Introduction to Deleuze: Difference and Repetition

  Рет қаралды 305,221

Then & Now

Then & Now

5 жыл бұрын

I introduce the thought of Gilles Deleuze through his 1968 book, Difference and Repetition. I look at Deleuze's basic concepts - especially difference, repetition and the virtual; his relationship to philosophers like Spinoza and Kant; and how he provides some of the ontological foundations for other 'poststructural' or postmodern theorists like Foucault and Derrida.
I also look at the relationship between the virtual, the Idea and the multiplicity - all important concepts for understanding the rest of Deleuze's work. This introduction should serve to give a fuller understanding of ideas like the Rhizome, the haecceity and 'lines of flight' that are a large part of his later work with Félix Guattari - a Thousand Plateaus. Most importantly, I try to make understanding Deleuze as simple as possible!
Then & Now is FAN-FUNDED! Support me on Patreon and pledge as little as $1 per video: patreon.com/user?u=3517018
Or send me a one-off tip of any amount and help me make more videos:
www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr...
Buy on Amazon through this link to support the channel:
amzn.to/2ykJe6L
Follow me on:
Facebook: thethenandnow
Instagram: / thethenandnow
Twitter: / lewlewwaller
Credits:
Stock footage provided by Videvo, downloaded from www.videvo.net
Foucault Image:
By Nemomain
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
(commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...)
Edited by Lewis Waller
Image of Derrida:
By Chinmoy Guha
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
(commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...)
Edited by Lewis Waller
Image of Deleuze:
By trenutna
sr.wikipedia.org/sr-el/%D0%94...
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
(commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...)
Edited by Lewis Waller
Music:
Cylinder Five by Chris Zabriskie is licensed under a Creative Commons License: creativecommons.org/licenses/b...

Пікірлер: 450
@ThenNow
@ThenNow Жыл бұрын
Script & sources at: www.thenandnow.co/2023/04/25/introduction-to-deleuze-difference-and-repetition/ ► Sign up for the newsletter to get concise digestible summaries: www.thenandnow.co/the-newsletter/ ► Why Support Then & Now? www.patreon.com/user/about?u=3517018
@bombers7878
@bombers7878 5 жыл бұрын
This is an amazing service you’re providing and a much needed alternative to the School of Lite.
@ThenNow
@ThenNow 5 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Glad you're enjoying
@WillemV203
@WillemV203 3 жыл бұрын
Basically every School of Life video: '[something something] ART'
@danwroy
@danwroy 3 жыл бұрын
We *need* some basic philosopher courses in a Brit-ish accent
@juliussw9153
@juliussw9153 3 жыл бұрын
cuck philosophy also makes great and well-researched videos on mostly postmodernist and marxist philosophy
@stevenf5902
@stevenf5902 3 жыл бұрын
School of life isn’t terrible but it is kinda ass
@simonti1234
@simonti1234 5 жыл бұрын
EXPLAIN DELEUZE TO ME RIG- Oh nice. Thanks
@edoardoCanny
@edoardoCanny 5 жыл бұрын
Ahahahahahahhaahahahahhahahahaha
@andrewenrique5503
@andrewenrique5503 5 жыл бұрын
lol
@3spooky5me4school
@3spooky5me4school 5 жыл бұрын
good meme
@ThenNow
@ThenNow 5 жыл бұрын
Finally just saw the meme that has enabled me to get this
@WhiteDeVil3
@WhiteDeVil3 4 жыл бұрын
A life has been spared, that day.
@AvantiMoltoVeloce
@AvantiMoltoVeloce 3 жыл бұрын
As a PhD student who studies Critical Posthumanism based on Deleuzian ontology I can only say: thank you
@factoryman28
@factoryman28 2 жыл бұрын
nerd
@AvantiMoltoVeloce
@AvantiMoltoVeloce 2 жыл бұрын
@Cpt.Frost you share epistemological similarities with colonialists and ridiculous people that thinks that socialism is about rationality and to blindly obey the government whatsoever, and other shit like that, I don't
@AvantiMoltoVeloce
@AvantiMoltoVeloce 2 жыл бұрын
@Cpt.Frost fucking Latin American left, you've been there for a century now and the only thing you managed to achieve is Bolsonaro.. study fucking hell.. study
@AvantiMoltoVeloce
@AvantiMoltoVeloce 2 жыл бұрын
@Cpt.Frost you really don't know anything about postcolonialism criticism of capitalism, do you? Ok, I've got cacao in my head, still better than believing that feminism has been controlled by the CIA or thinking that real socialism and nationalism go hand by hand, as I can see from your videos that praise murderers on your channel.. Jesus I would hate being you. Have fun
@mikiafu
@mikiafu Жыл бұрын
oh jeez what pile of garbage
@prodhab_
@prodhab_ 5 жыл бұрын
Make more videos about Deleuze please!
@ThenNow
@ThenNow 5 жыл бұрын
Coming up soon!
@benjaminmcgrand5961
@benjaminmcgrand5961 4 жыл бұрын
Please do!
@kawenka8258
@kawenka8258 3 жыл бұрын
@@ThenNow :(
@dionysusyphus
@dionysusyphus 3 жыл бұрын
Seriously changed my life with this video, if you didn't introduce me to Deleuze I'd still be deeply frustrated in search for the language to translate and sher these deeply complex and confusing visions and ideas that I've had but never been able to pin down in language for myself or others, and if I didn't stumble across this last year my direction would be undoubtedly in a different direction in my philosophical journey. Thank You so much!
@nickark4807
@nickark4807 25 күн бұрын
Hell yeah! What do you think of Deleuze now, 3 years later? Are there any other thinkers he led you to?
@AlienFetus
@AlienFetus 5 жыл бұрын
It was time for this! Deleuze is too relevant not to have good video essays on his philosophy. Just some remarks. Deleuze began conceptualizing an ontology of difference rather than identity, but some may argue that he, after Guattari, somewhat changed that to accommodate the multiple, with a new more pluralist ontology of multiplicity. The same goes to understanding Deleuze as a monist, as some people may argue he got further and further from defending unifying conceptual structures beyond the aesthetic, or that his paradox Pluralism = Monism gave a new layer to his position, that couldn't be stated as a monism as it is commonly understood. And you should have probably used his term "concept" instead of "idea", since they are not equal in his metaphysics. Glad to finally see a good intro essay on Deleuze here on KZfaq. Keep it up, do A Thousand Plateaus next!
@liledman76
@liledman76 5 жыл бұрын
He's right to use idea, since Deleuze bashes "the concept" in this work, before eventually coming back to it in WiP. On the monist point and the change in his thinking, or at least terminology, one of the stranger things is that he gives such pride of place to the concept of univocity in this work, but it entirely vanishes afterwards. I've always puzzled at the changes between his works, ATP unleashes a whole new conceptual apparatus, even if it is motivated by basically the same problems.
@spiritualanarchist8162
@spiritualanarchist8162 5 жыл бұрын
@@liledman76 I find that ( paradoxically ?) semantics often gets in the way when one tries to describe ATP's work. It could be argued ( in response on your comment ) that Deleuze idea's on 'The concept' becomes a concept in itself the moment one wants to describe it.
@TheMagicfan77
@TheMagicfan77 4 жыл бұрын
This is what a lot of Bundle Theorists have to say on Spinoza's "substance" the act of trying to conceiving of an eternal or an infinite gives it a conceptual boundary that is inherently limiting
@adaptercrash
@adaptercrash Жыл бұрын
Yes in a function of determinations of your biology contrasted by the multipicities and assemblages who defy the process of his ontology of biological determinations of l in difference. We can do that for you but that's not what I wanted. Metaphysics is old epistimic systems of causality that fall short of proper causality of ontological processes in difference, these systems of metaphysical ontology were deconstructed by Heidegger. I wouldn't say conceptualizing but actual doing by being-in-the-world while at odds with methods of epistimic, metaphysic systems to fully authenticate your biology, as defined in difference within a process of being-towards-death in ontic formations of the ontological of Dasein. In a way it is similar, at least the one I read, various conceptual frameworks, like heideggerian ontology but easier to understand; however he doesn't relate them in forms of reductive processing in various ontology forms (he shouldn't have to,) but defines the concepts rather than demonstrating the emergence of biological determinations within the difference of repetition ontology. The problem of ontology of multiplication is the inversion of difference in the assemblage and possible worlds of the I in its formation after rejected through difference. And difference can be simply refined by a discharge from repetition of a schedule, not eating 3 times a day, or other programs of being have a schedule within' temporal processes that's in repetition within' systems of ontology that are naturally rejected in difference then synthesized into biological determinations of repetition at odds with difference. Truth is irrelevant and knowledge of things is processed after in difference.
@cigolsimons1768
@cigolsimons1768 5 жыл бұрын
It took me so many re-watches to finally understand the whole video.
@timhorton2486
@timhorton2486 4 жыл бұрын
Cigol Simons that’s been my entire experience with poststructuralist philosophy
@hyacinth1320
@hyacinth1320 4 жыл бұрын
I think it's such a different way of looking at things so it's to be expected. :)
@damianbylightning6823
@damianbylightning6823 4 жыл бұрын
​@@timhorton2486 Man, if you, like, don't understand it, like, that's so oppressive of the other - so reductive, totalising and fascist! My favourite piece of philosophy was written by Desmond, a crack and cider addict who lives in the local bus station. I gave him a keyboard and asked him to authentically write his explanation of ontological reality. He tried to eat the keyboard - but I just know what he was saying. I've had that keyboard now for 5 years and I still can't quite grasp Desmond's explanations. I may do a video on it on my channel - it's called Wake Up You Stupid Cunt! This Shit has NO Fuckin' Meaning - and that's it's Point! Total pleb!
@timhorton2486
@timhorton2486 4 жыл бұрын
mudpuddlestruck bylightning I’m glad we’ve got geniuses like you out there deciding what does and doesn’t have meaning.
@damianbylightning6823
@damianbylightning6823 4 жыл бұрын
@@timhorton2486 You're welcome, my son. I can make it even simpler - just read 1st rate thinkers and avoid the 3rd and 4th rate and below. There are many 2nd rate tinkers of note that you should think about - and some of them are involved in the perverse dance of bullshittery, that pampered and pretentious people find so fascinating. Just take a tip from science - it's about practical use. If you stuck to real knowledge, you'd know that.
@damnboy1235
@damnboy1235 5 жыл бұрын
This channel never fails to deliver.
@richardgraham6511
@richardgraham6511 2 жыл бұрын
I read Philosophy at a decent University 20 years ago, your content matches the levels of engagement and rigour offered by them. You deserve more credit for your output which is highly engaging and pitches at the right type level to be of interest to a wide audience. What a fabulous resource.
@bayanhaddad2665
@bayanhaddad2665 Ай бұрын
Totally agree. Hats off and so much respect
@eleftheriosepikuridis9110
@eleftheriosepikuridis9110 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for making this. You're giving sooo valuable insight into thought that is hard to access and understand yet has such radical potential to reshape how we conceptualize everything!
@LogicGated
@LogicGated Жыл бұрын
Still one of the best video essays on Deleuze on KZfaq.
@davebryant5731
@davebryant5731 4 жыл бұрын
Hi I’m doing my PhD on education ; my area of research is post structuralism.i started reading difference and repetition. I decided to get an understanding so found your channel which I found very useful . Thanks immensely !
@tiely13
@tiely13 5 жыл бұрын
Jeeej, Love the vid. Clearly explained to understand Deleuze and one of his key concept. Can't wait for the nexts!
@blossomandwren6222
@blossomandwren6222 3 жыл бұрын
Wow, this has to be the best ever explanation of Deleuze, I am just reading difference and repetition and was looking for a way to understand the basics in plain English first thanks so much really enjoy your programmes.
@alandiaz8755
@alandiaz8755 5 жыл бұрын
I just recently discovered this channel and it has quickly become my favourite phil channel by far. great work!
@ThenNow
@ThenNow 5 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Glad you're enjoying :)
@markyoung01maccom
@markyoung01maccom Жыл бұрын
What makes this video and in fact the whole channel is the quality of production and the depth of insight with regards the materials. There are a lot of philosophy channels on KZfaq, they tend to run the gambit between evangelising the host (philosophy tube) or so dumbing down,overly simplifying or worse losing the point of the material(the school of life). This is a wonderful channel that provides real utility!
@evrenkayas6838
@evrenkayas6838 5 жыл бұрын
As a sociology student from Turkey, I would like to thank you for this great video :) And now I am waiting for the concept of desire and its relation to object in Deleuze.
@CG0077
@CG0077 5 жыл бұрын
Brilliant! I was looking a few weeks ago for a run down of Deleuze and couldnt find anything. This is perfect, thanks for the excellent video.
@thealmanac_4935
@thealmanac_4935 5 жыл бұрын
Best channel on KZfaq 👌👌👌
@ThenNow
@ThenNow 5 жыл бұрын
Ah thank you!
@magdach5385
@magdach5385 4 жыл бұрын
THANKS. I´m so indentified with both Spinoza and Kant, and now i fiind Deleuze. I´m sure that i will enjoy read his ideas.
@shanajames7552
@shanajames7552 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for creating this video. I am a visual artist writing my Masters by Research exegesis, and this overview has really helped me. I would love another on the rhizome as this idea has revolutionised the way I think about the creative process and myself in the world.
@lordtugboat
@lordtugboat 5 жыл бұрын
This might be my new favorite video of yours. Looking forward to more content on Deleuze. ❤️
@ThenNow
@ThenNow 5 жыл бұрын
Great to hear, thanks!
@theisegeberg
@theisegeberg 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you! I'm reading ATP, and this is exactly the kind of stuff I need to move through it. :) You've helped me a lot.
@tomatomanXD
@tomatomanXD 5 жыл бұрын
thank u eagerly waiting for a vid on anti Oedipus
@gracieronniexx
@gracieronniexx 5 жыл бұрын
SAME
@ambervase4245
@ambervase4245 5 жыл бұрын
YES PLZ
@inanedreamz673
@inanedreamz673 5 жыл бұрын
Same
@keithwi3409
@keithwi3409 5 жыл бұрын
But why
@DuckDeleuze666
@DuckDeleuze666 4 жыл бұрын
OMG YES PLEASE
@josefasalmon5191
@josefasalmon5191 3 жыл бұрын
beautiful video!!! making concepts visible such as the "virtual". Amazing, please keep making these videos, You're putting Deleuze on film, making the image speak.
@pablorodriguez1971
@pablorodriguez1971 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for this vid! It brought to me a lot of new ideas extremely wonderful and simple explanation of Deleuze now I can reread and dive in :) Great work man
@HxH2011DRA
@HxH2011DRA 5 жыл бұрын
I'm honestly shocked I could understand even half of that, you're pretty good at explaining stuff XD
@AlienFetus
@AlienFetus 5 жыл бұрын
You are everywhere, I can't take this any longer. I will erase you from my feed, Meruem-sama
@HxH2011DRA
@HxH2011DRA 5 жыл бұрын
@@AlienFetus my names Mr.Idealist, and do what you must
@emptycloud2774
@emptycloud2774 5 жыл бұрын
I love your channel, and thanks for exploring one of my favourite thinkers. His metaphysics, conscious or not, influenced me through my social science degrees. I want to explore more, but I stopped because I need to explore Kant - and as you wrote, Spinoza. But, don't forget Nietzsche and Bergson. Also, Deleuze did critique structuralism, even writing a paper on how we recognise structures. His poststructuralism is definitely deeper than those concerned with language. Your section on the Virtual encapsulates this changing structure, the focus on flows, desire, lines of flight, assemblages, and most importantly, the Rhizome, his image of thought that is different to Aristotle's Tree/hierarchal thinking. The Rhizome has no hierarchy, beginning, end, direction, filled with connections that lead to the Actual (I think reflected in the growth of the rhizome, I.e. mushrooms ect.). What video did you release that led to demonitarisation?
@chaseaflu9722
@chaseaflu9722 5 жыл бұрын
Really poignant balance of content and presentation, between abundance and clarity.
@GlobeHackers
@GlobeHackers 2 жыл бұрын
A well-composed, brief, and lucid explanation of a profound thinker. I'm happy you are here.
@mariamoraes2903
@mariamoraes2903 2 жыл бұрын
Muito obrigada❤️👏🎶
@susanwright6873
@susanwright6873 4 жыл бұрын
A brilliant perspective and explanation of Deleuze's work ! Thank you.
@3spooky5me4school
@3spooky5me4school 5 жыл бұрын
these videos are honestly fantastic, keep it up dude
@ThenNow
@ThenNow 5 жыл бұрын
Thank you, much appreciated!
@anweralqattan2037
@anweralqattan2037 5 жыл бұрын
I truly appreciate your effort, and I wish to find another video for you about this rhizomatous philosopher!
@WillemV203
@WillemV203 5 жыл бұрын
These videos are so fucking good. Unbelievable how much time, effort and love you put in these videos. Well done, loving it!
@Magritte000
@Magritte000 2 жыл бұрын
You're great at explaining these complex ideas. Thanks a lot!
@TheLale14
@TheLale14 3 жыл бұрын
I am very grateful for this video. I'm starting to read Deleuze and you helped a lot. Greetings from Brazil!
@andrewenrique5503
@andrewenrique5503 3 жыл бұрын
Oi amiguinha compatriota, esse canal tem muitos vídeos bons. Recomendo sobre Foucault também!!
@rationalityrules111
@rationalityrules111 3 жыл бұрын
Nice. I really enjoyed the slow paced clearly spoken and well-structured content. A lot of hard work has gone into the making of this video. Thanks man.
@Justanothaguy
@Justanothaguy 5 жыл бұрын
Interesting, I never thought of Deleuze’s points like that.
@danilthorstensson8902
@danilthorstensson8902 3 жыл бұрын
With these types of videos, my brain cells really appreciate the British accent
@msjarrowsmith5869
@msjarrowsmith5869 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge in such an accessible way. You are really helping me progress in my degree in Psychology!
@ThenNow
@ThenNow 3 жыл бұрын
So glad I could help :)
@gustavosanthiago
@gustavosanthiago 5 жыл бұрын
Very interesting! Some concepts mentioned remind me of the buddhist's philosophy of impermanence and emptiness (absence of inherent existence). I recommend Nagarjuna's Mulamadhyamakakarika or Candrakirti's Madhyamakavatara if anyone is interested! :D
@eccotom1
@eccotom1 2 жыл бұрын
this comment made me move into a Zen monastery
@jongomm
@jongomm 2 жыл бұрын
@@eccotom1 It's your turn to put the bins out
@TedTrembinski
@TedTrembinski 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this! I stumbled into Deluze and with your help feel like a few things are clicking for me at once!
@wcropp1
@wcropp1 5 жыл бұрын
This was a great video. Looking forward to the rest of the series. There are some interesting parallels between Deleuze and Whitehead that may be interesting to explore at some point. Thanks!
@ElefantPenisJr
@ElefantPenisJr 5 жыл бұрын
Wow you explain this 100x clearer than truediltom. You're my go to philosophy tuber now, thank you.
@dionysusyphus
@dionysusyphus 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the depth and respect for the Seperatio step of the alchemical process
@k-Gonzo
@k-Gonzo 3 жыл бұрын
This greatly helps my understanding of the philosophy of the CCRU.
@h.a.s.42
@h.a.s.42 4 жыл бұрын
G.D. would have remained inaccessible to me without your explanation. Thank you
@idilkumsaldolanbay4224
@idilkumsaldolanbay4224 3 жыл бұрын
It was a great explanation about a very complicated and "hard to understand" philosopher... Thanks!
@nicholasb4071
@nicholasb4071 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for making something impossibly deep relatively simple to understand.
@ThenNow
@ThenNow 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Nicholas!
@ofe4280
@ofe4280 2 жыл бұрын
Love the pace of this
@ianwallace4127
@ianwallace4127 5 жыл бұрын
Wow, thanks! Clearly, thoughtfully composed.
@peacesellsstevebuyin
@peacesellsstevebuyin 3 жыл бұрын
What a fantastic video! Really helped explained Deleuze
@espatricia
@espatricia 5 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for this enormous explanation of Deleuze!!!
@TheOriginalGankstar
@TheOriginalGankstar 5 жыл бұрын
I think history might look back on Deleuze in 100 years time as the most important philosopher of the 2nd half of the 20th century in opening the gate to new ideas... something I'm trying to write about myself. Glad to have stumbled upon this thinker. He probably already said a lot of what I wish to say.
@treuhandesign
@treuhandesign 5 жыл бұрын
fantastic video..interesting how you speak so clearly and understand these texts
@nabanitaroy3000
@nabanitaroy3000 4 жыл бұрын
I am beginning to understand Deleuze, thank you so much.
@timothydidnttreadwell5012
@timothydidnttreadwell5012 5 жыл бұрын
these vids are great as a way to make sure I understand wtf it is I'm reading-- thanks
@Byenia
@Byenia 4 жыл бұрын
It's very strange to me how KZfaq is demonetizing so many channels all across the spectrum. People like to assume it's only those of particular genres/content, but that's incorrect. It seems to be impacting nearly everybody on this site (aside from, perhaps, the major corporate channels, especially big media companies). Useful as this site has been, it's not a bad idea to start uploading copies to other video platforms as a back-up or laying the groundwork for a future financial alternative. Just sad to see so many useful channels demonetized for seemingly no good reason.
@FrankNFurter1000
@FrankNFurter1000 5 жыл бұрын
Discovered your channel today - fantastic stuff! Please more Deleuze.
@rusirumunasinghe7354
@rusirumunasinghe7354 3 жыл бұрын
Commenting so I will get more recommendations of this! Amazing content!
@hamsterslice
@hamsterslice 4 жыл бұрын
Really recommend Manuel De Landa's books for an accessible approach to Deleuze that isn't just a "for dummies"
@musaabmomani4022
@musaabmomani4022 5 жыл бұрын
Please keep going with Deleuze 🙏 he's an intellectual struggle. But really what i like about it till this moment is, when you raise a repeating, a difference (as an idea, or a concept) you raise certain value of human's intellectuality, it pushes your mind confidence forward. It praises your ideas. They are maybe not wrong but different, the philosophy of Deleuze recreates human after "human was dead".
@notmyrealpseudonym6702
@notmyrealpseudonym6702 4 жыл бұрын
But as soon as the human is dead, long live the human. As soon as the human is alive, long dead the human..
@teugene5850
@teugene5850 2 жыл бұрын
this was a pretty faithful and clear overview of the basic "logic" of Delueze... thank you.
@LesterBrunt
@LesterBrunt Жыл бұрын
I just started reading Delouze and what I got out of it so far is that there is chaos that is a sort of field that is in constant flux, not static, like white noise is all audible frequencies at once and they are all constantly interacting with each other. A sine wave is a repetition, in white noise there is also that sine wave but to isolate it you need to repeat it over time, it needs to stand out. I can see an object because the light repeatedly bounces of the object instead of moving freely in chaos. When those repeated objects interact with other parts of itself or other objects then you have rhythm, like a flower opening under the sunlight or dozens of muscles, ligaments, nerves and joints working in sync to grab a can of soda. That is what I got out of it so far but I might be off.
@joysr1387
@joysr1387 5 жыл бұрын
Spinoza, Kant...what about Bergson? You might have mentioned this major influence for Deleuze
@AvantiMoltoVeloce
@AvantiMoltoVeloce 3 жыл бұрын
Marx maybe?
@sophiasunshine2425
@sophiasunshine2425 4 жыл бұрын
Excellent job on explaining philosophers and their works, you should be a teacher in your career.
@leonardstoehr1066
@leonardstoehr1066 5 жыл бұрын
I would especially appreciate a window into Anti-Oedipus and its connection to May of '68. Thanks!
@ramseypietronasser2
@ramseypietronasser2 3 жыл бұрын
This is brilliant. Thanks for making
@taolex77814
@taolex77814 4 жыл бұрын
Then and Now, have you ever read Zen philosophy? It's fascinating to me how Deleuze had some crossover with the emphasis that some Zen thinkers place on how thought is an inadequate representation of the ultimate reality we live in. Just something you may want to give a try!
@Jesse-fk3xc
@Jesse-fk3xc 9 ай бұрын
It’s also an old Christian idea that god can’t be approached with knowing but unknowing
@normameacock3348
@normameacock3348 2 жыл бұрын
Brilliant. Life changing. Thank you so much.
@Hugihugo
@Hugihugo 5 жыл бұрын
As good an explanation as I've received it on Deleuze. Thank you! Can anyone tell me about some concrete examples of how Deleuze's thoughts were practically implemented into anything, such as personal lives, politics, natural sciences, etc.?
@JulianWegner
@JulianWegner 5 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Finally a video I can show my friends. One about the body without organs would be awesome :)
@juliozz59
@juliozz59 2 жыл бұрын
I think I got majority of it... brain feels exhausted, overloaded thanks a lot for the explanation
@bugzyseagull2505
@bugzyseagull2505 5 жыл бұрын
On Substance vs. Process metaphysics as the temporal aspect of identity and difference, because quite a bit of people first think "temporal" when it comes to difference, equations in physics formalize the process as a non-changing, formal object, abstracting a being out of becoming, still an equation while blurring the line between process and substance, essence and existence, remains a differential structure and the difference defines its identity.
@mohammadaskar3760
@mohammadaskar3760 4 жыл бұрын
This is a very nice video ,thanks for sharing your knowledge .
@ThenNow
@ThenNow 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching :)
@anam8787
@anam8787 4 жыл бұрын
You explained so well, thank you very much!
@ThenNow
@ThenNow 4 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@davidmb1595
@davidmb1595 5 жыл бұрын
Please make more videos about this type of more contemporary thinkers, such as Guattari, Agamben, Kristeva, Parisi, please, they're so difficult yet so fascinating… and your videos do help a lot on understanding them better
@jasonparker6138
@jasonparker6138 4 жыл бұрын
This is very good
@futuristica1710
@futuristica1710 7 ай бұрын
Really good explanation!
@bkavoussi
@bkavoussi 4 жыл бұрын
Excellent introduction to Deleuze. It seems that what Deleuze means by "generalization" is "inductive inference" in the philosophical language.
@abcrane
@abcrane 2 жыл бұрын
finally...a commercial that matches the content of the video...Yo Yo Ma! "Perfectionism vs expression!" (repetition vs difference) How poetic!
@carolinanavarro5586
@carolinanavarro5586 5 жыл бұрын
Thanks! It 's helped me a lot!
@interpassivity
@interpassivity 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video, explained it so well
@jeffreejin3241
@jeffreejin3241 4 жыл бұрын
This video helps me a lot! Thanks!!
@Repetoire
@Repetoire 5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for making Deleuze not boring every other video was boring
@jaimelugo4428
@jaimelugo4428 5 жыл бұрын
Great job!
@TerryKrg
@TerryKrg 5 жыл бұрын
This was really helpful thanks!
@ramonrocha6253
@ramonrocha6253 5 жыл бұрын
Great video, it's hard to find good videos about deleuze on youtube
@brainxtc2171
@brainxtc2171 5 жыл бұрын
Great job. Thank you.
@janreal84
@janreal84 4 жыл бұрын
you are doing an amazing job!
@petrichor100
@petrichor100 4 жыл бұрын
immensely appreciated!
@billywhite1403
@billywhite1403 2 жыл бұрын
thank you! you deserve at least a comment for the algo.
@teosurch
@teosurch Жыл бұрын
Thanks for overview ❤
@juhoaatosaleksirautiainen3744
@juhoaatosaleksirautiainen3744 5 жыл бұрын
Great video!
@growingmelancholy8374
@growingmelancholy8374 3 жыл бұрын
I like what you did there with the "bodies of the dead."
@flipmcdonought5835
@flipmcdonought5835 3 жыл бұрын
Well done, thank you.
@pixelated_dinosaur
@pixelated_dinosaur 5 жыл бұрын
Finally, Deleuze in KZfaq!!
@nicolascostello7276
@nicolascostello7276 5 жыл бұрын
Bergson - nuff said :)
@lilmoesk899
@lilmoesk899 4 жыл бұрын
Well done, thanks!
Understanding Derrida, Deconstruction & Of Grammatology
17:16
Then & Now
Рет қаралды 530 М.
Explaining Deleuze with drum machines
13:43
Jonas Čeika - CCK Philosophy
Рет қаралды 313 М.
Deleuze - Control Societies & Cybernetic Posthumanism
18:18
PlasticPills
Рет қаралды 150 М.
Deleuze - Difference and Repetition (1)
1:31:24
Absurd Being
Рет қаралды 10 М.
American Psycho, Baudrillard and the Postmodern Condition
10:50
Jonas Čeika - CCK Philosophy
Рет қаралды 683 М.
Foucault/Deleuze: what happened?
27:28
Deleuze Philosophy
Рет қаралды 10 М.
The Philosophy of Stray: Deleuze's Difference and Repetition
21:23
Epoch Philosophy
Рет қаралды 20 М.
Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, "The Desiring Machines”
1:28:19
Critical Theory
Рет қаралды 47 М.
Gilles Deleuze's alphabet book:  D as Desire
27:45
SUB-TIL
Рет қаралды 168 М.
You’d Be Surprised How Closed-Minded You Are | Jacques Derrida
10:52
Pursuit of Wonder
Рет қаралды 801 М.
Gilles Deleuze's alphabet book:  A for Animal
22:36
SUB-TIL
Рет қаралды 253 М.