The editing in your video is terrible. It looks like some ten year old's creation attempting to show off every trick in the book all at once. It greatly reduces the quality of your video. Also, particles and agreements? Discuss science, please.

MAGNETISM: See item #2 below: THEORY OF EVERYTHING IDEA: Revised TOE: 1/24/2024: TOE Idea: Short version: (currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test): The 'gem' photon is the eternally existent energy unit of this universe. The strong and weak nuclear forces are derivatives of the electromagnetic ('em') interactions between quarks and electrons. The nucleus is a magnetic field boundary. 'Gravity' is a part of electromagnetic radiation, gravity acting 90 degrees to the 'em' modalities, which of course act 90 degrees to each other. TOE Idea: Longer version: (currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test): THE SETUP: 1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism. 2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.). 3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them. 4. Quarks, protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them. 5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them. FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO: 6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field. 7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field. 8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality. 9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between quarks and electrons. In the case of the alpha particle (Helium nucleus), the electro-magnetic field interactions between the quarks themselves are what keeps them together in that specific structural format. 10. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do. (The neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.) 11. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary. THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA: 12. At this time, I personally believe that what is called 'gravity' is a part of electromagnetic radiation, gravity acting 90 degrees to the 'em' modalities, which of course act 90 degrees to each other. 'Gravity' is the force which allows a photon to travel across the vast universe without that swirling photon being flung apart or ripped apart by other photons and/or matter interactions. Gravity being a part of the 'em' photon could also possibly be how numbers exist in this existence for math to do what math does in this existence (the internal oscillations of the 3 different parts of the 'gem' photon, each modality having a maximum in one direction, a neutral, and a maximum in the other direction.) 13. I also believe that the 'gem' photon is the energy unit in this universe that makes up everything else in this universe, including space and time. ('Space' being energy itself, the 'gem' photon, 'Time' being the flow of energy, 'Space Time' being energy and it's flow). 14. When these vibrating 'gem' photons interact with other vibrating 'gem' photons, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe. 15. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate. 16. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure. 17. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons). THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY: 18. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up. 19. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency. 20. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies. NOTES: 21. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 22. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 23. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well. 24. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. 25. 'God' does not actually exist except for as a concept alone. The singular big bang theory is a fairy tale for various reasons. The CMBR from the supposed 'bang' should be long gone by now and should not even be able to be seen by us. Red Shift observations have a more 'normal' already known physics explanation, no dark energy nor dark matter needed. The universe always existed in some form and never had a beginning and will most probably never have an end. Galaxies collapse in upon themselves, 'bang', eventually generating new galaxies. Galaxies and 'life' just come and go in this eternally existent existence. DISCLAIMER: 26. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty. Currently, my gravity test has to be accomplished to prove or disprove that portion of the TOE idea. But, if not this way, then what exactly is the TOE of this existence?

The physics of the magnetism involved in dowsing with the modern light weight ball bearing dowsing have been reverse engineered in the book: The Art of Dowsing - Separating Science from Superstition ($14.95). by Michael Fercik. All element's atoms emit a unique electromagnetic microwave band frequency with no two elements having the same. The same element's electromagnetic microwave band frequency that is contained in an elemental mass band together to produce the unique elemental magnetic flux lines with no two elements having the same. The modern light weight ball bearing dowsing rod is the only dowsing rod in the world that precisely gauges the dowsing of all edges, exact center, depth buried with angle of deposition, and most important is grading. This is accomplished by pitting the energy of gravity against the energizing of the one-tenth ounce dowsing rod load that is taped onto the 16 inch long acetylene welding rod, with being located 5 inches from the hub's shaft. The tip of the acetylene welding rod is raised five & a half inches based off the level of the dowsing rod's top rim. There is much more physics involved than this post can state. Become a professional dowser by practicing the book's dowsing lessons taught. Watch for our KZfaq channel starting March 2024 ----- Tracy and Michael's Dowsing Adventure.

Thank you for providing references and a peer reviewed paper. O7

My reply is not a joke please look at it. Sorry it's kinda long but it's worth it.

Thanks for the feedback. I was trying something different to see how it worked.

Oh poor you, your free content isn't your way.

I agree that editing should be lessened to make it more tasteful

😂😂😂

This is typical behavior, when the mind can not focus upon the material, it becomes bored and searches for great understood stimuli. Obviously, the more exciting behavior here, was to troll for negative attention. Must have strayed away from the fart noises and cat videos again.

TY. i came here LOOKING for this comment. 😂

Metaphysics. Yes. Not science.

That wasn't the only weird typo in this video!

Hahaha. Three guesses why I'm in the comments, two don't count

Yeah there is a mistake there in the captions. Sorry for that.

@@ScienceDiscussed Sue the Captions. 🔪

Metaphysics!!! Be careful: you'll make the Materialists of Scientism pee their pants!

@@phineascromwell Whoa i wet my pants already

No mistake to many of us. Quantum anything is nonsense that has never been proven in applied physical experiments, including the double slit. “Einstein's relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists.” -Nikola Tesla

I also thought of that. I use to live only 10 blocks away from the coral castle in Leasure City when i was in high school in the 70s and I remember learning how he used electro magnetic properties in his equipment and it totally fascinated me.

Thanx Ed...

I didn't really understand or fully appreciate Ed's description when I first read his book about magnetism, but I was always fascinated by it along with what he was able to achieve in our earthly realm. A few years back I gained a new found appreciation for the Electromagnetic Force, and a lot of the mysteries suddenly made a lot more sense. Sadly, they've bastardized "the "science*"..."* to severely downplay, if not outright ignore, The Electromagnetic Force's role throughout ALL of Nature. So now most of us are entirely clueless.., about the very same Force that literally Powers ALL of our electronic devices, many of which are designed to distract further from the Truth. Ed left us with a Legacy, that was hard to deny, but inspired many to wonder in awe, no matter how hard they tried to distract us. One day, I started reading a book about Electricity, trying to learn more about the trade, beyond just running simple circuits. Before I could even get through the first few pages.., something fascinating left me in a state of wonder. Instead of reading about wires, gauges, and what-not, the opening paragraph was describing Electricity's role in Nature. Along with this came a very simple description of what Electricity technically is: A flow of charged particles. Flash forward a few years, several thoughts later, there was a necessity to learn a lot more about the Physics behind The Electromagnetic Force. Eventually leading me to great minds like Faraday and Maxwell, and the spectacular contributions they've made, to allow us the luxuries of a world plagued by all these electronic devices. Despite the never-ending distractions, we have a wealth of information at our fingertips, waiting to be tapped into, to further both the individual and the collective, far faster than ever before. Did you know, a current of electricity will generate a magnetic field? Or that flux in a magnetic field will induce an electric current? What is Electricity then, if not for Magnetism? Yet, what is a magnetic.., if not for Electricity? The Realms are not blurred, but rather based. The relationship demonstrated by the Right Hand Rule (and Left Hand Rule too) exhibit the appropriate perpendiculars that account for the polarity of all three dimensions of observable space. Thus, explaining the Reality in which we all live, but many will choose to obliviously ignore. When you understand there are Reasons behind what Ed was capable of achieving, the man not only had a great way of attempting to explain the True Nature of Reality, but also did so in a manner in which it made it rather difficult for this world to simply ignore. Glad to see his Legacy still lives on

@@michaelshultz2540 The dipole effect. Wal Thornhill explained gravity as a by-product of the MUCH more Powerful Electromagnetic Force. It makes a lot of sense, especially considering the fact that the dipole effect can be exhibited experimentally using a parallel plate capacitor. This is what we have with our Earth. The surface of our Earth acts as one "plate", but exists as a three dimensional object, encompassing the whole of the sphere. The second "plate" can be thought of as the ionosphere, applying a relatively steady positive charge from high up above, which maintains a voltage potential between up there and the whole of our sphere. Fluctuations in the relative charge being Applied to the whole of the sphere will thus result in variables observed within the "force*" of "gravity". Just imagine what one person could do, if only... Not sure if Ed knew, but difficult to deny what he was able to do ;)

@@mastersoftheelectricuniverse how come planets without atmosphere still have gravity?

Multiple stacks of different twist angles can lead to completely different physics. So we don't know what would happen for this material. I am sure we will know this in the next couple of years though.

Magic angle graphene sheets will do this because of 3 resonance pairs of electrons exist in each unit cell. If you have them at an angle the energy will flow easier in one direction than the other. Also the material is superconducting in the plane of the atomic lattice. When you have two sheets at an angle you get an effect called tunneling that completes the circuit making the material magnetic.

Monopole .magnetism will solve magnetic spaceflight. See Q.FFF THEORY.

@@lvuyk2408 Hail!

So infact it is a permanent magnet, that can be switched off and on, using electricity or a particle as a "domino" switch, depending on how the dominoes are placed, and where in this pattern electricity is added, they can flip in a one by one sequence, or more dominoes at the same time ?

1. It does demonstrate ferromagnetism so it will be possible to see domains in this material. It is hard to say where and when we will see these domains yet. 2. Absolutely, it will have a Curie temperature that is likely not that high above absolute zero (maybe T = 5 - 20K) but we don't know this temperature at the moment.

Hi, just thank you for the video, I liked it, and subscribed. RE: 2, at such low temperatures, I'd think there wouldn't be that many electrons in an excited state, am I wrong about that? Is it the electrical current that causes the electrons to go into an excited state? @@ScienceDiscussed​

Yes at low temperatures the electrons settle down into the ground state. The electrical current is required to introduce more electrons into the system to make the effect possible. @@raygiordano1045

Glad you enjoyed it!

@irasmith3832, Just curious. How can this be "informative" if you" couldn't understand it"?

@@ccahill2322 He got to know about existence of that topic without understanding the underlying mechanics.

@@ccahill2322 I'll have to rewatch it again to get the details, but the base of information, that is there is a new magnet type is, informative. See?

@@randallwhiteis, See what? Are you "ira smith"? Why are you trying to answer for another's question?

Because of cina with an h to the right of the c

It is a ferromagnet.

Your perspective on magnetism and gravity is quite intriguing and delves into some deep concepts in physics. Let's break down a few of these ideas: Lowest Energy State: In physics, systems indeed tend to move towards a state of lowest energy. This is a fundamental principle that applies to various phenomena, including magnetism and gravitation. Magnetism and Material Properties: Different materials respond to magnetic fields in different ways based on their atomic and molecular structures. This response can be related to the alignment of magnetic domains in ferromagnetic materials, for example. Gravity and Magnetism: Your contention that magnetism is a result of aligned gravity is a novel idea. Conventional physics views magnetism and gravity as distinct forces. Gravity, as described by Einstein's theory of general relativity, is the curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy. Magnetism, on the other hand, is explained by electromagnetic theory and is related to the movement of charges. Charge and Angular Momentum: You suggest that charge is a result of clockwise versus anticlockwise angular momentum. In standard physics, electric charge is a fundamental property of particles like electrons and protons, and it's separate from angular momentum. Angular momentum is a measure of the amount of rotation an object has, taking into account its mass, shape, and speed of rotation. Magnetic Monopoles and Angular Momentum: The search for magnetic monopoles-particles with only one magnetic pole (north or south)-has been a topic of interest in physics, but none have been observed to date. The relationship you draw between angular momentum and the impossibility of magnetic monopoles is an original concept and deviates from mainstream physics. Unified Theory: The quest for a unified theory that explains all fundamental forces, including gravity, is ongoing in theoretical physics. Your idea of gravity being the only fundamental force and others being manifestations of it is a bold hypothesis, and it would require extensive theoretical and experimental support to challenge the existing frameworks of quantum mechanics and general relativity. Frame Dragging and Atomic Interactions: Frame dragging, a prediction of general relativity where massive rotating objects 'drag' the spacetime around them, is a fascinating concept, but its effects are typically observed on astronomical scales. Its role within atomic-scale interactions isn't recognized in current physics models. Your ideas touch upon some fundamental questions in physics. However, they represent a significant departure from established theories. To gain acceptance in the scientific community, such hypotheses would need to be backed by rigorous mathematical formulation and experimental evidence. The pursuit of such novel ideas is essential for the advancement of science, though it's important to critically evaluate them against the body of existing scientific knowledge.

Hi @MeLaang , that is a very excellent, concise, and precise analysis. Thank you. Yes, the ideas do seem to be very novel from what I've seen myself. I read recently on the internet that they had considered electromagnetism as possibly being the basis of a theory of everything but had discounted it. I don't have any reference to that at hand sadly. But, nobody seems to have considered gravity. They seem to have discounted it because it is appears to us as the weakest force, or differentiated as the (novel idea back then) curvature of spacetime. Instead we have worked out the characteristics of the system and given each characteristic a particle of its own serving one and one purpose only. Like a car where the steering wheel turns the vehicle direction and the engine turns the wheels. So there you would have the steering wheel particle and the engine particle and the four wheel particles... The idea of these one particle per today's characteristics would certainly have been a novel idea back in Greek times, and they came up with the novel idea of atoms. A female scientist came up with the novel idea that the sun was primarily composed of Hydrogen. So there certainly have been novel ideas, and then just plane crazy ideas, like String Theory for example, and perhaps even mine? But, the emphasise in science today seems to be to distinguish things rather than look at how things are similar. Similarities must be explained away so that everything can be distinct. Doesn't really sound like a path to 'everything' to me. Right down to things like conduction, convection, and radiation, which I believe can all ultimately be brought back under one simple umbrella of photons within particular systems. But science likes to keep these things distinct. Science instead has particles like photons popping in an out of existence. So everything has to be couched in those terms. It's a random soup that can at any moment turn into something else where particles exist presumably by interaction, to just by sheer quantum randomness where we get the sudden appearance of mirror twin particles from a particle field that somehow co-exists with all other particle fields, all the way up to entire big bang universes being generated from nothing. All of this is based upon some direct and some indirect evidence. But it is all a characterisation. We can characterise things in different ways and that is exactly what we do. And, the aim of science today seems to embolden descriptions within those characterisations so that there is no contradictory text and all similarities that question that distinction are explained away. So in some respects it doesn't feel like we are really looking because we won't look beyond our present characterisations for any reason. So, certainly the idea of gravitation as a basis would need modelling and discovery to have any significance. But who's going to bother when it is outside the current firmly established characterisation of things. The gravity that we feel, is continuous, but it is weak, so that is all there is to it I'm guessing for many minds. I assume that they would contend that it can't be the basis of stronger forces when it is so weak compared to those. That is just the lore that would be difficult to surmount. No matter the physical suggestions for the process, why bother looking? But, who knows. Maybe it will spark some ideas one day... I certainly think that some of the ignorances I've pointed out of science are valid, as you have concurred, such as ignoring gravitational drag at the atomic level. I think that it would be useful to recognise that a particle can have multiple intrinsic properties rather than creating new distinct particles for everything that happens.

gravity is the resistance to move akin to static and magnetic. Magnetic is high potential to transition stuck on a frame. Energy is just potential based on situations. Everything runs on a framework in a Markov like system. It's the speed of change not the speed of light in all equations. Idk just some things I think sometimes.

@@MeLaangso you just posted this into chat gpt?

I am intrigued in all your thinking and analysing that you have done. I don't understand much of what you are saying but as I am myself a little like you thinking and analysing things I would like to ask you a question about some of what you say. It is in regards to Charge - electrical charge I presume. In my understanding the charge differential comes from imbalance in electrons meaning more or less electrons being present. Although I make myself an overview of everything I am trying to get specific knowledge of just some simple things like what is an electron. In my opinion it is an amount of energy that is most likely not a particle at all but more like a standing wave. We know it has energy. We know it can have more or less energy depending upon if it is free or where it is located in an atom. We also know that every time it moves inwards in an atom it gives out an energy burst that we call a photon. Now it has been found that photons can have different amounts of energy although it all comes down to Planks constant multiplied by the frequency (E = hf). meaning that the only difference between the different photons is the different frequencies. I believe that it has been commonly accepted that this formula E = hf is valid for all frequencies from zero Hz to infinity Hz meaning that the photon is really Electro Magnetic Emission (EME). Looking at the units I find that it is really the energy in one second. Now to get to understand it all better I have been thinking a lot about what I know about EME from my experience with electricity, electronics, radio and radar and from that trying to find out more about what I believe to be the fundamental of everything namely energy. I would there fore like to know what your thoughts are about EME or the photon or what you will name it. I am thinking about how it exists and how it moves in it's most fundamental way.

Now check out the plasma fountain and then the toroidial plasma. Are we having fun yet?

This already exists naturally. I was at MIT when it was discovered. Im not tellin cause I am trying to buy it and dont need others buying it up 😝

You're very welcome!

Glad you liked it.

Yes the magnetisation direction is out-of-plane.

@@ScienceDiscussed...and are the moire pattern 'phase domains' (i guess) unipolar on each side of the plane, i.e A side is all N, B side all S, or do we have flux paths leaving and return on the same side with alternating NS domains? It's fascinating to think about the amplification and motivation applications and geometries of such a material, Magnetic Moire Bucky Balls?, phase shifting nanotubes?

@@IragmanIjo

Thank you! We have way too many speculations and hypothesis being pushed as fact in science (and elsewhere) these days. Determining something as fact because they can't find any evidence against their hypothesis.

Glad you liked it

Yes it is very similar

Thanks for the feedback.

There are plenty of metals that are magnetic that contain no Fe. For example, Cr is also often a source of magnetism.

@@ScienceDiscussed i know little of any other such magnet type metals, for curiosity i asked, thanks

Some good questions that I don't know the answers. I think more research is required.

It really is!

The fact that he is using that ridiculous Bohr diagram for the atom says a lot...

Wrong

@@casper191985 Not too forthcoming with information there Casper. Care to enlighten us other YT folk so we understand your view?

Because its nonsense.

Its just alchemy. You can already put metal in your clothing or magnets but stacking wool in a criss cross pattern will not make magnets and will not turn lead into gold

You're kidding, right?

@@samuelluria4744 What metal is it and when?

@@charlesspringer4709 - With all due respect, as you appear to be my elder, and I'm old enough for that to still have weight to it...I think the most efficient query would be, what we mean when we say "ancient"? To my admittedly limited knowledge, a substantial portion of the Iron Age predates the earliest reminiscences of Greece. Certainly, there are records of ferrous metal being used as studs in footwear at least 500 years B.C. (excuse the _passée_ annotation). In my book, that's enough to be considered ancient. I am more than happy to hear your thoughts.

@@samuelluria4744 Reasonable. I was thinking the bronze age ended much more recently. I don't know why that had stuck in my head. One of those persistent misremembered "facts". Thanks for the reminder.

@@charlesspringer4709 - 🫡 Anytime, Sir.

This material is quite special, but we don't know how special it is yet. Maybe we will find a few systems that have this still. Also everything is diamagnetic at least, which is why we can levitate frogs.