Yep satanic in the extreme.

There was no opening ceremony of CERN and you fell for a silly fake.

@@TheSilmarillian That ceremony was the opening of a railway tunnel that hasn't anything to do with CERN at all! It's not even nearby. But it demonstrates that you don't fact check anything and therefore believe everything as long as it fits your worldview... (And I highly doubt you're familiar with the regional folklore and legends to understand what the artistic performance at the tunnel opening actually referenced.)

@@Axxe80 If you say so.

What a weak reply.@@TheSilmarillian

Valid point indeed I had never thought of that and have been banging on about cern for decades, nice 1.

@@TheSilmarillian Thanx 4 that! I have a few more observations that poke little holes in some of CERNS methods or explainations of findings but I dont like always feeling like ' that guy ' !

Dear Lucy, they are not smashing together atoms! They are smashing together Protons, which right after the big bang would have been so hot that they would be smashing into each other at *relativistic speeds*, just like is happening here! What we learn is the types and amounts of other particles like Neutrinos, Anti-Protons, etc. that come off of those collisions, which helps to know what percentage of particles we see in the universe may be from the Big Bang vs. less-hot things like internal solar fusion. Plus Higgs Boson stuff, which is beyond my physics education. You are absolutely correct that heavier atoms could not exist right after the big bang, because the relativistic protons would have blasted them apart. Actually the most common Hydrogen isotope is just one Proton and one Electron, and without the electron you could just call it a hydrogen ion, so another way to think about Proton Beams is as a Hydrogen (+)Ion Beam.

Let's all PLEASE understand that, "What I don't get" is very clearly "gotten" by the people who are most intimately involved with this group of experiments.

If anyone has any questions about potential theory holes they have found, I'm happy to answer them! That is the entire purpose of peer review in science

You know, you comment makes more sense than anything else

You have an overboarding phantasy, because CERN has never said that - you just made that up. Of course they know what could and what could not happen - that's why they know that it is not possible to cause something "affecting humanity" in the way you mean it. And they never said anything about "magic" - quick reminder: that is the absurdity you are believing but not them. And 3 year olds can differentiate between fiction on a TV screen and reality - in contrast to you, as it seems that you take those sensationalist videos that all happend "just 3 minutes ago" for face value.

🤦‍♂

It is.

Nope they're working on the big boom coming up

@@alexmangrum90 No they don't.

What a great way to rationalize your lack of learning something new.

The narrators are forced by public relations "experts" to destroy the intelligibility, especially for those for whom English is not the first language. There is a trick, turn off sound, and turn under titling on.

​@@dougholliday467some ppl learn different, perhaps the background noise is a distraction? No need to insult, not all brains receive information the same.

The NFL alone in the US has an annual revenue of about $18.6 Billion. The Large Hadron Collider cost $4.75 Billion over 10 years. That's one sport in one country for one year, vs. the global scientific community for a decade. Seems like a better investment to my mind.