Please expand your understanding of the word "attenuate" and the change to the NO mass from the TLM? My little bit of research explains: Is a action verb Attenuate 1. reduce the force, effect, or value of. Similar words: weakened reduced lessened decreased diminished impaired enervated Opposite words: strengthened 2. reduce in thickness; make thin. adjective reduced in force, effect, or physical thickness. "the doctrines of Christianity became very attenuate and distorted" To the ordinary Catholic man or woman that clearly indicates a disimprovement. Why is Pope Francis promoting a dismproved NO Mass? That is the $64,000 question that seems to be dividing the Catholic Church. It dilutes Christian unity and promotes disunity. Not good?

It is always good to address a priest by his surname. I'm not telling you off. God bless

Thank you for sharing our videos!! God bless you

Please check out the FSSP. At age 73, having served the True Mass of the Ages for years before the NO was pushed on us, I know that you will not be disappointed with the FSSP. If you’re in Fort Worth, join us at St. Benedict Parish. Hope to see you there soon.

Keep hope even in a hallway the Holy Mass can be said WW2 and rock Mass was said in times of necessity, your still at Mass and Our Blessed Lord knows your heart but honestly it will get harder, but the Truth is coming out Stay Catholic friends

Francis is a gift. He is being used by God to wake up many stuck in the Novus Ordo. God bless you.

FSSP is being closing monitored by the Vatican. Both FSSP & ICKSP have been rather quiet about the FS EDICT and the St. Patrick's Cathedral debacle just a few days ago

Your only talking about the Mass while the real crisis is the whole system of Vatican II. Whoever belongs to this system belongs to the false religion of NWO that St. Pius X warned us about. A chapel who has a picture of Bergolio, that chapel and its members belongs to the precursor of the Enemy of Christ. The priests in that chapel connect with the manifest heretic and apostate by celebrating una cum Mass (together with Francis or united with the enemy of Christ) and it most displeases God. This attacks the 1st Commandment of God wherein forbids attendance at false worship, whether Novus Ordo or una cum Mass. Bergolio's neo paganism practice of idolatry (Paca Mama), it means you approve of it so you sin against true religion.Another sin against 1st Commandment is that you are tempting God in justifying to be R&R (recognize and resist), a sin against the teaching of primacy of Papacy (to be with the Pope 100% or not to be with him because of just a single heresy), you chose to be with your false pope so go with him with all his heresies, and together with him, anathema (go back to St. Paul's teaching and you will be saved). Those who will be saved are those attending una cum Masses and who belongs to sedevantism/sedeprivationism. They are the true Roman Catholics who is defending the Church of Christ. They do not compromise the Faith and why were they excommunicated by Lefebvre? Because they refused to celebrate 1962 Mass of John XXIII, they refused the New Holy Week of Bugnini, etc. Lefebvre compromised the Mass (with una cum Canon) but, this is good news that I've learned, during his illness and last stage of his life, LEFEBVRE TOLD HIS CONFESSOR THAT HIS MASSES were celebrated in non una cum, not mentioning John Paul II in Canon. But he did not have a courage to recant his errors. Hope he saved his soul for his few last Masses did not commit sacrilege to God.

I too am a convert to TLM and can’t make myself go to N O.

Communion in the N.O. Mass is not inferior or something to feel guilty about. Its a heavenly gift

The fact that you cant recieve communion in a valid mass confirmed by the Catholic Church makes you sound, without a doubt schismatic. Repent and i'll pray for you.

​@Time2see01 I suggest that in addition to viewing Fatima Center videos, which have been reliably orthodox, you also view Fr. Hewko's masses and sermons. He speaks about this topic quite frequently. He is also on KZfaq. It is time well spent. 🙏🙏🙏

The post Vatican II mass is always refered to in the Latin term "Novus Ordo" by those (modernists) who attend it, even though they reject the Latin for the mass itself. The term in English is "new order", which is the term modernists should use if not understanding Latin is their problem with the traditional mass. Liturgy is based on belief, creating a new liturgy creates a new belief, a new belief coupled with the new liturgy, creates a new religion.

May I ask which area in general are you from?

You may have to travel now and then but the TLM is available in many places. Even if you can not have it every week, I hope you will get to it when you can.

Thank you for your comment. To find a traditional Mass near you, please see the directories published by the SSPX and the Ecclesia Dei groups: sspx.org/en/mass-locator fssp.com/locations/ www.latinmassdir.org/

Perhaps an eastern rite church is in your city if TLM isn't available (Ukrainian, ruthenian, byzantine, etc ) or Ordinariate

Lux Vera web site.

Thank you for sharing! May God bless you!

Byzantine Catholic, and any of the 20+++ Liturgical Rites/Catholic Churches are valid for your sacraments and daily Sunday obligation.

Is wrong!

Definitely wrong! The purification of the sacred vessels is an important part of the Mass and must be performed by the priest or deacon. The congregation must remain on their knees in adoration because Christ is still present on the altar until after the purification.

Run from there!

Before you leave nail your theses to the door requesting no EM, no hand communion, consecrated hands only+

I’ve learned one of the best prayers said twice is the introit prayer and the Old Canon will change you, in the New Mass I think you hear the Canon 2-3 times a year maybe? Idk

Thank you for the suggestion!

Read Online the Apostolic Constitution QUO PRIMUM of POPE SAINT PIUS FIFTH and Session 7 Canon 13 of Council of TRENT Dogmatic teaching of TRENT. Also Online "Open Letter to Confused Catholics."

Christ answered this when He walked the Earth "No man can serve two masters".

Yes it's valid, despite the dliuted prayers. It has all the barebones to be valid.

Because the NO Mass does not have an Offertory that states the intention of the celebrant to do as the Church has always done which is to to confect the Sacrament and change the bread and wine into the Body and Blood of our Lord, the celebrant has to intend to change the bread and wine into the Body and Blood of our Lord, or it does not happen. The NO Mass can be doubtful. If you are not certain that the intention of the celebrant is to change the bread and wine into the Body and Blood of our Lord, you should avoid. There are many well meaning NO Priests who mean well and wish to confect the Sacrament, but there are some who are malformed and who’s intent is questionable and therefore be avoided.

@@miracles_metanoia Anne Katherine Emmerich prophesied otherwise. Around the year 1820 she wrote regarding vatican 2 and the novus ordo: “I saw again the new and odd-looking Church which they were trying to build. There was nothing holy about it… People were kneading bread in the crypt below… but it would not rise, nor did they receive the body of Our Lord, but only bread. Those who were in error, through no fault of their own, and who piously and ardently longed for the Body of Jesus were spiritually consoled, but not by their communion. Then, my Guide [Jesus] said: ‘THIS IS BABEL.’ [The Mass in many languages].”

Thank you for your interest in this presentation by Father Kallio. We would recommend a catechism as a good starting point for the basics about the Church's teachings on Holy Mass. God bless you. ia800700.us.archive.org/23/items/BALTIMORECATECHISM/BALTIMORE_CATECHISM.pdf

SSPX never give a clear simple direct easy to understand answer. "Let your yes be yes,your no be no."

Thank you for your question. No Pope has any right or authority to change what Our Lord Himself has established in His Church. The power of binding and loosing refers to the authority given to the Pope to govern the Church; the "whatsoever" reference is therefore not so broad as one might at first think, since it cannot exceed the limits of that authority. And as regards the Pope's power and commission to teach, he has no authority whatsoever to alter in any way, add to, or subtract from the teachings and commandments of Christ. Our Lord said clearly: "Going therefore, teach ye all nations ... teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you." (Matt. 28:19 20) In other words, the Pope is the guardian, not the creator or arbiter, of Christian doctrine. As explained by the First Vatican Council, Our Lord established Peter and his successors as the supreme pastors of all the faithful, and promised the assistance of the Holy Ghost in fulfilling the duties of their office, "not so that they might, by His revelation, make known some new doctrine, but that, by His assistance, they might religiously guard and faithfully expound the revelation or Deposit of Faith transmitted by the Apostles." Likewise are all the faithful, including the Pope, bound to the Church's traditional rites of worship. For which reason the Council of Trent declared: "If anyone says that the received and approved rites of the Catholic Church customarily used in the solemn administration of the sacraments may be despised, or may be freely omitted by the ministers without sin, or may be CHANGED INTO OTHER NEW RITES BY ANY CHURCH PASTOR WHOMSOEVER, let him be anathema." (Session VII, Canon 13, Dz. 856) Thus it is impossible that any New Rite could be validly imposed upon the Church as if it were true Catholic worship, and we dare not turn to illegitimate rites lest we make ourselves guilty of the crime of false worship, forbidden by the First Commandment. God bless you.

Amazing answer! Thank you for your clarity❤

Thank you for your question which we will submit for reply in our Ask Father video series. In the meantime, we note that the Church's tradition has been formed according to its recognition of what the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is, rather than according to the circumstances of its institution. For instance, it would be ill-fitting to make each Mass the sequel to an evening meal. God bless you.

Thank you for your question. We believe Father's use of the term "renewal" to be correct. "Representation" (in the sense of re-presenting, presenting again) is another properly used term. The erroneous term which you may have in mind is "repetition." Our Lord's Sacrifice is not repeated. He died once, never to die again: "Knowing that Christ rising again from the dead, dieth now no more, death shall no more have dominion over Him. For in that He died to sin, he died once; but in that he liveth, he liveth unto God" (Romans 6:9-10); "Because Christ also died once for our sins, the just for the unjust" (1 Peter 3:18). God bless you.

It is worst than yesterday. Totally mute today. The eviil forces definitely do not want us to hear this podcast

I was so happy when I saw it posted again. Big disappointment!

The sound is fine here. I am listening to Father's message right now.

​@@weemouse1959. So am I now.😊

Wow…I never realized the importance of a stone altar vs a wood altar. We have been robbed of our heritage. Bless us Father and please make us worthy to receive that which was taken away. Make this available to all Catholics.

Thank you for your question. We are essentially a North American entity. Yes, we urge the faithful to assist exclusively at the traditional rite of Holy Mass. God bless you.

No. Read "Quo Primum Tempore" written by Saint Pope Pius V.

Read the 2 missals and you'll see for sure the new one vs the old and watch a Latin mass to NO mass the difference is night and day but the old missal has all the prayers and such that were removed

Thank you for your interest in this presentation. The "Short Critical Study of the New Order of Mass" presented to Pope Paul VI by Cardinal Ottaviani, then Prefect of the Holy Office, and others in 1969 might be of interest to you. The Study contained a cover letter signed by Cardinals Ottaviani and Bacci, which warned that the Novus Ordo, "represents both as a whole, and in its details, a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass as it was formulated in Session 22 of the Council of Trent." Often referred to as "The Ottaviani Intervention," this document readily can be found both in print and at many online sites. The link below seems to offer the best formatting for ease of reading on a screen. sspx.org/en/ottaviani-intervention

Thank you for your question. The tonsure, emblematic of the crown of thorns, is one of the many ways in which monks live in imitation of the perfections of Our Lord. God bless you.

You need to read about JPII's visits to Germany. Right away he wanted to lift the excommunication of Martin Luther! A few German bishops stopped him.

Wojtyla was a Modernist and violated the First Commandment with gusto for the whole world to see on numerous occasions. @@Eight-PointedStars

You say "reflects one." Which is exactly as it's the new religion. What? Are you in denial mode?

​@@purplescapular4935 I agree that the Novus Ordo is for a new religion. But Catholicism, the true religion, Catholicism predated the Novus Ordo because Bugnini's committee invented the Novus Ordo in the 1969's. Remember the difference between a religion and a tool people use when they practice that religion. That distinction seems clear to me. So I suspect someone left out a word when he typed the video title.

English martyrs refused to attend valid Masses by priests who sided with Protestants. The Eucharist was still the Eucharist. But hey, I guess you know better than the martyrs.

@@samuelwalker1410valid masses you say.

That’s a false equivalency anyway but please explain why any catholic should abstain from a valid mass?

@@GringoXavier how is that a false equivalency?

@@GringoXavier "Valid Masses you say." Yes, the Eucharist was actually confected...that's what validity means.

It is the Ape of the True Church

@jimjuly6587 It is indeed a new and false religion inspired by satan just as Archbishop Sheen described in 1948: "He [Satan] will set up a counter church which will be the ape of the Church, because he, the Devil, is the ape of God. It will have all the notes and characteristics of the Church, but in reverse and emptied of its divine content. It will be a mystical body of the Antichrist that will in all externals resemble the mystical body of Christ. . . .But the twentieth century will join the counter church because it claims to be infallible when its visible head speaks ex cathedra." (Fulton J. Sheen, Communism and the Conscience of the West, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1948, pp. 24-25)

@@carolynkimberly4021 I pity you and your lack of understanding

Wake up, and pray for wisdom. It is obvious for those who have eyes to see that the new Mass is Protestant and not Catholic. The errors of Vatican II are contradictory to what the Traditional Catholic faith has taught for over 1900 years before Vatican II and the new Mass. The new Mass does not signify the Sacrifice that it is supposed to be. Pray for eyes to see, but for the love of God, wake up and pray for the grace to see.

@@TS-ex4ql Well said! Many Catholic prophets and Our Blessed Mother herself gave us warnings prior to vatican 2 that SATAN - yes, the DEVIL would rule from Rome and would set up a false church. Did these prophets just say these things and make noise or these prophecies in error? Or, is there evidence that these things happened? Lets see... Enter - vatican 2 - a "novus ordo" new order "mass" is introduced by a "pope" who states that the smoke of satan has entered the sanctuary. This new "mass" is in reverse and stripped of its divine contents just as Archbishop Sheen predicted in 1948! Lenten fasting is nearly done away with, kneeling for communion is done away with, 70 percent of mass prayers are eliminated. Nearly all of the 7 sacraments are changed by Paul 6 just as prophesied. The very form of the sacred consecration is re-worded to accept "all". The list of evil and heretical updates is profound. The Catholic network is decimated with churches and schools closed by the thousands, nuns and priests leaving religious life in droves and "catholic divorce" exploding from single digits to multiple thousands per year. Vatican 2 "popes" approve of open violations of the 10 commandments and give public audience in Rome from a hall purposely designed to resemble a serpent and wherein sits a hideous statue of what they say is Christ rising from a nuclear explosion surrounded by death and skulls. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/e9ylZsp71Li2Zps.html Yes my friends, let him who has eyes to see , see and ears to hear, hear. Our eternal souls are at stake!