@@Muslim-87 After the Ottomans found out what was going on in the Arabian peninsula, they sent an army lead by Ibrahim Pasha and massacred the scholars of najd and sold their women in the Egyptian slave markets. Even Bro Hajji and Dilly Hussein admitted this. The Ottomans were grave worshipping sufis whilst the scholars of najd were fighting for tawheed. Of course they were gonna clash at some point.

@@Muslim-87 Abdurrahman Al Jabarti is an Egyptian historian who lived who during the time that this happened, he talks about the women from najd who were kidnapped and sold in the slave markets of Cairo. He discusses this in his book عجائب الآثار في التراجم والأخبار.

@@Muslim-87 The name of the book is عجائب الآثار في التراجم والأخبار

@@ibmsulaymani thanks for this reply, so why did the Ottomans send a army if Saud and co did not rebel?

@@kasper52173 Because they saw the Dawah of tawheed as a threat

_Obey rulers!_ including those *elected through Liberal Democratic System, govern by Secular Laws?* 🙄

_Obey rulers!_ including those *elected through Liberal Democratic System, govern by Secular Laws?* 🙄

He invited salafi brothers on to this podcast he said none of them responded

capitalize A in Allah my younger brother. May Allah guide him or disable him and his dawa. Amin!

@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 ameen

@@scoobydo4528 if I feel like it.

Perhaps it's hot seat podcast episode about "obeying the rulers" , it's about 11 hours long plus another 2-3 hour additional vde o

You're mixing up two 3 hadith into one. Abu Huraira reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Years of treachery will come over people in which liars are believed and the truthful are denied, the deceitful are trusted and the trustworthy are considered traitors, and the disgraceful will deliver speeches.” It was said, “Who are the disgraceful?” The Prophet said, “Petty men with authority over the common people.” Source: Sunan Ibn Mājah 4036 Abdullah ibn Amr reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, Allah does not withhold knowledge by snatching it away from his servants, but rather he withholds knowledge by taking the souls of scholars, until no scholar remains and people follow ignorant leaders. They are asked and they issue judgments without knowledge. Thus, they are astray and lead others astray.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 100, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 2673 The last hadith is reference of the Quranists and those that reject the sunnah Al-Miqdam ibn Ma’di reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “I have surely been given the Quran and something like it along with it. Soon the time is come when a man will recline on his couch, saying: Only follow the Quran, make lawful what you find in it as lawful and outlaw what you find in it as unlawful.” Source: Sunan Abī Dāwūd 4604

@@IbrahimKhalil-bt9yh Jazakh’Allah khayr

@@sajidmahmood4238 wa iyyak ya akhi

@@IbrahimKhalil-bt9yh plz explian the last one i do not under stand it, what does he mean something like that long with it.

@@mohammedkhan2303 the sunnah

These countries you mentioned live worst than the Slaves of the ancient Egypt

@@Noxcho-li8pn Living under tyrants like Bashar al-Assad, no wonder

Was this grave worship and praying to dead people a state-sponsored practice?

@@idrea43 Yes, and many among their sultans took part in such practices too

@@fedpostah Dang Where were the scholars

this is not him i think the brother in the video has his own channel

Stop the cap, go study islam and learn what khurooj is. The Ottomans brutally murdered Najdis for years. The Ottomans attacked the Najd state first. And you coming up with scenarios that don't make any sense and even bring racism in it. Its always the ignorant fool who speak like children. The Saudi rulers never were interested in wealth, they were interested in Islaam and spreading Islaam and warning against Shirk. And the Ottoman state didn't like that and labeled the Saudi state as Khawarij while they were the bloodshedders

Ibn Abdul Wahhab was in najd, he never even conquered medina in his lifetime. The Ottomans didn’t control najd, during the lifetime of Ibn Abdul Wahhab.

Wrong ottomans only had control superficially. Yes the najd areas fell under their banner but they had no control there. Historically najd area was ruled by local rulers.

@@no_doubt the sahabahs killed people, the ottomans killed people, people kill people what are you saying?

@@no_doubt Instead of going to these deviant websites how about you go open the book and read it

@@roneddy No not even under their banner, Nejd was independent

@---- The Saudi Kingdom never declared themselves as a Caliphate.

So if all the caliphates are illegitimate than that would mean Salahuddin shouldn’t have liberated Jerusalem or the Islamic expansion into Spain and constantople shouldn’t have happen if the qurasyh weren’t spear heading. Is that a valid opinion?

dont the shia say this that the ruler has to be from the fam of the messenger

It was not khuruj, please watch the video. If you’ve already watched it, watch it again.

Brother they didn't say anything regarding the next generations and followers of Muhammad bin Abdul wahab who attacked other part of Arabs which were in the control of Ottoman. "With the aid of the Ikhwan, Ibn Saud captured al-Hasa from the Ottomans in 1913." Source :Mohamed Zayyan Aljazairi (1968). "Diplomatic history of Saudi Arabia, 1903-1960's" (PDF). University of Arizona. p. 26. Retrieved 29 November 2020. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_Arabia#/media/File:Arabia_1914.png ..

@@Believer99999 Yes they captured Ottoman territory, that’s not khuruj, that’s war.

@@beinghuman185 Generally because they are stateless criminals, 2 they slander against leaders.

@@warrior7730 to know an Islamic gov, learn what's Islam or a Muslim. A man with exceeding white clothes and black hair came to the Prophet peace and blessings on him and said what is Islam? And the 5 pillars were mentioned - Shahadatain, 5 salat, Fasting in Ramadan, Zakat and Hajj! - This guides the Community! Then was asked what is Iman/faith? - 6 pillars were mentioned, Beleif in Allah, His Angels, His Books, His Prophet/Messengers, The Last Day and the Qadr or Divine Decree. - This guides the individual. Then was asked what is Ihsan? - It is to worship Allah knowing He sees you as though you see him. Then is goes into the signs of the last day, though not mentioned in this hadith its the kawarij being with dajjal - and the kawarij will be refuted here - In sha Allah. ~~~ An Islamic state is run by a Muslim, Who upholds 5 pillars of Islam and 6 pillars of Iman which is in a way linked to the first pillar of Islam. proof: Ibn Umar said to Qadriya your deeds won't be accepted. Taf. Ibn Kathir says Ibn Abbas on Qur'an 5 :44 - if you affirm the law and then error even on desire, it is fisq or minor disbelief. 2 sign of Second pillar is calling of the Athan, - If the Athan was heard the Sahabas Radiyallahu anhum would not invade. This matches the hadith don't fight your rulers as long as they pray. Narrated Humaid: Anas bin Malik said, "Whenever the Prophet (ﷺ peace and blessings on him) went out with us to fight (in Allah's cause) against any nation, he never allowed us to attack till morning and he would wait and see: if he heard Adhan he would postpone the attack and if he did not hear Adhan he would attack them. "Anas added, "We reached Khaibar at night and in the morning when he did not hear the Adhan... he said, "Allahu-Akbar! Allahu-Akbar! Khaibar is ruined. Whenever we approach a (hostile) nation (to fight), then evil will be the morning of those who have been warned." Sahih al-Bukhari 610, Call to Prayers (Adhaan) ... So in this sense this is the Minimum outwardly. The rest is Ihsan and corrected by Dawa! 3 Zakat was collected, Yes Abu Bakr fought the people who withheld Zakat however among some of them was Musailimah al Dajjal and was Zakat given personally during Uthman Radiyallahu anhu's time? 4 Fasting is a special act of worship with Allah that one does personally. 5 Hajj is only done in Saudiyah. We Advice the rulers and aid them differently then the common folk in hadith : The Prophet (ﷺ peace and blessings be upon him) said, “The deen (religion) is naseehah (advice, sincerity). “To Allah, His Book, His Messenger, and to the leaders of the Muslims and their common folk.” - 40 Hadith Nawawi [Muslim] There are the 5 protected pillars in Shariah - Din, Life, Mind, Family and Wealth. ~~~ For a judge, if ijtihad is correct its 2 rewards, if he is wrong he gets one reward. - so after affirming the law, if they error they still get a reward, so its not an Aqida issue... Allah rewards those who strive. 2 common doubts they use. A1) Deals with non Muslims rulers B1) Using customs of people. Answers A2) Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him did make deals with non Muslims like Hudaibiyah or in Medina, Qur'an 8 :72 etc. B2) Customs if they don't oppose other aspects of shari'a are ok and even apart of basic fiqh. Example in divorce customs is used for some of the payments... - so are the kawarij going to say marriage is not apart of Islamic law - when marriage is half our din? This shows how colosally ignorant the kawarij are! ~~~ Sum : Islam gov. is by a Muslim holding to 6 pillars of Iman, affirms sharia in whole as Iman in Qur'an, incl. deals of rulers (hudaibiya) & customs (nika), ruling errors don't negate Iman (Ibn Abbas Q 5 :44), & call to salat via Athan is minimum via salaf! Rest is "Ihsan" in a sense or prefection corrected by dawa and not kawarij bida sin fighting. There is ijma (Muhajir & Ansar / Qur'an 9 :100) not to rebel against a Muslim ruler, even if they take over. Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم said: You should listen to and obey your ruler even if he was a Ethiopian (slave)....... and Hadith continues. - Bukhari 7142 and it’s a ijma (consensus) to not rebel against Muslim ruler.

@@Muslim-87 go listen to hizbut tahrir's dawah and arguments they make, they use the same kalam. And his boy dilly is connected with people from hizbut tahrir. I don't have a link for you on stand by right now though

@@Muslim-87 go ask hajji about his stance on HT

@@Muslim-87 oh you follow him you say, maybe a week ago your boy dilly had a sufi, ikhwani and HT member on his podcast. I don't even follow these guys but I'm more aware of their circle of deviants than you are. May Allah wake you up

@UChch72lz6aAuiD0oherbG-Q by the way akhi your playlists with women's ASMR seem haram... Allahul musta'an

@UChch72lz6aAuiD0oherbG-Q by the way akhi your playlists with women's ASMR seem haram... Allahul musta'an

I use to think the same too until i realize thats how our knowledge is preserved

Abdul Wahab Means the slave of Wahab Similar to Abdullah, His name is not Wahab,

_Obey rulers!_ including those *elected through Liberal Democratic System, govern by Secular Laws?* 🙄

Ibn Abdul Wahhab never fought the Ottomans, the wars between the najdi dawah and the Ottoman Empire took place after his death. Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab didn’t rebel against the Ottoman Empire because he was never under the Ottoman Empire. Najd was ruled by many different Arab tribes and Mohammed Ibn Saud was the governor of his own land. Mohammed Ibn Saud fighting the Ottomans wasn’t khuruj, it was two states going to war with each other. But of course misguided callers like Bro Hajji and Yasir Qadhi will continue to spread their lies.

@@ibmsulaymani so now you are saying you are allowed to speak out against the Muslim rulers as long as you don’t live in there control lands.did ibn abdulwahhab speak out against a Muslim ruler(the ottomans) and encouraged a rebellion in the lands of which they ruled ? Regardless inside or outside of nagd. Also denying this would mean if a group came out from Yemen to overthrow the Saudi rulers due to there transgression it is permissible. Answer these questions with honesty. When it comes to speaking out against Muslim rulers you guys do the most. IBN abdulwahhab went as far as making takfir on them whilst they was still ruling now that also means u cannot fault a man for speaking out against the Saudi regime or Qatari or anywhere else as long as u don’t live there

@@Gufaaco Show us where he encouraged rebellion, the rulers he spoke against were rulers that he didn’t consider to be muslim anyway.

@@ibmsulaymani so now your saying if I consider a Muslim Ruler as kafir it’s no more khuruj? Bro, when it’s proven that the ruler is MUSLIM then it is khuruuj regardless of his opinion.The majority of scholars agreed they was Muslim. What are you talking about bro ? You can’t argue on this matter you will sound stupid

@@Gufaaco It wasn’t khuruj since he wasn’t under them, his baya was to Mohammed Ibn Saud and no one else. Even a 5 year old can understand this akhi, stop arguing for such a ridiculous point.