a8lg6p

What are you, some sort of Uncle Tom, or is it that some of you green pea buffoons have a barbarian caveman complex? Every concept & institution that the British supposedly "invented" was either reversed engineered from the Catholic Church university system (the same university system of today, which it did invent, and is also the reason why any European can write in his respective language in the first place) or the Renaissance which came out of the Church- preserved influence of Greco-Roman antiquity. Britain might have played a role in making freedom & the educated widespread, but it did not invent the concepts of human-international rights or the foundations of science or economy, it just re-branded them and made it relevant to it's own time period. Even America's Founding Fathers admit to the many influences that would shape the Constitution. It just wasn't accessible to a large part of the population before the Renaissance, because Europe was in an extreme state of barbarism and backwardness, thus precipitating the need for a martial law mentality before the early Modern Period. Even then, the American Republic is the true symbol of freedom and laissez-faire (not some Keynesian Anglo-American welfare-warfare police state that talks about prosperity, yet is in a trillion dollars of debt, doesn't even have it's own production-manufacturing sectors and is really a puppet entity controlled by a Zionist financial bureaucracy, which are the true illegal immigrants who produce nothing), if it wasn't, then there would've been no reason for America to free itself (which it was able to do, because the French & Spanish military defeated the British) from the Divine Right of Kings and highly centralized bureaucracy that plagued(s) Britain. Finally, the French, Spanish & Portuguese did not settle the Americas in mass hoards like the Germans & Scots-Irish (Anglo-Americans are actually a minority) and they eventually would garner more interest in selling off land if they could, rather than cultivating what was already a terrain not arable in the degree that North America is. The point is industriousness has a lot to with the land you occupy, not biology, only the feeble-minded ignoramus thinks that way.

Sorry, you lost me at Zionist conspiracy. I have a tendency to tune out anti-semites..

Exactly, nickle and dime, feeble-minded rhetoric that says you're either too stupid or cowardly to face facts, since I even have to explain that you obviously can't decipher (again) between biology and philosophy. Zionism is a lifestyle, not an ethnic group and is based out of the non-semitic Khazarian people usurping the name of good, common Jews, so how can it be anti-semitic? Even dignified (real Abrahamic-like paleo-Hebrews) Jews themselves are anti-Zionist and are vigilant about the evidence, because Zionism is straight out the Jewish history. Read Rockefeller books, research the evidence, stop being a Stockholm syndrome manipulated dumbass.

That should all be an established given by now. The issue at hand is how you support this so-called Semitic Zionist realm whose elitist leaders sponsor wholesale exterminations of non-Jewish types of Semitic civilians (many of whom are Christian) who also live in the region, in order to propagate what they call a Jewish state, with Ashkenazi elements even going as far as to look down on their Sephardic Jewish counterparts. It's ludicrous to whole segments of the voting class in America (including Jews) how their nation's military & financial resources are being used for this belligerence while they get their own tax money loaned back to them at interest & so-called tax cuts are re-directed torwards this genocide. I'm not concerned about the plurality of responsible, considerate Hebrew CIVILIAN people(s) and those that they've proselytized who draw inspiration from the ideal & reality of a reanimated kingdom or republic of Israel for the sincere purpose of their safety and defense. Maybe that's their personal method of displaying that this is their way of preserving Jacob's name or reuniting the ten tribes (nine, Simeon was actually located within Judah, like it was some independent state within another state of the Holy Roman Empire) with Judah & Benjamin (and the Levites, who are now extinct). Or that they want to make up for the mistakes of Jehu & Solomon. That's their business. What I know is that the bible is infallible and that all divine scripture is based on objectivity and evidence, not just the Torah or something like the Talmud (although the seven Noahide laws in the Talmud are a prime example of universal moral code pertaining to public relations & civic virtue for all people, regardless of language or religion. The bible itself mentions "a mass conversion of Jews" in the end of days. Even so, even in the Talmud, one of the Three Oaths states that the Jews are sworn not to go up from Exile to the Land of Israel en masse). I'm pinpointing a Sabbatean and/ or Zionist ECONOMIC minority elite that have proven to infiltrate every institution of global society, from entertainment (pornography is a Zionist industry) to science; state to church, but most importantly, economics. These people have ancient zealotry and tradition that now encompass/ distort their belief system. They are in the mold of: 1. Cain and Nimrod's empire 2. Babylon, or the Tower of Babel (possibly the attempt to escape another deluge through human means, or the attempt to invade & usurp Heaven.) 3. The Israelites that opposed Moses in the desert until their encampment was swallowed up by the earth. 4. The Israelites in the northern kingdom that continued to build their economy and government around the golden calf originally fabricated by Aaron until the captivity of 722 B.C. 5. Judas Iscariot, who betrayed Jesus in the name of financial interests 6. The Jews who went along with liberating Barrabas over Christ 7. The New Testament's warning of people who claim to be Jews, but are of "the Synagogue of Satan". 8. The Zionist elite who consciously believe that they need to promote evil in this world in order to bring about God's wrath faster, for their own benefit. 9. Those who wish to settle a score with Gentiles over being expelled from Israel, carrying out this vendetta through world financial monopolization. The "Amalekites" or "Goyim" as they have been quoted as calling the rest of the world. 9. The atheist materialist Communist Bolshevik movement that was responsible for the murder of whole communities of Christians. Prominent Jewish-American leader Rabbi Stephen Wise once infamously stated, "Some call it Marxism, I call it Judaism." 10. The Israeli military personnel who attacked the U.S.S. Liberty in June of 1967, with many sources of evidence demonstrating that the Israeli soldiers knew very well it was an American ship. 11. Khazarian "Jews" are not ethnically the paleo-Hebrews of the bible, therefore they themselves hold no ancestral claim to the land. 12. Some of these things are what Benjamin Franklin was roughly referring to in his archive about this topic, although I would look to Jefferson before him as an impartial, spiritual influence. Reasonably it's expected that all people are not going to agree on the bible right at this specific faze of history. I'm referencing it, because it's also a part of Jewish history. Again, the bible mentions that "there will be a mass conversion of the Jews" at the end of days, which seems to indicate that God will judge those who have lived by Providence & the rule of law that is "written in every man's soul" objectively & mercifully. What is important is that all archaological, scientific & historical evidence arguably favors creation & micro-evolution while darwinism continues to remain a theory, only supported by the power of state and it's bubble currency, which is the responsibility of individuals to learn for themselves in an information age if they really believe in the Renaissance or the Enlightenment. Ultimately the true Israel is the New Covenant between Christ (the tearing of the temple veil after the Crucifixion signifying the Old Covenant being fulfilled), who is the realization of the line of David through the resurrected God-Man, and the Church, the twelve disciples being the spiritual manifestation of the twelve tribes incorporating the Gentile world. How ironic that you would defend Zionism like family and portray yourself as if you have the mindset that all those who claim to be Jewish are somehow impervious to containing a by-product of agenda-driven elitist fanaticism whose proponents would be willing to sell anyone out. Much of the Old Testament is written to amplify the moral lessons of both the corruptions and the pinnacles of both Israel & Judah. Would they depend on materialism, or God? What about now? Will the vigilance of the Old Testament be used for bad or for good, and will it be used instead to extract the influence of Dathan & Abiram, Aaron's golden calf, Baal, Babylon, Sodom & Gomorrah or Solomon's wives, like some sort of Jezebel renaissance? It's part of their history as well. Yet you're willing to recognize the corruption in the EU seamlessly when the citizens within the EU have nothing to do with what it's statist bureaucracy is doing anymore than the citizens of Britain are. There's a reason why sound money philosophies that changed the scope of perception while still being able to maintain a perspective of economics as a whole have names like "Austrian economics" & "laissez-faire".

TL:DR

Amen to that! If he makes it, I might just move there. Too bad he can't be America's next President!

David Hall Can you imagine him as PM and someone like Walker or Rand Paul as President? We'd have another Thatcher/Reagan relationship and a new dawn of relations.

He wouldn't get the votes.

@@jonlanier_ 4 years on, Its Trump and Boris Johnson. Bet you never saw that one coming. Seems like there will be a good relationship with those two.

Hum really how about the genocides in Africa India Australia New Zealand America all by the English speaking world

***** So you prefer Arab colonialism? Or indigenous dictatorship?

I'm surprised how complicit your courts and law enforcement have been - Tommy Robinson for example. It's one thing to turn a blind eye to certain activities if they fit some political agenda. It's another thing when your own citizens are having crimes committed against them because of those political agendas. People's civil rights are being violated.

You seriously need to exchange your remedial, Anglo-centric presumptions for a well-versed and objective view of history. Parliament was a universal development throughout Christian Europe. It was just referred to by different names other than "Parliament" in the Continent, obviously, because they spoke different languages (with English being the easiest to learn). Each empire (which were all complacent & considered cutting edge in relativity to it's time period) arose in Europe, because each one was reverse-engineering technology & influence from elder empire(s), thus having more pronounced philosophical & historical resources to utilize with each new emanation, which eventually made it possible to make our freedoms & education widely accessible (not necessarily outright invented, all inventions are quasi-inventions based on influence or circumstance), which was not possible before the Renaissance/ Early Modern Era, because Europe was in a state of barbarism & backwardness, thus precipitating the need for martial law. However, the foundations of our modern science & economy, the concepts of human & international rights, the influence of Roman-Greco Antiquity were all originally being preserved by the Catholic Church and was being taught in the university system that the Church invented that is still today's modern university system (not to mention there was no written language in Europe before the University system). Even the Founding Fathers of America admit their many influences, dating back to the Medo-Persian ruler Cyrus the Great. You need to listen to more Americans like InfoWars Alex Jones and Liberty School's Tom Woods who discuss Providence, accountability, empathy & real economics/ history. Some "wankers" (mostly fringy lemmings who scurry in the face of public accountability, because they know they would be ridiculed for clinging to their primordial & obsolete imperialist, social darwinist science fiction, which is ultimately nothing but a Zionist tool to justify controlling the world's Central Banks, including England's.) You should also learn that industriousness is very much based on whether the land is any good (as well as economy). Germany & America did the same thing England did in this regard, and of course, molded & polished it to it's respective circumstance & time period. Imagine arid regions trying to have an industrial revolution to the degree of said nations. Only a neanderthal would think that has anything to do with biology.

I recommend 'how we invented freedom and why it matters' first.

Ah shit! a French Frog right here. They are still mad their is not French 1st world nation other than France.

finalfrontier001 Catholic British Eurofederalist.

+finalfrontier001 At a stretch you have Quebec in Canada which is part of the francosphere and is 1st world.

Illimitable Man Quebec was named by British man called Doncaster. The queen granted your language to be spoken and the British built Montreal from little village from 1756 to 1973. Quebec is first world cuz of the English man.

How so?

***** Yes I agree the unions were terrible. However imagine if Scargill had known the damage he could have done had he been a banker and not a trade unionists. Nine years after the financial crash which started in the USA under a right wing president we are still seeing the affects of that debacle, just look at your bank book. Oh and before you blame Brown who was not exactly my cup of tea in fact I thought Blair should have sacked him, the financial crisis in 2007 was in the Private sector not the public apart from Greece, It was a banking and financial sector disaster. Also note at the time Brown was being told by both Osborne and Cameron that he was too heavy handed with regulations and should employ a lighter touch. I agree that Trade Unions at that time were in the wrong and needed to be brought under control but they did nowhere near the damage to the UK economy that was done by the financial sector a lot of which was found to be illegal. Note also several trade unionists ended up in front of the courts for disobeying the law, perhaps you can tell me which bankers were penalized. In fact we saw the opposite, many walked away from the disasters they were responsible for with lottery type compensation packages.

and a purse string controlling left-wing Congress?

+Perseus Wong What is sad is seeing the state of affairs in Greece.

True guy is wise, but he misses the natural law underlying common law, or maybe he does it on purpose. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_law common law v cannon law.

“Slaves, women and children were owned and had no rights at all and could be put to death at will. You have an idealised view of ancient history.” Please explain how judicial process and civil rights for slaves, women and children in 10th and 11th century England was superior to the secular legal system established by the late Roman Republic. I was making the point that our modern legal system or notions of liberty evolved from a distant point in history while the title of this video suggests that it is the English who "invented" the concept of Freedom. (See the Title). The idea and word 'Liberty' has its roots in Greek and Latin. This is a fact and not an attempt to idealized the ancient world.

No but that's no the point it was in the anglosphere that those ideas reached their pinnacle. Same can be said for the free market enterprise system, it was actually founded in the northern Italian states, matured throughout main land Europe and then perfected in England before absolutely flourishing in the New whole thanks to America. Read a book freak

+Perseus Wong and for the record you yet to do a quarter of the research this man has done, but I might be wrong you could know more than him in which case it begs the question what the hell are you doing commenting on yt videos go write your own book.

All the Anglosphere nations share the same ideology and similar culture.

Privatised healthcare, privatised police force and prison services, the death penalty, poor education rankings, high gun crime and murder rate, racial tensions, obesity, suicide... nah, you're alright. I'll stick with Western Europe, thanks.

PsychosisFire Continental European countries have always ended up with collectivist authoritarian regimes one way or another. Never happens in the Anglosphere we must be doing something right.

Bruno TaTa did you read Adios America? You are on point. If we closed our borders, regressively repeal all anchor babies, and work on assimilating the rest of our immigrant population to believe in the english/American values, then I guarantee our world will start looking like 1950's America than the multicultural hell hole we see today. the immigrants coming from medieval backwards cultures are bringing down our average, otherwise we would be having top score across the board. I'm an Asian but we are the most assimilated group and thus the model immigrant. We are an example of bringing in immigrants that share American Values. It is sad that as an Asian, I'm more American than the communists that roam our country. I love this country, and desperately want it to go back to our values.

Agent Smith Is that ideology called colonialism?

Done that. In high school, and college. But now I'm an adult, and I've continued to learn about the world in the previous decade. By all means, seek out different points of view. But keep in mind... When you discover some exciting new idea that seems to make sense of everything... Realize that you are actually just like everyone else. And that there are many competing narratives that can sound equally compelling. Then you'll be at a good place to START thinking seriously about these kinds of issues.

Noam Chomsky is a socialist. He supported the Khmer Rouge. How could you even use him for this.

bighands69 Recently Chomsky has found himself at odds with the trad hard left, like Nick Cohen ( author of " What's Left?) They are appalled at the Lefts "sympathy with anti Jewish demonstrations. In Britain hordes of far left filth marched alongside radical Islamists holding banners claiming ---- "We're ALL Hezbollah now" But YES he is still otherwise deluded.

wasabimanic Clarification He (Chomsky) and Cohen are appalled by the hard left

wasabimanic The left tend to fight among them self anyway. That is how they operate.

Mr. Paine sounds like he didn't know much about the English civil war.

@@djb1273 we Christian’s have the oldest known declaration of freedom get over it!!!

+Ralf Rath In which past societies did we not have slavery??? The Romans had slaves, Egypt had slaves, The slaves from Africa were sold into slavery by other Africans who themselves owned slaves! people are so foolish, slaves aren't a product of White or Anglo's they are the product of humanity.

Magna Carta - Bill of rights and Slavery?

Yes - this is exact the point! Magna Carta, Bill of Rights and Slavery - how this!

American war of independence came before French revolution. Britain abolished slavery first. Not sure what your point is here.

Yes - and this was the reason why Britain fought with USA? People in a colony are not free people - Britain abolished nothing!

What a witty comment (not). How does loving ones country equate to needing to love Europe?