so

@@scp049leplaguedocter3 mebody once told me

@@lookatel3658 th

@@user-tf9hk4tq7v e world was gonna roll m

@@totally.normal e

It’s 50 Mach to be precise. Parker Solar Probe has a max speed of 565 Mach.

@@mako2719 UAP speeds baby

Seems like such a strange thing imagining the Mach number on something that usually travels in a vacuum where there is no air or sound. The thought of how quickly it would get melted in earth's atmosphere.

Why does everybody use mach to measure speed in a vacuum,? Correct me if I’m wrong, but I’m quite sure that a mach number is the result of a calculation of the speed of an object and the density of the atmosphere, if there is no atmosphere, how can a mach number be implemented?

Mach number is a ratio between the speed of something and the speed of sound in the given environment which makes it dimensionless and not really a measure of speed. People like to "dimensionalize" Mach numbers by assuming that the exact setting involves the earth's atmosphere at the average temperature at sea level. Even then, that's only the upstream Mach number since the speed of sound gets significantly faster whenever compression work is done and the gas is getting hotter.

I mean... Even without friction, moving air is still considered work. And It will have to move a lot faster at this height (unless it has wings, then it is just a plane, since Bernoulli's principle should work without friction).

yeah sorry I forgot to include resistances

in my math problems the ISS orbits at 0 ft, not 10000 ft take that

Flight simulator 2004

lol

Nah, brah, it's pretty much perfectly level flight, albeit one that puts the SR-71 to shame.

@@h8GW Nope. At that altitude (even pretending drag doesn't exist) sooner or later your path is going to intersect the Himalayas.

And it also starts saying the R- word.

I second this. Trying to figure out where I’m looking at whilst chilling with a beer and some music would be fucking awesome

​@@mcfowler1675 aren't there live streams from the ISS out there somewhere? Thought I have seen something like that some time ago

Or goes around the earth once while visiting various parts of the world

@@florianmisof1988 NASA has 24/7 live views from ISS looking down on the Earth, and there are a crapton of apps for ISS tracking...most are ok, some are really good, depending on features youbwant there's an app to fill whatever you need.

and yeah, that would be awesome

It's about ten minutes from horizon to horizon. Either from NW to SE or from SW to NE depending the part of the period of the sinusoidal that you catch. A nice watch to see, kind of a family hobby when we are outside right after dawn. Bright as Venus.

@@SergioGomez-qe3kn Seeing the ISS fly overhead is just sublime.

yep ive seen a satellite circle my view before

@@platyhelminthes2877 With how bright the dot was, I immediately pulled out the tracker.

@OpenYourMind I saw the bright dot heading over my head and immediately thought it might be the ISS. The tracker confirmed it. If I had a potent small telescope next to me (and steady hands), I would be able to make out details optically. Edit: Turns out the reply was deleted so here you go. "So an app tells you something flew overhead yet wheres the evidence that its actually up there? Fools. Trusting in strangers and stupid apps that lie to you about everything. Fools."

where is the second tower tho

​@@5blocksmc979 dude, the fucking tower was hit by the ISS at mach 22. You really think there is going to BE any first tower?!?!? That is the second tower you see my man. The first one was pulverized into its core molecular structers in a matter of milliseconds when the first ISS hit.

“We missed!”

Mir has arisen and entered the chat

Would there be much left after the first one?... It has nearly 3 kilotons of kinetic energy. Even if it's not delivered in the most effective way, that's still nearly two Douglas AIR-2 Genies.

Bruh, Voyager made it to the Delta quadrant in like the 90s...

It doesnt exist, grow up

@@kidwave1 Dude you're the one who needs to grow up

@@escoosy1763 You dont even know WHY there are 360 degrees in a circle, or WHAT YEAR we are actually living in, so your opinions mean nothing.

@@kidwave1Do you have evidence that it does not exist?

I guess we can call it an event horizon

Takes about 45 minutes, however it goes into Earth shadow, and being in low Earth orbit. one can only see it shortly before sunrise or after sunset

@@malcolmabram2957 are you in a very Northern latitude by any chance? In most of the world, it can fly directly over head at night, which takes a few minutes. I can imagine if you're very Northern or very Southern, you'd only catch it low to the horizon where it's further away and takes longer.

@@edonslow1456 I am wrong. Lets do a bit of math. The ISS orbits at an altitude of 250 miles. Using the Omni horizon calculator, the horizon from whence it can be first seen is 1440 miles away. That means it travels 2880 miles from horizon to horizon. At 17500 mph, this means the ISS will take about 10 minutes, whilst it is in view.

​@@malcolmabram2957yes, you are spot on, it normally takes 10 - 12 minutes horizon to horizon with a clear sky. It is a spectacular sight.

There's a real bullet train close up video here driving past at 200+ mph, you should check it out. It's damn fast. Just watching the video feels like it was going to destroy the guy filming it close by. I mean, the size of something that big driving past you that quickly. Boom! And it's gone after a few seconds.

@@kleroterion1196 From apes that can throw literal shit at high velocity to apes who can throw rooms around at high velocity, we sure have evolved.

*if* the ISS could fly that fast in atmosphere, aerodynamic forces would rip it to smithereens 😆

Cant wait to see some alien conspiracy nutter cut out the video to use a proof of aliens visiting earth! 🤦‍♂🤣

Yeah calls in the BS lol

Niiicee

Imagine that. And that is at altitude. If it did the same speed at 1km high it'd literally kill people passing by.

Speed is ridiculous, but still nothing in space. Even lightspeed is nothing in the universe. There are objects in space, 13 billion light-years away. So light needs 13 billion years to reach them.☹️ No chance for us to get there, sadly. We need wormholes or so. Cutting corners.

Cuz space is HUGE!!! Lol

@@johnvanhal2450 Space has a lot of space

Very good aerodynamics

@@theendlessvoid7124 the solar panels are secretly wings

How does it not go of in flames?

@@afrosch461 NASA space magic

Why NASA? The station is supported by engines on the Russian segment.

Liar.

There's a website, either the NASA one or Heavens Above, where you can watch it orbit a 3D earth from its actual altitude.

With the smooth music playing at the background

He just released a 30 min video showing the full earth orbit.

Yessssss and 50 minutes of that video would be oceeeeeeeeans 😁😁😁😁😁😁

Hell yeah, they're a legend.

Nah they be flyin

They got Usain Bolt's cameraman to do the job

No problem y'all 🤗 that was just a warmup

Joke's on you. It was filmed by a drone.

Hey Mr Kim, your grandfather put them there, so you tell me.

i had literally the exact opposite reaction to this.... if it ONLY takes 90 minutes to so clearly see a complete orbit around the earth, it wouldnt take long at all to just sit here and look at every spot of the surface of the entire earth.... that seems FANTASTICALLY more tiny than it should be...

Half of this comment had actually some sense

Fearless Leader!

@@7thsluglord363 every spot but just along that path, you'd have to do countless orbits at different angles to see everything

And then when you compare the speed of light to galactic or even just interstellar distances, it becomes the snail

@@Suppise152 It's crazy. The distance between galaxies is so massive that even at the speed of light it'd take years to get to a close galaxy, nevermind one that is extremely far. If we tried to go to a far galaxy with the speed of the ISS, all the stars in the universe would likely die out before we reach it. We're like ants inside our own little park

@@unocualqu1era not just years, not even centuries or millenniums. Eras.

Humans will have to learn to bend the fabric of space-time continuum in order to explore the cosmos. Go warp or go nowhere.

I liked all of your replies because I’m that nice 👍 lol

Amazing

@@AmazingFacts-xw6ru Facts.

Cool

Wie geht‘s so im Steirischen Land?

Heck of a place to put an airport

Add to that that they fly over mountains that should be taller than 10,000 ft.

LMFAAFO 👏👏👏👏👏🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

the mountains missed ISS.

Considering how well the ISS is holding up at those speeds, mountains arent a real deal

And the towers in nyc

They're known on campus as the PISS.

i dont think you'd even see it, it would be less than a frame i think LOL

Actually the Parker Solar probe is traveling FASTER THAN 0.01% the speed of light, it travels at roughly 0.064%, or did, at its closest approach to the sun, it reached a top speed of 192.2 km/s, that means it could get from Cape Canaveral Florida to San Francisco California in 20.8 SECONDS, that’s a distance of 3,993 km

Actually makes the earth feel small

@@AverageAlien exactly what I think.

@@technoquetz126 It hasn’t quite reached 0.064% yet but it’s gotten up to 0.054% In 2025 it will hit 0.064%.

I saw it in the day

I spotted it under the moon, although only a split second bcs it was on the edge of the moon light. But still considered it as lucky i guess ;)

From anywhere on the planet? I would think only those in a narrow corridor around the earth could see it.

You can just get an app and setup alerts just before it goes over. It will tell you when, from which bearing and for how long it will be visible.

@@fefferryerr1818You can see it anywhere as long as your latitude is within the bounds of its inclination. ISS inclination is 51.6 degrees so if you’re latitude is -51.6 through 51.6 degrees you’ll be able to see it when it passes over you.

That Earth is flat does not mean it's a disk shape.

@@bukkaratsuppa6414 the earth is round you goober

@@YBehri Why limiting yourself at strictly following parallels? We can start in the northern hemisphere and encircle Earth by diagonal, entering southern hemisphere.

You can't orbit on a parallel, unless it's the equator. Your ground track will always cross the equator and go into the northern and southern hemispheres. This is why you always want to launch as close to the equator as possible (unless your goal is a polar orbit), which is why the US uses Florida and the Soviets chose Baikonur.

You get nothing

I can't see an Astronaut

@@thomassmiththekingbeeits a joke

🤣🤣🤣👍🏻

That's really cool! Thanks for sharing. 👍

Thanks buddy really awesome and informative :D

ngl, im surprised i didnt see any "didn't ask" or nerd emoji bs shit replying to this. nice to see something like this without that shit for once.

*b*mb location*

I just thought NYC received all of its drinking water from the Hudson. But that's probably where all the crap goes.

Wtf is molasses

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molasses

Wtf is molasses

Wtf is molasses

Wtf is molasses

U are so funny dude, such an original comment wow

Give new meaning to "Eye in the sky".

We get it, you have never had one original thought in your entire life

@@MajorOctofuss Is every word not a remix of a dictionary? is every word not a specific order of the alphabet? does schleeble seem original when the letters already exist? You have a playlist with remixed songs. Is that original?... Ive never seen someone say what im saying.. is that original enough?

@@thelastsliceofcheese9057 dude i literally lost braincells trying to read this please stop typing for a the rest of 2024 we’re trying to have a society here

It doesnt exist, grow up

This is a simulation dude

​@@Steve.780and that was a joke dude

The universe is indeed a simulation, yes.@@Steve.780

What was the cameraman flying to keep up. a tethered glider, maybe?!

@@Steve.780whooooosh….

Nasa project? It's called International Space Station for a reason.

@@TeaTimeee Well, basically they actually present you with SCAMS / HOAXES just as deceptive as the OP video here...yet nary a one of you seems to think, how about we go to their opponents and see if they have anything to say about WHY they do these things...are they masonic actors just lying to everyone such as what is claimed (by the opponents)..basically I will summarize it for you, THEY LIE ABOUT EVERYTHING. Yet you have been programmed to trust AND obey since you were little by staring at the TELL LIE VISION programming boob tube that whenever someone comes and tries to wake you up, you basically scream bloody murder because you enjoy your ignorance...you seem to think it is BLISS...yet just like with the big pharma debate recently, just KNOW there are two sides to the discussion...if you only have knowledge of ONE of those sides you are surely missing the FULL PICTURE...and as mentioned most people are so asleep/clueless that they even enjoy their utter ignorance. Yet remember YOU HAVE been told, so if you can read this and still be happy with being ignorant KNOWING there is much much more to the story than you are aware of, then what is stopping you from actually learning?

@@TeaTimeee fr

Yes

Gosh, I thought the simulation shows the same angular speed, rather than the same circumferential-tangetial speed. :D

Less time and a faster speed

I know right? Compared to things moving at relativistic speeds, both the earth and the ISS in this video are basically standing still.

It’s insane speed of light is at 300,000 while the ISS is in one digit

Well, being out of the atmosphere helps a lot in reaching those speeds, but it’s impressive nevertheless

There's a reason why more than 95% of a space rocket's weight at lift-off is fuel.

What blows my mind more is that cpu's can perform billions of operations per second and each transistor inside them is only a few times larger than an atom. One rocket during ww2 wouldn't mean much, but a modern cpu would change the entire course of the war.

@@puppergump4117 I believe the Turing machine was invented around WW2 and it was indeed game changing. It might not have been using tiny transistors, but it was capable of running nearly any algorithm and it changed the course of the war.

I would actually like a full 90 minutes simulation experience at this speed along a great circle of the earth. Would be really fun to see!

No sir, it doesn't , it can not do that, it's impossible, it's a big lie,

@@SharpObserver1A But you've seen it in this video

@@hansvonflammenwerfer2817 this is a simulation, it cant be possible beacause of drag force, thrust, friction and some other physics , the atmosphere does not allow an object, device, space shuttle or space station to travel at such a speed within our atmosphere, he would be torn apart, due to the various friction points of the ISS station this would be physically impossible, the video is a simulation for us to understand what it would be like if it were possible to see the path it takes at a height of 10000 feet. If you have doubts just google about >>space shuttle atmosphere reentry

Not accurate at all actually.

Beautiful! You are sane, as opposed to insane aka using the degenerate colloquial phrase "off of."

@@linyenchin6773 I see nothing wrong with "off of."

@@linyenchin6773 🤓🤓

This crossed my mind too, but I concluded that the shockwave would be extremely short-lived, a tiny fraction of a second. After that, the whole thing would burn up and evaporate in the dense atmosphere. At this speed, even the air is like a concrete block.

@@rnzoli My comment was more hypothetical much like the video itself. I doupt the ISS could reach 100mph without running into serious integrity issues.

how is this possible. If its low u wont see it bcs of how fast its going and if its high, u wont see it bcs of how small it looks.

its not this fast or this low.

​@@risky_von3117 if its low itll burn up due to the air molecules hitting it at hypersonic speeds

@@texasfossilguy it is this fast, but not this low. it sits in low earth orbit and because theres is no air resistance or anything stopping it from moving it just makes a steady orbit around earth every 90 minutes

its basically free falling all the time..

They actually used a camera drone called Hubble and flew behind it, still very impressive

I would like to see it go all the way around pole to pole. I bet it can't go that way.

They call me superman for a reason , and kept that camera very steady too , your welcome.

Better open a window to let all the smoke from the heat shield out.

@@aelux4179This wasn’t real footage 😢

At mach 10 at 30m, the windows would need to be opaque to prevent cooking the crew from IR from atmospheric heating.

@@Pho7on It's a sci-fi book with highly sophisticated future technology, friction wasn't a problem

That is correct. If the ISS orbited at the altitude shown in the video, it would have a way greater speed, and it would only be able to do that if there were no atmosphere.

​​@@Kaiser58 It would need to accelerate only a little, as the orbital velocity is ~28 500 km/h at an altitude of 3 km

It's here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rtx2jc2gmrbLd2Q.html

@@Tomislav_B. Haha

He doesnt need to render its not an animation its a game he just need to record it and then uploa dit