That's great to hear, thanks. This hobby site started with me finding a place to store lectures for my residents, but happy to know it's also helping residents elsewhere. Best luck on core exam, and you're almost there! Let me know if you guys have any neuro Q's.

wait, your technologist that do your exam knows more physics than you?

@@neuroradish Your Videos helped me so much!!!!!!!!!! Thank you so much

Ha ha, I wish I'm smart enough to be a physicist; just try to learn it to better my clinical understanding. I'm allergic to complex equations. :) I'm glad it helps. Thanks.

20 years ,love it ?

I TOTALLY AGREE!! I've seen several videos trying to explain this and by far, this is the BEST explanation!!! There is light at the end of the tunnel for me!!

It is the best out there , have looked a lot nothing informative like this one

Excellent, thanks

Hi. To be perfectly honest, I'm a clinical radiologist not a physicist, and admittedly have a limited knowledge in quantum physics. I would only see those drawings as for illustration purposes. Sort of a lay person's approach to a much more complex topic.

@@neuroradish I'm currently in cleerkship and struggling with MRI, thank you for your video. Does your video cover the MRI knowledge enough for clerkship and non-radiologist residency? I thought memorizing different disease with different pulse sequence finding is hard, without understanding the physics of MRI; However it is very difficult...

@@user-wr9ks3tf4n If you understand these basic MRI physics principles, it is more than enough for radiology clerkship. In fact, this is mostly for radiology residents and what they need to know for their board exam. Unfortunately, I don't think there is an easy way to study or memorize what a particular pathology looks like on what sequences. There are just too many pathologies. For vast majority of radiologists and experience clinicians, it is down to the "muscle memory". You need to look at the images over and over again. My advice is to look at as many images/sequences as you can for a particular disease, rather than just trying to memorize a list or read from a textbook that only shows a few selective images. You need to look at the entire study, repeatedly. Also, rather than trying to study too many diseases at once, pick one or few pathologies that you are not familiar with yet (maybe something you come across during your clerkship, or you heard about in an interesting presentation), then look up as many examples as you can, study it a little in depth, and look at the entire study (all sequences) for that one disease. We learn radiology by seeing the entire study, not just reading few pictures with arrows that points to the findings. I find that when I try to learn too many pathologies at once just by reading a textbook, different pathologies start to bland in with each. Don't get discourage! You'll get there.

@@neuroradish thank you for your detailed response doctor! I will get your advice and trying to look as much image as possible in one disease.

Thanks. I'm glad it's helpful. I assume a proton precessing at larmor frequency would produce EM waves but negligible for clinical MRI.

@@neuroradish thanks a lot.

@@neuroradish Thank you for your answer that got me excited. Can you unpack your thoughts on this matter? This could be the beginning of a research for me.

@@ahmetozdemir7173 I'm afraid it's beyond the scope of my understanding. At the end of the day, I'm just trying to simplify a complex subject such as MRI physics for my day-to-day clinical practice.

Indeed. R.I.P. Deforest...

Dear o dear, that sounds bad. Did they investigate the contrast?

@@jacobvandijk6525 well they stated you pee the contrast in 48 h . I did Urine test to measure gadolinium. Pending results . They also stated that PNS only occurred while you’re in the scanner . They cleaned their hands .