awesome, thanks!

Very cool ! 😁👍

Cool! 🍻

sorry for the lame video!

what a fuckking luck! right!!

yes, true!

Yes man, I agree👍

They deal with two steels and they have nailed the heat treatment for decades combined with simple but good design 👌🏽

The Garberg is a great knife but it's pretty expensive. It's about the same price as similarly sized TOPS knives

@@DL-ij7tf it’s fair, depends on where you live though. I can buy one including the multi mount for 80$ including shipping and tax and I live in the Netherlands. For me a similar sized tops would cost over 100$ Price is dependent on region too.

cool, glad u like it!!! cheers!!

Spoken like a true moron

thanks a lot!

u are welcome!

u are welcome, awesome blade!

yeah, thanks, Garber mini, yes, good for gardening!

cool my friend!

yeah, i agree! i like the Robust more!

cool, u are welcome to the show!

they are!

haha, yeah it is wow!!!

yeah!

cool, it is a awesome Mora!!!

ok!

That's weird explanation, as if Mora didn't make carbon steel knives before garberg.

@@aleksandersever3039 It's been a while, but I saw an interview about that topic. I'd have to look into it again. I think it was an interview with the chief of production from Mora. But it could also have been an interview with Dave Canterbury. According to that interview, the plan was to release the carbon Garberg first and the 14C28N stainless one later. I found it also interesting as they use the same carbon steel as in their other blades while they didn't seem to have that much experience with 14C28N (most stainless Moras use 12C27). I can only assume they wanted different properties from the Garberg blade compared to their other knifes.

@@HrWisch Morakniv produces the same "Carbpn" steel for decades now. What you say about Morakniv, needed more time, to find out the proper heat treatment on the Carbon version of the Garberg, not only isn't true, but has no logic at all. They don't make a different heat treatment on any of their Carbon steel knives, all are heat treated, in the same oven, with exactly the same way. Same goes for all their steels. My only guess, is that what you said, is a rumor, that was written on KZfaq,. KZfaq, is the worst place to get any kind of information about knives, because 95% of the KZfaqrs, are backyard warriors, who saw the opportunity to make easy money, by calling themselves' knife, or bushcraft, or Survival or all these together with the word "experts next to them. They usually speak nonsense, that one copies and next day makes a video, where he says the same nonsense and that's , how a lot of misinformation, is spread around people, like a disease. Unfortunately, that's not my personal opinion, but facts. Morakniv, delayed the Carbon version, to make more money. It's simple marketing tricks that the common man, can not recognize. Where I know all that? Well, I a have a degree in Metallurgy since the 90's and I used to work in a knife company for many years. Generally, I know knives, way more than the common "collector", whose only knowledge they have on knives, are the misinformation, they get, just from KZfaq videos..

@@greekveteran2715 The info wasn't from any YT channel / video. It was either from Dave Canterbury (who promoted the Garberg at the time) or from a Mora employee shortly after the Garberg Carbon released. The statement was that the plan was to release the carbon version first but they wanted different properties from their C100 than usual and were not satisfied with the results. So they released the stainless version first. I obviously don't know if that info is correct. But I'm sure it was either from DC or Mora themselves.

thanks!

yes it is for sure!

ok, you are right!!

cool!

true, i have a lot of Moras!!

@@joex #MeToo

thanks!

yeah!

yes!

most of the Moras!

@@joex Sorry, meant to say the thicker Moras:)

@@JohnB-dr8sk no problemo!

"Weak scandi" - scandi is the strongest grind out of those.

@@robinhardwood1593 Hollow grinds are the strongest

would be awesome i think!

You are absolutely right my friend!!! That's what I been saying for years since got the Garberg in both carbon and stainless. Make a mora with a hand gard incorporated in the full tang construction. Can you imagine a 3/16 thick 4.5 to 5 inch mora survival knife. It would be the best knife in the world.

@@cal.f.alegria1196 If Dave Canterbury didn't convinced them to to exactly that, what are we suppose to do...

thanks, yes i think so too!!!

60 %is crazy!!!

That's 100% wrong. Both the stainless steels of Morakniv (12c27 and 14c28N) because of their amounts of Chrome and less Carbon than their Carbon steel, are both much softer. Also, Morakniv heat treats their Stainless at 56-58hrc ,when they heat treat their Carbon steel, at 58-60hrc. When it comes to blades and their rockwell hardness system, a 2 to 4 difference (56-58htc or 56-60hrc which is the range of Morakniv's steel's difference) might sound like a small difference, but it actually is not. 56hrc means the steel is soft, it won't hold an edge for long but it will have more toughness than harder steels. The edge of that blade will not chip, but it will roll easier, compared to how much Morakniv's Carbon steel will hold before it's edge chips. .Then 58 to 59 hrc, is usually the perfect hardness for a user friendly knife. That hardness means, that the blade will be both tough and strong, and generally, that's where a user is satisfied with the overall performance of a knife. Carbon steel they use, is 20C Shock Absorber(Sandvik) or UHB20C(Bohler-Uddeholm), it's the same steel with different name. If you find it called C100, is again the same steel. It's a similar steel to the more known 1095, however it's a cleaner steel, with very slightly better recipe which is obvious good news! That being said, even though their Stainless steels, on paper, are both tougher steels, in reality though, Carbon steels show better performance on every single aspect, except the carbides. Those carbides and that toughness, is what tricked you, believing that the stainless will have better edge stability. but as I said, in real use, the Carbon steel provides a more proper blade, for these kind of knives. they are preferable for both Scandi grinds, and for the indented use of these knives. The only real reason, to choose the stainless over the Carbon, is if you're really going to use this knife much, and what's the environment , that this knife is going to be used. (for example, by the ocean fishing? (get the Stainless steel), or in the woods trying your skills, using it as it was designed for? (Carbon steel is the way to go!))

@@greekveteran2715

Ooh I second that. Be interesting to see how strong the Lionsteel steels are.

maybe!

Niolox (T5) wouldn't be anywhere near as strong as the M5 or M7 as sleipner is a very tough 7% chrome tool steel. But Lionsteel makes great knives and good HT so the T5 should still be robust.

yes!

indeed!

yeah, would be interesting for sure!

no difference

yes, i have a lot of them!!!

I have a stainless Garberg and the 140mm (longer) Jakaaripukko. Both are nice but I think the Jakaaripukko is a better knife in my opinion.

Ia Hultafors HD, pare sa fie singurul care nu s-a rupt la testele lui Joe. In plus, e mult mai ieftin ca Garberg si Jokerpuuko 🤣

puuko 110

@@alinnimeni3789 yes

@@alinnimeni3789 nici mora robust nu s-a rupt. Și robust are teaca pe care o poți purta mult mai ușor, o poți prinde de buzunar sau de curea.

thanks!

u are welcome!

cool!

thanks a lot!!!

u are welcome!

thanks, soon!

thanks my rogue sheep!

thanks!!!!!!!!!

thanks margaret!

yes Mora Robust also survived, so nearly the Companion HD!!

strongarm i would say!

they were nearly the same, but i would go with the carbon!!!

Oh I see , thanks for your advise ! Have a nice day 👍😉

thanks!

Garberg was made for people who want a full tang. The bushcraft carbon black is a partial tang knife

2 weeks ago 3 policemen were looking for me, some crazy old bitsch alarmed them, fucked up world!!! (true story)

@@joex Oh yes, i know what you say. Those alarming bitches are everywhere, you must have gave her the fright of her life 🤣

cool, i think the tomatos cut themself when they just see a Buck!!!!

yes!

ufpro.com

ok!

cool!

It's 1060 steel so it should do well. Be a good test. I have several of their other models. The sheaths are unbelievably nice for the money. I've bought extra sheaths to use for other knives.

i will look it up!

true!

@@joex 💪

@@survivalabc I agree with that also. It's always a matter of point of view. To buy a knife because it helds up well at the destructiont test. It will make people end with knives like the Cold Steel SR1 Lite (CP). I had that one, and it was a cold shower when holding it. It's a break with zero balance. Fat tip, fat edge. No wonder it held up. .8 carbon. And everything too fat/thick to be a good slicer or stabber.

@@survivalabc "insulting" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

muy malo amigo! hijos de pu......

@@joex 😂

it did pretty good i would say!

The Mora Companion HD and Pro Robust have a much stronger tip in the tip/blade bending test than the Becker's and ESEE's and also than many other more expensive brands. The Garberg did also fine.

thanks!

Marlboro!!!!!!

Robust

kind of the same i would say!

falkniven is BS!

@joex agreed. Over priced far east garbage with uneven grinds knocked up in sweat shops.

@joex I'll save my money and stick with the garberg I think. I've had no issues with it 2 years, and I didn't like the way the jaakaripuukko handle seemed to loosen so easily. Thank you for your feedback

thanks!

ok i will try father!

@@joex Thank you my wayward son.

maybe!

I believe that many people want to find the most cost-effective knife from the violent aesthetics of the video, OK4 is worth making people scream👽

this one is a good one!

🤟🤟

ok, will try!

i am 100 % sure!

i think it is too!! haha!

@@joex that is what she said

i get insane sometimes, i can not count then correctly!

@@joex well...thats personal 🤣💪🏻

thanks, busse are not available here!

That's terrible. They have existed for 30 years on a reputation of being indestructible. On their website they say that they have no competition on the market. From my personal experience with the one I have, I have to agree. But seeing as how you are the grim reaper of the knife world , I would love to see you do what you do with one.

@@chrisdegraaf8515 i will try to get one!😁

of course!! haha!

never heard of it!

i will try!

puko is thicker so you can not compare them so easy!

but if i have to choose one i woult go with the puko!

oh yeeah!!!!

nope!

same i would say!

i will check them out first!

thanks!

i fight as i was trained!!!! it is what it is, sory!

would be a nice vid!

would be awesome!

thanks!

still cheaper than in Europe!

wow, a lot of sience in this one!!! cheers!

The stainless is surprisingly impressive. I have both the carbon and the stainless. In reality though, you would need to test more than one of each knife (at least 3 of each, made at different times in the factory) under the same conditions to reach a conclusion on which is better. I actually prefer the Basic 511 or the Robust for most tasks and the Robust did amazing in his tests.

thanks!"

@@joex Speaking from experience. "don't swat at a wasp, then it won't hurt you'. No, wrong. Wasps sting even if they are not provoked. The little aggressive fuckers. They are like Putin .

thanks, cool u believe in the "force" too!

ok cool!

did it, video in progress! also the pathfinder, in progress!!!

@@joex Fiskars X7

who is she?

i know, i ve been there! haha!