it will definitely help@@pppp-fr6fo

That makes me a cool person, nice!

Then consider me Miles Davis

I am not cool so I can't subscribe

i think you missed that psvr comes to pc.

I never made those statement. I said the ability to replay flat games doesn't sell hardware. Just like no one went out and bought a quest to play half-life 1 or doom 3

there is definitely a place for hybrids but its not for selling hardware@@tb1235

I did it with RE 4 VR. And since I just beat in it VR, I saw no reason to even bother with the new remake. It won't beat playing it in VR.

@@BlakeBlackstonethe remake is also playable in vr now with much better visuals than the original

That or a port of the 1st one atleast , I don't understand why they couldn't just enable them to work even without graphical overhauls etc

There are more, but Astrobot and Blood & Truth are two games I would love to see remade and/or get a sequel. But Sony just seem to have lost all interest in supporting the PSVR2.

Astrobot 2 will be announced or even released this year.

Astrobot, Wipeout and other games would help a lot. But especially Astrobot. Or playing flatscreen titles in on a virtual 3d screen. Seeing Ghost of Tsushima in 2d in PSVR2 was quite disappointing.

Buy d day enhanced on psvr2 easily the best multiplayer shooter on psvr2

Exactly its worked great for Vision Pro but Sony can't be bothered.

Buy d day enhanced on psvr2 easily the best multiplayer shooter on psvr2

Does the psvr2 seem blurry to you? I might have to adjust something.

@@jeffghant4760 PSVR2 is the least blurry out of all of my headsets. Buy the global cluster headstrap. Makes a world of difference.

@jeffghant4760 not anymore, but it did at first. Found out I had the sweet spot a little off, and even a little off centered messes with the clarity. One big downside of fresnel lenses.

@match30xgaming haven't tried that one yet, been mostly messing with Pavlov and Contractors on my Quest.

Same for both

Same here. !!! I actually tried playing re4 flat after VR and the experience without VR is honestly shit for me as a VR gamer

@@waleedisnowagamecatspecifi1499 shout out to the white tiger

This is the exception not the norm

@Gamingwithmatteo311 yes it is but it should be the norm as it is better. If in this matter we stick to ground realities then we all will be playing games like gorilla tag instead of re4 remake. We should be rooting and striving towards the best quality. Without psvr2 that wont be possible and we hope sony starts talking about their plans

I used to have a problem with choice and always get buyers remorse lol

@@ThatDorkyReviewShow Haa, I think most people do 😂 I know some people that are actually paralyzed by choice and never pull the trigger. They miss out on the entire experience because of over-analyzing.

Identifying emotionally with consumer product engagement is a recipe for unhappiness fr though. looking for validation of that though online videos just makes it worse. That's not a knock on Mattao311's content, which is nicely produced and engaging.

I bought both PSVR2 and Quest 3 and was going to return the one I didn't like. Quest 3 went back. I must mention I have a sim racing chair setup and Gran Turismo 7 with worth $1K alone! No PCVR game can beat GT7. That and Pavlov is so less janky and so is Breachers.

@@forbidden76😂😂

I keep hearing this. The wait for me to upgrade to a Quest 3 is killing me haha.

@@NinjaGuyVR Don’t worry, the Quest 2 is by no means unplayable! The Quest 3 was a fat chunk of change so I just got the headset with no battery head straps or anything so whenever it dies I still hop back over to my Quest 2 and the transition is fine but definitely noticeable. The Quest 3 is a clearer more fluid version of the Quest 3. It definitely isn’t some massively huge upgrade, it’s just like being in a fog for so long and suddenly coming back to clarity and forgetting what clarity was supposed to be 😂 And the tracking is definitely smoother and controllers fit better in my hands personally. I’m 6’4” with giant hands and these little controllers feel great to me. The tracking is definitely improved though. I play a lot of Population:One and noticed I wasn’t needing to move my wrists as much to control recoil properly. The smallest movements are picked up by the tracking so you don’t have to put as much emphasize in your movements anymore. Same thing with reloading. I didn’t feel like my motions had to be so exaggerated anymore in order for them to work. I could move at a smoother pace and have it track very well. I’m excited for you to get yours! But like I said, it isn’t a massive jump in experience like going to PCVR, it’s just the next stepping stone forward, but it’s a great step forward!

Same dude. I still have my Quest 2 and use it from time to time to compare and the Quest 3 is way sharper. It's mainly due to the pancake lens as it has a way bigger zone where the visuals stay clean and crisp. The Quest 3 is like putting on prescription glasses for someone with poor vision and using the Quest 2 is now like taking those glasses off and having blurry vision in comparison. Enjoy!

I will give quest3 a try someday. So many youtubers were comparing quest2 as a better alternative to psvr2 prior to quest3. I ended up buying q2 but it was so uncomfortable and bad looking that i returned it i 2 days. Now youtubers are pointing out that pancake changes the game completely so i will give it a shot. But psvr2 looks very clear and good to me when the game is optimized. Quest2 was very ugly and washed out colors

@@waleedisnowagamecatspecifi1499 I've never tried the PSVR but I play PCVR via my gaming rig with an RTX 3080 which is a bit faster than a PS5 so I kinda get the best of both worlds in a sense. VR still has a lot of refinement to get to the point where mainstream consoles are. We are essentially in the Super Nintendo days of VR at the moment but it's moving quickly. Try getting an elite strap for comfort. I have the Zyber one but Kiwi also makes super comfortable straps.

don't forget skyrim VR with mods....it is so...immersive (with mods)

It's not the launch window for Quest 2 and that's even higher.

I agree with the frustration, and it's doubled imo in the case of PSVR 2 because Sony themselves hamstrung it right from launch. They decided at launch it'd be a good idea to exclusively sell it through their own obscure website (Playstation Direct) in most of the major gaming markets. You couldn't buy one at a Best Buy or Walmart or off Amazon in the US for MONTHS after launch. Add to that a "marketing campaign" that's alternated between piss-poor and non-existent, and the complete refusal from anyone at the company to actually make any sort of statement that they plan on supporting it long term. It's sort of a miracle it's sold as many units as it has, considering the utterly incompetent handling from Sony. That said, I disagree somewhat about PSVR 1 being abandoned too quick. Sony developed and released games for PSVR 1 for around 3 years, then continued to fund VR titles from third-parties for it well into its 6th year on the market. Sony is the reason Moss Book 2 launched exclusively for PSVR 1, same with Hitman 3 and Iron Man. As for your point about Sony being hypocrites, you're being ridiculous. There's a huge difference between paying for a single game to be exclusive, and buying an entire company and making ALL of their games exclusive; and an even bigger difference between that and buying literally the OLDEST AND BIGGEST PUBLISHER in videogames, with all their studios and IP. And what does Sony not porting their PSVR 1 games to PSVR 2 have anything to do with this? They're Sony's games, they can port them if they want (I think they should, but it's irrelevant to the MS/ABK deal). As for RE4 Remake, Sony paid for Capcom to port it to VR. Why shouldn't they get exclusivity? Look at it the other way, if Sony couldn't make RE4 Remake exclusive to PSVR 2, do you think they'd pay Capcom to port it? I doubt it. They wanted it to be a selling point for PSVR 2, that's why they paid for it. Also if the RE8 or RE4 Remake deals are anything like the deal for the RE7 VR port to PSVR 1, it'll be exclusive for 1 year, then Capcom won't bother porting it anywhere else because it can't run on a Quest, and nobody on the PC VR side is going to pay them for a port. Between the different types of headsets and the practically infinite variations of PC hardware, porting to PC is a technical nightmare, and Capcom just isn't interested in all that hassle for a market as small as PC VR. They wouldn't be interested for PSVR 2 either if Sony wasn't footing the bill.

Get a gaming computer dude.

@@JBBost I definitely want to at some point.

So far games are extremely limited and no pc connections

@@Gamingwithmatteo311 are there any controls it talk about eventually adding controllers and games lie super hot vr etc I'm trying to understand what they think they are doing 😂

Yes on Quest, but often cut down version as the PSVR2 get the better version. Quest is mobile phone tech so limited on what it can do.

From what I've heard daily active players on asgard 2 is insanely high but this was a free q3 title so everything is skewed. Meta wasn't looking to make money on this one, it's more for promotion

I played AW2 basically every day for a month and I finally beat it. It was definitely an insanely good game. But yeah it was included with the Quest 3, so tracking sales of the game itself won't show you how many are playing or loving it.

@@toddgraves3447 I haven't finished because I just keep playing the uncharted rifts

@Gamingwithmatteo311 yeah I was the opposite. I got into the uncharted rift a bit, but I barely touched it overall because I was focusing on the story. I'm probably going to play a bit more of the rift now.

Let's see what happens a year from now

I just don't understand where this idea is coming from. It's not going to happen. First of all, it wouldn't run in VR. Digital Foundry are basically betting that GTA 6 is going to run at 30 fps at far lower than max resolution on PS5 flat. There's no way to even get it to a stable 60 fps to reproject to 120 at an acceptable framerate. Even if they could make it run, Rockstar isn't going to waste their time with VR. GTA 5 measures its revenue in the BILLIONS, and GTA 6 is likely to be even bigger. The entire VR market is tiny compared to the market Rockstar is targeting with GTA 6 (and the PSVR 2, sad to say, is a small fraction of the VR market). Say it would take a team of 20 people 8 months of work to port GTA 6 to PSVR 2 (a very VERY low estimate), Rockstar would make more money if they had those 20 people spend those 8 months working on DLC or other content they could sell to the flat audience instead. And Sony literally couldn't afford to pay them enough to make it worth their while to do a VR port. It's. Just. Not. Going. To. Happen.

GTA 6 is definitely going to be in VR... on PC unofficially by the community.

There are plenty of things I can add like lack or software returns but I didn't get into it too deeply

Still waiting on mine

i'm curious on your opinion, just trying to figure out which headset to upgrade for teathered pcvr@@Gamingwithmatteo311

I agree we all feel that way and hybrid games are awesome but the important factor you miss is they aren't selling the hardware. It's not what Sony needs now. It's not about my opinion it's about sales. Your gt 7 example aligns percently. People already bought the hardware because it was new and then they needed something to play. It's not they bought the psvr 2 because gt7 became a vr game.

I agree with you that it seems like the hardware sales is lacking but I don't think it's due to a lack of games but a lack of marketing from Sony. I recall when the PSVR 1 was being launched, it had frequent ads, a lot of game stores allowed you to try it in person. Then contrast that with the PSVR 2 whereas at launch depending on your location, it was only available from sony's website robbing you the chance of encountering by walking into a store. There were no dedicated events solely to VR, the online adverts seemed lacking, they could have paid massive youtubers and streamers to promote their new device but barely did it. Now when I speak with the average playstation owner they're not aware of the PSVR 2 but are familiar with the PSVR 1. Every person I allowed to try my PSVR 2 headset to play GT 7 or Horizon, lost their minds at but sadly for most people they aren't aware of it.

wireless isnt a sure thing and most ps5 are wireless themselves and that is never good for vr, i always wire my quest 3 to my pc because my router is too far away, wireless is always bad on my quest so it makes sense.

Pancake lenses and the OLED displays wouldn’t play nicely and making the headset wireless would have significant increased the cost and weight and stuff.

Sony's strategy seems to be mostly built around hybrid games like GT7 and the Resident Evil titles. Those sorts of games encourage longer play sessions, so user comfort is very important. Making the headset wireless would have meant extra hardware in the headset, plus a battery, which would all increase the headset's weight and the amount of heat it produces. Also both of those options (wireless and pancake lenses) would have increased the cost of the headset, which people say is too expensive already.

​@@Deadlines-Xyou don't make any sense

I hope Sony does this, but it's not quite as cheap or easy as you may think. It took Capcom 9+ months to port RE4 Remake to PSVR 2. Their engine already supports PSVR 2, and they had gameplay code from RE8 that they could re-use. Despite all that, RE4 Remake doesn't actually have as many VR interactions as RE8 (you don't physically open doors or drawers/cupboards), and it still took 9+ months. Lots of people point to UEVR and say "See? Porting flat games to VR is easy!" without acknowledging all the jank and lack of interactivity. If Sony released a VR port at that level, they'd be ripped to shreds (and rightly so). We also don't even know if Sony's in-house game engines (Decima, Insomniac's engine, Suckerpunch's engine, Naughty Dog's engine, SSM's engine etc.) support VR. The only first-party studios I know of at Sony that for sure use a VR ready engine are Housemarque (Returnal) and Firesprite (Horizon Call of the Mountain).

@GreyMatterShades Absolutely. I was more saying it's likely going to be faster, less expensive, and less risky than the developing new IP and games from scratch. Quickly building up a large library of well known games with just the occasional new exclusive seems like the first needed step at this point. Time is short before people start bailing on the platform.

@@brettcameratraveler Ah, I get what you're saying, and I totally agree. Porting flat games is the cheapest and easiest way to get triple-A games into VR, so I hope they do it as much as they can. That said, I think spinoffs like Horizon Call of the Mountain are also cheaper than building a game from scratch, and they are a better way to sell the headset because they offer unique experiences in well known franchises. But they are more expensive and take more time to make than VR ports, so we'll naturally get fewer of them. I just hope Sony is working on some.

Its not possible

Sorry if I missed it, a 2070 will run vr pretty well. Personally I look for 2080 or better but you can upgrade down the road. How much is the pc, I hope it's real cheap

I've been doing RTX 2070 Super and I'm not running into any issues at all :) you should be good to go for PCVR gaming.

Yeah watching you try to explain that to everyone is rough, man. I try my best to help, but some people just don't want to face the reality of how the headset is doing right now. And I get it. For my part, I've been expressing some of these concerns since before launch. I don't even own a PSVR 2, which is insane since PSVR 1 singlehandedly reinvigorated my love of gaming and I own more games for it than any other game system except PC. Sony's lack of commitment to it is the main thing that made me hold off. I wanted to see what they had to show for a second wave of first-party software. Now I'm not even sure that second wave will ever come. 😿

Unfortunately devs have been saying Sony is no longer finding third party titles

It's few and far between. Psvr2 allows for optimization pc just can't offer due to having random hardware out there. Only a few devs account for this

Some might say that "No Man's Sky" is better and while I do agree on the stability arguments, it is stability in 60FPS, which is nauseating.

In Sony's defense meta doesn't sell solo controllers either but it should be warrantied. Combine that with the no game return policy, ugh

If its AAA experiences you want, psvr2 is currently winning in that department

Q2c gamer

@@Gamingwithmatteo311 what episode?

@nightblade1102 oh man that was awhile back before December but we discussed it again last thursday

I've had PSVR2 since day one and it's jaw-dropping and next generation VR and worth every penny

@@mrreefer6792 no argument there. I honestly don't understand that there are so many people out there who have never even tried vr.

PSVR2's terribly small sweet spot, CABLE(in 2023...Baffling), Giant rings surrounding the controllers, nasty OLED mura & god rays, Bulky front visor, discomfort around the nose area due to the lack of padding, no colour pass through or any unique VR Eco system really hurt it. Sure, the Quest 3's black levels, Colours and horse power can't compete. Even it's controller haptics aren't in the same ball park, and it doesn't include adaptive triggers either. Regardless, Quest 3 does everything else better. I wish i could magically connect my Quest 3 wirelessly to my PS5 and just use that to play PSVR2 exclusives and whatever else. :P I'd get a wide sweet spot, pancake clarity, buttery smooth CRT-like motion, no mura or god rays, minimal glare, NO cable, no ring'd controllers and it's easily more comfortable. I'll gladly sacrifice black levels and Colour for now, until Meta releases Quest Pro 2 in 2025 with a micro-oled display. ;)

@80sHolic7 everything about the Q3 aa far as VR gaming goes is beneath the PSVR2.... I've never had any issue with getting a great immersing experience with my PSVR2, must be a personal thing (just sayin) maybe you don't know how to properly set it up and calibrate it....the games aren't up to par with PSVR2 games either and the immersion isn't as good Q3 doesn't even have foveated viewing or haptic feedback....I've never experienced discomfort wearing the PSVR2 either nor has anyone I let try mine.....not to mention PSVR2 has already got the "Golden Joystick" award

It's Q2C VR. It's an older episode from months ago though, not sure which one.

Thanks for the support. I'm happy to help any way possible

Sony makes money off games, not hardware. They'd make zero money off PC VR game sales, so it's of no advantage for their hardware to work on that platform. The only way they'd want to sell PSVR 2 on PC is if they wanted to liquidate stock.

Completely agree.

this is what we need

I thought I wouldn’t mind the wire, except for fitness/music games where it might get into the way. But even in seated games, the touch of the wire against my body breaks the immersion for me. I’m still very happy with the PSVR2, but I’d prefer it wireless with a battery!

Do you have any stats to back this up?

Q2cgamer