Ion Propulsion - The Plane With No Moving Parts

  Рет қаралды 4,363,158

Real Engineering

Real Engineering

5 жыл бұрын

Get 2 months of Skillshare for FREE using this link: skl.sh/realengineering18
New vlog channel: / @brianmcmanus
Patreon:
www.patreon.com/user?u=282505...
Facebook:
/ realengineering1
Instagram:
/ brianjamesmcmanus
Twitter:
/ thebrianmcmanus
Discord:
/ discord
Get your Real Engineering shirts at: standard.tv/collections/real-...
Credits:
Narrator/Director: Brian McManus
Co-Director: Mike Ridolfi (www.moboxgraphics.com/)
Sound: Graham Haerther (haerther.net/)
Thumbnail: Simon Buckmaster / forgottentowel
References:
[1] www.nasa.gov/centers/glenn/ab...
[2] web.stanford.edu/~boyd/papers...
[3] go.nature.com/2CC86cw
[4] rspa.royalsocietypublishing.or...
Music by Epidemic Sound: epidemicsound.com/creator
Songs:
Solving It Together 1 - Gunnar Johnsén
Timepass 1 - Gunnar Johnsén
A Trip To The Moon - Aiolos Rue
Emoticon 17 - Niclas Gustavsson
Positive Process - From Now On
Thank you to my patreon supporters: Adam Flohr, Henning Basma, Karl Andersson, Mark Govea, Hank Green, William Leu, Jason A., Chris Plays Games, Tristan Edwards, Ken Coltan, Andrew McCorkell, Ian Dundore, John & Becki Johnston. Nevin Spoljaric, Jason Clark, Christopher Lam, Deven Warren Rathbun.

Пікірлер: 4 400
@VuLiOm
@VuLiOm 5 жыл бұрын
There are some minor mistakes in the video. The potential difference between the two electrodes (wire and wing) is 40kV, since the wire is charged to +20kV and the wing to -20kV. The voltage type is also DC and not AC. The DC voltage of the battery is converted to AC by a H-bridge circuit. This AC is transformed to a higher voltage level and finally converted to a high voltage DC by the Cockroft-Walton generator.
@IngoDingo
@IngoDingo 5 жыл бұрын
It has also been in "development" a lot longer. A paper describes the theories of ionic propulsion and is basically what they build today. In the paper they even say, that it will be possible they just don't have the technology to make the transformers etc small enough. (both was done my MIT tho)
@kitemanmusic
@kitemanmusic 5 жыл бұрын
It's rather ionic, don't you think? The thrust required will never be enough. It takes too long to build up enough thrust for regular flights. You don't want to take several months to fly somewhere.
@FrozenSniperShots
@FrozenSniperShots 5 жыл бұрын
kitemanmusic what if the plane already had propulsion flying in the air and instead a jet engine plane flew next to it to drop passengers in then landed and repeated
@UnloadingMouse
@UnloadingMouse 5 жыл бұрын
@Honey b. I don't think Allah has anything to do with this
@MDP1702
@MDP1702 5 жыл бұрын
@@FrozenSniperShots Or a hybrid if that's possible: jet propulsion to get into the air and get to the right speed and ion propulsion to just keep the same speed going.
@dominikskorjanc
@dominikskorjanc 5 жыл бұрын
I love that you dont push for that 10min mark
@RealEngineering
@RealEngineering 5 жыл бұрын
Hearting this for visibility mostly. 1. I don't put ads on my videos for the first month, so there is little reason to try and place 2 ads. 2. People need to stop assuming that a videos length is determined by that. If I make a video just below 10 minutes I get praised, if I make a video above 10 minutes I get complaints. The videos are as long as they need to be, and I don't know single EDU channel that doesn't follow that principle.
@imerence6290
@imerence6290 5 жыл бұрын
Do you not want him to make money ?
@pug2858
@pug2858 5 жыл бұрын
@I Am Sekou youre a sociopath Hello there friend!
@unacceptablecanadian9550
@unacceptablecanadian9550 5 жыл бұрын
Why? 933 or 10 for cash, why should i give a shit?
@timcondon5184
@timcondon5184 5 жыл бұрын
@@RealEngineering just keep up the great work. However long the video doesnt matter, when we can learn more
@lecolintube
@lecolintube 4 жыл бұрын
Love how the ion propelled plane looks remarkably similar to the right brothers plane of over 100 years ago.
@sirdeakia
@sirdeakia Жыл бұрын
Because, much like that one, it doesn't really fly.
@theonewhoknocks1976
@theonewhoknocks1976 Жыл бұрын
@@sirdeakia really how doesn’t it “really fly” just curious unless you mean it just glides
@deidyomega
@deidyomega Жыл бұрын
@@sirdeakia its flying, just poorly.
@nefarioulyte9996
@nefarioulyte9996 Жыл бұрын
@@deidyomega its falling sideways
@bazookaace
@bazookaace 4 жыл бұрын
Yall realize this is the first step in building a "twin ion engine" or TIE Fighter.
@RKroese
@RKroese 4 жыл бұрын
@@tripplefives1402 yeaaaah
@jaywu4804
@jaywu4804 4 жыл бұрын
@@tripplefives1402 Are you telling me that the cool sounds the TIEs make are not possible?
@sheilaolfieway1885
@sheilaolfieway1885 3 жыл бұрын
@@jaywu4804 sound is nothing but vibration and in space there's no medium for those vibrations to go through so yes, space is silent.
@WildBluntHickok
@WildBluntHickok 3 жыл бұрын
@@jaywu4804 The cool sounds the ties make are a guy in a 1930s movie screaming as he's eaten by a crocodile. It's the most overused scream in stock footage history. They just did some computer processing to the sound to make it sound more mechanical.
@nirui.o
@nirui.o 3 жыл бұрын
@@WildBluntHickok Well, just like people said: In space, no body can hear you scream unless you are being eaten by a space crocodile 🐊 while sitting in a metal ball.
@duncanmcgee13
@duncanmcgee13 5 жыл бұрын
Rare footage of TIE Fighter prototype being tested
@maverickf1426
@maverickf1426 5 жыл бұрын
TIE FIGHTERS CONFIRMED!
@skyeplaysgames6734
@skyeplaysgames6734 5 жыл бұрын
Ha
@duncanmcgee13
@duncanmcgee13 5 жыл бұрын
@Mikolaj Kraszewski what does that have to do with my comment?
@Zw285
@Zw285 5 жыл бұрын
Damit, you beat me to the joke.
@t65bx25
@t65bx25 5 жыл бұрын
TIE/sk “Striker”
@SimonClark
@SimonClark 5 жыл бұрын
Much as I know the physics, this is still magic to me
@j5892000
@j5892000 5 жыл бұрын
It's all just s reaction
@umeshhajare1733
@umeshhajare1733 5 жыл бұрын
It's engineering 😀😀😀
@phillipBappleton
@phillipBappleton 5 жыл бұрын
@@umeshhajare1733 It's actually plasma physics
@rizal2gbofficial663
@rizal2gbofficial663 5 жыл бұрын
@@umeshhajare1733 wipe
@WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs
@WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs 5 жыл бұрын
I recall a negative ion generator gadget. Apart from removing dust it had a very obvious detectable airflow.
@skyrex2465
@skyrex2465 4 жыл бұрын
Ion Engine: I am the first aircraft engine with no moving parts! Ramjets: Am I a joke to you? Scramjet: WTF dude?!
@teresawatson8936
@teresawatson8936 4 жыл бұрын
you must have valves and probably a pump(s) ... moving. Flaps, rudders ... hmmm...
@Freekniggers
@Freekniggers 4 жыл бұрын
Pulse jet: sky rex you suck you forgot me.
@allenstuder6938
@allenstuder6938 4 жыл бұрын
@@teresawatson8936 Ion planes also have flaps and rudders\
@randomcannon3260
@randomcannon3260 4 жыл бұрын
Paper Airplanes:
@matthewluttrell9413
@matthewluttrell9413 3 жыл бұрын
@@allenstuder6938 Actually that's one of the things that can be avoided. If instead of the racks the MIT team used you used pins along the surface of the airfoil, you could increase the airspeed over whichever airfoil you wanted. Somebody made a small RC plane that had a normal propeller but the pitch and roll was ion drive. It wasn't great but it was the idea XD
@BillDemos
@BillDemos 3 жыл бұрын
When I was developing atmospheric plasma systems for thin film deposition, I came accross the way one could make very dense plasmas (requiring a lot of amps but not many volts) in standard atmospheric conditions in air. This principle is used in plasma cutters: you make your initial spark using high voltage / low amperage and then, since your plasma is already conductive, you apply a second power source with a lot of amps. When you have a dense plasma in atmorpheric pressure, you can go WAAAY beyond the thrust density you see in MIT's prototype. I though it was a nice invention but then came the bad news: since you ionise air, you leave behind nitric acid, ozone and a bunch of other toxic stuff. It's a pitty we cannot use this engine, even if MIT gets it at some point. I may put it on my channel at some point because it certainly looks great when you see it (plasma is always amazing...)...
@ddegn
@ddegn 3 жыл бұрын
Any idea of what sort of thrust to power ratio you get? I'd think the high current requirement would make it impractical for airplanes. It would be great to see the device in action. I hope you make a video showing it off. I think a lot of people would want to see an airplane propelled by a plasma torch even if it's not a practical form of propulsion.
@BillDemos
@BillDemos 3 жыл бұрын
@@ddegn The high voltage is imractical. High amperage low voltage is safe and easy to make. Anyhow, haven't done any testing to see what the thrust to power ratio one gets, will have to at some point revisit this idea and make a video. :)
@ddegn
@ddegn 3 жыл бұрын
@@BillDemos I just subbed to your channel. I really hope you get around to making a video on your ion thruster.
@BillDemos
@BillDemos 3 жыл бұрын
@@ddegn Thanks so much! That really helps a new channel! I will try my best to come to this video shortly. For now I need to upload the final video on the CMOS series and then another on Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation so that the channel starts being also on material sciences. Hope you like the content that is coming. Best regards!
@antoniobragancamartins3165
@antoniobragancamartins3165 2 жыл бұрын
I have a plasma cutter, but plasma cutter uses pressurized air and it's that air that gives the thrust and not the plasma! On truth that air is already turned in plasma state but with the same molecular density from air! And the density that causes the thrust! Do you remember the rocket equation?
@Notrocketscience101
@Notrocketscience101 5 жыл бұрын
I remember reading about ion engines in grade school 50 years ago. Seems they haven’t come nearly as far as those books authors predicted. Reminds me of the nuclear fusion joke; it’s always 30 years away. (Yes, I’m aware they play a very small roll in satellites)
@larryfisher7056
@larryfisher7056 4 жыл бұрын
I believe that I read a Scientific American article about these drives in the 60s.
@mastershooter64
@mastershooter64 4 жыл бұрын
Ion engines don't play a "small" role in satellites An ion engine is the main engine in a space probe thats visiting asteroids ion engines are used in many places
@larryfisher7056
@larryfisher7056 4 жыл бұрын
Ethan, yeah I'm sure that was what I was rembering. A large high voltage power supply with a long cable. I was fascinated by the concept though and realized that an on board supply would be necessary to further the idea.
@KraussEMUS1
@KraussEMUS1 4 жыл бұрын
Hi @@mastershooter64 , I never said they play a small role, it must have been someone else. They are very important in space and will soon be commercially available for small lightweight drones, like the working rough prototypes on my channel.
@j6100
@j6100 4 жыл бұрын
If the military can weaponize it, itd a Only take a month for it jump ahead an entire century
@stevoplex
@stevoplex 4 жыл бұрын
No moving parts?! 😰
@alb9022
@alb9022 4 жыл бұрын
xD
@DavidSmith-sf4rl
@DavidSmith-sf4rl 4 жыл бұрын
Darn details don't you know.
@kev3d
@kev3d 4 жыл бұрын
No, you must remain motionless. Forever.
@StixFerryMan
@StixFerryMan 4 жыл бұрын
You don’t think airlines won’t get rid of reclining seats eventually? Hell some airlines are talking about removing seats totally. :P
@slader-hl1kk
@slader-hl1kk 4 жыл бұрын
That would suck cant even relax
@nwovee
@nwovee 4 жыл бұрын
2018: The Plane With No Moving Parts 2028: The Plane With No Cabin Or Wings
@steelwasp9375
@steelwasp9375 4 жыл бұрын
Yeah, why use wings if you can use directional thrusters.
@howmuchbeforechamp
@howmuchbeforechamp 4 жыл бұрын
2030 The iplane you pay 3000 usd to drive somewhere
@livethefuture2492
@livethefuture2492 4 жыл бұрын
You mean a quadcopter?
@steelwasp9375
@steelwasp9375 3 жыл бұрын
@AKUJIRULE yeah that's right, no luck there without breakthrough propulsion technology
@yuvtube1
@yuvtube1 3 жыл бұрын
@@steelwasp9375 ya, sit on a rocket instead.
@Vaaaaadim
@Vaaaaadim 3 жыл бұрын
3:49 "Here on earth it has a completely different set of challenges, Here on earth planes pose a completely different challenge"
@dag_of_the_west5416
@dag_of_the_west5416 3 жыл бұрын
Yes, on earth you have an unlimited source of propellant known as the atmosphere.
@Vaaaaadim
@Vaaaaadim 3 жыл бұрын
@@dag_of_the_west5416 what I was pointing out was that it was two takes/versions of the same line, both left in.
@haramboy6932
@haramboy6932 5 жыл бұрын
8:27 That SleeK hand Shake THO
@nix207
@nix207 5 жыл бұрын
FlawlessOldie was looking for this comment. I knew someone would notice that too
@ericdeming522
@ericdeming522 4 жыл бұрын
Looks to me like they just launched it off a winch or slingshot and it glided across the room.
@JustinY.
@JustinY. 5 жыл бұрын
I see you've been playing Kerbal Space Program.
@USSAnimeNCC-
@USSAnimeNCC- 5 жыл бұрын
Remember check your staging
@maverickf1426
@maverickf1426 5 жыл бұрын
TIE FIGHTERS CONFIRMED!
@KBow
@KBow 5 жыл бұрын
Holy shit, it's you again!!
@TheSilentCartgraph3r
@TheSilentCartgraph3r 5 жыл бұрын
Definitely KZfaq employees on shifts that run this “Justin Y” thing
@eat_ze_bugs
@eat_ze_bugs 5 жыл бұрын
Do you ever leave the house?
@Z_question
@Z_question 4 жыл бұрын
What happens when you put a negative Ion generator into the atmosphere? I somehow think you will have more energy than expected. It will find you lightning fast.
@doggo6517
@doggo6517 2 жыл бұрын
At first I didn't see the pun - then it struck me.
@Bentleytalksaboutstuff
@Bentleytalksaboutstuff Ай бұрын
@@doggo6517 I am so shocked by the pun too.
@skootz24
@skootz24 4 жыл бұрын
That thing looks remarkably similar to some of those dawn of flight era designs
@kennethferland5579
@kennethferland5579 4 жыл бұрын
You missed one of the HIGHEST benefits of Xenon, low ionization energy. Low ionization energy means less of the total energy input is used ionizing and more is used for acceleration.
@johncauthorn498
@johncauthorn498 4 жыл бұрын
Kenneth Ferland yes I don’t understand why they used nitrogen instead on xenon
@imadmorsli2871
@imadmorsli2871 4 жыл бұрын
@@johncauthorn498 My guess is that as he said the benefit of this vs the one in space is that this one doesn't have to carry its own supply of atoms to ionize. Nitrogen is the most common element in the atmosphere so it would make sense for them to try to use that instead of having a supply of xenon on the plane
@w0ttheh3ll
@w0ttheh3ll 4 жыл бұрын
@@johncauthorn498 because there's no xenon in the surrounding air.
@Aristedes_Mr.Melody_TM
@Aristedes_Mr.Melody_TM 4 жыл бұрын
#Bwhahahaha
@Aristedes_Mr.Melody_TM
@Aristedes_Mr.Melody_TM 4 жыл бұрын
@@imadmorsli2871 If it worked at all....
@LostieTrekieTechie
@LostieTrekieTechie 5 жыл бұрын
Woo! Trying skill share to start the new year. Unfortunately, my life has moving parts, but we're giving it a go.
@HHalcyon
@HHalcyon 5 жыл бұрын
I tried skillshare - I stopped trying and wrote to them that I want my account deleted. Was actually thoroughly disappointed with their service. For something so well advertised I would expect something more functional. I can get my materials elsewhere right now.
@Derpuwolf
@Derpuwolf 5 жыл бұрын
Halcyon where is elsewhere? I want to research multiple viable options. Also, if you don't mind sharing, what were you disappointed about and felt lacking?
@halonothing1
@halonothing1 5 жыл бұрын
I found skillshare extremely disappointing. I got my account, then proceeded to spend nearly half an hour browsing topics. I didn't find a single thing which interested me, so I scrapped my account less than an hour later. It's just not useful for my needs. I'd rather use open course ware and the like. It's free and has real university lectures on every subject imaginable. Or if you want something more concise, there's Khan Academy.
@HHalcyon
@HHalcyon 5 жыл бұрын
@@Derpuwolf Basically what Nothing/ said. The exact same experience - just an unorganised stack of study stuff and much of it is actually average quality at best. That's the impression I got out of it so it's really hard to find legit good information there. I mean you could if you wanted to but it's definitely way below it's potential.
@HHalcyon
@HHalcyon 5 жыл бұрын
@Hmmm Private trackers will circumvent all of this anyway. Education shouldn't be behind paywalls. Even research papers are behind paywalls and for that there is Sci-hub. Knowledge is the only thing advancing us further as a civilization. Well somehow one's got to make a living in life so it's a weird conundrum overall.
@doapin6240
@doapin6240 4 жыл бұрын
Everybody gangsta until one of the plane’s parts starts moving
@nevernether3368
@nevernether3368 3 жыл бұрын
Your hands down my favorite channel. Keep up the amazing work.
@blueleader2187
@blueleader2187 5 жыл бұрын
TIE FIGHTERS ARE ALMOST APON US!!! Twin Ion Engine
@skylerher5993
@skylerher5993 5 жыл бұрын
Yes, then we can create a grand empire and conquer the galaxy!!
@jpowell180
@jpowell180 5 жыл бұрын
Ion propulsion has extremely low thrust - it could never do what the TIE fighters in the movies do.
@antonf.9278
@antonf.9278 5 жыл бұрын
It's not a fighter
@ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869
@ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869 5 жыл бұрын
If I could just get a light sabre.
@ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869
@ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869 5 жыл бұрын
@kavitha cm good point. Even a warping wing would have moving parts.
@mericaman6388
@mericaman6388 5 жыл бұрын
Paper airplanes: *am I a joke to you?*
@darkforcex7362
@darkforcex7362 5 жыл бұрын
It is a science for paper airplanes. I enjoy it.
@lieutenantsupascoop2126
@lieutenantsupascoop2126 4 жыл бұрын
Glider: am I a bigger joke??
@nethascotx24
@nethascotx24 4 жыл бұрын
Bruh moment
@alhassani626
@alhassani626 4 жыл бұрын
Emphasis on "powered flight".
@justanotherguy8706
@justanotherguy8706 4 жыл бұрын
gliders: am i a joke to you?
@fabianoalexandre1720
@fabianoalexandre1720 3 жыл бұрын
8:28 this dude in the left being ignored lol
@youtubeee4762
@youtubeee4762 3 жыл бұрын
Hahaha😂😂
@vidhutripathi5368
@vidhutripathi5368 3 жыл бұрын
@RealEngineering I take notes sometimes watching your videos😅. Great work as always. Cheers
@BobMcCoy
@BobMcCoy 5 жыл бұрын
*_Wendover Productions wants to know your location_*
@RealEngineering
@RealEngineering 5 жыл бұрын
I'll fight any man
@sebastianelytron8450
@sebastianelytron8450 5 жыл бұрын
If I read one more "wants to know your location" or "left the chat" comment I swear I will punch someone.
@mirzaahmed6589
@mirzaahmed6589 5 жыл бұрын
Dublin, Ireland.
@PrograError
@PrograError 5 жыл бұрын
@@sebastianelytron8450 *FBI wants to know your location*
@bluzter
@bluzter 5 жыл бұрын
@@sebastianelytron8450 Interpol also wants to know your location.
@allinsiteUK
@allinsiteUK 4 жыл бұрын
'Having no moving parts is a benefit that can not be overstated" is what he should have said.
@andrewfinlayson1507
@andrewfinlayson1507 Жыл бұрын
Correct....that was the point at which I lost interest.
@scottsilverman165
@scottsilverman165 4 жыл бұрын
This. This is how jet packs. I better be alive for mass produced, silent, affordable, jet packs Jetsons style.
@RKroese
@RKroese 4 жыл бұрын
Duhe duhe duhe duhe duhe duhe
@michaeltyborski4802
@michaeltyborski4802 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for producing excellent videos. You help bring excitement back to engineering.
@evaristegalois6282
@evaristegalois6282 5 жыл бұрын
RealLifeLore = Toyota Corolla Wendover Productions = Airplane Real Engineering = -Rockets- also airplanes?
@bananesalee7086
@bananesalee7086 5 жыл бұрын
i suggest you to unsubscribe to RealLifeLore, this guy tells too much cracks
@halonothing1
@halonothing1 5 жыл бұрын
What the hell is a "crack"?
@sallerc
@sallerc 5 жыл бұрын
Practical Engineering - Concrete
@noelbuckley1508
@noelbuckley1508 5 жыл бұрын
Na blueprints
@kolecava
@kolecava 5 жыл бұрын
Mustard is up there with Real Engineering & grandfather Kurtzegat.
@manganiaco
@manganiaco 4 жыл бұрын
"no moving parts" but... but ... but... that's the opposite direction to making Mechas...
@teamataraxia6244
@teamataraxia6244 4 жыл бұрын
Good lol
@jistorian9502
@jistorian9502 4 жыл бұрын
need a pilot with a good set of lungs. everyone knows mech power is coupled directly to how loudly pilots is screaming/flailing at the controls
@codyblea3638
@codyblea3638 4 жыл бұрын
@@jistorian9502 and the power level is directly proportional to the amount of the pilot's childhood friends are dead and or fighting them in their own mech.
@cmbaz1140
@cmbaz1140 4 жыл бұрын
I want my GUNDAM...
@blankundefeated9078
@blankundefeated9078 4 жыл бұрын
Not really. If you watch enough anime you could see they use ion wings to fly.
@yosvelquintero
@yosvelquintero 3 жыл бұрын
This Valuable Content Well Resumed in less than 10 mins is Priceless Thank you for Sharing
@ghettochungus1769
@ghettochungus1769 3 жыл бұрын
US ARMY : "Alright now how do we turn it into an ion bomb" 🤔
@Yeaggghurte
@Yeaggghurte 3 жыл бұрын
Hmm 🌚
@GravityBunk
@GravityBunk 3 жыл бұрын
If they haven’t weaponised it already.
@drained1177
@drained1177 3 жыл бұрын
Why tf would they do that when they've already made hundreds of nuclear weapons.
@neooblisk0084
@neooblisk0084 3 жыл бұрын
@@drained1177 why wouldn't we. Answer me that
@dogeth4021
@dogeth4021 3 жыл бұрын
You mean the human race, right?
@williams.813
@williams.813 5 жыл бұрын
When you have 1000000 patience in KSP
@flaviosalatino8192
@flaviosalatino8192 5 жыл бұрын
Or the betterwarp mod installed like others do, so you can travel in the atmosphere or do burns at 30-50 times the normal speed
@user-qy9pj6sy8g
@user-qy9pj6sy8g 5 жыл бұрын
Weekly Market Review 30 November 2018 During the week ending November 30, global stock indices showed a predominantly positive trend. ASIAN-PACIFIC AREA e-fin.top
@cavemacken6510
@cavemacken6510 5 жыл бұрын
@@user-qy9pj6sy8g Bot! Or just (extremely) misplaced advertising, but I feel like calling you a bot.
@jadegecko
@jadegecko 5 жыл бұрын
Always thought EHD aircraft were a neat idea, but it's really amazing to see them becoming something more than a novelty. ...On that note, it'd be neat to see a short on variable-buoyancy propulsion, and the submersible vehicles (e.g. Slocum Thermal) and aircraft (UK's Phoenix drone) that use it.
@user-xb6fl9ri6g
@user-xb6fl9ri6g 4 жыл бұрын
I'm working on a design with only 1 moving part (related to the propulsion), and research led me here, very cool thank you for sharing
@Sanscripter
@Sanscripter Жыл бұрын
Did you finish it?
@saiyedulcreation
@saiyedulcreation 4 жыл бұрын
Amazing bro and sweetest tone
@TheSilentCartgraph3r
@TheSilentCartgraph3r 5 жыл бұрын
What is your view on nuclear fission power on a global scale? I think we should build more modern designed reactors. Or even thorium molten salt reactors.
@KuraIthys
@KuraIthys 5 жыл бұрын
Uranium and plutonium reactors are not making use of a renewable resource (at least, not in isolation) so given our current problems I don't think it does much for us long term. Thorium reactors can be made to regenerate the fuel used, so that may have more merit. It's an open question whether it's worth the effort though. Nuclear power is expensive. VERY expensive. Meanwhile, the cost of solar and wind power is has been dropping exponentially over many years and shows no signs of stopping. Battery prices are also dropping fairly rapidly, which is great for static storage applications. (energy density of batteries has not improved anywhere near as much, hence why electric aircraft are problematic - since typical fuels currently used still have something like 300 times the effective energy density per unit mass.)
@unintentionallydramatic
@unintentionallydramatic 5 жыл бұрын
Molten Salt Reactors are the only model we can A) Cool consistently enough and B) Miniaturize enough while maintaining effective shielding. Our main problem is that we've been building reactors far too big, which makes them vastly more expensive to service and doesn't incentivise shutdown or complete overhaul. What we need are fission reactors for individual cities not entire states.
@squeakybunny2776
@squeakybunny2776 5 жыл бұрын
@@KuraIthys sure...but the power output of windmills an solar panels compared to the area they take up (their power density) is quite pathetic...
@unintentionallydramatic
@unintentionallydramatic 5 жыл бұрын
@@KuraIthys Battery energy density is nowhere near the level where it can be deployed as effectively as we need. It's just not on the table yet and we're going to need a solution to bridge extended gaps once it does either way. MSR + Solar + Geothermal + Battery + Biogas + Compressed Air Energy Storage + Pumped Hydro Storage is the ideal mix to pursue. It's not something to be dogmatic about. Breadth of options beats a singular approach.
@duser
@duser 5 жыл бұрын
I think solar panels are a much better way to go, supplemented with geothermal, hydroelectric, and wind energy in compatible areas. I'd just stick solar panels to every surface exposed to the sun. However, storing the energy is something else. Nuclear power, I feel, is sort of underdeveloped due to the stigma behind nuclear. We need better reactor designs, fast. Or we need more fuel, but this option only opens up when we get something like asteroid mining.
@imranahmadov2463
@imranahmadov2463 5 жыл бұрын
But steel is heavier than feathers.
@greenthizzle4
@greenthizzle4 5 жыл бұрын
Imran Ahmadov so what's heavier, a pound of steel or a pound of feathers?
@caedenv2575
@caedenv2575 5 жыл бұрын
@@greenthizzle4 ha it's a trick the feathers are heavier
@caedenv2575
@caedenv2575 5 жыл бұрын
@@obamaprism114 nope the feather are heavier you need more to make the same weight and more means heavier
@greenthizzle4
@greenthizzle4 5 жыл бұрын
caeden V volume does not equal weight
@greenthizzle4
@greenthizzle4 5 жыл бұрын
Dave Tin can I think they're trolling
@KraussEMUS1
@KraussEMUS1 Жыл бұрын
There are about 40 videos of the first and only solely ion propelled aircrafts that specifically are patented for having onboard power on my channel (since 2014). They are capable of VTOL flight for up to about 2 minutes and are tremendously more efficient. They were patented in 2014, and widely published and verified, for lifting their power supplies against Earth's gravity.
@avechristusrex31
@avechristusrex31 4 жыл бұрын
Great channel. Most informative and inspiring!
@keegan773
@keegan773 4 жыл бұрын
When an ion engine can carry a person as far as the Wright brothers flew on their first flight I will sit up and take notice, but it's a start.
@KraussEMUS1
@KraussEMUS1 4 жыл бұрын
If you click on the channel icon to the left, you can see one that predates the MIT one with an onboard power supply. That is the start.
@WinterCharmVT
@WinterCharmVT 4 жыл бұрын
Everything starts somewhere, dude. The first steam engine was a ball with two pipes in it and a fire underneath. Look how far steam engines went. Same with the first gasoline engines, electric motors, and now the first ion engine. We'll look back on this moment and say "I was there when they first made these!"
@Aristedes_Mr.Melody_TM
@Aristedes_Mr.Melody_TM 4 жыл бұрын
@@WinterCharmVT 60 years ago and they still don't work.
@yvonnevevo6788
@yvonnevevo6788 4 жыл бұрын
The government has tr3b flying triangles, and force us to stay in the technological equivalent of the Stone age with this garbage.
@maxieprimo2758
@maxieprimo2758 4 жыл бұрын
"I'm not impressed by this revolutionary application of physics, tell me when it can benefit me"
@HORRIOR1
@HORRIOR1 5 жыл бұрын
"The Plane With No Moving Parts", so how do you get inside it?
@michaelhall9138
@michaelhall9138 5 жыл бұрын
HORRIOR: Or control it!
@Johny40Se7en
@Johny40Se7en 5 жыл бұрын
A nano wall like on the Doom film - kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gs6jYJmW05O8e2Q.html ; )
@kensmith5694
@kensmith5694 5 жыл бұрын
The door could always be open so it doesn't move.
@kensmith5694
@kensmith5694 5 жыл бұрын
@@michaelhall9138 Control would be easier than you think. Split the electrostatic stuff so that each wing has its own thrust. Increase the total thrust to climb and make one wing have more than the other to turn. With resonant power supplies (like used here) the voltage can be varied while keeping the thing efficient.
@FactoryofRedstone
@FactoryofRedstone 5 жыл бұрын
@@michaelhall9138 A touch pad
@patrickrose1221
@patrickrose1221 3 жыл бұрын
This is so exciting , this is just the beginning. The progression of this is going to take people's breath away , along with the simple rather than the complicated : )
@billdale1
@billdale1 4 жыл бұрын
"It will never lead to anything viable"... spoke I, 110 years ago, as I watched the silly Wrights toy with their useless aeroplane!!!
@washablejunk281
@washablejunk281 5 жыл бұрын
I remember this from the 90s where people made floating triangles
@ZeroFPV
@ZeroFPV 5 жыл бұрын
Jepp. It's called Biefeld-Brown effect and was patented in the 1960s.
@ZeroFPV
@ZeroFPV 5 жыл бұрын
It even was on Mythbusters... kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i6mZiJxn17Cun6M.html
@matsv201
@matsv201 5 жыл бұрын
Well... That is not quite the same... But it's still no moving parts... And it's waaay more efficient.
@Flyguy779
@Flyguy779 5 жыл бұрын
science channels : masters of sponsorship segways
@unvergebeneid
@unvergebeneid 5 жыл бұрын
*segues
@esatd34
@esatd34 5 жыл бұрын
Skillant... They love em
@stefano2069
@stefano2069 4 жыл бұрын
Great. Very clear and no music bothering. :-)
@mushrifsaidin
@mushrifsaidin 4 жыл бұрын
I wonder if you could optimize the core ion drive structure using AI. Build it from the ground up and optimizing every aspect of it like the air gap and voltage needed to produce the optimal thrust and overcome drag enough for a sustained lift. Could produce a cool hover board like green goblin.
@MusikCassette
@MusikCassette 5 жыл бұрын
your major mistake is to think of this in terms of improvement on existing applications. instead you shoould think abaout new applications that can be achived by this technic
@emilyvanmoslfak2295
@emilyvanmoslfak2295 4 жыл бұрын
When the nitrogen is ionised, does it react with the oxygen in the air and does the plane leave a trail of nitric acid vapor behind?
@zaphenath6756
@zaphenath6756 4 жыл бұрын
hopefully yes
@wojciechmuras553
@wojciechmuras553 4 жыл бұрын
MIT is working on real-life Chemtrails!
@BillDemos
@BillDemos 3 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately yes. I have made an atmospheric plasma drive of 2KW based on plasma cutter principles. The problem is what you mentioned. So even if MIT get's it and gets beyond the mW range they are in, they will come face to face with this unfortunate fact...
@evanherk
@evanherk 3 жыл бұрын
and ozone, probably.
@jurajvariny6034
@jurajvariny6034 2 жыл бұрын
Probably depends on energy level of the ions. There are home ionisers which are carefully tuned to avoid generating ozone or nitric oxides. I have one, it also makes slight breeze without moving parts.
@jennerjacob91
@jennerjacob91 4 жыл бұрын
that was a terrific segue!
@Phocas666
@Phocas666 2 жыл бұрын
Segue skills on point
@General5USA
@General5USA 4 жыл бұрын
This propulsion system was comprised in 1967 on STAR TREK series and a working prototype engine created in 1979. with lithium battery and pulse generator. Look out here comes the Enterprise.😀light speed ...no problem!
@RamLaska
@RamLaska 5 жыл бұрын
Art Bell did a levitating ion drive "drone" years ago. It takes a metric crapton of electricity, and it produces a crapton of ozone. This may be a greatly refined version of that, but I'm still very skeptical.
@RamLaska
@RamLaska 5 жыл бұрын
Yeah, people see the words "solid state" or "ion drive" and lose their minds 😆 It's just a mega-upscaled ionic breeze air freshener. We had one at home and all it really did was pull dust out of the air. I went to a restaurant once that had an industrial "air purifier" (ozone generator with fan). I felt absolutely nauseous.
@wmm771
@wmm771 5 жыл бұрын
I think we got a way to solve the ozone layer problem
@HB-et5iv
@HB-et5iv 5 жыл бұрын
Not only ozone. It will create even bigger amounts of NOx. Unhealthy in every way.
@RamLaska
@RamLaska 5 жыл бұрын
@@HB-et5iv Good to know!
@wmm771
@wmm771 5 жыл бұрын
@@HB-et5iv shit
@luanmai8351
@luanmai8351 Жыл бұрын
I like the way you make the airfoil asymmetric
@henrycullen950
@henrycullen950 3 жыл бұрын
You sound like a hybrid of DCU Mecatronics and Trinity Theoretical Physics. The vid is great, keep it up!!
@itaieiron7275
@itaieiron7275 4 жыл бұрын
Could this be used to keep air passing over a stalling wing going smoothly without much power or drag, allowing for higher angles of attack?
@sadboye1272
@sadboye1272 4 жыл бұрын
vruh Harvard is looking for you
@powderslinger5968
@powderslinger5968 4 жыл бұрын
hmmmmmmmmm.....Possibly!
@funkmonkeyfun
@funkmonkeyfun 4 жыл бұрын
The ion wind produced by this is not actual wind or air flow so no, it cant.
@dsdy1205
@dsdy1205 3 жыл бұрын
It could, but VGs require no power
@user-nf9xc7ww7m
@user-nf9xc7ww7m 2 жыл бұрын
Ionocraft: we don't need wings.
@erik6690
@erik6690 5 жыл бұрын
Don't usually comment on videos unless I have a lot of respect for the creator and think I can help the community. I'm an aerospace engineer currently working on manned EVOTL. What you said about power required scaling as the square of mass is not correct and the equation at 7:36 is misleading and taken out of context. I'm not commenting to flame mental superiority, it's just that you're removing interest a technology that will soon greatly improve the world by telling your 1.5M subscribers that electric aviation doesn't scale when the truth is that is scales really well.
@KraussEMUS1
@KraussEMUS1 5 жыл бұрын
Please see the patented "Self Contained Ion Powered Aircraft" www.electronairllc.org@Wet Johnny
@KraussEMUS1
@KraussEMUS1 5 жыл бұрын
I was teaching but now only work at electronairllc.org @@carlstovermusic
@KraussEMUS1
@KraussEMUS1 5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for standing up for the tech! If you don't already know? there is an earlier ion propelled aircraft with onboard power. If you click on the purple icon to the left, you can see some rough prototypes in flight.
@wlhgmk
@wlhgmk 3 жыл бұрын
Battery motors are going to be great for gliders and powered hang gliders in which you only want to get up into the thermals and/or get yourself out of a tight situation when you have misjudged the wind currents.
@awkb777
@awkb777 2 ай бұрын
this is the greatest explanation i have seen
@joenock3466
@joenock3466 4 жыл бұрын
I love the comment, no moving parts, I want to move my seat, we need more humor in our lives, good job
@FirstArchon
@FirstArchon 5 жыл бұрын
so expect ion planes 30 years after commercial fusion, self driving cars, the manned mission to Europa and quantum computing in desktops?
@fernandoecamp4462
@fernandoecamp4462 4 жыл бұрын
self driving cars... are already here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bq5lp81_ztPTcqc.html
@Aristedes_Mr.Melody_TM
@Aristedes_Mr.Melody_TM 4 жыл бұрын
basically except for self driving crashmobiles. NEVER. Ok #COLDFUSION.
@internziko
@internziko 4 жыл бұрын
Seems legit
@wojciechmuras553
@wojciechmuras553 4 жыл бұрын
Self-driving cars? Checked. Quantum desktops? Kinda... You can request quantum computing time through IBM cloud, including from your PC. Fusion power? 69% ready. Literally, that's the Q value of the JET reactor. Just give it few more years, it'll get to 100%. Mission to Europa? That's a tad more difficult than the rest of your milestones, but we're working on it one step at a time. For now - we're building a Moon base. In 5-10 years, when we have an outpost there, then we'll think about Mars, Europa and everything beyond. Ion planes sound absurd, but maybe they have a future?
@garyz777
@garyz777 2 жыл бұрын
I love the Wright brother's analogy with this latest tech. Yes isn't a big leap over other ion drives but still in it's infancy. The future looks bright!
@KraussEMUS1
@KraussEMUS1 2 жыл бұрын
Samuel Langley is the only fair analogy. Since MIT did not make the first one with onboard power and they are being promoted as such anyway.
@jigold22571
@jigold22571 3 жыл бұрын
Absolutely Fabulous 💯
@playwithme1982
@playwithme1982 4 жыл бұрын
me: ohhhhhhhhhhhhh, so that's how they do it mom later: so what did you learn on the computer? me: uhhhhhhhh
@uttaradit2
@uttaradit2 4 жыл бұрын
'who knows where we'll be in 100 years time?' -I do - dead.
@aaa-vx8ke
@aaa-vx8ke 4 жыл бұрын
It said we as in humanity not you
@mylesjohnston8759
@mylesjohnston8759 4 жыл бұрын
-14 subscribers with no videos He’s still right. If things don’t change. We as in humanity will be dead.
@livethefuture2492
@livethefuture2492 4 жыл бұрын
Well historically as medical technology advances people live longer, perhaps this century it may be common for people to live 100 years.
@humbugswangkerton9972
@humbugswangkerton9972 4 жыл бұрын
I love the engineering mindset: get excited, explore the possibilities, then swiftly shit on it for all its issues....good, keep staying hopeful but grounded in reality. Cheers from another engineer
@DL-kc8fc
@DL-kc8fc 4 жыл бұрын
In the last century we called it "lifter" and we built it out of skewers, wire and aluminum foil. The model started vertically. The power source was a TV high-voltage transformer (30-50kV) and a rectifier (there is an error in the video because it cannot work on AC). This home ion engine with an area of about 1m2 raised the egg. Horizontal flight was impossible because the model was tethered because of external power supply with two-wire high-voltage power supply.
@KraussEMUS1
@KraussEMUS1 4 жыл бұрын
Please click on the channel icon on the left to see 12 videos of an ion propelled aircraft that does have onboard power. Please see the NPR news program about it and video with officials present as well, Thanks. It can also rise vertically!
@DL-kc8fc
@DL-kc8fc 4 жыл бұрын
@@KraussEMUS1 Obviously you didn't understand, or the google translator misrepresented it. I have been experimenting with this type of "propulsion" in the last century and have tried it in a vacuum chamber. Since there were no portable high-voltage power supplies, the model had to be restrained and therefore only started upright. This only shows that this is an old idea and I was irritated by the fatal inaccuracies in the video.
@KraussEMUS1
@KraussEMUS1 4 жыл бұрын
@@DL-kc8fc Dear Boleslav, I was just writing about ion propelled crafts with onboard power(flies through the air carrying its power supply.) There is really only one that uses solely ion propulsion, not MIT's, excluding lighter than air crafts. I wasn't sure if you had seen the crafts that I built on my channel. They all have onboard power! Anyone that uses the improvements I have found, should be able to get a much improved thrust to weight ratio. Thanks for replying!
@DL-kc8fc
@DL-kc8fc 4 жыл бұрын
@@KraussEMUS1 Now we probably understand each other. I will definitely look at your next work (currently I cannot watch videos).
@KraussEMUS1
@KraussEMUS1 4 жыл бұрын
@@DL-kc8fc Perhaps you could try a different computer or different programming?
@halonothing1
@halonothing1 5 жыл бұрын
4:40 So it's just an h bridge and a few cockroft walton voltage multipliers. Hardly cutting edge. This stuff's been around for decades.
@AttilaAsztalos
@AttilaAsztalos 5 жыл бұрын
The only novelty is actually constructing it with modern, light enough components and battery that it can be actually carried aloft by the engine it powers. But that sounds a heck of lot less impressive so yay PR...
@kensmith5694
@kensmith5694 5 жыл бұрын
Look more carefully at the multipliers and see that they have twice the diodes of a Cockroft-Walton design. It is not a good design.
@halonothing1
@halonothing1 5 жыл бұрын
You don't seem to understand energy density and seem to be ignoring what the video said about how the weight icreases disproportionately to the lift you can produce. They're not going to make anything commercially viable that runs on lipo batteries. This stuff's been around since the 60's. If it were practical, somebody would have done it.
@rimpelsteeltje
@rimpelsteeltje 5 жыл бұрын
Gotta try this in KSP
@rumahhafidzahbekasi1354
@rumahhafidzahbekasi1354 5 жыл бұрын
Ion engine in kerbal space program is 2 kilo newton.
@charimuvilla8693
@charimuvilla8693 5 жыл бұрын
I don't think ions work in the atmosphere anymore
@kadirmansuri3105
@kadirmansuri3105 2 жыл бұрын
Japanese were also conducting ion engine research since long back. How much have they succeeded is no known. Thanks for this clip.
@C134B
@C134B 4 жыл бұрын
Loved the video.
@stephenchong7645
@stephenchong7645 5 жыл бұрын
Dear Real Engineering, may i ask how you guys are so up to date with the latest technology, is there any particular website or because of relationship with top researchers. Thank you so much and have a nice day
@PP-ky2ji
@PP-ky2ji 5 жыл бұрын
The internet. Dude how old are you.
@TrentTationnaiseXization
@TrentTationnaiseXization 4 жыл бұрын
Idk what is more impressive. Xenon fueled propulsion or A.I. engineered geometry. Wouldn't mind dabbling in either subject.
@a.ielimba78
@a.ielimba78 3 жыл бұрын
It sounds like polarized haul's of ships like star trek, in which various energy signiture's could be promoted on such haul's. This would allow intake and out take of energy ions. This would allow possible communication signiture's and shielding potential off the haul to be emitted. It's neat that electric propelled planes move, in a earth atmosphere. With the right tuning, it could possibly move it through other environment's like outer space. This would allow a vessel, or object to thrust movement entirely all at once from a polarized haul. Or entirely all at once, to have communication signal's emitted from the whole polarized haul. This in theory, should also work for nano bot's as well, as they could mimic that feature of polarized haul's. Nano bot's could move around and through environment's. As they thrust, or hover through environment's. Also if nano bot's emitted the right energy signiture's, or signal's. They could be detected from devices and communication with them from other devices would be possible. Cloaking would be possible as well, for those polarized haul's. As they could be blending in microwaves and other possible background noises, to have it appear normal. The only thing really, is to have polarized haul's charged well enough. For strong energy field dynamics of interaction's to be in the environment. Everything is like torus Field's, or alternating current fluctuation's. I like another name for this, force balance.
@jacobkirstein6352
@jacobkirstein6352 2 жыл бұрын
I love this video thank you
@BloodyRainRang
@BloodyRainRang 5 жыл бұрын
Having played hundreds of hours of Kerbal Space Program, I know how hard it can be to make an ion plane. The difference being, I can't even manage that in KSP, and here these guys did in in real life where the rules of (and problems with) it are literally on a different magnitude o_o
@Notrocketscience101
@Notrocketscience101 5 жыл бұрын
BloodyRain2k I’m skeptical it really flys. Seems more like it glides a bit further than no power.
@Erowens98
@Erowens98 5 жыл бұрын
To be fair this is a bit different to the ion drives in ksp. Same principal, different execution.
@fidziek
@fidziek 4 жыл бұрын
not at all - here it's only a projection of imagination, not any accurate nor precission account of what is really possible to build and use NOW! (not mention our very limited knowledge about space, mass and time, as well as so called 'cosmic vacuum' properties... And Cosmic Space as a whole... so, we can as well laugh all together - we are dreamers! Well, well, well...
@Aristedes_Mr.Melody_TM
@Aristedes_Mr.Melody_TM 4 жыл бұрын
@@fidziek Love that #TESLAroadster in Orbit. NOT.
@KraussEMUS1
@KraussEMUS1 5 жыл бұрын
The first heavier than air ion propelled aircraft of any kind to carry its power supply has already been flown long before the MIT craft... The earlier ion propelled aircraft can lift its complete onboard power supply vertically from the ground for about 2 minutes.... You can see the 5 public videos of the patented invention in flight, by clicking on the purple channel icon to the left.
@KraussEMUS1
@KraussEMUS1 3 жыл бұрын
Please note, there is a much earlier patented ion propelled aircraft with onboard power. If you're interested, please google US Patent 10,119,527 for more details. This earlier series of aircrafts can fly vertically or horizontally with their onboard power supplies for about 2 minutes.
@markwilding3828
@markwilding3828 4 жыл бұрын
overstated
@KraussEMUS1
@KraussEMUS1 4 жыл бұрын
US Patent Number 10,119,527. Please see it fly with onboard power using only ion propulsion before the MIT version.
@delwyngomes4640
@delwyngomes4640 3 жыл бұрын
You're a genius!
@KraussEMUS1
@KraussEMUS1 3 жыл бұрын
@@delwyngomes4640 Thanks Delwyn, I think I'm just an enthusiast that put a lot of time into it. It's mainly just focusing on one thing and keeping at it. There are still lots of exciting improvements to come if we are lucky. Best regards:).
@garymcaleer6112
@garymcaleer6112 4 жыл бұрын
Amazing engineering! This shows that there are Edison, Tesla, and Einstein intellects in our generation.
@luongmaihunggia
@luongmaihunggia 3 жыл бұрын
Edison was a liar and an asshole Einstein was an asshole to his wife
@archiecoolsdown5854
@archiecoolsdown5854 3 жыл бұрын
@@luongmaihunggia everyone who made a difference with science was those things.
@luongmaihunggia
@luongmaihunggia 3 жыл бұрын
@@archiecoolsdown5854 being a genius does not justify being an asshole.
@jethrowbowdeen
@jethrowbowdeen 2 жыл бұрын
One day people will except that we mastered Electro gravitics in the late 40's.
@Vkonto
@Vkonto 4 жыл бұрын
Great content ..Where do you get your stock footage from and what tools you use to make videos. Could you please provide some pointers?
@LazyOtaku
@LazyOtaku 4 жыл бұрын
I can't wait until we can combine ion propulsion with a kind of railgun mass driver to launch sky jumper ships that could reach low orbit. Lok
@BillDemos
@BillDemos 3 жыл бұрын
Most efficient way is to use a hydrogen ballon, not a rail gun. And then, yes, ion propulsion...
@denelson83
@denelson83 4 жыл бұрын
"No moving parts"…? Dude, the _whole plane_ moves.
@niravjhaveri
@niravjhaveri 4 жыл бұрын
The 'parts' don't
@fajrulramdhan2005
@fajrulramdhan2005 4 жыл бұрын
Depending on whose perspective. People on board the plane would say claim the ground and everything else moves
@mr.windowcleangrow8794
@mr.windowcleangrow8794 4 жыл бұрын
Hahahahahaha you are also right my friend hahahahaha
@mr.windowcleangrow8794
@mr.windowcleangrow8794 4 жыл бұрын
@@niravjhaveri ya we all know that already after watching the same video you watched.... Hahahaha
@CapnSurvivalist
@CapnSurvivalist 4 жыл бұрын
@@niravjhaveri r/whooosh
@johnb8854
@johnb8854 4 жыл бұрын
I saw this in the 1960's, in a "Popular Mechanics" magazine... I made one (Model Plane) myself in the same year... Humans can't cross Galaxies in Minutes, but you can by accessing "The Processing System of LIFE", and use the Technologies available, through "The Processing System of LIFE", involving Programming...
@970357ers
@970357ers 6 ай бұрын
It appears to me as a layperson, we are in the 'propellor' phase of ionic thurst. When the 'jet/turbo' phase arrives, it will be transformative.
@RealEngineering
@RealEngineering 5 жыл бұрын
Wendover Productions is playing at some T-Series shenanigans and trying to overtake me in Instagram followers. Can't let him win. instagram.com/brianjamesmcmanus/
@TheSilentCartgraph3r
@TheSilentCartgraph3r 5 жыл бұрын
Real Engineering nuclear reactors are good
@iTzCharmander
@iTzCharmander 5 жыл бұрын
MIT is a wizard college, got it.
@tireiron5546
@tireiron5546 5 жыл бұрын
Real Engineering just saying every propulsion system will have moving parts. It’s called *Throttle*
@sam2314
@sam2314 5 жыл бұрын
RazorRidge Actually, volt regulation can be done with non moving electrical components and digital systems
@blameyourself4489
@blameyourself4489 5 жыл бұрын
Real engineering. I don't see how you get to these values. If you take a Trent 1000 engine, your power consumption is 540 W/N or 1,8 N per kW. I don't see how you get 50 N per kW for a helicopter. Could you please show me your calculations?
@glenn6704
@glenn6704 5 жыл бұрын
Much better technology will be out soon. I just need to work on my flux capacitor.
@hyouzanren1846
@hyouzanren1846 4 жыл бұрын
This is a dream planes for high/mid dense populated area!
@EnlightenedSavage
@EnlightenedSavage 3 жыл бұрын
I've always wanted to build one of these
@eswarapparajasekhar4594
@eswarapparajasekhar4594 4 жыл бұрын
It's old technology, its already mentioned in indian Book of The Aerodynamics "Vimana Shashtra". Description of More than 500 types planes with 500 varieties means 2,50,000 types planes. More Research is needed to have gravity free planes or space crafts.
@Julian-zh1nj
@Julian-zh1nj 5 жыл бұрын
7:51 isn´t the v in the drag formula squarded ?
@kensmith5694
@kensmith5694 5 жыл бұрын
Yes for drag force. It is cubed for power. If the air was more viscous, there would be a linear component to drag force.
@jordanhildebrandt3705
@jordanhildebrandt3705 2 жыл бұрын
Nice meta-segue at the end there
@muhammetaydogmus4404
@muhammetaydogmus4404 Жыл бұрын
0:57 in sophisticated warfare, aircrafts are spotted 10s of kilometers away with radar technology. Stealth aircrafts main focus is to be shaped in a way that radar is less effective, sound factor is very miniscule.
@michaelhamar3305
@michaelhamar3305 5 жыл бұрын
That technology will be very unfull on Titan or other planets with high atmospheric density!
@imnotvladimirputin
@imnotvladimirputin 3 жыл бұрын
"a plane with no moving parts" Me, an intellectual: Paper airplane.
@toasterhavingabath6980
@toasterhavingabath6980 2 жыл бұрын
GLIDER
@imnotvladimirputin
@imnotvladimirputin 2 жыл бұрын
@@toasterhavingabath6980 how turn?
@godblessamerica7048
@godblessamerica7048 Жыл бұрын
My grandfather was born before the first flight and he flew once on a 747. He saw the birth of cars, radio, telephone, refrigerators, electricity, television, CDs, movies, color film, and going to the moon. Also indoor plumbing. Amazing when you think about it.
@binyamdemissie9123
@binyamdemissie9123 3 жыл бұрын
That's so crazy!!
Can Nuclear Propulsion Take Us to Mars?
21:45
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 4,5 МЛН
The Insane Engineering of the Thunderscreech
19:27
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 3,6 МЛН
Joven bailarín noquea a ladrón de un golpe #nmas #shorts
00:17
ОДИН ДОМА #shorts
00:34
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
어른의 힘으로만 할 수 있는 버블티 마시는법
00:15
진영민yeongmin
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
Когда на улице Маябрь 😈 #марьяна #шортс
00:17
Designing A Self Propelling Ionic Thrust Wing
16:30
Plasma Channel
Рет қаралды 4,2 МЛН
How NASA Reinvented The Wheel - Shape Memory Alloys
9:23
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
How Many ERRORS Can You Fit in a Video?!
20:40
ElectroBOOM
Рет қаралды 567 М.
Designing a Futuristic Magnetic Turbine (MHD drive)
11:48
Plasma Channel
Рет қаралды 978 М.
The Truth about Hydrogen
14:58
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
The Insane Engineering of the A-10 Warthog
16:27
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
The Insane Engineering of the Parker Solar Probe
19:54
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 3,5 МЛН
The INSANE Largest Aircraft Ever Designed - Lockheed CL-1201
15:24
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 887 М.
Building A Twin Ion Engine (TIE) Catamaran (ft RCTestFlight)
18:40
Plasma Channel
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
The Insane Engineering of the X-15
31:30
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Добавления ключа в домофон ДомРу
0:18
XL-Power Best For Audio Call 📞 Mobile 📱
0:42
Tech Official
Рет қаралды 771 М.
Я Создал Новый Айфон!
0:59
FLV
Рет қаралды 4,6 МЛН
How much charging is in your phone right now? 📱➡️ 🔋VS 🪫
0:11
ПК с Авито за 3000р
0:58
ЖЕЛЕЗНЫЙ КОРОЛЬ
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН