Nothing wrong here. Guy with big gun goes first. Pretty basic stuff, unless the airliner is considering an interceptor role.
@themagicshortbus17154 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@Douglas.Kennedy4 жыл бұрын
I'd pay extra for a passenger flight with missiles. That'd be worth a window seat as well 😆
@epicscratcher51624 жыл бұрын
Roger roger
@pvtsnoballz4 жыл бұрын
I don't see any missiles or bombs, not sure they're gonna intercept anything *Very easy to miss the fins just barely peeking out*
@BEAR-lw6mh4 жыл бұрын
pvtsnoballz you can briefly see what look to be sidewinders under the wing on the inner wing pylons
@MilitaryNews124 жыл бұрын
Landings are perfect. Great pilots.
@user-ug7op9vr4f4 жыл бұрын
やっぱりF15j戦闘機はかっこいい😁👍 色が最高、とても早い、アクロバット
@igu63637 жыл бұрын
修学旅行で沖縄行って、帰る時に奇跡的にスクランブル発進見れた...
@user-oo4pg6lb2k4 жыл бұрын
スクランブルはないほうがいいんですけどね!まぁ見れたのはいいですね!
@user-dx2in7mo5j4 жыл бұрын
沖縄の人からするとそんなの奇跡的でもないよ。残念なことだけど、スクランブル発進は結構よくある
@user-qs5lp2sb9r4 жыл бұрын
@@user-dx2in7mo5j でもそれわざわざここで言う必要アル?
@tekashi14944 жыл бұрын
たまねぎ 事実言ってるだけで別によくね
@user-nz2ti3gt6u3 жыл бұрын
Tekashiをかし ぐっと数みな。多いホゥが正論だよ
@user-km9qm8pp5r4 жыл бұрын
着陸するときの最後まで前輪あげてるの面白い
@Papershields0014 жыл бұрын
On a civilian/military airfield with Alert fighters, the controllers and the F-15 crews have to practice shutting the civilian stuff down to launch the alert. To me that actually looked like a pretty minimal disruption of the field time wise. The same is true on a military field actually. If the Alert fighters are scrambled everything else stops.
@user-qb5ft5pl8g4 жыл бұрын
F-15かっこいい
@user-lz3oe1sm3c4 жыл бұрын
1年の時にスクランブルみてたな~
@user-wu2jl7vf6c3 жыл бұрын
素晴らしい
@hohohokoko63513 жыл бұрын
1:25ここ可愛い
@samsstudio61565 жыл бұрын
Here's the English comment thank you very much
@joesmith3894 жыл бұрын
What does “violated violation measures” mean? That makes zero sense.
@tonynsx4 жыл бұрын
Joe Smith I’m assuming it means some aircraft entered the airspace without permission, and they’re scrambling fighter jets.
@joesmith3894 жыл бұрын
Steve Quist Lol I was thinking the same
@karlinachen63254 жыл бұрын
same with me. i m a bit at loss as well lol. they should use "scramble procedure" instead.
They can violate the run way at anytime that's if there isn't any inbound coming in to land. They have priority especially if a jet from another country is in their air space without notifications.
@Chirp_Fest4 жыл бұрын
Launch maverick on the alert 5
@76mrvitamind4 жыл бұрын
Underrated tweet detected
@MiguelHernandez-tz4ml4 жыл бұрын
Maverick hesitated on launch, damn it Maverick!
@keiko9094 жыл бұрын
Cats three and four are broken sir....
@stephenburnage76874 жыл бұрын
Totally misleading title. This is simply a joint use (Civilian + Military) runway. Many of them around the world - especially in Norway. The military get priority use of the runway when required.
@tomdolan97614 жыл бұрын
Many in the US also....Honolulu and Fresno come to mind
Poor title, but I’m assuming an aircraft violated Japanese airspace and this is a defense scramble.
@enshuhana3 жыл бұрын
泣けてしまう
@alphatango44474 жыл бұрын
Safety of the country takes priority over normal arrival and departure, only aircraft in grave emergency has priority over fighter scramble
@user-dl2qv7nm8k6 жыл бұрын
かっこいいなー
@oldthudman4 жыл бұрын
Like us, they have fighters on standby 'alert' to investigate airspace incursions.....Nothing wrong!
@clee67464 жыл бұрын
Every word is in English but it's so difficult to understand.
@Resistculturaldecline4 жыл бұрын
Only thing wrong that I see, is it took them way too long to get on the wings, if that was an actual emergency. Roll swiftly to the runway, straighten out and light the burners. Took well over 2 minutes to clear the hangar, roll 250 meters to the runway and get the gears up.
@ISAFSoldier4 жыл бұрын
Looks like this squadron shares the tarmac with a civilian international, probably making absolute sure the civilians were in holding pattern.
@user-ym1xf6pr7g7 жыл бұрын
カックイイ
@ravigupta75354 жыл бұрын
Please correct the titles..
@dwightstewart71814 жыл бұрын
No violation here. They both stopped at the runway threshold marker (at 0:42), obviously waiting for clearance from ATC to enter the runway. They then paused on the runway (at 1:08), waiting for clearance to takeoff. All perfectly normal for any aircraft.
@mrdriver29884 жыл бұрын
Why did they violate measures. I dont think a jet airliner are design for fast interception.
@israelhurd30434 жыл бұрын
Did you know that no F-15 has been lost in combat are they are against another aircraft
@GHustle44 жыл бұрын
Same in Jacksonville, FL fighter jets whether it be practice or real time civilian planes stfu and wait
@johnathan729844 жыл бұрын
Double negative means they followed the rules
@user-dv2is5nu2v5 жыл бұрын
F-15を200機近く運用できとることが驚き。
@shekel55684 жыл бұрын
THIS TITLE GOT MILLION VIEWS. I have to Rethink HOW "SEO" WORKS.
@tysoncott74024 жыл бұрын
Fighters get priority
@bestestusername4 жыл бұрын
Fighter planes should get priority what if they going to a real situation, air controller should notice and stand down airliner u til fighters clear
@sherdil37174 жыл бұрын
Thats what happened
@dwightstewart71814 жыл бұрын
No violation here. They both stopped at the runway threshold marker (at 0:42), obviously waiting for clearance from ATC to enter the runway. They then paused on the runway (at 1:08), waiting for clearance to takeoff. All perfectly normal for any aircraft.
‘Violated Violation Measures’ is a double negative, so all was good in the Violation world!????
@avenger35763 жыл бұрын
部隊マークが無いのはIRAN明けすぐにアラート待機についたから?
@CallsItLikeISeizeIts4 жыл бұрын
As they shout Banzai, Bonzai
@myranfox38734 жыл бұрын
I doubt very much the Airline Pilot complained. Got a front row seat to a show!
@JoeSmith-iv3sf4 жыл бұрын
Exactly, highlight of his week! One of very few jobs in the world that is jealous of someone else's job for a brief moment.
@chrisclark71814 жыл бұрын
Surely a violated violation cancels out so as you were lads.... ?
@kusadakusao23837 жыл бұрын
アプローチ中のスピードブレーキ展開の実施未実施は統一されてないんですね。
@Disl3cic4 жыл бұрын
Get em boys.
@fcwgsvfmjbgq3214 Жыл бұрын
自衛隊の皆様、ありがとうございます。❤
@user-dv2is5nu2v5 жыл бұрын
那覇はAIM-7も搭載してスクランブルするんだ?
@nicholasselvaggi544 жыл бұрын
Monday on ABC News: In other news, We apologize. We've taken down the report we aired on Friday as the two planes were actually United States Air Force fighter jets taking off in Kentucky. Also, the other plane taking off was an Air Force refueling jet. There were no violating violations. The only violators who were in violation Friday were ABC news. We will still keep our jobs and continue violating, and then apologize later. Back to you, Bob.
@edwardmickelson29124 жыл бұрын
How did this get 2 million views?
@jamesgoodman62434 жыл бұрын
Military air superscedes everything No Violation here at all.
@biggles96044 жыл бұрын
James Goodman remember this is japan
@biggles96044 жыл бұрын
@raiden z yes but the fighter pilots and higher-ups got in trouble for doing so, which was my pint sorry that it was unclear
@biggles96044 жыл бұрын
@raiden z english.ryukyushimpo.jp/2017/07/29/27402/ Seems like the fighter jets keep having problems and causing delays to civilian flights. I can't find one for the date that this video came out and the title and description of this video are translated to English so none of us really can know what happened in this video, if someone dose know as a fact what happened I'm all ears.
@dwightstewart71814 жыл бұрын
No violation here. They both stopped at the runway threshold marker (at 0:42), obviously waiting for clearance from ATC to enter the runway. They then paused on the runway (at 1:08), waiting for clearance to takeoff. All perfectly normal for any aircraft.
@adventurekid92424 жыл бұрын
This was the slowest scraaaaaaammmmble I have every seen. Real or on video... Nice video though...
@user-sh3jx9nk8y4 жыл бұрын
お勤めご苦労様です!!‼(*`・ω・)ゞ
@aljack19794 жыл бұрын
Obviously not that much of an emergency. The RAF QRF would have been at 60.000 ft whilst they are still sat on the ground 🤣
@darrellapple89804 жыл бұрын
Japanese Air Force fighters are housed at civilian airports ?
@infidel19934 жыл бұрын
Some are, or they are co-located with a civilian airport. Runways take up a lot of real estate and Japan has a high population density, with about as much landmass as California but more than 3x the people.
@Thursdaym24 жыл бұрын
No,, other way round. Civil aircraft use military airfields.
@nhkkouhikari49254 жыл бұрын
緊急出動も忘れずにね。
@amrs73393 жыл бұрын
COOL!!
@LostAnFound4 жыл бұрын
Scramble!
@red_fox11404 жыл бұрын
So wats violation?
@tombrown66284 жыл бұрын
Can’t understand what’s going on with this?
@texjapcowboy1323 жыл бұрын
Naha Airport is used as both commercial and military. This is an air force scramble to intercept Chinese "unknown" intruders. There is nothing wrong at all, but some pacifists, so-called "Left-wing (pro-China) Communists" claim "it's a violation of the constitution article 9". lol
@user-km9qm8pp5r4 жыл бұрын
中射程ミサイルも積んでるだと
@Hovermaster4 жыл бұрын
We let the Japanese have those? What were we thinking?
@user-jd2xr4sj8d4 жыл бұрын
オタクの聖地
@engine19873 жыл бұрын
リーダー機のテンション上がってるw
@user-vl4go1eb3f8 жыл бұрын
いきなりスクランブル出たら管制官も大変だな 民間機とかいるととくに
@YT-wl8ts7 жыл бұрын
H Honda 軍民共用のところって自衛隊が管制してるんじゃないっけ?違うっけ?
@user-jf4kk2if6t7 жыл бұрын
高橋優介 那覇の管制は国土交通省です。
@YT-wl8ts7 жыл бұрын
かりゆしエア -ヒコーキ・アイランド- はい、知ったかぶってすいません。
@user-vl4go1eb3f7 жыл бұрын
かりゆしエア -ヒコーキ・アイランド- じゃ那覇の管制官は優秀な人ばっかなんだろうね
@cashy_91037 жыл бұрын
民間機より、自衛隊機を優先するそうです。
@kenclark98884 жыл бұрын
How can you violate a violation? Alert launch has priority duh!
@flameout123455 жыл бұрын
He violated the violations that violates the violated?
@iwishyouwould17815 жыл бұрын
I feel violated
@mikeburkitt52934 жыл бұрын
Correct
@thetycoon19473 жыл бұрын
You got a gun, you get to go first. End of discussion. 😇😇😇