What's your point? To whom you are accusing of limiting Allah? Whom, you are attacking? why don't you support, back up your claim by quotiing Quran, Sahih hadiths? without proof, evidence, dalil from the Quran, sahih hadiths, your accusation is worthless, no value.

The comment i made is clear crystal clear have u watch this video ??? Are u a sunni?? Smh wake up rewatvh the video and listen to whats being said instead of acting foolish and ignorant like a johnny come lately to the party

just comment the following comment I am sending you

🔴 When Imaam Abu Haneefah (Rahimahullah) was asked of his opinion of the one who says i do not know whether Allaah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) is above the heavens or on the earth, Imaam Abu Haneefah (Rahimahullah) said: He has disbelieved, because Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) says: “The Most Merciful rose above the Throne”, and His Throne is above His (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) seven heavens. He was then asked, what if he said that Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) is above His (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) Throne but he does not know whether the Throne is in the heavens or on the earth he said, he has disbelieved. because he has denied that He (subhaanahu wa ta’aala) is above the heavens [Quoted in Al-Uluww of Adh»Dhahabi, also in Sharh Aqeedah At»Tahawiyyah of Ibn Abi AI-lzz AI»Hanafi] 🔴 lmaam Malik (Rahimahullah) said when replying to the one who asked, ‘How did Allah make lstawaa? (Ascension above the Throne), Al-lstawaa is Known, and its how is unknown, to have faith in it is obligatory, and to question it is an innovation.” Then he said to the questioner, “i do not think except that you are an innovator” and he ordered him to be expelled. [Quoted in AI-Asmaa was Sifaat’ Page #.516] 🔴 Imaam Ash-Shafi’ee (Rahimahullah) said: The belief that I am upon, and I saw Our Companions, the Ashab-ul- Hadith (People of hadith) - like Imaam Malik and Sufvan and others - to be upon is: Affirming the testimony that none has the right to be worshipped except Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) and that Muhammad (Sal-Allahu ‘alayhe wa sallam) is the Messenger of Allah. And that Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) is above His Throne. above His heaven. He comes close to His creation howsoever He Wills, and He (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) Descends to the lowest heaven howsoever He Wills. [Quoted in ‘Awn aI-Ma’bood’ (13/41), and ibn Abu Ya’la reports it in ‘Tabaqaat aI»Hanaabilaa‘ (1/283) with a chain of narration linked back to lmaam Ash-Shafi’ee.) Imaam Ash-Shafi’ee (Rahimahullah) said on another occasion: “To Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) belong Names and Attributes that occur in His Book and His Prophet informed to the nation. It is not possible for anyone to refute (radd) them. So the one who contradicts this after the evidence has been established against him then he is a kafir (disbeliever), and as for before the establishment of the proof then he is excused due to ignorance, because the knowledge of that cannot be attained through the intellect. So we affirm these Attributes and we negate tashbeeh (likening Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) to creation) as Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) negated it by saying, ‘there is nothing like Him.”‘ [Quoted in ‘Siyar A’Iaam an-Nubalaa’ (10/80)] 🔴 lmaam Ahmad (Rahimahullah) was asked: “Allah is above the seventh heaven, above His Throne. distinct from his creation, and His Power and Knowledge are in every place?” He (Rahimahullah) replied: Yes. above the Throne and His Knowledge is in every place (Quoted in Sharh Usool ilal‘tiqaad].

He should respond to the discussion invitation given by Br. Ehsan

Yes they are all opposing salaf and/or desperate pathetic attempts to refute scholars. just comment the following comment:

🔴 When Imaam Abu Haneefah (Rahimahullah) was asked of his opinion of the one who says i do not know whether Allaah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) is above the heavens or on the earth, Imaam Abu Haneefah (Rahimahullah) said: He has disbelieved, because Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) says: “The Most Merciful rose above the Throne”, and His Throne is above His (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) seven heavens. He was then asked, what if he said that Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) is above His (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) Throne but he does not know whether the Throne is in the heavens or on the earth he said, he has disbelieved. because he has denied that He (subhaanahu wa ta’aala) is above the heavens [Quoted in Al-Uluww of Adh»Dhahabi, also in Sharh Aqeedah At»Tahawiyyah of Ibn Abi AI-lzz AI»Hanafi] 🔴 lmaam Malik (Rahimahullah) said when replying to the one who asked, ‘How did Allah make lstawaa? (Ascension above the Throne), Al-lstawaa is Known, and its how is unknown, to have faith in it is obligatory, and to question it is an innovation.” Then he said to the questioner, “i do not think except that you are an innovator” and he ordered him to be expelled. [Quoted in AI-Asmaa was Sifaat’ Page #.516] 🔴 Imaam Ash-Shafi’ee (Rahimahullah) said: The belief that I am upon, and I saw Our Companions, the Ashab-ul- Hadith (People of hadith) - like Imaam Malik and Sufvan and others - to be upon is: Affirming the testimony that none has the right to be worshipped except Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) and that Muhammad (Sal-Allahu ‘alayhe wa sallam) is the Messenger of Allah. And that Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) is above His Throne. above His heaven. He comes close to His creation howsoever He Wills, and He (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) Descends to the lowest heaven howsoever He Wills. [Quoted in ‘Awn aI-Ma’bood’ (13/41), and ibn Abu Ya’la reports it in ‘Tabaqaat aI»Hanaabilaa‘ (1/283) with a chain of narration linked back to lmaam Ash-Shafi’ee.) Imaam Ash-Shafi’ee (Rahimahullah) said on another occasion: “To Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) belong Names and Attributes that occur in His Book and His Prophet informed to the nation. It is not possible for anyone to refute (radd) them. So the one who contradicts this after the evidence has been established against him then he is a kafir (disbeliever), and as for before the establishment of the proof then he is excused due to ignorance, because the knowledge of that cannot be attained through the intellect. So we affirm these Attributes and we negate tashbeeh (likening Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) to creation) as Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) negated it by saying, ‘there is nothing like Him.”‘ [Quoted in ‘Siyar A’Iaam an-Nubalaa’ (10/80)] 🔴 lmaam Ahmad (Rahimahullah) was asked: “Allah is above the seventh heaven, above His Throne. distinct from his creation, and His Power and Knowledge are in every place?” He (Rahimahullah) replied: Yes. above the Throne and His Knowledge is in every place (Quoted in Sharh Usool ilal‘tiqaad].

Bro Hajji admitted that he first learnt Islam from deobandis in pakistan and in the uk. And since Mohammed Yasir is one of the heads of the deobandis in the uk, it’s very possible that Bro Hajji studied under that guy directly.

@@ibmsulaymani yea i remember him saying he got his studys from Darul uloom which are all Deobandi institutes here aswell birmingham bradford leeds etc

@@marsx2 not all deobandi scholars believe in tafweedh in meaning. Many major scholars accept the aqeeda of salaf within names and attributes of Allah.

@@osamamanan2723 if not all beleive this then why are those "some" still deobandis why do they still associate with that group i dont understand bro.

@@marsx2 deoband was actually a school or darul uloom. Whoever passed through that darul uloom in india is called deobandi. They associate to one group is because their teachers were common. Deobandis are predominantly hanafies and some are Shafehi. They can follow any creed school since they dont do taqleed in aqeeda so many of them adopted some aspects of Athari creed however they still passed from Darul Uloom deoband India.

Mufti Tariq affirms the Uluw

Lol get your facts right mate. Go ask him yourself

​@@AbuAbdullahAlHanbaliis Tariq Masood a wahabi?

Some of them agreed with salaf ie the athari and even admitted it is safer.

Akhi do you have a statement which says Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi believed in Tawfid Al Kayfiyyah? جَزَاكَ ٱللَّٰهُ خَيْرًا‎

may Allah be pleased with ibn Rajab. we learn from him because he only conveyed the teachings that was passed down from the 3 best generation .

I doesn’t read but I feel it will make sense.

@@everygoodisinwhatthesalafb7613 I agree we follow what has an isnad, my point is he can't teach something new that the salaf didn't already establish!

I watch all channels to see who gives references and it seems he does give a lot of references. let's keep our mind open and not be narrow minded.

@@thecuriousservant5549 Yasir read half the references.... he needs to read his own schloars tafsir... Ashraf Ali Thanvi wrote in his “Taqrir Tirmidhi” in the chapter of “Bab Ma Ja fi fadl Sadaqah” p 187 and after, Idarah Talifat Ashrafiyah: “Maulana Sahib (Rahmatullah Aleyhi) said that many people of knowledge say that these Ahadith should be taken upon their apparent (Zahir) meaning, it will be said that Allah (Ta’ala) possesses a hand, a foot , an eye and an ear, He possesses all these things but we are not aware of their Kayfiyah (how they are). Like God has no similarity and like his essence (Zat) cannot be comprehended as it is, in the same manner it is impossible to comprehend His attributes, and this was the Madhab of the Salaf us Salihin and previous scholars (Mutaqaddimun) and the Jahmiyah, which is an Islamic sect, performs tawil (extrapolation) of all of these matters, for instance they say that in the verse “The hand of Allah is above their hands”, hand means power. Late scholars (Mutaakhir) chose the Madhab of these innovators, and this because of a particular need, as it was resembling the Christians… Ahlus Sunnat nowadays chose Tanzih (purification), meaning Haqq (Ta’ala) is free from space and time, and the Sufis nowadays say that neither Allah is purified in all ways neither resembling in all ways, but all of this is true. Maulana said that is someone asked himself in his heart: where did these Sufis invent this Barzakh? Either Allah (Ta’ala)’s hand and food will be similar (to that of creation) or they won’t exist, then one should reply in his heart that our hands and feet and others are Majazi (metaphorical) and those of Haqq (Ta’ala) are real (Haqiqi), like He is God, in the same way His hand and foot will be. End of His Taqrir Comment: The people Ashraf Ali Thanvi tells to be Ahlus Sunnah are in fact Ash’aris and Maturidis and they are not from Ahlus Sunnah as they opposed the Madhab of the Salaf and choose the extrapolations of the Jahmiyah. Also Thanvi told us that Madhab of Sufis is different from the people of Kalam, as for them Allah can have a foot and hand different from creation.

@@thecuriousservant5549 Shah Walliyullah wrote in his “Hujjatullah Al-Balighah”: “Without exception all of the heavenly religions agree that the Divine Attributes should be explained in this way, and that these expressions should be applied according to their proper meaning, and that nothing more should be discussed about them beyond this usage. In this way the upright generations (close to the time of the Prophet) passed away, then a group of Muslims became engrossed in discussing the Attributes, and in investigating their meanings without a revealed textual basis and without conclusive, demonstrative proof. The Prophet, may the peace and blessings of God be upon him, said “Speculate about the creation, not about (the nature of) the Creator,” and he interpreted God’s, may He be Exalted, saying, “Your Lord, He is the utmost limit,” (53 : 42) by “there should be no speculation about the Lord.”‘ The Divine Attributes are not created, temporally originated things, and speculating about them lies in asking “How is God qualified by them?” and therefore this is speculation about the Creator. Al-Tirmidhi- said concerning the hadith “The hand of God is full,”‘ that the religious leaders had said concerning this hadith that they believed it as it was given without interpreting or making conjectures about it. Likewise, more than one Imam, among them Sufyan al-Thauri,’ Malik ibn Anas, Ibn ‘Uyayna,’ and Ibn al-Mubarak,” said that these things have been transmitted (in the hadith) and they believed them, and there was no scope for asking “how.” On another occasion he (Tirmidhi) said, “The application of these attributes, as they are, is not anthropomorphism. Rather it is anthropomorphism to say, ‘Hearing is (literally) hearing (like our hearing) and seeing is (literally) seeing.”… I hold that there is no difference among hearing, seeing, having power, laughing, speaking, and sitting; for regular speakers of the language understand these in a fashion inappropriate to the Holy. Is there any inconsistency in laughing except that it requires a mouth, and likewise so does speech? Is there any incompatibility in falling and descending other than that they require a hand and a leg? And likewise seeing and hearing require eyes and ears, and God knows better. These speculators behaved contemptuously toward the People of the Hadith calling them corporealists and anthropomorphists and saying that they sought refuge in the formula of “without asking how” (bi la kaif). It has become eminently clear to me that this contempt of theirs is unfounded and that they err in their sayings both from the viewpoint of tradition and of reason and that they err in slandering the leaders of the true religion. … There is in the Holy Enclave an order which they desire to establish among mankind, so that if people are in conformity with it (the order) they will be joined to the Highest Council and are taken out of the darkness into the light of God and His bounty, and they are given joy in their souls and other humans and the angels are inspired to treat them well. If they oppose it (the order), they remain separate from the Highest Council and are struck by their (the Council’s) hatred and punished in a way that has been mentioned above. Therefore it must necessarily be said that God is “pleased” and “gives a reward of thanks,” or is “angered” and “bestows curses;” all (of this), derives from the running of the universe according to the requirement of the beneficial purpose (al-maslaha). Sometimes the creation of the thing which is prayed for turns out to be part of the order of the universe, and this is called “the answering of prayer.” Since “vision,” according to our usage, is the disclosure of what is seen in the most perfect way; and since people, when they are transported to certain states which they had been promised at the Resurrection, will attain the theophany” which stands in the center of the World of Images, so that all of them will see Him with their eyes;” it is necessary to say that, “you will see Him as you see the full moon,” and God knows better.” End of Shah Waliyullah’s words. Comment: So Shah Waliyullah refuted the people of Kalam who attacked Ahlul Hadithd declaring them to be antropormorphists because they established the attributes without asking how (Kayfiyah). Also Shah Waliyullah also said that the believers will see Allah with their eyes.

@@Spark12429 Not sure if you knew, but he was a great sufi himself.

@@stradegy3338 Not sure if you knew, Ahmed raza khan said he was influenced by Imam MIAW and called his children wahhabis

😂

You clearly don't have a view of the reality

Lol I don't think anything mentions Allah having heads. You follow Abu Hanifa? Did youbread Fiqhul Akbar? Learn to read first and stop spinning and rocking back and forth too much.