"Europe has always been diverse" Anyone saying this is being blatantly disingenuous and they know it.

So, europeans are actually being replaced, ...but the theories that say that europeans are actually being replaced, ...are conspiratorial.

1% immigration year on year is actually massive

"Europeans need more people for their economies" "Why its bad for the environment to have kids" "Europe needs migrants for the economy" Can someone please explain why young european men must pay taxes to support migrant men and women, as well as single migrant mothers with 4 kids?

The great replacement isn’t a theory,it’s a fact and it’s happening right infront of our eyes

Remember, whatever the official figures are, the real number is higher than that.

From my personal experience in school, most were non germans, but, especially a lot of turks had german passport, while hating on germany and being insane turkish patriots. So those would show up as just german in statistics.

Strange death of Europe

If you walk in the streets of London, it is as if you are walking in an Indian city

What people forget is that migrants tend to be young and visible on the streets while the established population tends to be older. So, yes, there are "only" 16% non European people, but in schools it's often 50/50 or sometimes 80/20 non Europe to established. Averages are misleading also, migrants tend to stick together and if they don't get broken up like in Denmark, you will have Ghettos.

I love how in the beginning you called the Great Replacement a “theory” but meanwhile you read stats to back up everything that’s its saying. The number one name in London is Muhammad, as opposed to an English name. And you telling me the Great Replacement is a lie?

we are betrayed by our leaders- the generations after us will suffer for their folly

The future for Europe is bitter inter-ethnic conflict. The change has been far too rapid.

You don't even need to ask for EU or non EU in the UK You can simply look at statistics of people who arrived within the last decade to see how extreme migration is England already has a sizeable Pakistani population yet they achieved the same amount of migration of 51 years in just 14 months Democracy is a joke not only can people get citizenship at a faster rate and be able to vote but just one government can make irreversible changes

I was born in Italy , EU politics changed everything , even isolated villages are full of foreigners..I miss old Italy very much.

Again this guy pretending immigration from third world countries isn't actually a problem, the level of denial of reality is staggering.

"replacmnt is a conspiracy theory" "ok, demographic change is happening but that's a good thing" "ok, this is bad but honestly who cares anymore just live with it"

I'm so sick of the term minority and it being applied in western countries There is no minority how can you even live in a major city among the youth and call people who are the visible majority everywhere you go a minority

I believe that immigration from Muslim-majority countries is less likely to integrate successfully into the EU compared to immigrants from other regions. However, with such high rates of immigration, there's a concern that the native population and their cultural heritage could be wipe out.

11:54 the migration crisis is exactly the reason that the data on the subject has decreased

Europe needs to be saved

87% doesn't want them. We're to different culturally. I do not wish to see Europe changed to become a third world place.

1 in 4 are foreigners in Ireland this has happened in the last 2 yrs, some places are minority Irish. Soon it will be 2 in 4 and that's it for the Irish.

The Dutch figures can be misleading. The third generation is considered the 'native Dutch'. So there are more people of color than there are on paper. I am Dutch and I am colored. I am third generation of Indonesian descent. My parents were born in the Netherlands, both my grandparents in the former Dutch East Indies on Java and the Moluccas. After Indonesia's independence, approximately 350,000 inhabitants migrated to the Netherlands in 1950. Currently there are between 1.5 and two million people with an Indonesian background. Most of them are third and fourth generation, but are registered as native. The first major migration flows in the Netherlands were mainly the result of decolonization and started after the Second World War between 1950 and 1965. After the Netherlands lost the Dutch East Indies and Dutch New Guinea, many different ethnic groups came to the Netherlands from the Indonesian archipelago. These were the Javanese, Moluccans, Chinese, Papuans and the mixed race. When Suriname became independent, approximately 300,000 Surinamese came to the Netherlands in the 1970s. This was also a very diverse ethnic population consisting of Africans (desc. former slaves), Indians, Javanese, native Indians and Chinese. Then there are also the Dutch Caribbean islands, Aruba, Curacao, Bonaire, Sint Maarten, Saba and Sint Eustatius. These are also all mixed population groups, where the Dutch used to mix with slaves and native Indians. But all these communities from the former colonies are reasonably integrated into Dutch society. They have a more Western upbringing and know Dutch norms and values. Migration in the Netherlands went wrong due to the massive influx of guest workers from Morocco and Turkey. I don't blame the first and second generations for their failure in Dutch society, this was more due to the Dutch government that did not want them to integrate. After all, they were guest workers. There are currently more than a million Muslims in the Netherlands, mostly brides from Turkey and Morocco and many asylum seekers from conflict countries, which are mostly Islamic countries.

This analysis is basically impossible in Portugal because thr constitution makes it illegal to figure this stuff out. Only question you're allowed to ask is if the person is of Portuguese citizenship or not.

If you want to support the making of more videos like this one, join the Into Europe Patreon: www.patreon.com/IntoEurope

Are you just realizing this now? 😂 It's been a problem for decades here! Especially after 2015

I love how the Great Replacement is somehow a conspiracy but at the same time in the same video and not even 10 seconds apart, you admit it's happening

Did any native european asked for his country to change forever in any aspect just in a few decades? I don't think that ever happened so why is it happening then who asked for this

The end of the most developed, rich, fair, equal civilization of all times. RIP Europe.

Europe is gonna have a Yugoslav scenario!

Historically the US used to be about 88% European. Now we are somewhere like 65%, but actually I think it's much less, probably around 50% at this point. So look at what is happening to us, and you will see what will happen to you.

I love how the two Danish squares representing two parents procreated and a small baby square popped out

This doesnt take non-citizens into account? What about the mio of refugees who dont have citzenship. And dont forget immigration will rise even higher in the coming years.

says the replacement theory is a conspiracy theory then proceeds to elaborate it in detail

Censuses on race and ethnic origin were banned by the French government in 1978. Meaning that the data vailable its just by location, this in order to avoid discrimination

Props for doing this video, touching this subject is pretty brave on your part.

import the 3 world, become the 3 world.

Personally what I fear is these groups forming their own separte political parties. And becoming keys to power in a polarized political system.

Depressing that so many cultures are being wiped out

Oh boy, I can't wait for the comments

Should probably keep Europe European, given it’s the last majority European place on Earth by birth and every other major race has their own homogeneous homeland.

Clear them out.

Stop the floodgates.

Migration in itself isn't a problem...the problem arises when you're either not able to assimilate the newborn second generations because they are too concentrated in certain areas where the natives have virtually disappeared (like the French banlieues or certain parts of Sweden, Belgium and the UK) or when they don't want to assimilate because they don't agree with the core values of the country they are living in...or both

it’s ridiculous that it is considered controversial to talk about this, even more the fact that the information available is so limited. Let’s hope the new migration pact gets these issues under control and lets us get a clearer picture of what is actually coming into our countries.

And yet media and politicians call noticing this a "conspiracy theory"

Interesting how the options are either a growing separate community, or intermarrying, but just closing the border and deporting at least some of the invader populations are not considered. You can't come up with the best solutions when the best options are already ruled out as possibilities.

Inserting Annakin and Padme meme: - "For the better right?' "...", "Right?"

It is told very cautiously... I don't understand why people in Western Europe are particularly so cautious about sharing data...

But the question is, can Europeans migrate to Saudi Arabia, Arab Gulf States, and Pakistan without being jailed or stoned or beheaded?

The initial data cannot be correct. Only in Spain, in 2023, the net immigration was around 700k individuals (1.200.000 immigrants and around 500.000 emigrants). So it is not possible that the net immigration of the whole of EU in 2022 was only 1.200.000 individuals. Also, the data of foreign-born people in Spain is not correct. You are displaying the percentage of Spanish population that does not have the Spanish nationality, which is around 15%. However, because of how easy it is to get the Spanish nationality for latinamericans, there are may latinamericans in Spain holding the Spanish citizenship that were born abroad. If you look into the percentage of people in Spain born abroad, regardless of nationality, is closer to 19%. I can provide links to the official Spanish statistics if needed.

My area has been destroyed by immigrants - and they are horrible. Farsta Strand STOCKHOLM Sweden

Before the 1990s Ireland attracted very few immigrants and Irish people were much more likely emigrate to the UK, USA and Canada. Since then our economy has rapidly developed and as the video shows we now have a huge foreign born population. As a student in Dublin, I went to school with kids from all over the world, yet ironically due to the high cost of living expenses many young Irish people continue to emigrate to Australia

In Spain it's literally 1/3rd of births which are comprised of non-natives or mixed

As an Indian, I don't like where Europe is heading. Europe has its own distinct culture and I would like it to remain that way.

no reason i should support this as a white person

TLDR: the great replacement doesn’t happen, and if it does, here’s why it’s actually a good thing.

Well done. It is somewhat shocking to see that so many countries do not even have any data on the subject. How do we plan to address topics such as improved "integration" when we do not even know the situation?

In Frankfurt Germany more than 1/2 kids are brown. Non EU immigrants in Czecho Slovakia are fine cause are still Slavs(means white)

*This was being said by the AIt Right back in 2015 but no one listened*

I believe that none of those countries are facing problems as severe as those in Turkey. Not to mention the struggling economy, but also the significant influx of Syrians and Afghans into the country. Every now and then, European countries attempt to enhance Turkey's buffer state role (e.g., Meloni, etc.). The government is content with this arrangement because it receives funds from the EU (even though these do not cover all costs), but pro-European (not necessarily pro-EU) Turks are dissatisfied with it. They are concerned about how their country is changing, how the culture is being affected, and how taxes are increasingly directed towards newcomers. As a result, far-right parties are gaining traction in an effort to protect our demographics. I would like to emphasize that we, as a country, do not have a history of migration, and the programs to integrate migrants are insufficient. Unfortunately, the majority of the refugees are middle-aged Afghan males, about whose backgrounds and possible affiliations with organizations in their country we know nothing. People fear a civil war. Please do not interpret this as racism; it is simply an attempt to protect the future of our country. Additionally, both Afghans and Syrians are employed under very poor conditions, which is also unacceptable.

And these changes are happening so fast! Shameful that European countries aren't even collecting proper data on that. As if having 50% of the population of, say, African or Arab descent had no negative consequence...

Why would anyone be in favor of this?

Spain 🇪🇸 is also experiencing an important change in its demographics due to the increase in immigration, especially in Madrid, Catalonia, Valencia, and even in smaller cities like where I live, Valladolid (Castilla y León). The immigration that comes to Spain comes mainly from Hispanic America (Colombia 🇨🇴, Venezuela 🇻🇪, Ecuador 🇪🇨, Dominican Republic 🇩🇴, Cuba 🇨🇺...), Africa (Morocco 🇲🇦, Senegal 🇸🇳, Mali 🇲🇱, Algeria 🇩🇿, Mauritania 🇲🇷, Guinea 🇬🇳...) and Eastern Europe (Romania 🇷🇴, Bulgaria 🇧🇬, Ukraine 🇺🇦…) and although I think they have adapted better than in other European countries (such as France 🇫🇷 or Sweden 🇸🇪), there are also some problems that the government must solve so that immigration is sustainable and attractive to attract talent from other countries.

Great video, but the volume on the "scribling" sound when things are drawn on the screen is way too high and louder than the voice over, it surprised me.

Thank you for your work on this. It is outstanding and knocks the work of other reporters into a cocked-hat, and I think I will have to watch it several times to give it proper consideration. I look forward to your video on ethnically-linked values.

It's literally illegal to do those data collections in GERMANY like the UK does. I was shocked how specific my uncle needed to specify his "race" in a simple NHK form.

We consider someone born outside and comes here a migrant. But even if that person mixes with natives, the children are not considered native, and even if that person gets together with a native, their children are still not considered natives. Its then only natural that native population technicly decreases, because everything that nots descendent of 2 natives, is not considered native

With France many of those 3rd generation North African immigrants are partial descendants of French colonists who settled in these places. Also what does France do about people from overseas departments like Martinique, Guadeloupe, & French Guiana who's populations are overwhelmingly Black/Afro Caribbean. Since they are French citizens since their lands are seen as part of France are they counted as native in their own lands? What if they move to Metropolitan France like tons do? are they still counted as native?

All the praises to you for making this video as good and unbias as it is! Looking into this stuff can feel like diving down as deep as you can, only to realize that when you almost reached the bottom of this you don't have enough air to swim back up and you drown in it...

Even though I tend to be socially international, I tend to realise that fact, that European society works only within a certain cultural homogeneity of the native ethnolinguistic population. Many people think, that internationalism means to overcome nationality entirely, while I believe, that internationalism simply translates towards a sort of brotherhood amongst nations. Cosmopolitan and neoliberal societies, mainly Berlin, London or Paris seem to struggle more, than local or national governmental organisations that are homogenous. We should be internationalist, but in oder to be so, you need to value your own nation as well.

You cant build Europe without europeans.

This video must have been incredibly time consuming. Thank you for such a great work.

One thing that need to be clarified about France (idk for other countries) is that lots of ppl who are ETHNICALLY non-european aren't immigrants. My own grandfather is african, he was born there in the late 1940s in AEF (french Africa) meaning he was born french. As a citizen of France he moved to the mainland to get to the university. Therefore even if my family has non-european background, we aren't immigrants because all of them were born french.

So the slow replacement is real…

You are very brave for leaving the comments on. I am going to enjoy reading them.

thank you for making this video, it is sad and scary how this type of research is actively being censored

It's so over

Knowledge of the plan is derided as "conspiracy theory" until the plan is complete. Then yeah, they'll admit it was a thing.

The Danish Statistical Bureau was criticized when people found out that it defines "ethnic Danes" as any Danish state citizen born in DK. That could explain the otherwise puzzling birth statistic at 6:24.

I wonder what happens when you add up all the stats over the years and calculate the rate per year and total sum of all the years 🤔

how is that a conspiracy? you can see it with your own eyes...

Nothing is permanent.

2:29 The Ireland stats are skewed upwards as the UK has left the EU so all Northern Irish born count as Non-EU but they’re still Northern Irish and mostly Irish citizens, not from a non-European country or even foreign citizens.

Really nice data analysis and presentation, impressive!

The Danish analysis may have a minuscule flaw. If someone from a "Western" country were to immigrate to Denmark and they're ethnically not European, they would be omitted observations. Also, America doesn't consider foreign-born individuals in the same way as the EU. In the EU, if a child's parents are French, and they give birth in Spain, the child is now a foreign-born individual. America has citizenship on birth, which means only the actual individuals born abroad are mentioned.

We need to boost our fertility rates. Hope people in the comments are having enough children. I've 4.

Hugecrespect gor not seeking a sponser for more controversial topics! Also, i just wanted to say that you handled this specific topic very well

🇩🇪☦️We will rise again Amen☦️🇩🇪

Remember to vote for nationalist parties for the EP-election June 9th. We all have to leave the failed EU! *Detain🛡Deport🚨Repatriate✈Make Europe european again!✊🏻*

2nd and 3rd generation are not included given that the numbers lift dramatically, frightening!

3:32 - what is this "other" group, if it's not native, EU or non-EU?

I'm so conflicted about this. I live in a European country. My father is native to this coutnry and my mother is from a different , hispanic country. I look a little more like my mothers side. When I walk the streets of my country I feel like a foreigner, I feel like people look at me as an immigrant. I want to tell them im not , that I am part of this country. I also cannot deny the negative impact mass immigration is doing to this country. These issues are destroying my relationship with my country as people will grow in ignorance and hatred and anything that resembles a darker skin tone will be equated to as an immigrant.

I mean WHAT kind of difference is between and Argentinian or Chilean and a Spaniard? Would it be marginally more than the differences from someone from Asturias and someone from Andalucía? all native Spanish speakers, Christian (and Catholic) in general and up to a point with shared history besides the % degree of European descent the immigrants from south America have in their blood. I think I heard G. Meloni of all people speaking about why not promoting Venezuelan migrants from reaching Italy instead of sub-saharan Africans and Arab Muslims for the "assimilation" easiness. In the end what is an European, is it skin color more relevant than culture and religion or not? would and Italian prefer a black person from the Dominican Republic that speaks a Latin dialect similar to Italian and is already probably from a Christian and Catholic background than an Islamic black person from Nigeria? what if is a catholic Christian from Nigeria too. Will the whole of Europe stablish categories of citizenship ? classes of immigrants by degree of cultural separation ?

The marriage stats are really interesting.

Europe can reverse the trend. 1. You have to reduce welfare dependence. Pensions, Access to aid and care. 2. You must divest extraction based ownership in Non-European countries. 3. You have to revise One Drop rules. 4. Stop supporting Dictators in foreign lands. 5. Strongly discourage public mutli-cultural displays of any kind (Depending on your countries.) You can't play favorites here. So, you can't have "Asia day" or "Africa Day" or Any other country being represented. It has to be solely based on the nation it is in. 6. Compulsory education for all migrants upon arrival. The goal is to integrate people quickly over 2-3 generations. 7. Divest from a Pan-Europeanism, you have to be singularly Anti-EU. 8. Migrants have to do 2-4 years of public service on arrival before any welfare participation. 9. Divest from US based global leadership. Europe itself is emulating the US in too many ways and it's not built to last. 10. Don't allow Migrant enclaves to develop. 11. Women's education of all migrants (This reduces birth rates considerably than any contraception or pogrom.) 12. Re-invest in local education, any person on assistance has to be in classes 13. Reduce English/French as a secondary language (There are obviously more points but I'll keep it at 13 for now.) What this will do I believe is a few things: First it will disincentivize migration without some type of service, getting access to easy aid. You do time in said country, wether it be it's peace corps, or health service, or armed forces, it encourages national unity over tribe membership. Make becoming the citizen the ultimate goal. Points systems do this well enough, in 4 generations you can start unfucking the situation. You also have to reduce EU integration broadly as larger programs are fueled and pushed in this way. Compulsory education will also increase integration and focusing on values. It's the larger conglomerates that are creating this issue, many of which created conditions in which people had left. EU/US led invasion of Iraq, Afghanistan led to Arab Spring, which led to the dissolution of backed dictatorships, additionally extractive based companies with bad work practices make people leave local areas. The same with Europe propping up crack-pot dictators which leads to large emigration from these nations. But this also means that you get less stuff (Phones, High-End Tech at cheap prices) The price of keeping Europe intact is changing your economic models and the way compensation is led. It's not by mistake that Eastern Europe is more homogeneous than it's western counterparts (Maybe communism did save you guys from the worst of the 60's.) Each of these things will lead people to stay in their own nations more, and focus on developing their industries naturally. The extraction based models, Dictatorships that are upheld, US supported mis-adventures created the shitpot you're in right now, in the name of standards of living. It's growth at all costs mindset that leads to people coming en-masse, it's creating a situation where the nation is absolutely cucked where young men aren't going to just stay home. What this means for you: You won't make as much as your parents or grandparents would for a couple generations, you will have to do jobs you hate (Picking fruit, Cleaning the toilets) You won't get access to the latest and greatest technologies (Reduced AI, reduced Robotics etc) And you have to abandon Growth at all costs Capitalism. You might have to look at 5 year plans in the meanwhile. Also you won't be able to retire. You have to do complete divestment from extractive based foreign policy (Natural resources) So you won't be getting cheap food grown elsewhere, nor will you have access to exotic consumerism. Also you'll have to change how many people can emigrate from passports (Not issuing as many) What this means for immigrants coming in: You'll have to put skin in the game, not just in paying taxes, but actual national service. You'll unfortunately have to swear allegiance to the new nation, and you cannot opt out of a pathway towards citizenship. Service is mandatory to get access to anything including owning property. You must go into education/Student work a few hours a week, until you can have b-2 level fluency of the language, and a secondary education understanding of culture and history. Mandatory participation of national events (Independence days, religious holidays) US based: You won't get European support for wars unless it directly impacts European homelands and the relationship should be bilateral not EU/US but local country and US for defense. That means you'll have to remove missiles, bases, ships, personnel of all sorts from Europe. Complete Dissolution of NATO. Reduction of foreign interest in Europe. EU base: You must increase defense and interior spending by 5% year to year. My vision is long term, not just in 10 years, but 100 years from now. Europe has to get a hard reset on where it is, which means everything is on the table, trade agreements, EU centric policies, domestic welfare, Banking, commerce. Tough times make strong people. You have to force yourself into austerity, and ween yourself of easy foreign capital.

Some interesting questions to ask oneself: • As mentioned in the video, why are reliable statistics on the largest & most rapid demographic shift in human history so difficult to find & access? • When did the populations of any of these “democratic” nations vote to subject themselves to the largest & most rapid demographic change in human history? • Which benefits have been provided to the host nations by said largest & most rapid demographic shift in human history? • Why is voicing opposition to the largest & most rapid demographic shift in human history (definitionally an “extremist” policy) labelled “extremist” itself?

As an American, I think that whether the immigrates adopt the culture of the country they migrate to or try to keep their own is critical. Through out American history, its success is that immigrates adopted American values. If that happens in Europe all is ok. If not Europe is in for a lot of trouble.

Not in eastern europe