I will never hate another brand more than I hate fair and lovely. I remember being forced to use it by my mother-she wouldn't let me go outside to play without it. It never ever blended properly , and always turned ashy. The kids in playground would make fun of me for" trying to be beautiful". One particular insult that sticks out can be loosely translated as "the crow thinks it can turn into a dove using fair and lovely." now as an adult I can laugh at how ridiculous the whole thing was, but as a kid, it really had me belive I was inferior because of my skin tone.

Never thought I'd hear a western influencer speak on how wrong fair and lovely is, thank you James!

I am from India and i can 100% assure you that Unilever is straight up lying about the concept of Fair & Lovely. One needs to have no degree to understand what an advertisement is trying to convey, the name itself explains what they stand for. The consistency of that cream is like baseline Nivea cream mixed with a talcom powder. On brown skin, it looks like cream paint, just what you would look like if you use a lighter shade of foundation which will eventually turn grey. Fair & lovely received alot of backlash and big pages like "Diet Sabya" proceeded to share the petition for people to sign which eventually led to the name change. The petitioners were disappointed & disgusted at how they twisted the word and still continued to do the same sh*t. I am NC 42 and i vividly remember while i was growing up, everyone around me used fair & lovely. Everyone who was dusky was advised to use it 3 times a day. Relatives would make fun of you and would recommend you to use the cream for fairer skin so you can be desirable in future to attract decent men. It's disgusting how a cream can feed racism. They made money off the colorism mindset and are still doing the same thing. The lighter you are, the more desirable and pretty you are. Often you're treated on the basis of skin color here. Imagine living in a brown country and being hated for having brown skin.

I haven't heard about the Jo Malone thing, but it's absolutely disgusting. I feel so bad for John Boyega, they basically stole his work. He should have been able to sue their ass dry for that.

Oh my god. The colourism around Fair & Lovely. That's why so many people were ecstatic to have Simone Ashley and Charithra Chandran starring in Bridgerton Season 2. You never see dark-skinned Tamil women starring in anything, especially not in India. I'm SE Asian and the colourism is strong and very prevalent still in my country of birth.

“You can also see that I picked at my skin here because I am a fucking idiot” 🤣🤣 That’s such an accurate statement for me 🤦🏻‍♀️

It’s like when Kim Kardashian wanted to trademark “Kimono” which was one of the dumbest thing that she could do. Legally I’m sure she could but ethically stupid. And when theee people claim a cultural term it’s dangerous and harmful.

The pimple patches thing reminds me of Disney trying to trademark "Dia de los Muertos." Also I think Susan G Koman tried to trademark the color pink they used for breast cancer awareness.

Paralegal here: trying to trademark "pimple patches" was a fool's errand; sending a cease & desist to anyone when you've only applied for the trademark is wrong; they did no research and I don't think they had an attorney, imo. Imagine if a company complied & the trademark was denied? They'd be culpable for damages. No way a category was approved as you said. 🖤💜

Stryx was being shaaaaaady as hell!! Everybody makes pimple patches now and it's really damning that they sent a cease and desist to a small company and not like loreal or something. It was an attempt to intimidate, for sure. I also can't believe that they didn't realize that an American company trying to trademark something from South Korea would look bad. Diverse staff or not, it smells a bit cultural-appropriation-y...

How did I not know about the Jo Malone thing? Wow. Poor John. I recall how they changed dramatically the posters for the Star Wars posters for the Chinese market by totally taking out his image 🤦🏽‍♀️

Stryx: We're a small company of only four emplyees. Also Stryx: We're ethically diverse. 🤔

I grew up watching Fair and Lovely ads. You summed it up perfectly. If you're not light skinned, you won't succeed in life is very much the explicit message. It was never about skin health. It's still very much a skin lightening cream, and people continue to use it for that reason. While these terms are not explicitly thrown around anymore , A LOT of Indian millennials and Gen Zers are very conscious and even disappointed in their skin colour.

Had no idea Jo Malone wasn’t affiliated with her brand anymore. Protecting her name is crucial since it wasn’t her decision. Asian markets change Western adverts all the time and some of them are 😮. Boyega’s ad was a personal reflection and feels it can’t be replicated by any ol’ actor. They could have told a new story instead if the original ad didn’t fit the audience

The pimple patches drama is just stupid 🤦🏻‍♀️😂 I remember using Loreal pimple patches almost 20 years ago..I cant believe they tried to pull that BS

The fact that Stryks is slyly trying to say the other company should talk to them, teach them and forgive them is so annoying. That letter was delusional and out of line, I don’t have to be kind to you or only speak about this in private.

The Pimple Patches thing... It makes me angry because they singled out this one small business rather than sending a cease and desist to ALL of the businesses that use the terms pimple patch/pimple patches to describe their product. But then, L'Oreal probably wouldn't have even had the mail intern open the letter, haha. It just feels so colonialist to literally try to steal the term from a S. Korean brand that they themselves were manufacturing in S. Korea. The whole thing makes me think their "legal team" is one of those online "attorney connect" things, where the attorney only talks to you for half an hour and can only give a certain number of answers and can't possibly research all the information needed to give an informed opinion. The attorney likely has no idea about the cosmetics industry, so they just gave the best information in that moment- which was "Yeah, if you want to call your product that you have to have a trademark/patent." It's the difference between a product name and a product type, and the whole thing just makes me think "What would happen if Garnier sued L'Oreal for the use of the term 'shampoo'?" Side note- This is the type of crap that comes from people who don't READ or RESEARCH for THEMSELVES starting businesses, when they don't know the first thing about how to run them.

I feel so bad for John Boyega, not just for the whole Jo Malone thing, but the way Disney treated him. The absolute gall of some people, he's a talented actor and seems like an all-around lovely guy, he deserved way better imo. Also lol at the Stryx thing, what kind of "research" can they have possibly done? Because I doubt they did any since they couldn't even be bothered to google "pimple patches" before sending that silly list of demands.

Every time I hear "metrosexual" I literally cannot believe we actually used to say that. So cringey.

Back in mid 2000s, I remember my roommate at the University in Bangladesh using Fair & Lovely every single day, hoping it will lighten her skin color. Name change isn't enough. Fair & Lovely is just the corporate face of a far deeply rooted colourism issue of the Indian Subcontinent. Every single girl of my generation had to endure through that via casual comments like, "oh she is so dark, who will marry her", or "poor her, she didn't get the fair color of her mom/dad". Or in some privileged cases of comparatively lighter skin girls like myself, would hear "better" version of such comments, "Thank God, she looks like her mom and not like her dad"! Fair & Lovely just used people's mindset for the purpose of cash grab (which is extremely wrong nevertheless). But it's the general people's deep insecurity surrounding the skin colour that bothers me the most. I am married to a white man from East Europe. Sometimes I wonder if my extended family (not parents/siblings) would embrace him with such open arms had he been a black man from USA/Africa for example. I could go on and on... Great video James! And you should definitely think of making a video about colourism in the skincare industry. I see a lot of fear mongering/advertisement by many brown skin "experts" with deeply questionable intention. To me, they seem like hidden colourism with replacing words like "lightening" by "brightening".

This may seem small to your other viewers, but I very much appreciated you saying "people of color and black people"!!! As a black woman whose struggles aren't the same as those people of color, it's nice to know that we can be in the same space and not just lumped together. I do remember this ad but had no clue about the cancelation. On another note, John Boyega can get it 😂😂

In South Africa, it's called Even & Lovely and it had one advert that was hated by South Africa, it was removed. Since then it hasn't released another advert but you can still find their products in some stores

Fair & Lovely in Pakistan also renamed itself to Glow & Lovely but their adverts are EXACTLY the same as before. They market it as helping you lighten your skin tone. They only changed *one* word in their product name.

So for trademarks in the US, you're correct that you can't copyright generic or descriptive names. The USPTO is going to have to review whether or not "pimple patches" as a product type is generic in the US specifically that it cannot be used, even if the name is generic in the industry/other countries - for example, Ugg Australia owns the "Ugg" mark in the US, but in Australia, ugg is a generic type of shoe, so they can't tm it there. With the "research" Stryx put into this issue, I'm gonna assume their lawyer ran a few trademark and google searches, and realized that nobody had tm'ed "pimple patches" *in the US*, but it possibly was in use by a few brands that were competitors of stryx. When you apply for/own a tm, one of the caveats is if you're not using and protecting your mark, you lose your rights. So, after filing an app, and launching their product in the marketplace, i wouldn't say it was uncommon within industry practices for stryx to send a C&D to Good Light and any other brands. You hit the nail on the head though by saying that this whole situation is legally appropriate but ethically inappropriate. In my opinion, the application and research was likely done by counsel or their interns who had little knowledge of the beauty industry, bc I would be shocked if the USPTO doesn't toss this out for being generic/descriptive.

Trademarking “pimple patches” good lord. Sounds like they attempted a SLAPP suit, if for no other reason than to get their name out there more 😑 Which no thanks, I’ve already forgotten their name. Good Light is an amazing brand though!

I've coveted Jo Malone fragrances for ages. Could never justify the prices. I had no idea about this. I think I'll manage without them now that I know.

When it comes to your story about John, this is pretty standard for Chinese advertising. There sadly is still a lot of Racism towards black people in China and brands will often cater to that because they want to sell their products in China. It’s a good example of money over morals.

So a cease and desist (at least here in the US) has no legal effect. It can, however, be used as evidence in litigation if the person who received it chooses to ignore it. Seems like like company who sent the letter was just trying to clear the way (basically bully)

with Fair & Lovely, I believe it could be a colorist thing. my Filipina friend in high school had a step-mom who would constantly badger her about lightening her skin. she said it would make my friend prettier and boys would like her more. they owned a small grocery and she used to nag that they could get the products for cheap, why won't you use them, etc etc. it weirded me out until my friend explained it to me and even then, it was still a little weird.

The whole Stryx thing feels like another example of western brands trying to cash in on the popularity of Korean beauty brands. The absolute flood of western brand sheet masks, multi-step skincare routines, facial massage tools, etc. was kind of off putting, for me at least. It's also kind of a weird decision, because anyone really into skincare enough to be familiar with Korean beauty would just buy the original Korean beauty product?

Re: the trademark conversation. In general, if you file for a trademark, if or when it is granted, that filing date is the effective date. It is normal, expected, and proper to attempt to enforce your trademark as long as you've filed for it. Most granted trademarks are even enforceable as of the date you started using the phrase. HOWEVER. In this specific case, it's laughable that they thought they'd be granted this generic trademark to begin with. In the US, there are currently two companies that hold registered/approved trademarks for a variation of pimple patches - 1 Hour Pimple Patches and Panic Pimple Patches. If they had done any research on the trademark before filing, they would've seen that each of those trademarks were granted with a specific disclaimer that the trademark DOES NOT protect "pimple patch" - it protects the specific phrase. And as Stryx's trademark application is for "Pimple Patches" (no other words or symbols), there's no way it's going to be granted. They would have a good cause for enforcing a trademark if they trademarked the term "Luna Pimple Patches" and then Good Light attempted to sell their Luna Pimple Patches in the US. But that's not what Stryx's TM is for so whatever research they (or more likely their lawyers) did is less than 5 min of a website search. Source: anyone can use the search tool of the US trademark and patent office website! 😊

"I thought a black piece of fluff was a blackhead" hahaha 🤣 I have done exactly the same thing 🤦😂

Wow that stryx letter is insane. Hope that company bankrupts itself. And to answer your questions, the letter they sent WAS a threat but they DIDN'T take any formal legal action because they had no grounds to do so. And they said the cease and desist was standard for a pending trademark -- in no way is it standard to file a cease and desist for something you don't even have a trademark on!! There's a more than likely chance they will never earn that trademark because it's such a common term and as you said, more of a category than a unique product offering. Sounds like they have some VERY shoddy legal 'experts' that lack even basic knowledge of the skincare space.

You know how many other brands have pimple patches?!! I wish all the other brands should go after them to see how that feels

Stryx's initial letter *is* a threat of legal action. Whether or not they made it via a lawyer is another matter. However, even basic research into trademark law would have shown them that they *cannot* trademark a product category. So I'm giving them a massive side eye

wow. that stryx letter makes me *furious* - gives me such manipulative, gaslight-y vibes. UGH. you're right, James, good light doesn't own them sh*t. definitely no answer, "constructive" (haha) exchange and definitely no forgiveness. pfff.

I'm pretty sure cease and desist is basically 'stop doing this or we WILL sue'. Regardless, it's not a product itself, but a *type* of product, and it's not unique by any means. Like trying to trademark strawberry shortcake because your brand makes reeeeaaally good shortcakes.

Attack the Block is so good. I was so lucky a friend owned a copy bc it is not super popular in the states. the practical effects layered with the CGI is so good. just super fun~

Really digging the new YT feature that is linking products directly in the video. Very cool & useful!

To me, in my own personal opinion allegedly, it sounds like Stryx was trying to target another brand of similar size and try to pinhole the name "pimple patch" to see if they could win a suit against them. Then if they won the lawsuit go on to bigger brands because they would have already had one win under their belt. But since they got shamed into seeing their wrong doings they backtracked. All my opinion, allegedly.

I agree, I don't think changing the name of the company is going to change Indian's disgusting views on colourism which is something that needs to be talked about. As an Indian woman who was and is considered "dark", MY CHILDHOOD WAS HARD! I grew up with family and friends that would constantly tell me not to play outside or that I disappeared in the dark if the lights were off. I felt unnatractive and my self worth was terrible. At least now I'm older, I know how to respond to such comments and educate people, but hearing these mean words as a child could really traumatize you and your outlook because it's something GOD BLESSED YOU WITH and something you cannot change. And it starts sooooo young....I've seen friends of mine who became new parents asking their healthcare team if their child, who was suffering from jaundice, would become darker if they went ahead with the treatment....like isn't your baby's life more important?....ugh its sooo bad.

I really feel for the Jo Malone founder. she had no involvement with the company anymore yet people assumed it was her fault and comment bombed her. I know it was just a misunderstanding of the public but that must have really hurt her, especially after all she survived. glad she cleared the air and stood up for John tho. what they did to him was so shitty.

It's like trying to trademark 'sunscreen' or 'lipstick'

So the ideology of having a lighter whiter skin propagated by Fair & Lovely in India comes from a very deep rooted mindset that was established in the minds of Indians during the British colonial rule in India. We were shamed for our brown skin, made to feel inferior for our skin color, being called curry skinned, etc were a few things said to us. That’s how we grew up hating our skin color and wanting a whiter complexion to feel better about ourselves and to fit in as per the western beauty standards. Just sharing the story around fair & lovely.

My dear... You absolutely do not look like crap!! (If I could only look like that when I don't feel well...) So glad to start my Sunday with James & a juicy informative video. (Espically about Joe Malone) Hope everyone has a beautiful Sunday & a great week!💜💜

Given Jo Malone is owned by Estee Lauder, no surprises here.

Hi, greetings from México, love your videos and the whole investigation behind them, I listen to you while working and the many times I catch myself making faces while hearing to this whole trademark 😱 woow. This remind me of the time Disney try to trade mark “Día de Los muertos” for the “Coco” movie or that time a restaurant in London tried to trademark the word taquería 🙄 Baffled. Keep the excellent work. 👍🏼✌🏼

Ugh, I recently splurged on my first Jo Malone fragrances, only to discover that they only last like 20 minutes on the skin. Now I hear this. I think I'm going to see if I can return.

I hadn't heard of the Jo Malone situation either! Granted I'm not their target audience but it's insane how I hadn't even heard it be mentioned anywhere! Thank you James 💜

Thanks for this James. I think it’s a bit of a beauty industry dirty little secret that Jo Malone etc aren’t owned by the founders. I feel they become diluted versions of their original loveliness-Lauder, I'M LOOKING AT YOU!

Unfortunately until the "standard of beauty" changes within culture there will always be brands that will make and sell these types of products. I am the child of Italian immigrants. My mother is 1/4 French, which is where I get my fair skin tone and grey eyes. I remember going back to Sicily for a visit and my Nonna (rest her soul) covered me in baby oil before sending me outside to play so that my skin would "darken". I was a tomato in about 15 minutes...It was horrible and my folks were pissed!

This was such an interesting video, thanks James! I'm from Malaysia and remember growing up seeing Fair & Lovely ads on TV, and they absolutely were about lightening the skin. The ads were super cringey and vomit inducing, always revolving around a girl who is all sad because guys don't look at her or something until she uses Fair & Lovely, becomes several shades lighter, and then all the guys fall in love with her. Urgh. 🤮 I'm not sure if this brand is still around in Malaysia - because I don't watch TV anymore LOL (and I live in another country now)

The pimple patches one is a ride I wasn’t ready for🤣

Please do a part 2 with the other 3!! I loved this 😍

I remember hearing about the "Glow" and lovely rebrand, and personally: too little, too late. I agree that it's the same concept, same products in slightly different packaging to continue profiting. This doesn't address the historical impact of this shitty company that impacted me personally and many others besides growing up in Pakistan my entire life, before I even understood it was about my skin color. I was "gifted" beauty creams from this brand by colorist relatives that were trying to lighten my skin in the name of success, marriage, and beauty since I was six. It's utterly despicable that this company still exists at all and is a huge profit earner for Unilever- can you imagine if they endorsed the same brand and message and ads in countries like the UK or the states?? This is truly capitalising off of nations that have such a serious colorism problem in society like no other and it's disgusting.

You wearing Cloak makes me so happy! Two of my favorite KZfaqrs combined!

The Jo Malone thing is so upsetting. Honestly if you don’t think the ad is suittable for global markets why hire the artist as a global embassador from the first place？and what were they thinking when they just change the actor without telling John Boyega. Did they think people just would not notice...? I would not be buying from this brand again🙄

As a Pakistani, I’ve been around fair and lovely my whole life! My mum would even use it! And when I would go to visit Pakistan, I’ll come across all these ads that were extremely problematic! And they were everywhere! And I mean everywhere, the ad will be on tv every bloody 5 mins, posters on walls in the street, all over the shops, etc! Unfortunately there is such a bad culture of lightening skin because apparently if you have light skin your better than everyone! In my family I’m the lightest and everyone would always compliment me and not so much my sisters who are a bit darker even though my sisters are so much prettier than me!

you don’t look like crap James! But I hope you feel better soon 💕✨

This literally touched my heart hearing you talk about the unfairness towards POCs.

“Perfection doesn’t exist” Love that! I’ve been trying out a new facial oil and started breaking out and found a calming cream that suits my sensitive skin.Period! Enjoying this content🫰🏻✨ Happy hours ahead 💙

I completely forgot about John Boyega x Jo Malone! Poor John, he's one of our finest actors but this isn't even the first time there's been controversy regarding him being removed from Chinese marketing, it's happened for movie posters as well

I'm so excited right now because I have the same Cloak hoodie! I knew we had something special. This isn't the first time I've seen you west something that I also had to have. This is why you're my favorite skincare person 💖

I love hearing about things/stories that aren’t well know over here in the US

Sounds like Stryx tried to trademark a commonly named thing like Kim K. tried to trademark the word Kimono for her shapewear brand…she ended up changing the name 🤪

I would never have guessed someone was trying to trademark "pimple patches ". Like wtf? I googled it just now out of curiosity and literally 12 different brands of pimple patches came up. Lol

That last one reminds me of Kim Kardashian trying to trademark Kimono lol In other news, I've decided I'm going to trademark spaghetti and I'm going to send cease and desist letters to all the restaurants in Italy. They're now no longer allowed to use the word spaghetti, they must use the term Italian noodles now 😂

Great research, James! I love your videos!!

ugh as an Indian American i know of the colorism in the culture.... skin barrier function? please. Fair And Lovely's product has always been about making money off the insecurities that colorism causes

Hello James. Thanks for bringing this story to light. Since I live in Brazil it would take a long time for me to learn about it. As you said, I think Jo Malone when I think about British perfumes. They are extremely elegant and don't bend to follow trends. What they did with the original author of the advert is disgusting, but it is well known how people of color are viewed in East Asia 🧐 and I believe that's what motivated this BS.

I had not heard either of these stories. I'm glad you brought them to my attention!! I agree that attempting to trademark something as universally used as pimple patches was foolish at best. I think they realized how foolish they looked and realized they had little to no chance of succeeding, so they backtracked and tried cleaning up their mess.

I remember when John Boyega’s Jo Malone ad debuted. It was so good! Easily one of the best fragrance ads I’ve ever seen if not the best. I was really excited for him, especially because I knew that he’d had a rough experience with _Star Wars_. I was so angry and disappointed at the disrespect the brand showed him.

Hello James, what are the small pink things you always put in your hair to keep it away from your face, and where can I find them? Thanks!

13:33 I remember when pimple patches only came in cute shapes and from Asian countries. And they were called pimple or acne patches. Only recently have I seen them be called blemish patches.

The ‘Fair & Lovely’ cream is such a foreign concept to me as a very pale skinned westerner. Myself and others of my skin tone are over here bronzing to have a more sun-kissed look while people with naturally gorgeous tanned skin tones are lightening? I guess I Can see if you are darker skinned with hyper-pigmentation spots, to use this on the darkened areas to even the skin, but for your whole face? Stop! You’re beautiful, and you don’t need to change!!!

That cica pair cream you use at the end must be great! I have really badly dry lips due to neurodermatitis at times and the lip balm from that line is the only thing that helps. Thinking about trying the cream as well

Please do a video with Leeja MIller who is a US lawyer/you tuber, it would be fascinating to see you both talking about this subject of trademarks etc

So a cease and desist letter isn’t technically taking legal action. It basically is a letter asking someone to stop doing something with an indirect threat that they *could* or *might* take legal action if they don’t stop doing that thing they don’t like. It’s often a fairly empty threat in circumstances like this and are kind of just scare tactics. I’m cases where there is actual copyright or trademark infringement they are used as a warning that gives that other party a chance to take their products or whatever off the market that might be unknowingly infringing one someone else’s trademark or copyright. You don’t need to file anything formally or anything to do a cease and desist and they don’t necessarily mean something is going to be formally filed but it’s kinda just a warning that something could be.

The last story kind of reminded me of when Kim Kardashian tried to trademark kimono 🤣 And while I was writing this, I just remembered how an American tourist kept saying gracias to a guy in Morocco. After all, if we're not from the USA, we're all Mexicans 🤣

So I don't know law, BUT I think I know how they are saying they haven't taken legal action. They sent out a cease and desist letter, which technically is not a legal action, but it is a letter stating that you would take legal action if they don't comply with what you're asking in the cease and desist. A cease and desist ORDER is a legal action, but a cease and desist letter is not. It's basically like a copyright claim, its not a legal action within itself, but it is the promise of intent of taking legal action if not complied.

John Boyega's gotta be one of the most underappreciated actors. I'm still mad about Star Wars underutilizing him.

Ahhhh I LOVED attack the block

I remember seeing billboard and tv ads for fair and lovely (and similar products) in India, and as a very fair ginger I was so perplexed lol. Everything was opposite of what it's here in the west, where everyone wants to tan.. One skincare seller tried to sell me a product by saying "it'll whiten your skin" and I just blurted out "does it look like I need to be more white?!" lmao. Whole new world. Many, many years ago.

I just spent the last 4 hours watching you and realized I didn’t subscribe! But I am subscribed now and I just love your videos on skincare! I’m a total skincare junkie and I’ve been shellacking my skin since age 12 😂😂😂 my husband says I could open a small boutique with all the skincare products I have 😂😂. LOVE your content and you make me laugh 😂❤

Stryx probably needed the publicity!

They have no legal standing with a pending trademark. Furthermore, the trademark office does research on similar products on the market if such already existed, the trademark would more than likely be denied.

Stryx trying to trademark Pimple Patch reminds me of The Fine Bro's trying to trademark React back in the day

Stryx’s founders, and especially their attorneys, are completely incompetent. If they had truly done their due diligence, which should’ve been done in the research and development stage, they’d have had the clear information available about the widespread availability and use of blemish patches. Ridiculous, and I don’t buy the backtracking.

Even in the arab world “fair and lovely “ was known too even my mom told me to use it to have a brighter skin at a young age as an Arabian black girl:)

What Jo Malone did was appalling, but I have to say, I have no idea how he made Peckham look as lovely as he did. That's a talent, but also if you've come from somewhere like Peckham it's deeply personal and you absolutely cannot wholesale that.

I still don’t shop the Jo Malone brand because of how evil that event was lol. It’s just so disrespectful of artistry and blatantly racist.

i unironically used fair and lovely for hyperpigmentation on my face and and i thought that was what everyone else was using it for too.

“And you can see here that I’ve picked at my skin because I thought a tiny piece of fluff was a blackhead I couldn’t get AND you can see that I’ve picked at my skin here because I’m a fucking idiot.” Me talking to my cat or bf on FaceTime every other night 💀

My brother has a saying: you can never trust business people to make good business decisions. I've found his saying to be true on most occasions.

Daughter of a (US) attorney: a cease and desist letter is basically just a “hey we would like you to not to this” letter. You can freely ignore them. Lots of businesses (over)use them because they are intimidating and instead of paying for a whole lawsuit, you’re just paying for a lawyer to write a strongly worded letter.

the stryx thing reminded me of kim k trying to trademark “kimono” 🙄🙄

So typically yt of stryx to claim that someone owes them education and forgiveness. Do the work yourselves, the info is available out there! No one owes you education, conversation, or forgiveness. This wasn’t the case of making an honest mistake, but a case of entitlement. They didn’t bother to do their due diligence because they’re yt men from America. Their IG is also gross. Posting BIPOC to seem diverse, when they’ve shown their true colours by their actions.

Attack the Block is a SICK film. So good. Woah that is so shady of Jo Malone. Knew there was a reason I didn't like them lol

I had such a hard time in the US trying to find skin lightening products in 2019 after my 2nd child stopped breastfeeding. I had alot of dark spots and discoloration on my face, which commonly happens during pregnancy, and I also wanted to try to lightening the dark skin on my armpits. It was a challenge trying to find products because selling them is seen by many retailers as promoting colorism. These products have many uses and should NOT be banned!

I love that you spoke about fair and lovely! Their advertisements were just wrong.. I once looked at the back of the tube and it just looked like some zinc oxide and a stabilized form of vit c 😂 Idk why they'd advertise it that way though.