I do hope the publicity generated by the Netflix documentary will yield new clues in ascertaining who committed such a cruel and cowardly crime!

The Establishment does not like to have light shone upon its dark world.

She was about to rumble Saville. Or maybe a stalker jealous of her impending marriage.

Hope that a day truth will be revealed and the killer found and punished!

Jill's brother is in denial, which is understandable - this goes a lot deeper unfortunately, in my humble opinion

If her brother reckons this was a lucky opportunistic killing and Jill was in the wrong place at the wrong time , can he explain how this happens outside her house that she visited weekly on a Monday morning. That's premeditated isn't it not?

Jill found out about Saville and was determined to pursue it.

All due respect to Jill's brother / family but the face who took Jill out knew her exact movements on the day - They also knew exactly how to handle a gun and more so how to use it with extreme precision - Who ever took Jill out was very cool under pressure even shutting the gate before leaving the scene of what was a callous cold blooded execution! - My belief is Jill actually knew Or was at least familiar with who confronted her at her door - There was no attempt to take from her Or break into her house - The soul purpose was to execute her in a planned and meticulous attack and it was cert not carried out by no opportunist

She was tracked..... so who exactly knew that she would go to her property at that specific time to collect her mail? Was her lifestyle precisely and routinely sheduled?

it was pointed out in the documentary that the front walk at her house was very short, and that was evident in the photos, it was just a few steps from the footpath to the front door. And the blood in the photos was closer to the footpath than the front door. Since she drove there and parked right in front, it just doesn't seem likely that it was someone following her, but someone waiting there. She would have been right at the door and opening it and maybe even inside already if someone walking along the street just decided to attack her, it would only take her a few seconds to cover that short distance. Hope they find the killer eventually.

It's interesting Nigel uses the plural when referring to the killer " they" "They're" etc. 🤔 he also heard that jill was involved in an accident but carried on working on an article. How strange 🤔 wasn't concerned enough to investigate if she was ok or not then.

Is the Killer someone who gained financially from killing Jill Dando, it was no "Lucky strike" as her brother says..or was it? Who gained both her estate and that of her fathers estate? That's allot of money, all those years ago, particularly before she was married to her partner, which was to be imminent.

No such thing as wrong place wrong time she was at her home were she was supposed to be

She struck me as a really nice woman and a great role model intelligent and elegant. I was a shocking murder. I always thought it was a professional hit.

She was singled out, witnesses saw a man hanging around, it wasn't a opportunistic, who waits around for hours to then shoot anyone who comes along. I think it was a crazed fan or someone who was part of something she was working on.

Damn I forgot this happened. I think it would have been a bigger story these days with the internet. Anyone claiming she was killed because she was uncovering a story makes no sense. She was a news reporter. She wasn’t the one doing the digging, discovering hidden truths. Wouldn’t make any sense to take her out to hide a story.

It could be her fiance...just a hunch

Serbs did it

IF I WAS THE DETECTIVE LEADING THIS INVESTIGATION I WOULD DEDUCE THE FOLLOWING: 1.THERE ARE A NUMBER OF CLUES WHICH POINT TO THE HIGH PROBABILITY THAT SOMEONE VERY CLOSE TO HER, EITHER ORDERED HER KILLING, OR PULLED THE TRIGGER, UNLESS HER PHONE HAD BEEN TAPPED; AND, BY THE WAY, WE CAN DEDUCE THAT, SINCE THE GUN-SHOT WAS NOT HEARD, IT WAS PROBABLY A PROFESSIONAL HIT-JOB USING A PROFESSIONAL-STYLE SILENCER, OTHERWISE, THERE ARE A NUMBER OF OTHER CREDIBLE ALTERNATIVE SUSPECTS OR LEADS, AS OUTLINED BELOW, HOWEVER, IT LOOKS LIKE THE SUSPECT KNEW HER OR WAS TAPPING HER PHONE BECAUSE ONLY A FEW PEOPLE KNEW HER WHEREABOUTS THAT MORNING. JILL'S WHEREABOUTS THAT MORNING WAS ONLY KNOWN BY THOSE CLOSE TO HER INCLUDING HER BOYFRIEND, AND MAYBE, FAMILY MEMBERS, OR IT COULD BE THAT SOMEONE OR AN ORGANISATION WAS TAPPING HER PHONE; AT THAT TIME, JILL WAS LIVING AT HER BOYFRIEND'S HOME AND RARELY CAME HOME TO HER FULHAM HOME, SO SHE HAD SLEPT AT HER BOYFRIEND'S PLACE IN ANOTHER PART OF LONDON; BUT HER OWN HOUSE IN FULHAM, SHE HAD ALREADY TELPHONED SOMEONE CLOSE - i.e. HER BOYFRIEND OR RELATIVE THAT SHE WAS RETURNING TO HER HOME IN FULHAM TO COLLECT SOME FAXES THAT HAD BEEN SENT TO HER. THE CCTV FOOTAGE BEFORE HER ATTACK, DOES NOT SHOW SHE WAS BEING FOLLOWED, SO WHOEVER DID THIS, I CAN DEDUCE THE HIGHLY LIKELYHOOD THAT HER KILLER KNEW HER LOCATION EXACTLY - EITHER BY SOMEONE OR ONE ORGANISATION PHONETAPPING HER, OR BY SOMEONE WHO TOOK HER CALL DIRECTLY, i.e. BY HER BOYFRIEND OF FAMILY MEMBER. 2. I CAN DEDUCE, SHE WAS NOT IN THE WRONG PLACE AT THE WRONG TIME BECAUSE, TO HER KILLER, HE KNEW EXACTLY WHERE JILL WAS, AND TO HIM, SHE WAS EXACTLY IN THE RIGHT PLACE, NOT NECCESSARILY AT THE RIGHT TIME BECAUSE WITNESSES SAW SOMEONE LURKING AND WAITING FOR SOME TIME BEFORE SHE ARRIVED. ONE THING WE CAN BE SURE OF: JILL WAS NOT, AS HER OWN BROTHER TESTIFIED TO, IN THE WRONG PLACE AT THE WRONG TIME BECAUSE: WHO WOULD EVER SAY, "SHE IS IN THE WRONG PLACE AT THE WRONG TIME" WHEN SHE IS STANDING OUTSIDE HER HOME? SO, JILL'S BROTHER'S WORDS BEGGARS DISBELIEF. 3. ALSO, SINCE JILL PARKED DIRECTLY OUTSIDE HER HOME - A SHORT WALK TO HER FRONTDOOR - WE CAN DEDUCE THAT HER KILLER HAD BEEN WAITING FOR HER, RATHER THAN FOLLOWING HER. 4. OTHERWISE, THE ALTERNATIVE SUSPECT: IF JILL WAS IN THE MIDDLE OF AN INVESTIGATION EXPOSING A CHILD PEDOPHILE RING, THIS KILLING OF JILL WAS EITHER BECAUSE SHE KNEW TOO MUCH ABOUT THE BBC OR OTHER PERPETRATORS IN THE BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT - OR ELSE - THIS MAY HAVE BEEN THE RESULT OF A FORMER LOVER OR CURRENT, i.e. A LOVER'S REVENGE. 5. THE ALTERNATIVE SUSPECT COULD BE BY ANOTHER CREDIBLE LEAD WHICH WAS FROM A CONVICTED KILLER WHO SENT A LETTER STATING HE KNEW WHO KILLED JILL, WHO SAID HE HAD BEEN PART OF AN I.R.A. CELL. 6. OTHERWISE, HER KILLING WAS A RETRIBUTION FOR 17 JOURNALISTS KILLED IN A SERBIAN T.V. NEWS OUTLET IN THE BALKANS. ESPECIALLY, WHEN WE CONSIDER THAT THE BULLET FOUND AT THE CRIME-SCENE HAD BEEN TAMPERED WITH BY SOMEONE WITH KNOWLEDGE OF FIREARMS, i.e. WHICH PEOPLE IN THE BALKANS HAVE BEEN KNOWN TO PURCHASE SUCH TAMPERED-WITH BULLETS FROM RUSSIA. 7. FOR RETRIBUTION BY CRIMINALS AND THEIR SUPPORTERS FOR HER WORK IN GATHERING EVIDENCE TO CONVICT THEM AS A CRIMEWATCH PRESENTER. DID THESE DEDUCTIONS EVER CROSS ANYONE ELSE'S MIND? PLEASE COMMENT.

Strange bloke.