Do you think so? I think even this piece is not worth the effort leaning it. It's so uncomfortable and difficult to play, but musically banal and undeveloped.

smooth brain comment @@tobiaspeter6555

​@@tobiaspeter6555 On this listening, I have to agree. I found it very tedious.

😂😂😂

The problem is that you're compqring him to beethoven, an incompetent and overrated composer. Hummel is not even equal to that.

Thankfully Chopin was tasteful enough to limit his virtuosity in slower movements or pieces and avoid what occurs here from 15:37-17:01. Hummel had a tendency of overloading his slow movements with these kind of empty shows.

@@erika6651what a stupid comment

Trash 😂

So Lisztian

i also associated it with chopin@@erika6651

based

Kkkkkk seria o hino nacional inspirado em hummel? Kk

Se quiser chorar também pode, essas possibilidades eram muitas, não só Hummel; também em compositores italianos.

Mas nesse caso Hummel é que teria se. Inspirado no hino., levemente (uma reminiscência)

I’m not familiar enough with this period to state this with any certainty, but in listening to Hummel’s solo piano music I do hear hints of Chopin, even an influence. These pieces are certainly worth more hearings and study than they’ve been given in the last 100 or more years.

I find it fascinating - but nowhere near as inventive as either Beethoven or Schubert (both of whom were contemporary) - indeed it is difficult to accept that Hummel outlived both of them and yet seems to be using a somewhat older more CPE Bach-like harmonic language. There is certainly something about the ornate style that you can also see in Chopin - but Chopin elevated it to an entirely new level. Hummel, for me, misses the thematic development skill and rhythmic inventiveness of Beethoven, and the tone-colour of Schubert. Interesting, beautiful in parts, but understandable why Hummel's music has faded from popularity. All this is - of course - a personal opinion which you are most free to disagree with!!!

And the scherzo suggest Schumann. Doesn't it?

I completely disagree any Beethoven Piano Sonata is better than this

@@qwertyuiop-ke7fs yes definitely. Beethoven sonatas are more interesting.

Yeah definitely, less interesting but more complex and pianistic

Nessua somiglianza con questa!

Ничего удивительного,он был учеником Й.Гайдна,В А.Моцарта,А Сальери,Карла Черни.Его учеником был Феликс Мендельсон. Л.Бетховен был его другом,которому Гуммель посвятил несколько произведений

2121222

It is the same language but not the same impact.

?

Assolutamente d'accordo con te. È suonato in modo soltanto bellino... Purtroppo è un'interpretazione che non rischia niente, anzi, sembra quasi che l'interprete cercasse di non suonare. Il risultato secondo me è un'interpretazione superficiale. Se invece di essere scritto "Hummel" ci fosse scritto il nome di un compositore più "importante", sono sicuro che verrebbe fuori un'interpretazione assolutamente diversa.

You seriously say that? Study music first, then you can talk since you clearly don't know what you're talking about.

@@marcoponzio1644 Yes, I do. I think it‘s a bad interpretation. You can try to convince me otherwise.

@@jakobler3474 I won't

It reminds me of the Czerny "Velocity" studies: flashy and technical, but zero substance

It's like using Beethoven in the same sentence as Mozart when you compare Don Giovanni with any version of Fidelio.

This isn't cheap, it is charming and beautiful, and you're an ass.

@@franzeybler1499 yeah. and in comparison beethoven‘s sonatas are by far superior to any mozart sonata.

you are an insult for the humanity, you are useless behind a device, I remind you that Beethoven is an insult from a composer for people who prefer jazz or another style and qualify it from ignorance like you, please avoid reproducing yourself, no leave offspring

The constant reliance on the same rhytmic figures is annoying ,and the mark of the lesser composer.