first!

Silly man; there's no Starfish in space.... *sips tea and opens latest edition of the Global Flat Earths monthly newsletter...*

Love u joe

@@rafanifischer3152 Just ask those who lived in Hawaii during the test. It knocked out their power grid and caused a statewide power outage on a clear nighttime sky.

Unfortunately NASA sucks at documenting things and not very good at keeping up with things and also securing things. There are actual fake shots in with the originals and such. Because they let things get wet, lost things and some things were handed out to press as part of packages for writing stories and articles. So some of it NASA did to themselves. But this is easy to understand. They didn’t think that years later people would think it had been faked. My uncle worked for NASAL So I know it’s not faked, but they where nerdy engineers that thought surly we’d be going to Mars and the moon regularly, not still sitting on earth and not even going back to the moon after the Apollo ended. It was unthinkable to them. Surly man would accomplish this by the year 2000 if not before.

I was going to........ Then I thought "that's too silly, even for here" Seems I was wrong (😉👍)

🤣

Duuude 1🤣

And, subsequently, Uranus.

@@T-800.. 🤣

Avery Brooks • hi from a former Iowa City resident. My sister still lives there though.

That's so cool.

@@gabor6259 Seen my comment, Kralik?

I worked in NASA GSFC's Lab for High Energy Astrophysics for many years. The older scientists were nice, but the younger scientists were completely full of themselves. You could almost see their heads swell when some news service interviewed them. Maybe life tempers us as we suffer the occasional failure and terrible personal losses that come with age.

Im more impressed with the Linux expert who came in and just coded a new set of drivers for the contraption. Jk but still it not every day you see something like that...

You still think the sky is real? is one of my favourites.

@@MediHusky EVERYONE knows that the Earth isn't real!

@@cxk7127 You still think that's air you're breathing?

@@MediHusky breathing is not real! 😂

It's all a simulation by the lizard people to better understand the impact toasters have on a society, maaaaan.

Same

But they will tell you that it is not just USA conspiracy, but all governments of the world, using "fake" space programs to siphon the tax payer money into black fund to control humanity as a whole. Never underestimate the stupidity of conspiracy theorists. You CAN'T provide an argument that they don't have an answer to. You simply cannot.

@@Wustenfuchs109 A shity argument anyway. The USSR was an autocratic regime, they didn't need to justify their expendings to the public...

@@Wustenfuchs109 Yes arguing with fools like playing chess with a pigeon it doesn't matter how masterfully tutored you've been in the theory, how sound your thinking and strategy is, or how good you are at the game in general, the pigeon is always going to knock over the chess pieces, crap on the board and strut around like it won anyway.

Excellent point! Had it been a hoax, the Soviets would have been on that like white on rice. It would have been a major, major propaganda coup. Yet not a peep from the Soviets or, since 1991, the Russians.

Imagine a rival sports team comes to your town and brings some fans. Those fans scream about how your team sucks. You then spend a whole lot of time making charts and graphs etc to explain to them your team does not suck. That is about smart it is trying to reason with moon landing hoax people. They don't really know or care if man landed on the moon. There is no logical argument that will make them change their minds. They are in it for the attention.

I have only had one CT scan in my 53 years. And it was 'inconclusive'

@@PORRRIDGE_GUN Doctors utilize something called Negative Predictive Value. They order tests, and if those tests come back negative (or inconclusive, as you experienced), it triggers their next actions in an equal but opposite manner of reaction if a test comes back positive. For example, if you come to the Emergency Department with chest pain and difficulty breathing, a provider might order a CT Pulmonary Embolism study. A pulmonary embolism is the medical term for blood clot in the lungs. This particular study has around an 11% positive rate. So, 89% of the time, the docs "rule out" a PE and move on to some other possibility for the pain and respiratory stress. That means that 89% of the time, patients got a rather large dose of radiation to their chest (including thyroid, heart, lungs, adrenal glands and part of the abdomen) so that the doctor can look for something else. The bill for a PE study is very large, and the reimbursement rate is exceptionally high (doctors and hospitals and yes, Techs like me make a lot of money off those negative tests). Plus, the patient population presents a real problem to doctors when they demand these tests (it sounds preposterous, but they do... they literally demand them). The doctors are not in a position to say no, because of various reasons that I won't go into, since I've already gone too long here. Anyway, TLDR, the amount of medical radiation applied to the US patient population is higher than it should be.

Thank you for your input. You have been able to add some much needed insight and motivation in very few words!

​@@baldbearddad Fascinating. Do you know of a good place to start if one is curious to know more about this? These things are exactly the things that worry me when talking about turning health care into capitalistic machinery (we are still sort of in limbo here in Sweden but it seems we are heading to more privatization).

@@baldbearddad Glad I am covered by the UK NHS. 'Take 2 aspirin and fuck off unless the pain comes back. NEEEXXT!'

Know Veritasium and neil Red?

Paavo (?), I was a bit disturbed by the prefix ”M” instead of ”m” on Sv, otherwise OK.

I’m a welder. Just because you’re an engineer doesn’t mean you know anything. Engineers cannot reproduce the Saturn V rocket no matter how much they try. Engineers cannot replicate the skills of tradesmen no matter how much they try

@@howardhughes6212 Your comment has noting to do with what Joe said about radiation and my comment. It takes engineers and tradesmen working together to build anything as complex as rockets. Have a nice day!

@@howardhughes6212 please... kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fruFZquV3bXViqc.html

What about the camera film as of 30yrs ago film could go threw x-ray machine cos it messed up the film , I believe they went but faked the video , that much radiation would've destroyed the the film 🎥

@@paulrasmussen5933 much easier to shield film than humans

And there was much rejoicing . . . Yay

@@paulrasmussen5933 ....'cuz by 1969 we knew so little about radiation from experiments here on Earth?

@@anotheruser676 🤣yea they only made a nuclear bomb and used it made a nuclear sub and used it but yea they knew nothing about radiation 🤣🤣🤣

Railroads...

​@@rickkwitkoski1976 ...you know our schools told us a bunch of bullshit right? You seem upset this person doesn't know this part of history, and it's genuinely not their fault that a literal child being taught this shit didn't give a fuck.

Or even better, time zone anomalies. Like the 30 minute timezones in Canada and Australia. How China is all one timezone. And how because Arizona doesn't observe daylight saving, and the Navajo nation crosses over into New Mexico, and the Hopi nation is completely enclosed by the Navajo, for half the year you have an area of -2 enclosed in an area of -1, enclosed in an area of -2.

This is a true statement. We shot a ballistic tinfoil pod at where we hoped it would be in the time it took to get there, traveling through a hellscape of micrometeorites and deadly lasers from millions of stars

@@gormauslander And it was build by the manufacturer who could do it for the least amount of money.

The biggest problem was building a rocket powerful enough to lift their balls. The Apollo astronauts launched knowing that they had a 10% chance of dying during the mission. Five astronauts actually died during the preparations and training for the Apollo missions… Those deaths were the entire reason Aldrin and Armstrong were in the LM that landed on the moon - the guys higher on the list were dead.

Absolutely, you can argue both Apollo 8 and 11 were dangerous to the point of being irresponsible. It's a minor miracle (and testament to the support crews) that they only lost three astronauts in that program.

Is that the reason Neil Armstrong was the first human on the Moon? ;-)

@@NakedProphet yes I agree with you.

@@NakedProphet _”The moon landings and COVID must be taken by faith, because unfettered scientific investigation is not allowed and much of the original data was deliberately obfuscated.”_ Um, no, pretty sure none of this is true, but go off.

@@NakedProphet Faith? Leave that to the magical sky daddy, science doesn't care if you believe it or not. What makes it hilarious is that you are using a a device with millions of transistors exchanging information at the speed of light around the world. If you were from another planet you say, there is not way this monkeys were using this technology it's fake!!! Thanks to a lot of real smart monkeys you have awesome technologies.

@@NakedProphet There's thousands of papers on covid just look it up on your universities library. Jesus Christ, deliberately obfuscated my ass. You're deliberately too lazy to do actual research.

your opinion? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gdalfthkq5ampo0.html

What about that hair on a rock? Proves the moon is inhabited by giants with C shaped hairs.

That has been disproven - the crosshairs on the originals were always found to be in front of the image. Even the conspiracy video 'American Moon' aknowledges that, and that documentary is full of lies!

I remember when Burger King had a Veal Parmigiana sandwich! Things were better in the old days (the 80's).

Maybe a dumb question but why did typewriters need electricity?

You are old.

@@gabor6259 introduction of electric type writers made typing faster as the older mechanical ones required quite a lot of force to depress the keys and would jamb if the keys were pressed too quickly. Electric type writers were basically like a computer keyboard attached to a printer and the typing speed improved by about 20+ words p/m.

@@gabor6259 If you look on the internet you can find what old typewriters looked like and how they operated. Then check out how electric ones move keys into position to make letters. The videos will show how they worked much better than I could describe.

Does the gentleman have a name?

@@MrDoggysmut Otto Hahn.

or spilling 90% of Britain's plutonium supply onto a wooden desk, and having to brun the desk to recover the ash

India once moved a satellite with an oxen-pulled cart

Follow dat money.

They used them often, but rarely repeat CTs on the same patient. Maybe that’s what he meant?

@@kikomagana1990 As a cancer survivor I can say that this is not the case at all. I had 4 in one year. One before surgery to guide the surgeon and three afterwards as follow-ups to make sure the cancer stayed away - and these were "with contrast" which means they were accompanied by IV radioactive sugars as markers for potentially cancerous tissue. Technically these were PET scans but the difference between them and CT scans is that PET scans are broader spectrum scans and therefore likely more radiation, not less.

I'm a doctor and I need a CT scan on your comment.

The fact that I'm using a device 10kx more powerful than computers they used, just to watch stuff on yt blows my mind

What goes on inside these computer chips is some real wizard level sh1t and when you think about how many things have to happen for this message to get to you and how fast that all takes place.... boom... Mindblown. yet we take it for granted, and we bitch if it stumbles one bit.

@@cybersentient4758 And vastly more powerful than that on the Apollo moon spacecraft.

@@CAMacKenzie what kinda tech are they using now I mean the things abt which we don't know yet

@@cybersentient4758 their technology is now no longer cutting-edge or advance, now they use laptop & iPad.

So many excellent quotes in that movie. “It’s got raisins in it….you like raisins. “

It is very important to have Debunkers and Entertainment made out of these Conspiracys! Sci Man Dan, Professor Dave Explains, Hbomberguy, those people really do epic Work entertaining grealty while debunking. Birds arent real is nice, but youtubers do the REAL WORK, tbh.

Man, that acronym catches me off-guard sometimes.

@@Vanished_Mostly 🤣

Well. I definitely believe you have a "BS" from Iowa.

Who? There were a few names mentioned in the video.

@@dudeinoakland I guess he means Van Allen

@@dudeinoakland At first I thought he meant someone in the video, such as the guy who drove Explorer 1 in the trunk of his car. Then I thought "this man" was referring to Joe Scott! Good to know Joe is as nice IRL as he seems in his videos!

The government tested the feasibility of using nukes underground to vaporize the ground to speed up digging and mining operations. I thought they knew about the radiation issues a nuke would leave behind long before using them. So I do not know what they were thinking using nukes to dig would make the dig site uninhabitable.

A top shelf human specimin.

Radiation from cancer treatments exceeds that of the radiation belts, but the system electronics, patient heart pacemakers, the patient are not killed in the exposure, usually.

@@chobai9996 It's the Dunning-Kreuger effect. They learn a few three-syllable words, and they think they're an expert. But they only think so is because they don't know enough to know how lacking their knowledge is.

Not to mention: 13:45 It was designed to take on the strongest solar flare, with special coating, water shielding and special suits, taking the 4000msv down to 350msv. (so it did have tons of shielding)

Ah yes, a fellow braking radiation connesurier.

I usually describe it as like using two two way mirrors for walls instead of glass to block a flashlight being shown into a room. Where, yes, the extra opaqueness blocks some light from entering the room, but then hits the mirrored wall on the opposite side and bounces around the room. Thus illuminating the room (and anyone in it) much more than if you had simply shined the flashlight straight through glass walls.

Why are there no conspiracy theorists who believe that the VanAllen belts are actually perfectly harmless? Ah, ha!

@@jh1859 Did you know lost technology from the 1980s used the van Halen belt to cause a sonic 'eruption' wherever needed?

I wonder if Van Allen thought of the merch potential of his discovery and sold "Van Allen Belts" and, maybe, "Van Allen Suspenders"

The owls are not what they seem.

In a couple thousand years archeological digs will discover that we managed to mostly wipe ourselves out through sheer stupidity. Our only contribution to the future of mankind is probably going to be second hand embarrassment. They'll dump the dirt back over any dig sites, find the nearest pub and agree to never speak of our Era again.

In 1998, A Gallup poll was done with various questions about different conspiracy theories. 6% said the moon landings were a hoax, and 4% more say they were not sure. That seems like big numbers except 26% said Bigfoot was real, and 43% said ghosts were real. 6% said Aliens abduction of people was real, and 2% said they had been abducted personally. Another question asked was did Apollo land on the moon and get kicked off by Aliens who lived there. 7% said yes. Gallup found that about 85% who said the moon landings were fake also said they were real but Aliens had kicked them off. Conclusion: Yea some people are kidding and some are crazy, and probably some are both.

Any low frequency answer is largely explained by trolling, or not paying attention to the question asked, or giving random answers to get through a survey as quickly as possible.

This. Not to mention a fair number of people are just saying they believe in these things to mess with people or like WWE fans who know wrestling is fake but say its real just to drive people up the wall.

@@alexyoon-sungcucina7895 "a fair number of people are just saying they believe in these things to mess with people". Absolutely agree. I just want to point out this applies to both sides of the argument. There are some people aggressively arguing the moon landings were real, often with little knowledge of the real events. Sometimes with false information.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gdalfthkq5ampo0.html

I want one!

@@chrisfuller1268 I may have made it on my Wife’s Cricut…I’m a big fan of the movement.

Lol wait until you here about the early Vanguard satellites, or better yet the Ranger, Luna, and Pioneer programs

I'm sorry, the internet became a household thing when I was 17... life was better before the internet. No convenience provided yet by the internet has matched the value of not knowing your neighbors' political views.

You're a big guy. What would happen if I took down the wifi?

I can't stress more the effectiveness of the CAPT. Totally agree.

🤜

I remember that. It was fantastic! 😂

“I want my two dollars!” Excellent movie.

@@jameshenderson3877 A few other moments... "I'm really sorry your mom exploded, Ricky." "Man, that's a shame, throwing out a perfectly good white boy like that." "I got this recipe from a magazine. It got a little wet and the pages stuck together, but I did my best. It has raisins. You like raisins."

Struggles of a KZfaq addict.

a life bra sounds terrible. you should take your bra off at the end of the day. give the girls some freedom.

also identifying as an incel is possibly also a tip?

That's a great observation I'll try to internalise, took a left turn with incel bit tho

@@voodoodolll His projection was too strong

Science-fans should maybe watch Atheist-youtubers also. Its blood-related.

@@nenmaster5218 WTF would I do that ?

Cut and paste

Exactly. If it really was MSV as shown (or more correctly MSv) all of those doses would be “mega” fatal.

My partner's father had his name on the lunar lander for making the landing gear circuitry. Or something important like that. I live right by Raytheon and it's weird to think of what was accomplished off the streets of Marine and Aviation.

@@LucyferSkyles that is so cool.

I am sick of people making up stuff about knowing this person, and having this and that qualification. That documentary has been proven to be deceptive, with footage intentionally left out that shows the premise of them being in low Earth orbit and using a rediculous cutout for the Earth to be false. If you are a medical professional, then I do not know where you learnt to carry out critical thinking, because I would never have someone who can fall for such deception anywhere near me. There is literally no proof the moon landing is fake, and a mountain of evidence that is objective, independent, reproducible and conclusive that we went.

Here are 3 videos that systematically dismantle this sham of a documentary. You can go straight to the 3rd video to see the main deception, but it makes more sense to watch the 2nd one before. I wonder if you still want to gloat that you know this man, who intentionally lied, and here is the indisputable truth. Perhaps you are in good company? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nLOidZtmnLXFqKs.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/o79xkspjprCUlpc.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/oM2YjKVyrpnNZqM.html

It’s great to know that there are more and people with scientific background who understand that it was a fake

I'm sure you know plenty about anesthesia, but on this subject, call me when you're degreed in astrophysics and aerospace engineering. This is like trying to lend creditability to a claim about a drug's efficacy by saying you have a degree in historical linguistics.

@@nickrose8733 I’m for genuine science. But the first two video you quote are simply an opinion from a KZfaq. That in its self is not sufficient evidence. I’m a believer that man went to the moon. I have examined the evidence. In my opinion, this was such a massive event in world history and Cold War propaganda, that the Americans did prerecord events in crystal clarity. Some of these prerecorded events were presented as evidence to the public. And some prerecorded was simply recording of training exercises. Equally Stanley Kubrick was brought in to advise on how best to capture the event and present to tv. Equally, jodral bank detected a signal from a Russian craft following the Apollo craft. That Russian craft trailed the USA craft and crash landed. Where I have concerns on, is what they found and saw on the moon, the lack of subsequent visits. Even the Chinese rover has recently shown some anomalies. And why haven’t the Russians landed on the moon. Of course no use being second. But only USA have landed msn on the moon. Russia were very far ahead of USA at the time and the moon mission was to bankrupt the soviets. All interesting stuff.

Science-fans should maybe watch Atheist-youtubers also. Its blood-related.

"Oh, you believe in anything? Nothing is real." I win.

I prefer the XKCD answer that they were faked in a sound studio on Mars.

😆

Wait.. who put that paper there? Is the one believing this adult? I have so many questions

Go ahead and JUMP!

@@ilarious5729 He was definitely an odd dude. Super great guy but, man, he had some crazy home-schooling that wasn’t very accurate.

That's because governments don't give space agencies the necessary budget. You got to do whatever is needed to get the job done.

ACKSHUALLY... Just kidding, thanks for the clarification.

This is the first that I've heard of that scenario. It makes sense to me, though I've never doubted that the moon landings were authentic. Thanks for your post.

Indeed I always heard it said that it was easier to go to the moon than convincingly fake it.

@@tommym1966 it's not possible even if they faked it Soviets were like a hawk watching entire us space program they never even claimed its fake as it isnt

@@gamingcreatesworlddd2425 you seem to be replying to a point I didn't make.

That's good... That's damn good.

That's what I thought Joe said - or should have said 😀

Awww now i wish i thought of that.

you won

Where you there? I was. You literally had to have proof before you published anything and if it wasn't true it was destroyed unlike the internet, you had more truth until the internet and like the previous commenter said Russia would have been all over a hoax!

Hmmm... I was born in 53, so have experienced pretty much equal amounts of the pre and post- internet world. And I can tell you there was absolutely nothing like the amount of stupidity around then as there is now.

i would say that you'd simply had to settle with "not knowning" which is different from knowing something that is false. It was a slower time for information.

nope, it's far worse now before the media actually had standards, that dropped massively.. these days the media is an absolute joke, if you take any of it seriously then you're a fool education has dropped off a cliff as well which is probably the main driver, critical thinking is exceedingly rare - the proof is again the media, today with it's lowest standard in reporting EVER and yet still profitable they'd be out of business if they carried on this way 20 years ago, they say kids today are the most educated - unfortunately very few bother to ask educated in what? - certainly not to think critically and there is the problem

it's not ignorance that's the problem... it's what you THINK you know that's the problem

what this guy said.

I just watched the video... and not gonna lie .. I thought the title said Van Halen belts ... so I was waiting for a segway and got confused .. and then I read the title again aha

@@dovakarp2943 im stoned and it looks like he is a guy in the other side of monitor talking to me. Great creator.

4⅗

Well said!

And an interesting side effect of that is that, the country that has been hit with the most nuclear explosions -- and the one that has been hit with the most nukes from foreign governments -- is the United States! (Fortunately none of those nukes had hit populated centers, although people still died from the fallout of those tests ....)

There are no coincidences.