it's weird because doing that, as you say, probably made you want to be around him, but then not doing that would have played into his hands even more

My wife was in the same position as you, she rumbled him when as a porter he loved taking dead bodies down to the morgue in the lift

@@andrewmckenna4563 Did he really rape the corpses?

@@mushroomhead3619 You cannot rape a dead human being if looking at the legal definition of rape. Necrophilia is the correct term and I cant say or not say whether he undertook such a practice whilst working as a hospital porter.

That's disgusting that they knew and did nothing. They should all face charges! Everyone that knew including all the hospital workers not just the powerful people should say charges

@@jamesjackson5020 supposed?

@@jamesjackson5020 ah, right, I didn't realize, you're one of them.

@@jamesjackson5020 and for those who don’t believe in god or karma your resolution is meaningless. Those on the other hand who can assess things critically using evidence quite want there to be some form of justice and closure for the people who have come forward say they were abused by him (not everyone mindlessly believes everything they read or hear - although religion can be quite an appropriate example of that)

@@wakeyskate yeah I agree

@@jamesjackson5020 Karma is a made up word, same as God, they are nonsense words with no semblance of proof to them at all. Savile on the other hand, had plenty of proof to his, as you put it, "so called" actions. Take your head out of the sand and stop defending child molesters.

@Babblebrox One time in the late 80s Savile came to open an annual festival thing in my home town. I used to go to that every year, but as soon as my mum found out he'd be there that year she point-blank refused to let me go anywhere near it. She can't have been the only one getting such a strong negative vibe from the guy, he was so creepy.

Don't kid yourself, back in the 60s and 70s Saville was one of the UKs most popular DJs/Celebrities. Look back over old editions of the pop music weekly magazines, Melody Maker, NME, Record Mirror, available online and you will discover year after year he came top in national polls as the UKs favourite DJ. Jim'll Fix It was one of the highest rated TV Shows on a Saturday Night throughout the 70s. Personally I always thought he came across as a creep and a really crap DJ. I never understood his appeal but he was immensely popular back in the day. No revisionist history can change that. Fact is Jimmy Saville was Britain's most loved Paedophile beating Rolf Harris into 2nd place with Gary Glitter in 3rd and Jonathan King 4th. They were ALL very popular at some point in the 60s 70s and well into the 80s.

@@knockshinnoch1950 I can only speak for the 80s and 90s when I was growing up, and back then EVERYONE thought he was creepy and weird and couldn't understand why he was on TV so much. By contrast, Rolf Harris was genuinely popular and well-liked. That came as much more of a shock.

Everyone who knew him, Knew.

@@AlastairjCarruthers You're right about Harris if l had had a million guesses it wouldn't have crossed my mind he was a perv.

These things don't come out at the time. The BBC were aware of him and others ..

Good old BBC the bastards

And the culture was very different. What was acceptable behaviour in 1985 is not acceptable today. Can go to jail for kissing someone today for example. When I grew up rape meant rape. Today rape is dependant on someone's feelings about what happened, not objectively verifiable facts. Which is wrong for many reasons, especially that post-hoc buyers remorse often becomes "rape". 2 identical sets of events, 1 will be rape the other not because of a mental factor called "consent". There needs to be objectivity when it comes to law. Violence or coercion must be used, which is an objectively ascertainable fact. Refuse to see things another way. Things have swung too far in the wrong direction way beyond the point of balance. Sperm count is at its lowest in history. There is a war against men. Satanic forces are behind it. Collapse of Western society is imminent and inevitable now. When the law of the jungle is re established in the aftermath, everyone will be begging for real men to protect them from the horrors. The pendulum will swing the other way again. Neither of the extremes is good. Everyone has the responsibility to increase their IQ and spiritual awareness to benefit all of humanity; even one person waking up really matters.

And the Queen watches hiding her Son

What did he say when they asked what he does in the caravan? Additionally, wasn't there a political party or something that was for paedophilia? in the 70's?

Saville was questioned over the Ripper murders.

@@alexbowman7582and ripper was questioned over the fix it scandal

"Many a true perv wearing a vest"

and is that good or is it bad?

@@jamesjackson5020 It's neither. It's a statement which happens to be true.

The best liars are those that tell the truth.

@@raindog7733 What? That would just be people telling the truth. The best liars are psychopaths and sociopaths.

You're talking as if that excuses him from being a mega-nonce

@@MrEd94 No I'm not. I'm talking as if they wanted to excuse themselves for laughing at the time when they're taking it seriously at a later date. They could've at least kept the laughter in and acknowledged it afterwards like "we laughed at the time, but we didn't realise how serious it was back then", or something. As opposed to just cutting it out and acting like his statement was so obviously controversial. He's still a piece of shit.

@@SuperMisterKory actually I seem to remember Ian hislop didn't laugh at all at the time. I doubt Paul did either.

@@deanfowles3707 he said "nobody" not Ian or Paul.

@@MrEd94 I don't know how you got that out of what he wrote?

An interesting point.

What do you mean?

Maybe because of that documentary being advertised?

Is it only in the UK?

Its this new discovery plus documentary plugging their show and streaming service ....

No one listened to him because he was a crackpot. And still is. He wasn’t wrong about Savile, he just wasn’t credible.

Everybody knew about it.

he didnt "know" anymore than any of the people in this clip, or in any of the other compilations of jokes on here, did. he'll make out (or at least heavily imply) he somehow "knew" better than everyone else because hes a pompous self-important arse, but thats about it

No he didn't, John Lydon said just about everything about everyone in order to satisfy his own sense of self-importance by being 'edgy'. Savile just happens to be the one that he got right! He's also lied about being banned from the BBC about it, there's multiple YT videos of him on the BBC post-Savile interview. What he was banned from was 'live' BBC radio because he simply couldn't hold his ego together and behave himself which was leaving the BBC up for all sorts of court cases

Lydon looks like a lesbian woman now .. .the guy is a joke .. . .a bbc puppet !

Louis Theroux never stood a chance of getting it out of him, and he was hardly the only person to try and completely fail. His documentary is important in hindsight, now that he's dead, as a part of the historical record. I don't think anyone should denigrate him for trying and failing to go up against a wall of silence created by an evil genius with the most powerful people in the country at his back. And to be fair to him, after the first couple of interviews he stopped falling for Savile's game of hinting at something and then clamming up, and instead just focused on documenting how fucking weird and sad and lonely his pathetic sicko life was. Which I think is important. He took a lot from his victims, but every one of them is loved (at least I fucking hope they are), and Jimmy Savile wasn't. By anyone. Just celebrity 'love', screen 'love', the love of what riches and fame a powerful person can bring you. And that's meaningless. (If you hold the power to feed the hungry, house the homeless, cure the sick, etc. at an insignificant cost to you, you're not a saint for choosing to do so, just because choosing NOT to do so would be evil. It's a morally neutral act. Anyone who 'loves' you for that act is misguided and should instead devote their time to hating the people who put them in the position of needing charity in the first place. Obviously Savile thought the exact opposite. He donated millions over his fairly long lifespan.... but of course, he was rich enough that it was never an amount of money that he'd actually meaningfully miss or need. Not to mention donating much, much more of other people's money, often poorer people's, and taking credit for it because he pretended to run marathons to solicit the donations!) It was Louis Theroux that showed us beyond a shadow of a doubt that he had no family, no friends, not even a cat. Just little girls and boys who loved him before they knew him and then hated his guts the second he revealed the real Jimmy. All of his victims, the ones that survived anyway, will die surrounded by people who love them, hopefully without having even thought about him for years. He died alone, and instead of kissing his wife and children one last time, cracking a joke about her remarrying, and thanking his God for giving him this wonderful life full of love and joy and Earthly riches ('cause let's face it, you need SOME money, it makes the other two much easier to get and keep), his last act in this world was crossing his fingers. There's only one thing he was thinking about: himself. Specifically his worst acts. Even more specifically, he died SHITTING himself with terror about the Judgement waiting for him. Because he KNEW what he was (and I don't mean a nonce, I mean a sociopath. He was deeply religious and KNEW where God would put him if he died without remorse and without confessing. The survivors have the last laugh, and the ones who didn't survive are at least at peace. Savile died KNOWING, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that he was about to go to the lake of fire for Eternity. As wrong as Schadenfreude is, that's a comfort to me, and I wouldn't know that if I hadn't seen Louis Theroux's documentary on him. Sorry for the very long comment, this subject gets to me as you can tell, and I got ahead of myself.

Jimmy Savile was on children in need twice or three times in the 1980s....But the then chairman of the BBC Children In Need revealed after savile's exposure, that he actually banned savile from children in need back in 1998. Because of the rumours and suspicions that had been going around about Savile for decades. But he never told the other BBC bosses.

Terry Wogan should be credited for this. He was given the gig and refused to have Saville involved using the excuse that he wanted a fresh team. Terry had heard all the rumours and boxed clever even though Saville demanded to be involved. RIP Mr Wogan

@@stuartrichardson6928 Apparently terry wogan said in a interview after the savile scandal came out that when he and the daily mirror columist jean rook were one day sitting together having lunch in the BBC premises back in 1997. Savile was also there. And when they both looked at savile go into the loo. Rook turned back to wogan and asked him. ''when are you lot going to expose him'' ?....And wogan replied back to rook...''That's your lot's job''.

@Stardust sorry what do you mean?

why do you think they set it up in first place ? . .. yes , to get kids ...

So you do not see the irony of your comment? HIGNFY are discussing how the press are blaming everyone for their connections to Savile but themselves and you want to associate him with Thatcher and "the Tories". Political agendas make people buy in to any conspiracy theory. Benefit of hindsight is a fool's game.

the labourers were no different

In the caravan In the shed In the car In the van,,,,,

Don’t bring the Iron Lady into this you fucking peasant

I'm glad I don't pay t.v license no more

Sure, but they aren't wrong about other media companies. They are all corrupt.

"Permissive society," or not, the conduct you mention would still constitute Indecent Assault contrary to the 1956 Sexual Offences Act. And the age of consent has been 16 since 1885. It was probably convenient to brush this stuff under the carpet and pretend that "things were different then" (it looks like the BBC did), but actually, they weren't... There were laws in place to forbid this.

@@Radagast- yes but undoubtedly accusations were brushed off a lot more hence the pushback in certain movement I.e Metoo and such. Just because there were laws doesn’t mean people abided by them

@@Azoria4 I don't think that victims have it any easier, these days... look at the conspiracy of secrecy that protected Weinstein and Epstein, and continues to protect Epstein's clients [sic]. The point is that society had already acknowledged that these things were wrong and the evidence of that was the legislation that was in place. People were and are too cowardly to do what's right... they have the system they deserve.

@@Radagast- The most cowardly people were the ones he knew. He cultivated relationships with powerful people, who should have looked closely at the "rumours" around him. They chose to ignore anything negative about their acquaintances, and many probably still do. His victims were children, many have said they reported him to police but nothing happened; it might be coincidental that he knew some very senior police officers (and probably a few lawyers too). The victims didn't have the system they deserved, but they didn't have much power if those they reported to didn't take them seriously.

@@Azoria4 be nice if they did abide by the laws. Well nit all of the laws, don't know if it's true but apparently all black Hackney cabs should carry a bale of hay in the back. For the horse, a law that has never been repealed, allegedly. The source not the best.

If you watched Jim'll Fix it in the 80s he comes across as a creepy guy.

@shoaib btt I don't think the BBC is allowing Savile stuff out now - mainly coz they'd have to pay the family a royalty. It was out on DVD years ago tho.

@shoaib btt wow. surprised.

@shoaib btt actually that's a follow up documentary after JS died. The original When Louis Met, plus the Max Clifford one, are not on Netflix.

I remember watching that documentary when it broadcast - thinking what a deeply weird guy he was. Walked past his Glencoe house a few times - was covered in graffiti after the truth came out.

Awful woman

Esther Rantzen is constantly telling through adverts to out anybody who is abusing a child and rightfully so but yet she didn’t out Jimmy Savile despite knowing about his atrocious past.

@@chezzer58 I recon Jill Dando was going to blow the lid off the whole thing ......

Friends in high places springs to mind...

Tough. No integrity. She's a wrong un for that.

The guy was generating huge sums of money and viewers. Some of his shows got up to 20m viewers which is insane. People will look the other way in regards to despicable acts to not get thrown off the gravy train. Pure scum the lot of them.

It wasn't just their careers at stake, I expect some of them had children and didn't want the social services involved. He had friends in high places. They like them young. I KNOW.

Thatcher was a huge supporter and close friend of Savile's and undoubtedly knew. These people should be similarly posthumously investigated and held to account!

Even the Leeds Police covered up for him by not investigating accusations passed to them by the MET.........he must have had filth on the Chief Constable, I expect they were all up to no good together?

It's the NHS that should be looked into, the vast majority of his crimes came from the open access he had there

sAVILE = innocent . . . . .bbc = CRAP .

So is the BBC.

and so is Lineham ...look at how Twisted he is . . .a truly sick pervert ...!!

The Press have gone after people in many a vendetta.. but couldn't out this dude? Fgs... He minced on to our screens and my grandparents said" look at him ... bloody paedo"..It was that obvious. And he was creepy. Compare that to their coverage of that footballer who got 6 years jail for a consensual kiss with a 15 yr old ....unbelievable.

C O B B L E R S . . . . . . . !!!! !!! !!

@@krishnan-resurrection714 takes one vile individual to sympathise with another.

@@jh2419 ... Liar ....sleep well at Night ...

@@krishnan-resurrection714 troll. I have the medical records to prove it. My sister died you piece of filth. Always the wrong ones.

It is extremely unlikely that a child would be taken to and from theatre without being accompanied by a nurse at all times.

Lydon didn't say a bloody thing, and he wasn't banned from the BBC at all. The only thing he said is that he wanted to kill Saville, and a whole bunch of other people because he wanted so badly to be edgy and relevant, but never really was. Now, he's a bitter, sneering little goblin.

John lydon said it, and so did comedian Jerry sadowitz. The pair of them both banned and sensored..bbc radio wouldnt play public image records for decades. Sadowitz in particular nailed Jimmy's Jimmy's character down to a tee

@@nodiggity9472 he did mention on that interview that he had heard loads of rumours and that he was up to seedy activities. What more clarification do you want?. Unless he had solid evidence he couldn't just name the crimes outright, lydon already had an open MI5 file with his name on it after the sex pistols boat trip, so he had to be careful in what he said to a certain degree

Lydon was a fake ...a bbc puppet ...2 faced manipulator and Liar ...look at the clip of him now. . .Looks like a fat woman ...-the guy is a joke !!!!!!

Yep, this is the problem. I’m about the same age as her by what you say and nothing much was done about dirty old men, because they were men and women were just expected to stay away and protect yourself. I’m not saying it was right, it really, really wasn’t. But technically there wasn’t much anyone could do. Harassment laws were either non-existent or weak as a rich tea that’s been dunked 5 times. Women had very little protection or support. No one had any direct evidence of his abuse of kids, so what was anyone to do? Dirty old men who were creeps to women were tolerated and I guarantee they still are far more than most people realise because things haven’t changed all that much.

Well not really, l think many did get a weird vibe from him if not of pedo definitely something not right, l remember my dad saying one night in the very late 60s as he looked up from his paper and caught a glimpse of him on top of the pops l was watching, " why are old men like him in shows with teenagers in, what teenagers want old men around them specially that tulip ' thats what he called creepy blokes tulips, he had a way with words, he called Randolph Scott" that puff cowboy " because no matter how he got into a fight or had ridden 30 miles gallop thru a dust storm he always apoeared immaculately groomed hair brushed and combed clothes clean as a whistle and laundered somehow and the kneckerchief he always wore did look a bit camp the way it flared out by puff my dad meant any bloke super smartly dressed or effeminate. That was the 60s for yer. I dunno if it was because my dad had said that but as a 12 year old l began looking at Saville with more cynical a view up until then I'd thought him a bit weird or eccentric if l had known the meaning of that word then, but he also looked like an uncle of mine married to my mothers sister, who l always felt uncomfortable around as he was loud and looked a good bit like him he was a serial philanderer as l found out always knocking off women behind his wifes back and had tried it on with my mother and her other sister, slimy creep is the words l would have said then.

I didn't think he was a pervert ,but I do remember thinking he came across as a real busy with no obvious likeable qualities , and he liked hanging around with perverts ( Charlie)

In Rochdale it was an open secret that Cyril smith was a nonce. It’s perfectly plausible that their was an undertone in the country that a lot of people were aware of rumours.

Yes. Thousands upon thousands lined up to see his coffin in Leeds to pay their respect as it was put on display before the funeral. Church leaders, hospitals, charities, Leeds council, and the public were all mourning his death. Leeds was a sea of people all there for Jimmy. Funny how it's impossible to find these people now.

He wasn't universally loved. Nor by a long chalk.

I despise that phrase. That and 'banter'.

Saville actually had a house around the corner from Sutcliffe and a young girl was killed and found in the parkland behind Saville House, they knew each other .

@@tailorgreen5277 yep. Its an incredible coincidence.

Poisonous Daily Mail. Vile journalists.

Course they knew. Those at the top did. And it still goes on today. Horrible bastards.

No one ever mentions that, forget him "getting away with it".

Wow. Thankyou. Good point about hislop aswell. The fact these ppl had this platform and stood by and said nothing is indefensible

@@aquanefarious6258 Hislop has been sued many times for exposing people and lost, so if he said he never knew he most likely didn't he's a very honest bloke,. Dont disparage him because of Savilles evil.

@@biggusdickkus2956 Exactly this. Everyone knew it, nobody could prove it.

There's a difference between "hearing rumours" and "having evidence"

Maybe your aunt should have said something, more her responsibility as a nurse than Hislops.

He already knew some of the most senior police officers and politicians, so I doubt if it was looked into with great care on the first occasion. After that, it was probably something like, "This has already been investigated so we won't do it all over again". He had lots of money, knew some powerful people (police, politicians, lawyers, royalty, business directors, hospital managers, etc.), had built a profile as a charity fundraiser...

@@seegee9927 Charles was informed decades ago about savile by the secret service. Anyone who is befriended with the throne pretender is under close watch. Charles also had a friend who was a bishop .....he raped a boy and was convicted. yet charles sheltered him in one of his properties even knowing he was convicted. The rape victim committed suicide. .... let that sink in for a moment.

Mrs Thatcher repeatedly put Savile up for a knighthood and had it knocked back by the Honours Committee, until the last time - possible her resignation honours list, which must have different rules. Don't forget, he also had a Papal knighthood, which must have been approved by Cardinal Basil Hume.

Yes he ran one Hindley and Brady used to go to.

He ran the Mecca dance hall in Leeds and all his staff knew " he liked little girls"

How would you expect Ian Hislop to obtain more conclusive evidence of Savile's activities?

Trouble is, there's quite a substantial gap between 'rumours' and 'undeniable, concrete facts'.

Everything is a rumour until it's proven to be true. Short of Hislop walking in on Savile abusing someone I'm not sure what extra insight you expect him to have had?

I doubt either Hislop nor the most sued publication in the UK would shy away from printing anything. They regularly are critical of the actual government, the BBC & the royals, all of whom have a bit more influence than a DJ/TV presenter. I don't find the assertion credible.

Hislop probably heard more rumours than most people since the rest of the press passed stuff on to Private Eye that their own papers would not print. They were willing to take the risk of libel actions, but they needed to have SOME evidence to have a hope of defending themselves. The likes of Rupert Murdoch, Viscount Rothermere or Robert Maxwell had the wealth and journalistic resources to take him on, but for whatever reason were disposed to leave him alone.

routeman680 Graham Linehan, Irish comedy writer, a transphobe as it turns out. I think only top executives directly involved with Savile would have known about his disgusting abuse. When abuse happens on BBC premises, BBC employees only know about it if they’re also on the premises and in the same bloody area, either in the same room or in adjacent rooms. I don’t think Savile would have gone out of his way to make it known to a lot of BBC employees and people in general, funnily enough. Just enough for him to get off with his subtle hints to his behaviour.

What’s wrong with being a “trans phobe”?

@@syriacchristianity9007 The phobe bit.?

@@syriacchristianity9007 Yeah... what's wrong with an irrational antipathy towards people who aren't the same as yourself? The world's gone mad...

So you’re for giving children bunch of drugs and hormones when they show symptoms of body disphoria?

He's a comic genius and supports women

Was that dobbie 😭

That's what he's saying in the clip though, lots of people "knew", but there's a difference between "knowing" something and having evidence of a crime taking place and actually being able to do anything about it.

He's a pathetic little snake. "The press didn't reveal it either" he says, defending the BBC's silence - in full knowledge that the press desperately tried to reveal it but were legally challenged to not do so.

He didn't know, yet they heard rumours. Why did they not check them out? They harass all kinds of people when it suits them

What of sir starmer they are all in on it

I wouldn't say that necessarily. Damage limitation is part of public office and I think most MPs would want to give this a wide berth (having knowledge or not).

I study the bad man Crowley seems savile was his type . Why now we have evidence saville was york ripper he was in the same city as the murders lived 250 yards away . Why we moan of Andrew when charles ten times worse . We joined EU as of UK press black out over heath . He went to see if Sutcliffe ok he owed him so that's why Frank bruno went and did Jim will fix it he went in nut house after . Many kings liked young boys like Charles 1st maybe great reset planned another Charles then u need Leslie as we did the bugger not Cromwell irony to Scots Charles 2 was their assasin

The royals had their own nonce in the family. Probably more than one

eh?

I hear you're a racist now father

Yeah. It’s really weird seeing the descent into hatefulness and madness he’s gone down.

It was a pretty obvious threat. Savile couldn’t hide his anger.

Found it! It was definitely said in a threatening manner, but I wouldn't say Dee felt threatened by it.

@@ill_be_frank KZfaq

Dee is a little puff...savile would have destroyed him .... !!!

@@alanhargreaves-thevoiceofr2361How Dee isn’t a disabled 12 year old. The kind of people Jimmy liked.

Mcmartins is real lol

Woah....the fuck?

Found it?

dailymotion

Look up the original doc www.dailymotion.com/video/x6brsit

Underrated comment.

Now we pump these kids full of drugs and parents fears their kids may be gay are pushing those children into transitioning. What a fucked up world. He may of been cancelled but history will show he was right

good spot ...the whole situation is brain washing by yudischer 'elite' . . . .they stole our britain and replaced it with .. . . .. .

then he starts talking about twitter lol

Graham is consistent. Those sanctimonious witch hunters who have made his life hell are the ones feigning outrage at Jimmy Savile one minute and grooming minors, with their 'affirmation' the next. If a child is old enough to consent to puberty blockers in preparation for trans surgery, then what else is he/she/they old enough to consent to? Savile would be rubbing his hands at the chaos trans ideology has brought to safeguarding. Graham is heroic.

no , they are all masons . . . .. .all bbc. . . . .. .

Rest in piss

womp womp

What a joke and its not even funny

And your proof?

@@brucelamberton8819 The hundreds of photos of them together, walking, hunting, laughing. And the well publicised fact that Savile was actually called it to "counsel" Charles and Di before they separated. Do you think anyone gets that kind of access to the Royals without MI5 going through their life with a fine tooth comb? Every traffic ticket you've ever had is gone over. If he'd ever been to a union meeting or an antiwar march he'd have been blackballed but being a paedo just made him useful to them.

Cos rumours ain't evidence. He says that in this clip

Top coppers in their pockets. Savile even boasted of having a team of senior officers at his beck and call in a police interview. Rotten from top to bottom.

Who's to say he didn't? It's plainly obvious he had people protecting him, hence the allegations against him through the years ultimately going nowhere. How exactly can someone put out a story with zero evidence? You'd just get dragged through the courts for libel, and would ultimately achieve nothing. People don't generally care about protecting corpses though, so after he died it was only a matter of time before the truth came out.

@@BigDoniel it's called integrity and Hislop clearly has none are you honestly saying that through all those years, remember John Lydon eluded to it in '78, they couldn't find any evidence of his acts, witness statements etc.

probably cos it meant outing himself the fat dwarf

Because without any hard evidence or even any accusers at the time, there was nothing to investigate. Rumours are mere hearsay, and you can't base an investigation on hearsay.