We forwarded this to Marty for him to get back to you.

@@CoolClubs Thanks for the help ... and if it's not clear I can send a pic highlighting the gap I'm referring to.

I have a set of i230 and the rear of the club is actually a plate, it moves slightly if you press it. As an engineer, (that means nothing really), I think it helps with sound and feel without the ball to jump off the face like in other makes of this type of construction. Basically, my opinion only, this club is actually a blade with a precise elastomer rear covered by the plate I've mentioned. It has a good peripheral weight distribution for good forgiveness and good consistency over the face.. I think ping have hit on something here, If the elastomer was tightly enclosed like other designs then the odd flyer or inconsistent hits would be a result due to compression. With this design, the elastomer is only doing the job it's intended to do resulting in consistent ball distance and flight.

@@CoolClubs Was Marty able to address or comment on this ?

@@simrandhawan9084 I have just sent this thread to Marty again.

No you did not hear him right they are 431

Hi Joe, Keep an eye out in early 2023 we will be releaseing all of the information you are looking for on our website and another partner website. This data is just the beginning!

@@CoolClubs Thank you!!

I've played the 225's and hit the P790...the i230 dont have the fliers the 790 produces. The 225s are solid, but the i230 is more consistent with dispersion as well as distance.

@@bryaningold8856 I think the 225's are a little more forgiving. They have less bounce too so they're probably gonna suit a shallow swing more. The Ping are higher bounce and should suit diggers more. Having said that, I'm a sweeper and I played my friend's G430 clubs for a round and I loved them.

@@StuMarston Also a sweeper - love the i230.