimitrisgkiousas8928
@dimitrisgkiousas8928 Жыл бұрын
super!!
@thomasmuntzer1004
@thomasmuntzer1004 4 жыл бұрын
But is there not a Chance that there are molekus that have 81br and 13C? So they weigh 125? By the way thank you very much!
@rameshbanothu1058
@rameshbanothu1058 5 жыл бұрын
Tnq sir
@mukesh2400
@mukesh2400 2 жыл бұрын
super
@kondwanimwafulilwa5521
@kondwanimwafulilwa5521 3 жыл бұрын
👏👏
@drbalvindertalwar4749
@drbalvindertalwar4749 2 жыл бұрын
👍
@nazlikianersi727
@nazlikianersi727 3 жыл бұрын
it was usefull
@fenfentang2263
@fenfentang2263 6 жыл бұрын
can anyone tell me that why secondary has more relative abundance than primary?
@joanazanchetti228
@joanazanchetti228 5 жыл бұрын
because its more stable
@mohammada4523
@mohammada4523 3 жыл бұрын
What the fuck this is amazing, thank you so so so so so so so so so so so fucking much
@s.k.sameer2219
@s.k.sameer2219 6 жыл бұрын
Where 0.055 value come plz someone help me????
@girlish911
@girlish911 6 жыл бұрын
were trying to see how tall the M+1 peak is compared to the M Peak, so we mark our M peak as being 100% (it is 100% of its own height) we took the height of the M+1 peak (by viewing the vertical axis in this spectroscopy -in this case, we cant see it) and we divided it by the height of the M peak. That number is where the 0.055 is where that number comes from
@koningA
@koningA 4 жыл бұрын
5 carbons = 5 x 0.011 = 0.055 (Natural abundance of C-13 is 0.011 % ). Because the chance on 2 C-13 is negligible (0.0001%) this peak wasn't shown.
@s.k.sameer2219
@s.k.sameer2219 6 жыл бұрын
Why value pridict0.055......
@comedydiary5988
@comedydiary5988 6 жыл бұрын
It's a given value for each isotope...
@shyamdedaniya2056
@shyamdedaniya2056 3 жыл бұрын
literally great explanation than useless university PhD Professor
@namae270
@namae270 4 жыл бұрын
why isnt the M+1 ion due to hydrogen isotopes? how exactly do you guys know m+1 peak is due to carbon isotopes?
@kuashaahmed7513
@kuashaahmed7513 4 жыл бұрын
I need answer to this too.
@chemistrysmystery8467
@chemistrysmystery8467 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir
Mass Spectrometry Fragmentation Part 1
24:11
Knowbee
Рет қаралды 374 М.
Introduction to IR Spectroscopy: How to Read an Infrared Spectroscopy Graph
9:05
The Complete Guide to Everything
Рет қаралды 396 М.
КАРМАНЧИК 2 СЕЗОН 7 СЕРИЯ ФИНАЛ
21:37
Inter Production
Рет қаралды 506 М.
아이스크림으로 체감되는 요즘 물가
00:16
진영민yeongmin
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
WHO DO I LOVE MOST?
00:22
dednahype
Рет қаралды 82 МЛН
Isotopes in Mass Spectrometry (A level chemistry)
6:11
Learning with Philimon
Рет қаралды 316
Quads and Traps:  Introduction
48:37
AutoVectis Suite - Mass Spectrometry
Рет қаралды 11 М.
Introduction to NMR Spectroscopy Part 1
23:05
Knowbee
Рет қаралды 574 М.
Mass Chromatograms
16:34
ShortChemistry
Рет қаралды 24 М.
Introduction to Mass Spectrometry
20:04
Knowbee
Рет қаралды 490 М.
Finding the molecular formula from a mass spectrum
17:33
Gary Mabbott
Рет қаралды 443 М.
NMR spectroscopy visualized
6:49
ScienceSketch
Рет қаралды 295 М.
Introduction to Infrared Spectroscopy
15:33
Knowbee
Рет қаралды 448 М.
Mass spectrometry for proteomics - part one
23:00
Matt Padula
Рет қаралды 165 М.
КАРМАНЧИК 2 СЕЗОН 7 СЕРИЯ ФИНАЛ
21:37
Inter Production
Рет қаралды 506 М.