“Amigo! Dios mio?! Vamos! Pendejo! Por favor? Pinche guey!” Just use those together or randomly at the beginning and/or end of sentences and you’ll be an honorary Raza !

Lmao true

Half a million Mexican Americans served in world war 2 unfortunately racist white people don’t give them the credit they deserve

who cares, USA won

If you want history read a book

@@inthedarkwoods2022 I agree. Just hilarious mission. It’s like Michael Bay directed WW2

Completely agree it’s like the battlefield F-18 Launch mission. The plane was already started and on the catapult 😂

As realistic as star wars epic

Actually, when it comes to the 2 carriers, that did happen. Capt. Vernon L Micheel successfully landed bombs on 2 Japanese Carriers, which led to their eventual sinking.

​@@pedroportillo1585not in single pass, IIRC. He made more than one flight on the first day.

​@@MoreFunization True, but I can let that pass for the sake of pacing. It’s still historically true that one person bombed 2 Japanese carriers in one day.

Wasn't it Dick best that scored 2 carriers?

@@pedroportillo1585 Im a little confused because supposedly Vernon struck the Akagi, but when reading up on the battle of midway it was only Richard Best and his two wingmen that attacked the Akagi, only Best's bomb hit which eventually sank the akagi. During the second attack of the day on the remaining Hiryu he would again hit resulting in him being responsible for sinking 2 carriers in a single day.

About 3-4 years before the air force was even created lol

Fr

Exactly but too bad they gave us this slop instead

@@patrickmontez6843limited budget and the technical limitations of the COD code itself. A realistic Midway naval air combat simulation would be very complex and probably beyond the scope of what COD producers were trying to do.

right. so why EA decided to give them awful dialogue like they were about to go on a joyride, idk.

@@patrickcannady2066 then they shouldnt have added a air combat mission. or they could have done what they did in earlier games which is to make you the gunner position. theres already a lot wrong with the game to begin with but idk. could of been a cool opportunity to give a little nod to Bruno Gaido

hard to not be heroic when you have no choice. You're fighting or you're going to jail. Plus it's easier to be heroic when you believe in the country you're fighting for. Unlike the degenerate country that is the USA today.

I respect your grandfather for his bravery and sacrifice in the Battle of Midway 🫡

@@michaelbriggs3787 His grandfather would kick all of our asses for what we allowe this country to become eight decades after all the bravery and sacrifices

cheers gramps.

@@CongressSux1776time for your nap grandpa

@@KRG30001 Right after I get done tucking your mother into bed, sonny.

the flight mechanics look like an arcade game just with better graphics lol

*playing pac-man in an arcade* hmm this is inaccurate, in reality a pac-man would not die from being touched by a ghost

Más de lo mismo ,

I have heard that perhaps one carrier did explode almost instantly due to a direct hit to the munitions depot, although I could be mistaken.

@noelivester7340 They were mid ammo switch. The admiral had previously ordered they arm the planes with torpedo's but then second guessed himself and said switch ammo. This process takes hours and as a result the carrier was a sitting duck when the American fleet found them. The explosion was even more intense because so much ordinance was on the deck when the dive bombers hit them.

Best is a real man?! I thought he's a fictional character from the movie "The Midway"

That's wholesome. 🥰

Nice

Somewhat the movie is more historically accurate than this

​@@Pearloryxinfinitely more accurate than this

Despite the over the top cgi it's was definitely an enjoyable movie.

and with bombs still attached... totally ridiculous.

Cool, you know stuff about planes and history. Here is your bit of attention from me. I hope you enjoy it cool dude.

the dauntless could out turn the a6m, a dauntless once shot down 2 of them and fought off multiple zeros.

@@coyoteduster8919 i can out turn an a6m in my honda odyssey

@@kiwami2321 dont be a dipshit kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rd9nbLaIlZeadmw.html

They could've at least made the plane have limited ammo somewhere in the thousands xd

Did you know that they sold this game as a "Totally realistic and historically accurate game?" That's why so many people throw shit at it, in addition to being a terrible campaign with terrible dialogue.

@@visibleDude7 Didn’t know that. That’s hilarious.

Haha that legit made me laugh hard af

Fucking cringe. This is a game, lots of people died for nothing with this “cool shit”

Yea, the Warthunder player in me was screaming at those parts. Found it funny how the backseater tells you to protect the bombers. Like dude, we're a bomber with a full load. Ain't no way we are catching any zeroes much less TURNING with them. Yea, I get it's a game. However, the devs could do better instead of being lazy. Just have the player swap between actual fighters that cover the bombers and then later in the mission swaps to the bombers to do the actual dive bombing. Plus, after they finished with their runs, there was no way in hell those bombers would stick around to a dogfight. Much less dogfighting while being in the middle of the Japanese fleet. They're bombers for crying out loud!

@@Killbird-gn5kf The Dauntless is no slouch in a dogfight. With enough energy you can surprise people.

@@dixievfd55 Yea, with enough energy going into a dive with the element of surprise. After that you cannot be in the fight with a zero. You lose 9/10 times in a sustained fight. Have you seen the turn radius for a fully loaded dauntless vs a zero? Also, it's just the insanity of having a BOMBER be used to protect another BOMBER from FIGHTERS.

They did

@@Alexzan220 with this? C'mon

@@Alexzan220 A dive bomber was dogfighting Zeros and his cockpit was open the whole time lol

@@tddog1992 lmao

​@@Alexzan220also a sbd bomber can't chase a zero that fast and can't catch up to it and also the pilot refiles the bombs in air lol very detailed 😂

They were actually responsible for a couple of air to air kills. Though that was when they finished their bombing runs.

SBDs were used as CAP during the Battle of the Coral Sea, with one pilot shooting down 3 Japanese aircraft in one 15 minute dogfight

@@nickrails Yeah but in the scene they are used as fighters and bragging about more zero kills. If they were flying f4fs or even buffalos itll be more realistic

Yeah but nowhere near like this

shut up bro

@@fooman530 stop ignoring what we've contributed to this country

@@t34esq im gonna touch you lil bro

I assume you mean USS Midway, because the carriers that were present during the battle have all long since either been sunk or scrapped. Which is a damn shame... USS Enterprise should've been a museum ship, damn it.

I was on that ship lol.

None of the US carriers in the mission still exist. The Hornet you may be referring to is an Essex class ship, not the Yorktown original that was in the mission.

@@HarrisonGoldfarbi didnt say it was that ship just reminded me of that tourist attraction

Did the WWII carriers have the catapults? I thought that was implemented onto carrier well after WWII. That was the first inaccuracy that stood out to me.

I mean, Vanguard as a whole is like History channel made videogame. There are better games if you aim for historicall accuracy, or atleast as best as videogame can get.

@@nicksignore8301 Yes, but it was very late in the war. At midway, none of the planes on any of the American carriers had any of the proper gear to use the catapults.

As an aviation fan, you should be cringing. The SBD-3 was a lumbering dive bomber, and in this instance it was used as a dogfighter and took on A6M5 Zeros, known for their high maneuverability, with three bombs strapped onto it. To call it Bullshit is an understatement.

@@shrk128 I agree. Also takeoff to formation to combat in 3 minutes. Quite impressive xdxd. Literally known as the Slow But Deadly

@@shrk128 leaving out the fact that at no time does anyone invert or even roll past 20 degrees to either side 🤣

​@@shrk128 And don't forget that the SBD did two bomb runs without coming back to the aircraft carrier for new bombs

@@shrk128 and you didn't even mention that the planes make the sound of the stuka sirens

@MonarchEXE How do targets that are set to strict rotating paths without deviation more threatening? The Fighters in that sequence in BF3 follow a repeating path, they are meant to fly directly into your field of view to be destroyed by either the fixed gun or guided missiles. Its a rail shooting sequence. No strategy required. They dont have AI beyond firing the occasional missile you have to flare at. If you choose to not destroy them and just keep flaring with the infinite supply of countermeasures they will endlessly repeat tailing and being directly in front of the plane until you decide to destroy them. It is basically a quick time event. You can receive damage in this Vanguard sequence because the planes can freely engage you at any angle, as can you. Its not a flight simulator by any means, but it is a gameplay section despite its strict linear set of events.

@MonarchEXE If you are being randomly taken out by anti air fire, or Zero fighters that's a fairly accurate portrayal of how perilous it is for pilots during WW2 lol. It also means you can fail. Admitting that the BF3 sequence is effective only once is not an argument for it's quality. You are basically saying it has almost zero replay value. Flashbacks in a story are not bad things lol, in Vanguard the flashback is meant to develop a character's personality like almost all the other missions in the game. It's a Ensemble cast. In BF3 it is a random mission meant to showcase frostbite's engine technology at the time. It's impressive to look at sure, but it is only impressive once and loses all novelty... If you like the spectacle on it's own that's fine, in Vanguard it is also very much Spectacle. But at least it is still just a bit more interactive and can be replayed without losing it's small gameplay appeal.

@MonarchEXE That's kind of realistic though. Japanese Zeros weren't built well and went down pretty easily

Well, I wouldn’t say Dull but Dog shit. They cant even get the combat sequences right. Even Model of Japanese Carriers are very wrong it’s not hard to find their accurate models. And what is 8 Nagato Class Battleships doing here? Nagato Class Battleships only have 2 Nagato and Mutsu. Japanese AA is too accurate and why the Main Character have to open the cockpit when Diving Bombing into the whore of AAs somehow didn’t recived any shrapnel from the AAs at all. I know that Japanese AA is not effective but it will definitely killed a person with its shrapnels.

@@tsuaririndoku You ever watch Paton? Inglorious bastards, saving Private Ryan… Hell almost every piece of WW2 media both in film and video games… Whatever their level of commitment to realism, fact or fiction they all suffer from inaccuracy… It’s impossible to get everything 100% right and sometimes getting things completely right is not always the goal. WW2 games, especially during their height of popularity featured many historical goofs. Copying from movies, featuring weapons, vehicles, enemies and settings that never existed or did but not in the ways depicted.

I was the same for a while, just wrote this one off but after playing it, it wasn’t too bad. It’s not the greatest but aright for killing a few hours

Not to mention polina raised the rank from private to lieutenant in one year

That is the only flying level on vanguard, it’s not the best of controls either.

in true Call of Duty manner, they rip off dialogue and scenes from Movies.

@@kristopherryanwatson yeah i agree

рядового Райана еще спасти на обратном пути на авианосец залетев во Францию )

Zeros didn't have armor.

Zeros didn't have armor or self sealing fuel tanks. Their only advantage early in the war was speed. If you could line them up in a sight, a short burst would either blow them up or send them to the waves.

Silent Hunter III

Yeah, there's nothing accurate about this. A Dauntless could never keep up with a Zero like it's shown here.