😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

😅😅😊😊😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

When a player like Jaysuriya is on the other side, 400 is also not enough man. He was a nightmare..

​@@samarpitsinghrathore7775Aravinda Da Silva wasn't anything less than jaysurya

240 also defend by indian team but not by Pakistan team

I still dont understand why both these greats averaged so low in ODIS. Jayasuriya around only 28-29 and De silva 34. Jayasuriya should have averaged well over 40 and Desliva near 50 the way they played

Not only srilanka but best among the world

@@nazaar-e-awadh8475 🤣🤣🤣🤣 he was great but stop exaggerating

@@nazaar-e-awadh8475 One of the best among the world. And second best batsman for Sri Lanka after Sanga.

@@kuls43 sorry bro, he was way ahead then Sangga.....With all due respect to Sangga

@@kunalsandilya6034 feel pity on your analysis.

I still dont understand why both these greats averaged so low in ODIS. Jayasuriya around only 28-29 and De silva 34. Jayasuriya should have averaged well over 40 and Desliva near 50 the way they played

​@@Deira854Sanath Jayasuriya sir had more than 42 duck outs. Mostly that may be reason for low average.

❤

Appreciate and love from SRI LANKA.

Goose bump moments

I still dont understand why both these greats averaged so low in ODIS. Jayasuriya around only 28-29 and De silva 34. Jayasuriya should have averaged well over 40 and Desliva near 50 the way they played

@@Deira854 Sri Lanka gained test status in 84. Though they were talented they didn't have the experience of playing elite cricket and what it takes to win. For example any one that plays county cricket, state cricket australia etc is taught at a young age about staying in the wicket and that a 100 is the ultimate goal. Those early days the Lankan batsman didn't pay heed to statistics or knew how to build centuries. They were plenty of times Aravinda would go berserk in his 30s so as to improve the team scoring rate and give up his wicket. Plus Sri Lankan batsman/fans (used ) think attack is the best form of defence. The turning point imo was Aravinda playing county cricket in 94 and there he learnt that centuries and staying in the wicket matters over style. I think Aravinda, Arjuna, and Sanath were far mole talented than Sanga and Mahela. The reason Sachin is so good is cos he has Gavaskar to emulate, the Aussies had Bradman and others etc. or Aravinda and Sanath they didn't have anyone in Sri Lanka , and I think they all idolized Gary Sobers and Viv Richards.

What you call "Power play" today, is actually the fielding restriction of not keeping more than 2 fielders outside the 30 yards circle, and those were enforced in the first 15 overs of one day cricket, in those days. In fact Jayasuriya's biggest claim to fame in cricket, is his ruthless utilization of these fielding restrictions, particularly during the late 90s.

​@@Deira854 Jayasuriya ended his career with a career average of 32, and bare in mind that his career only took off in the late 90s, by that time he had already played close to 100 matches, with an under 20 career average. From 1996 world cup onwards, his career entered a different phase.

I still dont understand why both these greats averaged so low in ODIS. Jayasuriya around only 28-29 and De silva 34. Jayasuriya should have averaged well over 40 and Desliva near 50 the way they played

One thing seems true. From 1990s generations SOME batsmen from all teams have surely found easy ways to play only on Ind, they make stats, create records, get into the form lost, perform well only on Ind. Unfortunate thing is, this is still TILL DATE. More unfortunate is, with the interference of corporates ruling cricket im Ind exclusively along with BCCI's and poor team selection, always Ind is suffering across formats. This is impacting IPL mostly played on our soil, becoming easy for all foreign players and are taking on us with ease, be it bowling or batting. These days our batsmen are producing more results, but bowlers are not selected wisely. Everywhere there is politics ruling. Our selection has always been poor, lots of politics. Good lot amount of worthy players out of 140 Cr population, hardly we see allrounders in team selected. If u take a WestIndies, Aussies, SouthAfrica, England, NewZealand, SriLanka, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh also they still can bowl using potential 7 bowlers who can manage the entire match. This is also a fate our Ind suffering from. These days I noticed Ind ARE NOT ASKED TO CHASE while they lose toss on any team, entire world knoes Ind can somehow chase these days. Also ICC should make sure to include 3 Tests, 5 ODIs as mandatory thing even though 3 to 5 T20Is are scheduled in a bilateral series. This will save Tests and ODI formats also. Recent Asia Cup is conducted only in T20I format, this is bad.

@@Deira854 jayasuriya's batting avg is 32 in ODI's not 28-29 get you facts straight. Secondly in those days opener with the avg of 30+ was considered good.

@@arslaanpasha3334 ok but 32 is not good either, also are you kidding? in those days lara was averaging near 47 and Sachin around 44. in 1980s Viv Richards was averaging close to 50 in ODIs so no, average of 32 is below average and I just checked, in the 1990s, Jayasuirya average 28, in the 2000's he improved to make it 32

@@Deira854 adam gilchrist is a great opener. His avg in ODI is 33. So he's a flop noe?

Manuel Fernando I went for a supreme as aravinda ❤️❤️

It's not just about the Kookabura's of just these two special former entertaining super cricketer's but the entire Kukaboora fraternity owning batsmen were on the top of their games man..following next to kukaboora were gray nicolas fraternity & MRF.

I still dont understand why both these greats averaged so low in ODIS. Jayasuriya around only 28-29 and De silva 34. Jayasuriya should have averaged well over 40 and Desliva near 50 the way they played

@@Deira854 kyu copy paste kar raha h comment bhosdiwale?

@@Be_happy3010 teri mummy ki gand jo mari

​@@Deira854they played in a different era man. Aravinda debut in '84 and Jayasuriya in '89. Sri Lanka cricket didn't go professional until 1996.

Yeah.

Except south africa, and westindies, that time

Yes indeed he mentioned more than three times that 1000 runs weren't enough to defend again sl in the post match presentation .

Being a Srilanka fan, I would say that you have overrated the Srilankan team by overlooking the real scenario. Srilanka weren't that dominant in the year 1995 upto the early months of 1996 before the World Cup. You can check the records here www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/series/index.html In that period Srilanka emerged as a strongly competitive team. Immediately after the world cup 1996, Srilanka lost to India by 12 runs chasing only 200 runs in a Singer Cup triangular Series involving Pakistan also. In the final, Srilanka lost to Pakistan being all out for only 172 runs chasing 215 runs!!! In October 1996, Srilanka failed to qualify for the final of a 4 nation tournament involving Kenya, Pakistan & South Africa. Pakistan scored 371/9 when Afridi scored a century of just 37 balls and Srilanka lost the game by 82 runs & couldn't qualify for the final. In November 1996, Srilanka also failed to reach the final of the Sharjah triangular involving Pakistan & Newzealand. Srilanka failed to chase 206 & 169 against Newzealand and lost to Pakistan by 8 wickets scoring only 189. In the following year 1997, Srilanka performed well in the ODIs winning 3 trophies including Asia cup. But couldn't win a single away ODI series or test series, rather lost to Newzealand & West Indies. This video in which you have commented was from a 4 nation trophy where Srilanka miserably lost to South Africa twice including the final. Now, come to 1998. Srilanka failed to qualify for the final of triangular series in SA, involving Pakistan and South Africa. SL were all out for 105 runs against SA and for 139 runs against Pakistan and lost by big mergins. Lost the test series 0-2 to SA, lost the Nidahas trophy final to India chasing 307. Later in Nov 1998, SL failed to qualify for the final of a triangular series in Sharjah Involving IND & ZIM !!! Losing all 4 matches against IND and ZIM. In the second meeting against IND in group stage SL were all out for 98 runs chasing 181 runs!!! SL failed to reach the final of a triangular series in AUS in Jan-Feb 1999 involving AUS and ENG losing 7 out of 10 matches. In a match against England, SL were all out for just 99 runs chasing only 227!!! SL failed to reach the final of a triangular involving PAK and IND in March 1999, lost both matches against IND and one to PAK. SL were knocked out from the first round of the 1999 world cup in England . Though SL won the Aiwa cup in Aug-1999 but lost 3 out 5 matches failed to chase 211 & 241 against AUS & 271 against IND. In Oct 1999 SL lost the Sharjah triangular series final to PAK. Out of 3 games against PAK, SL lost 2 matches & one was tied. Chasing 196 SL were all out for 196, chasing 239, SL were all out for 121 and in the final chasing 211 SL were all out for 123 runs!!! So, in the period 1995 to 1999 except 3-4 matches I can't really see SL took Pakistan bowlers to cleaners or dominated anywhere except a few occasions in the Sub-continent.. So, you should come out of your fantasized and biased interpretation of how the SL team performed in the period 1995-1999

@@kishanarabi8818 real dominating performance was from 2000-2015

For Jayasuriya the field ""must have been 5metres more on all sides""!!!!!!!!!because he batted with "four hand's power" hitting above fielders,not letting to take catches!!!!!!!just as rules changed for Muralitharan ,for Jayasuriya also rules should have changed ,as I suggested!!!!!!!!!??????,😋😜😋😂😂

Jayasuriya the Silver Lion produced by Sri Lanka to world cricket and Aravinda the Golden Lion produced by Sri Lanka to world cricket. 🦁🦁🦁💪💪💪💪.

@@janindugalagama8723 Or I would say Aravinda de Silva the surgeon and Jayasuriya the butcher

@@ca2ca 👍👍👍👍💪💪💪💪!

& same was the story of our Australian wicket-keeper opening batsman champ "Adam Gilchrist"

That’s irrelevant to this video. And don’t compare Aravinda and Sanath with Shewag. They are 03 international players who have their own different personalities.

I still dont understand why both these greats averaged so low in ODIS. Jayasuriya around only 28-29 and De silva 34. Jayasuriya should have averaged well over 40 and Desliva near 50 the way they played

@@Deira854 bro do some research.

THATS IT! SUNNY is who Aravinda reminds me of. I was thinking for the longest time Aravinda's style is hard to categorise like "he pays like Sachin or Ponting or Sanga etc". Sunny Gavaskar is spot on. They both start and look unassuming but once the show starts the other team might as well go home.

VIK_BODY_BELD true

Sahi kaha bro arvinda is super star

Yes I agree,he can play very well in any time,even 1996world cup he made 100,one of best in the world

VIK_BODY_BELD yes you rit.

Wall of sl cricket batting he ws

Sachin is a joker

sachin is joker🤣🤣🤣

@@tamilannotnaadartamilanseb3593 mooduda pavadai soathukku sethavane

@@vijayakumarsundaram4605 moodra thevidiyaku porantha echai sanghi koodhi

@@nuwanperera2055 Yeah at age of 17 scoring 100 in England is joke to you n at the age of 18 scoring 100 in australia also a joke..

Yeah

Glad some remember it

Only Jayasuriya

🐷🐷🐷

Respect frm india

Yes defanitly..aravinda is the best batsman produced to the world by Sri lanka

Why have I never heard his name before

@@rummaniqbal3255 because u r mental

@@rummaniqbal3255 Because you are not a real fan of Cricket lol

❤❤

2012

@jinz0001 Haha yeah.. Sri Lanka made 5 straight finals from 2007 to 2014 2007, 2009, 2011, 2012 and finally winners in 2014 🇱🇰🇱🇰🇱🇰🇱🇰🇱🇰

Id say 1996 - 2015

Nishant Kumar t

Amar Samantray tx brother we feel the same as sri lankens

Why these two coach SLteam to rise to their 1990s glory ,,evrrybowlee had nightmares about sanath ,de Silva,Ranatunga,Attapattu',sangakkara,,,....among bowlers Vaas',muralitharan,,sanath,Fernando,malinga....,,,,,,why can not SL unable to redefine itself for today's conditions.........or these legends not helping their own erstwhile team???........

RAGHUH RAO they can help but political can’t allowed

I still dont understand why both these greats averaged so low in ODIS. Jayasuriya around only 28-29 and De silva 34. Jayasuriya should have averaged well over 40 and Desliva near 50 the way they played

@@Deira854 Because, Jayasurya many innings with low scoring. & For Desilva, he is a middle order batsman. So, that's may be the reason.

I still dont understand why both these greats averaged so low in ODIS. Jayasuriya around only 28-29 and De silva 34. Jayasuriya should have averaged well over 40 and Desliva near 50 the way they played

we use the word 'anichcha' .....nothing stays the same everything changes every moment.... west indies were unbeatable for over three decades .. enjoy the moment only without expectations that way you wont get disapointed... it's India's time now

Yeah. And a large part of the credit goes to the greatest Sourav Ganguly.

It's actually England's time now, but sure.

India haven't won anything major since they were sold the 2011 WC. Please come out of bollywood fantasy land.

@@NuXta yeah thats y they are on top of the rankings always

De Silva was not reliable

@@sugs1191 yes he was( what are u dumb or what

@@animallover2956 no he was not hence they called him "mad Max".

he came in a situation when iCC was not offering test matches to sl. When he was in brightest form he hasnt got many matches to ply.even sanath says that he was the greatest batsman for ever .

Aravinda debut before Sachin btw and was better to watch

Highway ? Couldn't get that name.