Thank you kind sir.

agreed, forensic security researcher here, that's exactly what the witness was saying. It's not a yes or no question per se, because of what @sin city quinn said, but what I would have said is "that's incorrect, I *DID* find evidence of alteration as I was not given original photos and that in and of itself is an alteration, so yes there was evidence of material alteration of the photo"

The lawyer had no idea what that meant and/or didn't want to know. That was so frustrating to see. I was yelling at the screen every time he'd ask the same question and kept saying it was a yes or no answer. When in fact it was not a yes or no answer.

Yeeess!!

@@jesusdamian2172 they frame it in a way to make it a yes or no. That's the lawyers job, is to present the questions in a way so that the only response allowed is good for them.

Time stamp please?

@@fakeaccount704 18:55

He said it again around 19:40

@@fakeaccount704 I'd start at 18:30

@@temavelasemthembu8390 thank you! I ended up finding it, but I appreciate it :)

SO SAD FOR REAL.SECOND HAND EMBARRASSMENT...

Yes, but it did make it so much more satisfying when Mr. Neumeister outsmarted that attorney.

U GOT THAT RIGHT GIRL

Right. Like where did Amber find these lawyers? Did no one else want the case because they were completely awful? Like even IF Amber was credible they still would be awful in representing her.

Un real. Shocking re photos

I liked that too lol. He didn't want him to answer and said they can just redirect but the judge was like well no, you asked and here is your answer now.

Is this the same lawyer who objected to his own question?

@@mish375 I think so

yes exactly!! and like a child tattling in his whiny voice “your honor! he’s not answering my question!” (crosses arms & stomps foot) lol omg so baddd

@@mish375 he does it again here i think like wtf

Hahahaha

Also the context of things that can't be answered as a yes or no question, and they continue to push the yes or no answer. Lawyers can be idiots too.

🤣

😁👍

@@soapa4279 just like their Client AH

But he can't do it doesn't matter. The truth is the truth no matter how you slice it

agreed

This is what lawyers do it’s annoying for us public because we don’t see it on a daily basis

Judge is biased

Exactly but they cry hissy sissy fits everytime they think JD lawyers are being hard on there lieing witnesses 😂😂

EXACTLY!!

sure but how many average people know that? maybe they think if they have digital or printed photos that's enough. in other words they don't know much about it.

@@theCosmicQueen she immediately get a lawyer and I'm sure she knew the importance of the phones.

@@theCosmicQueen As he stated, based on his experience people with evidence just don't throw out their phones. It was a statement based on his experience.

@@theCosmicQueen Amber stated numerous times that she had a mountain of evidence to support her claims, why would she throw a phone away or even have the need the duplicate photos and say they were from different dates!

Thank you. The comments are so interesting to hear from people in the field!

And they have the audacity to tell him "You don't have a degree in Computer Science, correct?" Like Computer Science Degree has far more weight than owning and working in a Digital Forensics Company that literally specializes on testifying on Photo Evidence.

HE WAS ALSO IN THE JODI ARIAS TRAIL

@@veronicalr217 I thought his name and face looked familiar.

Tefft in the wild spotting

I like this guy has a really good: I believe in the science vibe

Exactly, he was determined to tell the truth.

I liked how when the judge told him to answer the question with a yes or no, he refused and stuck to the facts of why it wasn't possible.

@@amandasmith7535 it is possible, the answer is no he doesn't hold a belief it was, since he can't tell.

Caged dogs bite

Coz they know they work for a liars.

He said he been to court many times. I'm sure he used to that hostile questioning.

Her legal team are garbage, just like her

they learned each other mannerism and energy

Lawyers love when witnesses answer with yes or no, hence why they always ask closed ended questions. It allows the lawyer to set the tone and create a narrative that helps their client. Any good witness will always answer with a free-form answer, and never(sometimes it can be helpful) with yes or no.

Yeah but it looks bad when you don't listen to what the judge orders

@@-Patali- But it's worse to lie just to be liked.

When this guy does it, it's impressive. When Amber does it, it's gaslighting 🙄

Amber has not answered a question by simply saying yes or no this entire time. She'll even repeat the question, reword it, and then give a quick answer. Funny how her team wants just a yes or no

My thought exactly!

It is not about the lawyers being unlikeable but rather the fact that her case, and the stories that she has presented as well as the witnesses who have deposed all evidence the fact that there are so many inconsistencies that point to fabrication. The lawyers are sadly faltering and possibly resorting to a more aggressive stance because of the fallacies in the case presented by Amber Heard and they are merely trying to do their best of defending their client, which is their duty.

amber's lawyer: " Be(e)n Rottenborn ",sounds like what happened at this guy's birth, who are his parents satan & the harpy?

They’re legally required to believe their client….

@@jaileigh But believing her and behaving like her are two very different things

It was insanely infuriating that the attorney couldn’t understand what the witness was saying yet continued to persist in obtaining a yes or no answer.

@@giiness508 and the judge wasn’t helping matters.

Exactly, his level of expertise clearly showed. He really put efforts in explaining the facts, yet the other party just won't listen

Amber didn't hand in her phone where all of this evidence came from lmfao. She's so guilty

Smart way to say you are laying B...lol

Absolutely 💯

@@PineappleBaconPizza That it self shows she has something to hide. JD gave everything, that's why they have personal txt msgs of him talking bad about ATurd.

It may have been copied (aside from the obvious photoshopping)

This 👆

I noticed that too... AH's lawyers are really something aren't they?

i don't think AH's Team is that bad... they are just trying to grap every straw they can get because of her lies, they know she's lying about everything and i bet, if they would've known that before the trial, they wouldn' t have taken this case just to ruin themselves

@@rabbitreloaded idk cause apparently this is the same group of lawyers who fought in the defamation case in Britain i think

​@@itzelheruiz9139 they were. I think they got cocky because of that trial. They didn't have much to do and it was private

But how did he even become an expert in computer forensics when he has a degree in Political Science?

@@bbginc694 because you don’t have to major in something in college to be an expert at it? Did you not know that?

@@bbginc694 Personal experience here, _most_ people who I know who do highly specialised, technical careers like this did degrees which are, at best, tangentially related and learn 99% of what they know on-the-job.

@@Tony-gh8gg So what makes him an expert with no certifications? He testified he had no certifications in computer forensics?

@@bbginc694 A certification doesn’t necessarily hold much weight. Quality of your work does. How come 15% of programmers are completely self taught ? Because doing the work is what sharpens the skill not being certified or passing exams.

love this!!! explains it all

😂😂😂

best comment 😂💯

You say you are a fashion designer, but isn't it true you have never sown two tires together?

I would say 5 divided by zero the answer is 5.

The sad thing is there are other women out there like her. My ex best friend did things like this. Just lucky enough she wasn't rich enough to get people to listen to her BS like amber. I wonder how many men get destroyed by rich crazy women.

I started pre law courses many many years ago... it's still my passion, but shortly there after decided it wasn't for me. I couldn't imagine defending a client that I knew was lying out their rear! This case is a prime example! How do you stand up there and defend Amber?! Her lawyers can't possibly ALL be that ignorant?! I have read over and over by Elains peers that she is brilliant, and very well respected in her field, and she just potentially ruined her career! I sure as heck hope Amber pays her team enough to live off of for some time, as they may not have much work after this garbage! Money talks for sure, but no amount of anything would place me behind that podium defending that woman!

Reminds me of the movie "Gone Girl" ... toxic feminism is NOT equality.

@@erincoveyhq9218 Well said!

her faces make me her pity party audio to johnny.

I wanted to slap him so bad.

I hate all of Heard’s lawyers. I find them condescending.

so dishonest.....

He is fs probably a bookie or something. Something about that man tells me he doesnt just analyze meta data if you know what im on about.

@@syniister7055 well he did major in poli sci; something close to forming a thesis and arguments on case studies like law would be like.

@@saykig yeah but hes a G about it, u know he "takes care of it"

BOOM!! *CLAPPING*

I'd put him 2nd to Curry. She manhandled Amber's lawyers in the most professional way possible

I applaud him and Dr Curry for standing their ground, AH team is so mean and unpleasant, they act as if the witness is an enimy of theirs.

He had a couple great points that stood out to me, the photos were run through an editing software and those last photos were the same. He was not there to speculate who edited them, just that they were edited. Great witness I’m not sure how she thought she could get away with that.

Sorry to bother, but what was the time stamp?

Justice always come thru..

@@fredrezfield1629 No He's Not. He's actually refusing to give "Yes Or No Responses" to Her Legal Teams peer pressure. If He was WEAK (This is the correct spelling, You spelt it as A day off the week) In His Testimony why do You think they're running scared and trying to get Him to respond with Yes or No answers, that cannot be answered "Under Oath" with simple Yes or No's....

@@fredrezfield1629 she lost, get over it

Plus amber NEVER answered with yes or no 😂 so stfu right

@Johnny Depp bruh u rly thought 😂

Right it’s so in ur face it’s not funny

@@trashsuitandy9750 Hey just put your trash suit back on. I mean if the shoe fits kind of situation. Maybe after doing so you'll see that accountability for false accusations is every bit as important as the things you listed. Good for you.

@@trashsuitandy9750 Did you? I mean, you're commenting on a video of this trial and your implication is that both is impossible. 🤔

@@trashsuitandy9750 And yet you're commenting on a 35 min video. xD Btw, people CAN do both. ;)

Yeah the team was absolutely desperate

💯💯💯

Anyone noticed that the court camera man stays more on Johnny?

Lol, the guy isn't even an expert. He has a political science degree 😂

@@jdavis8970 from 42 years ago. If he has then worked the past 30 years in that industry that would be experience no?

This is how cross-examination works, dude. Depp’s lawyers did that too. They only ask questions for getting the answers they need. Any unwanted data may drive the situation out of attorney’s control.

Also the fellow that was the manager of the trailer park was accused of wanting to be famous!

Like facts are facts lady, doesn't mean everyone wants fame. Doesn't matter if they do, that doesn't make the facts less factual lol

She's entirely pathetic. I feel like we are watching her develop alzeimers

I'm surprised they haven't objected for relevance since AH's team does that for everything- like when they are asking that woman about AH's demeanor after assaulting someone. Like W T F

@@RachelBlomstrom yeah they are all over the place all of the time lol

Thought the same thing!

Absolutely 💯

But that expert did not forget lol

wish the judge would have reprimanded him, instead of looking up the question for him

You are not crazy. He did not forget. He accidentally opened the door for the expert to talk more about the metadata. The judge had restricted his testimony at Heards team request. But bc the lawyer asked the question, he opened the door. And once it’s open it can’t be shut.

So true!

Because they have ZERO..so have to go after his witnesses in such a hostile manner

They are not hostile, they are just scared that they will get exposed, they are just lashing out on everyone trying to intimidate people. They are just being overly defensive because they are genuinely scared of their lies getting exposed.

It seems that they get more aggressive in their tone as it gets towards the end of the trial

They want to irritate that the guy needs to admit that he is wrong and they’re right and heard was telling the truth 🙄

💯

@@kikilee3241 l D po00 O O

lmao! for real!

Exactly.

You can also see from the screenshots that the two copies had data loss so some data have been edited away hence the pictures are manipulated.

I'm no expert but from what you're saying you could edit a photo and then take a screenshot of that edited photo hence bypassing edit metadata evidence?

@@richcrypto92 Something like that. Everytime you took SCREENSHOT of photos, the screenshot version should be treated as copies. We need the raw photo taken by smartphone device camera

@@Nightdreaux22647 Exactly… The phone itself. Why wouldn’t Amber keep the phone with her “Mountains” of evidence on it

Seems like it's common sense.

Great witness

and did you see the young one that "take care " for paparazzi ? after AH lawyer accused him for wanting 15 min of fame and he told her he could thing the same way about her taking AH case :D gold moments . sorry for my english and have nice day !

@@baeh3657 I think off the record she properly would accept that term lol. Then she can finally go home and be free of wasting time with Amber.

@@baeh3657 Your English is just fine. And I agree with you.

That was golden! I’m so glad he stuck to his guns and didn’t give into the constant badgering in attempts to get “yes” or “no” answers.

Surprised the judge didn’t demand he repeat his question

I loved how he said that. Hopefully the jury will understand that manipulated versions of several photos exist, the Heard legal team are trying to shut down expert discussion around the colour and contrast changes that were made, and that they are not evidence of injury.

money.. its called money

@@kilcitykitty i doubt it, her rulings made sense if you know about the metadata evidence ruling and other stuff about court proceedings. and she did force the question to be repeated and answered, she’s also ruled heavily on depp’s lawyers’ side this entire trial. perhaps heard’s lawyers are finally understanding how a trial works and are making fair objections lol, having watched most of this trial the judge has certainly been fair. she seems almost to be annoyed by heard’s legal team’s unprofessionalism.

@@gossipgal1418 she did demand the question be read back, he stated he couldn’t recall it and it would have been confrontational and unprofessional to ask him to repeat it himself

Shrimp

I loved his couldn't careless approach and just focusing on the facts like you stated. JUSTICE FOR JOHNNY DEPP

I found this disturbing. At 8mins 1sec. A moment of outstanding falseness. How quickly can she change her expression when she thinks no one is watching. Scary.

@@lordnevets9184 I thought I was the only one who noticed that!

@@lordnevets9184 same here. Huge fake smile went straight back to seriousness

She has a lot of make up on her cheek.

Monday she was acting totally different

She's moody

She’s not moody she’s fair lol.

Her lawyers are an embarrassment to their profession. Nasty, rude and pushy don't like them.

I was already having the doubt that the judge is kind of on the side of Amber. A lot of times the judge have sustained the objections from the evil's lawyers by not letting the witnesses to finish speaking. If Amber wins this case that means the western society has been destroyed due to extreme feminism.

they did it deliberately so the meta can’t be read.

He. Shld talk to a jehovahs witness!!! Ha

true

Love him so much u use the govt name

Because he's a scientist, and deals in facts and provable (or not) data.

That's why He's the CEO

The guy knows his stuff for sure …

Degrees don’t always mean much.

not every career needs a degree.

Oh, so many witnesses and so much evidence damaging to her

@@CakeBossMom I often find that those who are ultra book smart, don't always have the common sense and physical capability to do a great job

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 speaks volumes about each of them

funny user ID....

Yep, anytime the truth is about to come out they object or hearsay it. They won't let Johnny's witnesses talk but go forbid their paid witnesses can, smh.

That's their job

But isn't it very obvious the images are the same though? I mean any person with an average sized brain can tell the two photos are the same with one edited to have more saturation. I mean the hair, the expression, facial deformities etc. are all in the exact same spot.

@@guitarboy0211 exactly! She's trying to gaslight the whole world the stup!d teard! She's really not as smart as she thinks she is lol 🤣

@@guitarboy0211 You don't get idea of this thing bro just ask, it doesn't matter if they look similar, as an expert of photography and photo retouching too with 11 years of experience, I myself can tell you that saturation matters that much cuz it changes moods and facts, crop even with 1% zoom in can change a lot to the viewers and can affect anyone's judgement, lastly and which is more important, its not about showing thet these photos are photoshopped, they only try show and illustrate the false claims of Amber's which means ( the judge and jury will know that this all are lies told by her ) Amber Heard today and her team are done, Johnny has won the case it done 100% no one on earth could prevent Amber from losing now.

Yeah, I've been retouching for only five years but that shiet was the first fcking thing I've learned about digital pictures lmao

@@lukavisuals1065 I'm not really questioning the methods or saying Johnny's team shouldn't be bringing in witnesses to further solidify their case. I'm just saying, the two images that were shown, I went online and examined them myself. They look pretty much the same. It took me a total of 10 seconds to come to the conclusion that they are the same photograph but I do understand the nuances of it all and I'm not trying to be argumentative with you either. It's just that I expect the jury (or rather hope) they come to the same conclusion I did coz I was in fact cringing that she would even claim the photos are different and shot at two different times of day. Also thanks for your insight, appreciate the explanation.

cropped or resized photos aren't the same as tampered photos; that would be if there was a fake bruise painted onto her arm. we have no evidence that happened, but that the pics were copied onto other devices-- maybe for printing.

@theCosmicQueen it's unacceptable to not bring ORIGINALS to court..... when I had to go to court for harassment and online stalking, my whole phone was evidence. I didn't delete anything, nothing did I change.

The word 'Skullduggery' always reminds me of Terry Pratchett.

Did you mean to say instead "spitting a plot line in favor of Amber" and not "Johnny"?

@@neliaferreira9983 no, Nuemeister refrained from giving a narrative to Johnny:- recall Nuemeister was Johnny’s witness. If he gave in and said “yes, I have found evidence that the photos were edited”, and left it at that without an explanation, that would have been a tainted response misleading the jury as it could be interpreted as some intent to manipulate the photo on AH’s part. However, he was trying to explain that may not necessarily be the case as the photos presented are either screen-grabs or backups of backups (3rd generation photos) and to that point, what is presented in evidence wouldn’t stand to scrutiny, which could just be an honest/rookie mistake:- that’s why the original phone is important. To put it simply, Mr. Nuemeister did not seek to offer a conclusive opinion on the authenticity of the photos, even after demonstrations that showed noticeably different visible versions of the same photo. He was simply saying, we have no way of knowing which wouldn’t be an outright win for Johnny nor an outright loss for Amber. Compare that AH’s witness who shot his own credibility in the foot by stating with a degree of scientific certainty that he found the “source” and “originals” and therefore, the photos not edited…albeit being found on IPhones/IPads made months after the relationship. And the sad thing is, I’m willing to bet that not even Amber’s own expert was given the original phone. Note also that Nuemeister was able to trace some photos to an IPhone 6…a device which matches the timeline of events…should tell you who the real expert is.

At times I think so yea. Because sometimes it's neither yes or no or both if the question is vague enough or twisted enough.

This is why I don't get why more witnesses just straight up refuse to answer twisted questions posed by ambers team. Like yeah, I get it, you are instructing me to answer yes or no and the Judge legit said I need to answer the question. However, why can't they just respectfully refuse to answer the question if it is put in a way that will affect my integrity to remain under Oath...

That's why they have redirect,the other team can come back and allow him elaborate

Thats why he said incorrect

Exactly. That’s my thought.

That was the moment for me as well.

This is a criminal action by someone on AH’s side or Heard herself.

If she or they didn't do anything wrong, have nothing to worry about. Why are they trying to prevent this guy from talking and squirming in their chairs?! Also I can't stand her lawyer's approach, makes me want to scream! 🤔🤬

@@shannonelyse6506 Exactly!

Exactly my 9 year old said they were the same photo that each strand of hair was in the same place.

nope. just cropping or resizing does that. or saving to a thumb drive or disc. nothing at all suggests that the bruise is a fake, but totally real looking, photoshopped bruise.

Well said!!! 💯 Agree with you.

her features are so fine, those cheekbones do not look like they have been hit repeatedly, that nose has not been broken, especially without medical attention

It's because she's trying to appear simultaneously hurt, yet strong. Just look at how insulted she was when Camille called her a "victim"! She can't stand the idea of being weak, despite claiming to have been violently attacked on so many, different occasions. She is crippling her own case under the weight of her gigantic ego, and contradicting her own testimony due to her uncontrollable narcissism. Her cheap af, clown lawyers must be pulling their hair out, desperately trying to clean up the messes she keeps making!

Yeah, not to bring up a buried skeleton or anything, but for the sake of comparison look at Rihanna's injury. That's real, no one is gonna argue, and that was a single round of violence. It's absolutely tragic but the incident was still not even as severe as what Amber is claiming here, and Ri got that much injury on her face. And here Amber is, after the repeated alleged assault with rosy cheeks

@@SaltiBebe Becasue everything Amber have said so far has been a lie.

They are beyond desperate at this point.

Thank goodness for the years of experience testifying in trials. He was so chill.

Leading is usually the objection when the one doing the questioning tries to get someone to answer a specific way

It was leading to me, but Depp's lawyers did a poor job objecting to this.

@@sovo1212 He was Depp’s witness. Why would they have to object to leading? Nothing the witness had to say would hurt JD, only AH.

This statement is extremely hilarious 😂😂 and correct. Love it.

It's incredibly infuriating to watch, not to mention exceedingly inappropriate behavior.

@@ufodeath I'm only 15 minutes into the video and it's already infuriating me because I work with computer forensics aswell and seeing him not being allowed to explain is bloody irritating!! argh

It wasn't the answer he was expecting

Fear, pure and simple fear

In all fairness, this was the one time I could empathize with him. I too forgot the exact wording of the question (the semantics of which were apparently relevant) in the dozen or so seconds they were talking to the judge.

That wasn't what he did. The judge sustained the objection Depp's lawyers had to him trying to not let the answer the expert wanted to give. This means the expert was told he could answer. However because he asked the question again, the lawyer decided the best thing to do was to say "I can't remember too, don't worry let's move on"". But Depps's lawyers jumped and got the court to read the question from the transcript so that he could answer it. It was never a tantrum, it was a tactic to try and fix his inability to get the witness to say something that discredited his previous evidence.

How could werthers forget the question,he asked it twice and had it in his notes

stupidest thing i’ve ever seen. i would have said “i’ve already answered the question.”

I hope that near the end they call Amber on the stand again and pull out every lie she said. They proved that it was not 2 different pictures taken with and without light on as she claimed and I really hope they call her out on that. They can't accuse her of modifying the pictures because evidence of that can't be proven but they can certainly point out she lied about it being 2 pictures and show them both side by side for the jury to see at least one is definitely modified in some ways.

They most def wouldn’t just stop the case they’d probably wait till after to bring up court charges and so she can probably incriminate herself further

She also lied about leaking the photo to tmz

Bc it's not a criminal case

@@breajh8965 but proves she knowingly committed perjury under oath she lied under oath it's a crime

He has to say yes or no just like depps lawyers ask of Amber's witnesses. Depp lawyer talks over people disrespectfully and forces their silence.....are we watching the same trial lol

It wasn't misleading or aggressive. It was answer yes or no. That is how big people conduct trials. This isn't a TV show. The question was did you find evidence.....the answer was no because he couldnt... .doesn't matter why he couldnt.....that's for depp lawyers to question

​@@HollyBonAlibi I'm aware it's a real court case and I respect your opinion on the matter. Compared to the others it was more aggressive. However, it is clearly misleading when you ask for an answer on something that can't be answered honestly because of the way someone is phrasing the question. Hopefully you at least can admit there is foul play involved with the photos looking identical though.

Telling the truth is the only option in a courtroom . Look up procedure.

@@donaldnolan5272agreed foul play 4sure

Amber never turned in her phone I believe where all of these pictures supposedly came from.

"injury"photos, would be a more accurate way to refer to them

@@kiwibob223 your right about that😂😂

I reckon she took them after she had those ridiculous cheek implants put in.

Like the man was saying, people don't want to get rid of their phones because of the evidence on them. He was implying Amber actually gave her phone up, so who knows when those photos were taken.

She continues to pass notes and smirk

Exactly! When they were showing all the pictures of her face and stuff earlier in the trial even I could tell it was multiple different edits of the same picture! Amber's lawyers are literally trying to prove Johnny's witnesses aren't trustworthy. 🙄🙄

Busted for sure! Amber had just told camille that she handed over her phone for forensic testing and her photos were all determined to be the originals😂😂😂

How are those pictures even legal to present in court as evidence? Can't even authenticate that they are real. That seems the same as allowing hearsay

bullshhht. she could have done bare minimum like correct it from green to real skin tone, or added enough lighting to make it visible. that's also called editing. or cropped or resized them. None of which does anything to create a fake bruise. Snapshots can actually lighten up a bruise in the original image so it won't look as dark and bad as it really is. Rather than the opposite.

That lawyer was disgustingly rude

Ageism is real in discrimination.

He’s not elderly! He’s what, early sixties tops?

@@ejws1575 he said elder, not elderly

@@British719 you're saying the elder aren't elderly?

yeah, that lawyer is just so aggravating and annoying.

@Rose Anne Boushard then how do you explain the metadata stating they’re screenshots and not original iphone camera photos?

@Rose Anne Boushard we’re waiting for you to answer the question above my comment!!

@Rose Anne Boushard girl what 🤣🤣 don’t tell me you actually believe that

@Rose Anne Boushard I’m going to take this as you’re probably a troll. because no one actually believes that.

it is outside of the judge’s duty. in cross examination, you ask leading questions which are questions that demand a yes or no answer. it was on depp’s team to object to the question correctly. if there is no way to object to the question, the witness must answer it yes or no. court proceedings are also very technical, and all of the lawyers are aware of the way testimonies work. the purpose of redirect is for clarification, where they can ask an open-ended question and the witness can give a more nuanced answer. you can’t cross examine after redirect, which is beneficial and lends to the idea that most issues of testimony are more nuanced than yes or no answers. this is why you saw the lawyer during redirect ask a question that allowed the expert to clarify his answer to the specific question he didn’t want to answer yes or no to, and then nothing further.

@@zoesolomon7773 I understand- then the witness can clarify on redirect ...but there are questions that just cannot be answered via 'yes' or 'no'. If the witness answers 'yes' or 'no' to one of those questions the answer is recorded in the transcript and can be used against the witness later/forever. So, it's a very vulnerable position - the witness is obliged to lie. The redirect maybe won't save the witness in a later cross in a future trial because they will show and read the transcript and they will ask: 'On date Y did you testify X under oath?' and again 'yes' or 'no'? Then on the redirect, the lawyer can forget to ask 'In a previous testimony why did you reply X?' (because he/she doesn't know by heart that the witness clarified that answer in a previous redirect) and the witness is then potentially seen as a liar. I don't understand of law but shouldn't be the witness protected on these questions?

the only relevant part was, "is there any evidence" of making fake bruises on photos. that is, cold hard evidence. otherwise - nothing else matters of his testimony. That was a yes or a no. If yes, then ask more questions. If no, that's the end of it.

Very obnoxious right?!

My thoughts too. And so cool, he insists on staying in a scientific/philosophical metaverse/narrative where an answer can't be given. Though I'm surprised the judge accepted yet another 'That's incorrect!'!

soft spoken but confident in his views

Thomas ikr! I feel like most of JD's witnesses have been credible and reserved. Compared to most of AH's witnesses that became emotional, tried to oversell, and were often misleading or lying like her 'friends.' Idk why so many of AH's witnesses felt the need to try to influence the jury so blatantly, but I suspect for at least some of them, it was insecurity.

@@patricknez7258 AH witnesses were all rambling looney quacks like her...I mean seriously.

I love this man eventho he’s being cross examined, has a lot of confidence. Go Team Johnny

Yeah. Pretty disgusting that they try to portray the "everyday people" witnesses as just wanting to be on TV. And they try to portray the expert witnesses as unqualified or lying because they got paid to lie by JD team or both.

Today was worse than normal. I never like to look at her but today I literally couldn’t stand to look at her face!

Very sickening Her true colors are coming through

That is so true

She was obnoxious today. Wanted to rub that smug look off her face.

SHE is sickening 😒

Lol they can't argue with the testimony, so they play narrative games

Wow, thank you for that info.

I think even a not-technologically-literate jury can get the gist that the Heard team are trying to maneuver within extremely narrow limitations of what's actually going on; and that they have to do so out of a defensiveness for what the guy would otherwise reveal.

I didn’t take those courses and I can tell they are scum of the earth. They play dirty and when you play like that you are guilty. I am also an empath and you can feel real and fake easily 💕

I concur completely.

to lies

It suck tho right, that this can happen to a common man who doesn't have the finances and resources to hire such great litigators and that itself can cost them their whole life/reputation, everything. That someone else as vile as her can infact get away with it and has for so long.

Around 1200$/hour for the 3 people that are there with him

Laughing at this.. the lawyer actually had a chance for this one because the judge had allowed him! Lol

Exactly! People who don't have some knowledge regarding the photo or this memory back up stuff did not understand the magnitude of this testimony... If there's even a single person on the jury who understands vaguely any of this stuff he'll totally be anti Amber by now, not that people needed this to see how fake her case was

I hope there's a photographer in the jury

Sadly, as a photographer and involved in the industry for more than 40 years. This witness is speaking a language none of them understand. Facts over truth....

I don't understand, can someone explain it??. . Like; I don't know what Metadata is..

as someone working in digital media daily, that gentleman couldn't have been clearer to me. I only hope the jury is educated enough, to understand the level of tampering

that’s because it is disgusting

That's literally their job though...

Their job is to win that’s why Its true lawyers are liars

@@deepblack2193 That's not a fair assessment. The lawyers job is to provide the client every legal right afforded under the law.

If we see it, the jury sees it. They made this witness's testimony even more powerful by the way AHs atty tries to refute it during cross, even attempting to discredit his knowledge. Anyone watching would have seen that this witness knows EXACTLY what he's talking about .. This witness is one if, if not the most, devastating to AH's case.

@@B_Bodziak which includes supporting their fabricated lie as seen in this case. We live in a world where OJ walked free and Kardashian became a household name.

Agreed. Just clutching at straws.

If people just wanted to be on tv shouldn't AH's legal team be inundated with requests as well??

3 witnesses

@@meihauf 🤣👏👏👏

@@2pknify1 who else aside from the TMZ guy?

He was firm and continued to stand firmly by the facts. He is such a pro!

yeah but how different. So they changed in size? they changed to make it light enough to see? cropped it for printing? or what. No proof of making fake realistic looking bruises though. That's entirely different and requires a real good graphics person/program. I doubt you can make em on a phone. . still they had NO data saying the bruise was fake.

@@theCosmicQueen because they couldn’t.. they weren’t the raw photos, NOBODY could, ambers team purposely did that so the actual data was no longer there after being compressed and losing a lot of it. are you actually on amber heard’s side…? hopefully now that you see she’s lost the case you know who’s in the wrong here.

I noticed that also. I had forgotten she fired her original PR. Before it looked more like a don't talk to me unless it's absolutely necessary kind of relationship. She strikes me as that kind of celebrity.

You’re spot on with that! It looks forced and fake

Yeah compared with beginning of the trial where she seemed to act innocent, feared and about to cry and now all that facial changed. Probably she saw all the comments on Twitter and KZfaq LOL

Yes so weird

noticed it too. she started hugging and side kissing them every morning or when she goes out at the end of the days trial. LOL. and doing sticky notes to pass around. Coz she cant do gummy bears as she would be too obvious. LOL

He charges 999,999 per case

@@kiloton1920 so?

@@elly00177 pretty sure he's joking man 😆

@@kiloton1920 I swear I saw u putting on the same comment on some other video few days back 🥸

@Oliva Olive Must be a sad life eh

I kept the phones with my ex's abusive messages and calls. I never said anything about his behavior but I needed to convince myself that I wasn't crazy.

Exactly. This lawyers did not want him to tell the jury that she altered her photos who knows how many times bc they were screenshots being sent to and fro. The lawyers did not make her look any better from this.