Invisible Warriors: How the NGAD's Thermal Cloak Redefines Stealth
Рет қаралды 83,399
Күн бұрын🔒Remove your personal information from the web at JoinDeleteMe.com/TOG and use code TOG for 20% off 🙌
DeleteMe international Plans: international.joindeleteme.com
The NGAD fighter will not just be low observable to radar - but also to thermal (heat seeking) sensors. Find out how this could work, and what it means for military aviation.
Join this channel to get access to perks: / @pilotphotog
OR
Support me on Patreon: / pilotphotog
Channel Members and Patrons get early access to videos, sneak previews, and other perks
Follow me on other social media for daily posts:
📸 Instagram - / pilotphotog
📖Facebook - / pilotphotog
🎙 Podcast: pilotphotog.buzzsprout.com/
🐦Twitter - / pilotphotog
👾Twitch: / pilotphotog
🎮 Discord: / discord
Credits/Attributions:
"The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement."
Department of Defense
Northrop Grumman
Lockheed Martin
Boeing
Raytheon
Pratt & Whitney
General Electric
All animations are produced by me, Tog and are property of this channel.
Opinions expressed are solely my own and do not express the views or opinions of the DOD, any government or company, now you know!
@PilotPhotog 2 ай бұрын
🔒Remove your personal information from the web at JoinDeleteMe.com/TOG and use code TOG for 20% off 🙌 DeleteMe international Plans: international.joindeleteme.com
@jonniiinferno9098 2 ай бұрын
Fun Fact - you probably already know - BUT - just in case ---- the F-117 was first used against Panama - when we went in and captured Noriega
@markbrisec3972 2 ай бұрын
Not the Phantom... My vote goes to F-25 Ghost....
@M3PH11 2 ай бұрын
the thing with the tiles on the shuttle was, they were there to stop the things underneath melting. The tiles on the f-117 and B-2 are there to reduce the heat signature. These 2 ideas are very different so it is unlikely they are the same material
@teddy.d174 2 ай бұрын
Especially given that the SST tiles were all silica/sand based that were baked and the new ones appear to be constructed using advanced additive composite/ceramic materials.
@larryc1616 2 ай бұрын
Based on B-21 tech
@scottnj2503 2 ай бұрын
To bad there's no prize for getting concept anticipation rendering correct. I think you're gonna end up being close Tog. Your research is always great. p.s. If memory serves, the paint on the SR-71 was something called iron-ball paint. Had a texture akin to sand paper. The additional surface area helped dissipate heat and possibly had some radar stealth contribution.
@johnshowinc Ай бұрын
I felt the edge of the SR71. It was smooth like one of those grey grit sandpapers. It was awesome, there is one at a museum in McMinnville Oregon
@W1ckedRcL 2 ай бұрын
This concept is definitely related to the mirrored coating that's been tested on our currant stealth aircraft.
@getahanddown 2 ай бұрын
And also 'where is all the glitter going?' conspiracy. Glitter is anti IRST chaff? Glitter is in the chrome / cRaptor coatings being tested?
@jtjames79 2 ай бұрын
@@getahanddown MOAB is a glitter bomb. It's nearly the perfect material to make a thermobaric weapon. Just need to raise the nitrate levels of the substrate, and oxidize the metallics. Kaboom. 💥
@alphazero6571 2 ай бұрын
trust me.. if we know about they have done it 20 years ago.. they already have craft that can mirror the sky above on its belly.. the leadin edge of the wing ionized with plasma actuators to reduce drag.. they have stealth helicopters that you wouldnt hear flying above you.. even the director of lockheed skunkworks ben rich said before he died that we have stuff in the desert that would make george lucas envious.. he even went as far as saying that we have now means of taking the E.T home, but it would take an act of god for these projects to ever see the light of day.
@larryc1616 2 ай бұрын
Yes, chrome F-35's and F-22's have been spotted.
@W1ckedRcL 2 ай бұрын
@@larryc1616 and F117s
@FloridaManMatty 2 ай бұрын
Phantom was on my short list too, but while the Navy has no problem keeping names for a succession of vessels, to date, the Air Force has never given the same name to three aircraft. The Navy’s first jet was the FH-1 Phantom. The F-4 was the Phantom II. USAF NGAD will either stay with the bird of prey naming standard (Eagle, Fighting Falcon, Raptor, etc…) OR they’re going to go all DEI and name it the YF-25 Ru Paul or something ridiculous like that… 😊 On the same line as “Phantom” we DO have Phantasm, Wraith (my current favorite), Shadow, OR, since the NGAD will arguably be a sort of a “shape shifter” through various EM bands, the name “Eidolon” would be pretty damn awesome. At the very least it would send a lot of people scrambling for their dictionary…
@markbernero9302 2 ай бұрын
The USAF has given the same name to 3 aircraft. The C-17 is called Globemaster III.
@FloridaManMatty 2 ай бұрын
@@markbernero9302INDEED THEY HAVE!!! Well caught, man! C-74, C-124, and the C-17. Nice!! In that case, “Phantom” would be a great name and would carry on with tradition, which they are rather big on… Thanks for the correction, Mark.
@KijanaMBrajon 2 ай бұрын
i want to call it the F-91 "Sneakyboi"
@terryfreeman1018 2 ай бұрын
I'm already calling it old sneaky booty 44.69. But that's just me.
@terryfreeman1018 2 ай бұрын
Sneakyboi mcplaneface Diddy booty. I'm with you all, yall been at this longer, you're the professionals
@terryfreeman1018 2 ай бұрын
@texasranger24 you've done this before. I'm just a beginner.
@CalvinHsuChen Ай бұрын
Did you just assume they gender?
@BLD426 Ай бұрын
Sounds good.😁
@christopherfelker5524 2 ай бұрын
Back about 15 years ago Popular Mechanics/Popular Science Magazine (then my favorite ummm sitting in peace and relief daily activity) there were a numerous articles about also using optical fiber to translate the light from the top of the plane to the bottom to mask it optically from the ground
@Gunni1972 2 ай бұрын
Now that'll be a cheap solution.(sarcasm) It requires a Single Body part design. (No maintenance or gear hatches, weapons bays, fuel ports, as you would have to interrupt those fibers) so basically, for every Landing, or refuel, you have to take off it's entire skin. That'll be funny to watch. You get the drift: It's not possible. And Popular Mechanics should have said so.
@Jeff55369 Ай бұрын
@Gunni1972 Certainly it's more involved than what they're currently doing, but it's not as difficult as you might think. Hinged panels that rotate out of the way, paired with 'epaper' leds to preserve curved surfaces. There was actually some primitive testing of this tech in iraq with ground troops, though I'm not sure what they determined with those tests.
@xyz-hj6ul 10 күн бұрын
@@Gunni1972 Aviation Week, late 80s to mid 90s had an article in which it was stated as open fact that A-10s painted with materials having self aligning fibers in the carrier could _change color_, with a simple voltage application to the edge of the resulting grid. Self repairing with a touch up too. They got robins egg blue, red and black out of it and when it was turned off, it actually functioned as a low grade RAM. Also Aviation Week: Sometime in the early 2000s, 'an elite few' were allowed to see a B-2 in a private hangar at Le Bourget, when someone flipped a switch, it also changed colors, matching the background. The point being, back when they published a magazine that was worth reading, and could be viewed in most libraries, the U.S. aerospace propaganda mouth piece was talking about _admitted_ abilities similar to what the first poster described.
@RJO6581 2 ай бұрын
So THIS is why we’ve seen pictures of “chrome” Raptors the past few year!
@jeffreyzaleski412 25 күн бұрын
Thank you for your kindness and letting nosy people like myself find out all the neat things our Military has to protect us with. This is unbelievable, I’m a Retired Vietnam PJ and love 💗 to research things. THANK YOU AGAIN.
@rjames4427 2 ай бұрын
F-44 Phantom would be perfect‼️ You hit that right on the money, how do we make it a reality⁉️ It’s too perfect a name to miss out on the opportunity…
@mikeharvey9184 2 ай бұрын
It would need top be called the Phantom III, but yeah, F-44 Phantom III would be perfect.
@BoraHorzaGobuchul 2 ай бұрын
Why 44? To scare the chicom with two death numbers? :)
@mikeharvey9184 2 ай бұрын
@@BoraHorzaGobuchulF-44 because the previous Phantom was the F-4... I forgot the significance of "4" in Chinese culture, so that works too 😆
@everettputerbaugh3996 2 ай бұрын
In Japanese, Shi (pronounced she, as in female in English) is either 4 or death, giving rise to using Yon for 4 instead. Ah, the F-4 Phantom II: America's proof to the world that given enough thrust you can make a brick fly. Too bad they relied on unreliable missile technology to defend it.
@mikeharvey9184 2 ай бұрын
@@everettputerbaugh3996 I seem to remember (but could easily be wrong) Korean is similar. I think the flying brick analogy also makes an F-44 Phantom III more appropriate… the NGAD is going to rely on speed and stealth over maneuverability, effectively making it a flying stealth brick. 😁
@teddy.d174 2 ай бұрын
Your graphics have become next level imaginative and nobody is doing anything close to your content, nor the quality. Well done sir, much appreciated. Phantom has been my choice since we started learning a significant amount of details, regarding the NGAD. Also on my list in no particular order are… Voodoo Ghost Black Widow
@zlm001 2 ай бұрын
I your suggestions except for Black Widow. Too many negative connotations for the crew, although it would be badass if they went for it anyways just to have a fighter named for a spider.
@PilotPhotog 2 ай бұрын
Thank you Ted! I try to learn a new animation technique for each video - really appreciate your comment and support my friend. Here's to the F-38 Phantom III
@jamesjohnson1710 2 ай бұрын
For me this is something new and the ability to track aircraft by heat signature has been around for some time now and it will be great to be able to defeat these systems thanks for the info
@MarxMin 2 ай бұрын
Excellent video Pilot photog absolutely love your work!
@teddy.d174 2 ай бұрын
In the words of the great Tina Turner, along with one simple word change…He’s simply the best.
@PilotPhotog 2 ай бұрын
Thank you, glad you enjoy my work. April will have one video every Friday so be sure to subscribe and follow - cheers!
@phillm156 2 ай бұрын
Phantom 3! I like that name!
@dandaintac388 2 ай бұрын
While I agree the name of Phantom would be perfect, often it seems pilots coin a nickname that winds up sticking. There are exceptions, the Eagle and Raptor were well-named. But often there are nicknames given--especially when planes are named after famous WW2 warbirds. A-10 Thunderbolt II was called the Warthog instead. The F-35 Lightning I hear is being called the Panther by pilots. The F16s were called Vipers, not "Fighting Falcons", and so on. The pilots and aircrew seem to get the last say.
@jonniiinferno9098 2 ай бұрын
and thankfully so...
@dandaintac388 2 ай бұрын
@danhill372 I wasn't aware that nickname had been coined for the F-35 LOL--I had to look up "Fat Amy". I just hope it's performance is better than the unflattering nickname--but then again the Warthog also did not have a flattering nickname.
@Jeff55369 Ай бұрын
@@dandaintac388 wild warthogs are extremely dangerous.
@michaeltillman886 Ай бұрын
My friend. You gave honor to a fighter that goes straight to the hart. The F4 Phantom. I was a Hydraulic Tech in the Air Force in the early 70s, stationed in Thailand. I had the privilege to be able to work on that beast of a fighter. By the way, great presentation. Peace, my friend!
@a.teague4837 2 ай бұрын
Great report sir! Being able to collect & review this kind of information on one of the most highly guarded secret projects there are must be a daunting task. Thanks for sharing.
@Gunni1972 2 ай бұрын
Wanna hear a report of my dream too? 34 trillion$ Army gets confiscated to pay debts.
@AdamosDad Ай бұрын
Phantom, I like it, having seen an F4 go supersonic, at about 100 yards at 75 feet go past my ship about 54 years ago, something you never forget. The next thing for stealthy fighters would be sound reduction, over land it is a giveaway that something is on the way.
@recoilrob324 2 ай бұрын
The 'fly in the ointment' of thermal stealth is in the air the aircraft just flew through. Even if you can mask the aircraft itself from IR emissions....the air behind it will be disrupted and turbulent and I believe this is what future systems will be trying to find and track rather than just the vehicle itself.
@stephenmiller2544 2 ай бұрын
That's very interesting. That means they would have to move through the air without disturbing it. I'm fairly certain they are in the early to mid testing stages of understanding / developing materials that allow them to do just that. Implementing these materials in real world applications publicly are 10-20 years away.
@Ottee2 2 ай бұрын
@@stephenmiller2544 , You're fairly certain? What planet are you from? When an object moves through the air, on this planet, that is, by definition, disturbance.
@rchot84 2 ай бұрын
Air can become turbulent on it's own, but I am guessing it would have a different signature.
@Jeff55369 Ай бұрын
interesting concept. would mean missiles would start being developed in a similar way to torpedos. Find the path traveled, and shoot up it's tail pipe. That means planes would have a very good chance of outrunning them though. And you could make decoys that would create a big turbulent mess to throw off pursuing missiles.
@trevor21241842 2 ай бұрын
Ngad is making me so patriotic 😂🇺🇸🫡🫡😩😩
@joshschneider9766 2 ай бұрын
im extremely curious how samarium oxide is being publicized when radar absorbent materials specifics are codeword material.
@jpx1508 2 ай бұрын
great graphics and rendering - watched the vid twice just to enjoy the variety of the images.
@susanartigas7498 2 ай бұрын
Amazing video.
@PilotPhotog 2 ай бұрын
Thank you! I spend many, many hours rendering these images on my PC it makes me smile when someone points them out in the comments. I'm working on renders for a video that will be out April 12 so be sure to check back here on the channel then!
@JSFGuy 2 ай бұрын
Let's have a look
@Firechief100 2 ай бұрын
Great channel.
@kj1483 2 ай бұрын
10:21 coating that emits the same amount of thermal radiation independent of its temperature, within a temperature range of about 30 °C. This is accomplished using samarium nickel oxide (SmNiO3)-a quantum material that changes strongly but gradually as a function of temperature. The scientists attribute this evolution of its optical properties over the temperature range of ∼40 to ∼140 °C to a fully reversible and hysteresis-free thermally driven insulator-to-metal transition (IMT). ZERO DIFFERENTIAL EMITTER 2019 University Wisconsin Madison
@Gunni1972 2 ай бұрын
Even older fighter jets exceed that fuselage temperature though, and if you talk really high speeds, you are in a multiple of that heat range rather quick.
@kj1483 2 ай бұрын
mine comment was copy and paste a after keywords google search... I hope info about ZDE gets explained further for us. Your reply prompted another google search....."The skin temperature drops initially as the aircraft climbs due to exposure to decreasing ambient air temperatures. As the speed increases above about Mach 1, where the temperature begins to increase, the skin temperature reaches a maximum of 120°C (248°F) after exposure while cruising at Mach 2.2." @@Gunni1972
@nommchompsky 2 ай бұрын
I'm guessing that thermal stealth will involve keeping the bottom of the aircraft as flat as possible, so friction only happens on the top half of the aircraft and only radiates upwards, sort of like how the bottom of the F-117 is totally flat. I'm also guessing that all leading edges will be actively cooled.
@gnarlycarlson9600 2 ай бұрын
A minor addition to NGAD that I think may happen with it or will soon be used is a weapons bay door that does not swing down when it opens, this has been a problem with the f22 and f35 that they are detectable when bay door is open. I sliding panel of some sort would eliminate much of this problem.
@hermanlopez2945 2 ай бұрын
Pretty cool
@MatPost 2 ай бұрын
XFA-33 Fenrir from Ace Combat X: Skies of Deception has optical camouflage, the same technology used by the airborne fortress from the same game, Gleipnir.
@stephenmiller2544 2 ай бұрын
it exists, and if you know who the Interceptors are, they nicknamed it the "Switchblade", Because of an old Northrop Grumman concept patent. and once again if you know who the Interceptors are, then you know they don't give nicknames to things they haven't actually seen. And I'm not talking about the Aurora or the SR-72.
@Er19421 2 ай бұрын
My pet theory is that the two prototypes were the X-63 and X-64, making the NGAD and F/A-XX the F-63 and/or F-64
@stars7744 2 ай бұрын
My thoughts exactly. Even the timeline matches up with what Kendall said.
@TroyRubert 2 ай бұрын
You can't break the laws of physics, but you can bend them.
@Anarchy_420 Ай бұрын
Names-- Banshee, Terminator, Ghost Hawk, Legion, Demigod, Skynet, and Indoraptor!
@BrianRaynor-gx6et Ай бұрын
F-43 specter = something widely feared but hard to define
@games1004 Ай бұрын
The name becoming the F-66 Wisp sounds like an appropriate name... 1) Name it after the "Will-o'-the-wisp;" after a folklore flame that leads you, but cannot be reached; a ghost or spirit; a "foolish flame" (as in "it would be a fool's errand to catch it, or it will lead you to death"). 2) You may hear the WhISP-er of it the wind, but you'll never see where it came from, or where it went. 3) If you hear the Wisp, you weren't the target. 4) Don't face the Wisp, you can't reach it. 5) If you follow the "foolish flame," joke's on you. 6) It is but a wispy spirit, here one minute, gone the next. Etc...👻 It's like the B2 "Spirit," but even more hidden.
@Starpopper800 Ай бұрын
PHANTOM‼
@brahma6549 2 ай бұрын
I worked on the ngad but recently retired. Truth is we have anti gravity as well as anti matter based propulsion system. Visible active camouflage as well. Also the plane is shaped like a donut 🍩
@EDCandLace 2 ай бұрын
Come on now...
@k9raven960 2 ай бұрын
I like your idea for Phantom as the name.
@tplummer217 2 ай бұрын
I agree, phantom f5
@Dv087 23 күн бұрын
Great video. My name suggestion: Wraith
@Christian-fg3we 2 ай бұрын
The NGAD with the new Aim 260 with a few drone wingmen who can operate as Aim 260 missile trucks is going to be absolutely devastating. The US currently has air superiority, but once the NGAD is in service I believe it will just be completely ridiculous for any enemy to even attempt air combat against the US for decades to come.
@bradleylomas7525 2 ай бұрын
I dont want my data deleted by ignorant brokers. Im learning how to sue them for copy right, theft, illegal creation of funds
@TK199999 2 ай бұрын
A few years ago there was big development in ceramic based stealth coatings. That immediately got classified and disappeared from public knowledge.
@captjinxmarine9832 Ай бұрын
I’m a retired electro-mechanical engineer and Marine Captain, you don’t know how many times I scream when these ya-oohs talk about stealth and their math is so far off. Half of them are still using crayons. lol. You did a good explanation for most people. Thanks
@bullpupgaming708 2 ай бұрын
I think a better name would be the F-62 Cloaked Widow. It would pay homage to America's first night fighter the P-61 Black Widow
@DavidFMayerPhD 2 ай бұрын
Second Law of Thermodynamics states that waste heat MUST BE PRODUCED by any machine and must be removed to an external heat sink. So the NGAD must expel waste heat somehow, either by radiation (infrared) or transfer to the atmosphere. EVERY object emits thermal radiation at all times, regardless of its composition.
@BaddAtom 2 ай бұрын
probably active cooling at the exhaust it is simple and cheap.
@j.f.fisher5318 2 ай бұрын
I don't know if I buy being able to stop aerodynamic heating, but if you could then you can get to mach 5 with Blackbird tech.
@theayeguy5226 2 ай бұрын
Phantom III would be cool. That would be the first time a fighter name went into the third generation
@movingontorealfreedom7305 2 ай бұрын
I still think it should be called the Ghost. Maybe even “Stalker”. Lol.
@aerospacematt9147 Ай бұрын
F-44 Phantom III. Interesting name choice.
@alxboca Ай бұрын
If all this speculation pans out, an awesomely fitting name would be WRAITH.
@johnslugger 2 ай бұрын
*Hyper-sonic planes and missiles have so much plasma surrounding them they are automatically INVISIBLE to Radar and infrared detection.*
@cinemasurge1851 Ай бұрын
While it is true it is much harder to track them reliably, it is definitely not invisible, as hypersonic missiles have been shot down before
@johnslugger Ай бұрын
@@cinemasurge1851 *Russia has FAST MISSILES but they are not really TRUE hyper-sonic level yet.*
@gibbsm 2 ай бұрын
I'm down with "Phantom III".
@andreww1225 2 ай бұрын
Phantom is good. They should call the drones that fly with it minions. That’s the best I got lol
@gregpeabody8536 2 ай бұрын
I understand why you made the change, but the YF-22 was not code named Raptor, it was code named Lighting II. I kind of get why the production planes underwent the name change, but I've always thought it was confusing and stupid to reuse Lighting II for the F-35.
@WolfeSaber9933 2 ай бұрын
For my idea of a sixth generation category fighter, I worried about the thermal signature especially because I plan on it going past mach 3 for supercruising as it is meant to have a range past 3,000 nmi. But now, I see hope😊
@Aeronaut1975 2 ай бұрын
If it's supersonic, it will be leaving a supersonic shockwave, which can be tracked.
@WolfeSaber9933 2 ай бұрын
@@Aeronaut1975 The sonic boom, not when the data from the X-59 gets used.
@Likeaworm 2 ай бұрын
@@Aeronaut1975cope
@SparklySpencer Ай бұрын
10:40 It may have some applications, IF the material science is capable of being adapted to SLOWER AIRCRAFT IN THEORY, the structural integrity of the airframe, the existing RAM coatings, the interplay of different components... Essentially the skin of the craft would need good heat transference. It's always a game of cat and catch up / mouse. Different sensors may be able to detect the next invention thus continuing our technological advancement -- besides thermals differences may still be able to be seen from space, depending on resolutions and sensor types -- and considering the interplay with better and faster communication relays between constituent components such as the concept of loyal wingman, one could theorize additional information from different government satellite resources being directly accessed by airframes.
@ericclausen6772 27 күн бұрын
You can't see me can you see what kind of technologies we have here in America The Beautiful FREEDOM!!!! Is a experience you just need to try at least once in your life
@MrStevenMosher 2 ай бұрын
b2 and yf23 both used shuttle tiles on the aft deck
@chadhagans6687 2 ай бұрын
Phantom is a great name
@JSFGuy 2 ай бұрын
Houdini strikes again.
@shilohlee4332 21 күн бұрын
If it needs a special coating to be Invisible to IR, how does that interfere with the RAM coating?
@mikepatterson6416 2 ай бұрын
Chinese handlers probably already have access to the "top secret" coating. In fact, it's probably still in Mar-a-Largo.
@JinKee 2 ай бұрын
Thermal cloak like the SSV Normandy
@PilotPhotog 2 ай бұрын
Mass Effect was such a great game, and I think your comment is the first ME reference on my channel - Bravo Zulu!
@rjwiechman 2 ай бұрын
I'm OK with retiring the name "Phantom." It was a seriously flawed plane. How about the "Nightwing?"
@henrikerdland578 2 ай бұрын
Great video, as always 👍 But what if quantum radars get realty. I guess Raytheon is working on it as well.
@jlsmithdowntown 2 ай бұрын
The navy’s ngad Should be called shadow cat
@williambruce189 Ай бұрын
It's oled panels that show a picture of the other side to appear as if it's not there.
@mikethompson2650 2 ай бұрын
I wonder if the mirror finish on some F22s is for thermal reasons? Oh, I worked on the F4E when I was in the USAF back in the mid-70s, so Phantom III would work fo rme. However I am 71 so I doubt if I will live long enough to see the bird flying.
@bleachorange 2 ай бұрын
Im still a fan of the name grey ghost 😂 But I think its time for a new budget item to be called aurora 🤣
@RobertCunningham-cw4bv 2 ай бұрын
Hang in there Mike !! You should be watching with the rest of us in a very few years ! And I'm only 10 years behind you 👍👍
@rustyshaklferd1897 2 ай бұрын
I had the idea of cameras and screens projecting what’s behind it 2 decades ago. I’m sure they are far beyond anything I could have thought of. The toads and stealth should easily handle radar threats leaving thermal which I imagine the toads are effective against them. The thermal cloaking should be quite advanced and the icing on the cake when combined with the aforementioned defenses combined with drone wingmen that are a far juicier target than the plane.
@dancotterman1267 2 ай бұрын
They have that technology in a cloak like hog warts used. But it wouldn’t be good for heat invisiblity. I’m sure they have lots of stuff we have no clue about, yet.
@shilohlee4332 21 күн бұрын
Didn't the AbramsX demonstrator have the capability to change what it looked like when viewed in IR/NODS? I remember seeing a video of it lit up in greyscale, and then fading into a much smaller, and distinct, vehicle.
@Eh2Solar 23 күн бұрын
You need a magnetic envelop to reduce the heat on the surface and more power to do so without the tale of fire even if you hide it the way you do.
@keatoncrandall2471 2 ай бұрын
Tracked by the IRS(T). Clever name.
@rustyshaklferd1897 2 ай бұрын
Simply flowing prechilled fuel through veins throughout the airframe near the skin could be enough to throw off ir detection.
@Gunni1972 2 ай бұрын
I can see that as a solution, as it was done on the SR-71. But it would have to be done on the entire skin of the plane, which would require additive manufacturing for the entire surface in- and outside. And i don't think, any mechanic would EVER want to clean that.
@timbaskett6299 2 ай бұрын
Next up in the stealth threshold, acoustic. 😂
@bleachorange 2 ай бұрын
shhh, im listening for aliens
@mikekopack6441 2 ай бұрын
Effectively already being worked on with that NASA SST sonic boom limiting test plane...
@GladBeastBoy 2 ай бұрын
@@mikekopack6441oh yeah they are trying to direct the boom upwards right? Or something like that
@rockreed3989 2 ай бұрын
Name it the Ghost. That's appropriate
@mikalnaylor 2 ай бұрын
It would be the "Phantom III" as there have been 2 Phantoms before it. :)
@Sect10n31 2 ай бұрын
Call it the SR-Deadly One or just call it DEADLY.
@piotrd.4850 2 ай бұрын
You still need to vent excess heat from engine, not to mention exhaust. Also remember - YF-23 with GE F-120s had power equal roughly to frakin' Concorde. No way to hide it.
@BoraHorzaGobuchul 2 ай бұрын
You don't always have to go full throttle. So they could reduce thrust and hence heat signature to manageable levels unless they need top performance. Also, there's the concept of disposable heat sinks in SF. Unlikely to be usable at the current tech level but who knows when it becomes so.
@JinKee 2 ай бұрын
If you’re moving fast, the air itself suffers compressive heating in front of the aircraft
@PilotPhotog 2 ай бұрын
Great point and we will see - eventually - how the heat detection problem is solved. Thanks for commenting and being a subscriber!
@JinKee 2 ай бұрын
@@PilotPhotog as far as i know, stealthy experiments like the RQ-3 DarkStar solve the compressive heating problem by flying slow and having long endurance. Unmanned platforms don’t need to dogfight.
@CAPEjkg Ай бұрын
What about the adaptive camouflage work that's been done? Hmmm.
@theayeguy5226 2 ай бұрын
Why didn't you use the mirror skin you did in previous episodes? That's already flying on the F22 and F35 and is probably this new thermal sheilding material
@larryblanks6765 Ай бұрын
Just planely name it the Ghost!
@iplz 2 ай бұрын
What effect does Aerogel have on stealth
@rchot84 2 ай бұрын
F-24-29 Owl. The most stealth bird of prey.
@JaimeGerman-vc5ut 2 ай бұрын
use a shield behind the buster to cool down the fighter jets engine it be cool down the Heat on the aircraft by using a material
@Neeboopsh 2 ай бұрын
i would love to see the yf23 airframe brought into the japanese airforce. or something that looks like it. but with the computer capability now, everything will be tailless to really drop the radar cross section.
@Jeff55369 Ай бұрын
imo, the f4 is too recent to be stealing it's namesake. Some alternatives if you want to keep a similar style: ghost (a bit of a nod to the f23), haunt, shade, shadow, specter, wraith.
@youtubasoarus 2 ай бұрын
I'd imagine at some point cryogenic fluid pumped through the skin of the craft could drop it to ambient.
@blueDog697 2 ай бұрын
Phantom's good, but I'm throwing the name wraith out there, poltergeist for the unmanned version.
@deadeye4520 2 ай бұрын
Phantom is a great name, but I'm partial to Specter.
@ph11p3540 2 ай бұрын
The Phantom 3
@penroc3 2 ай бұрын
here is a hint, there is a picture in public domine, it will have a tail the the original B2. cloaking skin on craft is easy look at BAE's thermal tiles that in less than a second appeared in IR to be a small car, if this aircraft is going to have any secret stealth it will be thermal AND visual
@ThisIsHarderThanIThought 2 ай бұрын
how will NGAD be undteectable when current radar are able to detact UFOs in the sky?
@kaneo1 Ай бұрын
NGAD needs to go back and use the unused F-19 designation & fictional Ghost Rider name. But will the coatings be durable enough to survive multiple flights?
@DuranDuran31 2 ай бұрын
Will this be more advanced than the Aurora.
@mikesahle1193 2 ай бұрын
Thank you 🙏 I know people in USA 🇺🇸 they never stop creating New the next step ☝️thanks 👏👏👏☮️👍🎥
@Gunni1972 2 ай бұрын
Next step to armageddon isn't exactly "Advancing" though.
@mikesahle1193 2 ай бұрын
@@Gunni1972 thank you 🙏 it would be new for me ☝️have a joyful day 👋
@juancarrero1119 2 ай бұрын
How did we get there stealth freaking 👽👹🙏🏼
@zybertronseven 2 ай бұрын
Let's see these requirements: 1. Invisible to radar 2. Invisible to optics 3. Able to fly to space thru ion/plasma propulsion 4. Laser capabilities 5. Reduce velocity to zero, followed by immediate spherical combat rotational capability. 6. Anti EMP materials.
PilotPhotog
Рет қаралды 378 М.
Growling Sidewinder
Рет қаралды 213 М.